Applications for New Awards; Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions Program, Part A, 23647-23652 [2023-08094]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Applications for New Awards; Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions Program, Part A Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2023 for the Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions (ANNH) Program, Part A, Assistance Listing Numbers 84.031N (Alaska Native) and 84.031W (Native Hawaiian). This notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control number 1840–0810. DATES: Applications Available: April 18, 2023. Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 20, 2023. Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 16, 2023. ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045) and available at www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-26554. Please note that these Common Instructions supersede the version published on December 27, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robyn Wood, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 2B203, Washington, DC 20202– 4260. Telephone: (202) 987–1577. Email: Robyn.Wood@ed.gov. If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7–1–1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Full Text of Announcement I. Funding Opportunity Description Purpose of Program: The ANNH Program provides grants to eligible institutions of higher education (IHEs) to enable them to improve and expand their capacity to serve Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian students. Institutions may use these grants to plan, develop, or implement activities that strengthen the institution. Background: Students’ sense of belonging impacts postsecondary retention.1 Creating that 1 Davis, G.M., Hanzsek-Brill, M.B., Petzold, M.C., and Robinson, D.H., ‘‘Students’ Sense of Belonging: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 259001 sense of belonging begins with ensuring the institution’s ability to serve students well. Research shows that institutional belonging predicts better persistence, engagement, and mental health for enrolled students.2 Mental health concerns for college students have increased due to a growing number of student exposures to trauma and disruptions in learning and disengagement from school and peers.3 Studies indicate that the mental health of Alaska Native students has seen the largest decline since 2016, and both Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian students reported significant increases in mental health issues during the COVID–19 pandemic.4 Implementing or expanding institutional capacity to provide mental health and other services that help support students’ social, emotional, and academic needs also supports student retention. Through this grant program, the Department encourages Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions to develop, create, or enhance programs that foster students’ sense of belonging and to implement services that will help students complete their degree programs. Through the competitive preference priorities for this grant competition, the Department invites applicants to submit proposals to provide high-quality learning, improve student engagement, and meet the needs of Native students. Priorities: This notice contains two competitive preference priorities and one invitational priority. The competitive preference priorities are from the Secretary’s Supplemental Priorities and Definitions for Discretionary Grants Programs, published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2021 (86 FR 70612) (Supplemental Priorities). Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2023 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 5 points to an application for each priority, depending on how well the application meets the priorities. Applicants may The Development of a Predictive Retention Model.’’ Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 117–27 (Feb. 2019). 2 Gopalan, M., & Brady, S.T. (2020). College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A National Perspective. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 134– 137. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/ 0013189X19897622. 3 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/10/mentalhealth-campus-care. 4 https://www.bu.edu/articles/2022/mentalhealth-of-college-students-is-getting-worse/. PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 23647 respond to one or both priorities, for a total of up to 10 additional points. These priorities are: Competitive Preference Priority 1: Meeting Student Social, Emotional, and Academic Needs (up to 5 points). Projects that are designed to improve students’ social, emotional, academic, and career development, with a focus on underserved students (as defined in this notice), by creating a positive, inclusive, and identity-safe climate at IHEs through one or more of the following activities: (a) Fostering a sense of belonging and inclusion for underserved students. (b) Implementing evidence-based practices for advancing student success for underserved students. Competitive Preference Priority 2: Increasing Postsecondary Education Access, Affordability, Completion, and Post-Enrollment Success (up to 5 points). Projects that are designed to increase postsecondary access, affordability, completion, and success for underserved students by addressing one or more of the following priority areas: (a) Increasing the number and proportion of underserved students who enroll in and complete postsecondary education programs, which may include strategies related to college preparation, awareness, application, selection, advising, counseling, and enrollment. (b) Supporting the development and implementation of student success programs that integrate multiple comprehensive and evidence-based services or initiatives, such as academic advising, structured/guided pathways, career services, credit-bearing academic undergraduate courses focused on career, and programs to meet basic needs, such as housing, childcare, transportation, student financial aid, and access to technological devices. Note: Under 34 CFR 607.10(c)(13), grantees may not use funds awarded under this program to pay directly for childcare and transportation expenses. (c) Supporting the development and implementation of high-quality and accessible learning opportunities, including learning opportunities that are accelerated or hybrid online; creditbearing; work-based; and flexible for working students. (d) Providing secondary school students with access to career exploration and advising opportunities to help students make informed decisions about their postsecondary enrollment decisions and to place them on a career path. Invitational Priority: For FY 2023 and any subsequent year in which we make E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1 23648 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices awards from the list of unfunded applications from this competition, this priority is an invitational priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1), we do not give an application that meets this invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over other applicants. This priority is: Projects that support activities to strengthen and institutionalize Native language preservation and revitalization. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Note: Applicants must include in the onepage abstract submitted with the application a statement indicating whether they are addressing competitive preference priority 1, competitive preference priority 2, the invitational priority, any combination of these priorities, or all of these priorities. If the applicant has addressed the priorities, this information also must be listed on the ANNH Program Profile form in the application booklet. Definitions: The definitions below apply to this competition and are from 20 U.S.C. 1059d, 20 U.S.C. 7517, 20 U.S.C. 7546, 43 U.S.C. 1602, 34 CFR 77.1, and the Supplemental Priorities. Alaska Native has the meaning given the term in section 6306 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Alaska Native-serving institution means an institution of higher education that— (A) is an eligible institution under section 1058(b) of title 20; and (B) at the time of application, has an enrollment of undergraduate students that is at least 20 percent Alaska Native students. Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in the project’s logic model is informed by research or evaluation findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve relevant outcomes. Fiscal Year means the Federal fiscal year—a period beginning on October 1 and ending on the following September 30. Grantee means the legal entity to which a grant is awarded and that is accountable to the Federal Government for the use of the funds provided. The grantee is the entire legal entity even if only a particular component of the entity is designated in the grant award notice (GAN). For example, a GAN may name as the grantee one school or campus of a university. In this case, the granting agency usually intends, or actually intends, that the named component assume primary or sole responsibility for administering the grant-assisted project or program. Nevertheless, the naming of a component of a legal entity as the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 259001 grantee in a grant award document shall not be construed as relieving the whole legal entity from accountability to the Federal Government for the use of the funds provided. (This definition is not intended to affect the eligibility provision of grant programs in which eligibility is limited to organizations that may be only components of a legal entity.) The term ‘‘grantee’’ does not include any secondary recipients, such as subgrantees and contractors, that may receive funds from a grantee pursuant to a subgrant or contract. Logic model (also referred to as theory of action) means a framework that identifies key project components of the proposed project (i.e., the active ‘‘ingredients’’ that are hypothesized to be critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the theoretical and operational relationships among the key project components and relevant outcomes. Note: In developing logic models, applicants may want to use resources such as the Regional Educational Laboratory Program’s (REL Pacific) Education Logic Model Application User Guide, available at the ELM Application (ed.gov). Other sources include: Logic models: A tool for effective program planning, collaboration, and monitoring (ed.gov), Logic models: A tool for designing and monitoring program evaluations (ed.gov), and Logic models for program design, implementation, and evaluation: Workshop toolkit (ed.gov). Native means a citizen of the United States who is a person of one-fourth degree or more Alaska Indian (including Tsimshian Indians not enrolled in the Metlaktla Indian Community) Eskimo, or Aleut blood, or combination thereof. The term includes any Native as so defined either or both of whose adoptive parents are not Natives. It also includes, in the absence of proof of a minimum blood quantum, any citizen of the United States who is regarded as an Alaska Native by the Native village or Native group of which he claims to be a member and whose father or mother is (or, if deceased, was) regarded as Native by any village or group. Any decision of the Secretary regarding eligibility for enrollment shall be final. Native Hawaiian means any individual who is— (A) a citizen of the United States; and (B) a descendant of the aboriginal people who, prior to 1778, occupied and exercised sovereignty in the area that now comprises the State of Hawaii, as evidenced by— (i) genealogical records; (ii) Kupuna (elders) or Kamaaina (long-term community residents) verification; or (iii) certified birth records. PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Native Hawaiian-serving institution means an institution of higher education which— (A) is an eligible institution under section 1058(b) of title 20; and (B) at the time of application, has an enrollment of undergraduate students that is at least 10 percent Native Hawaiian students. Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention, process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers). Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s) the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the specific goals of the program. Underserved student means a student in one or more of the following subgroups: (a) A student who is living in poverty or is served by schools with high concentrations of students living in poverty. (b) A student of color. (c) A student who is a member of a federally recognized Indian Tribe. (d) An English learner. (e) A child or student with a disability. (f) A lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, or intersex (LGBTQI+) student. (g) A pregnant, parenting, or caregiving student. (h) A student impacted by the justice system, including a formerly incarcerated student. (i) A student who is the first in their family to attend postsecondary education. (j) A student enrolling in or seeking to enroll in postsecondary education for the first time at the age of 20 or older. (k) A student who is working full-time while enrolled in postsecondary education. (l) A student who is enrolled in or is seeking to enroll in postsecondary education who is eligible for a Pell Grant. (m) An adult student in need of improving their basic skills or an adult student with limited English proficiency. (n) A military- or veteran-connected student. Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1059d. Note: In 2008, the HEA was amended by the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA), Public Law 110–315. Please note that the regulations for ANNH in 34 CFR part 607 have not been updated to reflect E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices these statutory changes. The statute supersedes all other regulations. Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice. Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in the Federal civil rights laws. Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 607. (e) The Supplemental Priorities. II. Award Information Type of Award: Discretionary grants. Five-year Individual Development Grants and Cooperative Arrangement Development Grants will be awarded in FY 2023. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Note: A cooperative arrangement is an arrangement to carry out allowable grant activities between an institution eligible to receive a grant under this part and another eligible or ineligible IHE, under which the resources of the cooperating institutions are combined and shared to better achieve the purposes of this part and avoid costly duplication of effort. Estimated Available Funds: $11,771,979. Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from the list of unfunded applications from this competition. Individual Development Grants: Estimated Range of Awards: $850,000–$900,000 per year. Estimated Average Size of Awards: $875,000 per year. Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $900,000 for a single budget period of 12 months. Estimated Number of Awards: 2. Cooperative Arrangement Development Grants: Estimated Range of Awards: $950,000–$1,000,000 per year. Estimated Average Size of Awards: $975,000 per year. Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $1,000,000 for a single budget period of 12 months. Estimated Number of Awards: 10. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 259001 Project Period: Up to 60 months. III. Eligibility Information 1. a. Eligible Applicants: This program is authorized by title III, part A, of the HEA. At the time of submission of their applications, applicants must certify that an Alaska Native-serving institution has an enrollment of undergraduate students that are at least 20 percent Alaska Native students or that a Native Hawaiian-serving institution has an enrollment of undergraduate students that is at least 10 percent Native Hawaiian students. An assurance form, which is included in the application materials for this competition, must be signed by an official for the applicant and submitted with this application. To qualify as an eligible institution under the ANNH Program, an institution also must— (i) Be accredited or preaccredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association that the Secretary has determined to be a reliable authority as to the quality of education or training offered; (ii) Be legally authorized by the State in which it is located to be a junior or community college or to provide an educational program for which it awards a bachelor’s degree; (iii) Demonstrate that it (1) has an enrollment of needy students as described in 34 CFR 607.3; and (2) has low average education and general expenditures per full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduate student as described in 34 CFR 607.4. Note: The notice announcing the FY 2023 process for designation of eligible institutions, and inviting applications for waiver of eligibility requirements, was published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2023 (88 FR 2611). Only institutions that the Department determines are eligible, or which are granted a waiver under the process described in that notice, may apply for a grant in this program. b. Relationship between the Title III, Part A Programs and the Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) Program: A grantee under the HSI Program, which is authorized under title V of the HEA, may not receive a grant under any HEA, title III, part A program. 20 U.S.C. 1101d. The title III, part A programs are the Strengthening Institutions Program, the ANNH program, the Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities Program, the Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-Serving Institutions Program, the Predominantly Black Institutions Program, and the Native American-Serving Nontribal Institutions PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 23649 Program. Furthermore, a current title III, Part A or title V program grantee may not give up its grant to receive a grant under SIP, as described in 34 CFR 607.2(g)(1). An eligible IHE that is not a current grantee under the above-cited programs may apply for a FY 2023 grant under all title III, part A programs for which it is eligible, as well as receive consideration for a grant under the HSI program. However, a successful applicant may receive only one grant, as described in 34 CFR 607.2(g)(1). c. Individual Development and Cooperative Arrangement Grants: An eligible IHE that submits applications for an Individual Development Grant and a Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant in this competition may be awarded both in the same fiscal year. However, we will not award a second Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant as the lead institution to an otherwise eligible IHE for an award year for which the IHE already has a Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant as the lead institution under the ANNH Program. A grantee with an Individual Development Grant or a Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant may be a partner in one or more Cooperative Arrangement Development Grants. The lead institution in a Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant must be an eligible institution. Partners are not required to be eligible institutions. 2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost sharing or matching. b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-notsupplant funding requirements. Grant funds must be used so that they supplement and, to the extent practical, increase the funds that would otherwise be available for the activities to be carried out under the grant and in no case supplant those funds (34 CFR 607.30(b)). 3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities described in its application. IV. Application and Submission Information 1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045), and available at www.federalregister.gov/d/ 2022-26554, which contain requirements and information on how to submit an application. Please note that E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 23650 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices these Common Instructions supersede the version published on December 27, 2021. 2. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this program. 3. Funding Restrictions: We specify unallowable costs in 34 CFR 607.10(c). We reference additional regulations outlining funding restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. 4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the application narrative to no more than 55 pages for Individual Development Grants and to no more than 75 pages for Cooperative Arrangement Development Grants and (2) use the following standards below. If you are addressing one or more priorities, we recommend that you limit your response to no more than an additional 15 pages total, 5 additional pages for Competitive Preference Priority 1, 5 additional pages for Competitive Preference Priority 2 and 5 additional pages for the Invitational Priority. Please include a separate heading when responding to one or more competitive or invitational priorities. • A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom, and both sides. • Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in charts, tables, figures, and graphs. • Use a font that is either 12 point or larger and no smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch). • Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial. The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract and the bibliography. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of the application narrative. Note: The Budget Information NonConstruction Programs form (ED 524) sections A–C are not the same as the narrative response to the Budget section of the selection criteria. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 259001 V. Application Review Information 1. Selection Criteria: The following selection criteria for this competition are from 34 CFR 607.22(a) through (g) and 34 CFR 75.210. Applicants should address each of the following selection criteria separately for each proposed activity. The selection criteria are worth a total of 100 points. The maximum score for each criterion is noted in parentheses. An applicant that also chooses to address the competitive preference priorities can earn up to 110 total points. (a) Quality of the applicant’s comprehensive development plan. (Up to 20 points) The extent to which— (1) The strengths, weaknesses, and significant problems of the institution’s academic programs, institutional management, and fiscal stability are clearly and comprehensively analyzed and result from a process that involved major constituencies of the institution. (5 points) (2) The goals for the institution’s academic programs, institutional management, and fiscal stability are realistic and based on comprehensive analysis. (5 points) (3) The objectives stated in the plan are measurable, related to institutional goals, and, if achieved, will contribute to the growth and self-sufficiency of the institution. (5 points) (4) The plan clearly and comprehensively describes the methods and resources the institution will use to institutionalize practice and improvements developed under the proposed project, including, in particular, how operational costs for personnel, maintenance, and upgrades of equipment will be paid with institutional resources. (5 points) (b) Quality of activity objectives. (Up to 15 points) The extent to which the objectives for each activity are— (1) Realistic and defined in terms of measurable results. (8 points) (2) Directly related to the problems to be solved and to the goals of the comprehensive development plan. (7 points) (c) Quality of the project design. (Up to 12 points) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factor: (1) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a rationale. (d) Quality of implementation strategy. (Up to 16 points) The extent to which— PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (1) The implementation strategy for each activity is comprehensive. (6 points) (2) The rationale for the implementation strategy for each activity is clearly described and is supported by the results of relevant studies or projects. (6 points) (3) The timetable for each activity is realistic and likely to be attained. (4 points) (e) Quality of key personnel. (Up to 8 points) The extent to which— (1) The past experience and training of key professional personnel are directly related to the stated activity objectives. (4 points) (2) The time commitment of key personnel is realistic. (4 points) (f) Quality of project management plan. (Up to 10 points) The extent to which— (1) Procedures for managing the project are likely to ensure efficient and effective project implementation. (5 points) (2) The project coordinator and activity directors have sufficient authority to conduct the project effectively, including access to the president or chief executive officer. (5 points) (g) Quality of evaluation plan. (Up to 12 points) The extent to which— (1) The data elements and the data collection procedures are clearly described and appropriate to measure the attainment of activity objectives and to measure the success of the project in achieving the goals of the comprehensive development plan. (6 points) (2) The data analysis procedures are clearly described and are likely to produce formative and summative results on attaining activity objectives and measuring the success of the project on achieving the goals of the comprehensive development plan. (6 points) (h) Budget. (Up to 7 points) The extent to which the proposed costs are necessary and reasonable in relation to the project’s objectives and scope. 2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as the applicant’s use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices submit a timely performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable quality. In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23). A panel of three non-Federal reviewers will review and score each application in accordance with the selection criteria and the competitive preference priorities. A rank order funding slate will be made from this review. Awards will be made in rank order according to the average score received from the peer review. In tie-breaking situations for development grants, 34 CFR 607.23(b) requires that we award additional points in the following three areas. For purposes of this program, we award one additional point to an application from an IHE that has an endowment fund of which the current market value, per full-time equivalent enrolled student, is less than the average current market value of the endowment funds, per FTE enrolled student, at comparable type institutions that offer similar instruction. We award one additional point to an application from an IHE that has expenditures for library materials per FTE enrolled student that are less than the average expenditure for library materials per FTE enrolled student at similar type institutions. We also add one additional point to an application from an IHE that proposes to carry out one or more of the following activities— (1) Faculty development; (2) Funds and administrative management; (3) Development and improvement of academic programs; (4) Acquisition of equipment for use in strengthening management and academic programs; (5) Joint use of facilities; and (6) Student services. For the purpose of these funding considerations, we use 2020–2021 data. If a tie remains after applying the tiebreaker mechanism above, priority will be given to applicants that have the lowest endowment values per FTE enrolled student. 3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 200.206, before awarding grants under this program the Department conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR 3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 259001 grant if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible. 4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this competition to receive an award that over the course of the project period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2), we must make a judgment about your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards—that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant—before we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS. Please note that, if the total value of your currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal funds you receive exceed $10,000,000. 5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and Budget’s guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting applications in accordance with: (a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering results based on the program objectives through an objective process of evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205); (b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115–232) (2 CFR 200.216); (c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United States (2 CFR 200.322); and PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 23651 (d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340). VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, also. If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, we notify you. 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify administrative and national policy requirements in the application package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also incorporates your approved application as part of your binding commitments under the grant. 3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works. Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables. This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR 3474.20. 4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b). (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final performance report, including financial information, E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 23652 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices as directed by the Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/ fund/grant/apply/appforms/ appforms.html. 5. Performance Measures: The Secretary has established the following key performance measures for the purpose of Department reporting under 34 CFR 75.110. (a) The percentage change, over the 5year period, of the number of full-time degree-seeking undergraduates enrolled at Alaska Native and Native HawaiianServing Institutions (Note: This is a long-term measure, which will be used to periodically gauge performance); (b) The percentage of first-time, fulltime degree-seeking undergraduate students at 4-year Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions who were in their first year of postsecondary enrollment in the previous year and are enrolled in the current year at the same Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institution; (c) The percentage of first-time, fulltime degree-seeking undergraduate students at 2-year Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions who were in their first year of postsecondary enrollment in the previous year and are enrolled in the current year at the same Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institution; (d) The percentage of first-time, fulltime degree-seeking undergraduate students enrolled at 4-year Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions who graduate within 6 years of enrollment; and (e) The percentage of first-time, fulltime degree-seeking undergraduate students enrolled at 2-year Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions who graduate within 3 years of enrollment. 6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, whether the grantee has VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 259001 made substantial progress in achieving the performance targets in the grantee’s approved application. In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23). VII. Other Information Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format. Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. Nasser H. Paydar, Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education. [FR Doc. 2023–08094 Filed 4–17–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Notice Inviting Postsecondary Educational Institutions To Participate in Experiments Under the Experimental Sites Initiative; Federal Student Financial Assistance Programs Under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as Amended Federal Student Aid, Department of Education. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ACTION: Notice. The Secretary invites postsecondary educational institutions (institutions) that currently participate in the Second Chance Pell experiment to apply to participate in a revised Second Chance Pell institution-based experiment under the Experimental Sites Initiative (ESI). DATES: Letters of application to participate in the revised experiment described in this notice must be received by the Department of Education (the Department) no later than May 18, 2023. Letters of interest received after May 18, 2023 may still, at the discretion of the Secretary, be considered for participation. ADDRESSES: Letters of interest must be submitted by electronic mail to the following email address: experimentalsites@ed.gov. For formats and other required information, see ‘‘Instructions for Submitting Letters of Interest’’ under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn Rose, U.S. Department of Education, Federal Student Aid, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 803–1502. Email: Carolyn.Rose@ed.gov. If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7–1–1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Instructions for Submitting Letters of Interest: Letters of interest should take the form of an Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) attachment to an email message sent to the email address provided in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. The subject line of the email should read ‘‘ESI 2023— Pell for Students Who Are Incarcerated.’’ The text of the email should include the name and address of the institution. The letter of interest should be on institutional letterhead and be signed by the institution’s financial aid administrator. The letter of interest must include the institution’s official name and the Department’s Office of Postsecondary Education Identification (OPEID) number, the name of a contact person at the institution, including a mailing address, email address, and telephone number, as well as the name and address of the correctional facility(ies) with which the institution partners. Please include in the letter a listing of the academic programs that the institution is offering under the current experiment and that the institution expects to include in the revised experiment. For each of those SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM 18APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23647-23652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08094]



[[Page 23647]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Applications for New Awards; Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-
Serving Institutions Program, Part A

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice 
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2023 for the 
Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions (ANNH) Program, 
Part A, Assistance Listing Numbers 84.031N (Alaska Native) and 84.031W 
(Native Hawaiian). This notice relates to the approved information 
collection under OMB control number 1840-0810.

DATES: 
    Applications Available: April 18, 2023.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 20, 2023.
    Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 16, 2023.

ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an 
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to 
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the 
Federal Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045) and available at 
www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-26554. Please note that these Common 
Instructions supersede the version published on December 27, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robyn Wood, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 2B203, Washington, DC 20202-
4260. Telephone: (202) 987-1577. Email: ed.gov">[email protected]ed.gov.
    If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and 
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Full Text of Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    Purpose of Program: The ANNH Program provides grants to eligible 
institutions of higher education (IHEs) to enable them to improve and 
expand their capacity to serve Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian 
students. Institutions may use these grants to plan, develop, or 
implement activities that strengthen the institution.
    Background:
    Students' sense of belonging impacts postsecondary retention.\1\ 
Creating that sense of belonging begins with ensuring the institution's 
ability to serve students well. Research shows that institutional 
belonging predicts better persistence, engagement, and mental health 
for enrolled students.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Davis, G.M., Hanzsek-Brill, M.B., Petzold, M.C., and 
Robinson, D.H., ``Students' Sense of Belonging: The Development of a 
Predictive Retention Model.'' Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching 
and Learning, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 117-27 (Feb. 2019).
    \2\ Gopalan, M., & Brady, S.T. (2020). College Students' Sense 
of Belonging: A National Perspective. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 
134-137. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0013189X19897622.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Mental health concerns for college students have increased due to a 
growing number of student exposures to trauma and disruptions in 
learning and disengagement from school and peers.\3\ Studies indicate 
that the mental health of Alaska Native students has seen the largest 
decline since 2016, and both Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian students 
reported significant increases in mental health issues during the 
COVID-19 pandemic.\4\ Implementing or expanding institutional capacity 
to provide mental health and other services that help support students' 
social, emotional, and academic needs also supports student retention.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/10/mental-health-campus-care.
    \4\ https://www.bu.edu/articles/2022/mental-health-of-college-students-is-getting-worse/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Through this grant program, the Department encourages Alaska Native 
and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions to develop, create, or enhance 
programs that foster students' sense of belonging and to implement 
services that will help students complete their degree programs. 
Through the competitive preference priorities for this grant 
competition, the Department invites applicants to submit proposals to 
provide high-quality learning, improve student engagement, and meet the 
needs of Native students.
    Priorities: This notice contains two competitive preference 
priorities and one invitational priority. The competitive preference 
priorities are from the Secretary's Supplemental Priorities and 
Definitions for Discretionary Grants Programs, published in the Federal 
Register on December 10, 2021 (86 FR 70612) (Supplemental Priorities). 
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2023 and any subsequent year 
in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this 
competition, these priorities are competitive preference priorities. 
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 5 points to 
an application for each priority, depending on how well the application 
meets the priorities. Applicants may respond to one or both priorities, 
for a total of up to 10 additional points.
    These priorities are:
    Competitive Preference Priority 1: Meeting Student Social, 
Emotional, and Academic Needs (up to 5 points).
    Projects that are designed to improve students' social, emotional, 
academic, and career development, with a focus on underserved students 
(as defined in this notice), by creating a positive, inclusive, and 
identity-safe climate at IHEs through one or more of the following 
activities:
    (a) Fostering a sense of belonging and inclusion for underserved 
students.
    (b) Implementing evidence-based practices for advancing student 
success for underserved students.
    Competitive Preference Priority 2: Increasing Postsecondary 
Education Access, Affordability, Completion, and Post-Enrollment 
Success (up to 5 points).
    Projects that are designed to increase postsecondary access, 
affordability, completion, and success for underserved students by 
addressing one or more of the following priority areas:
    (a) Increasing the number and proportion of underserved students 
who enroll in and complete postsecondary education programs, which may 
include strategies related to college preparation, awareness, 
application, selection, advising, counseling, and enrollment.
    (b) Supporting the development and implementation of student 
success programs that integrate multiple comprehensive and evidence-
based services or initiatives, such as academic advising, structured/
guided pathways, career services, credit-bearing academic undergraduate 
courses focused on career, and programs to meet basic needs, such as 
housing, childcare, transportation, student financial aid, and access 
to technological devices.

    Note: Under 34 CFR 607.10(c)(13), grantees may not use funds 
awarded under this program to pay directly for childcare and 
transportation expenses.

    (c) Supporting the development and implementation of high-quality 
and accessible learning opportunities, including learning opportunities 
that are accelerated or hybrid online; credit-bearing; work-based; and 
flexible for working students.
    (d) Providing secondary school students with access to career 
exploration and advising opportunities to help students make informed 
decisions about their postsecondary enrollment decisions and to place 
them on a career path.
    Invitational Priority: For FY 2023 and any subsequent year in which 
we make

[[Page 23648]]

awards from the list of unfunded applications from this competition, 
this priority is an invitational priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1), 
we do not give an application that meets this invitational priority a 
competitive or absolute preference over other applicants.
    This priority is:
    Projects that support activities to strengthen and institutionalize 
Native language preservation and revitalization.

    Note: Applicants must include in the one-page abstract submitted 
with the application a statement indicating whether they are 
addressing competitive preference priority 1, competitive preference 
priority 2, the invitational priority, any combination of these 
priorities, or all of these priorities. If the applicant has 
addressed the priorities, this information also must be listed on 
the ANNH Program Profile form in the application booklet.

    Definitions: The definitions below apply to this competition and 
are from 20 U.S.C. 1059d, 20 U.S.C. 7517, 20 U.S.C. 7546, 43 U.S.C. 
1602, 34 CFR 77.1, and the Supplemental Priorities.
    Alaska Native has the meaning given the term in section 6306 of the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.
    Alaska Native-serving institution means an institution of higher 
education that--
    (A) is an eligible institution under section 1058(b) of title 20; 
and
    (B) at the time of application, has an enrollment of undergraduate 
students that is at least 20 percent Alaska Native students.
    Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in 
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation 
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve 
relevant outcomes.
    Fiscal Year means the Federal fiscal year--a period beginning on 
October 1 and ending on the following September 30.
    Grantee means the legal entity to which a grant is awarded and that 
is accountable to the Federal Government for the use of the funds 
provided. The grantee is the entire legal entity even if only a 
particular component of the entity is designated in the grant award 
notice (GAN). For example, a GAN may name as the grantee one school or 
campus of a university. In this case, the granting agency usually 
intends, or actually intends, that the named component assume primary 
or sole responsibility for administering the grant-assisted project or 
program. Nevertheless, the naming of a component of a legal entity as 
the grantee in a grant award document shall not be construed as 
relieving the whole legal entity from accountability to the Federal 
Government for the use of the funds provided. (This definition is not 
intended to affect the eligibility provision of grant programs in which 
eligibility is limited to organizations that may be only components of 
a legal entity.) The term ``grantee'' does not include any secondary 
recipients, such as subgrantees and contractors, that may receive funds 
from a grantee pursuant to a subgrant or contract.
    Logic model (also referred to as theory of action) means a 
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed 
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be 
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the 
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project 
components and relevant outcomes.

    Note: In developing logic models, applicants may want to use 
resources such as the Regional Educational Laboratory Program's (REL 
Pacific) Education Logic Model Application User Guide, available at 
the ELM Application (ed.gov). Other sources include: Logic models: A 
tool for effective program planning, collaboration, and monitoring 
(ed.gov), Logic models: A tool for designing and monitoring program 
evaluations (ed.gov), and Logic models for program design, 
implementation, and evaluation: Workshop toolkit (ed.gov).

    Native means a citizen of the United States who is a person of one-
fourth degree or more Alaska Indian (including Tsimshian Indians not 
enrolled in the Metlaktla Indian Community) Eskimo, or Aleut blood, or 
combination thereof. The term includes any Native as so defined either 
or both of whose adoptive parents are not Natives. It also includes, in 
the absence of proof of a minimum blood quantum, any citizen of the 
United States who is regarded as an Alaska Native by the Native village 
or Native group of which he claims to be a member and whose father or 
mother is (or, if deceased, was) regarded as Native by any village or 
group. Any decision of the Secretary regarding eligibility for 
enrollment shall be final.
    Native Hawaiian means any individual who is--
    (A) a citizen of the United States; and
    (B) a descendant of the aboriginal people who, prior to 1778, 
occupied and exercised sovereignty in the area that now comprises the 
State of Hawaii, as evidenced by--
    (i) genealogical records;
    (ii) Kupuna (elders) or Kamaaina (long-term community residents) 
verification; or
    (iii) certified birth records.
    Native Hawaiian-serving institution means an institution of higher 
education which--
    (A) is an eligible institution under section 1058(b) of title 20; 
and
    (B) at the time of application, has an enrollment of undergraduate 
students that is at least 10 percent Native Hawaiian students.
    Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention, 
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence 
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of 
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices 
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
    Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s) 
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the 
specific goals of the program.
    Underserved student means a student in one or more of the following 
subgroups:
    (a) A student who is living in poverty or is served by schools with 
high concentrations of students living in poverty.
    (b) A student of color.
    (c) A student who is a member of a federally recognized Indian 
Tribe.
    (d) An English learner.
    (e) A child or student with a disability.
    (f) A lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, or 
intersex (LGBTQI+) student.
    (g) A pregnant, parenting, or caregiving student.
    (h) A student impacted by the justice system, including a formerly 
incarcerated student.
    (i) A student who is the first in their family to attend 
postsecondary education.
    (j) A student enrolling in or seeking to enroll in postsecondary 
education for the first time at the age of 20 or older.
    (k) A student who is working full-time while enrolled in 
postsecondary education.
    (l) A student who is enrolled in or is seeking to enroll in 
postsecondary education who is eligible for a Pell Grant.
    (m) An adult student in need of improving their basic skills or an 
adult student with limited English proficiency.
    (n) A military- or veteran-connected student.
    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1059d.

    Note: In 2008, the HEA was amended by the Higher Education 
Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA), Public Law 110-315. Please note that 
the regulations for ANNH in 34 CFR part 607 have not been updated to 
reflect

[[Page 23649]]

these statutory changes. The statute supersedes all other 
regulations.


    Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner 
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in the 
Federal civil rights laws.

    Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 
98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to 
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department 
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost 
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR 
part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 607. (e) 
The Supplemental Priorities.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Discretionary grants. Five-year Individual 
Development Grants and Cooperative Arrangement Development Grants will 
be awarded in FY 2023.

    Note: A cooperative arrangement is an arrangement to carry out 
allowable grant activities between an institution eligible to 
receive a grant under this part and another eligible or ineligible 
IHE, under which the resources of the cooperating institutions are 
combined and shared to better achieve the purposes of this part and 
avoid costly duplication of effort.

    Estimated Available Funds: $11,771,979.
    Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of 
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from 
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
    Individual Development Grants:
    Estimated Range of Awards: $850,000-$900,000 per year.
    Estimated Average Size of Awards: $875,000 per year.
    Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $900,000 for a 
single budget period of 12 months.
    Estimated Number of Awards: 2.
    Cooperative Arrangement Development Grants:
    Estimated Range of Awards: $950,000-$1,000,000 per year.
    Estimated Average Size of Awards: $975,000 per year.
    Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $1,000,000 for a 
single budget period of 12 months.
    Estimated Number of Awards: 10.

    Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this 
notice.

    Project Period: Up to 60 months.

III. Eligibility Information

    1. a. Eligible Applicants: This program is authorized by title III, 
part A, of the HEA. At the time of submission of their applications, 
applicants must certify that an Alaska Native-serving institution has 
an enrollment of undergraduate students that are at least 20 percent 
Alaska Native students or that a Native Hawaiian-serving institution 
has an enrollment of undergraduate students that is at least 10 percent 
Native Hawaiian students. An assurance form, which is included in the 
application materials for this competition, must be signed by an 
official for the applicant and submitted with this application.
    To qualify as an eligible institution under the ANNH Program, an 
institution also must--
    (i) Be accredited or preaccredited by a nationally recognized 
accrediting agency or association that the Secretary has determined to 
be a reliable authority as to the quality of education or training 
offered;
    (ii) Be legally authorized by the State in which it is located to 
be a junior or community college or to provide an educational program 
for which it awards a bachelor's degree;
    (iii) Demonstrate that it (1) has an enrollment of needy students 
as described in 34 CFR 607.3; and (2) has low average education and 
general expenditures per full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduate 
student as described in 34 CFR 607.4.

    Note: The notice announcing the FY 2023 process for designation 
of eligible institutions, and inviting applications for waiver of 
eligibility requirements, was published in the Federal Register on 
January 17, 2023 (88 FR 2611). Only institutions that the Department 
determines are eligible, or which are granted a waiver under the 
process described in that notice, may apply for a grant in this 
program.

    b. Relationship between the Title III, Part A Programs and the 
Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) Program: A grantee under 
the HSI Program, which is authorized under title V of the HEA, may not 
receive a grant under any HEA, title III, part A program. 20 U.S.C. 
1101d. The title III, part A programs are the Strengthening 
Institutions Program, the ANNH program, the Tribally Controlled 
Colleges and Universities Program, the Asian American and Native 
American Pacific Islander-Serving Institutions Program, the 
Predominantly Black Institutions Program, and the Native American-
Serving Nontribal Institutions Program. Furthermore, a current title 
III, Part A or title V program grantee may not give up its grant to 
receive a grant under SIP, as described in 34 CFR 607.2(g)(1).
    An eligible IHE that is not a current grantee under the above-cited 
programs may apply for a FY 2023 grant under all title III, part A 
programs for which it is eligible, as well as receive consideration for 
a grant under the HSI program. However, a successful applicant may 
receive only one grant, as described in 34 CFR 607.2(g)(1).
    c. Individual Development and Cooperative Arrangement Grants: An 
eligible IHE that submits applications for an Individual Development 
Grant and a Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant in this 
competition may be awarded both in the same fiscal year. However, we 
will not award a second Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant as 
the lead institution to an otherwise eligible IHE for an award year for 
which the IHE already has a Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant 
as the lead institution under the ANNH Program. A grantee with an 
Individual Development Grant or a Cooperative Arrangement Development 
Grant may be a partner in one or more Cooperative Arrangement 
Development Grants. The lead institution in a Cooperative Arrangement 
Development Grant must be an eligible institution. Partners are not 
required to be eligible institutions.
    2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost 
sharing or matching.
    b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-not-
supplant funding requirements. Grant funds must be used so that they 
supplement and, to the extent practical, increase the funds that would 
otherwise be available for the activities to be carried out under the 
grant and in no case supplant those funds (34 CFR 607.30(b)).
    3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award 
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities 
described in its application.

IV. Application and Submission Information

    1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to 
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of 
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal 
Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045), and available at 
www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-26554, which contain requirements and 
information on how to submit an application. Please note that

[[Page 23650]]

these Common Instructions supersede the version published on December 
27, 2021.
    2. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive 
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about 
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order 
12372 is in the application package for this program.
    3. Funding Restrictions: We specify unallowable costs in 34 CFR 
607.10(c). We reference additional regulations outlining funding 
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
    4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, 
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to 
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the 
application narrative to no more than 55 pages for Individual 
Development Grants and to no more than 75 pages for Cooperative 
Arrangement Development Grants and (2) use the following standards 
below. If you are addressing one or more priorities, we recommend that 
you limit your response to no more than an additional 15 pages total, 5 
additional pages for Competitive Preference Priority 1, 5 additional 
pages for Competitive Preference Priority 2 and 5 additional pages for 
the Invitational Priority. Please include a separate heading when 
responding to one or more competitive or invitational priorities.
     A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1'' 
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
     Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) 
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, 
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in 
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
     Use a font that is either 12 point or larger and no 
smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
     Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, 
Courier New, or Arial.
    The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the 
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the 
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract and the 
bibliography. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of 
the application narrative.

    Note: The Budget Information Non-Construction Programs form (ED 
524) sections A-C are not the same as the narrative response to the 
Budget section of the selection criteria.

V. Application Review Information

    1. Selection Criteria: The following selection criteria for this 
competition are from 34 CFR 607.22(a) through (g) and 34 CFR 75.210. 
Applicants should address each of the following selection criteria 
separately for each proposed activity. The selection criteria are worth 
a total of 100 points. The maximum score for each criterion is noted in 
parentheses. An applicant that also chooses to address the competitive 
preference priorities can earn up to 110 total points.
    (a) Quality of the applicant's comprehensive development plan. (Up 
to 20 points)
    The extent to which--
    (1) The strengths, weaknesses, and significant problems of the 
institution's academic programs, institutional management, and fiscal 
stability are clearly and comprehensively analyzed and result from a 
process that involved major constituencies of the institution. (5 
points)
    (2) The goals for the institution's academic programs, 
institutional management, and fiscal stability are realistic and based 
on comprehensive analysis. (5 points)
    (3) The objectives stated in the plan are measurable, related to 
institutional goals, and, if achieved, will contribute to the growth 
and self-sufficiency of the institution. (5 points)
    (4) The plan clearly and comprehensively describes the methods and 
resources the institution will use to institutionalize practice and 
improvements developed under the proposed project, including, in 
particular, how operational costs for personnel, maintenance, and 
upgrades of equipment will be paid with institutional resources. (5 
points)
    (b) Quality of activity objectives. (Up to 15 points)
    The extent to which the objectives for each activity are--
    (1) Realistic and defined in terms of measurable results. (8 
points)
    (2) Directly related to the problems to be solved and to the goals 
of the comprehensive development plan. (7 points)
    (c) Quality of the project design. (Up to 12 points)
    The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed 
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed 
project, the Secretary considers the following factor:
    (1) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a 
rationale.
    (d) Quality of implementation strategy. (Up to 16 points)
    The extent to which--
    (1) The implementation strategy for each activity is comprehensive. 
(6 points)
    (2) The rationale for the implementation strategy for each activity 
is clearly described and is supported by the results of relevant 
studies or projects. (6 points)
    (3) The timetable for each activity is realistic and likely to be 
attained. (4 points)
    (e) Quality of key personnel. (Up to 8 points)
    The extent to which--
    (1) The past experience and training of key professional personnel 
are directly related to the stated activity objectives. (4 points)
    (2) The time commitment of key personnel is realistic. (4 points)
    (f) Quality of project management plan. (Up to 10 points)
    The extent to which--
    (1) Procedures for managing the project are likely to ensure 
efficient and effective project implementation. (5 points)
    (2) The project coordinator and activity directors have sufficient 
authority to conduct the project effectively, including access to the 
president or chief executive officer. (5 points)
    (g) Quality of evaluation plan. (Up to 12 points)
    The extent to which--
    (1) The data elements and the data collection procedures are 
clearly described and appropriate to measure the attainment of activity 
objectives and to measure the success of the project in achieving the 
goals of the comprehensive development plan. (6 points)
    (2) The data analysis procedures are clearly described and are 
likely to produce formative and summative results on attaining activity 
objectives and measuring the success of the project on achieving the 
goals of the comprehensive development plan. (6 points)
    (h) Budget. (Up to 7 points)
    The extent to which the proposed costs are necessary and reasonable 
in relation to the project's objectives and scope.
    2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants 
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, 
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past 
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as 
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and 
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider 
whether the applicant failed to

[[Page 23651]]

submit a timely performance report or submitted a report of 
unacceptable quality.
    In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary 
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal 
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or 
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department 
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
    A panel of three non-Federal reviewers will review and score each 
application in accordance with the selection criteria and the 
competitive preference priorities. A rank order funding slate will be 
made from this review. Awards will be made in rank order according to 
the average score received from the peer review.
    In tie-breaking situations for development grants, 34 CFR 607.23(b) 
requires that we award additional points in the following three areas. 
For purposes of this program, we award one additional point to an 
application from an IHE that has an endowment fund of which the current 
market value, per full-time equivalent enrolled student, is less than 
the average current market value of the endowment funds, per FTE 
enrolled student, at comparable type institutions that offer similar 
instruction. We award one additional point to an application from an 
IHE that has expenditures for library materials per FTE enrolled 
student that are less than the average expenditure for library 
materials per FTE enrolled student at similar type institutions. We 
also add one additional point to an application from an IHE that 
proposes to carry out one or more of the following activities--
    (1) Faculty development;
    (2) Funds and administrative management;
    (3) Development and improvement of academic programs;
    (4) Acquisition of equipment for use in strengthening management 
and academic programs;
    (5) Joint use of facilities; and
    (6) Student services.
    For the purpose of these funding considerations, we use 2020-2021 
data.
    If a tie remains after applying the tie-breaker mechanism above, 
priority will be given to applicants that have the lowest endowment 
values per FTE enrolled student.
    3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 
200.206, before awarding grants under this program the Department 
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 
200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR 
3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant 
if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of 
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system 
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not 
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not 
responsible.
    4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this 
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project 
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently 
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2), we must make a judgment about 
your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under 
Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before 
we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about 
you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred 
to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System 
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may 
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal 
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
    Please note that, if the total value of your currently active 
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the 
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity 
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal 
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
    5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and 
Budget's guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal 
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and 
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting 
applications in accordance with:
    (a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering 
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of 
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
    (b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video 
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR 
200.216);
    (c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to 
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United 
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
    (d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest 
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program 
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).

VI. Award Administration Information

    1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your 
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award 
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to 
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, 
also.
    If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, 
we notify you.
    2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify 
administrative and national policy requirements in the application 
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable 
Regulations section of this notice.
    We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of 
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and 
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also 
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding 
commitments under the grant.
    3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you 
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to 
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in 
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of 
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those 
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent 
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or 
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works. 
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant 
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables. 
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your 
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional 
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR 
3474.20.
    4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, 
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and 
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply 
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
    (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final 
performance report, including financial information,

[[Page 23652]]

as directed by the Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you 
must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current 
performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the 
Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more 
frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific 
requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
    5. Performance Measures: The Secretary has established the 
following key performance measures for the purpose of Department 
reporting under 34 CFR 75.110.
    (a) The percentage change, over the 5-year period, of the number of 
full-time degree-seeking undergraduates enrolled at Alaska Native and 
Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions (Note: This is a long-term 
measure, which will be used to periodically gauge performance);
    (b) The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking 
undergraduate students at 4-year Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-
Serving Institutions who were in their first year of postsecondary 
enrollment in the previous year and are enrolled in the current year at 
the same Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institution;
    (c) The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking 
undergraduate students at 2-year Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-
Serving Institutions who were in their first year of postsecondary 
enrollment in the previous year and are enrolled in the current year at 
the same Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institution;
    (d) The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking 
undergraduate students enrolled at 4-year Alaska Native and Native 
Hawaiian-Serving Institutions who graduate within 6 years of 
enrollment; and
    (e) The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking 
undergraduate students enrolled at 2-year Alaska Native and Native 
Hawaiian-Serving Institutions who graduate within 3 years of 
enrollment.
    6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee 
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of 
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is 
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the 
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, whether 
the grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the performance 
targets in the grantee's approved application.
    In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers 
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in 
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil 
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities 
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).

VII. Other Information

    Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities 
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an 
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an 
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text 
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, 
audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this 
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published 
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced feature at 
this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the 
Department.

Nasser H. Paydar,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2023-08094 Filed 4-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.