Applications for New Awards; Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions Program, Part A, 23647-23652 [2023-08094]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Alaska
Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institutions Program, Part A
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
(Department) is issuing a notice inviting
applications for new awards for fiscal
year (FY) 2023 for the Alaska Native and
Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions
(ANNH) Program, Part A, Assistance
Listing Numbers 84.031N (Alaska
Native) and 84.031W (Native Hawaiian).
This notice relates to the approved
information collection under OMB
control number 1840–0810.
DATES:
Applications Available: April 18,
2023.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: June 20, 2023.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: August 16, 2023.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for
obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common
Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on December 7, 2022
(87 FR 75045) and available at
www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-26554.
Please note that these Common
Instructions supersede the version
published on December 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robyn Wood, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 2B203, Washington, DC 20202–
4260. Telephone: (202) 987–1577.
Email: Robyn.Wood@ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability and wish to
access telecommunications relay
services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The ANNH
Program provides grants to eligible
institutions of higher education (IHEs)
to enable them to improve and expand
their capacity to serve Alaska Native
and Native Hawaiian students.
Institutions may use these grants to
plan, develop, or implement activities
that strengthen the institution.
Background:
Students’ sense of belonging impacts
postsecondary retention.1 Creating that
1 Davis, G.M., Hanzsek-Brill, M.B., Petzold, M.C.,
and Robinson, D.H., ‘‘Students’ Sense of Belonging:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
sense of belonging begins with ensuring
the institution’s ability to serve students
well. Research shows that institutional
belonging predicts better persistence,
engagement, and mental health for
enrolled students.2
Mental health concerns for college
students have increased due to a
growing number of student exposures to
trauma and disruptions in learning and
disengagement from school and peers.3
Studies indicate that the mental health
of Alaska Native students has seen the
largest decline since 2016, and both
Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian
students reported significant increases
in mental health issues during the
COVID–19 pandemic.4 Implementing or
expanding institutional capacity to
provide mental health and other
services that help support students’
social, emotional, and academic needs
also supports student retention.
Through this grant program, the
Department encourages Alaska Native
and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institutions to develop, create, or
enhance programs that foster students’
sense of belonging and to implement
services that will help students
complete their degree programs.
Through the competitive preference
priorities for this grant competition, the
Department invites applicants to submit
proposals to provide high-quality
learning, improve student engagement,
and meet the needs of Native students.
Priorities: This notice contains two
competitive preference priorities and
one invitational priority. The
competitive preference priorities are
from the Secretary’s Supplemental
Priorities and Definitions for
Discretionary Grants Programs,
published in the Federal Register on
December 10, 2021 (86 FR 70612)
(Supplemental Priorities). Competitive
Preference Priorities: For FY 2023 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, these
priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i),
we award up to an additional 5 points
to an application for each priority,
depending on how well the application
meets the priorities. Applicants may
The Development of a Predictive Retention Model.’’
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and
Learning, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 117–27 (Feb. 2019).
2 Gopalan, M., & Brady, S.T. (2020). College
Students’ Sense of Belonging: A National
Perspective. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 134–
137. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/
0013189X19897622.
3 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/10/mentalhealth-campus-care.
4 https://www.bu.edu/articles/2022/mentalhealth-of-college-students-is-getting-worse/.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23647
respond to one or both priorities, for a
total of up to 10 additional points.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1:
Meeting Student Social, Emotional, and
Academic Needs (up to 5 points).
Projects that are designed to improve
students’ social, emotional, academic,
and career development, with a focus on
underserved students (as defined in this
notice), by creating a positive, inclusive,
and identity-safe climate at IHEs
through one or more of the following
activities:
(a) Fostering a sense of belonging and
inclusion for underserved students.
(b) Implementing evidence-based
practices for advancing student success
for underserved students.
Competitive Preference Priority 2:
Increasing Postsecondary Education
Access, Affordability, Completion, and
Post-Enrollment Success (up to 5
points).
Projects that are designed to increase
postsecondary access, affordability,
completion, and success for
underserved students by addressing one
or more of the following priority areas:
(a) Increasing the number and
proportion of underserved students who
enroll in and complete postsecondary
education programs, which may include
strategies related to college preparation,
awareness, application, selection,
advising, counseling, and enrollment.
(b) Supporting the development and
implementation of student success
programs that integrate multiple
comprehensive and evidence-based
services or initiatives, such as academic
advising, structured/guided pathways,
career services, credit-bearing academic
undergraduate courses focused on
career, and programs to meet basic
needs, such as housing, childcare,
transportation, student financial aid,
and access to technological devices.
Note: Under 34 CFR 607.10(c)(13), grantees
may not use funds awarded under this
program to pay directly for childcare and
transportation expenses.
(c) Supporting the development and
implementation of high-quality and
accessible learning opportunities,
including learning opportunities that
are accelerated or hybrid online; creditbearing; work-based; and flexible for
working students.
(d) Providing secondary school
students with access to career
exploration and advising opportunities
to help students make informed
decisions about their postsecondary
enrollment decisions and to place them
on a career path.
Invitational Priority: For FY 2023 and
any subsequent year in which we make
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
23648
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition, this
priority is an invitational priority.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1), we do not
give an application that meets this
invitational priority a competitive or
absolute preference over other
applicants.
This priority is:
Projects that support activities to
strengthen and institutionalize Native
language preservation and
revitalization.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Note: Applicants must include in the onepage abstract submitted with the application
a statement indicating whether they are
addressing competitive preference priority 1,
competitive preference priority 2, the
invitational priority, any combination of
these priorities, or all of these priorities. If
the applicant has addressed the priorities,
this information also must be listed on the
ANNH Program Profile form in the
application booklet.
Definitions: The definitions below
apply to this competition and are from
20 U.S.C. 1059d, 20 U.S.C. 7517, 20
U.S.C. 7546, 43 U.S.C. 1602, 34 CFR
77.1, and the Supplemental Priorities.
Alaska Native has the meaning given
the term in section 6306 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965.
Alaska Native-serving institution
means an institution of higher education
that—
(A) is an eligible institution under
section 1058(b) of title 20; and
(B) at the time of application, has an
enrollment of undergraduate students
that is at least 20 percent Alaska Native
students.
Demonstrates a rationale means a key
project component included in the
project’s logic model is informed by
research or evaluation findings that
suggest the project component is likely
to improve relevant outcomes.
Fiscal Year means the Federal fiscal
year—a period beginning on October 1
and ending on the following September
30.
Grantee means the legal entity to
which a grant is awarded and that is
accountable to the Federal Government
for the use of the funds provided. The
grantee is the entire legal entity even if
only a particular component of the
entity is designated in the grant award
notice (GAN). For example, a GAN may
name as the grantee one school or
campus of a university. In this case, the
granting agency usually intends, or
actually intends, that the named
component assume primary or sole
responsibility for administering the
grant-assisted project or program.
Nevertheless, the naming of a
component of a legal entity as the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
grantee in a grant award document shall
not be construed as relieving the whole
legal entity from accountability to the
Federal Government for the use of the
funds provided. (This definition is not
intended to affect the eligibility
provision of grant programs in which
eligibility is limited to organizations
that may be only components of a legal
entity.) The term ‘‘grantee’’ does not
include any secondary recipients, such
as subgrantees and contractors, that may
receive funds from a grantee pursuant to
a subgrant or contract.
Logic model (also referred to as theory
of action) means a framework that
identifies key project components of the
proposed project (i.e., the active
‘‘ingredients’’ that are hypothesized to
be critical to achieving the relevant
outcomes) and describes the theoretical
and operational relationships among the
key project components and relevant
outcomes.
Note: In developing logic models,
applicants may want to use resources such as
the Regional Educational Laboratory
Program’s (REL Pacific) Education Logic
Model Application User Guide, available at
the ELM Application (ed.gov). Other sources
include: Logic models: A tool for effective
program planning, collaboration, and
monitoring (ed.gov), Logic models: A tool for
designing and monitoring program
evaluations (ed.gov), and Logic models for
program design, implementation, and
evaluation: Workshop toolkit (ed.gov).
Native means a citizen of the United
States who is a person of one-fourth
degree or more Alaska Indian (including
Tsimshian Indians not enrolled in the
Metlaktla Indian Community) Eskimo,
or Aleut blood, or combination thereof.
The term includes any Native as so
defined either or both of whose adoptive
parents are not Natives. It also includes,
in the absence of proof of a minimum
blood quantum, any citizen of the
United States who is regarded as an
Alaska Native by the Native village or
Native group of which he claims to be
a member and whose father or mother
is (or, if deceased, was) regarded as
Native by any village or group. Any
decision of the Secretary regarding
eligibility for enrollment shall be final.
Native Hawaiian means any
individual who is—
(A) a citizen of the United States; and
(B) a descendant of the aboriginal
people who, prior to 1778, occupied and
exercised sovereignty in the area that
now comprises the State of Hawaii, as
evidenced by—
(i) genealogical records;
(ii) Kupuna (elders) or Kamaaina
(long-term community residents)
verification; or
(iii) certified birth records.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Native Hawaiian-serving institution
means an institution of higher education
which—
(A) is an eligible institution under
section 1058(b) of title 20; and
(B) at the time of application, has an
enrollment of undergraduate students
that is at least 10 percent Native
Hawaiian students.
Project component means an activity,
strategy, intervention, process, product,
practice, or policy included in a project.
Evidence may pertain to an individual
project component or to a combination
of project components (e.g., training
teachers on instructional practices for
English learners and follow-on coaching
for these teachers).
Relevant outcome means the student
outcome(s) or other outcome(s) the key
project component is designed to
improve, consistent with the specific
goals of the program.
Underserved student means a student
in one or more of the following
subgroups:
(a) A student who is living in poverty
or is served by schools with high
concentrations of students living in
poverty.
(b) A student of color.
(c) A student who is a member of a
federally recognized Indian Tribe.
(d) An English learner.
(e) A child or student with a
disability.
(f) A lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender, queer or questioning, or
intersex (LGBTQI+) student.
(g) A pregnant, parenting, or
caregiving student.
(h) A student impacted by the justice
system, including a formerly
incarcerated student.
(i) A student who is the first in their
family to attend postsecondary
education.
(j) A student enrolling in or seeking to
enroll in postsecondary education for
the first time at the age of 20 or older.
(k) A student who is working full-time
while enrolled in postsecondary
education.
(l) A student who is enrolled in or is
seeking to enroll in postsecondary
education who is eligible for a Pell
Grant.
(m) An adult student in need of
improving their basic skills or an adult
student with limited English
proficiency.
(n) A military- or veteran-connected
student.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1059d.
Note: In 2008, the HEA was amended by
the Higher Education Opportunity Act of
2008 (HEOA), Public Law 110–315. Please
note that the regulations for ANNH in 34 CFR
part 607 have not been updated to reflect
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
these statutory changes. The statute
supersedes all other regulations.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Note: Projects will be awarded and must be
operated in a manner consistent with the
nondiscrimination requirements contained in
the Federal civil rights laws.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and
99. (b) The Office of Management and
Budget Guidelines to Agencies on
Governmentwide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR
part 180, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3485. (c) The Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d)
The regulations for this program in 34
CFR part 607. (e) The Supplemental
Priorities.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Five-year Individual Development
Grants and Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grants will be awarded in
FY 2023.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Note: A cooperative arrangement is an
arrangement to carry out allowable grant
activities between an institution eligible to
receive a grant under this part and another
eligible or ineligible IHE, under which the
resources of the cooperating institutions are
combined and shared to better achieve the
purposes of this part and avoid costly
duplication of effort.
Estimated Available Funds:
$11,771,979.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in
subsequent years from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition.
Individual Development Grants:
Estimated Range of Awards:
$850,000–$900,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$875,000 per year.
Maximum Award: We will not make
an award exceeding $900,000 for a
single budget period of 12 months.
Estimated Number of Awards: 2.
Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grants:
Estimated Range of Awards:
$950,000–$1,000,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$975,000 per year.
Maximum Award: We will not make
an award exceeding $1,000,000 for a
single budget period of 12 months.
Estimated Number of Awards: 10.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. a. Eligible Applicants: This program
is authorized by title III, part A, of the
HEA. At the time of submission of their
applications, applicants must certify
that an Alaska Native-serving institution
has an enrollment of undergraduate
students that are at least 20 percent
Alaska Native students or that a Native
Hawaiian-serving institution has an
enrollment of undergraduate students
that is at least 10 percent Native
Hawaiian students. An assurance form,
which is included in the application
materials for this competition, must be
signed by an official for the applicant
and submitted with this application.
To qualify as an eligible institution
under the ANNH Program, an
institution also must—
(i) Be accredited or preaccredited by
a nationally recognized accrediting
agency or association that the Secretary
has determined to be a reliable authority
as to the quality of education or training
offered;
(ii) Be legally authorized by the State
in which it is located to be a junior or
community college or to provide an
educational program for which it
awards a bachelor’s degree;
(iii) Demonstrate that it (1) has an
enrollment of needy students as
described in 34 CFR 607.3; and (2) has
low average education and general
expenditures per full-time equivalent
(FTE) undergraduate student as
described in 34 CFR 607.4.
Note: The notice announcing the FY 2023
process for designation of eligible
institutions, and inviting applications for
waiver of eligibility requirements, was
published in the Federal Register on January
17, 2023 (88 FR 2611). Only institutions that
the Department determines are eligible, or
which are granted a waiver under the process
described in that notice, may apply for a
grant in this program.
b. Relationship between the Title III,
Part A Programs and the Developing
Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI)
Program: A grantee under the HSI
Program, which is authorized under title
V of the HEA, may not receive a grant
under any HEA, title III, part A program.
20 U.S.C. 1101d. The title III, part A
programs are the Strengthening
Institutions Program, the ANNH
program, the Tribally Controlled
Colleges and Universities Program, the
Asian American and Native American
Pacific Islander-Serving Institutions
Program, the Predominantly Black
Institutions Program, and the Native
American-Serving Nontribal Institutions
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23649
Program. Furthermore, a current title III,
Part A or title V program grantee may
not give up its grant to receive a grant
under SIP, as described in 34 CFR
607.2(g)(1).
An eligible IHE that is not a current
grantee under the above-cited programs
may apply for a FY 2023 grant under all
title III, part A programs for which it is
eligible, as well as receive consideration
for a grant under the HSI program.
However, a successful applicant may
receive only one grant, as described in
34 CFR 607.2(g)(1).
c. Individual Development and
Cooperative Arrangement Grants: An
eligible IHE that submits applications
for an Individual Development Grant
and a Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grant in this competition
may be awarded both in the same fiscal
year. However, we will not award a
second Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grant as the lead
institution to an otherwise eligible IHE
for an award year for which the IHE
already has a Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grant as the lead
institution under the ANNH Program. A
grantee with an Individual Development
Grant or a Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grant may be a partner in
one or more Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grants. The lead
institution in a Cooperative
Arrangement Development Grant must
be an eligible institution. Partners are
not required to be eligible institutions.
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This
program involves supplement-notsupplant funding requirements. Grant
funds must be used so that they
supplement and, to the extent practical,
increase the funds that would otherwise
be available for the activities to be
carried out under the grant and in no
case supplant those funds (34 CFR
607.30(b)).
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this
competition may not award subgrants to
entities to directly carry out project
activities described in its application.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Application Submission
Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for
Applicants to Department of Education
Discretionary Grant Programs,
published in the Federal Register on
December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045), and
available at www.federalregister.gov/d/
2022-26554, which contain
requirements and information on how to
submit an application. Please note that
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
23650
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
these Common Instructions supersede
the version published on December 27,
2021.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
program.
3. Funding Restrictions: We specify
unallowable costs in 34 CFR 607.10(c).
We reference additional regulations
outlining funding restrictions in the
Applicable Regulations section of this
notice.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The
application narrative is where you, the
applicant, address the selection criteria
that reviewers use to evaluate your
application. We recommend that you (1)
limit the application narrative to no
more than 55 pages for Individual
Development Grants and to no more
than 75 pages for Cooperative
Arrangement Development Grants and
(2) use the following standards below. If
you are addressing one or more
priorities, we recommend that you limit
your response to no more than an
additional 15 pages total, 5 additional
pages for Competitive Preference
Priority 1, 5 additional pages for
Competitive Preference Priority 2 and 5
additional pages for the Invitational
Priority. Please include a separate
heading when responding to one or
more competitive or invitational
priorities.
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double-space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger and no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not
apply to the cover sheet; the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract
and the bibliography. However, the
recommended page limit does apply to
all of the application narrative.
Note: The Budget Information NonConstruction Programs form (ED 524)
sections A–C are not the same as the
narrative response to the Budget section of
the selection criteria.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The following
selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 607.22(a) through (g)
and 34 CFR 75.210. Applicants should
address each of the following selection
criteria separately for each proposed
activity. The selection criteria are worth
a total of 100 points. The maximum
score for each criterion is noted in
parentheses. An applicant that also
chooses to address the competitive
preference priorities can earn up to 110
total points.
(a) Quality of the applicant’s
comprehensive development plan. (Up
to 20 points)
The extent to which—
(1) The strengths, weaknesses, and
significant problems of the institution’s
academic programs, institutional
management, and fiscal stability are
clearly and comprehensively analyzed
and result from a process that involved
major constituencies of the institution.
(5 points)
(2) The goals for the institution’s
academic programs, institutional
management, and fiscal stability are
realistic and based on comprehensive
analysis. (5 points)
(3) The objectives stated in the plan
are measurable, related to institutional
goals, and, if achieved, will contribute
to the growth and self-sufficiency of the
institution. (5 points)
(4) The plan clearly and
comprehensively describes the methods
and resources the institution will use to
institutionalize practice and
improvements developed under the
proposed project, including, in
particular, how operational costs for
personnel, maintenance, and upgrades
of equipment will be paid with
institutional resources. (5 points)
(b) Quality of activity objectives. (Up
to 15 points)
The extent to which the objectives for
each activity are—
(1) Realistic and defined in terms of
measurable results. (8 points)
(2) Directly related to the problems to
be solved and to the goals of the
comprehensive development plan. (7
points)
(c) Quality of the project design. (Up
to 12 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of
the design of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the design of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factor:
(1) The extent to which the proposed
project demonstrates a rationale.
(d) Quality of implementation
strategy. (Up to 16 points)
The extent to which—
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(1) The implementation strategy for
each activity is comprehensive. (6
points)
(2) The rationale for the
implementation strategy for each
activity is clearly described and is
supported by the results of relevant
studies or projects. (6 points)
(3) The timetable for each activity is
realistic and likely to be attained. (4
points)
(e) Quality of key personnel. (Up to 8
points)
The extent to which—
(1) The past experience and training
of key professional personnel are
directly related to the stated activity
objectives. (4 points)
(2) The time commitment of key
personnel is realistic. (4 points)
(f) Quality of project management
plan. (Up to 10 points)
The extent to which—
(1) Procedures for managing the
project are likely to ensure efficient and
effective project implementation. (5
points)
(2) The project coordinator and
activity directors have sufficient
authority to conduct the project
effectively, including access to the
president or chief executive officer. (5
points)
(g) Quality of evaluation plan. (Up to
12 points)
The extent to which—
(1) The data elements and the data
collection procedures are clearly
described and appropriate to measure
the attainment of activity objectives and
to measure the success of the project in
achieving the goals of the
comprehensive development plan. (6
points)
(2) The data analysis procedures are
clearly described and are likely to
produce formative and summative
results on attaining activity objectives
and measuring the success of the project
on achieving the goals of the
comprehensive development plan. (6
points)
(h) Budget. (Up to 7 points)
The extent to which the proposed
costs are necessary and reasonable in
relation to the project’s objectives and
scope.
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary requires
various assurances, including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
A panel of three non-Federal
reviewers will review and score each
application in accordance with the
selection criteria and the competitive
preference priorities. A rank order
funding slate will be made from this
review. Awards will be made in rank
order according to the average score
received from the peer review.
In tie-breaking situations for
development grants, 34 CFR 607.23(b)
requires that we award additional points
in the following three areas. For
purposes of this program, we award one
additional point to an application from
an IHE that has an endowment fund of
which the current market value, per
full-time equivalent enrolled student, is
less than the average current market
value of the endowment funds, per FTE
enrolled student, at comparable type
institutions that offer similar
instruction. We award one additional
point to an application from an IHE that
has expenditures for library materials
per FTE enrolled student that are less
than the average expenditure for library
materials per FTE enrolled student at
similar type institutions. We also add
one additional point to an application
from an IHE that proposes to carry out
one or more of the following activities—
(1) Faculty development;
(2) Funds and administrative
management;
(3) Development and improvement of
academic programs;
(4) Acquisition of equipment for use
in strengthening management and
academic programs;
(5) Joint use of facilities; and
(6) Student services.
For the purpose of these funding
considerations, we use 2020–2021 data.
If a tie remains after applying the tiebreaker mechanism above, priority will
be given to applicants that have the
lowest endowment values per FTE
enrolled student.
3. Risk Assessment and Specific
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.206, before awarding grants under
this program the Department conducts a
review of the risks posed by applicants.
Under 2 CFR 200.208, the Secretary may
impose specific conditions and, under 2
CFR 3474.10, in appropriate
circumstances, high-risk conditions on a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
grant if the applicant or grantee is not
financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a
financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2
CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System:
If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that
over the course of the project period
may exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold (currently $250,000), under 2
CFR 200.206(a)(2), we must make a
judgment about your integrity, business
ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards—that is, the risk posed
by you as an applicant—before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider
any information about you that is in the
integrity and performance system
(currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through the System for
Award Management. You may review
and comment on any information about
yourself that a Federal agency
previously entered and that is currently
in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of
your currently active grants, cooperative
agreements, and procurement contracts
from the Federal Government exceeds
$10,000,000, the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII,
require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually.
Please review the requirements in 2 CFR
part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant
plus all the other Federal funds you
receive exceed $10,000,000.
5. In General: In accordance with the
Office of Management and Budget’s
guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all
applicable Federal laws, and relevant
Executive guidance, the Department
will review and consider applications
for funding pursuant to this notice
inviting applications in accordance
with:
(a) Selecting recipients most likely to
be successful in delivering results based
on the program objectives through an
objective process of evaluating Federal
award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
(b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain
telecommunication and video
surveillance services or equipment in
alignment with section 889 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of
2019 (Pub. L. 115–232) (2 CFR 200.216);
(c) Providing a preference, to the
extent permitted by law, to maximize
use of goods, products, and materials
produced in the United States (2 CFR
200.322); and
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23651
(d) Terminating agreements in whole
or in part to the greatest extent
authorized by law if an award no longer
effectuates the program goals or agency
priorities (2 CFR 200.340).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements:
Unless an exception applies, if you are
awarded a grant under this competition,
you will be required to openly license
to the public grant deliverables created
in whole, or in part, with Department
grant funds. When the deliverable
consists of modifications to pre-existing
works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately
identified and only to the extent that
open licensing is permitted under the
terms of any licenses or other legal
restrictions on the use of pre-existing
works. Additionally, a grantee or
subgrantee that is awarded competitive
grant funds must have a plan to
disseminate these public grant
deliverables. This dissemination plan
can be developed and submitted after
your application has been reviewed and
selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing
requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
23652
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: The
Secretary has established the following
key performance measures for the
purpose of Department reporting under
34 CFR 75.110.
(a) The percentage change, over the 5year period, of the number of full-time
degree-seeking undergraduates enrolled
at Alaska Native and Native HawaiianServing Institutions (Note: This is a
long-term measure, which will be used
to periodically gauge performance);
(b) The percentage of first-time, fulltime degree-seeking undergraduate
students at 4-year Alaska Native and
Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions
who were in their first year of
postsecondary enrollment in the
previous year and are enrolled in the
current year at the same Alaska Native
and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institution;
(c) The percentage of first-time, fulltime degree-seeking undergraduate
students at 2-year Alaska Native and
Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions
who were in their first year of
postsecondary enrollment in the
previous year and are enrolled in the
current year at the same Alaska Native
and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institution;
(d) The percentage of first-time, fulltime degree-seeking undergraduate
students enrolled at 4-year Alaska
Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institutions who graduate within 6 years
of enrollment; and
(e) The percentage of first-time, fulltime degree-seeking undergraduate
students enrolled at 2-year Alaska
Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institutions who graduate within 3 years
of enrollment.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
requirements, whether the grantee has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
made substantial progress in achieving
the performance targets in the grantee’s
approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document and a copy of the
application package in an accessible
format. The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
feature at this site, you can limit your
search to documents published by the
Department.
Nasser H. Paydar,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
[FR Doc. 2023–08094 Filed 4–17–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice Inviting Postsecondary
Educational Institutions To Participate
in Experiments Under the Experimental
Sites Initiative; Federal Student
Financial Assistance Programs Under
Title IV of the Higher Education Act of
1965, as Amended
Federal Student Aid,
Department of Education.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice.
The Secretary invites
postsecondary educational institutions
(institutions) that currently participate
in the Second Chance Pell experiment
to apply to participate in a revised
Second Chance Pell institution-based
experiment under the Experimental
Sites Initiative (ESI).
DATES: Letters of application to
participate in the revised experiment
described in this notice must be
received by the Department of
Education (the Department) no later
than May 18, 2023. Letters of interest
received after May 18, 2023 may still, at
the discretion of the Secretary, be
considered for participation.
ADDRESSES: Letters of interest must be
submitted by electronic mail to the
following email address:
experimentalsites@ed.gov. For formats
and other required information, see
‘‘Instructions for Submitting Letters of
Interest’’ under the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolyn Rose, U.S. Department of
Education, Federal Student Aid, 400
Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20202. Telephone: (202) 803–1502.
Email: Carolyn.Rose@ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability and wish to
access telecommunications relay
services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Instructions for Submitting Letters of
Interest: Letters of interest should take
the form of an Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) attachment to
an email message sent to the email
address provided in the ADDRESSES
section of this notice. The subject line
of the email should read ‘‘ESI 2023—
Pell for Students Who Are
Incarcerated.’’ The text of the email
should include the name and address of
the institution. The letter of interest
should be on institutional letterhead
and be signed by the institution’s
financial aid administrator. The letter of
interest must include the institution’s
official name and the Department’s
Office of Postsecondary Education
Identification (OPEID) number, the
name of a contact person at the
institution, including a mailing address,
email address, and telephone number,
as well as the name and address of the
correctional facility(ies) with which the
institution partners. Please include in
the letter a listing of the academic
programs that the institution is offering
under the current experiment and that
the institution expects to include in the
revised experiment. For each of those
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23647-23652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08094]
[[Page 23647]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-
Serving Institutions Program, Part A
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2023 for the
Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions (ANNH) Program,
Part A, Assistance Listing Numbers 84.031N (Alaska Native) and 84.031W
(Native Hawaiian). This notice relates to the approved information
collection under OMB control number 1840-0810.
DATES:
Applications Available: April 18, 2023.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 20, 2023.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 16, 2023.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045) and available at
www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-26554. Please note that these Common
Instructions supersede the version published on December 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robyn Wood, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 2B203, Washington, DC 20202-
4260. Telephone: (202) 987-1577. Email: ed.gov">[email protected]ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The ANNH Program provides grants to eligible
institutions of higher education (IHEs) to enable them to improve and
expand their capacity to serve Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian
students. Institutions may use these grants to plan, develop, or
implement activities that strengthen the institution.
Background:
Students' sense of belonging impacts postsecondary retention.\1\
Creating that sense of belonging begins with ensuring the institution's
ability to serve students well. Research shows that institutional
belonging predicts better persistence, engagement, and mental health
for enrolled students.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Davis, G.M., Hanzsek-Brill, M.B., Petzold, M.C., and
Robinson, D.H., ``Students' Sense of Belonging: The Development of a
Predictive Retention Model.'' Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching
and Learning, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 117-27 (Feb. 2019).
\2\ Gopalan, M., & Brady, S.T. (2020). College Students' Sense
of Belonging: A National Perspective. Educational Researcher, 49(2),
134-137. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0013189X19897622.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mental health concerns for college students have increased due to a
growing number of student exposures to trauma and disruptions in
learning and disengagement from school and peers.\3\ Studies indicate
that the mental health of Alaska Native students has seen the largest
decline since 2016, and both Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian students
reported significant increases in mental health issues during the
COVID-19 pandemic.\4\ Implementing or expanding institutional capacity
to provide mental health and other services that help support students'
social, emotional, and academic needs also supports student retention.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/10/mental-health-campus-care.
\4\ https://www.bu.edu/articles/2022/mental-health-of-college-students-is-getting-worse/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through this grant program, the Department encourages Alaska Native
and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions to develop, create, or enhance
programs that foster students' sense of belonging and to implement
services that will help students complete their degree programs.
Through the competitive preference priorities for this grant
competition, the Department invites applicants to submit proposals to
provide high-quality learning, improve student engagement, and meet the
needs of Native students.
Priorities: This notice contains two competitive preference
priorities and one invitational priority. The competitive preference
priorities are from the Secretary's Supplemental Priorities and
Definitions for Discretionary Grants Programs, published in the Federal
Register on December 10, 2021 (86 FR 70612) (Supplemental Priorities).
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2023 and any subsequent year
in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition, these priorities are competitive preference priorities.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 5 points to
an application for each priority, depending on how well the application
meets the priorities. Applicants may respond to one or both priorities,
for a total of up to 10 additional points.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1: Meeting Student Social,
Emotional, and Academic Needs (up to 5 points).
Projects that are designed to improve students' social, emotional,
academic, and career development, with a focus on underserved students
(as defined in this notice), by creating a positive, inclusive, and
identity-safe climate at IHEs through one or more of the following
activities:
(a) Fostering a sense of belonging and inclusion for underserved
students.
(b) Implementing evidence-based practices for advancing student
success for underserved students.
Competitive Preference Priority 2: Increasing Postsecondary
Education Access, Affordability, Completion, and Post-Enrollment
Success (up to 5 points).
Projects that are designed to increase postsecondary access,
affordability, completion, and success for underserved students by
addressing one or more of the following priority areas:
(a) Increasing the number and proportion of underserved students
who enroll in and complete postsecondary education programs, which may
include strategies related to college preparation, awareness,
application, selection, advising, counseling, and enrollment.
(b) Supporting the development and implementation of student
success programs that integrate multiple comprehensive and evidence-
based services or initiatives, such as academic advising, structured/
guided pathways, career services, credit-bearing academic undergraduate
courses focused on career, and programs to meet basic needs, such as
housing, childcare, transportation, student financial aid, and access
to technological devices.
Note: Under 34 CFR 607.10(c)(13), grantees may not use funds
awarded under this program to pay directly for childcare and
transportation expenses.
(c) Supporting the development and implementation of high-quality
and accessible learning opportunities, including learning opportunities
that are accelerated or hybrid online; credit-bearing; work-based; and
flexible for working students.
(d) Providing secondary school students with access to career
exploration and advising opportunities to help students make informed
decisions about their postsecondary enrollment decisions and to place
them on a career path.
Invitational Priority: For FY 2023 and any subsequent year in which
we make
[[Page 23648]]
awards from the list of unfunded applications from this competition,
this priority is an invitational priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1),
we do not give an application that meets this invitational priority a
competitive or absolute preference over other applicants.
This priority is:
Projects that support activities to strengthen and institutionalize
Native language preservation and revitalization.
Note: Applicants must include in the one-page abstract submitted
with the application a statement indicating whether they are
addressing competitive preference priority 1, competitive preference
priority 2, the invitational priority, any combination of these
priorities, or all of these priorities. If the applicant has
addressed the priorities, this information also must be listed on
the ANNH Program Profile form in the application booklet.
Definitions: The definitions below apply to this competition and
are from 20 U.S.C. 1059d, 20 U.S.C. 7517, 20 U.S.C. 7546, 43 U.S.C.
1602, 34 CFR 77.1, and the Supplemental Priorities.
Alaska Native has the meaning given the term in section 6306 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.
Alaska Native-serving institution means an institution of higher
education that--
(A) is an eligible institution under section 1058(b) of title 20;
and
(B) at the time of application, has an enrollment of undergraduate
students that is at least 20 percent Alaska Native students.
Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve
relevant outcomes.
Fiscal Year means the Federal fiscal year--a period beginning on
October 1 and ending on the following September 30.
Grantee means the legal entity to which a grant is awarded and that
is accountable to the Federal Government for the use of the funds
provided. The grantee is the entire legal entity even if only a
particular component of the entity is designated in the grant award
notice (GAN). For example, a GAN may name as the grantee one school or
campus of a university. In this case, the granting agency usually
intends, or actually intends, that the named component assume primary
or sole responsibility for administering the grant-assisted project or
program. Nevertheless, the naming of a component of a legal entity as
the grantee in a grant award document shall not be construed as
relieving the whole legal entity from accountability to the Federal
Government for the use of the funds provided. (This definition is not
intended to affect the eligibility provision of grant programs in which
eligibility is limited to organizations that may be only components of
a legal entity.) The term ``grantee'' does not include any secondary
recipients, such as subgrantees and contractors, that may receive funds
from a grantee pursuant to a subgrant or contract.
Logic model (also referred to as theory of action) means a
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project
components and relevant outcomes.
Note: In developing logic models, applicants may want to use
resources such as the Regional Educational Laboratory Program's (REL
Pacific) Education Logic Model Application User Guide, available at
the ELM Application (ed.gov). Other sources include: Logic models: A
tool for effective program planning, collaboration, and monitoring
(ed.gov), Logic models: A tool for designing and monitoring program
evaluations (ed.gov), and Logic models for program design,
implementation, and evaluation: Workshop toolkit (ed.gov).
Native means a citizen of the United States who is a person of one-
fourth degree or more Alaska Indian (including Tsimshian Indians not
enrolled in the Metlaktla Indian Community) Eskimo, or Aleut blood, or
combination thereof. The term includes any Native as so defined either
or both of whose adoptive parents are not Natives. It also includes, in
the absence of proof of a minimum blood quantum, any citizen of the
United States who is regarded as an Alaska Native by the Native village
or Native group of which he claims to be a member and whose father or
mother is (or, if deceased, was) regarded as Native by any village or
group. Any decision of the Secretary regarding eligibility for
enrollment shall be final.
Native Hawaiian means any individual who is--
(A) a citizen of the United States; and
(B) a descendant of the aboriginal people who, prior to 1778,
occupied and exercised sovereignty in the area that now comprises the
State of Hawaii, as evidenced by--
(i) genealogical records;
(ii) Kupuna (elders) or Kamaaina (long-term community residents)
verification; or
(iii) certified birth records.
Native Hawaiian-serving institution means an institution of higher
education which--
(A) is an eligible institution under section 1058(b) of title 20;
and
(B) at the time of application, has an enrollment of undergraduate
students that is at least 10 percent Native Hawaiian students.
Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention,
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s)
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the
specific goals of the program.
Underserved student means a student in one or more of the following
subgroups:
(a) A student who is living in poverty or is served by schools with
high concentrations of students living in poverty.
(b) A student of color.
(c) A student who is a member of a federally recognized Indian
Tribe.
(d) An English learner.
(e) A child or student with a disability.
(f) A lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, or
intersex (LGBTQI+) student.
(g) A pregnant, parenting, or caregiving student.
(h) A student impacted by the justice system, including a formerly
incarcerated student.
(i) A student who is the first in their family to attend
postsecondary education.
(j) A student enrolling in or seeking to enroll in postsecondary
education for the first time at the age of 20 or older.
(k) A student who is working full-time while enrolled in
postsecondary education.
(l) A student who is enrolled in or is seeking to enroll in
postsecondary education who is eligible for a Pell Grant.
(m) An adult student in need of improving their basic skills or an
adult student with limited English proficiency.
(n) A military- or veteran-connected student.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1059d.
Note: In 2008, the HEA was amended by the Higher Education
Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA), Public Law 110-315. Please note that
the regulations for ANNH in 34 CFR part 607 have not been updated to
reflect
[[Page 23649]]
these statutory changes. The statute supersedes all other
regulations.
Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in the
Federal civil rights laws.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97,
98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 607. (e)
The Supplemental Priorities.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants. Five-year Individual
Development Grants and Cooperative Arrangement Development Grants will
be awarded in FY 2023.
Note: A cooperative arrangement is an arrangement to carry out
allowable grant activities between an institution eligible to
receive a grant under this part and another eligible or ineligible
IHE, under which the resources of the cooperating institutions are
combined and shared to better achieve the purposes of this part and
avoid costly duplication of effort.
Estimated Available Funds: $11,771,979.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Individual Development Grants:
Estimated Range of Awards: $850,000-$900,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $875,000 per year.
Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $900,000 for a
single budget period of 12 months.
Estimated Number of Awards: 2.
Cooperative Arrangement Development Grants:
Estimated Range of Awards: $950,000-$1,000,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $975,000 per year.
Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $1,000,000 for a
single budget period of 12 months.
Estimated Number of Awards: 10.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. a. Eligible Applicants: This program is authorized by title III,
part A, of the HEA. At the time of submission of their applications,
applicants must certify that an Alaska Native-serving institution has
an enrollment of undergraduate students that are at least 20 percent
Alaska Native students or that a Native Hawaiian-serving institution
has an enrollment of undergraduate students that is at least 10 percent
Native Hawaiian students. An assurance form, which is included in the
application materials for this competition, must be signed by an
official for the applicant and submitted with this application.
To qualify as an eligible institution under the ANNH Program, an
institution also must--
(i) Be accredited or preaccredited by a nationally recognized
accrediting agency or association that the Secretary has determined to
be a reliable authority as to the quality of education or training
offered;
(ii) Be legally authorized by the State in which it is located to
be a junior or community college or to provide an educational program
for which it awards a bachelor's degree;
(iii) Demonstrate that it (1) has an enrollment of needy students
as described in 34 CFR 607.3; and (2) has low average education and
general expenditures per full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduate
student as described in 34 CFR 607.4.
Note: The notice announcing the FY 2023 process for designation
of eligible institutions, and inviting applications for waiver of
eligibility requirements, was published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2023 (88 FR 2611). Only institutions that the Department
determines are eligible, or which are granted a waiver under the
process described in that notice, may apply for a grant in this
program.
b. Relationship between the Title III, Part A Programs and the
Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) Program: A grantee under
the HSI Program, which is authorized under title V of the HEA, may not
receive a grant under any HEA, title III, part A program. 20 U.S.C.
1101d. The title III, part A programs are the Strengthening
Institutions Program, the ANNH program, the Tribally Controlled
Colleges and Universities Program, the Asian American and Native
American Pacific Islander-Serving Institutions Program, the
Predominantly Black Institutions Program, and the Native American-
Serving Nontribal Institutions Program. Furthermore, a current title
III, Part A or title V program grantee may not give up its grant to
receive a grant under SIP, as described in 34 CFR 607.2(g)(1).
An eligible IHE that is not a current grantee under the above-cited
programs may apply for a FY 2023 grant under all title III, part A
programs for which it is eligible, as well as receive consideration for
a grant under the HSI program. However, a successful applicant may
receive only one grant, as described in 34 CFR 607.2(g)(1).
c. Individual Development and Cooperative Arrangement Grants: An
eligible IHE that submits applications for an Individual Development
Grant and a Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant in this
competition may be awarded both in the same fiscal year. However, we
will not award a second Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant as
the lead institution to an otherwise eligible IHE for an award year for
which the IHE already has a Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant
as the lead institution under the ANNH Program. A grantee with an
Individual Development Grant or a Cooperative Arrangement Development
Grant may be a partner in one or more Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grants. The lead institution in a Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grant must be an eligible institution. Partners are not
required to be eligible institutions.
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-not-
supplant funding requirements. Grant funds must be used so that they
supplement and, to the extent practical, increase the funds that would
otherwise be available for the activities to be carried out under the
grant and in no case supplant those funds (34 CFR 607.30(b)).
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities
described in its application.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045), and available at
www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-26554, which contain requirements and
information on how to submit an application. Please note that
[[Page 23650]]
these Common Instructions supersede the version published on December
27, 2021.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this program.
3. Funding Restrictions: We specify unallowable costs in 34 CFR
607.10(c). We reference additional regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you,
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the
application narrative to no more than 55 pages for Individual
Development Grants and to no more than 75 pages for Cooperative
Arrangement Development Grants and (2) use the following standards
below. If you are addressing one or more priorities, we recommend that
you limit your response to no more than an additional 15 pages total, 5
additional pages for Competitive Preference Priority 1, 5 additional
pages for Competitive Preference Priority 2 and 5 additional pages for
the Invitational Priority. Please include a separate heading when
responding to one or more competitive or invitational priorities.
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger and no
smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract and the
bibliography. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of
the application narrative.
Note: The Budget Information Non-Construction Programs form (ED
524) sections A-C are not the same as the narrative response to the
Budget section of the selection criteria.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The following selection criteria for this
competition are from 34 CFR 607.22(a) through (g) and 34 CFR 75.210.
Applicants should address each of the following selection criteria
separately for each proposed activity. The selection criteria are worth
a total of 100 points. The maximum score for each criterion is noted in
parentheses. An applicant that also chooses to address the competitive
preference priorities can earn up to 110 total points.
(a) Quality of the applicant's comprehensive development plan. (Up
to 20 points)
The extent to which--
(1) The strengths, weaknesses, and significant problems of the
institution's academic programs, institutional management, and fiscal
stability are clearly and comprehensively analyzed and result from a
process that involved major constituencies of the institution. (5
points)
(2) The goals for the institution's academic programs,
institutional management, and fiscal stability are realistic and based
on comprehensive analysis. (5 points)
(3) The objectives stated in the plan are measurable, related to
institutional goals, and, if achieved, will contribute to the growth
and self-sufficiency of the institution. (5 points)
(4) The plan clearly and comprehensively describes the methods and
resources the institution will use to institutionalize practice and
improvements developed under the proposed project, including, in
particular, how operational costs for personnel, maintenance, and
upgrades of equipment will be paid with institutional resources. (5
points)
(b) Quality of activity objectives. (Up to 15 points)
The extent to which the objectives for each activity are--
(1) Realistic and defined in terms of measurable results. (8
points)
(2) Directly related to the problems to be solved and to the goals
of the comprehensive development plan. (7 points)
(c) Quality of the project design. (Up to 12 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factor:
(1) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a
rationale.
(d) Quality of implementation strategy. (Up to 16 points)
The extent to which--
(1) The implementation strategy for each activity is comprehensive.
(6 points)
(2) The rationale for the implementation strategy for each activity
is clearly described and is supported by the results of relevant
studies or projects. (6 points)
(3) The timetable for each activity is realistic and likely to be
attained. (4 points)
(e) Quality of key personnel. (Up to 8 points)
The extent to which--
(1) The past experience and training of key professional personnel
are directly related to the stated activity objectives. (4 points)
(2) The time commitment of key personnel is realistic. (4 points)
(f) Quality of project management plan. (Up to 10 points)
The extent to which--
(1) Procedures for managing the project are likely to ensure
efficient and effective project implementation. (5 points)
(2) The project coordinator and activity directors have sufficient
authority to conduct the project effectively, including access to the
president or chief executive officer. (5 points)
(g) Quality of evaluation plan. (Up to 12 points)
The extent to which--
(1) The data elements and the data collection procedures are
clearly described and appropriate to measure the attainment of activity
objectives and to measure the success of the project in achieving the
goals of the comprehensive development plan. (6 points)
(2) The data analysis procedures are clearly described and are
likely to produce formative and summative results on attaining activity
objectives and measuring the success of the project on achieving the
goals of the comprehensive development plan. (6 points)
(h) Budget. (Up to 7 points)
The extent to which the proposed costs are necessary and reasonable
in relation to the project's objectives and scope.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to
[[Page 23651]]
submit a timely performance report or submitted a report of
unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
A panel of three non-Federal reviewers will review and score each
application in accordance with the selection criteria and the
competitive preference priorities. A rank order funding slate will be
made from this review. Awards will be made in rank order according to
the average score received from the peer review.
In tie-breaking situations for development grants, 34 CFR 607.23(b)
requires that we award additional points in the following three areas.
For purposes of this program, we award one additional point to an
application from an IHE that has an endowment fund of which the current
market value, per full-time equivalent enrolled student, is less than
the average current market value of the endowment funds, per FTE
enrolled student, at comparable type institutions that offer similar
instruction. We award one additional point to an application from an
IHE that has expenditures for library materials per FTE enrolled
student that are less than the average expenditure for library
materials per FTE enrolled student at similar type institutions. We
also add one additional point to an application from an IHE that
proposes to carry out one or more of the following activities--
(1) Faculty development;
(2) Funds and administrative management;
(3) Development and improvement of academic programs;
(4) Acquisition of equipment for use in strengthening management
and academic programs;
(5) Joint use of facilities; and
(6) Student services.
For the purpose of these funding considerations, we use 2020-2021
data.
If a tie remains after applying the tie-breaker mechanism above,
priority will be given to applicants that have the lowest endowment
values per FTE enrolled student.
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.206, before awarding grants under this program the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR
3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant
if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2), we must make a judgment about
your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before
we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about
you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred
to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and
Budget's guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting
applications in accordance with:
(a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
(b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR
200.216);
(c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
(d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information,
[[Page 23652]]
as directed by the Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you
must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the
Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: The Secretary has established the
following key performance measures for the purpose of Department
reporting under 34 CFR 75.110.
(a) The percentage change, over the 5-year period, of the number of
full-time degree-seeking undergraduates enrolled at Alaska Native and
Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions (Note: This is a long-term
measure, which will be used to periodically gauge performance);
(b) The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking
undergraduate students at 4-year Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-
Serving Institutions who were in their first year of postsecondary
enrollment in the previous year and are enrolled in the current year at
the same Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institution;
(c) The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking
undergraduate students at 2-year Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-
Serving Institutions who were in their first year of postsecondary
enrollment in the previous year and are enrolled in the current year at
the same Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institution;
(d) The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking
undergraduate students enrolled at 4-year Alaska Native and Native
Hawaiian-Serving Institutions who graduate within 6 years of
enrollment; and
(e) The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking
undergraduate students enrolled at 2-year Alaska Native and Native
Hawaiian-Serving Institutions who graduate within 3 years of
enrollment.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, whether
the grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the performance
targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced feature at
this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the
Department.
Nasser H. Paydar,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2023-08094 Filed 4-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P