Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under the Data Privacy Framework Program, 19062-19065 [2023-06647]
Download as PDF
19062
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 2023 / Notices
Commerce in the form of a participation
fee is required. The participation fee for
the Transportation and Logistics Trade
Mission to Saudi Arabia will be $2,600
for small or medium-sized enterprises
(SME) and $3,500 for large firms or
trade associations.1 The fee for each
additional firm representative (large
firm or SME/trade organization) is
$1,000 for both stops. Expenses for
travel, lodging, meals, and incidentals
will be the responsibility of each
mission participant. Interpreter and
driver services can be arranged for
additional cost. Delegation members
will be able to take advantage of U.S.
Embassy rates for hotel rooms. If an
applicant is selected to participate on a
particular mission, a payment to the
Department of Commerce in the amount
of the designated participation fee is
required. Upon notification of
acceptance to participate, those selected
have 5 business days to submit payment
or the acceptance may be revoked.
Participants selected for a trade
mission will be expected to pay for the
cost of personal expenses, including,
but not limited to, international travel,
lodging, meals, transportation,
communication, and incidentals, unless
otherwise noted. Participants will,
however, be able to take advantage of
U.S. Government rates for hotel rooms.
In the event that a mission is cancelled,
no personal expenses paid in
anticipation of a mission will be
reimbursed. However, participation fees
for a cancelled mission will be
reimbursed to the extent they have not
already been expended in anticipation
of the mission.
Trade mission members participate in
trade missions and undertake missionrelated travel at their own risk. The
nature of the security situation in a
given foreign market at a given time
cannot be guaranteed. The U.S.
Government does not make any
representations or guarantees as to the
safety or security of participants. The
U.S. Department of State issues U.S.
Government international travel alerts
and warnings for U.S. citizens available
at https://travel.state.gov/content/
passports/en/alertswarnings.html. Any
question regarding insurance coverage
must be resolved by the participant and
its insurer of choice.
Timeframe for Recruitment and
Applications
Mission recruitment will be
conducted in an open and public
manner, including publication in the
Federal Register, posting on the
Department of Commerce trade mission
calendar (https://www.trade.gov/trademissions-schedule) and other internet
websites, press releases to general and
trade media, direct mail, notices by
industry trade associations and other
multiplier groups, and publicity at
industry meetings, symposia,
conferences, and trade shows.
Recruitment for the mission will
conclude on August 30, 2023. The
Department of Commerce will review
applications on a rolling basis and
inform applicants of selection decisions
on a comparative basis. Applications
received after August 30, 2023, will be
considered only if space and scheduling
constraints permit.
Contacts
Juanita Harthun (Recruitment Lead)
Automotive & Smart Mobility Team
Leader, +1 704–564–3592,
Juanita.Harthun@trade.gov
Shirreff Loza (Project Lead) Director,
Raleigh, NC Office, +1 919–695–6365,
Shirreff.Loza@trade.gov
U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service—
Riyadh Team
Saad Ahmed, Commercial Specialist,
+966–50–568–1768, Saad.Ahmed@
trade.gov
Kerry LePain, Commercial Officer,
+966–53–852–9761, Kerry.LePain@
trade.gov
Carla Mene´ndez McManus (Project
Manager), Deputy Senior Commercial
Officer, +966–55–050–3497,
Carla.Menendez@trade.gov
U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service—
Jeddah Team
Anwar Shaqhan, Senior Commercial
Specialist, +966–50–554–6110,
Anwar.Shaqhan@trade.gov
Gemal Brangman,
Director, ITA Events Management Task Force.
[FR Doc. 2023–06616 Filed 3–29–23; 8:45 am]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
1 For
purposes of assessing participation fees, an
applicant is a small or medium-sized enterprise
(SME) if it qualifies under the Small Business
Administration’s (SBA) size standards (https://
www.sba.gov/document/support--table-sizestandards), which vary by North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) Code. The SBA Size
Standards Tool [https://www.sba.gov/sizestandards/] can help you determine the
qualifications that apply to your company.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Mar 29, 2023
Jkt 259001
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Applications for Inclusion on
the Lists of Arbitrators Under the Data
Privacy Framework Program
International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of information collection,
request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to comment on
proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. The purpose of this
notice is to allow for 60 days of public
comment preceding submission of the
collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration,
comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received
on or before May 30, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments to
Leo Kim, ITA Paperwork Clearance
Officer, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, Room 23016RA, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the internet at
PRAcomment@doc.gov). Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
specific questions related to collection
activities should be directed to David
Ritchie, Senior Policy Advisor,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce via email at
dpf.program@trade.gov, or by telephone
at 202–482–1512.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The United States, the European
Union (EU), the United Kingdom (UK),
and Switzerland share a commitment to
enhancing privacy protection, the rule
of law, and a recognition of the
importance of transatlantic data flows to
our respective citizens, economies, and
societies, but take different approaches
to doing so. Given those differences, the
Department of Commerce (DOC)
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 2023 / Notices
developed the EU-U.S. Data Privacy
Framework (EU-U.S. DPF), the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy
Framework (UK Extension to the EUU.S. DPF), and the Swiss-U.S. Data
Privacy Framework (Swiss-U.S. DPF) in
consultation with the European
Commission, the UK Government, the
Swiss Federal Administration, industry,
and other stakeholders. These
arrangements were respectively
developed to provide U.S. organizations
reliable mechanisms for personal data
transfers to the United States from the
European Union, the United Kingdom,
and Switzerland while ensuring data
protection that is consistent with EU,
UK, and Swiss law.
The DOC is issuing the EU-U.S. DPF
Principles and the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles, including the respective sets
of Supplemental Principles (collectively
the Principles) and Annex I of the
Principles, as well as the UK Extension
to the EU-U.S. DPF under its statutory
authority to foster, promote, and
develop international commerce (15
U.S.C. 1512). The International Trade
Administration (ITA) will administer
and supervise the Data Privacy
Framework program, including
maintaining and making publicly
available the Data Privacy Framework
List, an authoritative list of U.S.
organizations that have self-certified to
the DOC and declared their commitment
to adhere to the Principles pursuant to
the EU-U.S. DPF and, as applicable, the
UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and/
or the Swiss-U.S. DPF. While the
decision by an organization to selfcertify its compliance pursuant to the
EU-U.S. DPF and, as applicable the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and/or
the Swiss-U.S. DPF and by extension
participate in the Data Privacy
Framework program is voluntary;
effective compliance is compulsory:
organizations that self-certify to the
DOC and publicly declare their
commitment to adhere to the Principles
must comply fully with the Principles.
Such commitments to comply with the
Principles are legally enforceable under
U.S. law. On the basis of the Principles,
Executive Order 14086, 28 CFR part
201, and accompanying letters and
materials, including ITA’s commitments
regarding the administration and
supervision of the Data Privacy
Framework program, it is the DOC’s
expectation that the European
Commission, the UK Government, and
the Swiss Federal Administration will
respectively recognize the adequacy of
the protection provided by the EU-U.S.
DPF, the UK Extension to the EU-U.S.
DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF thereby
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Mar 29, 2023
Jkt 259001
enabling personal data transfers from
each respective jurisdiction to U.S.
organizations participating in the
relevant part of the Data Privacy
Framework program. The EU-U.S. DPF,
the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF,
and the Swiss-U.S. DPF will not enter
into effect until they have respectively
received such recognition (i.e., until
such formal recognition enters into
effect).
As respectively described in Annex I
of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles, the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and
Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles the DOC commits separately
with the European Commission, the UK
Government, and the Swiss Federal
Administration to implement an
arbitration mechanism to provide EU,
UK, and Swiss individuals with the
ability under certain circumstances to
invoke binding arbitration to determine,
for residual claims, whether an
organization has violated its obligations
under the Principles as to those
individuals. Organizations that selfcertify their compliance pursuant to the
EU-U.S. DPF, including those that also
elect to participate in the UK Extension
to the EU-U.S. DPF are obligated to
arbitrate claims and follow the terms as
set forth in Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF
Principles, provided that an EU or UK
(as applicable) individual has invoked
binding arbitration by delivering notice
to the organization at issue and
following the procedures and subject to
the conditions set forth in Annex I of
the EU-U.S. DPF Principles.
Organizations that self-certify their
compliance pursuant to the Swiss-U.S.
DPF are obligated to arbitrate claims and
follow the terms as set forth in Annex
I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles,
provided that a Swiss individual has
invoked binding arbitration by
delivering notice to the organization at
issue and following the procedures and
subject to the conditions set forth in
Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles. An individual’s decision to
invoke this binding arbitration option is
entirely voluntary. Arbitral decisions
will be binding on all parties to the
arbitration. Under this binding
arbitration option, a panel (consisting of
one or three arbitrators, as agreed by the
parties) has the authority to impose
individual-specific, non-monetary
equitable relief (such as access,
correction, deletion, or return of the
individual’s data in question) necessary
to remedy the violation of the Principles
only with respect to the individual. No
damages, costs, fees, or other remedies
are available. The parties will select the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19063
arbitrators from the list(s) of arbitrators
described below.
Pursuant to the EU-U.S. DPF and the
UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, the
DOC and the European Commission will
develop and seek to maintain a list of
at least 10 arbitrators. The parties,
including the EU or UK individual who
has invoked binding arbitration, will
select arbitrators for the arbitration
panel from that list of arbitrators
developed under the EU-U.S. DPF (EUU.S. DPF List of Arbitrators). To be
eligible for inclusion on the EU-U.S.
DPF List of Arbitrators, applicants must
be admitted to practice law in the
United States and be experts in U.S.
privacy law, with expertise in EU data
protection law; and shall not be subject
to any instructions from, or be affiliated
with, either party, or any participating
organization, or the United States,
European Union, or any EU Member
State or any other governmental
authority, public authority, or
enforcement authority. Arbitrators will
remain on the EU-U.S. DPF List of
Arbitrators for a period of 3 years,
absent exceptional circumstances or
removal for cause, renewable by the
DOC, with prior notification to the
European Commission for additional 3year terms.
Pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF the
DOC and the Swiss Federal
Administration will develop and seek to
maintain a list of up to five arbitrators
to supplement the list of arbitrators
developed under the EU-U.S. DPF. The
parties, including the Swiss individual
who has invoked binding arbitration,
will select arbitrators for the arbitration
panel from the list of arbitrators
developed under the EU-U.S. DPF, as
supplemented by the list of arbitrators
developed under the Swiss-U.S. DPF
(Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators). To be eligible for inclusion
on the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental
List of Arbitrators, applicants must be
admitted to practice law in the United
States and be experts in U.S. privacy
law, with expertise in European or
Swiss data protection law; and shall not
be subject to any instructions from, or
be affiliated with, either party, or any
participating organization, or the United
States, Switzerland, European Union, or
any EU Member State or any other
governmental authority, public
authority, or enforcement authority.
Arbitrators will remain on the SwissU.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators for a period of 3 years,
absent exceptional circumstances or
removal for cause, renewable by the
DOC, with prior notification to the
Swiss Federal Administration for
additional 3-year terms.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
19064
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 2023 / Notices
To be considered for inclusion on the
EU-U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators or the
Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators, eligible individuals will be
respectively evaluated by the DOC and
the European Commission and the DOC
and the Swiss Federal Administration
on the basis of independence, integrity,
and expertise:
Independence:
—Freedom from bias and prejudice.
Integrity:
—Held in the highest regard by peers for
integrity, fairness, and good judgment.
—Demonstrates high ethical standards
and commitment necessary to be an
arbitrator.
Expertise:
—Required expertise:
—Admission to practice law in the
United States.
—Level of demonstrated expertise in
U.S. privacy law and EU and/or
Swiss data protection law (as
applicable).
—Other expertise that may be
considered includes any of the
following:
—Relevant educational degrees and
professional licenses.
—Relevant professional or academic
experience or legal practice.
—Relevant training or experience in
arbitration or other forms of dispute
resolution.
The DOC has agreed with the
European Commission to the adoption
of arbitration rules that govern
arbitration proceedings and a code of
conduct for arbitrators under the EUU.S. DPF (and similarly agreed with the
UK Government as relates to arbitration
proceedings under the UK Extension to
the EU-U.S. DPF), and the Swiss Federal
Administration to the adoption of
arbitration rules that govern arbitration
proceedings and a code of conduct for
arbitrators under the Swiss-U.S. DPF. In
the event that the rules governing the
proceedings and/or the code of conduct
for arbitrators need to be changed, the
DOC and the European Commission and
the Swiss Federal Administration will
agree to amend those rules or adopt a
different set of existing, well-established
U.S. arbitral procedures, and/or amend
the code of conduct for arbitrators (as
applicable).
The DOC has selected the
International Centre for Dispute
Resolution (ICDR), the international
division of the American Arbitration
Association (AAA) (collectively ICDRAAA) to administer arbitrations
pursuant to and manage the arbitral
fund identified in Annex I of the EUU.S. DPF Principles, including as relates
to the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Mar 29, 2023
Jkt 259001
and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles. Among other things, the
ICDR–AAA facilitates arbitrator fee
arrangements, including the collection
and timely payment of arbitrator fees
and other expenses. On September 15,
2017, the DOC and the European
Commission agreed to the adoption of a
set of arbitration rules to govern binding
arbitration proceedings described in
Annex I of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework Principles, as well as a code
of conduct for arbitrators that is
consistent with generally accepted
ethical standards for commercial
arbitrators and Annex I of the
Principles. On March 29, 2018, the DOC
and the Swiss Federal Administration
agreed to the adoption of a set of
arbitration rules to govern binding
arbitration proceedings described in
Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework Principles, as well as
a code of conduct for arbitrators that is
consistent with generally accepted
ethical standards for commercial
arbitrators and Annex I of the
Principles. The DOC has respectively
agreed with the European Commission
(and the UK Government, as
appropriate, with regard to the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF) and the
Swiss Federal Administration to adapt
those sets of arbitration rules and codes
of conduct to reflect the updates under
the EU-U.S. DPF (including as
applicable to the UK Extension to the
EU-U.S. DPF) and the Swiss-U.S. DPF,
and the DOC will work with the ICDR–
AAA to make those updates.
Applications:
Applications must be typewritten,
electronically submitted, and headed
‘‘Application for Inclusion on the EUU.S. DPF List of Arbitrators’’ or
‘‘Application for Inclusion on the SwissU.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators’’ (as applicable).
Applications must include the following
information, and each section of the
application should be labeled and
numbered as indicated below:
—Applicant’s name.
—Applicant’s mailing address,
telephone number, and email address.
1. Independence
—Description of the applicant’s
affiliations with any organization that
has self-certified under the EU-U.S.
DPF or the Swiss-U.S. DPF, or the
United States, European Union, any
EU Member State, Switzerland, or any
other governmental authority, public
authority, or enforcement authority.
2. Integrity
—The respective names, job titles (as
applicable), mailing addresses,
telephone numbers, and email
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addresses of three individuals willing
to provide information concerning the
applicant’s qualifications for service,
including the applicant’s character,
reputation, reliability, and judgment.
—Description of the applicant’s
willingness and ability to make time
commitments necessary to be an
arbitrator.
3. Expertise
—Demonstration of admittance to
practice law in the United States.
—Relevant academic degrees and
professional training and licensing.
—Current employment, including job
title and description of responsibility,
as well as name and mailing address
of employer, and name, job title,
telephone number, and email address
of supervisor or other reference.
—Employment history, including the
dates and mailing addresses of each
prior position and a summary of
responsibilities.
—Description of expertise in U.S.
privacy law and EU and/or Swiss data
protection law (as applicable), and, as
appropriate, any other European data
protection law.
—Description of training or experience
in arbitration or other forms of
dispute resolution, if applicable.
—A list of publications, testimony, and
speeches, if any, concerning U.S.
privacy law and EU and/or Swiss data
protection law (as applicable).
II. Method of Collection
Individuals interested in being
considered for inclusion on the EU-U.S.
DPF List of Arbitrators or the Swiss-U.S.
DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators
would submit their applications to the
DOC online via email at dpf.program@
trade.gov.
The DOC previously requested and
obtained approval of analogous
information collections that have
allowed the DOC, as represented by
ITA, to collect information from
applicants for inclusion on the EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators (OMB
Control No. 0625–0277) and from
applicants for inclusion on the SwissU.S. Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators
(OMB Control No. 0625–0278). Pursuant
to the EU-U.S. DPF, the EU-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework Principles will be
amended as the ‘‘EU-U.S. Data Privacy
Framework Principles’’; and pursuant to
the Swiss-U.S. DPF, the Swiss-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework Principles
will be amended as the ‘‘Swiss-U.S.
Data Privacy Framework Principles’’.
Organizations that self-certified their
commitment to comply with the EUU.S. Privacy Shield Framework
Principles and/or the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework Principles that wish
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 2023 / Notices
to enjoy the benefits of participating in
the EU-U.S. DPF and/or the Swiss-U.S.
DPF (as applicable) must comply with
the amended Principles once those
amendments have entered into effect.
More information on the binding
arbitration option under the Data
Privacy Framework program will be
made available on the DOC’s Data
Privacy Framework program website
(https://www.dataprivacyframework.
gov/) once that is launched; however,
such information will also be made
available, as appropriate, on the DOC’s
Privacy Shield program website (https://
www.privacyshield.gov/welcome).
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: New
collection. Not yet assigned.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission,
new information collection.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
36.
Estimated Time per Response: 240
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 144.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The DOC’s statutory
authority to foster, promote, and
develop the foreign and domestic
commerce of the United States (15
U.S.C. 1512).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
IV. Request for Comments
We are soliciting public comments to
permit the Department/Bureau to: (a)
Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of our estimate of the time and
cost burden for this proposed collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
Evaluate ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) Minimize the
reporting burden on those who are to
respond, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this information
collection request (ICR). Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Mar 29, 2023
Jkt 259001
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,
Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2023–06647 Filed 3–29–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
International Trade Administration
[C–570–057]
Certain Tool Chests and Cabinets
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of the Expedited First
Sunset Review of the Countervailing
Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited
sunset review, the U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the countervailing duty
(CVD) order on certain tool chests and
cabinets (tool chests and cabinets) from
the People’s Republic of China (China)
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of countervailable
subsidies at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable March 30, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Claudia Cott, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4270.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On January 24, 2018, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
CVD order on tool chests from China.1
On December 1, 2022, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
Initiation Notice of the first five-year
sunset review of the Order pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act).2 In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) and (ii),
1 See Certain Tool Chests and Cabinets from the
People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty
Order, 83 FR 3299 (January 24, 2018) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87
FR 73757 (December 1, 2022) (Initiation Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19065
Commerce received a timely notice of
intent to participate in this sunset
review from Stanley Black & Decker (the
domestic interested party) within 15
days after the date of publication of the
Initiation Notice.3 The domestic
interested party claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act
as a producer of a domestic like product
in the United States.4
Commerce received a timely and
adequate substantive response to the
Initiation Notice from the domestic
interested party within the 30-day
period specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).5 Commerce received no
substantive responses from any other
interested parties, including the
Government of China, nor was a hearing
requested. On January 25, 2023,
Commerce notified the U.S.
International Trade Commission that it
did not receive an adequate substantive
response from other interested parties.6
As a result, in accordance with section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted an expedited, i.e., 120-day,
sunset review of the Order.
Scope of the Order
The scope of the Order covers certain
metal tool chests and tool cabinets, with
drawers, from China. The scope covers
all metal tool chests and cabinets,
including top chests, intermediate
chests, tool cabinets and side cabinets,
storage units, mobile work benches, and
work stations and that have the
following physical characteristics:
(1) a body made of carbon, alloy, or
stainless steel and/or other metals;
(2) two or more drawers for storage in
each individual unit;
(3) a width (side to side) exceeding 15
inches for side cabinets and exceeding
21 inches for all other individual units
but not exceeding 60 inches;
(4) a body depth (front to back)
exceeding 10 inches but not exceeding
24 inches; and
(5) prepackaged for retail sale.
3 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Five
Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order on Tool Chests and Cabinets from China—
Domestic Interested Party’s Notice of Intent to
Participate,’’ dated December 15, 2022. The
petitioner in the underlying investigation, Waterloo
Industries Inc. (Waterloo), was acquired by Stanley
Black & Decker Corporation on July 28, 2017, and
now operates under the Stanley Black & Decker
name.
4 Id.
5 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Five
Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order on Tool Chests and Cabinets from China—
Domestic Interested Party’s Substantive Response,’’
dated January 3, 2023 (Substantive Response).
6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews
Initiated December 1, 2022,’’ dated January 25,
2023.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19062-19065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06647]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under
the Data Privacy Framework Program
AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of information collection, request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information
collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The
purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment
preceding submission of the collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration, comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received on or before May 30, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to
Leo Kim, ITA Paperwork Clearance Officer, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, Room 23016RA, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the internet at
[email protected]). Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
specific questions related to collection activities should be directed
to David Ritchie, Senior Policy Advisor, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce via email at
[email protected], or by telephone at 202-482-1512.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States, the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom
(UK), and Switzerland share a commitment to enhancing privacy
protection, the rule of law, and a recognition of the importance of
transatlantic data flows to our respective citizens, economies, and
societies, but take different approaches to doing so. Given those
differences, the Department of Commerce (DOC)
[[Page 19063]]
developed the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (EU-U.S. DPF), the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (UK Extension to the
EU-U.S. DPF), and the Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (Swiss-U.S.
DPF) in consultation with the European Commission, the UK Government,
the Swiss Federal Administration, industry, and other stakeholders.
These arrangements were respectively developed to provide U.S.
organizations reliable mechanisms for personal data transfers to the
United States from the European Union, the United Kingdom, and
Switzerland while ensuring data protection that is consistent with EU,
UK, and Swiss law.
The DOC is issuing the EU-U.S. DPF Principles and the Swiss-U.S.
DPF Principles, including the respective sets of Supplemental
Principles (collectively the Principles) and Annex I of the Principles,
as well as the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF under its statutory
authority to foster, promote, and develop international commerce (15
U.S.C. 1512). The International Trade Administration (ITA) will
administer and supervise the Data Privacy Framework program, including
maintaining and making publicly available the Data Privacy Framework
List, an authoritative list of U.S. organizations that have self-
certified to the DOC and declared their commitment to adhere to the
Principles pursuant to the EU-U.S. DPF and, as applicable, the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and/or the Swiss-U.S. DPF. While the
decision by an organization to self-certify its compliance pursuant to
the EU-U.S. DPF and, as applicable the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF,
and/or the Swiss-U.S. DPF and by extension participate in the Data
Privacy Framework program is voluntary; effective compliance is
compulsory: organizations that self-certify to the DOC and publicly
declare their commitment to adhere to the Principles must comply fully
with the Principles. Such commitments to comply with the Principles are
legally enforceable under U.S. law. On the basis of the Principles,
Executive Order 14086, 28 CFR part 201, and accompanying letters and
materials, including ITA's commitments regarding the administration and
supervision of the Data Privacy Framework program, it is the DOC's
expectation that the European Commission, the UK Government, and the
Swiss Federal Administration will respectively recognize the adequacy
of the protection provided by the EU-U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the
EU-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF thereby enabling personal data
transfers from each respective jurisdiction to U.S. organizations
participating in the relevant part of the Data Privacy Framework
program. The EU-U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and the
Swiss-U.S. DPF will not enter into effect until they have respectively
received such recognition (i.e., until such formal recognition enters
into effect).
As respectively described in Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles,
the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles the DOC commits separately with the European Commission, the
UK Government, and the Swiss Federal Administration to implement an
arbitration mechanism to provide EU, UK, and Swiss individuals with the
ability under certain circumstances to invoke binding arbitration to
determine, for residual claims, whether an organization has violated
its obligations under the Principles as to those individuals.
Organizations that self-certify their compliance pursuant to the EU-
U.S. DPF, including those that also elect to participate in the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF are obligated to arbitrate claims and
follow the terms as set forth in Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles,
provided that an EU or UK (as applicable) individual has invoked
binding arbitration by delivering notice to the organization at issue
and following the procedures and subject to the conditions set forth in
Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles. Organizations that self-certify
their compliance pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF are obligated to
arbitrate claims and follow the terms as set forth in Annex I of the
Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles, provided that a Swiss individual has invoked
binding arbitration by delivering notice to the organization at issue
and following the procedures and subject to the conditions set forth in
Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles. An individual's decision to
invoke this binding arbitration option is entirely voluntary. Arbitral
decisions will be binding on all parties to the arbitration. Under this
binding arbitration option, a panel (consisting of one or three
arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has the authority to impose
individual-specific, non-monetary equitable relief (such as access,
correction, deletion, or return of the individual's data in question)
necessary to remedy the violation of the Principles only with respect
to the individual. No damages, costs, fees, or other remedies are
available. The parties will select the arbitrators from the list(s) of
arbitrators described below.
Pursuant to the EU-U.S. DPF and the UK Extension to the EU-U.S.
DPF, the DOC and the European Commission will develop and seek to
maintain a list of at least 10 arbitrators. The parties, including the
EU or UK individual who has invoked binding arbitration, will select
arbitrators for the arbitration panel from that list of arbitrators
developed under the EU-U.S. DPF (EU-U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators). To
be eligible for inclusion on the EU-U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators,
applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United States and be
experts in U.S. privacy law, with expertise in EU data protection law;
and shall not be subject to any instructions from, or be affiliated
with, either party, or any participating organization, or the United
States, European Union, or any EU Member State or any other
governmental authority, public authority, or enforcement authority.
Arbitrators will remain on the EU-U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators for a
period of 3 years, absent exceptional circumstances or removal for
cause, renewable by the DOC, with prior notification to the European
Commission for additional 3-year terms.
Pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF the DOC and the Swiss Federal
Administration will develop and seek to maintain a list of up to five
arbitrators to supplement the list of arbitrators developed under the
EU-U.S. DPF. The parties, including the Swiss individual who has
invoked binding arbitration, will select arbitrators for the
arbitration panel from the list of arbitrators developed under the EU-
U.S. DPF, as supplemented by the list of arbitrators developed under
the Swiss-U.S. DPF (Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators).
To be eligible for inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators, applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United
States and be experts in U.S. privacy law, with expertise in European
or Swiss data protection law; and shall not be subject to any
instructions from, or be affiliated with, either party, or any
participating organization, or the United States, Switzerland, European
Union, or any EU Member State or any other governmental authority,
public authority, or enforcement authority. Arbitrators will remain on
the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators for a period of 3
years, absent exceptional circumstances or removal for cause, renewable
by the DOC, with prior notification to the Swiss Federal Administration
for additional 3-year terms.
[[Page 19064]]
To be considered for inclusion on the EU-U.S. DPF List of
Arbitrators or the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators,
eligible individuals will be respectively evaluated by the DOC and the
European Commission and the DOC and the Swiss Federal Administration on
the basis of independence, integrity, and expertise:
Independence:
--Freedom from bias and prejudice.
Integrity:
--Held in the highest regard by peers for integrity, fairness, and good
judgment.
--Demonstrates high ethical standards and commitment necessary to be an
arbitrator.
Expertise:
--Required expertise:
--Admission to practice law in the United States.
--Level of demonstrated expertise in U.S. privacy law and EU and/or
Swiss data protection law (as applicable).
--Other expertise that may be considered includes any of the following:
--Relevant educational degrees and professional licenses.
--Relevant professional or academic experience or legal practice.
--Relevant training or experience in arbitration or other forms of
dispute resolution.
The DOC has agreed with the European Commission to the adoption of
arbitration rules that govern arbitration proceedings and a code of
conduct for arbitrators under the EU-U.S. DPF (and similarly agreed
with the UK Government as relates to arbitration proceedings under the
UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF), and the Swiss Federal Administration
to the adoption of arbitration rules that govern arbitration
proceedings and a code of conduct for arbitrators under the Swiss-U.S.
DPF. In the event that the rules governing the proceedings and/or the
code of conduct for arbitrators need to be changed, the DOC and the
European Commission and the Swiss Federal Administration will agree to
amend those rules or adopt a different set of existing, well-
established U.S. arbitral procedures, and/or amend the code of conduct
for arbitrators (as applicable).
The DOC has selected the International Centre for Dispute
Resolution (ICDR), the international division of the American
Arbitration Association (AAA) (collectively ICDR-AAA) to administer
arbitrations pursuant to and manage the arbitral fund identified in
Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles, including as relates to the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles. Among other things, the ICDR-AAA facilitates arbitrator fee
arrangements, including the collection and timely payment of arbitrator
fees and other expenses. On September 15, 2017, the DOC and the
European Commission agreed to the adoption of a set of arbitration
rules to govern binding arbitration proceedings described in Annex I of
the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework Principles, as well as a code of
conduct for arbitrators that is consistent with generally accepted
ethical standards for commercial arbitrators and Annex I of the
Principles. On March 29, 2018, the DOC and the Swiss Federal
Administration agreed to the adoption of a set of arbitration rules to
govern binding arbitration proceedings described in Annex I of the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework Principles, as well as a code of
conduct for arbitrators that is consistent with generally accepted
ethical standards for commercial arbitrators and Annex I of the
Principles. The DOC has respectively agreed with the European
Commission (and the UK Government, as appropriate, with regard to the
UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF) and the Swiss Federal Administration
to adapt those sets of arbitration rules and codes of conduct to
reflect the updates under the EU-U.S. DPF (including as applicable to
the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF) and the Swiss-U.S. DPF, and the
DOC will work with the ICDR-AAA to make those updates.
Applications:
Applications must be typewritten, electronically submitted, and
headed ``Application for Inclusion on the EU-U.S. DPF List of
Arbitrators'' or ``Application for Inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Supplemental List of Arbitrators'' (as applicable). Applications must
include the following information, and each section of the application
should be labeled and numbered as indicated below:
--Applicant's name.
--Applicant's mailing address, telephone number, and email address.
1. Independence
--Description of the applicant's affiliations with any organization
that has self-certified under the EU-U.S. DPF or the Swiss-U.S. DPF, or
the United States, European Union, any EU Member State, Switzerland, or
any other governmental authority, public authority, or enforcement
authority.
2. Integrity
--The respective names, job titles (as applicable), mailing addresses,
telephone numbers, and email addresses of three individuals willing to
provide information concerning the applicant's qualifications for
service, including the applicant's character, reputation, reliability,
and judgment.
--Description of the applicant's willingness and ability to make time
commitments necessary to be an arbitrator.
3. Expertise
--Demonstration of admittance to practice law in the United States.
--Relevant academic degrees and professional training and licensing.
--Current employment, including job title and description of
responsibility, as well as name and mailing address of employer, and
name, job title, telephone number, and email address of supervisor or
other reference.
--Employment history, including the dates and mailing addresses of each
prior position and a summary of responsibilities.
--Description of expertise in U.S. privacy law and EU and/or Swiss data
protection law (as applicable), and, as appropriate, any other European
data protection law.
--Description of training or experience in arbitration or other forms
of dispute resolution, if applicable.
--A list of publications, testimony, and speeches, if any, concerning
U.S. privacy law and EU and/or Swiss data protection law (as
applicable).
II. Method of Collection
Individuals interested in being considered for inclusion on the EU-
U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators or the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators would submit their applications to the DOC online via email
at [email protected].
The DOC previously requested and obtained approval of analogous
information collections that have allowed the DOC, as represented by
ITA, to collect information from applicants for inclusion on the EU-
U.S. Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators (OMB Control No. 0625-0277) and
from applicants for inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield List of
Arbitrators (OMB Control No. 0625-0278). Pursuant to the EU-U.S. DPF,
the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework Principles will be amended as the
``EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework Principles''; and pursuant to the
Swiss-U.S. DPF, the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework Principles will
be amended as the ``Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework Principles''.
Organizations that self-certified their commitment to comply with the
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework Principles and/or the Swiss-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework Principles that wish
[[Page 19065]]
to enjoy the benefits of participating in the EU-U.S. DPF and/or the
Swiss-U.S. DPF (as applicable) must comply with the amended Principles
once those amendments have entered into effect. More information on the
binding arbitration option under the Data Privacy Framework program
will be made available on the DOC's Data Privacy Framework program
website (https://www.dataprivacyframework.gov/) once that is launched;
however, such information will also be made available, as appropriate,
on the DOC's Privacy Shield program website (https://www.privacyshield.gov/welcome).
III. Data
OMB Control Number: New collection. Not yet assigned.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission, new information collection.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 36.
Estimated Time per Response: 240 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 144.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The DOC's statutory authority to foster, promote,
and develop the foreign and domestic commerce of the United States (15
U.S.C. 1512).
IV. Request for Comments
We are soliciting public comments to permit the Department/Bureau
to: (a) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper functions of the Department, including whether
the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy
of our estimate of the time and cost burden for this proposed
collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (c) Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (d) Minimize the reporting burden
on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this information collection request (ICR). Before
including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be
made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for
Economic Affairs, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2023-06647 Filed 3-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P