Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation, 18177-18179 [2023-06222]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 / Notices
Watauga County
Blue Ridge Tourist Court, 574, 560 Old East
King St., 173, 187, 191 Cecil Miller Rd.,
Boone, SG100008846
TEXAS
Travis County
Hanako House, 4022 Greenhill Pl., Austin,
SG100008841
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
WISCONSIN
Milwaukee County
Wauwatosa Cemetery Chapel, 2445
Wauwatosa Ave., Wauwatosa,
SG100008855
Additional documentation has been
received for the following resources:
MISSISSIPPI
Jackson County
Scranton Historic District (Additional
Documentation) (Pascagoula MPS),
Roughly bounded by Krebs Ave.,
Pascagoula St., Convent Ave., and Frederic
St., Pascagoula, AD100007019, Comment
period: 0 days
NORTH CAROLINA
Guilford County
Downtown Greensboro Historic District
(Additional Documentation) (Greensboro
MPS), Roughly bounded by Davie, North
Elm, North and South Green, East and
West Lewis, West Market, and West
Washington Sts., East and West Friendly
and Summit Aves., West Gate City Blvd.,
and Southern Railway right of way,
Greensboro, MP82003458
Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR
part 60.
Dated: March 15, 2023.
Sherry A. Frear,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/
National Historic Landmarks Program.
[FR Doc. 2023–06206 Filed 3–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–NCR–WHHO–WHHOA1–35493;
PPNCWHHOA1; PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]
Committee for the Preservation of the
White House; Notice of Public Meeting
National Park Service, Interior.
Meeting notice.
AGENCY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act of
1972, the National Park Service (NPS) is
hereby giving notice that the Committee
for the Preservation of the White House
(Committee) will meet as indicated
below.
DATES: The meeting will take place on
Monday, April 17, 2023. The meeting
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
will begin at 10:00 a.m. until 11:30 a.m.
(Eastern).
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the White House, 1600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500.
The meeting will be open to the public,
but subject to security clearance
requirements.
19:19 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
Comments may be provided to: John
Stanwich, Executive Secretary,
Committee for the Preservation of the
White House, 1849 C Street NW, Room
#1426, Washington, DC 20240, by
telephone (202) 219–0322, or by email
ncr_whho_superintendent@nps.gov.
Please make requests in advance for sign
language interpreter services, assistive
listening devices, or other reasonable
accommodations at least seven (7)
business days prior to the meeting to
give the Department of the Interior
sufficient time to process your request.
All reasonable accommodation requests
are managed on a case-by-case basis.
Individuals in the United States who
are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability may dial 711
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Committee has been established in
accordance with Executive Order No.
11145, 3 CFR 184 (1964–1965), as
amended. The Committee reports to the
President of the United States and
advises the Director of the NPS with
respect to the discharge of
responsibilities for the preservation and
interpretation of the museum aspects of
the White House pursuant to the Act of
September 22, 1961 (Pub. L. 87–286, 75
Stat. 586).
Purpose of the Meeting: The agenda
will include policies, goals, and longrange plans.
If you plan to attend this meeting, you
must register by close of business on
Thursday, April 13, 2023. Please contact
the Executive Secretary (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) to
register. Space is limited and requests
will be accommodated in the order they
are received.
The meeting will be open, but subject
to security clearance requirements. The
Executive Secretary will contact you
directly with the security clearance
requirements. Inquiries may be made by
calling the Executive Secretary between
9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. weekdays at
(202) 219–0322.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18177
Written comments may be sent to the
Executive Secretary, Committee for the
Preservation of the White House (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). All
written comments received will be
provided to the Committee.
Public Disclosure of Comments:
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
written comments, you should be aware
that your entire comment—including
your personal identifying information—
may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 10.)
Alma Ripps,
Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–06302 Filed 3–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1252]
Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning
Devices and Components Thereof;
Notice of Commission Final
Determination Finding a Violation of
Section 337; Issuance of a Limited
Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist
Orders; Termination of the
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, in the above-captioned
investigation. The Commission has
issued a limited exclusion order
(‘‘LEO’’) prohibiting the importation of
certain robotic floor cleaning devices
and components thereof that are
imported by or on behalf of SharkNinja
Operating LLC, SharkNinja Management
LLC, SharkNinja Management Co.,
SharkNinja Sales Co., EP Midco LLC,
and SharkNinja Hong Kong Co. Ltd.,
and that infringe claims 1 and 9 of U.S.
Patent No. 10,813,517 (‘‘the ’517
patent’’). The Commission has also
issued cease and desist orders (‘‘CDOs’’)
against each Respondent. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Houda Morad, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
18178
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 / Notices
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–4716. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on March 2, 2021, based on a complaint
filed on behalf of iRobot Corporation
(‘‘iRobot’’ or ‘‘Complainant’’) of
Bedford, Massachusetts. See 86 FR
12206–07 (Mar. 2, 2021). The complaint
alleged violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain robotic floor cleaning devices
and components thereof based on the
infringement of certain claims of the
’517 patent; as well as U.S. Patent Nos.
9,884,423 (‘‘the ’423 patent’’); 7,571,511
(‘‘the ’511 patent’’); 10,835,096 (‘‘the
’096 patent’’); and 10,296,007 (‘‘the ’007
patent’’). See id. The Commission’s
notice of investigation named as
respondents SharkNinja Operating LLC,
SharkNinja Management LLC,
SharkNinja Management Co.,
SharkNinja Sales Co., and EP Midco
LLC, all of Needham, Massachusetts;
and SharkNinja Hong Kong Co. Ltd. of
Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
(collectively, ‘‘SharkNinja’’ or
‘‘Respondents’’). See id. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations is not
participating in the investigation. See
id.
The ’007 patent has been terminated
from the investigation. See Order No. 23
(Sept. 13, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n
Notice (Oct. 5, 2021); Order No. 38 (Jan.
4, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice
(Jan. 25, 2022). Accordingly, claims 9,
12, and 23 of the ’423 patent; claims 12
and 23 of the ’511 patent; claims 1 and
9 of the ’517 patent; and claims 17 and
26 of the ’096 patent were still pending
before the Administrative Law Judge
(‘‘ALJ’’).
On December 30, 2021, the ALJ issued
a Markman Order (Order No. 37)
construing the claim terms in dispute
for all asserted patents.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
On October 7, 2022, the ALJ issued a
final initial determination (‘‘FID’’)
finding: (1) a violation of section 337
based on infringement of claims 9 and
12 of the ’423 patent and claims 1 and
9 of the ’517 patent; (2) no infringement
of claim 23 of the ’423 patent; (3) no
violation as to claims 17 and 26 of the
’096 patent; and (4) no violation as to
claims 12 and 23 of the ’511 patent. The
ALJ recommended, should the
Commission find a violation, issuing a
limited exclusion order directed to
SharkNinja’s infringing products and a
cease and desist order directed to each
SharkNinja entity and setting a bond in
the amount of twenty percent (20%) for
importation of infringing articles during
the period of Presidential review.
On October 24, 2022, SharkNinja and
iRobot each petitioned for review of
certain aspects of the FID. On November
1, 2022, SharkNinja and iRobot each
filed a response in opposition to each
other’s petition for review.
The Commission received no public
interest comments from the public in
response to the Commission’s Federal
Register notice seeking comments on
the public interest. See 87 FR 62451–52
(Oct. 14, 2022). iRobot submitted public
interest comments pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.50(a)(4) (19 CFR
210.50(a)(4)) on November 9, 2022.
On January 4, 2023, the Commission
determined to review certain aspects of
the FID and requested submissions from
the parties on certain issues under
review. See 88 FR 1405–07 (Jan. 10,
2023). The Commission also requested
written submissions from the parties,
interested government agencies, and
other interested persons on the issues of
remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. See id. Specifically, the
Commission determined to review: (1)
for the ’511 patent, the FID’s finding
that estoppel applies to the Trilobite
prior art device and claims 1, 10, 12,
and 23 are invalid based on the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board’s (‘‘PTAB’’)
finding that the claims are unpatentable;
(2) for the ’423 patent, the FID’s findings
that: (i) claim 9 of the ’423 patent is
practiced by the domestic industry
(‘‘DI’’) products; (ii) SharkNinja’s
accused robots with forward-docking,
i.e., the IQ, AI, and AI–WD products, do
not infringe claim 23 of the ’423 patent;
(iii) the prior art Dottie robot does not
anticipate claim 23 of the ’423 patent;
(iv) the prior art combination of Dottie
and Everett and the prior art
combination of Dottie and Kim do not
render claims 12 or 23, respectively, of
the ’423 patent obvious under 35 U.S.C.
103; (v) iRobot presented insufficient
evidence of secondary considerations of
non-obviousness with respect to claim
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23; and (vi) claim 23 of the ’423 patent
is directed to patent-eligible subject
matter under 35 U.S.C. 101; (3) for the
’517 patent, the ALJ’s construction and
finding that (i) the ‘‘receiving system’’
for claims 1 and 9 is not means-plusfunction; (ii) claims 1 and 9 are
infringed by SharkNinja’s accused
products; (iii) claims 1 and 9 are
practiced by iRobot’s DI products; and
(iv) claims 1 and 9 are not anticipated
by the asserted prior art (Kawakami);
and (4) for all asserted patents, i.e., the
’511, ’423, ’517, and ’096 patents, the
ID’s finding that iRobot satisfied the
economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement. See Comm’n
Notice (Jan. 4, 2023); 88 FR 1405–07
(Jan. 10, 2023).
In response to the Commission’s
notice, on January 18, 2023, iRobot and
SharkNinja each filed a brief on the
requested issues under review, remedy,
the public interest, and bonding. On
January 25, 2023, the parties filed reply
briefs. The Commission received no
other submissions.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the FID, the RD,
and the parties’ submissions, the
Commission has determined to affirm
with modification the FID’s
determination of a violation of section
337 with respect to claims 1 and 9 of the
’517 patent. The Commission reverses
and finds no violation as to the asserted
claims of the ’423 patent. Specifically,
as explained in the Commission
Opinion filed concurrently herewith,
the Commission has determined to:
• vacate the FID’s findings as to the
’511 patent, which was found
unpatentable by the PTAB and no
appeal was taken from that PTAB
determination;
• reverse the FID’s finding that
iRobot’s DI products practice claim 9 of
the ’423 patent and thus the finding that
iRobot satisfied the technical prong of
the domestic industry requirement
based on a valid claim;
• reverse the FID’s finding that claim
12 of the ’423 patent is not obvious over
Dottie in view of Everett under 35
U.S.C. 103;
• reverse the FID’s finding that
certain accused products do not infringe
claim 23 of the ’423 patent;
• take no position with respect to the
FID’s finding that claim 23 of the ’423
patent is not anticipated by Dottie under
35 U.S.C. 102;
• reverse the FID’s finding that claim
23 of the ’423 patent is not obvious over
Dottie in view of Kim under 35 U.S.C.
103;
• take no position with respect to the
FID’s finding that claim 23 of the ’423
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 2023 / Notices
patent is patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C.
101;
• modify and supplement the FID’s
claim construction of the term
‘‘receiving system’’;
• affirm with modification the FID’s
finding that SharkNinja’s accused
products infringe the asserted claims of
the ’517 patent;
• affirm with modification the FID’s
finding that iRobot’s DI products
practice the asserted claims of the ’517
patent; and
• affirm and supplement the FID’s
finding that the asserted claims of the
’517 patent are not anticipated by
Kawakami under 35 U.S.C. 102;
• affirm the FID’s findings that iRobot
satisfies the economic prong of the
domestic industry requirement with
respect to the ’517 patent and take no
position as to those findings with
respect to the ’511,’423, or ’096 patents.
All findings in the FID that are not
inconsistent with the Commission’s
determination are affirmed.
The Commission has determined that
the appropriate remedy is an LEO
against Respondents’ infringing
products and a CDO against each
Respondent. The Commission has also
determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in subsection
337(d)(1) and (f)(1) (19 U.S.C.
1337(d)(1), (f)(1)) do not preclude the
issuance of the LEO and CDOs. The
Commission has further determined to
set a bond during the period of
Presidential review in the amount of
twenty percent (20%) of the entered
value of Respondents’ infringing
products (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)).
The Commission’s orders and opinion
were delivered to the President and to
the United States Trade Representative
on the day of their issuance.
The Commission’s vote for this
determination took place on March 21,
2023.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 21, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Pistoia Alliance, Inc.
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control
Association
Notice is hereby given that, on
January 17, 2023, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (the ‘‘Act’’),
Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Semantic Arts, Fort
Collins, CO; Digital Science, London,
UNITED KINGDOM; Crownpoint
Technologies, Columbia, MD; Charles
River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA;
Servier, Iˆle-de-France, FRANCE; and
Arcondis, Kanton Reinach,
SWITZERLAND have been added as
parties to this venture.
Also, Rapid Novor, Waterloo,
CANADA; IonQ Inc., College Park, MD;
Phesi LLC, East Lyme, CT; McKinsey &
Company, Berlin, GERMANY; Owkin,
New York, NY; gliff.ai, Durham,
UNITED KINGDOM; UMEDEOR LTD,
London, UNITED KINGDOM; and
Dynaccurate, Esch-sur-Alzette,
LUXEMBOURG have withdrawn as
parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and Pistoia
Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all
changes in membership.
On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance,
Inc. filed its original notification
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The
Department of Justice published a notice
in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009
(74 FR 34364).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on October 26, 2022.
The Department of Justice published a
notice in the Federal Register pursuant
to Section 6(b) of the Act on November
23, 2022 (87 FR 71680).
Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director, Civil Enforcement
Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023–06222 Filed 3–24–23; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2023–06188 Filed 3–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Mar 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
18179
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice is hereby given that, on March
8, 2023, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD Copy Control
Association (‘‘DVD CCA’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances.
Specifically, Jiangsu Xinguanglian
Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu,
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA;
Lightcomm Technology Co., Ltd.,
Sheung Wan, HONG KONG SAR; and
Shenzhen Soling Industrial Co., Ltd.,
Guangdong, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
CHINA, have withdrawn as parties to
this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the venture. Membership in
this venture remains open, and DVD
CCA intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on December 7, 2022. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on January 24, 2023 (88 FR 4211).
Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director, Civil Enforcement
Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023–06221 Filed 3–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—AI Infrastructure Alliance,
Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
January 20, 2023, pursuant to Section
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 58 (Monday, March 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18177-18179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06222]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1252]
Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof;
Notice of Commission Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section
337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission
has issued a limited exclusion order (``LEO'') prohibiting the
importation of certain robotic floor cleaning devices and components
thereof that are imported by or on behalf of SharkNinja Operating LLC,
SharkNinja Management LLC, SharkNinja Management Co., SharkNinja Sales
Co., EP Midco LLC, and SharkNinja Hong Kong Co. Ltd., and that infringe
claims 1 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 10,813,517 (``the '517 patent''). The
Commission has also issued cease and desist orders (``CDOs'') against
each Respondent. The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
[[Page 18178]]
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-
4716. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with
this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on March 2, 2021, based on a complaint filed on behalf of iRobot
Corporation (``iRobot'' or ``Complainant'') of Bedford, Massachusetts.
See 86 FR 12206-07 (Mar. 2, 2021). The complaint alleged violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,
based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain robotic floor cleaning devices and components thereof based on
the infringement of certain claims of the '517 patent; as well as U.S.
Patent Nos. 9,884,423 (``the '423 patent''); 7,571,511 (``the '511
patent''); 10,835,096 (``the '096 patent''); and 10,296,007 (``the '007
patent''). See id. The Commission's notice of investigation named as
respondents SharkNinja Operating LLC, SharkNinja Management LLC,
SharkNinja Management Co., SharkNinja Sales Co., and EP Midco LLC, all
of Needham, Massachusetts; and SharkNinja Hong Kong Co. Ltd. of Hong
Kong Island, Hong Kong (collectively, ``SharkNinja'' or
``Respondents''). See id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is
not participating in the investigation. See id.
The '007 patent has been terminated from the investigation. See
Order No. 23 (Sept. 13, 2021), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 5,
2021); Order No. 38 (Jan. 4, 2022), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Jan.
25, 2022). Accordingly, claims 9, 12, and 23 of the '423 patent; claims
12 and 23 of the '511 patent; claims 1 and 9 of the '517 patent; and
claims 17 and 26 of the '096 patent were still pending before the
Administrative Law Judge (``ALJ'').
On December 30, 2021, the ALJ issued a Markman Order (Order No. 37)
construing the claim terms in dispute for all asserted patents.
On October 7, 2022, the ALJ issued a final initial determination
(``FID'') finding: (1) a violation of section 337 based on infringement
of claims 9 and 12 of the '423 patent and claims 1 and 9 of the '517
patent; (2) no infringement of claim 23 of the '423 patent; (3) no
violation as to claims 17 and 26 of the '096 patent; and (4) no
violation as to claims 12 and 23 of the '511 patent. The ALJ
recommended, should the Commission find a violation, issuing a limited
exclusion order directed to SharkNinja's infringing products and a
cease and desist order directed to each SharkNinja entity and setting a
bond in the amount of twenty percent (20%) for importation of
infringing articles during the period of Presidential review.
On October 24, 2022, SharkNinja and iRobot each petitioned for
review of certain aspects of the FID. On November 1, 2022, SharkNinja
and iRobot each filed a response in opposition to each other's petition
for review.
The Commission received no public interest comments from the public
in response to the Commission's Federal Register notice seeking
comments on the public interest. See 87 FR 62451-52 (Oct. 14, 2022).
iRobot submitted public interest comments pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(a)(4) (19 CFR 210.50(a)(4)) on November 9, 2022.
On January 4, 2023, the Commission determined to review certain
aspects of the FID and requested submissions from the parties on
certain issues under review. See 88 FR 1405-07 (Jan. 10, 2023). The
Commission also requested written submissions from the parties,
interested government agencies, and other interested persons on the
issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. See id.
Specifically, the Commission determined to review: (1) for the '511
patent, the FID's finding that estoppel applies to the Trilobite prior
art device and claims 1, 10, 12, and 23 are invalid based on the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board's (``PTAB'') finding that the claims are
unpatentable; (2) for the '423 patent, the FID's findings that: (i)
claim 9 of the '423 patent is practiced by the domestic industry
(``DI'') products; (ii) SharkNinja's accused robots with forward-
docking, i.e., the IQ, AI, and AI-WD products, do not infringe claim 23
of the '423 patent; (iii) the prior art Dottie robot does not
anticipate claim 23 of the '423 patent; (iv) the prior art combination
of Dottie and Everett and the prior art combination of Dottie and Kim
do not render claims 12 or 23, respectively, of the '423 patent obvious
under 35 U.S.C. 103; (v) iRobot presented insufficient evidence of
secondary considerations of non-obviousness with respect to claim 23;
and (vi) claim 23 of the '423 patent is directed to patent-eligible
subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101; (3) for the '517 patent, the ALJ's
construction and finding that (i) the ``receiving system'' for claims 1
and 9 is not means-plus-function; (ii) claims 1 and 9 are infringed by
SharkNinja's accused products; (iii) claims 1 and 9 are practiced by
iRobot's DI products; and (iv) claims 1 and 9 are not anticipated by
the asserted prior art (Kawakami); and (4) for all asserted patents,
i.e., the '511, '423, '517, and '096 patents, the ID's finding that
iRobot satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry
requirement. See Comm'n Notice (Jan. 4, 2023); 88 FR 1405-07 (Jan. 10,
2023).
In response to the Commission's notice, on January 18, 2023, iRobot
and SharkNinja each filed a brief on the requested issues under review,
remedy, the public interest, and bonding. On January 25, 2023, the
parties filed reply briefs. The Commission received no other
submissions.
Having examined the record of this investigation, including the
FID, the RD, and the parties' submissions, the Commission has
determined to affirm with modification the FID's determination of a
violation of section 337 with respect to claims 1 and 9 of the '517
patent. The Commission reverses and finds no violation as to the
asserted claims of the '423 patent. Specifically, as explained in the
Commission Opinion filed concurrently herewith, the Commission has
determined to:
vacate the FID's findings as to the '511 patent, which was
found unpatentable by the PTAB and no appeal was taken from that PTAB
determination;
reverse the FID's finding that iRobot's DI products
practice claim 9 of the '423 patent and thus the finding that iRobot
satisfied the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement
based on a valid claim;
reverse the FID's finding that claim 12 of the '423 patent
is not obvious over Dottie in view of Everett under 35 U.S.C. 103;
reverse the FID's finding that certain accused products do
not infringe claim 23 of the '423 patent;
take no position with respect to the FID's finding that
claim 23 of the '423 patent is not anticipated by Dottie under 35
U.S.C. 102;
reverse the FID's finding that claim 23 of the '423 patent
is not obvious over Dottie in view of Kim under 35 U.S.C. 103;
take no position with respect to the FID's finding that
claim 23 of the '423
[[Page 18179]]
patent is patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. 101;
modify and supplement the FID's claim construction of the
term ``receiving system'';
affirm with modification the FID's finding that
SharkNinja's accused products infringe the asserted claims of the '517
patent;
affirm with modification the FID's finding that iRobot's
DI products practice the asserted claims of the '517 patent; and
affirm and supplement the FID's finding that the asserted
claims of the '517 patent are not anticipated by Kawakami under 35
U.S.C. 102;
affirm the FID's findings that iRobot satisfies the
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement with respect to the
'517 patent and take no position as to those findings with respect to
the '511,'423, or '096 patents.
All findings in the FID that are not inconsistent with the
Commission's determination are affirmed.
The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is an LEO
against Respondents' infringing products and a CDO against each
Respondent. The Commission has also determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in subsection 337(d)(1) and (f)(1) (19 U.S.C.
1337(d)(1), (f)(1)) do not preclude the issuance of the LEO and CDOs.
The Commission has further determined to set a bond during the period
of Presidential review in the amount of twenty percent (20%) of the
entered value of Respondents' infringing products (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)).
The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President
and to the United States Trade Representative on the day of their
issuance.
The Commission's vote for this determination took place on March
21, 2023.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 21, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-06222 Filed 3-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
