Certain Mobile Telephones, Tablet Computers With Cellular Connectivity, and Smart Watches With Cellular Connectivity, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement and To Review and Take No Position on an Initial Determination Granting in Part a Motion for Summary Determination Concerning the Economic Prong of the Domestic Industry Requirement; Termination of the Investigation, 17016-17017 [2023-05746]

Download as PDF 17016 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2023 / Notices responsibilities under NAGPRA. The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the Filson Historical Society. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. Additional information on the determinations in this notice, including the results of consultation, can be found in the summary or related records held by the Filson Historical Society. Description On an unknown date prior to 1933, one unassociated funerary object was removed from a field in Hardin County, TN. This item was plowed up by an unknown farmer near the Tennessee River and opposite Pittsburg Landing. The Filson purchased this item from Ira Archer in 1933. The one unassociated funerary object is a shell gorget. On an unknown date, one unassociated funerary object was removed from an unknown location in Tennessee. A Filson catalog record created between 1940–1941 indicates this item was removed from a Native American burial ground. The one unassociated funerary object is a flint knife. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Cultural Affiliation The cultural items in this notice are connected to one or more identifiable earlier groups, tribes, peoples, or cultures. There is a relationship of shared group identity between the identifiable earlier groups, tribes, peoples, or cultures and one or more Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations. The following type of information was used to reasonably trace the relationship: geographical. BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1299] Requests for Repatriation Additional, written requests for repatriation of the cultural items in this 19:23 Mar 20, 2023 Jkt 259001 Dated: March 15, 2023. Melanie O’Brien, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2023–05732 Filed 3–20–23; 8:45 am] Determinations Pursuant to NAGPRA and its implementing regulations, and after consultation with the appropriate Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, the Filson Historical Society has determined that: • The two cultural items described above are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony and are believed, by a preponderance of the evidence, to have been removed from a specific burial site of a Native American individual. • There is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the cultural items and The Chickasaw Nation. VerDate Sep<11>2014 notice must be sent to the Responsible Official identified in ADDRESSES. Requests for repatriation may be submitted by any lineal descendant, Indian Tribe, or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice who shows, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the requestor is a lineal descendant or a culturally affiliated Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization. Repatriation of the cultural items in this notice to a requestor may occur on or after April 20, 2023. If competing requests for repatriation are received, the Filson Historical Society must determine the most appropriate requestor prior to repatriation. Requests for joint repatriation of the cultural items are considered a single request and not competing requests. The Filson Historical Society is responsible for sending a copy of this notice to the Indian Tribe identified in this notice. Authority: Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3003, and the implementing regulations, 43 CFR 10.8, 10.10, and 10.14. Certain Mobile Telephones, Tablet Computers With Cellular Connectivity, and Smart Watches With Cellular Connectivity, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement and To Review and Take No Position on an Initial Determination Granting in Part a Motion for Summary Determination Concerning the Economic Prong of the Domestic Industry Requirement; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 26) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the investigation on the basis of settlement and to review SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and take no position on an ID (Order No. 22) granting in part a motion for summary determination concerning the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin S. Richards, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5453. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on February 24, 2022. 87 FR 10384 (Feb. 24, 2022). The complaint, as filed and supplemented by Ericsson Inc. of Plano, TX and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of Stockholm, Sweden (collectively, ‘‘Ericsson’’), alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile telephones, tablet computers with cellular connectivity, and smart watches with cellular connectivity, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,102,805 (‘‘the ’805 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,532,355 (‘‘the ’355 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 11,139,872 (‘‘the ’872 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 10,425,817 (‘‘the ’817 patent’’). Id. The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission’s notice of investigation named Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, CA as the sole respondent. Id. at 10385. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is participating in the investigation. Id. On August 22, 2022, Ericsson moved unopposed for summary determination that it satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement of section 337 with respect to each of the four asserted patents based on showings pursuant to section 337(a)(3)(A) and (B). On November 15, 2022, the ALJ issued Order No. 22, which granted Ericsson’s motion in part. Specifically, the ID granted summary determination E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2023 / Notices that Ericsson satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement for the ’805, ’355, and ’872 patents based on showings under 337(a)(3)(A) and (B). For the ’817 patent, the ID found that Ericsson satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement based on its showing under section 337(a)(3)(A) only. The ID found that a genuine issue of material fact precluded granting summary determination as to the ’817 patent based on Ericsson’s showing under section 337(a)(3)(B). No petitions for review of Order No. 22 were filed. Thereafter, the Commission extended the time to determine whether to review Order No. 22 to March 16, 2023. On February 24, 2023, the ALJ issued Order No. 26, which granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate this investigation in its entirety on the basis of settlement between the parties. The ID found that the motion complied with the applicable Commission rules. See 19 CFR 210.21(b)(1). The ID also found that termination of the investigation based on settlement is not contrary to the public interest. No petitions for review of Order No. 26 were filed. The Commission has determined not to review Order No. 26 and to review and take no position on Order No. 22. This investigation is terminated in its entirety. The Commission vote for this determination took place on March 15, 2023. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 15, 2023. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–23–017] ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Sunshine Act Meetings United States International Trade Commission. TIME AND DATE: March 30, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205–2000. STATUS: Open to the public. AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 19:23 Mar 20, 2023 1. Agendas for future meetings: none. 2. Minutes. 3. Ratification List. 4. Commission vote on Inv. No. 731– TA–663 (Fifth Review) (Paper Clips from China). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on April 11, 2023. 5. Outstanding action jackets: none. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sharon Bellamy, Acting Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202– 205–2000. The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 17, 2023. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2023–05844 Filed 3–17–23; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1121–0312] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection: Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems (SSCHIS) Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice. ACTION: 60-Day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until May 22, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Devon Adams, Deputy Director, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street SUMMARY: [FR Doc. 2023–05746 Filed 3–20–23; 8:45 am] VerDate Sep<11>2014 MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17017 NW, Washington, DC 20531 (email: devon.adams@usdoj.gov; telephone: 202–305–0765). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently collection approved collection. (2) The Title of the Form/Collection: Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems (SSCHIS). (3) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: The form number is N/A. The applicable component within the Department of Justice is the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the Office of Justice Programs. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Respondents are state government agencies, primarily state criminal history record repositories. The SSCHIS report, the most comprehensive data available on the collection and maintenance of information by state criminal history record systems, describes the status of such systems and record repositories on a biennial basis. Data collected from state record repositories serves as the basis for estimating the percentage of total state records that are immediately available through the FBI’s Interstate E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17016-17017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-05746]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1299]


Certain Mobile Telephones, Tablet Computers With Cellular 
Connectivity, and Smart Watches With Cellular Connectivity, Components 
Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To 
Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on 
Settlement and To Review and Take No Position on an Initial 
Determination Granting in Part a Motion for Summary Determination 
Concerning the Economic Prong of the Domestic Industry Requirement; 
Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission (``Commission'') has determined not to review an initial 
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 26) of the presiding administrative 
law judge (``ALJ'') terminating the investigation on the basis of 
settlement and to review and take no position on an ID (Order No. 22) 
granting in part a motion for summary determination concerning the 
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The investigation 
is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin S. Richards, Esq., Office of 
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5453. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on February 24, 2022. 87 FR 10384 (Feb. 24, 2022). The complaint, as 
filed and supplemented by Ericsson Inc. of Plano, TX and 
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of Stockholm, Sweden (collectively, 
``Ericsson''), alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain mobile telephones, tablet computers with 
cellular connectivity, and smart watches with cellular connectivity, 
components thereof, and products containing same by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,102,805 (``the '805 
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,532,355 (``the '355 patent''); U.S. Patent 
No. 11,139,872 (``the '872 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 10,425,817 
(``the '817 patent''). Id. The complaint further alleges that a 
domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission's notice of investigation 
named Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, CA as the sole respondent. Id. at 
10385. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is participating in 
the investigation. Id.
    On August 22, 2022, Ericsson moved unopposed for summary 
determination that it satisfied the economic prong of the domestic 
industry requirement of section 337 with respect to each of the four 
asserted patents based on showings pursuant to section 337(a)(3)(A) and 
(B).
    On November 15, 2022, the ALJ issued Order No. 22, which granted 
Ericsson's motion in part. Specifically, the ID granted summary 
determination

[[Page 17017]]

that Ericsson satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry 
requirement for the '805, '355, and '872 patents based on showings 
under 337(a)(3)(A) and (B). For the '817 patent, the ID found that 
Ericsson satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry 
requirement based on its showing under section 337(a)(3)(A) only. The 
ID found that a genuine issue of material fact precluded granting 
summary determination as to the '817 patent based on Ericsson's showing 
under section 337(a)(3)(B). No petitions for review of Order No. 22 
were filed. Thereafter, the Commission extended the time to determine 
whether to review Order No. 22 to March 16, 2023.
    On February 24, 2023, the ALJ issued Order No. 26, which granted 
the parties' joint motion to terminate this investigation in its 
entirety on the basis of settlement between the parties. The ID found 
that the motion complied with the applicable Commission rules. See 19 
CFR 210.21(b)(1). The ID also found that termination of the 
investigation based on settlement is not contrary to the public 
interest. No petitions for review of Order No. 26 were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review Order No. 26 and to 
review and take no position on Order No. 22. This investigation is 
terminated in its entirety.
    The Commission vote for this determination took place on March 15, 
2023.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 15, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-05746 Filed 3-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.