Certain Mobile Telephones, Tablet Computers With Cellular Connectivity, and Smart Watches With Cellular Connectivity, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement and To Review and Take No Position on an Initial Determination Granting in Part a Motion for Summary Determination Concerning the Economic Prong of the Domestic Industry Requirement; Termination of the Investigation, 17016-17017 [2023-05746]
Download as PDF
17016
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2023 / Notices
responsibilities under NAGPRA. The
determinations in this notice are the
sole responsibility of the Filson
Historical Society. The National Park
Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
Additional information on the
determinations in this notice, including
the results of consultation, can be found
in the summary or related records held
by the Filson Historical Society.
Description
On an unknown date prior to 1933,
one unassociated funerary object was
removed from a field in Hardin County,
TN. This item was plowed up by an
unknown farmer near the Tennessee
River and opposite Pittsburg Landing.
The Filson purchased this item from Ira
Archer in 1933. The one unassociated
funerary object is a shell gorget.
On an unknown date, one
unassociated funerary object was
removed from an unknown location in
Tennessee. A Filson catalog record
created between 1940–1941 indicates
this item was removed from a Native
American burial ground. The one
unassociated funerary object is a flint
knife.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Cultural Affiliation
The cultural items in this notice are
connected to one or more identifiable
earlier groups, tribes, peoples, or
cultures. There is a relationship of
shared group identity between the
identifiable earlier groups, tribes,
peoples, or cultures and one or more
Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian
organizations. The following type of
information was used to reasonably
trace the relationship: geographical.
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1299]
Requests for Repatriation
Additional, written requests for
repatriation of the cultural items in this
19:23 Mar 20, 2023
Jkt 259001
Dated: March 15, 2023.
Melanie O’Brien,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2023–05732 Filed 3–20–23; 8:45 am]
Determinations
Pursuant to NAGPRA and its
implementing regulations, and after
consultation with the appropriate
Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations, the Filson Historical
Society has determined that:
• The two cultural items described
above are reasonably believed to have
been placed with or near individual
human remains at the time of death or
later as part of the death rite or
ceremony and are believed, by a
preponderance of the evidence, to have
been removed from a specific burial site
of a Native American individual.
• There is a relationship of shared
group identity that can be reasonably
traced between the cultural items and
The Chickasaw Nation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
notice must be sent to the Responsible
Official identified in ADDRESSES.
Requests for repatriation may be
submitted by any lineal descendant,
Indian Tribe, or Native Hawaiian
organization not identified in this notice
who shows, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that the requestor is a lineal
descendant or a culturally affiliated
Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization.
Repatriation of the cultural items in
this notice to a requestor may occur on
or after April 20, 2023. If competing
requests for repatriation are received,
the Filson Historical Society must
determine the most appropriate
requestor prior to repatriation. Requests
for joint repatriation of the cultural
items are considered a single request
and not competing requests. The Filson
Historical Society is responsible for
sending a copy of this notice to the
Indian Tribe identified in this notice.
Authority: Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act, 25
U.S.C. 3003, and the implementing
regulations, 43 CFR 10.8, 10.10, and
10.14.
Certain Mobile Telephones, Tablet
Computers With Cellular Connectivity,
and Smart Watches With Cellular
Connectivity, Components Thereof,
and Products Containing Same;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation Based
on Settlement and To Review and Take
No Position on an Initial Determination
Granting in Part a Motion for Summary
Determination Concerning the
Economic Prong of the Domestic
Industry Requirement; Termination of
the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has
determined not to review an initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 26) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the investigation on
the basis of settlement and to review
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and take no position on an ID (Order
No. 22) granting in part a motion for
summary determination concerning the
economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement. The investigation
is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin S. Richards, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5453. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on February 24, 2022. 87 FR 10384 (Feb.
24, 2022). The complaint, as filed and
supplemented by Ericsson Inc. of Plano,
TX and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
of Stockholm, Sweden (collectively,
‘‘Ericsson’’), alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain mobile telephones, tablet
computers with cellular connectivity,
and smart watches with cellular
connectivity, components thereof, and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 8,102,805 (‘‘the ’805 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 9,532,355 (‘‘the ’355
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 11,139,872
(‘‘the ’872 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
10,425,817 (‘‘the ’817 patent’’). Id. The
complaint further alleges that a
domestic industry exists. Id. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, CA as
the sole respondent. Id. at 10385. The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations is
participating in the investigation. Id.
On August 22, 2022, Ericsson moved
unopposed for summary determination
that it satisfied the economic prong of
the domestic industry requirement of
section 337 with respect to each of the
four asserted patents based on showings
pursuant to section 337(a)(3)(A) and (B).
On November 15, 2022, the ALJ
issued Order No. 22, which granted
Ericsson’s motion in part. Specifically,
the ID granted summary determination
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 21, 2023 / Notices
that Ericsson satisfied the economic
prong of the domestic industry
requirement for the ’805, ’355, and ’872
patents based on showings under
337(a)(3)(A) and (B). For the ’817 patent,
the ID found that Ericsson satisfied the
economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement based on its
showing under section 337(a)(3)(A)
only. The ID found that a genuine issue
of material fact precluded granting
summary determination as to the ’817
patent based on Ericsson’s showing
under section 337(a)(3)(B). No petitions
for review of Order No. 22 were filed.
Thereafter, the Commission extended
the time to determine whether to review
Order No. 22 to March 16, 2023.
On February 24, 2023, the ALJ issued
Order No. 26, which granted the parties’
joint motion to terminate this
investigation in its entirety on the basis
of settlement between the parties. The
ID found that the motion complied with
the applicable Commission rules. See 19
CFR 210.21(b)(1). The ID also found that
termination of the investigation based
on settlement is not contrary to the
public interest. No petitions for review
of Order No. 26 were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review Order No. 26 and to review
and take no position on Order No. 22.
This investigation is terminated in its
entirety.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on March 15,
2023.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 15, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[USITC SE–23–017]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Sunshine Act Meetings
United
States International Trade Commission.
TIME AND DATE: March 30, 2023 at 9:00
a.m.
PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
(202) 205–2000.
STATUS: Open to the public.
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
19:23 Mar 20, 2023
1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Commission vote on Inv. No. 731–
TA–663 (Fifth Review) (Paper Clips
from China). The Commission currently
is scheduled to complete and file its
determinations and views of the
Commission on April 11, 2023.
5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Sharon Bellamy, Acting Supervisory
Hearings and Information Officer, 202–
205–2000.
The Commission is holding the
meeting under the Government in the
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In
accordance with Commission policy,
subject matter listed above, not disposed
of at the scheduled meeting, may be
carried over to the agenda of the
following meeting.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 17, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–05844 Filed 3–17–23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1121–0312]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Revision of a
Currently Approved Collection: Survey
of State Criminal History Information
Systems (SSCHIS)
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Office of Justice Programs, Department
of Justice.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs,
Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until May
22, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Devon Adams, Deputy Director, Bureau
of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2023–05746 Filed 3–20–23; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17017
NW, Washington, DC 20531 (email:
devon.adams@usdoj.gov; telephone:
202–305–0765).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Bureau of Justice
Statistics, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently collection
approved collection.
(2) The Title of the Form/Collection:
Survey of State Criminal History
Information Systems (SSCHIS).
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The form number is N/A. The
applicable component within the
Department of Justice is the Bureau of
Justice Statistics, in the Office of Justice
Programs.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Respondents are state government
agencies, primarily state criminal
history record repositories. The SSCHIS
report, the most comprehensive data
available on the collection and
maintenance of information by state
criminal history record systems,
describes the status of such systems and
record repositories on a biennial basis.
Data collected from state record
repositories serves as the basis for
estimating the percentage of total state
records that are immediately available
through the FBI’s Interstate
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17016-17017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-05746]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1299]
Certain Mobile Telephones, Tablet Computers With Cellular
Connectivity, and Smart Watches With Cellular Connectivity, Components
Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on
Settlement and To Review and Take No Position on an Initial
Determination Granting in Part a Motion for Summary Determination
Concerning the Economic Prong of the Domestic Industry Requirement;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission (``Commission'') has determined not to review an initial
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 26) of the presiding administrative
law judge (``ALJ'') terminating the investigation on the basis of
settlement and to review and take no position on an ID (Order No. 22)
granting in part a motion for summary determination concerning the
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The investigation
is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin S. Richards, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5453. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on February 24, 2022. 87 FR 10384 (Feb. 24, 2022). The complaint, as
filed and supplemented by Ericsson Inc. of Plano, TX and
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of Stockholm, Sweden (collectively,
``Ericsson''), alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States
after importation of certain mobile telephones, tablet computers with
cellular connectivity, and smart watches with cellular connectivity,
components thereof, and products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,102,805 (``the '805
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,532,355 (``the '355 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 11,139,872 (``the '872 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 10,425,817
(``the '817 patent''). Id. The complaint further alleges that a
domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission's notice of investigation
named Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, CA as the sole respondent. Id. at
10385. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is participating in
the investigation. Id.
On August 22, 2022, Ericsson moved unopposed for summary
determination that it satisfied the economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement of section 337 with respect to each of the four
asserted patents based on showings pursuant to section 337(a)(3)(A) and
(B).
On November 15, 2022, the ALJ issued Order No. 22, which granted
Ericsson's motion in part. Specifically, the ID granted summary
determination
[[Page 17017]]
that Ericsson satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry
requirement for the '805, '355, and '872 patents based on showings
under 337(a)(3)(A) and (B). For the '817 patent, the ID found that
Ericsson satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry
requirement based on its showing under section 337(a)(3)(A) only. The
ID found that a genuine issue of material fact precluded granting
summary determination as to the '817 patent based on Ericsson's showing
under section 337(a)(3)(B). No petitions for review of Order No. 22
were filed. Thereafter, the Commission extended the time to determine
whether to review Order No. 22 to March 16, 2023.
On February 24, 2023, the ALJ issued Order No. 26, which granted
the parties' joint motion to terminate this investigation in its
entirety on the basis of settlement between the parties. The ID found
that the motion complied with the applicable Commission rules. See 19
CFR 210.21(b)(1). The ID also found that termination of the
investigation based on settlement is not contrary to the public
interest. No petitions for review of Order No. 26 were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review Order No. 26 and to
review and take no position on Order No. 22. This investigation is
terminated in its entirety.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on March 15,
2023.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 15, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-05746 Filed 3-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P