Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 15660-15663 [2023-05210]

Download as PDF 15660 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 2023 / Notices entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant ‘‘gap’’ period of the order (i.e., the period following the expiry of provisional measures and before definitive measures were put into place), if such a gap period is applicable to the POR. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Administrative Protective Orders and Letters of Appearance Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with the procedures outlined in Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures apply to administrative reviews included in this notice of initiation. Parties wishing to participate in any of these administrative reviews should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of separate letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). Factual Information Requirements Commerce’s regulations identify five categories of factual information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are summarized as follows: (i) evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other than factual information described in (i)–(iv). These regulations require any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also provide specific time limits for such factual submissions based on the type of factual information being submitted. Please review the Final Rule,12 available at www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR2013-07-17/pdf/2013-17045.pdf, prior to submitting factual information in this segment. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its 12 See Certification of Factual Information To Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also the frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:09 Mar 13, 2023 Jkt 259001 requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.13 Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information using the formats provided at the end of the Final Rule.14 Commerce intends to reject factual submissions in any proceeding segments if the submitting party does not comply with applicable certification requirements. Extension of Time Limits Regulation Parties may request an extension of time limits before a time limit established under Part 351 expires, or as otherwise specified by Commerce.15 In general, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after the time limit established under Part 351 expires. For submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) case and rebuttal briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments concerning the selection of a surrogate country and surrogate values and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning CBP data; and (5) Q&V questionnaires. Under certain circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, Commerce will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. This policy also requires that an extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission, and clarifies the circumstances under which Commerce will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension of time limits. Please review the Final Rule, available at https:// www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ 13 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 14 See section 782(b) of the Act; see also Final Rule; and the frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_ final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 15 See 19 CFR 351.302. PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 html/2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: March 9, 2023. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2023–05199 Filed 3–13–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–557–816] Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending its final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel nails (nails) from Malaysia for the period July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, to correct certain ministerial errors. DATES: Applicable March 14, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Emily Bradshaw, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–3896. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On February 8, 2023, Commerce published the final results of the 2020– 2021 administrative review of nails from Malaysia.1 On February 8, 2023, Commerce received a timely filed allegation from Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. (the petitioner) with regard to the calculation of the final dumping margin for respondent Region International Co., Ltd. and Region System Sdn. Bhd (collectively, Region).2 Also on February 8, 2023, Commerce 1 See Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 8257 (February 8, 2023) (Final Results) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM). 2 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Ministerial Error Comments,’’ dated February 8, 2023 (Petitioner Ministerial Allegation Letter). E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 2023 / Notices received a timely filed allegation from Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd (collectively, Inmax) that Commerce made ministerial errors in the Final Results with regard to its calculation of the final dumping margin for Inmax.3 Based on our analysis of these allegations, we determine that we made ministerial errors, and we have made changes to the calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin for Region, Inmax, and for the non-selected respondents.4 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is certain steel nails having a nominal shaft length not exceeding 12 inches.5 Certain steel nails include, but are not limited to, nails made from round wire and nails that are cut from flat-rolled steel. Certain steel nails may be of one piece construction or constructed of two or more pieces. Certain steel nails may be produced from any type of steel, and may have any type of surface finish, head type, shank, point type and shaft diameter. Finishes include, but are not limited to, coating in vinyl, zinc (galvanized, including but not limited to electroplating or hot dipping one or more times), phosphate, cement, and paint. Certain steel nails may have one or more surface finishes. Head styles include, but are not limited to, flat, projection, cupped, oval, brad, headless, double, countersunk, and sinker. Shank styles include, but are not limited to, smooth, barbed, screw threaded, ring shank and fluted. Screw-threaded nails subject to this proceeding are driven using direct force and not by turning the nail using a tool that engages with the head. Point styles include, but are not limited to, diamond, needle, chisel and blunt or no point. Certain steel nails may be sold in bulk, or they may be collated in any manner using any material. Excluded from the scope of this order are certain steel nails packaged in combination with one or more nonsubject articles, if the total number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless of size, is less than 25. If packaged in combination with one or more non3 See Inmax’s Letter, ‘‘Ministerial Error Comments,’’ dated February 8, 2023 (Inmax Ministerial Allegation Letter). 4 See Memorandum ‘‘Ministerial Error Memorandum for the Amended Final. Results of the 2020–2021 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum). 5 The shaft length of certain steel nails with flat heads or parallel shoulders under the head shall be measured from under the head or shoulder to the tip of the point. The shaft length of all other certain steel nails shall be measured overall. VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:09 Mar 13, 2023 Jkt 259001 subject articles, certain steel nails remain subject merchandise if the total number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless of size, is equal to or greater than 25, unless otherwise excluded based on the other exclusions below. Also excluded from the scope are certain steel nails with a nominal shaft length of one inch or less that are (a) a component of an unassembled article, (b) the total number of nails is sixty (60) or less, and (c) the imported unassembled article falls into one of the following eight groupings: (1) builders’ joinery and carpentry of wood that are classifiable as windows, Frenchwindows and their frames; (2) builders’ joinery and carpentry of wood that are classifiable as doors and their frames and thresholds; (3) swivel seats with variable height adjustment; (4) seats that are convertible into beds (with the exception of those classifiable as garden seats or camping equipment); (5) seats of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials; (6) other seats with wooden frames (with the exception of seats of a kind used for aircraft or motor vehicles); (7) furniture (other than seats) of wood (with the exception of (i) medical, surgical, dental or veterinary furniture; and (ii) barbers’ chairs and similar chairs, having rotating as well as both reclining and elevating movements); or (8) furniture (other than seats) of materials other than wood, metal, or plastics (e.g., furniture of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials). The aforementioned imported unassembled articles are currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 4418.10, 4418.20, 9401.30, 9401.40, 9401.51, 9401.59, 9401.61, 9401.69, 9403.30, 9403.40, 9403.50, 9403.60, 9403.81 or 9403.89. Also excluded from the scope of this order are steel nails that meet the specifications of Type I, Style 20 nails as identified in Tables 29 through 33 of ASTM Standard F1667 (2013 revision). Also excluded from the scope of this order are nails suitable for use in powder-actuated hand tools, whether or not threaded, which are currently classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.20.00 and 7317.00.30.00. Also excluded from the scope of this order are nails having a case hardness greater than or equal to 50 on the Rockwell Hardness C scale (HRC), a carbon content greater than or equal to 0.5 percent, a round head, a secondary reduced-diameter raised head section, a centered shank, and a smooth symmetrical point, suitable for use in gas-actuated hand tools. Also excluded from the scope of this order are corrugated nails. A corrugated PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15661 nail is made up of a small strip of corrugated steel with sharp points on one side. Also excluded from the scope of this order are thumb tacks, which are currently classified under HTSUS subheading 7317.00.10.00. Certain steel nails subject to this order are currently classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40, 7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain steel nails subject to this order also may be classified under HTSUS subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 7806.00.80.00, 7318.29.00.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS subheadings. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Ministerial Error Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.’’ The petitioner argues that Commerce mistakenly excluded certain cost records when implementing the use of quarterly costs.6 Specifically, the petitioner states that Commerce inadvertently excluded cost records for one quarter when calculating average costs for the purpose of examining cost recovery.7 We have examined the programming language contained in the ‘‘ME Macros’’ SAS program, and we agree with the petitioner.8 Inmax argues that Commerce mistakenly used the incorrect variables for total cost of manufacturing, general and administrative expenses, and interest expenses. We agree with Inmax, and therefore, we have corrected the error.9 6 See Petitioner Ministerial Allegation Letter. 7 Id. 8 See Ministerial Error Allegation Memorandum at 2–3. 9 Id. E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1 15662 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 2023 / Notices Furthermore, consistent with Commerce’s practice,10 the rate for the respondents not selected for individual examination will be the weightedaverage dumping margin for Region, as the margin calculated for Region is the only rate calculated that is not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Amended Final Results of Review Commerce determines that the following amended weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2021: Estimated weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Producer/exporter Region International Co., Ltd./Region System Sdn. Bhd ............................... Inmax Sdn. Bhd./Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd .................................................... Non-Selected Respondents 11 ............... 1.66 0.00 1.66 Disclosure We will disclose the calculation memoranda used in our analysis to parties to this segment of the proceeding within five days of the date of the publication of these amended final results, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b). ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Assessment Rate Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.12 For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the amended final results of this administrative review, if any importerspecific assessment rates calculated in the amended final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), Commerce will issue instructions 10 See, e.g., Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Final Successor-in-Interest Determination; 2018–2019, 86 FR 30915 (June 10, 2021) and accompanying IDM at Comment 4. 11 See Appendix for the list of non-selected respondents. 12 In these amended final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:09 Mar 13, 2023 Jkt 259001 directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries. To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the amount of dumping calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to that importer (or customer). Where an importer (or customer)specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we will apply the assessment rate to the entered value of the importer’s/customer’s entries during the POR. For the companies identified above that were not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries at the rates established in these amended final results of review. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by any of these companies for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.13 Consistent with its recent notice,14 Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the amended final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the period of review. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or 13 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 14 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 15, 2021). PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 countervailing duties did occur and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: March 8, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I—List of Non-Selected Respondents Airlift Trans Oceanic Pvt. Ltd. Alsons Manufacturing India, LLP. Atlantic Marine Group Ltd. Bluemoon Logistics Pvt. Ltd. C.H. Robinson Worldwide Freight India Pvt., Ltd. Chia Pao Metal Co., Ltd. Chuan Heng Hardware Paints and Building Materials Sdn. Bhd. Come Best (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Dahnay Logistics Pvt., Ltd. Gbo Fastening Systems AB. Honour Lane Logistics Sdn., Bhd. Honour Lane Shipping Ltd. Impress Steel Wire Industries Sdn., Bhd. Kerry-Apex (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Kerry Indev Logistics Pvt., Ltd. Kerry Logistics (M) Sdn., Bhd. Kimmu Trading Sdn., Bhd. Modern Factory for Steel Industries Co., Ltd. Oman Fasteners LLC. Orient Containers Sdn., Bhd. Orient Express Container Co., Ltd. RM Wire Industries Sdn. Bhd. Royal Logistics. SAR Transport Systems Pvt., Ltd. Soon Shing Building Materials Sdn., Bhd. Storeit Services LLP. Tag Fasteners Sdn., Bhd. Tag Staples Sdn., Bhd. Tampin Sin Yong Wai Industry Sdn., Bhd. Teamglobal Logistics Pvt., Ltd. Top Remac Industries. UD Industries Sdn., Bhd. Vien Group Sdn., Bhd. Watasan Industries Sdn., Bhd. E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 2023 / Notices WWL India Private Ltd. Scope of the Order 3 [FR Doc. 2023–05210 Filed 3–13–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–016] Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020–2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the exporters of passenger vehicle and light truck tires (passenger tires) from the People’s Republic of China (China) listed in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section below, sold subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), August 1, 2020, through July 31, 2021. Further, we also determine that certain companies under review had no shipments to the United States during the POR. DATES: Applicable March 14, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page or Peter Shaw, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1938 or (202) 482–0697, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Background On September 8, 2022, we published the Preliminary Results and invited interested parties to comment.1 We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. For details regarding the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 1 See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Rescission, in Part; and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020– 2021, 87 FR 54970 (September 8, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of China and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020–2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (IDM). VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:09 Mar 13, 2023 15663 Jkt 259001 Tyre (Hong Kong) Limited; (3) Qingdao Nama Industrial Co., Ltd.; (4) Shandong The products covered by this Order Changfeng Tyres Co., Ltd.; (5) Shandong are certain passenger vehicle and light Duratti Rubber Corporation Co., Ltd.; (6) truck tires from China. For a full Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., Ltd.; (7) description of the scope of the Order, Shandong Yongsheng Rubber Group see the Issues and Decision Co., Ltd.; (8) Tyrechamp Group Co., Memorandum. Limited (Tyrechamp); (9) Wendeng Analysis of Comments Received Sanfeng Tyre Co., Ltd.; and (10) Zhaoqing Junhong Co., Ltd. did not have All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties shipments of subject merchandise are addressed in the Issues and Decision during the POR.6 No party commented on this preliminary finding for any Memorandum. A list of the issues company except Tyrechamp. discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice As noted above, we preliminarily as an appendix. The Issues and Decision found that Tyrechamp did not have any Memorandum is a public document and shipments of subject merchandise is on file electronically via Enforcement during the POR. Although the and Compliance’s Antidumping and petitioner 7 argued in its case brief Countervailing Duty Centralized against our preliminary finding of no Electronic Service System (ACCESS). shipments for Tyrechamp, we received ACCESS is available to registered users no information to contradict our at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a preliminary determination, thus, we complete version of the Issues and continue to find that Tyrechamp made Decision Memorandum can be accessed no shipments of subject merchandise to directly https://access.trade.gov/public/ the United States during the POR.8 FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Therefore, for the final results of review, Changes Since the Preliminary Results we continue to find that these companies did not have any shipments Based on our analysis of the of subject merchandise during the POR. comments received from interested parties and for the reasons explained in Separate Rates the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we made certain changes in the We made no changes to our calculation of Giti’s and Sumitomo’s 4 preliminary separate rate findings. weighted-average dumping margins. Thus, we continue to find that that the These include changes to the valuation evidence provided by the two of certain inputs, correction of certain mandatory respondents as well as errors alleged by parties in their case respondents: (1) Anhui Jichi Tire Co., and rebuttal briefs, changes related to Ltd.; (2) Crown International minor corrections raised at on-site Corporation; (3) Hankook Tire China verification for Giti, and the use of a Co., Ltd.; (4) Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., revised factors of production database Ltd.; (5) Koryo International Industrial for Sumitomo. For a discussion of these Limited; (6) Nankang (Zhangjiagang changes, see the Issues and Decision Free Trade Zone) Rubber Industrial Co., Memorandum.5 Ltd.; (7) Qingdao Sentury Tire Co., Ltd; 14 (8) Qingdao Sunfulcess Tyre Co., Final Determination of No Shipments Ltd.; (9) Qingdao Transamerica Tire In the Preliminary Results, we found Industrial Co., Ltd.; (10) Shandong that: (1) Hongtyre Group Co.; (2) Mayrun Haohua Tire Co., Ltd.; (11) Shandong Hengyu Science & Technology Co., Ltd.; 3 See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck (12) Shandong New Continent Tire Co., Tires from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Ltd.; (13) Shandong Province Sanli Tire Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; and Manufactured Co., Ltd.; (14) Shandong Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Wanda Boto Tyre Co., Ltd.; and (15) Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 80 Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd. supported FR 47902 (August 10, 2015) (Order). 4 Giti refers to a single entity, which includes Giti finding an absence of both de jure and Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd. (GTT); Giti Radial de facto government control, and, (Anhui) Tire Company Ltd., and Giti Tire Fujian Company Ltd., Giti Tire (Hualin) Company, Ltd., Giti Tire Greatwall Company. Ltd., Giti Tire (Anhui) Company, Giti Tire (Yinchuan) Company Ltd., and Giti Tire (Chongqing) Company Ltd. Sumitomo refers to a single entity, which includes Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd.; Sumitomo Rubber (Changshu) Co., Ltd.; and Sumitomo Rubber Industries Co., Ltd. (collectively, Sumitomo). See Preliminary Results PDM at 2. 5 See IDM at ‘‘Changes Since the Preliminary Results.’’ PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6 See Preliminary Results, 87 FR at 54970–71 and Preliminary Results PDM at ‘‘Preliminary Determination of No Shipments.’’ 7 The petitioner is the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL–CIO, CLC. 8 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 18 for a more detailed discussion of this issue. E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15660-15663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-05210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-557-816]


Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Amended Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending its 
final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on certain steel nails (nails) from Malaysia for the period July 
1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, to correct certain ministerial errors.

DATES: Applicable March 14, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Emily Bradshaw, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0195 or (202) 482-3896.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On February 8, 2023, Commerce published the final results of the 
2020-2021 administrative review of nails from Malaysia.\1\ On February 
8, 2023, Commerce received a timely filed allegation from Mid Continent 
Steel & Wire, Inc. (the petitioner) with regard to the calculation of 
the final dumping margin for respondent Region International Co., Ltd. 
and Region System Sdn. Bhd (collectively, Region).\2\ Also on February 
8, 2023, Commerce

[[Page 15661]]

received a timely filed allegation from Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax 
Industries Sdn. Bhd (collectively, Inmax) that Commerce made 
ministerial errors in the Final Results with regard to its calculation 
of the final dumping margin for Inmax.\3\ Based on our analysis of 
these allegations, we determine that we made ministerial errors, and we 
have made changes to the calculation of the weighted-average dumping 
margin for Region, Inmax, and for the non-selected respondents.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 8257 
(February 8, 2023) (Final Results) and accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum (IDM).
    \2\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Ministerial Error Comments,'' 
dated February 8, 2023 (Petitioner Ministerial Allegation Letter).
    \3\ See Inmax's Letter, ``Ministerial Error Comments,'' dated 
February 8, 2023 (Inmax Ministerial Allegation Letter).
    \4\ See Memorandum ``Ministerial Error Memorandum for the 
Amended Final. Results of the 2020-2021 Administrative Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia,'' dated 
concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is certain steel nails having 
a nominal shaft length not exceeding 12 inches.\5\ Certain steel nails 
include, but are not limited to, nails made from round wire and nails 
that are cut from flat-rolled steel. Certain steel nails may be of one 
piece construction or constructed of two or more pieces. Certain steel 
nails may be produced from any type of steel, and may have any type of 
surface finish, head type, shank, point type and shaft diameter. 
Finishes include, but are not limited to, coating in vinyl, zinc 
(galvanized, including but not limited to electroplating or hot dipping 
one or more times), phosphate, cement, and paint. Certain steel nails 
may have one or more surface finishes. Head styles include, but are not 
limited to, flat, projection, cupped, oval, brad, headless, double, 
countersunk, and sinker. Shank styles include, but are not limited to, 
smooth, barbed, screw threaded, ring shank and fluted. Screw-threaded 
nails subject to this proceeding are driven using direct force and not 
by turning the nail using a tool that engages with the head. Point 
styles include, but are not limited to, diamond, needle, chisel and 
blunt or no point. Certain steel nails may be sold in bulk, or they may 
be collated in any manner using any material.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The shaft length of certain steel nails with flat heads or 
parallel shoulders under the head shall be measured from under the 
head or shoulder to the tip of the point. The shaft length of all 
other certain steel nails shall be measured overall.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Excluded from the scope of this order are certain steel nails 
packaged in combination with one or more non-subject articles, if the 
total number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless of size, is 
less than 25. If packaged in combination with one or more non-subject 
articles, certain steel nails remain subject merchandise if the total 
number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless of size, is equal 
to or greater than 25, unless otherwise excluded based on the other 
exclusions below.
    Also excluded from the scope are certain steel nails with a nominal 
shaft length of one inch or less that are (a) a component of an 
unassembled article, (b) the total number of nails is sixty (60) or 
less, and (c) the imported unassembled article falls into one of the 
following eight groupings: (1) builders' joinery and carpentry of wood 
that are classifiable as windows, French-windows and their frames; (2) 
builders' joinery and carpentry of wood that are classifiable as doors 
and their frames and thresholds; (3) swivel seats with variable height 
adjustment; (4) seats that are convertible into beds (with the 
exception of those classifiable as garden seats or camping equipment); 
(5) seats of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials; (6) other seats 
with wooden frames (with the exception of seats of a kind used for 
aircraft or motor vehicles); (7) furniture (other than seats) of wood 
(with the exception of (i) medical, surgical, dental or veterinary 
furniture; and (ii) barbers' chairs and similar chairs, having rotating 
as well as both reclining and elevating movements); or (8) furniture 
(other than seats) of materials other than wood, metal, or plastics 
(e.g., furniture of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials). The 
aforementioned imported unassembled articles are currently classified 
under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings: 4418.10, 4418.20, 9401.30, 9401.40, 9401.51, 
9401.59, 9401.61, 9401.69, 9403.30, 9403.40, 9403.50, 9403.60, 9403.81 
or 9403.89.
    Also excluded from the scope of this order are steel nails that 
meet the specifications of Type I, Style 20 nails as identified in 
Tables 29 through 33 of ASTM Standard F1667 (2013 revision).
    Also excluded from the scope of this order are nails suitable for 
use in powder-actuated hand tools, whether or not threaded, which are 
currently classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.20.00 and 
7317.00.30.00.
    Also excluded from the scope of this order are nails having a case 
hardness greater than or equal to 50 on the Rockwell Hardness C scale 
(HRC), a carbon content greater than or equal to 0.5 percent, a round 
head, a secondary reduced-diameter raised head section, a centered 
shank, and a smooth symmetrical point, suitable for use in gas-actuated 
hand tools.
    Also excluded from the scope of this order are corrugated nails. A 
corrugated nail is made up of a small strip of corrugated steel with 
sharp points on one side.
    Also excluded from the scope of this order are thumb tacks, which 
are currently classified under HTSUS subheading 7317.00.10.00.
    Certain steel nails subject to this order are currently classified 
under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05, 
7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 
7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40, 
7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80, 
7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain 
steel nails subject to this order also may be classified under HTSUS 
subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 7806.00.80.00, 7318.29.00.00, 8206.00.00.00 
or other HTSUS subheadings.
    While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is 
dispositive.

Ministerial Error

    Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 
19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ``ministerial error'' as an error ``in 
addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error 
resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any 
other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers 
ministerial.''
    The petitioner argues that Commerce mistakenly excluded certain 
cost records when implementing the use of quarterly costs.\6\ 
Specifically, the petitioner states that Commerce inadvertently 
excluded cost records for one quarter when calculating average costs 
for the purpose of examining cost recovery.\7\ We have examined the 
programming language contained in the ``ME Macros'' SAS program, and we 
agree with the petitioner.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Petitioner Ministerial Allegation Letter.
    \7\ Id.
    \8\ See Ministerial Error Allegation Memorandum at 2-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Inmax argues that Commerce mistakenly used the incorrect variables 
for total cost of manufacturing, general and administrative expenses, 
and interest expenses. We agree with Inmax, and therefore, we have 
corrected the error.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 15662]]

    Furthermore, consistent with Commerce's practice,\10\ the rate for 
the respondents not selected for individual examination will be the 
weighted-average dumping margin for Region, as the margin calculated 
for Region is the only rate calculated that is not zero, de minimis, or 
determined entirely on the basis of facts available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See, e.g., Large Power Transformers from the Republic of 
Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
Final Determination of No Shipments, and Final Successor-in-Interest 
Determination; 2018-2019, 86 FR 30915 (June 10, 2021) and 
accompanying IDM at Comment 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of Review

    Commerce determines that the following amended weighted-average 
dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2010, through June 30, 
2021:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Estimated
                                                               weighted-
                                                                average
                      Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Region International Co., Ltd./Region System Sdn. Bhd.......        1.66
Inmax Sdn. Bhd./Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd...................        0.00
Non-Selected Respondents \11\...............................        1.66
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Appendix for the list of non-selected respondents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We will disclose the calculation memoranda used in our analysis to 
parties to this segment of the proceeding within five days of the date 
of the publication of these amended final results, pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.224(b).

Assessment Rate

    Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\12\ 
For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average 
dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer-specific ad 
valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of 
dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total 
entered value of those same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the amended final results of this 
administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates 
calculated in the amended final results are above de minimis (i.e., at 
or above 0.5 percent), Commerce will issue instructions directly to CBP 
to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ In these amended final results, Commerce applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period 
were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem 
rates by aggregating the amount of dumping calculated for all U.S. 
sales to that importer or customer and dividing this amount by the 
total entered value of the sales to that importer (or customer). Where 
an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is greater than de 
minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we 
will apply the assessment rate to the entered value of the importer's/
customer's entries during the POR. For the companies identified above 
that were not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP 
to liquidate entries at the rates established in these amended final 
results of review.
    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by any 
of these companies for which it did not know its merchandise was 
destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such 
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with its recent notice,\14\ Commerce intends to issue 
appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP no earlier than 35 
days after the date of publication of the amended final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 
15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the period of review. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties did occur and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping 
duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: March 8, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I--List of Non-Selected Respondents

Airlift Trans Oceanic Pvt. Ltd.
Alsons Manufacturing India, LLP.
Atlantic Marine Group Ltd.
Bluemoon Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Freight India Pvt., Ltd.
Chia Pao Metal Co., Ltd.
Chuan Heng Hardware Paints and Building Materials Sdn. Bhd.
Come Best (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
Dahnay Logistics Pvt., Ltd.
Gbo Fastening Systems AB.
Honour Lane Logistics Sdn., Bhd.
Honour Lane Shipping Ltd.
Impress Steel Wire Industries Sdn., Bhd.
Kerry-Apex (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
Kerry Indev Logistics Pvt., Ltd.
Kerry Logistics (M) Sdn., Bhd.
Kimmu Trading Sdn., Bhd.
Modern Factory for Steel Industries Co., Ltd.
Oman Fasteners LLC.
Orient Containers Sdn., Bhd.
Orient Express Container Co., Ltd.
RM Wire Industries Sdn. Bhd.
Royal Logistics.
SAR Transport Systems Pvt., Ltd.
Soon Shing Building Materials Sdn., Bhd.
Storeit Services LLP.
Tag Fasteners Sdn., Bhd.
Tag Staples Sdn., Bhd.
Tampin Sin Yong Wai Industry Sdn., Bhd.
Teamglobal Logistics Pvt., Ltd.
Top Remac Industries.
UD Industries Sdn., Bhd.
Vien Group Sdn., Bhd.
Watasan Industries Sdn., Bhd.

[[Page 15663]]

WWL India Private Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2023-05210 Filed 3-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.