Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020, 14605-14606 [2023-04851]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2023 / Notices
Dated: February 28, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Review
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review
VI. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
VII. Single Entity Treatment
VIII. Discussion of the Methodology
IX. Currency Conversion
X. Recommendation
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Appendix II
Companies/Company Groupings for Which
the Administrative Review Is Being
Rescinded
1. Anji Dasol Solar Energy Science &
Technology Co., Ltd.
2. BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd.
3. Canadian Solar International Limited.
4. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu)
Inc.
5. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang)
Inc.
6. Chint Energy (Haining) Co., Ltd.; Chint
Solar (Hong Kong) Company Limited;
Chint Solar (Jiuquan) Co., Ltd.; Chint
Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; Chint New
Energy Technology (Haining) Co. Ltd.
7. CSI Cells Co., Ltd.
8. CSI Solar Power (China) Inc.
9. CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing (Yancheng)
Co., Ltd.
10. De-Tech Trading Limited HK.
11. Hefei JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
12. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co.
Ltd.
13. JA Solar Co., Ltd.
14. JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd.
15. Jiangsu Jinko Tiansheng Solar Co., Ltd.
16. Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
17. Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd.
18. JingAo Solar Co., Ltd.
19. Jinko Solar Co. Ltd.
20. Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd.
21. Jinko Solar International Limited.
22. JinkoSolar Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd.
23. Jiujiang Shengchao Xinye Technology
Co., Ltd.
24. Jiujiang Shengzhao Xinye Trade Co., Ltd.
25. Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd.
26. Longi (HK) Trading Ltd.
27. Longi Solar Technology Co. Ltd.; Lerri
Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
28. Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
29. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd.
30. Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance
Co., Ltd.
31. Perlight Solar Co., Ltd.
32. Renesola Jiangsu Ltd.
33. ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd.
34. Risen (Luoyang) New Energy Co., Ltd.
35. Risen (Wuhai) New Energy Co., Ltd.
36. Risen Energy Co. Ltd.; Risen Energy
(Changzhou) Co., Ltd.
37. Ruichang Branch, Risen Energy
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Mar 08, 2023
Jkt 259001
(HongKong) Co., Ltd.
38. Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd.
39. Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd.
40. Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd.
41. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources
Co., Ltd.; Baoding Jiasheng
PhotovoltaicTechnology Co., Ltd.;
Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; Beijing Tianneng
Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.;
Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources
Co., Ltd.; Hengshui Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; Lixian Yingli New
Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin
Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.;
Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited.
42. Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd.
43. Sunny Apex Development Ltd.
44. Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
45. Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd.
46. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
47. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
48. Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd.
49. Xiamen Yiyusheng Solar Co., Ltd.
50. Yingli Green Energy International
Trading Company Limited.
51. Yuhuan Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
52. Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology
Co., Ltd.
53. Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
54. Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic Technology
Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2023–04854 Filed 3–8–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–469–818]
Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
certain exporters/producers of ripe
olives from Spain received
countervailable subsidies during the
period of review (POR) January 1, 2020,
through December 31, 2020.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable March 9, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Kolberg or Theodore Pearson, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1785 or (202) 482–2631,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14605
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary
Results on September 6, 2022.1 On
November 7, 2022, we released the final
verification reports,2 and, on November
14, 2022, we invited parties to comment
on the Preliminary Results.3 For a
complete description of the events that
occurred since the Preliminary Results,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.4 On December 15, 2022,
in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), Commerce extended the
deadline for issuing the final results
until March 3, 2023.5
Scope of the Order 6
The products covered by the Order
are ripe olives. A full description of the
scope of the Order is contained in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the interested
parties in their case and rebuttal briefs
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of these issues is
provided in the appendix to this notice.
The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and CVD
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the
Act, in September 2022, Commerce
verified the subsidy information
reported by Agro Sevilla Aceitunas
1 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review;
2020, 87 FR 54460 (September 6, 2022) (Preliminary
Results).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the
Questionnaire Responses of Agro Sevilla Aceitunas
S.Coop. And.,’’ dated November {7}, 2022; see also
Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire
Responses of Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L.
and Its Suppliers,’’ dated November {7}, 2022.
3 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Briefing Schedule,’’
dated November 14, 2022.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Ripe
Olives from Spain,’’ concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review 2020,’’ dated December 15,
2022.
6 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 37469 (August 1,
2018) (Order).
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
14606
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2023 / Notices
S.Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), Angel
Camacho Alimentacio´n, S.L. (Camacho)
and certain suppliers to both
companies. We used standard
verification procedures, including an
examination of relevant accounting and
production records, and original source
documents provided by Agro Sevilla,
Camacho, and their suppliers.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on comments received from
interested parties and issues originating
from verification, we revised the
calculation of the net countervailable
subsidy rates for Agro Sevilla and
Camacho. For a discussion of the issues,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act of
1930. For each of the subsidy programs
found countervailable, we find that
there is a subsidy, i.e., a governmentprovided financial contribution that
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.7 For a
full description of the methodology
underlying all of Commerce’s
conclusions, including our reliance, in
part, on facts otherwise available,
including adverse facts available (AFA),
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of
the Act, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Non-Selected Companies’ Rate
We made no changes to the
methodology for determining a rate for
companies not selected for individual
examination from the Preliminary
Results. However, due to changes in
calculations for Agro Sevilla and
Camacho, the non-selected rate changed
for each of the three non-selected
companies for which a review was
requested and not rescinded. For these
companies, we are applying an ad
valorem subsidy rate of 8.50 percent.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
We find the following net
countervailable subsidy rates for the
POR January 1, 2020, through December
31, 2020:
Producer/exporter
Subsidy rate
(percent
ad valorem)
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop.
And ........................................
8.83
7 See
sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Mar 08, 2023
Jkt 259001
Subsidy rate
(percent
ad valorem)
Producer/exporter
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Administrative Protective Order
Angel Camacho Alimentacio´n,
S.L. and its cross-owned affiliates 8 ..................................
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable
their responsibility concerning the
to the Following Companies 9
disposition of proprietary information
Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L .....
8.50 disclosed under APO in accordance
Alimentary Group Dcoop
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
S.Coop. And ..........................
8.50 written notification of the return or
Aceitunas Torrent, S.L ..............
8.50 destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order,
Disclosure
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
We intend to disclose calculations
APO is a sanctionable violation.
and analysis performed for these final
results of review within five days after
Notification to Interested Parties
the date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register in accordance with
The final results are issued and
19 CFR 351.224(b).
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
Assessment Requirements
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
In accordance with section
Dated: March 3, 2023.
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall
Lisa W. Wang,
determine, and CBP shall assess,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
countervailing duties on all appropriate Compliance.
entries covered by this review.
Appendix
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
days after publication of the final results Decision Memorandum
of this review in the Federal Register.
I. Summary
If a timely summons is filed at the U.S.
II. Background
Court of International Trade, the
III. Scope of the Order
assessment instructions will direct CBP
IV. Subsidies Valuation
not to liquidate relevant entries until the V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
time for parties to file a request for a
Adverse Inferences
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
VI. Non-Selected Rate
within 90 days of publication).
VII. Analysis of Programs
8.08
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1)
of the Act, we also intend to instruct
CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties in the
amounts shown above for the abovelisted companies with regard to
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of these final results of
review. For all non-reviewed firms, CBP
will continue to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at the
all-others rate or the most recent
company-specific rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
8 Commerce found the following companies to be
cross-owned with Angel Camacho Alimentacio´n,
S.L.: Grupo Angel Camacho, S.L., Cuarterola S.L.,
and Cucanoche S.L.
9 This rate is based on the rates for the
respondents that were selected for individual
review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis,
or based entirely on facts available. See section
705(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
VIII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Commerce’s
Substantial Dependence Finding is
Lawful and Supported by Substantial
Evidence
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should
Apply AFA to All of Camacho’s Growers
Because Two Growers Failed
Verification
Comment 3: Whether Agro Sevilla’s NonResponsive Growers Should Receive an
AFA Rate Because They Are Affiliated
with Agro Sevilla
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should
Include Two of Camacho’s Suppliers in
the BPS Program Calculation Since They
Were Primarily Suppliers and Only Grew
a Small Portion of Their Olives
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should
Correct a Ministerial Error Regarding
One of Agro Sevilla’s First-Tier
Suppliers
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023–04851 Filed 3–8–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14605-14606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04851]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-469-818]
Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
certain exporters/producers of ripe olives from Spain received
countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR) January 1,
2020, through December 31, 2020.
DATES: Applicable March 9, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg or Theodore Pearson, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1785 or (202) 482-2631,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary Results on September 6, 2022.\1\
On November 7, 2022, we released the final verification reports,\2\
and, on November 14, 2022, we invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results.\3\ For a complete description of the events that
occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\4\ On December 15, 2022, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce
extended the deadline for issuing the final results until March 3,
2023.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020, 87 FR 54460
(September 6, 2022) (Preliminary Results).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Verification of the Questionnaire
Responses of Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop. And.,'' dated November
{7{time} , 2022; see also Memorandum, ``Verification of the
Questionnaire Responses of Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. and Its
Suppliers,'' dated November {7{time} , 2022.
\3\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Briefing Schedule,'' dated November
14, 2022.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Ripe Olives from Spain,'' concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review 2020,'' dated December
15, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Amended Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 83
FR 37469 (August 1, 2018) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the Order are ripe olives. A full
description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the interested parties in their case and
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of these issues is provided in the appendix to this notice. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and CVD
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, in September 2022,
Commerce verified the subsidy information reported by Agro Sevilla
Aceitunas
[[Page 14606]]
S.Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), Angel Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n, S.L.
(Camacho) and certain suppliers to both companies. We used standard
verification procedures, including an examination of relevant
accounting and production records, and original source documents
provided by Agro Sevilla, Camacho, and their suppliers.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on comments received from interested parties and issues
originating from verification, we revised the calculation of the net
countervailable subsidy rates for Agro Sevilla and Camacho. For a
discussion of the issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act of 1930. For each of the subsidy
programs found countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e.,
a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a
benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\7\ For a
full description of the methodology underlying all of Commerce's
conclusions, including our reliance, in part, on facts otherwise
available, including adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant to
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Selected Companies' Rate
We made no changes to the methodology for determining a rate for
companies not selected for individual examination from the Preliminary
Results. However, due to changes in calculations for Agro Sevilla and
Camacho, the non-selected rate changed for each of the three non-
selected companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded.
For these companies, we are applying an ad valorem subsidy rate of 8.50
percent.
Final Results of the Administrative Review
We find the following net countervailable subsidy rates for the POR
January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy
rate
Producer/exporter (percent ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop. And......................... 8.83
Angel Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n, S.L. and its cross-owned 8.08
affiliates \8\............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies \9\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L................................ 8.50
Alimentary Group Dcoop S.Coop. And......................... 8.50
Aceitunas Torrent, S.L..................................... 8.50
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Commerce found the following companies to be cross-owned
with Angel Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n, S.L.: Grupo Angel Camacho,
S.L., Cuarterola S.L., and Cucanoche S.L.
\9\ This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that
were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero,
de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section
705(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to disclose calculations and analysis performed for these
final results of review within five days after the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, we also intend to
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing
duties in the amounts shown above for the above-listed companies with
regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of these
final results of review. For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue
to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-
others rate or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
The final results are issued and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: March 3, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation
V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences
VI. Non-Selected Rate
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Commerce's Substantial Dependence Finding is
Lawful and Supported by Substantial Evidence
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to All of Camacho's
Growers Because Two Growers Failed Verification
Comment 3: Whether Agro Sevilla's Non-Responsive Growers Should
Receive an AFA Rate Because They Are Affiliated with Agro Sevilla
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Include Two of Camacho's
Suppliers in the BPS Program Calculation Since They Were Primarily
Suppliers and Only Grew a Small Portion of Their Olives
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Correct a Ministerial Error
Regarding One of Agro Sevilla's First-Tier Suppliers
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023-04851 Filed 3-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P