Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020, 14605-14606 [2023-04851]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2023 / Notices Dated: February 28, 2023. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Review IV. Scope of the Order V. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review VI. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments VII. Single Entity Treatment VIII. Discussion of the Methodology IX. Currency Conversion X. Recommendation ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Appendix II Companies/Company Groupings for Which the Administrative Review Is Being Rescinded 1. Anji Dasol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd. 2. BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd. 3. Canadian Solar International Limited. 4. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc. 5. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc. 6. Chint Energy (Haining) Co., Ltd.; Chint Solar (Hong Kong) Company Limited; Chint Solar (Jiuquan) Co., Ltd.; Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; Chint New Energy Technology (Haining) Co. Ltd. 7. CSI Cells Co., Ltd. 8. CSI Solar Power (China) Inc. 9. CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing (Yancheng) Co., Ltd. 10. De-Tech Trading Limited HK. 11. Hefei JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 12. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co. Ltd. 13. JA Solar Co., Ltd. 14. JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. 15. Jiangsu Jinko Tiansheng Solar Co., Ltd. 16. Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. 17. Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd. 18. JingAo Solar Co., Ltd. 19. Jinko Solar Co. Ltd. 20. Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. 21. Jinko Solar International Limited. 22. JinkoSolar Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd. 23. Jiujiang Shengchao Xinye Technology Co., Ltd. 24. Jiujiang Shengzhao Xinye Trade Co., Ltd. 25. Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd. 26. Longi (HK) Trading Ltd. 27. Longi Solar Technology Co. Ltd.; Lerri Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 28. Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 29. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd. 30. Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. 31. Perlight Solar Co., Ltd. 32. Renesola Jiangsu Ltd. 33. ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd. 34. Risen (Luoyang) New Energy Co., Ltd. 35. Risen (Wuhai) New Energy Co., Ltd. 36. Risen Energy Co. Ltd.; Risen Energy (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. 37. Ruichang Branch, Risen Energy VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Mar 08, 2023 Jkt 259001 (HongKong) Co., Ltd. 38. Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. 39. Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd. 40. Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd. 41. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Baoding Jiasheng PhotovoltaicTechnology Co., Ltd.; Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited. 42. Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd. 43. Sunny Apex Development Ltd. 44. Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 45. Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd. 46. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 47. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 48. Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd. 49. Xiamen Yiyusheng Solar Co., Ltd. 50. Yingli Green Energy International Trading Company Limited. 51. Yuhuan Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. 52. Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd. 53. Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. 54. Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. [FR Doc. 2023–04854 Filed 3–8–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–469–818] Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain exporters/producers of ripe olives from Spain received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. SUMMARY: DATES: Applicable March 9, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg or Theodore Pearson, AD/ CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1785 or (202) 482–2631, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14605 Background Commerce published the Preliminary Results on September 6, 2022.1 On November 7, 2022, we released the final verification reports,2 and, on November 14, 2022, we invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.3 For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4 On December 15, 2022, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce extended the deadline for issuing the final results until March 3, 2023.5 Scope of the Order 6 The products covered by the Order are ripe olives. A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised by the interested parties in their case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of these issues is provided in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Verification As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, in September 2022, Commerce verified the subsidy information reported by Agro Sevilla Aceitunas 1 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020, 87 FR 54460 (September 6, 2022) (Preliminary Results). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop. And.,’’ dated November {7}, 2022; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. and Its Suppliers,’’ dated November {7}, 2022. 3 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Briefing Schedule,’’ dated November 14, 2022. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Ripe Olives from Spain,’’ concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review 2020,’’ dated December 15, 2022. 6 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 37469 (August 1, 2018) (Order). E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1 14606 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 46 / Thursday, March 9, 2023 / Notices S.Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), Angel Camacho Alimentacio´n, S.L. (Camacho) and certain suppliers to both companies. We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original source documents provided by Agro Sevilla, Camacho, and their suppliers. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on comments received from interested parties and issues originating from verification, we revised the calculation of the net countervailable subsidy rates for Agro Sevilla and Camacho. For a discussion of the issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act of 1930. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a governmentprovided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.7 For a full description of the methodology underlying all of Commerce’s conclusions, including our reliance, in part, on facts otherwise available, including adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Non-Selected Companies’ Rate We made no changes to the methodology for determining a rate for companies not selected for individual examination from the Preliminary Results. However, due to changes in calculations for Agro Sevilla and Camacho, the non-selected rate changed for each of the three non-selected companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded. For these companies, we are applying an ad valorem subsidy rate of 8.50 percent. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Final Results of the Administrative Review We find the following net countervailable subsidy rates for the POR January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020: Producer/exporter Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop. And ........................................ 8.83 7 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Mar 08, 2023 Jkt 259001 Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Producer/exporter shall remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order Angel Camacho Alimentacio´n, S.L. and its cross-owned affiliates 8 .................................. This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable their responsibility concerning the to the Following Companies 9 disposition of proprietary information Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L ..... 8.50 disclosed under APO in accordance Alimentary Group Dcoop with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely S.Coop. And .......................... 8.50 written notification of the return or Aceitunas Torrent, S.L .............. 8.50 destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order, Disclosure is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an We intend to disclose calculations APO is a sanctionable violation. and analysis performed for these final results of review within five days after Notification to Interested Parties the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with The final results are issued and 19 CFR 351.224(b). published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Assessment Requirements CFR 351.221(b)(5). In accordance with section Dated: March 3, 2023. 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall Lisa W. Wang, determine, and CBP shall assess, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and countervailing duties on all appropriate Compliance. entries covered by this review. Appendix Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and days after publication of the final results Decision Memorandum of this review in the Federal Register. I. Summary If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. II. Background Court of International Trade, the III. Scope of the Order assessment instructions will direct CBP IV. Subsidies Valuation not to liquidate relevant entries until the V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and time for parties to file a request for a Adverse Inferences statutory injunction has expired (i.e., VI. Non-Selected Rate within 90 days of publication). VII. Analysis of Programs 8.08 Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, we also intend to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown above for the abovelisted companies with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of these final results of review. For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-others rate or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, 8 Commerce found the following companies to be cross-owned with Angel Camacho Alimentacio´n, S.L.: Grupo Angel Camacho, S.L., Cuarterola S.L., and Cucanoche S.L. 9 This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 VIII. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether Commerce’s Substantial Dependence Finding is Lawful and Supported by Substantial Evidence Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to All of Camacho’s Growers Because Two Growers Failed Verification Comment 3: Whether Agro Sevilla’s NonResponsive Growers Should Receive an AFA Rate Because They Are Affiliated with Agro Sevilla Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Include Two of Camacho’s Suppliers in the BPS Program Calculation Since They Were Primarily Suppliers and Only Grew a Small Portion of Their Olives Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Correct a Ministerial Error Regarding One of Agro Sevilla’s First-Tier Suppliers IX. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2023–04851 Filed 3–8–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14605-14606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04851]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-469-818]


Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
certain exporters/producers of ripe olives from Spain received 
countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR) January 1, 
2020, through December 31, 2020.

DATES: Applicable March 9, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg or Theodore Pearson, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1785 or (202) 482-2631, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Commerce published the Preliminary Results on September 6, 2022.\1\ 
On November 7, 2022, we released the final verification reports,\2\ 
and, on November 14, 2022, we invited parties to comment on the 
Preliminary Results.\3\ For a complete description of the events that 
occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\4\ On December 15, 2022, in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce 
extended the deadline for issuing the final results until March 3, 
2023.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020, 87 FR 54460 
(September 6, 2022) (Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Verification of the Questionnaire 
Responses of Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop. And.,'' dated November 
{7{time} , 2022; see also Memorandum, ``Verification of the 
Questionnaire Responses of Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. and Its 
Suppliers,'' dated November {7{time} , 2022.
    \3\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Briefing Schedule,'' dated November 
14, 2022.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of 
Ripe Olives from Spain,'' concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 
this notice.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review 2020,'' dated December 
15, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Amended Final Affirmative 
Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 83 
FR 37469 (August 1, 2018) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The products covered by the Order are ripe olives. A full 
description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised by the interested parties in their case and 
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 
list of these issues is provided in the appendix to this notice. The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and CVD 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, in September 2022, 
Commerce verified the subsidy information reported by Agro Sevilla 
Aceitunas

[[Page 14606]]

S.Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), Angel Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n, S.L. 
(Camacho) and certain suppliers to both companies. We used standard 
verification procedures, including an examination of relevant 
accounting and production records, and original source documents 
provided by Agro Sevilla, Camacho, and their suppliers.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on comments received from interested parties and issues 
originating from verification, we revised the calculation of the net 
countervailable subsidy rates for Agro Sevilla and Camacho. For a 
discussion of the issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Methodology

    Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act of 1930. For each of the subsidy 
programs found countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., 
a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a 
benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\7\ For a 
full description of the methodology underlying all of Commerce's 
conclusions, including our reliance, in part, on facts otherwise 
available, including adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant to 
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Non-Selected Companies' Rate

    We made no changes to the methodology for determining a rate for 
companies not selected for individual examination from the Preliminary 
Results. However, due to changes in calculations for Agro Sevilla and 
Camacho, the non-selected rate changed for each of the three non-
selected companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded. 
For these companies, we are applying an ad valorem subsidy rate of 8.50 
percent.

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    We find the following net countervailable subsidy rates for the POR 
January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Subsidy
                                                                 rate
                     Producer/exporter                       (percent ad
                                                               valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop. And.........................         8.83
Angel Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n, S.L. and its cross-owned         8.08
 affiliates \8\............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies \9\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L................................         8.50
Alimentary Group Dcoop S.Coop. And.........................         8.50
Aceitunas Torrent, S.L.....................................         8.50
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Commerce found the following companies to be cross-owned 
with Angel Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n, S.L.: Grupo Angel Camacho, 
S.L., Cuarterola S.L., and Cucanoche S.L.
    \9\ This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that 
were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, 
de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 
705(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to disclose calculations and analysis performed for these 
final results of review within five days after the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.224(b).

Assessment Requirements

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, 
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no 
earlier than 35 days after publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, we also intend to 
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing 
duties in the amounts shown above for the above-listed companies with 
regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of these 
final results of review. For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue 
to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-
others rate or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the 
company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, 
shall remain in effect until further notice.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    The final results are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: March 3, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation
V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences
VI. Non-Selected Rate
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Analysis of Comments
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce's Substantial Dependence Finding is 
Lawful and Supported by Substantial Evidence
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to All of Camacho's 
Growers Because Two Growers Failed Verification
    Comment 3: Whether Agro Sevilla's Non-Responsive Growers Should 
Receive an AFA Rate Because They Are Affiliated with Agro Sevilla
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Include Two of Camacho's 
Suppliers in the BPS Program Calculation Since They Were Primarily 
Suppliers and Only Grew a Small Portion of Their Olives
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Correct a Ministerial Error 
Regarding One of Agro Sevilla's First-Tier Suppliers
IX. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2023-04851 Filed 3-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.