Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020-2021, 14125-14127 [2023-04666]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2023 / Notices 20. Putian Yihong Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 21. Raoping HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. (d.b.a. Chen Chui Global Corp.) 22. Shaxian Hengtong Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 23. Shaxian Shiyiwood, Ltd. 24. Shenzhen Xinjintai Industrial Co., Ltd. 25. Shuyang Kevin International Co., Ltd. 26. Wuxi Boda Bamboo & Wood Industrial Co., Ltd. 27. Zhangzhou Wangjiamei Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. 28. Zhangzhou Yihong Industrial Co., Ltd. [FR Doc. 2023–04573 Filed 3–6–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is stainless steel flanges from India. For a complete description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–877] Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020– 2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that exporters/producers of stainless steel flanges from India made sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR) October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. We continue to find that Emerson Process Management (Emerson) and Echjay Forgings Private Limited (Echjay) had no reviewable shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. DATES: Applicable March 7, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benito Ballesteros or Christopher Maciuba, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7425 or (202) 482–0413, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Commerce selected two companies, Chandan Steel Limited (Chandan) and Goodluck India Limited (Goodluck),1 for 1 We initiated a review on both ‘‘Good Luck Engineering Co.’’ and ‘‘Goodluck India Ltd.’’ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 67685, 67686 (November 29, 2021). Subsequently, the company reported that Good Luck Engineering Co. is not a separate entity and is instead a business unit of Goodluck India Ltd. For the final results, the dumping margin calculated for Goodluck applies to entries from its business unit, Good Luck Engineering Co. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:49 Mar 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 individual examination in this review. On November 4, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results and invited interested parties to comment.2 On December 17, 2022, Echjay submitted a case brief.3 No other interested parties commented on the Preliminary Results. For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4 Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Analysis of Comments Received In the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we address the sole issue raised in the case brief submitted by Echjay, as reflected in Appendix I of this notice.6 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Changes Since the Preliminary Results We made no changes to the Preliminary Results based on comments from interested parties.7 However, in the Preliminary Results, we stated our intention to update the applicable countervailing duty (CVD) offset rate in Chandan’s and Goodluck’s margin calculation, once the new rates became available.8 Therefore, for the final results, we are updating the applicable 2 See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary No Shipment Determination, and Partial Rescission; 2020–2021, 87 FR 66645 (November 4, 2022) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 3 See Echjay’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated December 16, 2022. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 Id. 8 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 11– 12. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14125 CVD offset rates with the subsidy rates from the most recently-completed segment of the companion CVD proceeding (i.e., the final results of the 2020 administrative review).9 Final Determination of No Shipments We preliminarily found that Emerson and Echjay had no reviewable shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.10 Based on the comments received from Echjay, we continue to find that Echjay had no reviewable shipments.11 Moreover, no party commented on the Preliminary Results regarding the no-shipment decision for Emerson. Therefore, for these final results, we continue to find that these companies had no reviewable shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, and we will issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on these final results. Rate for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination The Act and Commerce’s regulations do not address the rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for guidance. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the weighted-average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.’’ For the final results, Commerce calculated estimated weighted-average dumping margins for Chandan and Goodluck that are not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Accordingly, Commerce has continued to calculate the rate for companies not selected for individual examination using a weighted average of the margins calculated for Chandan and Goodluck weighted by each 9 See Memoranda, ‘‘Final Analysis Memorandum for Chandan Steel Limited,’’ dated concurrently with this notice; and ‘‘Final Analysis Memorandum for Goodluck India Limited,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 10 See Preliminary Results, 87 FR at 66646. 11 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment. E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1 14126 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2023 / Notices For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, we will assign an assessment rate based on Final Results of Administrative Review the methodology described in the ‘‘Rate The final estimated weighted-average for Companies Not Selected for dumping margins are listed below for Individual Examination’’ section, above. the POR: We intend to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP no Weightedearlier than 35 days after the date of average publication of the final results of this Exporter/producer dumping review in the Federal Register. If a margin timely summons is filed at the U.S. (percent) Court of International Trade, the Chandan Steel Limited ......... 0.65 assessment instructions will direct CBP 13 Goodluck India Limited ..... 50.72 not to liquidate relevant entries until the Companies Not Selected for time for parties to file a request for a Individual Examination 14 .. 13.22 statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit performed for the final results within requirements will be effective for all five days of the publication of this shipments of the subject merchandise notice in the Federal Register, in entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). for consumption on or after the Assessment Rates publication date of the final results of Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the this administrative review, as provided Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) Commerce has determined, and CBP the cash deposit rate for Chandan, shall assess, antidumping duties on all Goodluck, and the companies not appropriate entries of subject selected for individual examination will merchandise covered by this review. be the rate established in the final Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for results of this administrative review; (2) Chandan and Goodluck, we calculated for merchandise exported by producers importer-specific ad valorem or exporters not covered by this review assessment rates based on the ratio of but covered in a prior segment of this the total amount of dumping calculated proceeding, the cash deposit rate will for the examined sales to the total continue to be the company-specific rate entered value of the sales. published for the most recentlyFor entries of subject merchandise completed segment of this proceeding; during the POR produced any of these (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered companies under review for which they by this review, a previous review, or the did not know their merchandise was original less than fair value (LTFV) destined for the United States, we will investigation, but the producer is, then instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed the cash deposit rate will be the rate entries at the all-others rate if there is no established for the most recentlyrate for the intermediate company(ies) completed segment of this proceeding involved in the transaction. for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the case deposit rate for all other 12 See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of Margin for producers or exporters will continue to Respondents Not Selected for Individual be 7.00 percent,15 the all-others rate Examination,’’ dated concurrently with this notice; established in the LTFV investigation. see also, e.g., Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the These cash deposits, when imposed, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and shall remain in effect until further Partial Rescission; 2018–2019, 85 FR 75686, 74687 notice. (November 23, 2020), unchanged in Xanthan Gum ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 respondent’s publicly-ranged total U.S. sale values.12 from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 2019, 86 FR 16189 (March 26, 2021); Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order; 2018–2019, 85 FR 39534 (July 1, 2020), unchanged in Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order; 2018–2019, 85 FR 67512 (October 23, 2020); Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F. 3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). 13 This rate applies to the following business unit: Goodluck India Limited and Good Luck Engineering Co. 14 See Appendix II for a full list of these companies. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:49 Mar 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure 15 See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with the Final Determination of Antidumping Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination, 86 FR 50325 (August 30, 2021). PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the countervailing duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: March 1, 2023. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issue Comment: Echjay No Shipment Status VI. Recommendation Appendix II List of Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 1. Ae Engineers & Exporters 2. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. LTD 3. BFN Forgings Private Limited (formerly Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited) 16 4. Broadway Overseas Ltd. 5. CHW Forge Private 16 BFN Forgings Private Limited (formerly Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited) is part of a collapsed entity with the following companies: Viraj Impoexpo, Ltd.; Bebitz USA, Inc. (Bebitz USA); Flanschen werk Bebitz GmbH (FBG); Viraj Alloys, Ltd.; Viraj Forgings, Ltd.; Viraj Profiles Limited (Viraj); and Viraj USA, Inc. (Viraj USA). See e.g., Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstance Determination, 83 FR 40745 (August 16, 2018). Commerce inadvertently referenced Viraj Profiles Limited as a separate entity under review in the Preliminary Results. See 87 FR at 66648. E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2023 / Notices 6. Dart Global Logistics Pvt. 7. Dongguan Good Luck Furniture Industrial Co., Ltd. 8. Dongguan Good Luck Industrial Co., Ltd. 9. Expeditors International 10. G I Auto Private 11. G.I. Auto Pvt. Ltd. 12. Hilton Metal Forging Limited 13. Jai Auto Pvt. Limited 14. Jay Jagdamba Limited 15. Katariya Steel Distributors 16. Kisaan Die Tech Pvt Ltd. 17. Pradeep Metals Limited 18. Rajan Techno Cast 19. Rajan Techno Cast Pvt. Ltd. 20. Shree Jay Jagdamba Flanges Private Limited 21. Transworld Enterprises [FR Doc. 2023–04666 Filed 3–6–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–074] Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS) from the People’s Republic of China (China) during the period of review (POR), January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable March 7, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James R. Hepburn or Scarlet K. Jaldin, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1882 or (202) 482–4275, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:49 Mar 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 Background On April 12, 2022, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the countervailing duty order on CAAS from China with respect to three companies.1 On September 30, 2022, Commerce extended the deadline for completion of these preliminary results until no later than February 28, 2023.2 For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as the appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade/gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Scope of the Order The product covered by the Order is CAAS from China. For a complete description of the scope of this Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 21619, 21635 (April 12, 2022); see also Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 2157 (February 6, 2019) (Order). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of the Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021,’’ dated September 30, 2022. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China; 2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14127 Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs preliminarily found to be countervailable, we preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution from an authority that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient and that the subsidy is specific.4 For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results, including our reliance, in part, on facts available with adverse inferences pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. In making these findings, Commerce relied, in part, on facts available and, because the Government of China (GOC) did not respond to the Initial Questionnaire,5 Commerce finds that the GOC did not provide necessary information, as requested. On that basis, Commerce determines that the GOC did not act to the best of its ability to respond to Commerce’s request for information and, therefore, in reaching these preliminary results of review, we drew an adverse inference where appropriate in selecting from among the facts otherwise available. For further information, see the ‘‘Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse Inferences’’ section in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Results of Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), Commerce calculated a countervailable subsidy rate for the mandatory respondents that are identified below. Because there are no other producers or exporters subject to this review and not selected for individual examination (i.e., nonselected companies), Commerce does not need to establish a rate for such companies in this review. 4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. 5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty Questionnaire,’’ dated July 13, 2022 (Initial Questionnaire). E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14125-14127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-877]


Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 
2020-2021

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
exporters/producers of stainless steel flanges from India made sales of 
subject merchandise at prices below normal value during the period of 
review (POR) October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. We continue 
to find that Emerson Process Management (Emerson) and Echjay Forgings 
Private Limited (Echjay) had no reviewable shipments of subject 
merchandise during the POR.

DATES: Applicable March 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benito Ballesteros or Christopher 
Maciuba, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7425 
or (202) 482-0413, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Commerce selected two companies, Chandan Steel Limited (Chandan) 
and Goodluck India Limited (Goodluck),\1\ for individual examination in 
this review. On November 4, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary 
Results and invited interested parties to comment.\2\ On December 17, 
2022, Echjay submitted a case brief.\3\ No other interested parties 
commented on the Preliminary Results. For a complete description of the 
events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\4\ Commerce conducted this administrative review 
in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ We initiated a review on both ``Good Luck Engineering Co.'' 
and ``Goodluck India Ltd.'' See Initiation of Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 67685, 67686 
(November 29, 2021). Subsequently, the company reported that Good 
Luck Engineering Co. is not a separate entity and is instead a 
business unit of Goodluck India Ltd. For the final results, the 
dumping margin calculated for Goodluck applies to entries from its 
business unit, Good Luck Engineering Co.
    \2\ See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Preliminary Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary No Shipment 
Determination, and Partial Rescission; 2020-2021, 87 FR 66645 
(November 4, 2022) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \3\ See Echjay's Letter, ``Case Brief,'' dated December 16, 
2022.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Issues 
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021,'' dated concurrently with, 
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is stainless steel flanges 
from India. For a complete description of the scope, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    In the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we address the sole issue 
raised in the case brief submitted by Echjay, as reflected in Appendix 
I of this notice.\6\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    We made no changes to the Preliminary Results based on comments 
from interested parties.\7\ However, in the Preliminary Results, we 
stated our intention to update the applicable countervailing duty (CVD) 
offset rate in Chandan's and Goodluck's margin calculation, once the 
new rates became available.\8\ Therefore, for the final results, we are 
updating the applicable CVD offset rates with the subsidy rates from 
the most recently-completed segment of the companion CVD proceeding 
(i.e., the final results of the 2020 administrative review).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Id.
    \8\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 11-12.
    \9\ See Memoranda, ``Final Analysis Memorandum for Chandan Steel 
Limited,'' dated concurrently with this notice; and ``Final Analysis 
Memorandum for Goodluck India Limited,'' dated concurrently with 
this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    We preliminarily found that Emerson and Echjay had no reviewable 
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\10\ Based on the 
comments received from Echjay, we continue to find that Echjay had no 
reviewable shipments.\11\ Moreover, no party commented on the 
Preliminary Results regarding the no-shipment decision for Emerson. 
Therefore, for these final results, we continue to find that these 
companies had no reviewable shipments of subject merchandise during the 
POR, and we will issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection (CBP) based on these final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Preliminary Results, 87 FR at 66646.
    \11\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination

    The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the rate to be 
applied to companies not selected for individual examination when 
Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to 
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the 
all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for 
guidance. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is 
normally ``an amount equal to the weighted-average of the estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and 
producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis 
margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts 
available{time} .''
    For the final results, Commerce calculated estimated weighted-
average dumping margins for Chandan and Goodluck that are not zero, de 
minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Accordingly, 
Commerce has continued to calculate the rate for companies not selected 
for individual examination using a weighted average of the margins 
calculated for Chandan and Goodluck weighted by each

[[Page 14126]]

respondent's publicly-ranged total U.S. sale values.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of Margin for Respondents Not 
Selected for Individual Examination,'' dated concurrently with this 
notice; see also, e.g., Xanthan Gum from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, and Partial Rescission; 2018-2019, 85 FR 75686, 74687 
(November 23, 2020), unchanged in Xanthan Gum from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2018-2019, 86 FR 16189 (March 26, 2021); Emulsion Styrene-
Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 
the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order; 2018-2019, 
85 FR 39534 (July 1, 2020), unchanged in Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene 
Rubber from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the 
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order; 2018-2019, 85 
FR 67512 (October 23, 2020); Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 
F. 3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Administrative Review

    The final estimated weighted-average dumping margins are listed 
below for the POR:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                    Exporter/producer                     dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandan Steel Limited...................................            0.65
Goodluck India Limited \13\.............................           50.72
Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination \14\..           13.22
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ This rate applies to the following business unit: Goodluck 
India Limited and Good Luck Engineering Co.
    \14\ See Appendix II for a full list of these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed for the final 
results within five days of the publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise 
covered by this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for Chandan 
and Goodluck, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem assessment 
rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for 
the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales.
    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced any of 
these companies under review for which they did not know their 
merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate 
for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
    For the companies which were not selected for individual 
examination, we will assign an assessment rate based on the methodology 
described in the ``Rate for Companies Not Selected for Individual 
Examination'' section, above.
    We intend to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP no 
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results 
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at 
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for Chandan, Goodluck, 
and the companies not selected for individual examination will be the 
rate established in the final results of this administrative review; 
(2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered by 
this review but covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published 
for the most recently-completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered by this review, a previous review, or 
the original less than fair value (LTFV) investigation, but the 
producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established 
for the most recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the 
producer of the merchandise; (4) the case deposit rate for all other 
producers or exporters will continue to be 7.00 percent,\15\ the all-
others rate established in the LTFV investigation. These cash deposits, 
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Notice of Court 
Decision Not in Harmony with the Final Determination of Antidumping 
Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination, 86 FR 50325 
(August 30, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure 
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption 
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred 
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an 
increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the 
countervailing duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: March 1, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issue Comment: Echjay No Shipment Status
VI. Recommendation

Appendix II

List of Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination

1. Ae Engineers & Exporters
2. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. LTD
3. BFN Forgings Private Limited (formerly Bebitz Flanges Works 
Private Limited) \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ BFN Forgings Private Limited (formerly Bebitz Flanges Works 
Private Limited) is part of a collapsed entity with the following 
companies: Viraj Impoexpo, Ltd.; Bebitz USA, Inc. (Bebitz USA); 
Flanschen werk Bebitz GmbH (FBG); Viraj Alloys, Ltd.; Viraj 
Forgings, Ltd.; Viraj Profiles Limited (Viraj); and Viraj USA, Inc. 
(Viraj USA). See e.g., Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Final 
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final 
Affirmative Critical Circumstance Determination, 83 FR 40745 (August 
16, 2018). Commerce inadvertently referenced Viraj Profiles Limited 
as a separate entity under review in the Preliminary Results. See 87 
FR at 66648.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Broadway Overseas Ltd.
5. CHW Forge Private

[[Page 14127]]

6. Dart Global Logistics Pvt.
7. Dongguan Good Luck Furniture Industrial Co., Ltd.
8. Dongguan Good Luck Industrial Co., Ltd.
9. Expeditors International
10. G I Auto Private
11. G.I. Auto Pvt. Ltd.
12. Hilton Metal Forging Limited
13. Jai Auto Pvt. Limited
14. Jay Jagdamba Limited
15. Katariya Steel Distributors
16. Kisaan Die Tech Pvt Ltd.
17. Pradeep Metals Limited
18. Rajan Techno Cast
19. Rajan Techno Cast Pvt. Ltd.
20. Shree Jay Jagdamba Flanges Private Limited
21. Transworld Enterprises

[FR Doc. 2023-04666 Filed 3-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.