BMW of North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 14245-14247 [2023-04662]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2023 / Notices
you periodically check the Docket for
new submissions and supporting
material.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Will my comments be made available to
the public?
If you wish to submit comments
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit the information you
claim to be confidential commercial
information by email to SmallVessels@
dot.gov. Include in the email subject
heading ‘‘Contains Confidential
Commercial Information’’ or ‘‘Contains
CCI’’ and state in your submission, with
specificity, the basis for any such
confidential claim highlighting or
denoting the CCI portions. If possible,
please provide a summary of your
submission that can be made available
to the public.
In the event MARAD receives a
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
request for the information, procedures
described in the Department’s FOIA
regulation at 49 CFR 7.29 will be
followed. Only information that is
ultimately determined to be confidential
under those procedures will be exempt
from disclosure under FOIA.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). For information on DOT’s
compliance with the Privacy Act, please
visit https://www.transportation.gov/
privacy.
(Authority: 49 CFR 1.93(a), 46 U.S.C. 55103,
46 U.S.C. 12121)
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:49 Mar 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
AGENCY:
May I submit comments confidentially?
[FR Doc. 2023–04644 Filed 3–6–23; 8:45 am]
[Docket No. NHTSA–2017–0042; Notice 2]
BMW of North America, LLC, Grant of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Yes. Be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, will be made
publicly available.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
14245
Notice of receipt of BMW’s petition
was published in the Federal Register
(82 FR 40640) with a 30-day public
comment period, on August 25, 2017.
One comment was received. To view the
petition and all supporting documents
log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) web page
at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instruction to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2017–
0042.’’
II. Vehicles Involved
BMW of North America, LLC
(BMW), a subsidiary of BMW AG,
Munich, Germany, has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2018 BMW M4
Coupe and BMW M4 convertible motor
vehicles do not fully comply with
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 110, Tire Selection and
Rims and Motor Home/Recreation
Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity
Information for Motor Vehicles with a
GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000
pounds) or Less. BMW filed a
noncompliance report dated April 26,
2017, and subsequently petitioned
NHTSA on May 19, 2017, for a decision
that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety. This document
announces the grant of BMW’s petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ahmad Barnes, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
telephone (202) 366–7236.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Approximately 93 MY 2018 BMW M4
Coupe and BMW M4 Convertible motor
vehicles, manufactured between
February 28, 2017, and March 24, 2017,
are potentially involved.
I. Overview
BMW has determined that certain MY
2018 BMW M4 Coupe and BMW M4
convertible motor vehicles do not fully
comply with one or more of the
following paragraphs: S4.3(a), S4.3(c)
and S4.3(d) of FMVSS No. 110, Tire
Selection and Rims and Motor Home/
Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load
Carrying Capacity Information for Motor
Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less (49
CFR 571.110). BMW filed a
noncompliance report dated April 26,
2017, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. BMW
subsequently petitioned NHTSA on May
19, 2017, for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of
49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that
this noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556,
Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or
Noncompliance.
IV. Rule Requirements
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Noncompliance
BMW describes three noncompliances
of the affected vehicles equipped with a
vehicle placard that may not fully
conform to FMVSS No. 110. Although
the affected vehicles were equipped
with 20-inch tires, the FMVSS No. 110
vehicle placard states that the vehicles
were equipped with 18-inch tires.
Additionally, the vehicle placard for the
BMW M4 Coupe states a vehicle
capacity weight of 390 kilograms (kg)
although it should state a vehicle
capacity weight of 381 kg. Furthermore,
the placard for the BMW M4
Convertible states a manufacturer’s
recommended cold tire inflation
pressure of 32 psi when it should state
a tire inflation pressure of 33 psi.
Paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110
includes the requirements relevant to
this petition. Each vehicle, except for a
trailer or incomplete vehicle, shall show
the information specified in paragraph
S4.3 (a) through (g), and may show, at
the manufacturer’s option, the
information specified in paragraphs
S4.3 (h) and (i), on a placard
permanently affixed to the driver’s side
B-pillar. The information shall be in the
English language and conform in color
and format, not including the border
surrounding the entire placard, as
shown in the example set forth in Figure
1 of FMVSS No. 110. Additionally, the
vehicle placard must state the vehicle
manufacturer’s recommended cold tire
inflation pressure for front, rear and
spare tires. The vehicle placard must
state the tire size designation, indicated
by the headings ‘‘size’’ or ‘‘original tire
size’’ or ‘‘original size’’ and ‘‘spare tire’’
or ‘‘spare,’’ for the tires installed at the
time of first purchase for purposes other
than resale.
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
14246
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
V. Summary of BMW’s Petition
The following views and arguments
presented in this section, ‘‘V. Summary
of BMW’s Petition,’’ are the views and
arguments provided by BMW. They
have not been evaluated by the Agency
and do not reflect the views of the
Agency. BMW describes the subject
noncompliance and states its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
BMW states that the affected BMW
M4 Coupe motor vehicles were
equipped with 20-inch tires while the
vehicle placard incorrectly states that
the vehicles are equipped with 18-inch
tires and indicates a vehicle capacity
weight of 390kg. The placard should
state that the vehicles are equipped with
20-inch tires and have a vehicle
capacity weight of 381 kg.
Based on its analysis and evaluation
of the components, and systems
including brakes, steering, and
suspension in the BMW M4 Coupe
motor vehicles, BMW believes that the
incorrect vehicle capacity weight of 390
kg provided on the noncompliant
vehicle placard ‘‘will not result in a
vehicle overload condition.’’
Furthermore, BMW explains that ‘‘the
vehicle was designed to account for a
larger vehicle capacity weight than the
weight stated on the tire information
placard.’’
BMW states that the BMW M4 Coupe
vehicles ‘‘are equipped with a Part 567
certification label which states accurate
information for the Gross Vehicle
Weight Rating (GVWR).’’ Therefore,
BMW contends that ‘‘a vehicle operator
who uses this information would be
able to determine the correct maximum
vehicle weight.’’
The BMW M4 Convertible vehicles
were equipped with a tire information
placard that incorrectly states that they
were equipped with 18-inch tires when
it should state that the subject vehicles
were equipped with 20-inch tires. The
placard also lists the manufacturer’s
recommended tire inflation pressure as
32 psi when it should have been marked
33 psi.
BMW claims that the tires installed on
the subject convertible motor vehicles
will not result in a vehicle overload
condition in both the front and rear tires
when the subject tires are inflated to the
incorrectly listed manufacturer’s
recommended cold tire inflation
pressure of 32 psi. BMW says that the
subject convertible vehicle tires comply
with FMVSS No. 110 S4.2.1 which
requires the vehicle normal load to be
no more than 94 percent of the load
rating at the vehicle manufacturer’s
recommended cold inflation pressure
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:49 Mar 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
for that tire. The vehicle normal load on
the tire is the load on an individual tire
that is calculated by distributing each
axle’s share of the curb weight,
accessory weight, and normal occupant
weight, and dividing by 2. BMW
calculated that a normal load per front
tire is 534 kg and a normal load per rear
tire is 466 kg. According to BMW’s
assessment, the subject tires comply
with FMVSS No. 110 S4.1.2 which
requires the vehicle normal load to be
no more than 94 percent of the load
rating at the vehicle manufacturer’s
recommended cold inflation pressure
for that tire.
The load rating is the highest vehicle
maximum load on the tire for the
vehicle and is provided by the sources
listed in S4.4.2 (a). Using the European
Tyre and Rim Technical Organization
(ETRTO) Standard Load table, BMW
says the load rating for the front tire is
605 kg and the load rating for the rear
tires is 700 kg. The sum of the load
ratings for the front tires is 1,210 kg and
the GAWR is 1,050 kg and the sum of
the load ratings for the rear tires is 1,400
kg and the GAWR is 1,250 kg. Therefore,
BMW says the 20-inch front and rear
tires, ‘‘inflated to 32 psi, are sufficient
to support vehicle loading.’’
BMW says there are multiple sources
available to the consumer to determine
the correct tire pressure for tires
equipped on the subject convertible
vehicles. Specifically, BMW refers to
FMVSS No. 110 S4.3(f) which requires
that the tire information placard
instructs the consumer to see Owner’s
Manual for additional information.
BMW also refers to FMVSS No 138
S4.5(a) which requires the Owner’s
Manual to contain a statement that
instructs the consumer to check each
tire’s inflation pressure monthly and if
the consumer finds that the vehicle has
tires of a different size than the size
indicated on the vehicle placard or tire
inflation pressure label, the consumer
should determine the proper tire
inflation pressure for those tires.
Because those statements required by
FMVSS No. 110 S4.3(f) and FMVSS No.
138 S4.5(a) are present in the Owner’s
Manual provided hardcopy and
electronically in the vehicle, BMW
contends that a consumer would be able
to access the information needed to set
the tire inflation pressures to the correct
levels. Furthermore, BMW says a
consumer can contact its customer
relations service or its roadside
assistance service which has
representatives available 24/7 to assist
with determining the correct tire
pressure. The consumer is able to access
the contact information for the roadside
assistance service in the vehicle’s
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
portfolio, the vehicle’s media console
and via the emergency call button on
the overhead console. The customer
relations contact information can be
found in the vehicle’s portfolio, Owner’s
Manual and the Service and Warranty
Book.
BMW states that its customer relations
service has not received any contacts
regarding the subject noncompliances.
BMW is also unaware of any consumer
experiencing issues or any accidents or
injuries related to the subject
noncompliances
BMW says that NHTSA has granted
prior petitions that are similar to the
subject petition. BMW does not
reference a specific petition but states
that NHTSA found ‘‘that although the
tire information placard displayed the
manufacturer’s recommended cold tire
inflation pressure which was a smaller
value than that which was required for
the tires equipped on the vehicle, the
load carrying capacity of the equipped
tires, at this smaller tire pressure, was
still sufficient and would not lead to a
vehicle overload condition.
BMW concluded by expressing the
belief that the noncompliances are
inconsequential as they relate to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
VI. Comments
NHTSA received one comment from
the general public. While NHTSA takes
great interest in the public’s concerns
and appreciates the commenter’s
feedback, the comment does not address
the purpose of this particular petition.
VII. NHTSA’s Analysis
The intent of FMVSS No. 110 is to
ensure that vehicles are equipped with
tires that are properly inflated to handle
maximum vehicle loads and to provide
relevant information to prevent
overloading.
According to BMW, the M4 Coupe
model’s Tire and Loading Information
label incorrectly displays a Vehicle
Capacity Weight of 390 kg instead of the
correct amount of 381 kg. BMW has
determined that there would not be any
adverse impact on these vehicles
because the vehicle was designed to
account for a larger vehicle capacity
weight than the weight stated on the tire
loading label. NHTSA concurs with
BMW’s rationale. A load of 9 kg ((20)
pounds or (5) pounds per tire) is a 1
percent difference in the loading on
each tire. We believe this loading to be
well within the design safety factor of
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
the tires. As stated by BMW, we also
agree that the additional 9 kg load
should not adversely affect vehicle
braking, steering and stability due to the
robustness of the subject vehicles being
capable of accounting for a larger
vehicle capacity weight than stated on
the tire information placard. This
marginal load should be within the
design safety factor of the vehicle
components as well.
NHTSA also concurs with BMW’s
statement that a vehicle designed to
withstand a larger capacity weight than
stated on its tire loading label would not
present a consequential safety problem.
Although the M4 Convertible is
equipped with 20-inch tires, the model’s
Tire and Loading Information label
incorrectly displays a cold tire pressure
of 32 psi when it should display 33 psi.
Considering the specifications of the 20inch tires in the ETRTO reference book,
it is apparent that even at the lower
listed tire pressure, the tires are more
than adequate to carry the vehicle’s
load. The vehicle’s equipped tires are
Extra Load (XL) tires. ETRTO specifies
use of Standard Load tables for tire
pressures up to 36 psi. The load index
for the front tires is 94 and at a pressure
of 32 psi results in a load capacity of
605 kgs or 1210 kgs for the front axle.
The GAWR for the front axle is 1050
kgs. The load index for the rear tires is
99 and at a pressure of 32 psi results in
a load capacity of 700 kgs or 1400 kgs
for the rear axle. The GAWR for the rear
axle is 1250 kgs. Therefore, there is
adequate load carrying capacity in the
tire at the lower pressure and there is no
safety issue resulting in underinflation
of tires if a consumer uses the tire
pressure on the vehicle’s label.
Paragraph S4.2.1.2 of FMVSS No. 110
requires that the vehicle normal load on
the tire shall not be greater than 94
percent of the load rating at the vehicle
manufacturer’s recommended cold
inflation pressure for that tire. The
vehicle normal load per tire is
calculated by distributing 2 occupants
(for a 4-occupant vehicle), at the front
axle. Per FMVSS No. 110 definition of
vehicle capacity weight, using 68 kgs
per occupant results in a vehicle normal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:49 Mar 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
load per front tire of 534 kgs and a
normal load per rear tire of 466 kgs.
BMW explained that they utilized a
worst-case scenario by calculating the
vehicle’s normal load using an
automatic transmission because it has a
greater weight than the manual
transmission, both of which may be
utilized in the subject vehicles. For the
front tires, the load rating is 605 kgs
each, when multiplied by 94 percent,
yields a value of 568 kgs, which exceeds
the previously stated 534 kg normal
vehicle load value. For the rear tires, the
load rating is 700 kgs each, when
multiplied by 94 percent yields a value
of 658 kgs, which exceeds the
previously stated 466 kg normal vehicle
load value. NHTSA concurs with
utilizing a worst-case scenario approach
to these calculations as it is all inclusive
of the affected vehicle population.
The purpose of the FMVSS No. 110
tire information label is to convey
accurate information for the vehicle to
be operated in a safe manner. As is the
case with BMW in this petition, should
a vehicle operator require additional or
corroborating information regarding the
vehicle’s Tire and Loading Information
Label, there are other information
sources that can be consulted to clearly
identify—in this case—the correct tire
pressure. Should a vehicle operator ever
question what the correct tire pressure
should be, they can consult the vehicle’s
hardcopy owner’s manual, the invehicle electronic owner’s manual, or
contact BMW directly for further
information in order to verify the correct
tire pressure.
NHTSA has previously granted
petitions for inconsequential
noncompliance regarding FMVSS No.
110 related to vehicles for which the
vehicle placard contained tire size and
tire pressure information which did not
match the tires equipped on the vehicle
under similar conditions.
VIII. NHTSA’s Decision
NHTSA agrees with BMW that the
subject noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety
because there would be no effect of the
noncompliance on the operational
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
14247
safety of the subject vehicles. No
adverse impact on braking, steering or
on-road stability can result in driving
the subject vehicles at the incorrect
vehicle capacity weight listed on the tire
information placard. The vehicles were
designed to account for a larger vehicle
capacity weight than the weight stated
on the tire information placard.
Furthermore, the affected vehicles can
maintain the maximum vehicle loads
even at the lower manufacturer’s
recommended cold tire inflation
pressure on the tire information placard.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA finds that BMW has met its
burden of persuasion that the FMVSS
No. 110 noncompliance in the affected
vehicles is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety. Accordingly, BMW’s
petition is granted and BMW is
exempted from the obligation of
providing notification of, and a free
remedy for, that noncompliance under
49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the subject
vehicles that BMW no longer controlled
at the time it determined that the
noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve
vehicle distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after BMW notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Otto G. Matheke, III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023–04662 Filed 3–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14245-14247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04662]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2017-0042; Notice 2]
BMW of North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC (BMW), a subsidiary of BMW AG,
Munich, Germany, has determined that certain model year (MY) 2018 BMW
M4 Coupe and BMW M4 convertible motor vehicles do not fully comply with
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire Selection
and Rims and Motor Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying
Capacity Information for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms
(10,000 pounds) or Less. BMW filed a noncompliance report dated April
26, 2017, and subsequently petitioned NHTSA on May 19, 2017, for a
decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety. This document announces the grant of
BMW's petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ahmad Barnes, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
telephone (202) 366-7236.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
BMW has determined that certain MY 2018 BMW M4 Coupe and BMW M4
convertible motor vehicles do not fully comply with one or more of the
following paragraphs: S4.3(a), S4.3(c) and S4.3(d) of FMVSS No. 110,
Tire Selection and Rims and Motor Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load
Carrying Capacity Information for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less (49 CFR 571.110). BMW filed a
noncompliance report dated April 26, 2017, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. BMW subsequently
petitioned NHTSA on May 19, 2017, for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR
part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
Notice of receipt of BMW's petition was published in the Federal
Register (82 FR 40640) with a 30-day public comment period, on August
25, 2017. One comment was received. To view the petition and all
supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) web page at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online
search instruction to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2017-0042.''
II. Vehicles Involved
Approximately 93 MY 2018 BMW M4 Coupe and BMW M4 Convertible motor
vehicles, manufactured between February 28, 2017, and March 24, 2017,
are potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance
BMW describes three noncompliances of the affected vehicles
equipped with a vehicle placard that may not fully conform to FMVSS No.
110. Although the affected vehicles were equipped with 20-inch tires,
the FMVSS No. 110 vehicle placard states that the vehicles were
equipped with 18-inch tires. Additionally, the vehicle placard for the
BMW M4 Coupe states a vehicle capacity weight of 390 kilograms (kg)
although it should state a vehicle capacity weight of 381 kg.
Furthermore, the placard for the BMW M4 Convertible states a
manufacturer's recommended cold tire inflation pressure of 32 psi when
it should state a tire inflation pressure of 33 psi.
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110 includes the requirements relevant
to this petition. Each vehicle, except for a trailer or incomplete
vehicle, shall show the information specified in paragraph S4.3 (a)
through (g), and may show, at the manufacturer's option, the
information specified in paragraphs S4.3 (h) and (i), on a placard
permanently affixed to the driver's side B-pillar. The information
shall be in the English language and conform in color and format, not
including the border surrounding the entire placard, as shown in the
example set forth in Figure 1 of FMVSS No. 110. Additionally, the
vehicle placard must state the vehicle manufacturer's recommended cold
tire inflation pressure for front, rear and spare tires. The vehicle
placard must state the tire size designation, indicated by the headings
``size'' or ``original tire size'' or ``original size'' and ``spare
tire'' or ``spare,'' for the tires installed at the time of first
purchase for purposes other than resale.
[[Page 14246]]
V. Summary of BMW's Petition
The following views and arguments presented in this section, ``V.
Summary of BMW's Petition,'' are the views and arguments provided by
BMW. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the
views of the Agency. BMW describes the subject noncompliance and states
its belief that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to
motor vehicle safety.
BMW states that the affected BMW M4 Coupe motor vehicles were
equipped with 20-inch tires while the vehicle placard incorrectly
states that the vehicles are equipped with 18-inch tires and indicates
a vehicle capacity weight of 390kg. The placard should state that the
vehicles are equipped with 20-inch tires and have a vehicle capacity
weight of 381 kg.
Based on its analysis and evaluation of the components, and systems
including brakes, steering, and suspension in the BMW M4 Coupe motor
vehicles, BMW believes that the incorrect vehicle capacity weight of
390 kg provided on the noncompliant vehicle placard ``will not result
in a vehicle overload condition.'' Furthermore, BMW explains that ``the
vehicle was designed to account for a larger vehicle capacity weight
than the weight stated on the tire information placard.''
BMW states that the BMW M4 Coupe vehicles ``are equipped with a
Part 567 certification label which states accurate information for the
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR).'' Therefore, BMW contends that ``a
vehicle operator who uses this information would be able to determine
the correct maximum vehicle weight.''
The BMW M4 Convertible vehicles were equipped with a tire
information placard that incorrectly states that they were equipped
with 18-inch tires when it should state that the subject vehicles were
equipped with 20-inch tires. The placard also lists the manufacturer's
recommended tire inflation pressure as 32 psi when it should have been
marked 33 psi.
BMW claims that the tires installed on the subject convertible
motor vehicles will not result in a vehicle overload condition in both
the front and rear tires when the subject tires are inflated to the
incorrectly listed manufacturer's recommended cold tire inflation
pressure of 32 psi. BMW says that the subject convertible vehicle tires
comply with FMVSS No. 110 S4.2.1 which requires the vehicle normal load
to be no more than 94 percent of the load rating at the vehicle
manufacturer's recommended cold inflation pressure for that tire. The
vehicle normal load on the tire is the load on an individual tire that
is calculated by distributing each axle's share of the curb weight,
accessory weight, and normal occupant weight, and dividing by 2. BMW
calculated that a normal load per front tire is 534 kg and a normal
load per rear tire is 466 kg. According to BMW's assessment, the
subject tires comply with FMVSS No. 110 S4.1.2 which requires the
vehicle normal load to be no more than 94 percent of the load rating at
the vehicle manufacturer's recommended cold inflation pressure for that
tire.
The load rating is the highest vehicle maximum load on the tire for
the vehicle and is provided by the sources listed in S4.4.2 (a). Using
the European Tyre and Rim Technical Organization (ETRTO) Standard Load
table, BMW says the load rating for the front tire is 605 kg and the
load rating for the rear tires is 700 kg. The sum of the load ratings
for the front tires is 1,210 kg and the GAWR is 1,050 kg and the sum of
the load ratings for the rear tires is 1,400 kg and the GAWR is 1,250
kg. Therefore, BMW says the 20-inch front and rear tires, ``inflated to
32 psi, are sufficient to support vehicle loading.''
BMW says there are multiple sources available to the consumer to
determine the correct tire pressure for tires equipped on the subject
convertible vehicles. Specifically, BMW refers to FMVSS No. 110 S4.3(f)
which requires that the tire information placard instructs the consumer
to see Owner's Manual for additional information. BMW also refers to
FMVSS No 138 S4.5(a) which requires the Owner's Manual to contain a
statement that instructs the consumer to check each tire's inflation
pressure monthly and if the consumer finds that the vehicle has tires
of a different size than the size indicated on the vehicle placard or
tire inflation pressure label, the consumer should determine the proper
tire inflation pressure for those tires.
Because those statements required by FMVSS No. 110 S4.3(f) and
FMVSS No. 138 S4.5(a) are present in the Owner's Manual provided
hardcopy and electronically in the vehicle, BMW contends that a
consumer would be able to access the information needed to set the tire
inflation pressures to the correct levels. Furthermore, BMW says a
consumer can contact its customer relations service or its roadside
assistance service which has representatives available 24/7 to assist
with determining the correct tire pressure. The consumer is able to
access the contact information for the roadside assistance service in
the vehicle's portfolio, the vehicle's media console and via the
emergency call button on the overhead console. The customer relations
contact information can be found in the vehicle's portfolio, Owner's
Manual and the Service and Warranty Book.
BMW states that its customer relations service has not received any
contacts regarding the subject noncompliances. BMW is also unaware of
any consumer experiencing issues or any accidents or injuries related
to the subject noncompliances
BMW says that NHTSA has granted prior petitions that are similar to
the subject petition. BMW does not reference a specific petition but
states that NHTSA found ``that although the tire information placard
displayed the manufacturer's recommended cold tire inflation pressure
which was a smaller value than that which was required for the tires
equipped on the vehicle, the load carrying capacity of the equipped
tires, at this smaller tire pressure, was still sufficient and would
not lead to a vehicle overload condition.
BMW concluded by expressing the belief that the noncompliances are
inconsequential as they relate to motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
VI. Comments
NHTSA received one comment from the general public. While NHTSA
takes great interest in the public's concerns and appreciates the
commenter's feedback, the comment does not address the purpose of this
particular petition.
VII. NHTSA's Analysis
The intent of FMVSS No. 110 is to ensure that vehicles are equipped
with tires that are properly inflated to handle maximum vehicle loads
and to provide relevant information to prevent overloading.
According to BMW, the M4 Coupe model's Tire and Loading Information
label incorrectly displays a Vehicle Capacity Weight of 390 kg instead
of the correct amount of 381 kg. BMW has determined that there would
not be any adverse impact on these vehicles because the vehicle was
designed to account for a larger vehicle capacity weight than the
weight stated on the tire loading label. NHTSA concurs with BMW's
rationale. A load of 9 kg ((20) pounds or (5) pounds per tire) is a 1
percent difference in the loading on each tire. We believe this loading
to be well within the design safety factor of
[[Page 14247]]
the tires. As stated by BMW, we also agree that the additional 9 kg
load should not adversely affect vehicle braking, steering and
stability due to the robustness of the subject vehicles being capable
of accounting for a larger vehicle capacity weight than stated on the
tire information placard. This marginal load should be within the
design safety factor of the vehicle components as well.
NHTSA also concurs with BMW's statement that a vehicle designed to
withstand a larger capacity weight than stated on its tire loading
label would not present a consequential safety problem. Although the M4
Convertible is equipped with 20-inch tires, the model's Tire and
Loading Information label incorrectly displays a cold tire pressure of
32 psi when it should display 33 psi. Considering the specifications of
the 20-inch tires in the ETRTO reference book, it is apparent that even
at the lower listed tire pressure, the tires are more than adequate to
carry the vehicle's load. The vehicle's equipped tires are Extra Load
(XL) tires. ETRTO specifies use of Standard Load tables for tire
pressures up to 36 psi. The load index for the front tires is 94 and at
a pressure of 32 psi results in a load capacity of 605 kgs or 1210 kgs
for the front axle. The GAWR for the front axle is 1050 kgs. The load
index for the rear tires is 99 and at a pressure of 32 psi results in a
load capacity of 700 kgs or 1400 kgs for the rear axle. The GAWR for
the rear axle is 1250 kgs. Therefore, there is adequate load carrying
capacity in the tire at the lower pressure and there is no safety issue
resulting in underinflation of tires if a consumer uses the tire
pressure on the vehicle's label.
Paragraph S4.2.1.2 of FMVSS No. 110 requires that the vehicle
normal load on the tire shall not be greater than 94 percent of the
load rating at the vehicle manufacturer's recommended cold inflation
pressure for that tire. The vehicle normal load per tire is calculated
by distributing 2 occupants (for a 4-occupant vehicle), at the front
axle. Per FMVSS No. 110 definition of vehicle capacity weight, using 68
kgs per occupant results in a vehicle normal load per front tire of 534
kgs and a normal load per rear tire of 466 kgs.
BMW explained that they utilized a worst-case scenario by
calculating the vehicle's normal load using an automatic transmission
because it has a greater weight than the manual transmission, both of
which may be utilized in the subject vehicles. For the front tires, the
load rating is 605 kgs each, when multiplied by 94 percent, yields a
value of 568 kgs, which exceeds the previously stated 534 kg normal
vehicle load value. For the rear tires, the load rating is 700 kgs
each, when multiplied by 94 percent yields a value of 658 kgs, which
exceeds the previously stated 466 kg normal vehicle load value. NHTSA
concurs with utilizing a worst-case scenario approach to these
calculations as it is all inclusive of the affected vehicle population.
The purpose of the FMVSS No. 110 tire information label is to
convey accurate information for the vehicle to be operated in a safe
manner. As is the case with BMW in this petition, should a vehicle
operator require additional or corroborating information regarding the
vehicle's Tire and Loading Information Label, there are other
information sources that can be consulted to clearly identify--in this
case--the correct tire pressure. Should a vehicle operator ever
question what the correct tire pressure should be, they can consult the
vehicle's hardcopy owner's manual, the in-vehicle electronic owner's
manual, or contact BMW directly for further information in order to
verify the correct tire pressure.
NHTSA has previously granted petitions for inconsequential
noncompliance regarding FMVSS No. 110 related to vehicles for which the
vehicle placard contained tire size and tire pressure information which
did not match the tires equipped on the vehicle under similar
conditions.
VIII. NHTSA's Decision
NHTSA agrees with BMW that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety because there would be no
effect of the noncompliance on the operational safety of the subject
vehicles. No adverse impact on braking, steering or on-road stability
can result in driving the subject vehicles at the incorrect vehicle
capacity weight listed on the tire information placard. The vehicles
were designed to account for a larger vehicle capacity weight than the
weight stated on the tire information placard. Furthermore, the
affected vehicles can maintain the maximum vehicle loads even at the
lower manufacturer's recommended cold tire inflation pressure on the
tire information placard.
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA finds that BMW has met its
burden of persuasion that the FMVSS No. 110 noncompliance in the
affected vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, BMW's petition is granted and BMW is exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of, and a free remedy for, that
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to the subject vehicles that BMW no longer controlled at
the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve vehicle distributors and
dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or
introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their control after BMW notified them
that the subject noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)
Otto G. Matheke, III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-04662 Filed 3-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P