Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Update The Options Clearing Corporation's Operational Loss Fee Pursuant to Its Capital Management Policy, 11485-11488 [2023-03774]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 2023 / Notices telephone: 301–415–0624; email: Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301– 415–4737, or by email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in this document. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents, by appointment, at the NRC’s PDR, Room P1 B35, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. To make an appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415– 4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tilda Liu, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 404–997– 4730, email: Tilda.Liu@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 I. Background Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, (HDI) submitted a request to the NRC for an exemption from title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 72.212(a)(2), (b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), (B)(5)(i), (b)(11), and 72.214 for Pilgrim Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility (ISFSI) Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR), by letter dated August 29, 2022 (ADAMS Accession No. ML22241A112), as supplemented by letter dated December 9, 2022 (ADAMS Accession No. ML22343A165). In particular, the exemption request, if approved, would allow Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS) to deviate from the requirements in Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1014, Amendment No. 14, Appendix A, Technical Specifications (TS) for the HI–STORM 100 System, Section 5.4, ‘‘Radioactive Effluent Control Program,’’ subsection c related to the timing of submission for its ARERR. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 In its August 29, 2022 letter, HDI requested relief regarding the 60-day reporting requirement, so that the annual liquid and gaseous effluent release report for the PNPS ISFSI be incorporated into, and submitted with, the Pilgrim site ARERR on or before May 15, rather than prior to March 1, of each year to align with the submittal of its ARERR as required by PNPS Renewed Facility Operating License, DPR–35, PNPS Defueled Safety Analysis Report Section 5.0, ‘‘Administrative Controls,’’ Appendix B, Section B–5.6.3, ‘‘Radioactive Effluent Release Report.’’ II. Discussion The NRC issued an exemption (ADAMS Package Accession No. ML22356A070) to HDI for the PNPS ISFSI. The exemption granted provides relief from the 60-day requirement so that the annual effluent release report for the PNPS ISFSI may be submitted on or before May 15, rather than prior to March 1, of each year. The granted exemption only changes the due date and not the content of the information that the licensee would provide in the annual report. III. Conclusion Based on the staff’s evaluation, the NRC has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 72.7, ‘‘Specific Exemptions,’’ the exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest. Accordingly, the NRC granted HDI an exemption from 10 CFR 72.212(a)(2), (b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(5)(i), (b)(11), and 72.214. Dated: February 16, 2023. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Tilda Y. Liu, Acting Chief, Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch, Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2023–03695 Filed 2–22–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P PO 00000 11485 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–96948; File No. SR–OCC– 2023–001] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Update The Options Clearing Corporation’s Operational Loss Fee Pursuant to Its Capital Management Policy February 17, 2023. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on February 7, 2023, The Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by OCC. OCC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) 3 of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 4 thereunder so that the proposal was immediately effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The proposed rule change would revise OCC’s schedule of fees to update the maximum contingent Operational Loss Fee listed in OCC’s schedule of fees in accordance with OCC’s Capital Management Policy. Proposed changes to OCC’s schedule of fees are included as Exhibit 5 to File Number SR–OCC– 2023–001. Material proposed to be added to OCC’s schedule of fees as currently in effect is underlined and material proposed to be deleted is marked in strikethrough text. All capitalized terms not defined herein have the same meaning as set forth in the OCC By-Laws and Rules.5 II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, OCC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 5 OCC’s By-Laws and Rules can be found on OCC’s public website: https://www.theocc.com/ Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/ By-Laws-and-Rules. 2 17 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1 11486 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 2023 / Notices proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. OCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these statements. (A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change (1) Purpose The purpose of this proposed rule change is to revise OCC’s schedule of fees to update the maximum aggregate Operational Loss Fee that OCC would charge Clearing Members in equal shares in the unlikely event that OCC’s shareholders’ equity (‘‘Equity’’) falls below certain thresholds defined in OCC’s Capital Management Policy. The proposed fee change is designed to enable OCC to replenish capital to comply with Rule 17Ad–22(e)(15) under the Exchange Act, which requires OCC, in pertinent part, to ‘‘hold[ ] liquid net assets funded by equity to the greater of either (x) six months . . . current operating expenses, or (y) the amount determined by the board of directors to be sufficient to ensure a recovery or orderly wind-down of critical operations and service’’ 6 and ‘‘[m]aintain[ ] a viable plan, approved by the board of directors and updated at least annually, for raising additional Fees previously charged and not refunded.11 OCC calculates the maximum aggregate Operational Loss Fee based on the amount determined by the Board to be sufficient for a recovery or orderly wind-down of critical operations and services (‘‘RWD Amount’’),12 which is determined based on the assumptions in OCC’s Recovery and Orderly Wind-Down Plan (‘‘RWD Plan’’).13 In order to account for OCC’s tax liability for retaining the Operational Loss Fee as earnings, OCC may apply a tax gross-up to the RWD Amount (‘‘Adjusted RWD Amount’’) depending on whether the operational loss that caused OCC’s Equity to fall below the Trigger Event thresholds is tax deductible.14 The RWD Amount and, in turn, the Adjusted RWD Amount are determined annually based on OCC’s corporate budget, the assumptions articulated in the RWD Plan, and OCC’s projected effective tax rate.15 The current Operational Loss Fee listed in OCC’s schedule of fees is the Adjusted RWD Amount calculated based on OCC’s 2022 corporate budget. Budgeted operating expenses in 2023 are higher than the 2022 budgeted operating expenses. This proposed rule change would revise the maximum Operational Loss Fee to reflect the Adjusted RWD Amount based on OCC’s 2023 budget,16 as follows: Current fee schedule Proposed fee schedule $157,000,000.00 less the aggregate amount of Operational Loss Fees previously charged and not refunded as of the date calculated, divided by the number of Clearing Members at the time charged. $174,000,000.00 less the aggregate amount of Operational Loss Fees previously charged and not refunded as of the date calculated, divided by the number of Clearing Members at the time charged. Since the allocation of the Operational Loss Fee is a function of the number of Clearing Members at the time of the charge, the maximum Operational Loss Fee per Clearing Member is subject to fluctuation during the course of the year. However, if the proposed 6 See 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(15)(ii). 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(15)(iii). 8 See Exchange Act Release No. 88029 (Jan. 24, 2020), 85 FR 5500 (Jan. 30, 2020) (File No. SR– OCC–2019–007) (‘‘Order Approving OCC’s Capital Management Policy’’). 9 The Minimum Corporate Contribution is defined in the Capital Management Policy as the minimum level of OCC’s own funds maintained exclusively to cover credit losses or liquidity shortfalls, the level of which the OCC’s Board of Directors (‘‘Board’’) shall determine from time to time. See Exchange Act Release No. 92038 (May 27, 2021), 86 FR 29861, 29862 (June 3, 2021) (File No. SR–OCC–2021–003). For 2023, the Board has approved a Minimum Corporate Contribution of $69 million. When combined with the unvested funds held in respect of OCC’s Executive Deferred Compensation Plan contributed after January 1, 7 See lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 equity should its equity fall close to or below the amount required.’’ 7 The proposed rule change would implement a change in the maximum contingent Operational Loss Fee listed in OCC’s schedule of fees in accordance with OCC’s Capital Management Policy. OCC’s Capital Management Policy includes OCC’s replenishment plan.8 Pursuant to the Capital Management Policy, OCC would charge an Operational Loss Fee in equal shares to Clearing Members to raise additional capital should OCC’s Equity, less the Minimum Corporate Contribution,9 fall below certain defined thresholds relative to OCC’s Target Capital Requirement (i.e., a ‘‘Trigger Event’’), after first applying the unvested balance held in respect of OCC’s Executive Deferred Compensation Program.10 Based on the Board-approved Target Capital Requirement for 2023 of $303 million, a Trigger Event would occur if OCC’s Equity less the Minimum Corporate Contribution falls below $272.7 million at any time or below $303 million for a period of 90 consecutive calendar days. In the unlikely event those thresholds are breached, OCC would charge an Operational Loss Fee in an amount to raise Equity to 110% of OCC’s Target Capital Requirement, up to the maximum Operational Loss Fee identified in OCC’s schedule of fees less the amount of any Operational Loss VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 Operational Loss Fee were charged to 111 Clearing Members, the number of Clearing Members as of December 13, 2022, for example, the maximum Operational Loss Fee per Clearing Member would be $1,567,568. OCC would also update the schedule of fees to reflect the levels of Equity at which OCC would charge the Operational Loss Fee according to the thresholds defined in the Capital Management Policy, as well as the level of Equity at which OCC would limit the 2020 (the ‘‘EDCP Unvested Balance,’’ as defined in OCC’s Rules), OCC’s persistent minimum level of skin-in-the-game for 2023 would be at least $76 million, or 25% of OCC’s Target Capital Requirement. In addition to this minimum level, OCC would also contribute liquid net assets funded by equity greater than 110% of the Target Capital Requirement. See OCC Rule 1006(e). 10 See Exchange Act Release No. 91199 (Feb. 24, 2021), 86 FR 12237, 12241 (Mar. 2, 2021) (File No. SR–OCC–2021–003) (amending OCC’s replenishment plan, including the measurement for a Trigger Event, to account for the establishment of OCC’s persistent minimum skin-in-the-game). 11 See Order Approving OCC’s Capital Management Policy, 85 FR at 5503. 12 Id. 13 The RWD Plan states OCC’s basic assumptions concerning the resolution process, including assumptions about the duration of the resolution process, the cost of the resolution process, OCC’s capitalization through the resolution process, the maintenance of Critical Services and Critical Support Functions, as defined by the RWD Plan, and the retention of personnel and contractual relationships. See Exchange Act Release No. 83918 (Aug. 23, 2018), 83 FR 44091, 44094 (Aug. 29, 2018) (File No. SR–OCC–2017–021). 14 See Order Approving OCC’s Capital Management Policy, 85 FR at 5503. 15 See Order Approving OCC’s Capital Management Policy, 85 FR at 5501 n.20, 5503. 16 Confidential data and analysis evidencing the calculation of the Adjusted RWD Amount based on OCC’s 2023 corporate budget is included in Exhibit 3 to File Number SR–OCC–2023–001. PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 2023 / Notices Operational Loss Fee charged, based on OCC’s current Target Capital Requirement.17 Consistent with OCC’s approach to its persistent minimum skin-in-the-game, the threshold in the schedule of fees continues to reflect that consistent with OCC’s Capital Management Policy, the Trigger Event threshold is measured against Equity less the Minimum Corporate Contribution. OCC proposes the fee change to be effective immediately upon filing, because the Board approved the Adjusted RWD Amount upon which the Operational Loss Fee is based for 2023. Notwithstanding the immediate effectiveness, OCC would not make the fee change operative until after the time required to self-certify the proposed change with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’). lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 (2) Statutory Basis OCC believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act 18 and the rules and regulations thereunder. In particular, OCC believes that the proposed fee change is also consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act,19 which requires that the rules of a clearing agency provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its participants. OCC believes that the proposed fee change is reasonable because it is designed to replenish OCC’s Equity in the form of liquid net assets as a component of OCC’s plan to replenish its capital in the event that OCC’s Equity, less the Minimum Corporate Contribution reserved as the primary portion of OCC’s minimum persistent skin-in-the-game, falls close to or below its Target Capital Requirement so that OCC can continue to meet its obligations as a systemically important financial market utility (‘‘SIFMU’’) to Clearing Members and the general public should operational losses materialize (including through a recovery or orderly wind-down of critical operations and services) and thereby facilitate compliance with Rule 17Ad–22(e)(15)(iii).20 The maximum Operational Loss Fee is sized to ensure that OCC maintains sufficient liquid net assets to support its RWD Plan and imposes a contingent obligation on 17 OCC does not propose any change to the thresholds and limits defined in the Capital Management Policy. This proposed change merely conforms the disclosure in OCC’s schedule of fees to the current amounts based on the Boardapproved Target Capital Requirement of $303 million. 18 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. 19 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(D). 20 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(15)(iii). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 Clearing Members that is approximately the same amount as a Clearing Member’s contingent obligation for Clearing Fund assessments for a Clearing Member operating at the minimum Clearing Fund deposit.21 Therefore, OCC believes the proposed maximum Operational Loss Fee sized to OCC’s Adjusted RWD Amount is reasonable. OCC also believes that the proposed Operational Loss Fee would result in an equitable allocation of fees among its participants because it would be equally applicable to all Clearing Members. As the Commission has recognized, OCC’s designation as a SIFMU and its role as the sole covered clearing agency for all listed options contracts in the U.S. makes it an integral part of the national system for clearance and settlement, through which ‘‘Clearing Members, their customers, investors, and the markets as a whole derive significant benefit . . . regardless of their specific utilization of that system.’’ 22 Neither the SEC nor OCC has observed any correlation between measures of Clearing Member utilization or OCC’s benefit to Clearing Members 23 and its risk of operational loss.24 As a result, OCC believes that the proposed change to OCC’s fee schedule provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable fees in accordance with Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act.25 In addition, OCC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad–22(e)(15)(iii), which requires that OCC establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to identify, monitor, and manage OCC’s general business risk, including by maintaining a viable plan, approved by the Board and updated at least annually, for raising additional equity should its equity fall close to or below the amount 21 A Clearing Member operating at the minimum Clearing Fund deposit ($500,000) could be assessed up to an additional $1 million (the minimum deposit, assessed up to two times), for a total contingent obligation of $1.5 million. See OCC Rule 1006(h). 22 See Order Approving OCC’s Capital Management Policy, 85 FR at 5506. 23 Id. (‘‘The Commission is not aware of evidence demonstrating that those benefits are tied directly or positively correlated to an individual Clearing Member’s rate of utilization of OCC’s clearance and settlement services.’’) 24 Id. (rejecting an objection to the equal allocation of the proposed Operational Loss Fee based on the SEC’s regulatory experience and OCC’s analyses of Clearing Member utilization (e.g., contract volume) or credit risk (e.g., Clearing Fund size) and the various operational and general business risks that could trigger an Operational Loss Fee). To date, OCC has observed no correlation between Clearing Member utilization or credit risk and OCC’s potential risk of operational loss. See Confidential Exhibit 3. 25 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(D). PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11487 required under Rule 17Ad– 22(e)(15)(ii).26 While Rule 17Ad– 22(e)(15)(iii) does not by its terms specify the amount of additional equity a clearing agency’s plan for replenishment capital must be designed to raise, the SEC’s adopting release states that ‘‘a viable plan generally should enable the covered clearing agency to hold sufficient liquid net assets to achieve recovery or orderly wind-down.’’ 27 OCC sets the maximum Operational Loss Fee at an amount sufficient to raise, on a post-tax basis, the amount determined annually by the Board to be sufficient to ensure recovery or orderly wind-down pursuant to the RWD Plan.28 Therefore, OCC believes the proposed change to OCC’s schedule of fees is consistent with Rule 17Ad– 22(e)(15)(iii) and the guidance provided by the SEC in the adopting release. OCC also believes that the proposed fee change is consistent with Section 19(g)(1) of the Act,29 which, among other things, requires every selfregulatory organization to comply with its own rules. OCC filed its Capital Management Policy as a ‘‘proposed rule change’’ within the meaning of Section 19(b) of the Act,30 and Rule 19b–4 under the Act.31 The Capital Management Policy specifies that the maximum Operational Loss Fee shall be the Adjusted RWD Amount.32 Because the Adjusted RWD Amount will change annually based, in part, on OCC’s corporate budget, fee filings are necessary to ensure that the maximum Operational Loss Fee in OCC’s schedule of fees remains consistent with the amount identified in the Capital Management Policy. In addition, the amounts associated with the thresholds at which OCC would charge the Operational Loss Fee and the limit to the amount would change in accordance with the Capital Management Policy are determined based upon the level at which the Board sets OCC’s Target Capital Requirement. Consequently, OCC seeks to amend the amounts identified in the schedule of fees to 26 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(15)(iii). for Covered Clearing Agencies, Exchange Act Release No. 78961 (Sept. 28, 2016), 81 FR 70786, 70836 (Oct. 13, 2016) (File No. S7– 03–14). 28 See Order Approving OCC’s Capital Management Policy, 85 FR at 5510 (‘‘The Operational Loss Fee would be sized to the Adjusted RWD Amount, and therefore would be designed to provide OCC with at least enough capital either to continue as a going concern or to wind-down in an orderly fashion.’’) 29 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(1). 30 15 U.S.C. 78s(b). 31 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 32 Order Approving OCC’s Capital Management Policy, 85 FR at 5503. 27 Standards E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1 11488 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 36 / Thursday, February 23, 2023 / Notices reflect OCC’s current Target Capital Requirement and OCC’s current Capital Management Policy, which reflects the establishment of the Minimum Corporate Contribution.33 Therefore, OCC believes that the proposed change to OCC’s fee schedule is consistent with Section 19(g)(1) of the Act. (B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on Burden on Competition Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the Act 34 requires that the rules of a clearing agency not impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. OCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would have any impact or impose a burden on competition. Although the proposed Operational Loss Fee affects Clearing Members, their customers, and the markets that OCC serves, OCC believes that the proposed increase in the Operational Loss Fee would not disadvantage or favor any particular user of OCC’s services in relationship to another user because the proposed Operational Loss Fee would apply equally to all Clearing Members. In addition, OCC does not believe that the proposed Operational Loss Fee imposes a significant burden on smaller firms because the maximum Operational Loss Fee imposes a contingent obligation on Clearing Members that is approximately the same amount as a Clearing Member’s contingent obligation for Clearing Fund assessments for a Clearing Member operating at the minimum Clearing Fund deposit.35 Accordingly, OCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would have any impact or impose a burden on competition. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 (C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with respect to the proposed rule change and none have been received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) 36 of the Act, and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,37 the proposed rule change is filed for immediate effectiveness as it constitutes a change in fees charged to 33 See supra notes 9 and 10, and accompanying text. 34 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(I). 35 See supra note 21. 36 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 37 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Feb 22, 2023 OCC Clearing Members. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposal shall not take effect until all regulatory actions required with respect to the proposal are completed.38 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– OCC–2023–001 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–OCC–2023–001. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such 38 Notwithstanding its immediate effectiveness, implementation of this rule change will be delayed until this change is deemed certified under CFTC Regulation 40.6. Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC’s website at https://www.theocc.com/CompanyInformation/Documents-and-Archives/ By-Laws-and-Rules. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–OCC–2023–001 and should be submitted on or before March 16, 2023. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.39 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2023–03774 Filed 2–22–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–96943; File No. SR–ICEEU– 2023–006] Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments Part Q of its White Sugar Delivery Procedures February 16, 2023. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on February 6, 2023, ICE Clear Europe Limited (‘‘ICE Clear Europe’’ or the ‘‘Clearing House’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule changes described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by ICE Clear Europe. ICE Clear Europe filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(4)(ii) thereunder,4 such that the proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 39 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4). 1 15 E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11485-11488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03774]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96948; File No. SR-OCC-2023-001]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To 
Update The Options Clearing Corporation's Operational Loss Fee Pursuant 
to Its Capital Management Policy

February 17, 2023.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Exchange Act'' or ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice 
is hereby given that on February 7, 2023, The Options Clearing 
Corporation (``OCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by 
OCC. OCC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \3\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \4\ thereunder so 
that the proposal was immediately effective upon filing with the 
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the 
Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change would revise OCC's schedule of fees to 
update the maximum contingent Operational Loss Fee listed in OCC's 
schedule of fees in accordance with OCC's Capital Management Policy. 
Proposed changes to OCC's schedule of fees are included as Exhibit 5 to 
File Number SR-OCC-2023-001. Material proposed to be added to OCC's 
schedule of fees as currently in effect is underlined and material 
proposed to be deleted is marked in strikethrough text. All capitalized 
terms not defined herein have the same meaning as set forth in the OCC 
By-Laws and Rules.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ OCC's By-Laws and Rules can be found on OCC's public 
website: https://www.theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/By-Laws-and-Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, OCC included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the

[[Page 11486]]

proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. OCC has prepared summaries, set 
forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant 
aspects of these statements.

(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

(1) Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to revise OCC's 
schedule of fees to update the maximum aggregate Operational Loss Fee 
that OCC would charge Clearing Members in equal shares in the unlikely 
event that OCC's shareholders' equity (``Equity'') falls below certain 
thresholds defined in OCC's Capital Management Policy.
    The proposed fee change is designed to enable OCC to replenish 
capital to comply with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(15) under the Exchange Act, 
which requires OCC, in pertinent part, to ``hold[ ] liquid net assets 
funded by equity to the greater of either (x) six months . . . current 
operating expenses, or (y) the amount determined by the board of 
directors to be sufficient to ensure a recovery or orderly wind-down of 
critical operations and service'' \6\ and ``[m]aintain[ ] a viable 
plan, approved by the board of directors and updated at least annually, 
for raising additional equity should its equity fall close to or below 
the amount required.'' \7\ The proposed rule change would implement a 
change in the maximum contingent Operational Loss Fee listed in OCC's 
schedule of fees in accordance with OCC's Capital Management Policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(15)(ii).
    \7\ See 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(15)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC's Capital Management Policy includes OCC's replenishment 
plan.\8\ Pursuant to the Capital Management Policy, OCC would charge an 
Operational Loss Fee in equal shares to Clearing Members to raise 
additional capital should OCC's Equity, less the Minimum Corporate 
Contribution,\9\ fall below certain defined thresholds relative to 
OCC's Target Capital Requirement (i.e., a ``Trigger Event''), after 
first applying the unvested balance held in respect of OCC's Executive 
Deferred Compensation Program.\10\ Based on the Board-approved Target 
Capital Requirement for 2023 of $303 million, a Trigger Event would 
occur if OCC's Equity less the Minimum Corporate Contribution falls 
below $272.7 million at any time or below $303 million for a period of 
90 consecutive calendar days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Exchange Act Release No. 88029 (Jan. 24, 2020), 85 FR 
5500 (Jan. 30, 2020) (File No. SR-OCC-2019-007) (``Order Approving 
OCC's Capital Management Policy'').
    \9\ The Minimum Corporate Contribution is defined in the Capital 
Management Policy as the minimum level of OCC's own funds maintained 
exclusively to cover credit losses or liquidity shortfalls, the 
level of which the OCC's Board of Directors (``Board'') shall 
determine from time to time. See Exchange Act Release No. 92038 (May 
27, 2021), 86 FR 29861, 29862 (June 3, 2021) (File No. SR-OCC-2021-
003). For 2023, the Board has approved a Minimum Corporate 
Contribution of $69 million. When combined with the unvested funds 
held in respect of OCC's Executive Deferred Compensation Plan 
contributed after January 1, 2020 (the ``EDCP Unvested Balance,'' as 
defined in OCC's Rules), OCC's persistent minimum level of skin-in-
the-game for 2023 would be at least $76 million, or 25% of OCC's 
Target Capital Requirement. In addition to this minimum level, OCC 
would also contribute liquid net assets funded by equity greater 
than 110% of the Target Capital Requirement. See OCC Rule 1006(e).
    \10\ See Exchange Act Release No. 91199 (Feb. 24, 2021), 86 FR 
12237, 12241 (Mar. 2, 2021) (File No. SR-OCC-2021-003) (amending 
OCC's replenishment plan, including the measurement for a Trigger 
Event, to account for the establishment of OCC's persistent minimum 
skin-in-the-game).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the unlikely event those thresholds are breached, OCC would 
charge an Operational Loss Fee in an amount to raise Equity to 110% of 
OCC's Target Capital Requirement, up to the maximum Operational Loss 
Fee identified in OCC's schedule of fees less the amount of any 
Operational Loss Fees previously charged and not refunded.\11\ OCC 
calculates the maximum aggregate Operational Loss Fee based on the 
amount determined by the Board to be sufficient for a recovery or 
orderly wind-down of critical operations and services (``RWD 
Amount''),\12\ which is determined based on the assumptions in OCC's 
Recovery and Orderly Wind-Down Plan (``RWD Plan'').\13\ In order to 
account for OCC's tax liability for retaining the Operational Loss Fee 
as earnings, OCC may apply a tax gross-up to the RWD Amount (``Adjusted 
RWD Amount'') depending on whether the operational loss that caused 
OCC's Equity to fall below the Trigger Event thresholds is tax 
deductible.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Order Approving OCC's Capital Management Policy, 85 FR 
at 5503.
    \12\ Id.
    \13\ The RWD Plan states OCC's basic assumptions concerning the 
resolution process, including assumptions about the duration of the 
resolution process, the cost of the resolution process, OCC's 
capitalization through the resolution process, the maintenance of 
Critical Services and Critical Support Functions, as defined by the 
RWD Plan, and the retention of personnel and contractual 
relationships. See Exchange Act Release No. 83918 (Aug. 23, 2018), 
83 FR 44091, 44094 (Aug. 29, 2018) (File No. SR-OCC-2017-021).
    \14\ See Order Approving OCC's Capital Management Policy, 85 FR 
at 5503.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The RWD Amount and, in turn, the Adjusted RWD Amount are determined 
annually based on OCC's corporate budget, the assumptions articulated 
in the RWD Plan, and OCC's projected effective tax rate.\15\ The 
current Operational Loss Fee listed in OCC's schedule of fees is the 
Adjusted RWD Amount calculated based on OCC's 2022 corporate budget. 
Budgeted operating expenses in 2023 are higher than the 2022 budgeted 
operating expenses. This proposed rule change would revise the maximum 
Operational Loss Fee to reflect the Adjusted RWD Amount based on OCC's 
2023 budget,\16\ as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Order Approving OCC's Capital Management Policy, 85 FR 
at 5501 n.20, 5503.
    \16\ Confidential data and analysis evidencing the calculation 
of the Adjusted RWD Amount based on OCC's 2023 corporate budget is 
included in Exhibit 3 to File Number SR-OCC-2023-001.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Current fee schedule                Proposed fee schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$157,000,000.00 less the aggregate       $174,000,000.00 less the
 amount of Operational Loss Fees          aggregate amount of
 previously charged and not refunded as   Operational Loss Fees
 of the date calculated, divided by the   previously charged and not
 number of Clearing Members at the time   refunded as of the date
 charged.                                 calculated, divided by the
                                          number of Clearing Members at
                                          the time charged.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the allocation of the Operational Loss Fee is a function of 
the number of Clearing Members at the time of the charge, the maximum 
Operational Loss Fee per Clearing Member is subject to fluctuation 
during the course of the year. However, if the proposed Operational 
Loss Fee were charged to 111 Clearing Members, the number of Clearing 
Members as of December 13, 2022, for example, the maximum Operational 
Loss Fee per Clearing Member would be $1,567,568.
    OCC would also update the schedule of fees to reflect the levels of 
Equity at which OCC would charge the Operational Loss Fee according to 
the thresholds defined in the Capital Management Policy, as well as the 
level of Equity at which OCC would limit the

[[Page 11487]]

Operational Loss Fee charged, based on OCC's current Target Capital 
Requirement.\17\ Consistent with OCC's approach to its persistent 
minimum skin-in-the-game, the threshold in the schedule of fees 
continues to reflect that consistent with OCC's Capital Management 
Policy, the Trigger Event threshold is measured against Equity less the 
Minimum Corporate Contribution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ OCC does not propose any change to the thresholds and 
limits defined in the Capital Management Policy. This proposed 
change merely conforms the disclosure in OCC's schedule of fees to 
the current amounts based on the Board-approved Target Capital 
Requirement of $303 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC proposes the fee change to be effective immediately upon 
filing, because the Board approved the Adjusted RWD Amount upon which 
the Operational Loss Fee is based for 2023. Notwithstanding the 
immediate effectiveness, OCC would not make the fee change operative 
until after the time required to self-certify the proposed change with 
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'').
(2) Statutory Basis
    OCC believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act 
\18\ and the rules and regulations thereunder. In particular, OCC 
believes that the proposed fee change is also consistent with Section 
17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act,\19\ which requires that the rules of a 
clearing agency provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable 
dues, fees, and other charges among its participants. OCC believes that 
the proposed fee change is reasonable because it is designed to 
replenish OCC's Equity in the form of liquid net assets as a component 
of OCC's plan to replenish its capital in the event that OCC's Equity, 
less the Minimum Corporate Contribution reserved as the primary portion 
of OCC's minimum persistent skin-in-the-game, falls close to or below 
its Target Capital Requirement so that OCC can continue to meet its 
obligations as a systemically important financial market utility 
(``SIFMU'') to Clearing Members and the general public should 
operational losses materialize (including through a recovery or orderly 
wind-down of critical operations and services) and thereby facilitate 
compliance with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(15)(iii).\20\ The maximum Operational 
Loss Fee is sized to ensure that OCC maintains sufficient liquid net 
assets to support its RWD Plan and imposes a contingent obligation on 
Clearing Members that is approximately the same amount as a Clearing 
Member's contingent obligation for Clearing Fund assessments for a 
Clearing Member operating at the minimum Clearing Fund deposit.\21\ 
Therefore, OCC believes the proposed maximum Operational Loss Fee sized 
to OCC's Adjusted RWD Amount is reasonable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(D).
    \20\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(15)(iii).
    \21\ A Clearing Member operating at the minimum Clearing Fund 
deposit ($500,000) could be assessed up to an additional $1 million 
(the minimum deposit, assessed up to two times), for a total 
contingent obligation of $1.5 million. See OCC Rule 1006(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC also believes that the proposed Operational Loss Fee would 
result in an equitable allocation of fees among its participants 
because it would be equally applicable to all Clearing Members. As the 
Commission has recognized, OCC's designation as a SIFMU and its role as 
the sole covered clearing agency for all listed options contracts in 
the U.S. makes it an integral part of the national system for clearance 
and settlement, through which ``Clearing Members, their customers, 
investors, and the markets as a whole derive significant benefit . . . 
regardless of their specific utilization of that system.'' \22\ Neither 
the SEC nor OCC has observed any correlation between measures of 
Clearing Member utilization or OCC's benefit to Clearing Members \23\ 
and its risk of operational loss.\24\ As a result, OCC believes that 
the proposed change to OCC's fee schedule provides for the equitable 
allocation of reasonable fees in accordance with Section 17A(b)(3)(D) 
of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Order Approving OCC's Capital Management Policy, 85 FR 
at 5506.
    \23\ Id. (``The Commission is not aware of evidence 
demonstrating that those benefits are tied directly or positively 
correlated to an individual Clearing Member's rate of utilization of 
OCC's clearance and settlement services.'')
    \24\ Id. (rejecting an objection to the equal allocation of the 
proposed Operational Loss Fee based on the SEC's regulatory 
experience and OCC's analyses of Clearing Member utilization (e.g., 
contract volume) or credit risk (e.g., Clearing Fund size) and the 
various operational and general business risks that could trigger an 
Operational Loss Fee). To date, OCC has observed no correlation 
between Clearing Member utilization or credit risk and OCC's 
potential risk of operational loss. See Confidential Exhibit 3.
    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, OCC believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(15)(iii), which requires that OCC 
establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and 
procedures reasonably designed to identify, monitor, and manage OCC's 
general business risk, including by maintaining a viable plan, approved 
by the Board and updated at least annually, for raising additional 
equity should its equity fall close to or below the amount required 
under Rule 17Ad-22(e)(15)(ii).\26\ While Rule 17Ad-22(e)(15)(iii) does 
not by its terms specify the amount of additional equity a clearing 
agency's plan for replenishment capital must be designed to raise, the 
SEC's adopting release states that ``a viable plan generally should 
enable the covered clearing agency to hold sufficient liquid net assets 
to achieve recovery or orderly wind-down.'' \27\ OCC sets the maximum 
Operational Loss Fee at an amount sufficient to raise, on a post-tax 
basis, the amount determined annually by the Board to be sufficient to 
ensure recovery or orderly wind-down pursuant to the RWD Plan.\28\ 
Therefore, OCC believes the proposed change to OCC's schedule of fees 
is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(15)(iii) and the guidance provided 
by the SEC in the adopting release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(15)(iii).
    \27\ Standards for Covered Clearing Agencies, Exchange Act 
Release No. 78961 (Sept. 28, 2016), 81 FR 70786, 70836 (Oct. 13, 
2016) (File No. S7-03-14).
    \28\ See Order Approving OCC's Capital Management Policy, 85 FR 
at 5510 (``The Operational Loss Fee would be sized to the Adjusted 
RWD Amount, and therefore would be designed to provide OCC with at 
least enough capital either to continue as a going concern or to 
wind-down in an orderly fashion.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OCC also believes that the proposed fee change is consistent with 
Section 19(g)(1) of the Act,\29\ which, among other things, requires 
every self-regulatory organization to comply with its own rules. OCC 
filed its Capital Management Policy as a ``proposed rule change'' 
within the meaning of Section 19(b) of the Act,\30\ and Rule 19b-4 
under the Act.\31\ The Capital Management Policy specifies that the 
maximum Operational Loss Fee shall be the Adjusted RWD Amount.\32\ 
Because the Adjusted RWD Amount will change annually based, in part, on 
OCC's corporate budget, fee filings are necessary to ensure that the 
maximum Operational Loss Fee in OCC's schedule of fees remains 
consistent with the amount identified in the Capital Management Policy. 
In addition, the amounts associated with the thresholds at which OCC 
would charge the Operational Loss Fee and the limit to the amount would 
change in accordance with the Capital Management Policy are determined 
based upon the level at which the Board sets OCC's Target Capital 
Requirement. Consequently, OCC seeks to amend the amounts identified in 
the schedule of fees to

[[Page 11488]]

reflect OCC's current Target Capital Requirement and OCC's current 
Capital Management Policy, which reflects the establishment of the 
Minimum Corporate Contribution.\33\ Therefore, OCC believes that the 
proposed change to OCC's fee schedule is consistent with Section 
19(g)(1) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(1).
    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
    \31\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \32\ Order Approving OCC's Capital Management Policy, 85 FR at 
5503.
    \33\ See supra notes 9 and 10, and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the Act \34\ requires that the rules of a 
clearing agency not impose any burden on competition not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. OCC does not 
believe that the proposed rule change would have any impact or impose a 
burden on competition. Although the proposed Operational Loss Fee 
affects Clearing Members, their customers, and the markets that OCC 
serves, OCC believes that the proposed increase in the Operational Loss 
Fee would not disadvantage or favor any particular user of OCC's 
services in relationship to another user because the proposed 
Operational Loss Fee would apply equally to all Clearing Members. In 
addition, OCC does not believe that the proposed Operational Loss Fee 
imposes a significant burden on smaller firms because the maximum 
Operational Loss Fee imposes a contingent obligation on Clearing 
Members that is approximately the same amount as a Clearing Member's 
contingent obligation for Clearing Fund assessments for a Clearing 
Member operating at the minimum Clearing Fund deposit.\35\ Accordingly, 
OCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would have any 
impact or impose a burden on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(I).
    \35\ See supra note 21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change 
Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with 
respect to the proposed rule change and none have been received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \36\ of the Act, and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) thereunder,\37\ the proposed rule change is filed for immediate 
effectiveness as it constitutes a change in fees charged to OCC 
Clearing Members. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the 
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend 
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is 
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of 
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The 
proposal shall not take effect until all regulatory actions required 
with respect to the proposal are completed.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \37\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
    \38\ Notwithstanding its immediate effectiveness, implementation 
of this rule change will be delayed until this change is deemed 
certified under CFTC Regulation 40.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-OCC-2023-001 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Vanessa Countryman, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2023-001. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC's website at 
https://www.theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/By-Laws-and-Rules.
    All comments received will be posted without change. Persons 
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit 
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2023-001 and 
should be submitted on or before March 16, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-03774 Filed 2-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.