Request for Information Regarding First Amendment and Free Inquiry Related Grant Conditions, 10881-10883 [2023-03671]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2023 / Notices
of decision (ROD) was signed on
September 18, 2018, initiating the next
phase of the study, Preconstruction
Engineering and Design (PED). In 2020,
an Engineering Documentation Report
(EDR) provided the technical basis for
modifications necessary to the
Authorized Project. Subsequent analysis
found that the modifications in the 2020
EDR were not cost effective and lacked
the economic justification necessary for
continued federal involvement.
Acknowledging the need to reduce the
risk to life, safety and economic
damages from flooding throughout the
Ala Wai Watershed in Oahu, Hawaii,
the Corps is currently reevaluating the
previously completed Ala Wai Canal
Flood Risk Management Study in a
GRR, using current planning criteria and
policies. Since the GRR is reevaluating
alternatives and could result in a new
recommendation, NEPA documentation
for the Ala Wai Canal Flood Risk
Management Project will be updated.
2. Proposed Action: The project is
undergoing a GRR to (1) redefine the
flood problems and risks in the Ala Wai
Watershed by updating hydrology,
physical, biological, and socioeconomic
conditions; (2) reevaluate alternatives
for reducing flood damages in the area;
and (3) reaffirm the Federal interest by
recommending a plan that is
economically feasible. The results of
this study will be presented in the GRR/
SEIS. The formulation and evaluation of
alternatives, benefits and costs, and
implementation requirements will be
presented in the GRR/SEIS.
3. Alternatives: A number of project
alternatives will be evaluated in the
GRR/SEIS. In addition to the No Action
alternative, other potential alternatives
to reduce flood damages include a
combination of the following
components: Makiki District Park
detention basin, Manoa Valley District
Park detention basin, Ala Wai Golf
Course detention basin, Kaimuki High
School berm/floodwall, Kanaha
floodwall, Woodlawn Bridge floodwall,
Koali Road floodwall, and Ala Wai
Canal floodwall.
4. Scoping/Public Participation: The
GRR/SEIS will be coordinated with
Federal, State, and local government
agencies; Native Hawaiian
organizations; local stakeholders;
special interest groups; and any other
interested individuals and
organizations. A 30-day scoping period
for Federal, State, local agencies, and
non-governmental organizations was
held between August 9, 2021, through
September 9, 2021, when the
environmental document accompanying
the GRR was anticipated to be a
supplemental environmental
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:42 Feb 21, 2023
Jkt 259001
assessment. The Corps held a public
meeting to discuss the scope of the draft
GRR and accompanying environmental
documentation on November 10 and
November 13, 2021. The virtual meeting
dates and times were advertised in
advance on the City and County of
Honolulu’s Ala Wai Study Flood Risk
Management website (https://
www.honolulu.gov/alawai/publicengagement.html). The purpose of these
meetings was to involve local
stakeholders and the public early in the
study process. The meetings collected
public input regarding the study scope,
historic and current problems, and
potential opportunities. Based on public
feedback, additional virtual workshops/
meetings were incorporated into the
public engagement strategy for the
study. To date, additional public
engagement opportunities have
occurred via virtual and/or in-person
workshops/meetings held on January
20, 2022, April 1, 2022, April 8, 2022,
April 14, 2022, April 22, 2022, July 26,
2022, July 28, 2022, and December 13,
2022.
Based on feedback from the public
and the non-Federal sponsor, the
environmental document being
prepared to accompany the GRR is now
anticipated to be a SEIS. Therefore, this
notice of intent to prepare a GRR/SEIS
is initiating a new 30-day public
scoping period. Due to public
workshops and meetings that have
already occurred, no additional scoping
meetings are planned at this time. All
public comments received to date
regarding the GRR/SEIS, either verbally
or in writing, during prior meetings,
workshops, and scoping periods will be
considered by the Corps in the GRR/
SEIS.
5. Anticipated Impacts, Permits, and
Authorization: The GRR/SEIS will
analyze the full range of impacts, both
beneficial and negative, of the
alternatives. Potentially significant
issues to be analyzed include impacts to
water quality, biological resources,
endangered and threatened species and
their habitats, cultural resources, and
visual resources. Other impacts that will
be analyzed include geology, seismicity,
and soils; surface water resources;
hydrology and hydraulics; land use;
recreation; hazardous and toxic waste;
air quality; noise; traffic and
transportation; public health and safety;
public services and utilities;
socioeconomics; and environmental
justice. Anticipated permits and
authorizations include water quality
certification and Coastal Zone
Consistency Determination. In addition,
many other Federal, State, and local
authorizations will be required for the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10881
Project. Applicable Federal laws include
NEPA, the Endangered Species Act,
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act,
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
Marine Mammal Protection Act, Coastal
Zone Management Act, National
Historic Preservation Act, and the Clean
Water Act.
6. Public Comment Availability:
Comments received in response to this
solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record. Comments
submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, be advised that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
7. Study Schedule: The Draft GRR/
SEIS is currently estimated to be
available to the public in Summer 2023,
with a 45-day public review and
comment period following release of the
draft document.
Kimberly A. Peeples,
Brigadier General, U.S. Army, Commander,
Great Lakes and Ohio River Division.
[FR Doc. 2023–03622 Filed 2–21–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket ID ED—2023—OPE—0029]
Request for Information Regarding
First Amendment and Free Inquiry
Related Grant Conditions
Office of Postsecondary
Education, U.S. Department of
Education
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Education (Department) is requesting
information in the form of written
comments that may include
information, research, and other input
from the public on how regulations
adding material conditions relating to
First Amendment freedoms and free
inquiry to Department grants have
affected or are reasonably expected to
affect decisions surrounding First
Amendment and free speech-related
litigation in Federal and State court and
institutional policies on freedom of
speech. The Office of Postsecondary
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10882
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2023 / Notices
Education solicits these comments to
inform its review of the current
regulations and its implementation of
applicable grant programs.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before March 24, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
submitted via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at regulations.gov. However, if
you require an accommodation or
cannot otherwise submit your
comments via regulations.gov, please
contact the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. The Department will not
accept comments by fax or by email, or
comments submitted after the comment
period closes. To ensure that the
Department does not receive duplicate
copies, please submit your comments
only once. Additionally, please include
the Docket ID at the top of your
comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov to submit your
comments electronically. Information
on sing Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing agency
documents, submitting comments, and
viewing the docket, is available on the
site under ‘‘FAQ.’’
Privacy Note: The Department’s
policy is to make all comments received
from members of the public available for
public viewing in their entirety on the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to
include in their comments only
information that they wish to make
publicly available.
This is a request for information (RFI)
only. This RFI is not a request for
proposals (RFP) or a promise to issue an
RFP or a notice of proposed rulemaking.
This RFI does not commit the
Department to contract for any supply
or service whatsoever. Further, we are
not seeking proposals and will not
accept unsolicited proposals. The
Department will not pay for any
information or administrative costs that
you may incur in responding to this RFI.
The documents and information
submitted in response to this RFI
become the property of the U.S.
Government and will not be returned.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley Clark, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW,
Room 2C185, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 453–7977. Email:
ashley.clark@ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability and wish to
access telecommunications relay
services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:42 Feb 21, 2023
Jkt 259001
I. Background
In 2020, the Department proposed and
issued final regulations to add material
conditions relating to First Amendment
freedoms and free inquiry to certain
Department grants. These regulations,
commonly referred to as the ‘‘Free
Inquiry Rule,’’ added provisions related
to free inquiry (§ 75.500(b) and (c) for
Direct Grant Programs, and § 76.500(b)
and (c) for State-Administered Formula
Grant Programs), making it a material
condition of these Department grants
that public institutions of higher
education (IHEs) that receive these
grants comply with the First
Amendment and private institutions
that receive grants from the Department
follow their stated institutional policies
on freedom of speech, including
academic freedom. As acknowledged in
the 2020 final rule, public IHEs are
already legally required to comply with
the First Amendment and private IHEs
are required to comply with their stated
policies on freedom of speech. The
intended effect of making compliance a
material condition of receiving
Department grants is to encourage IHEs
to foster environments that promote
open, intellectually engaging, and
diverse debate.
The 2020 final rule states that an IHE
will be determined to have violated the
grant conditions in §§ 75.500(b) and (c)
and 76.500(b) and (c) only if a State or
Federal court issues a final, non-default
judgment against a public IHE for
violating the First Amendment or
against a private IHE for violating stated
institutional policies. In the 2020 NPRM
and 2020 final rule, the Department
stated that we believed State and
Federal courts are the appropriate
arbiters of alleged free speech
violations. Under the 2020 final rule,
the Department’s role is deciding
whether and to what extent to impose
additional penalties where such court
judgments have been rendered,
including, but not limited to,
withholding Federal grant funding. The
preamble to the 2020 final rule stated
that if a court issues such a judgment
against a public IHE for violating the
First Amendment or a private IHE for
violating stated institutional policies,
the institution must submit to the
Secretary a copy of the judgment within
45 days. The Department would then
consider such a grantee to be in
violation of a material condition and
could pursue available remedies for
noncompliance.
Furthermore, the 2020 final rule
added a third provision (§ 75.500(d) for
Direct Grant Programs and § 76.500(d)
for State-Administered Formula Grant
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Programs) prohibiting public IHEs from
denying to a religious student
organization at the public institution
any right, benefit, or privilege that is
otherwise afforded to other student
organizations at the institution because
of the religious student organization’s
beliefs, practices, policies, speech,
membership standards, or leadership
standards informed by sincerely held
religious beliefs. That provision is not
part of this request for information and
is instead being addressed separately in
a notice of proposed rulemaking (see
Docket ID ED–2022–OPE–0157).
II. Review of 34 CFR 75.500 and 76.500,
Paragraphs (b) and (c)
On August 19, 2021, the Department
issued a blog post announcing that we
were conducting a review of these
regulations while keeping in mind the
importance of several key elements,
including First Amendment protections,
nondiscrimination requirements, and
the promotion of inclusive learning
environments for all students.1 We
stated in our blog post that the First
Amendment requires that public
colleges and universities not infringe
upon students’ rights to engage in
protected free speech and religious
exercise and emphasized our long-held
and continuing view that ‘‘[p]rotecting
First Amendment freedoms on public
university and college campuses is
essential.’’ The Department further
recognized that IHEs, their students, and
the courts have historically been
responsible for resolving disputes
relating to these complex matters where
these important principles intersect.
As part of the review, the Department
conducted outreach and held meetings
with higher education and institutional
stakeholders, including organizations
representing minority-serving
institutions and other under-resourced
institutions; faith-based organizations,
including organizations representing
religious IHEs; and organizations that
advocate for civil rights and civil
liberties. The purpose of the meetings
was to hear from impacted groups that
had diverging perspectives in their
comments on the proposed provisions
in the 2020 NPRM. Some institutional
stakeholders raised on-going concerns
that the provisions added by the 2020
final rule in paragraphs (b) and (c) of 34
CFR 75.500 and 76.500 unnecessarily go
beyond what is required by the courts,
encourage campus community members
to pursue litigation more frequently, and
1 Cooper, Michelle Asha. ‘‘Update on the Free
Inquiry Rule,’’ Department of Education Homeroom
Blog (Aug. 19, 2021), https://blog.ed.gov/2021/08/
update-on-the-free-inquiry-rule/.
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
undermine existing campus processes.
Stakeholders also stated that these
provisions could increase institutional
costs as a result of increased litigation
and prompt institutions to change their
approach to litigation, such as being
more likely to settle. In the case of
private institutions, the Department has
heard concerns that the regulations may
incentivize private colleges to limit,
eliminate, or reconsider their policies
on free speech for fear of losing grant
funds. Some stakeholders indicated
support for these provisions and stated
that the regulation helps secure crucial
civil liberties under the First
Amendment.
III. Solicitation of Comments: Impact of
34 CFR 75.500 and 76.500, Paragraphs
(b) and (c)
The Biden-Harris Administration
deeply values the First Amendment,
including its guarantees of free speech
and free exercise. The Department is
seeking input from the public on how
the regulations have affected or are
reasonably expected to affect decisions
surrounding First Amendment and free
speech-related litigation in Federal and
State court and institutional policies on
freedom of speech. The Department is
interested in this public input to inform
its review of the current regulations and
its implementation of applicable grant
programs. This effort is separate from
any ongoing regulatory work. The
deadline for these submissions is March
24, 2023.
The Department encourages
comments from impacted institutions of
higher education; researchers,
academics, policy experts, and other
individuals familiar with First
Amendment rights and institutional
policies; organizations that work on
First Amendment issues, including
those that work directly with
institutions and students; students and
other members of the public.
The Department seeks responses to
the specific questions below, as well as
the general concepts and topics
identified as they relate to First
Amendment rights and free speech
policies on campus.
The Department invites comments as
to:
1. Whether and how the current
regulations have affected or are
reasonably expected to affect decisions
surrounding First Amendment and free
speech-related litigation in Federal and
State court;
2. How these regulations have affected
or are reasonably expected to affect
public IHEs’ approach to designing
institutional policies related to First
Amendment protections, including on-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:42 Feb 21, 2023
Jkt 259001
campuses processes used to address
alleged free speech and academic
freedom violations;
3. How these regulations have affected
or are reasonably expected to affect
private IHEs’ approach to designing
institutional policies related to free
speech and academic freedom,
including on-campuses processes used
to address alleged free speech and
academic freedom violations;
4. Whether and how these grant
conditions have provided additional
protections of First Amendment rights
in the case of public colleges, or
promotion of free speech and free
inquiry policies in the case of private
institutions;
5. Whether these regulations affect or
could be expected to affect how
aggrieved campus community members
seek resolution to alleged free speech
and academic freedom policy violations;
6. Whether these regulations have
resulted in additional quantifiable costs
beyond what was considered in the
2020 final rule;
7. Any other information that the
public believes would inform the
Department’s understanding of the
impact of these regulations.
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document in an accessible format.
The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10883
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Nasser H. Paydar,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Postsecondary
Education.
[FR Doc. 2023–03671 Filed 2–21–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2023–SCC–0034]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request;
Measuring Educational Gain in the
National Reporting System for Adult
Education
Office of Career, Technical, and
Adult Education (OCTAE), Department
of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, the Department is proposing an
extension without change of a currently
approved information collection request
(ICR).
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before April 24,
2023.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2023–SCC–0034. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
If the regulations.gov site is not
available to the public for any reason,
the Department will temporarily accept
comments at ICDocketMgr@ed.gov.
Please include the docket ID number
and the title of the information
collection request when requesting
documents or submitting comments.
Please note that comments submitted
after the comment period will not be
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Manager of the
Strategic Collections and Clearance
Governance and Strategy Division, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Ave SW, LBJ, Room 6W203,
Washington, DC 20202–8240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact John LeMaster,
(202) 245–6218.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10881-10883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03671]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket ID ED--2023--OPE--0029]
Request for Information Regarding First Amendment and Free
Inquiry Related Grant Conditions
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Education (Department) is requesting
information in the form of written comments that may include
information, research, and other input from the public on how
regulations adding material conditions relating to First Amendment
freedoms and free inquiry to Department grants have affected or are
reasonably expected to affect decisions surrounding First Amendment and
free speech-related litigation in Federal and State court and
institutional policies on freedom of speech. The Office of
Postsecondary
[[Page 10882]]
Education solicits these comments to inform its review of the current
regulations and its implementation of applicable grant programs.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before March 24, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at regulations.gov. However, if you require an accommodation or
cannot otherwise submit your comments via regulations.gov, please
contact the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. The Department will not accept comments by fax or by email, or
comments submitted after the comment period closes. To ensure that the
Department does not receive duplicate copies, please submit your
comments only once. Additionally, please include the Docket ID at the
top of your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov to submit
your comments electronically. Information on sing Regulations.gov,
including instructions for accessing agency documents, submitting
comments, and viewing the docket, is available on the site under
``FAQ.''
Privacy Note: The Department's policy is to make all comments
received from members of the public available for public viewing in
their entirety on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters should be careful to include
in their comments only information that they wish to make publicly
available.
This is a request for information (RFI) only. This RFI is not a
request for proposals (RFP) or a promise to issue an RFP or a notice of
proposed rulemaking. This RFI does not commit the Department to
contract for any supply or service whatsoever. Further, we are not
seeking proposals and will not accept unsolicited proposals. The
Department will not pay for any information or administrative costs
that you may incur in responding to this RFI. The documents and
information submitted in response to this RFI become the property of
the U.S. Government and will not be returned.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Clark, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW, Room 2C185, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 453-7977. Email: [email protected].
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In 2020, the Department proposed and issued final regulations to
add material conditions relating to First Amendment freedoms and free
inquiry to certain Department grants. These regulations, commonly
referred to as the ``Free Inquiry Rule,'' added provisions related to
free inquiry (Sec. 75.500(b) and (c) for Direct Grant Programs, and
Sec. 76.500(b) and (c) for State-Administered Formula Grant Programs),
making it a material condition of these Department grants that public
institutions of higher education (IHEs) that receive these grants
comply with the First Amendment and private institutions that receive
grants from the Department follow their stated institutional policies
on freedom of speech, including academic freedom. As acknowledged in
the 2020 final rule, public IHEs are already legally required to comply
with the First Amendment and private IHEs are required to comply with
their stated policies on freedom of speech. The intended effect of
making compliance a material condition of receiving Department grants
is to encourage IHEs to foster environments that promote open,
intellectually engaging, and diverse debate.
The 2020 final rule states that an IHE will be determined to have
violated the grant conditions in Sec. Sec. 75.500(b) and (c) and
76.500(b) and (c) only if a State or Federal court issues a final, non-
default judgment against a public IHE for violating the First Amendment
or against a private IHE for violating stated institutional policies.
In the 2020 NPRM and 2020 final rule, the Department stated that we
believed State and Federal courts are the appropriate arbiters of
alleged free speech violations. Under the 2020 final rule, the
Department's role is deciding whether and to what extent to impose
additional penalties where such court judgments have been rendered,
including, but not limited to, withholding Federal grant funding. The
preamble to the 2020 final rule stated that if a court issues such a
judgment against a public IHE for violating the First Amendment or a
private IHE for violating stated institutional policies, the
institution must submit to the Secretary a copy of the judgment within
45 days. The Department would then consider such a grantee to be in
violation of a material condition and could pursue available remedies
for noncompliance.
Furthermore, the 2020 final rule added a third provision (Sec.
75.500(d) for Direct Grant Programs and Sec. 76.500(d) for State-
Administered Formula Grant Programs) prohibiting public IHEs from
denying to a religious student organization at the public institution
any right, benefit, or privilege that is otherwise afforded to other
student organizations at the institution because of the religious
student organization's beliefs, practices, policies, speech, membership
standards, or leadership standards informed by sincerely held religious
beliefs. That provision is not part of this request for information and
is instead being addressed separately in a notice of proposed
rulemaking (see Docket ID ED-2022-OPE-0157).
II. Review of 34 CFR 75.500 and 76.500, Paragraphs (b) and (c)
On August 19, 2021, the Department issued a blog post announcing
that we were conducting a review of these regulations while keeping in
mind the importance of several key elements, including First Amendment
protections, nondiscrimination requirements, and the promotion of
inclusive learning environments for all students.\1\ We stated in our
blog post that the First Amendment requires that public colleges and
universities not infringe upon students' rights to engage in protected
free speech and religious exercise and emphasized our long-held and
continuing view that ``[p]rotecting First Amendment freedoms on public
university and college campuses is essential.'' The Department further
recognized that IHEs, their students, and the courts have historically
been responsible for resolving disputes relating to these complex
matters where these important principles intersect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Cooper, Michelle Asha. ``Update on the Free Inquiry Rule,''
Department of Education Homeroom Blog (Aug. 19, 2021), https://blog.ed.gov/2021/08/update-on-the-free-inquiry-rule/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As part of the review, the Department conducted outreach and held
meetings with higher education and institutional stakeholders,
including organizations representing minority-serving institutions and
other under-resourced institutions; faith-based organizations,
including organizations representing religious IHEs; and organizations
that advocate for civil rights and civil liberties. The purpose of the
meetings was to hear from impacted groups that had diverging
perspectives in their comments on the proposed provisions in the 2020
NPRM. Some institutional stakeholders raised on-going concerns that the
provisions added by the 2020 final rule in paragraphs (b) and (c) of 34
CFR 75.500 and 76.500 unnecessarily go beyond what is required by the
courts, encourage campus community members to pursue litigation more
frequently, and
[[Page 10883]]
undermine existing campus processes. Stakeholders also stated that
these provisions could increase institutional costs as a result of
increased litigation and prompt institutions to change their approach
to litigation, such as being more likely to settle. In the case of
private institutions, the Department has heard concerns that the
regulations may incentivize private colleges to limit, eliminate, or
reconsider their policies on free speech for fear of losing grant
funds. Some stakeholders indicated support for these provisions and
stated that the regulation helps secure crucial civil liberties under
the First Amendment.
III. Solicitation of Comments: Impact of 34 CFR 75.500 and 76.500,
Paragraphs (b) and (c)
The Biden-Harris Administration deeply values the First Amendment,
including its guarantees of free speech and free exercise. The
Department is seeking input from the public on how the regulations have
affected or are reasonably expected to affect decisions surrounding
First Amendment and free speech-related litigation in Federal and State
court and institutional policies on freedom of speech. The Department
is interested in this public input to inform its review of the current
regulations and its implementation of applicable grant programs. This
effort is separate from any ongoing regulatory work. The deadline for
these submissions is March 24, 2023.
The Department encourages comments from impacted institutions of
higher education; researchers, academics, policy experts, and other
individuals familiar with First Amendment rights and institutional
policies; organizations that work on First Amendment issues, including
those that work directly with institutions and students; students and
other members of the public.
The Department seeks responses to the specific questions below, as
well as the general concepts and topics identified as they relate to
First Amendment rights and free speech policies on campus.
The Department invites comments as to:
1. Whether and how the current regulations have affected or are
reasonably expected to affect decisions surrounding First Amendment and
free speech-related litigation in Federal and State court;
2. How these regulations have affected or are reasonably expected
to affect public IHEs' approach to designing institutional policies
related to First Amendment protections, including on-campuses processes
used to address alleged free speech and academic freedom violations;
3. How these regulations have affected or are reasonably expected
to affect private IHEs' approach to designing institutional policies
related to free speech and academic freedom, including on-campuses
processes used to address alleged free speech and academic freedom
violations;
4. Whether and how these grant conditions have provided additional
protections of First Amendment rights in the case of public colleges,
or promotion of free speech and free inquiry policies in the case of
private institutions;
5. Whether these regulations affect or could be expected to affect
how aggrieved campus community members seek resolution to alleged free
speech and academic freedom policy violations;
6. Whether these regulations have resulted in additional
quantifiable costs beyond what was considered in the 2020 final rule;
7. Any other information that the public believes would inform the
Department's understanding of the impact of these regulations.
Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document in an accessible format. The Department will
provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich
Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file,
braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible
format.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Nasser H. Paydar,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2023-03671 Filed 2-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P