Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9522, 9524, 9559 and 9630, 4239-4243 [2023-01265]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2023 / Notices
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but is
designed to modernize the service and
filing process in harmonization with the
approved FINRA Rules.
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 32 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.33 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 34 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),35 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing. The Exchange
states that this filing is noncontroversial and eligible to become
effective immediately because the
proposal promotes uniformity in
disciplinary rules across self-regulatory
organizations and thereby enables the
Exchange to modernize the service and
filing process related to the conduct of
disciplinary hearings.36 The Exchange
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
34 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
35 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
36 See supra Item II.
33 17
19:17 Jan 23, 2023
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEAMER–2023–04 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to: Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2023–04. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
37 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule change’s impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
38 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
32 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
further states that the proposed rule
change would not significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest or impose any significant
burden on competition because the
proposed rule change is based on the
approved FINRA Rules. After reviewing
the filing, the Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay for
this proposal is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. Accordingly, the Commission
hereby waives the 30-day operative
delay and designates the proposal
operative upon filing.37
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under section 19(b)(2)(B) 38 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4239
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2023–04 and
should be submitted on or before
February 14, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.39
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–01266 Filed 1–23–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–96688; File No. SR–NYSE–
2023–04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Rules 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9522,
9524, 9559 and 9630
January 18, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on January 4,
2023, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
39 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
4240
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2023 / Notices
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rules 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9522,
9524, 9559 and 9630 to permit, and in
some instances require, electronic
service and filing of documents in
disciplinary and other proceedings and
appeals, in conformity with recent
changes by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’).
The proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rules 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9522,
9524, 9559 and 9630 to permit, and in
some instances require, electronic
service and filing of documents in
disciplinary and other proceedings, in
conformity with recent changes by
FINRA.
In 2020, following the outbreak of the
Coronavirus Disease (‘‘COVID–19’’),
FINRA temporarily amended certain of
its rules, including related to the
method of service and filing in
disciplinary proceedings before the
Office of Hearing Officers (OHO) and
appeals before the National
Adjudicatory Council (NAC), among
other types of administrative
proceedings (the ‘‘temporary
amendments’’).4 The temporary
4 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
88917 (May 20, 2020), 85 FR 31832 (May 27, 2020)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Jan 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
amendments allowed, and in some
instances required, FINRA (in its
capacity as an Adjudicator per Rule
9120) to serve certain documents on
parties by electronic mail (‘‘email’’) and
required parties to file or serve
documents by email, unless the parties
agreed to an alternative method of
service.5 Earlier this year, FINRA made
permanent the temporary amendments
to its rules regarding electronic service
and filing permanent, with some
modifications.6
In support of its filing, FINRA noted
that advances in technology and its
availability made filing and service
permitted by the temporary
amendments more efficient than under
FINRA’s ‘‘original’’ (non-amended)
rules.7 Moreover, FINRA determined
that electronic service and filing is
beneficial for parties, panelists and
FINRA staff.8 FINRA also noted that the
Commission likewise amended its rules
in November 2020 to require electronic
filing and service of documents in its
administrative proceedings.9 For these
reasons, FINRA determined that making
permanent the temporary amendments
would similarly improve and modernize
FINRA’s operations.10
To likewise improve and modernize
Exchange rules, the Exchange proposes
to modify certain of its disciplinary
rules to allow for electronic service and
filing of documents in disciplinary and
(SR–FINRA–2020–015) (Notice and immediate
effectiveness of filing to temporarily amend certain
timing, method of service and other procedural
requirements in FINRA Rules during the outbreak
of COVID–19). FINRA extended the temporary
amendments several times before filing to make
certain of the aforementioned amendments
permanent. The temporary amendments included
rule changes to permit the conduct of virtual
hearings (i.e., Rules 9261 and 9830), which rule
changes are not being included in this proposal.
Rather, the Exchange is solely copying a subset of
rules covered by the temporary amendments as
discussed herein.
5 See id.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 95147
(June 23, 2022), 87 FR 38803 (June 29, 2022) (order
approving change to certain FINRA rules to permit,
and in some instances require, electronic service
and filing of documents in disciplinary and other
proceedings and appeals) (‘‘Approval Order of
FINRA Rules’’); 94654 (April 8, 2022), 87 FR 22264
(April 14, 2022) (SR–FINRA–2022–009) (‘‘FINRA
Notice’’). The Approval Order of FINRA Rules
related to FINRA Rules 1012, 1015, 6490, 9132,
9133, 9135, 9146, 9321, 9341, 9349, 9351, 9522,
9524, 9559 and 9630 (collectively, ‘‘the approved
FINRA Rules’’).
7 See FINRA Notice, 87 FR at 22267.
8 See FINRA Notice, 87 FR at 22267.
9 See Amendments to the Commission’s Rules of
Practice, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90442
(November 17, 2020), 85 FR 86464 (File No. S7–18–
15) (December 30, 2020) (codified at 17 CFR 201
(2020)).
10 See FINRA Notice, 87 FR at 22266–67.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
other proceedings in conformity with
the approved FINRA Rules.11
Background
In 2013, the NYSE adopted
disciplinary rules that are, with certain
exceptions, substantially the same as the
FINRA Rule 8000 Series and Rule 9000
Series, and which set forth rules for
conducting investigations and
enforcement actions.12 The NYSE
disciplinary rules were implemented on
July 1, 2013.13 The Exchange notes that
FINRA and OHO administers
disciplinary hearings on the Exchange’s
behalf.
In adopting disciplinary rules
modeled on FINRA’s rules, the NYSE
adopted the filing, service and other
procedural requirements as contained
the FINRA Rule 9100, 9500, and 9600
Series. As adopted, the text of Exchange
Rules 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9522,
9524, 9559 and 9630 are based on, and
are substantially the same as, their
counterpart FINRA rules.14
Proposed Rule Change
Consistent with FINRA’s recent
proposal, the Exchange proposes to
amend certain of its disciplinary rules
related to filing, service and other
procedural requirements and appeals.
The proposed rule change includes
provisions to allow, and in some
instances require, FINRA (in its capacity
as an Adjudicator per Rule 9120) to
serve certain documents on parties by
email and require parties to file or serve
documents by email, unless another
method of service is ordered by the
Adjudicator.15 In addition, to support
the transition to email service and filing,
the Exchange proposes to require parties
in OHO proceedings to file and serve all
11 Consistent with the Approval Order of FINRA
Rules, the Exchange is not proposing to permit
electronic service of an initial complaint on a
respondent due to heightened fair process concerns.
As is the case today, the only permissible methods
of serving the initial complaint are by hand, mail
or courier. See Rule 9131(b) (requiring that service
be pursuant to Rule 9134(a)).
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68678
(January 16, 2013), 78 FR 5213 (January 24, 2013)
(SR–NYSE–2013–02), 69045 (March 5, 2013), 78 FR
15394 (March 11, 2013) (SR–NYSE–2013–02), and
69963 (July 10, 2013), 78 FR 42573 (July 16, 2013)
(SR–NYSE–2013–49).
13 See NYSE Information Memorandum 13–8
(May 24, 2013).
14 The Exchange notes that this proposal adopts
a subset of the approved FINRA Rules, which
subset are applicable to the Exchange rules. As
noted herein, this proposal does not extend to the
temporary amendments related to the conduct of
virtual hearings (i.e., Rules 9261 and 9830).
15 To the extent that a party lacks the ability to
use or access technology needed to file, serve or
accept service by email, FINRA, as adjudicator, may
order an alternative method of service upon a
showing of good cause. See FINRA Notice, 87 FR
at 22265.
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2023 / Notices
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICES
parties with their current email address
and contact information at the time of
their first appearance, and to file and
serve any change in email address or
contact information during the course of
the proceeding.
The proposed rule change would
permit service of documents other than
the initial complaint by email among
various other methods of service, such
as personal service, mail and courier,
and to provide that service by email is
deemed complete upon sending. The
Exchange intends to elect email service
whenever possible. If the Exchange has
knowledge that the address used for
service is not current or not functional
(i.e., the Exchange receives a bounce
back or other message indicating that
there was a failure to deliver the email),
the Exchange will use other permissible
methods of service until it can verify the
party’s email address.16 The Exchange
notes that, in most cases, the Exchange
and the relevant party, or their counsel,
will have already engaged in
communications prior to the service of
documents or other information.
Accordingly, in most cases, the
Exchange will already have information
regarding the relevant party, or their
counsel’s, preferred method of service.
The Rule 9000 Series, among other
things, sets forth the procedure for
disciplinary proceedings concerning a
member, associated person or formerly
associated person. The Rule 9100 Series
is of general applicability to all
proceedings set forth in the Rule 9000
Series, unless a rule specifically
provides otherwise. Rules 9132(b),17
9133(b),18 and 9146(l) 19 provide that
the documents and other information
governed by those rules be served
pursuant to Rule 9134, which permits
service on the parties using the
following methods: (1) personal service,
(2) mail, or (3) courier. Rule 9134 does
not permit service by email. The
proposed rule change would amend
Rule 9132(b) to allow service of the
relevant documents or information by
email, and Rules 9133(b) and 9146(l) to
require parties to serve documents by
email, unless an alternative method of
service is ordered by the Adjudicator.
In addition, to support the transition
to email service and filing, the Exchange
16 As indicated in the proposed rule text, the
Exchange will consider service by email complete
upon sending of the relevant document or other
information. This is consistent with service by mail
under the current rules.
17 Rule 9132(b) (Service of Orders, Notices, and
Decisions by Adjudicator; How Served).
18 Rule 9133(b) (Service of Papers Other Than
Complaints, Orders, Notices or Decisions; How
Served).
19 Rule 9146(l) (Motions; General).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Jan 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
proposes to amend Rule 9135 to add
paragraph (d), which would require
parties in OHO proceedings to file and
serve the parties with their current
email address and contact information
at the time of their first appearance, and
to file and serve any change in email
address or contact information during
the course of the proceeding.20 The
Exchange believes this proposed rule
change will help ensure that documents
are successfully sent from and received
at a valid email address. It will also
ensure that all participants, including
the Exchange, applicants, respondents
and any other parties, have accurate
contact information for all parties.
The Rule 9520 Series sets forth the
procedures for eligibility proceedings
and review of those proceedings by the
Exchange Board. Because the applicable
rules in this series do not allow for
email as a method of service, the
Exchange proposes to modify Rule
9522(a)(4) 21 and to add new paragraph
(d) to Rule 9524 22 to permit effective
service by email.
The Rule 9550 Series sets forth the
procedures for expedited proceedings
and the ability of the Exchange Board to
call for review a proposed decision
prepared under the Rule 9550 Series.
Rule 9559(h) 23 sets forth the timing and
method of service requirements for the
parties’ exchange of proposed exhibit
and witness lists in advance of an
expedited proceeding, but do not allow
for email as a method of service. The
Exchange proposes to amend Rule
9559(h)(2) to require service of exhibit
and witness lists by email, unless an
alternative method of service is ordered
by the Adjudicator and to remove text
from Rule 9559(h)(1) that requires that
documents served by email must also be
served by overnight courier or personal
service.24 Finally, the Exchange
proposes to add new paragraph (s) to
Rule 9559 to provide that, for purposes
of proposed Rule 9559(h), service by
email is complete upon sending the
documents or decision.25
20 See proposed Rule 9135(d) (Filing of Papers
with Adjudicator: Procedure; Party Contact
Information).
21 See proposed Rule 9522(a)(4) (Initiation of
Eligibility Proceeding; Member Regulation
Consideration; Service).
22 See proposed Rule 9524(d) (Exchange Board of
Directors Consideration; Service by Electronic Mail;
When Service is Complete).
23 Rule 9559(h) (Hearing Procedures for
Expedited Proceedings Under the Rule 9550 Series).
Rule 9559(h) currently permits email as a method
of service.
24 See proposed Rule 9559(h)(1), (2) (Hearing
Procedures for Expedited Proceedings Under the
Rule 9550 Series; Transmission of Documents).
25 See proposed Rule 9559(s) (Hearing Procedures
for Expedited Proceedings Under the Rule 9550
Series; Service by Email; When Service is
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4241
The Rule 9600 Series sets forth the
procedures for members to seek
exemptive relief from a variety of
Exchange rules. Rule 9630(e) 26 requires
the Exchange (via the Chief Regulatory
Officer) to serve its decision pursuant to
Rules 9132 and 9134, which do not
allow for email as a method of service.
The proposed rule change would amend
Rule 9630 to add new paragraph (d) to
allow for email as a method of service.27
The Exchange believes that this
proposal, like the approved FINRA
Rules, will modernize the rules and
make service and filing more efficient
and effective. Email technology is
widely available, and use of electronic
methods of service and filing is common
practice in the courts and other
regulatory agencies, including the
Commission.28
As noted below, the Exchange has
filed the proposed rule change for
immediate effectiveness and has
requested that the Commission waive
the requirement that the proposed rule
change not become operative for 30 days
after the date of the filing, so the
Exchange can implement the proposed
rule change immediately.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with section 6(b) of the Act,29
in general, and furthers the objectives of
section 6(b)(5),30 in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Additionally, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is designed to provide a fair
procedure for the disciplining of
members and persons associated with
members, consistent with sections
6(b)(7) and 6(d) of the Act.31
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change protects investors
and the public interest by requiring use
of broadly available technology to make
service and filing processes more
Complete). Rule 9559(h) currently permits email as
a method of service.
26 See Rule 9630 (Procedures for Exemptions;
Appeal).
27 See proposed Rule 9630(f) (Appeal; Service by
Electronic Mail; When Service is Complete).
28 See supra note 9 (regarding Amendments to the
Commission’s Rules of Practice).
29 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
30 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
31 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7) & 78f(d).
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICES
4242
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2023 / Notices
efficient and effective. The Exchange’s
disciplinary and eligibility proceedings
and other review processes serve a
critical role in providing investor
protection and maintaining fair and
orderly markets by, for example,
sanctioning misconduct and preventing
further customer harm by members and
associated persons.
The proposed rule change promotes
efficiency in these processes by
permitting electronic service and filing
in most instances. To ensure that
documents are effectively sent and
received, the Exchange is proposing to
require parties to provide and update
their contact information, including
their email address, during the course of
a proceeding. These amendments
reduce the reliance on paper documents
in favor of more efficient electronic
formats. The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change regarding
electronic service and filing is
especially important as hybrid and
remote work become more common.
The Exchange notes that, per the
approved FINRA Rules, there are
procedures in place for persons who
lack the ability to use or access
technology necessary to send or receive
documents electronically to request
relief from FINRA (as the Adjudicator)
to file or serve documents by another
method. Per FINRA, requests to use
non-electronic methods of service were
rare during the approximately two year
period that it operated under the
temporary amendments and, as such,
FINRA anticipates that such requests
under the approved FINRA Rules will
be rare.
In addition, the proposed rule change
balances the interests of fairness and
efficiency. As discussed, service of the
initial complaint will continue to occur
by hand, mail or courier, rather than by
electronic means, thus ensuring there is
satisfactory notice and fair process.
Thus, the proposed rule change
represents a significant step toward
modernizing the service and filing
processes in a manner that will protect
investors and the public interest by
promoting efficiency while preserving
fair process.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change supports the
objectives of the Act by providing
greater harmonization between
Exchange rules and FINRA rules of
similar purpose, resulting in less
burdensome and more efficient
regulatory compliance. As such, the
proposed rule change will foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities and will
remove impediments to and perfect the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Jan 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but is
designed to modernize the service and
filing process in harmonization with the
approved FINRA Rules.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 32 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.33 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 34 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),35 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing. The Exchange
states that this filing is noncontroversial and eligible to become
effective immediately because the
proposal promotes uniformity in
disciplinary rules across self-regulatory
organizations and thereby enables the
Exchange to modernize the service and
32 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
34 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
35 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
33 17
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
filing process related to the conduct of
disciplinary hearings.36 The Exchange
further states that the proposed rule
change would not significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest or impose any significant
burden on competition because the
proposed rule change is based on the
approved FINRA Rules. After reviewing
the filing, the Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay for
this proposal is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. Accordingly, the Commission
hereby waives the 30-day operative
delay and designates the proposal
operative upon filing.37
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under section 19(b)(2)(B) 38 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2023–04 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to: Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2023–04. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
36 See
supra Item II.
purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule change’s impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
38 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
37 For
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2023 / Notices
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2023–04 and should
be submitted on or before February 14,
2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.39
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–01265 Filed 1–23–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–96684; File No. SR–CBOE–
2022–051]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Order Instituting
Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Rules Relating
to the Processing of Auction
Responses
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICES
January 18, 2023.
On October 3, 2022, Cboe Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘the Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe
Options’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
39 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Jan 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
amend its rules relating to the
processing of auction responses. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
October 20, 2022.3 On November 23,
2022, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,4 the Commission designated a
longer period within which to approve
the proposed rule change, disapprove
the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change.5
The Commission has received no
comments on the proposed rule change.
This order institutes proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 6 to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.
I. Summary of the Proposed Rule
Change 7
The Exchange proposes to adopt new
functionality that would be applicable
to all of its auction mechanisms, to
increase the likelihood that timely
submitted auction responses may
participate in the applicable auction,
even during periods of high message
traffic. The affected auctions are the
Complex Order Auction,8 Step Up
Mechanism,9 Automated Improvement
Mechanism,10 Complex AIM,11
Solicitation Auction Mechanism,12
Complex SAM,13 FLEX Auction
Process,14 FLEX AIM 15 and FLEX
SAM.16 The Exchange also proposes to
amend its current rule relating to
Priority Queue 17 functionality to
provide itself with discretion on
whether or not to implement Priority
Queue 18 functionality for responses to
the auction mechanisms.
The Exchange represents that the
above-referenced auction mechanisms
provide price improvement
opportunities for an eligible order.
Within each auction mechanism, the
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96081
(Oct. 14, 2022), 87 FR 63830 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96380,
87 FR 73366 (Nov. 29, 2022). The Commission
designated January 18, 2023 as the date by which
the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change.
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
7 For a full description of all aspects of the
proposed rule change, please see the Notice, supra
note 3.
8 See Cboe Rule 5.33(d).
9 See Cboe Rule 5.35.
10 See Cboe Rule 5.37.
11 See Cboe Rule 5.38.
12 See Cboe Rule 5.39.
13 See Cboe Rule 5.40.
14 See Cboe Rule 5.72(c).
15 See Cboe Rule 5.73.
16 See Cboe Rule 5.74.
17 See Cboe Rule 5.25(c).
18 See Cboe Rule 5.25(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4243
eligible order is electronically exposed
for an Exchange-determined period of
time (‘‘auction response period’’) in
accordance with the applicable
Exchange Rule.19 After the Exchange
disseminates an auction notification
message, Users 20 may submit responses
(‘‘auction responses’’ or ‘‘auction
response messages’’) during the auction
response period.21 An auction response
may only execute in the applicable
auction mechanism, and the auction
response is cancelled if it does not
execute during an auction.22
The Exchange states that auction
response messages historically have
waited in the same System 23 queue as
all other order and quote message
traffic.24 According to the Exchange, if
an auction response is submitted when
there is a deep queue of other
unprocessed message traffic (such as
mass cancellation messages or other
orders and quotes), it is possible that the
auction response may not be
‘‘processed’’ by the System prior to the
end of the auction response period,25
The Exchange states that in such an
instance, the queued auction response
may not be able to participate in the
applicable auction mechanism because
the System had unprocessed (queued)
messages at the time of the auction
execution, despite the fact that the User
submitted the auction response prior to
the end of the auction response
period.26 The Exchange believes that
19 See
Notice, supra note 3, at 63831.
term ‘‘User’’ means any Trading Permit
Holder or Sponsored User who is authorized to
obtain access to the System pursuant to Cboe Rule
5.5. See Cboe Rule 1.1.
21 See Notice, supra note 3, at 63831.
22 See id.
23 The term ‘‘System’’ means the Exchange’s
hybrid trading platform that integrates electronic
and open outcry trading of option contracts on the
Exchange, and includes any connectivity to the
foregoing trading platform that is administered by
or on behalf of the Exchange, such as a
communications hub. See Cboe Rule 1.1.
24 Although the Exchange previously adopted
Priority Queue functionality, which provides that
auction response messages may be processed
through a Priority Queue, and all remaining
messages would be processed through a General
Queue, the Exchange never implemented use of the
functionality. See Notice, supra note 3 at 63832.
The Exchange states that, should it decide to
implement use of a Priority Queue in the future, it
would provide notice to all TPHs. Id.
25 For example, the Exchange states that it takes
the System approximately 10 microseconds to
process a single order/quote or auction response
message and, on average, approximately 190
microseconds to process a mass cancel message. As
such, under the current System, an auction
response that is entered after a mass cancel message
is more likely to be detrimentally delayed as
compared to a mass cancel message that is entered
after an auction response (i.e., a 190 microsecond
‘‘wait time’’ versus a 10 microsecond ‘‘wait time’’).
See id.
26 See id.
20 The
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4239-4243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01265]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-96688; File No. SR-NYSE-2023-04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rules 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9522, 9524, 9559 and 9630
January 18, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that on January 4, 2023, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have
[[Page 4240]]
been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9522,
9524, 9559 and 9630 to permit, and in some instances require,
electronic service and filing of documents in disciplinary and other
proceedings and appeals, in conformity with recent changes by the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''). The proposed
rule change is available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9522,
9524, 9559 and 9630 to permit, and in some instances require,
electronic service and filing of documents in disciplinary and other
proceedings, in conformity with recent changes by FINRA.
In 2020, following the outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease
(``COVID-19''), FINRA temporarily amended certain of its rules,
including related to the method of service and filing in disciplinary
proceedings before the Office of Hearing Officers (OHO) and appeals
before the National Adjudicatory Council (NAC), among other types of
administrative proceedings (the ``temporary amendments'').\4\ The
temporary amendments allowed, and in some instances required, FINRA (in
its capacity as an Adjudicator per Rule 9120) to serve certain
documents on parties by electronic mail (``email'') and required
parties to file or serve documents by email, unless the parties agreed
to an alternative method of service.\5\ Earlier this year, FINRA made
permanent the temporary amendments to its rules regarding electronic
service and filing permanent, with some modifications.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88917 (May
20, 2020), 85 FR 31832 (May 27, 2020) (SR-FINRA-2020-015) (Notice
and immediate effectiveness of filing to temporarily amend certain
timing, method of service and other procedural requirements in FINRA
Rules during the outbreak of COVID-19). FINRA extended the temporary
amendments several times before filing to make certain of the
aforementioned amendments permanent. The temporary amendments
included rule changes to permit the conduct of virtual hearings
(i.e., Rules 9261 and 9830), which rule changes are not being
included in this proposal. Rather, the Exchange is solely copying a
subset of rules covered by the temporary amendments as discussed
herein.
\5\ See id.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 95147 (June 23,
2022), 87 FR 38803 (June 29, 2022) (order approving change to
certain FINRA rules to permit, and in some instances require,
electronic service and filing of documents in disciplinary and other
proceedings and appeals) (``Approval Order of FINRA Rules''); 94654
(April 8, 2022), 87 FR 22264 (April 14, 2022) (SR-FINRA-2022-009)
(``FINRA Notice''). The Approval Order of FINRA Rules related to
FINRA Rules 1012, 1015, 6490, 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9321, 9341,
9349, 9351, 9522, 9524, 9559 and 9630 (collectively, ``the approved
FINRA Rules'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In support of its filing, FINRA noted that advances in technology
and its availability made filing and service permitted by the temporary
amendments more efficient than under FINRA's ``original'' (non-amended)
rules.\7\ Moreover, FINRA determined that electronic service and filing
is beneficial for parties, panelists and FINRA staff.\8\ FINRA also
noted that the Commission likewise amended its rules in November 2020
to require electronic filing and service of documents in its
administrative proceedings.\9\ For these reasons, FINRA determined that
making permanent the temporary amendments would similarly improve and
modernize FINRA's operations.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See FINRA Notice, 87 FR at 22267.
\8\ See FINRA Notice, 87 FR at 22267.
\9\ See Amendments to the Commission's Rules of Practice,
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90442 (November 17, 2020), 85 FR
86464 (File No. S7-18-15) (December 30, 2020) (codified at 17 CFR
201 (2020)).
\10\ See FINRA Notice, 87 FR at 22266-67.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To likewise improve and modernize Exchange rules, the Exchange
proposes to modify certain of its disciplinary rules to allow for
electronic service and filing of documents in disciplinary and other
proceedings in conformity with the approved FINRA Rules.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Consistent with the Approval Order of FINRA Rules, the
Exchange is not proposing to permit electronic service of an initial
complaint on a respondent due to heightened fair process concerns.
As is the case today, the only permissible methods of serving the
initial complaint are by hand, mail or courier. See Rule 9131(b)
(requiring that service be pursuant to Rule 9134(a)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
In 2013, the NYSE adopted disciplinary rules that are, with certain
exceptions, substantially the same as the FINRA Rule 8000 Series and
Rule 9000 Series, and which set forth rules for conducting
investigations and enforcement actions.\12\ The NYSE disciplinary rules
were implemented on July 1, 2013.\13\ The Exchange notes that FINRA and
OHO administers disciplinary hearings on the Exchange's behalf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68678 (January 16,
2013), 78 FR 5213 (January 24, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-02), 69045 (March
5, 2013), 78 FR 15394 (March 11, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-02), and 69963
(July 10, 2013), 78 FR 42573 (July 16, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-49).
\13\ See NYSE Information Memorandum 13-8 (May 24, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In adopting disciplinary rules modeled on FINRA's rules, the NYSE
adopted the filing, service and other procedural requirements as
contained the FINRA Rule 9100, 9500, and 9600 Series. As adopted, the
text of Exchange Rules 9132, 9133, 9135, 9146, 9522, 9524, 9559 and
9630 are based on, and are substantially the same as, their counterpart
FINRA rules.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The Exchange notes that this proposal adopts a subset of
the approved FINRA Rules, which subset are applicable to the
Exchange rules. As noted herein, this proposal does not extend to
the temporary amendments related to the conduct of virtual hearings
(i.e., Rules 9261 and 9830).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Change
Consistent with FINRA's recent proposal, the Exchange proposes to
amend certain of its disciplinary rules related to filing, service and
other procedural requirements and appeals. The proposed rule change
includes provisions to allow, and in some instances require, FINRA (in
its capacity as an Adjudicator per Rule 9120) to serve certain
documents on parties by email and require parties to file or serve
documents by email, unless another method of service is ordered by the
Adjudicator.\15\ In addition, to support the transition to email
service and filing, the Exchange proposes to require parties in OHO
proceedings to file and serve all
[[Page 4241]]
parties with their current email address and contact information at the
time of their first appearance, and to file and serve any change in
email address or contact information during the course of the
proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ To the extent that a party lacks the ability to use or
access technology needed to file, serve or accept service by email,
FINRA, as adjudicator, may order an alternative method of service
upon a showing of good cause. See FINRA Notice, 87 FR at 22265.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change would permit service of documents other
than the initial complaint by email among various other methods of
service, such as personal service, mail and courier, and to provide
that service by email is deemed complete upon sending. The Exchange
intends to elect email service whenever possible. If the Exchange has
knowledge that the address used for service is not current or not
functional (i.e., the Exchange receives a bounce back or other message
indicating that there was a failure to deliver the email), the Exchange
will use other permissible methods of service until it can verify the
party's email address.\16\ The Exchange notes that, in most cases, the
Exchange and the relevant party, or their counsel, will have already
engaged in communications prior to the service of documents or other
information. Accordingly, in most cases, the Exchange will already have
information regarding the relevant party, or their counsel's, preferred
method of service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ As indicated in the proposed rule text, the Exchange will
consider service by email complete upon sending of the relevant
document or other information. This is consistent with service by
mail under the current rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rule 9000 Series, among other things, sets forth the procedure
for disciplinary proceedings concerning a member, associated person or
formerly associated person. The Rule 9100 Series is of general
applicability to all proceedings set forth in the Rule 9000 Series,
unless a rule specifically provides otherwise. Rules 9132(b),\17\
9133(b),\18\ and 9146(l) \19\ provide that the documents and other
information governed by those rules be served pursuant to Rule 9134,
which permits service on the parties using the following methods: (1)
personal service, (2) mail, or (3) courier. Rule 9134 does not permit
service by email. The proposed rule change would amend Rule 9132(b) to
allow service of the relevant documents or information by email, and
Rules 9133(b) and 9146(l) to require parties to serve documents by
email, unless an alternative method of service is ordered by the
Adjudicator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Rule 9132(b) (Service of Orders, Notices, and Decisions by
Adjudicator; How Served).
\18\ Rule 9133(b) (Service of Papers Other Than Complaints,
Orders, Notices or Decisions; How Served).
\19\ Rule 9146(l) (Motions; General).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, to support the transition to email service and filing,
the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 9135 to add paragraph (d), which
would require parties in OHO proceedings to file and serve the parties
with their current email address and contact information at the time of
their first appearance, and to file and serve any change in email
address or contact information during the course of the proceeding.\20\
The Exchange believes this proposed rule change will help ensure that
documents are successfully sent from and received at a valid email
address. It will also ensure that all participants, including the
Exchange, applicants, respondents and any other parties, have accurate
contact information for all parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See proposed Rule 9135(d) (Filing of Papers with
Adjudicator: Procedure; Party Contact Information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rule 9520 Series sets forth the procedures for eligibility
proceedings and review of those proceedings by the Exchange Board.
Because the applicable rules in this series do not allow for email as a
method of service, the Exchange proposes to modify Rule 9522(a)(4) \21\
and to add new paragraph (d) to Rule 9524 \22\ to permit effective
service by email.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See proposed Rule 9522(a)(4) (Initiation of Eligibility
Proceeding; Member Regulation Consideration; Service).
\22\ See proposed Rule 9524(d) (Exchange Board of Directors
Consideration; Service by Electronic Mail; When Service is
Complete).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rule 9550 Series sets forth the procedures for expedited
proceedings and the ability of the Exchange Board to call for review a
proposed decision prepared under the Rule 9550 Series. Rule 9559(h)
\23\ sets forth the timing and method of service requirements for the
parties' exchange of proposed exhibit and witness lists in advance of
an expedited proceeding, but do not allow for email as a method of
service. The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 9559(h)(2) to require
service of exhibit and witness lists by email, unless an alternative
method of service is ordered by the Adjudicator and to remove text from
Rule 9559(h)(1) that requires that documents served by email must also
be served by overnight courier or personal service.\24\ Finally, the
Exchange proposes to add new paragraph (s) to Rule 9559 to provide
that, for purposes of proposed Rule 9559(h), service by email is
complete upon sending the documents or decision.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Rule 9559(h) (Hearing Procedures for Expedited Proceedings
Under the Rule 9550 Series). Rule 9559(h) currently permits email as
a method of service.
\24\ See proposed Rule 9559(h)(1), (2) (Hearing Procedures for
Expedited Proceedings Under the Rule 9550 Series; Transmission of
Documents).
\25\ See proposed Rule 9559(s) (Hearing Procedures for Expedited
Proceedings Under the Rule 9550 Series; Service by Email; When
Service is Complete). Rule 9559(h) currently permits email as a
method of service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rule 9600 Series sets forth the procedures for members to seek
exemptive relief from a variety of Exchange rules. Rule 9630(e) \26\
requires the Exchange (via the Chief Regulatory Officer) to serve its
decision pursuant to Rules 9132 and 9134, which do not allow for email
as a method of service. The proposed rule change would amend Rule 9630
to add new paragraph (d) to allow for email as a method of service.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Rule 9630 (Procedures for Exemptions; Appeal).
\27\ See proposed Rule 9630(f) (Appeal; Service by Electronic
Mail; When Service is Complete).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that this proposal, like the approved FINRA
Rules, will modernize the rules and make service and filing more
efficient and effective. Email technology is widely available, and use
of electronic methods of service and filing is common practice in the
courts and other regulatory agencies, including the Commission.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See supra note 9 (regarding Amendments to the Commission's
Rules of Practice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted below, the Exchange has filed the proposed rule change for
immediate effectiveness and has requested that the Commission waive the
requirement that the proposed rule change not become operative for 30
days after the date of the filing, so the Exchange can implement the
proposed rule change immediately.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) of the
Act,\29\ in general, and furthers the objectives of section
6(b)(5),\30\ in particular, because it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change is designed to provide a fair procedure for
the disciplining of members and persons associated with members,
consistent with sections 6(b)(7) and 6(d) of the Act.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7) & 78f(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change protects
investors and the public interest by requiring use of broadly available
technology to make service and filing processes more
[[Page 4242]]
efficient and effective. The Exchange's disciplinary and eligibility
proceedings and other review processes serve a critical role in
providing investor protection and maintaining fair and orderly markets
by, for example, sanctioning misconduct and preventing further customer
harm by members and associated persons.
The proposed rule change promotes efficiency in these processes by
permitting electronic service and filing in most instances. To ensure
that documents are effectively sent and received, the Exchange is
proposing to require parties to provide and update their contact
information, including their email address, during the course of a
proceeding. These amendments reduce the reliance on paper documents in
favor of more efficient electronic formats. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change regarding electronic service and filing is
especially important as hybrid and remote work become more common.
The Exchange notes that, per the approved FINRA Rules, there are
procedures in place for persons who lack the ability to use or access
technology necessary to send or receive documents electronically to
request relief from FINRA (as the Adjudicator) to file or serve
documents by another method. Per FINRA, requests to use non-electronic
methods of service were rare during the approximately two year period
that it operated under the temporary amendments and, as such, FINRA
anticipates that such requests under the approved FINRA Rules will be
rare.
In addition, the proposed rule change balances the interests of
fairness and efficiency. As discussed, service of the initial complaint
will continue to occur by hand, mail or courier, rather than by
electronic means, thus ensuring there is satisfactory notice and fair
process.
Thus, the proposed rule change represents a significant step toward
modernizing the service and filing processes in a manner that will
protect investors and the public interest by promoting efficiency while
preserving fair process.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change supports the
objectives of the Act by providing greater harmonization between
Exchange rules and FINRA rules of similar purpose, resulting in less
burdensome and more efficient regulatory compliance. As such, the
proposed rule change will foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities and will
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended to address competitive issues but is designed to modernize
the service and filing process in harmonization with the approved FINRA
Rules.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \32\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\33\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\33\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \34\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\35\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange states that
this filing is non-controversial and eligible to become effective
immediately because the proposal promotes uniformity in disciplinary
rules across self-regulatory organizations and thereby enables the
Exchange to modernize the service and filing process related to the
conduct of disciplinary hearings.\36\ The Exchange further states that
the proposed rule change would not significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest or impose any significant burden on
competition because the proposed rule change is based on the approved
FINRA Rules. After reviewing the filing, the Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay for this proposal is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. Accordingly,
the Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates
the proposal operative upon filing.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\35\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\36\ See supra Item II.
\37\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule change's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
section 19(b)(2)(B) \38\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2023-04 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2023-04. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will
[[Page 4243]]
post all comments on the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSE-2023-04 and should be submitted on or before February 14, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-01265 Filed 1-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P