Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule, 4058-4061 [2023-01117]
Download as PDF
4058
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2023 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–96677; File No. SR–
CboeEDGX–2023–001]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Fee Schedule
January 17, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January 3,
2023, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
chanege as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX Options’’)
proposes to amend its Fee Schedule.
The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Jan 20, 2023
Jkt 259001
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule, effective January 3, 2023.
The Exchange proposes to modify its
market data fees for EDGX Options
Top.3 Particularly, the Exchange
proposes to modify the Professional and
Non-Professional User Fees and adopt a
new Enterprise Fee for EDGX Options
Top.
The Exchange first proposes to reduce
the Professional and Non-Professional
User fees for EDGX Options Top. The
Exchange currently charges Internal
Distributors and External Distributors
that redistribute any of the EDGX
Options Data Feeds different fees for
their Professional Users 4 and NonProfessional Users.5 The Exchange
currently assesses a monthly fee for
Professional Users of $10.00 per User
and a monthly fee of $1.00 per NonProfessional User.6 Further, the Fee
Schedule provides that Users of any one
of EDGX Options market data products
(i.e., EDGX Options Top, EDGX Options
Depth, EDGX Options Auction Feed,
EDGX Options Complex Depth, EDGX
Options Complex Top, and EDGX
Options Complex Auction Fees) may
receive, at no additional charge, access
to any or all of the other market data
products listed. The Exchange proposes
to reduce the User fees for EDGX
3 EDGX Options Top is an uncompressed data
feed that offers top of book quotations and
execution information based on options orders
entered into the System.
4 A Professional User of an Exchange Market Data
product is any User other than a Non-Professional
User.
5 A ‘‘Non-Professional User’’ of an Exchange
Market Data product is a natural person or
qualifying trust that uses Data only for personal
purposes and not for any commercial purpose and,
for a natural person who works in the United States,
is not: (i) registered or qualified in any capacity
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
Commodities Futures Trading Commission, any
state securities agency, any securities exchange or
association, or any commodities or futures contract
market or association; (ii) engaged as an
‘‘investment adviser’’ as that term is defined in
Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisors Act
of 1940 (whether or not registered or qualified
under that Act); or (iii) employed by a bank or other
organization exempt from registration under federal
or state securities laws to perform functions that
would require registration or qualification if such
functions were performed for an organization not so
exempt; or, for a natural person who works outside
of the United States, does not perform the same
functions as would disqualify such person as a
Non-Professional User if he or she worked in the
United States.
6 Distributors that receive EDGX Options Data
Feeds are required to count every Professional User
and Non-Professional User to which they provide
the market data product(s).
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Options Top. Particularly, the Exchange
proposes to reduce the monthly (i)
Professional User fee from $10 per user
to $5 per user and (ii) Non-Professional
User fee from $1.00 per user to $0.10 per
user. The Exchange also proposes to
start charging separate User fees for
EDGX Options Top. User Fees for the
Exchange’s remaining market data
products will continue to receive, at no
additional charge, access to any or all of
the other market data products lists
(with the exception of EDGX Options
Top. The Exchange has reformatted the
Market Data Fees table to make this
clear.7
The Exchange lastly proposes to
establish a $20,000 per month
Enterprise Fee that will permit a
recipient firm who receives EDGX
Options Top Data from a Distributor to
receive the data for an unlimited
number of Professional and NonProfessional Users. The Enterprise Fee
is an alternative to User fees and will
permit a recipient firm who receives
EDGX Options Top Data from a
Distributor to pay a flat fee to receive
the data for an unlimited number of
Professional and Non-Professional
Users, which the Exchange proposes to
make clear in the Fee Schedule. The
Enterprise Fee may provide a recipient
an opportunity to reduce its fees. For
example, if a recipient firm has 15,000
Professional Users who each receive
EDGX Options Top at $5.00 per month
(as proposed), then that recipient firm
will pay $75,000 per month in
Professional Users fees. If the recipient
firm instead were to purchase the
proposed Enterprise license, the
recipient firm would alternatively pay a
flat fee of $20,000 for an unlimited
number of Professional and NonProfessional Users. A recipient firm
must pay a separate Enterprise Fee for
each Distributor that controls the
display of EDGX Options Top if it
wishes such User to be covered by an
Enterprise Fee rather than by per User
fees. A recipient firm that pays the
Enterprise Fee will not have to report its
number of such Users on a monthly
basis. Rather, every six months, the
recipient firm must provide the
Exchange with a count of the total
number of authorized person users of
each product, including both
Professional and Non-Professional
Users. The Exchange notes that the
purchase of an Enterprise license is
7 The Exchange is not proposing any changes to
the current User Fee rates for its other market data
products at this time and Users of any one of the
remaining market data products may continue to
receive, at no additional charge, access to any or all
of the other market data products listed (i.e., except
for EDGX Options Top).
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2023 / Notices
voluntary, and a firm may elect to
instead use the per User structure and
benefit from the proposed per User Fees
described above. For example, a firm
that does not have a sufficient number
of subscribers to benefit from purchase
of the license need not do so.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
section 6(b) of the Act.8 Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the section
6(b)(5) 9 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b)(4) of the Act,10 which
requires that Exchange rules provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its
Members and other persons using its
facilities.
The Exchange first notes that it
operates in a highly competitive
environment. Indeed, there are currently
16 registered options exchanges that
trade options. Based on publicly
available information, no single options
exchange has more than 18% of the
market share.11 The Exchange believes
top-of-book quotation and transaction
data is highly competitive as national
securities exchanges compete vigorously
with each other to provide efficient,
reliable, and low-cost data to a wide
range of investors and market
participants. Indeed, there are several
competing products offered by other
national securities exchanges today, not
counting products offered by the
Exchange’s affiliates, and each of the
Exchange’s affiliated U.S. options
exchanges also offers similar top-of8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
11 See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market
Month-to-Date Volume Summary (December 27,
2022), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/market_statistics/.
9 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Jan 20, 2023
Jkt 259001
book data.12 Each of those exchanges
offer top-of-book quotation and last sale
information based on their own
quotation and trading activity that is
substantially similar to the information
provided by the Exchange through the
EDGX Options Top Feed. Further, the
quote and last sale data contained in the
EDGX Options Top Feed is identical to
the data sent to OPRA for redistribution
to the public.13 Accordingly, market
participants can substitute EDGX
Options Top with feeds from other
exchanges and/or through OPRA.
Exchange top-of-book data is therefore
widely available today from a number of
different sources.
Moreover, the EDGX Options Top is
distributed and purchased on a
voluntary basis, in that neither the
Exchange nor market data distributors
are required by any rule or regulation to
make this data available. Accordingly,
Distributors and Users can discontinue
use at any time and for any reason,
including due to an assessment of the
reasonableness of fees charged. As
described above, market participants
have a wide variety of alternative
market data products from which to
choose, such as similar proprietary data
products offered by other exchanges and
consolidated data. Further, the
Exchange is not required to make any
proprietary data products available or to
offer any specific pricing alternatives to
any customers. Moreover, all brokerdealers involved in order routing must
take consolidated data from OPRA, and
proprietary data feeds cannot be used to
meet that particular requirement. As
such, all proprietary data feeds are
optional.
The Commission has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets.
Particularly, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
12 See e.g.,, NYSE Arca Options Proprietary
Market Data Fees Schedule, MIAX Options
Exchange, Fee Schedule, Section 6 (Market Data
Fees), Nasdaq PHLX Options 7 Pricing Schedule,
Section 10 (Proprietary Data Feed Fees) and Cboe
Data Services, LLC Fees Schedule.
13 The Exchange notes that it makes available to
‘‘Customers’’ the BBO data and last sale data that
is included in the EDGX Options Top Data Feed no
earlier than the time at which the Exchange sends
that data to OPRA.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4059
investors and listed companies.’’ 14
Making similar data products available
to market participants fosters
competition in the marketplace, and
constrains the ability of exchanges to
charge supracompetitive fees. In the
event that a market participant views
one exchange’s data product as more or
less attractive than the competition they
can and do switch between similar
products. The proposed fees are a result
of the competitive environment, as the
Exchange seeks to adopt fees to attract
purchasers of EDGX Options Top Data.
The Exchange believes the proposed
changes to reduce the current
Professional and Non-Professional User
fees are reasonable as recipient firms
will be subject to lower User fees.
Additionally, the User fees continue to
be lower than User fees assessed by
other exchanges for similar data.15 The
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because they will be
charged uniformly to recipient firms
and Users. The Exchange also believes
continuing to offer EDGX Options Top
Data to Non-Professional Users at a
lower cost than Professional Users
results in greater equity among data
recipients, as Professional Users are
categorized as such based on their
employment and participation in
financial markets, and thus, are
compensated to participate in the
markets. Although Non-Professional
Users too can receive significant
financial benefits through their
participation in the markets, the
Exchange believes it is reasonable to
charge more to those Users who are
more directly engaged in the markets.
The Exchange believes the proposed
change to start charging separate User
fees for EDGX Options Top is equitable
and reasonable because the Exchange
has not charged for separate User Fees
for both feeds since EDGX Options Top
was adopted in January 2018 and the
Exchange now wishes to have separate
User fees for EDGX Options Top.16
Moreover, the remaining EDGX Options
data products are purely optional. Only
those Customers that deem the products
14 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’).
15 See e.g., Nasdaq PHLX Options 7 Pricing
Schedule, Section 10 (Proprietary Data Feed Fees),
which provides for a fee of $40 per month to
professional users and $1.00 per month to nonprofessional users of Top of PHLX Options (TOPO)
Data. See also NYSE American Options Proprietary
Market Data Fees schedule, which provides for a fee
of $50 per month to professional users and $1.00
per month to non-professional users of American
Options Top Data.
16 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82462
(January 12, 2018), 83 FR 1647 (January 8, 2018)
(SR–CboeEDGX–2017–010).
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
4060
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2023 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
to be of sufficient overall value and
usefulness would purchase them.
Additionally, the Exchange is not
required to provide any User fee waiver
to any Distributors of EDGX Options
Top. The Exchange believes the
proposed change is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory as it will apply
uniformly to recipient firms.
The proposed Enterprise Fee for
EDGX Options Top Feed is equitable
and reasonable as the proposed fee
could result in a fee reduction for
recipient firms with a large number of
Professional and Non-Professional
Users. If a recipient firm has a smaller
number of Professional Users of EDGX
Options Top Data, then it may continue
using the per User structure and benefit
from the proposed per User Fee
reductions. By reducing prices for
recipient firms with a large number of
Professional and Non-Professional
Users, the Exchange believes that more
firms may choose to receive and to
distribute EDGX Options Top Data,
thereby expanding the distribution of
this market data for the benefit of
investors.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposed Enterprise Fee is reasonable
because it will simplify reporting for
certain recipients that have large
numbers of Professional and NonProfessional Users. Firms that pay the
proposed Enterprise Fee will not have to
report the number of Users on a
monthly basis as they currently do, but
rather will only have to count
authorized users every six months,
which is a significant reduction in
administrative burden. Finally, as
described above the Enterprise Fee is
entirely optional. A firm that does not
have a sufficient number of subscribers
to benefit from purchase of the license
need not do so.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change would result
in any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive environment, and its ability
to price top-of-book data is constrained
by competition among exchanges that
offer similar data products to their
customers. Top-of-book data is broadly
disseminated by competing U.S. options
exchanges and through OPRA. There are
therefore a number of alternative
products available to market
participants and investors, including
products offered by certain competing
exchanges. In this competitive
environment potential subscribers are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Jan 20, 2023
Jkt 259001
free to choose which competing product
to purchase to satisfy their need for
market information. Often, the choice
comes down to price, as market data
customers look to purchase cheaper data
products, and quality, as market
participants seek to purchase data that
represents significant market liquidity.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fees do not put any market
participants at a relative disadvantage
compared to other market participants.
As discussed, the proposed fees would
apply to all similarly situated recipient
firms of EDGX Options Top on an equal
and non-discriminatory basis. The
Exchange believes the differentiated fees
for Professional and Non-Professional
Users of EDGX Options Top is
appropriate given Professional Users are
categorized as such based on their
employment and participation in
financial markets, and thus, are
compensated to participate in the
markets. Non-Professional Users too can
receive significant financial benefits
through their participation in the
markets, however the Exchange believes
it is reasonable to charge more to those
Users who are more directly engaged in
the markets. The Exchange therefore
believes that the proposed fee neither
favors nor penalizes one or more
categories of market participants in a
manner that would impose an undue
burden on competition.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fees do not impose a burden
on competition or on other SROs that is
not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
In particular, market participants are not
forced to subscribe to EDGX Options
Top, or any of the Exchange’s data
feeds, as described above. Also as
described above, there are numerous
substitute products offered by other
national securities exchanges, as well as
OPRA. Because market data customers
can find suitable substitute feeds, an
exchange that overprices its market data
products stands a high risk that users
may substitute another product. These
competitive pressures ensure that no
one exchange’s market data fees can
impose an undue burden on
competition, and the Exchange’s
proposed fees do not do so here.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 17 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 18 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeEDGX–2023–001 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGX–2023–001. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
17 15
18 17
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
23JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 14 / Monday, January 23, 2023 / Notices
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGX–2023–001 and
should be submitted on or before
February 13, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–01117 Filed 1–20–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–96672; File No. SR–CBOE–
2023–001]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Update the Cboe Data
Services, LLC Fee Schedule
January 17, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January 3,
2023, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) proposes to update
the Cboe Data Services, LLC Fee
Schedule. The text of the proposed rule
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Jan 20, 2023
Jkt 259001
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatory
Home.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Cboe Data Services, LLC (‘‘CDS’’) Fee
Schedule, effective January 3, 2023. The
Exchange proposes to modify its fees
relating to the distribution of the BBO
data feed.3 Particularly, the Exchange
proposes to modify the BBO Data Fee
and Display Only User Fee, eliminate a
fee waiver for takers of BBO Data, and
adopt a BBO Enterprise Fee. The
Exchange also proposes to rename the
‘‘BBO data feed’’ to ‘‘Cboe Options Top
Data Feed’’ (or ‘‘Cboe Options Top
Data’’), and use the proposed name
herein, in order to align with the
naming convention used by the
Exchange’s affiliated options exchanges
for similar data products.4
The Exchange first proposes to modify
the current monthly Data Fee for Cboe
3 The BBO Data Feed is a real-time data feed that
includes the following information: (i) outstanding
quotes and standing orders at the best available
price level on each side of the market; (ii) executed
trades time, size, and price; (iii) totals of customer
versus non-customer contracts at the best bid and
offer (‘‘BBO’’); (iv) all-or-none contingency orders
priced better than or equal to the BBO; (v) expected
opening price and expected opening size; (vi) endof-day summaries by product, including open, high,
low, and closing price during the trading session;
(vi) recap messages any time there is a change in
the open, high, low or last sale price of a listed
option; (vii) COB information; and (viii) product IDs
and codes for all listed options contracts. The quote
and last sale data contained in the BBO data feed
is identical to the data sent to the Options Price
Reporting Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) for redistribution to
the public. This data feed is made available by the
Exchange’s affiliate CDS.
4 See Cboe BZX Options Fee Schedule and Cboe
EDGX Options Fee Schedule.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4061
Options Top Data. Currently, the
Exchange assesses a ‘‘Data Fee’’, payable
by a Customer, of $9,000 per month for
internal use and external redistribution
of the Cboe Options Top Data Feed.5
The Data Fee entitles a Customer to
provide the Cboe Options Top Data to
an unlimited number of internal users
and Devices 6 within the Customer. A
Customer receiving the Cboe Options
Top Data Feed from another Customer
or directly from the Exchange is
assessed the Data Fee by the Exchange
pursuant to its own market data
agreement with CDS and is entitled to
use the Data internally and/or distribute
it externally. All Customers have the
same rights to utilize the data internally
and/or distribute it externally as long as
the Customer has entered into a written
agreement with CDS for the data and
pays the Data Fee. The Exchange now
proposes to adopt separate fees for
internal and external distribution (and
codify the definitions of Internal and
External Distributors in the CDS Fee
Schedule).7 Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to maintain the current
monthly fee of $9,000 for internal
distribution but adopt a reduced fee of
$5,000 per month for external
distribution.
The Exchange next proposes to
modify its current User Fees. The
Exchange currently charges a ‘‘User
Fee’’, payable by a Customer, of $50 per
month per Device or user ID for use of
the data in the Cboe Options Top Data
Feed by ‘‘Display Only Service’’ 8 users.
The current User fee is payable only for
‘‘external’’ Display Only Service users
5 A ‘‘Customer’’ is any person, company or other
entity that, pursuant to a market data agreement
with CDS, is entitled to receive data, either directly
from CDS or through an authorized redistributor
(i.e., a Customer or an extranet service provider),
whether that data is distributed externally or used
internally. A third-party vendor of an Approved
Third-Party Device, as defined in the CDS Fee
Schedule, is not a Customer unless it has a market
data agreement in place with CDS. A Floor Broker
User, as defined in the CDS Fee Schedule, is not
a Customer unless it has a market data agreement
in place with CDS.
6 A ‘‘Device’’ means any computer, workstation or
other item of equipment, fixed or portable, that
receives, accesses and/or displays data in visual,
audible or other form.
7 An Internal Distributor of an Exchange market
data product is a Distributor that receives the
Exchange market data product and then distributes
that data to one or more Users within the
Distributor’s own entity. An External Distributor of
an Exchange market data product is a Distributor
that receives the Exchange Market Data product and
then distributes that data to a third party or one or
more Users outside the Distributor’s own entity.
8 Display Only Service allows a natural person
end-user to view and manipulate data using the
Customer’s computerized service, but not to save,
copy, export or transfer the data or any results of
the manipulation to any other computer hardware,
software or media, except for printing it to paper
or other non-magnetic media.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4058-4061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01117]
[[Page 4058]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-96677; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2023-001]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Fee Schedule
January 17, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 3, 2023, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule chanege as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX Options'')
proposes to amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule, effective January
3, 2023. The Exchange proposes to modify its market data fees for EDGX
Options Top.\3\ Particularly, the Exchange proposes to modify the
Professional and Non-Professional User Fees and adopt a new Enterprise
Fee for EDGX Options Top.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EDGX Options Top is an uncompressed data feed that offers
top of book quotations and execution information based on options
orders entered into the System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange first proposes to reduce the Professional and Non-
Professional User fees for EDGX Options Top. The Exchange currently
charges Internal Distributors and External Distributors that
redistribute any of the EDGX Options Data Feeds different fees for
their Professional Users \4\ and Non-Professional Users.\5\ The
Exchange currently assesses a monthly fee for Professional Users of
$10.00 per User and a monthly fee of $1.00 per Non-Professional
User.\6\ Further, the Fee Schedule provides that Users of any one of
EDGX Options market data products (i.e., EDGX Options Top, EDGX Options
Depth, EDGX Options Auction Feed, EDGX Options Complex Depth, EDGX
Options Complex Top, and EDGX Options Complex Auction Fees) may
receive, at no additional charge, access to any or all of the other
market data products listed. The Exchange proposes to reduce the User
fees for EDGX Options Top. Particularly, the Exchange proposes to
reduce the monthly (i) Professional User fee from $10 per user to $5
per user and (ii) Non-Professional User fee from $1.00 per user to
$0.10 per user. The Exchange also proposes to start charging separate
User fees for EDGX Options Top. User Fees for the Exchange's remaining
market data products will continue to receive, at no additional charge,
access to any or all of the other market data products lists (with the
exception of EDGX Options Top. The Exchange has reformatted the Market
Data Fees table to make this clear.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A Professional User of an Exchange Market Data product is
any User other than a Non-Professional User.
\5\ A ``Non-Professional User'' of an Exchange Market Data
product is a natural person or qualifying trust that uses Data only
for personal purposes and not for any commercial purpose and, for a
natural person who works in the United States, is not: (i)
registered or qualified in any capacity with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, any
state securities agency, any securities exchange or association, or
any commodities or futures contract market or association; (ii)
engaged as an ``investment adviser'' as that term is defined in
Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (whether
or not registered or qualified under that Act); or (iii) employed by
a bank or other organization exempt from registration under federal
or state securities laws to perform functions that would require
registration or qualification if such functions were performed for
an organization not so exempt; or, for a natural person who works
outside of the United States, does not perform the same functions as
would disqualify such person as a Non-Professional User if he or she
worked in the United States.
\6\ Distributors that receive EDGX Options Data Feeds are
required to count every Professional User and Non-Professional User
to which they provide the market data product(s).
\7\ The Exchange is not proposing any changes to the current
User Fee rates for its other market data products at this time and
Users of any one of the remaining market data products may continue
to receive, at no additional charge, access to any or all of the
other market data products listed (i.e., except for EDGX Options
Top).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange lastly proposes to establish a $20,000 per month
Enterprise Fee that will permit a recipient firm who receives EDGX
Options Top Data from a Distributor to receive the data for an
unlimited number of Professional and Non-Professional Users. The
Enterprise Fee is an alternative to User fees and will permit a
recipient firm who receives EDGX Options Top Data from a Distributor to
pay a flat fee to receive the data for an unlimited number of
Professional and Non-Professional Users, which the Exchange proposes to
make clear in the Fee Schedule. The Enterprise Fee may provide a
recipient an opportunity to reduce its fees. For example, if a
recipient firm has 15,000 Professional Users who each receive EDGX
Options Top at $5.00 per month (as proposed), then that recipient firm
will pay $75,000 per month in Professional Users fees. If the recipient
firm instead were to purchase the proposed Enterprise license, the
recipient firm would alternatively pay a flat fee of $20,000 for an
unlimited number of Professional and Non-Professional Users. A
recipient firm must pay a separate Enterprise Fee for each Distributor
that controls the display of EDGX Options Top if it wishes such User to
be covered by an Enterprise Fee rather than by per User fees. A
recipient firm that pays the Enterprise Fee will not have to report its
number of such Users on a monthly basis. Rather, every six months, the
recipient firm must provide the Exchange with a count of the total
number of authorized person users of each product, including both
Professional and Non-Professional Users. The Exchange notes that the
purchase of an Enterprise license is
[[Page 4059]]
voluntary, and a firm may elect to instead use the per User structure
and benefit from the proposed per User Fees described above. For
example, a firm that does not have a sufficient number of subscribers
to benefit from purchase of the license need not do so.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\10\ which requires that Exchange rules
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its Members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
environment. Indeed, there are currently 16 registered options
exchanges that trade options. Based on publicly available information,
no single options exchange has more than 18% of the market share.\11\
The Exchange believes top-of-book quotation and transaction data is
highly competitive as national securities exchanges compete vigorously
with each other to provide efficient, reliable, and low-cost data to a
wide range of investors and market participants. Indeed, there are
several competing products offered by other national securities
exchanges today, not counting products offered by the Exchange's
affiliates, and each of the Exchange's affiliated U.S. options
exchanges also offers similar top-of-book data.\12\ Each of those
exchanges offer top-of-book quotation and last sale information based
on their own quotation and trading activity that is substantially
similar to the information provided by the Exchange through the EDGX
Options Top Feed. Further, the quote and last sale data contained in
the EDGX Options Top Feed is identical to the data sent to OPRA for
redistribution to the public.\13\ Accordingly, market participants can
substitute EDGX Options Top with feeds from other exchanges and/or
through OPRA. Exchange top-of-book data is therefore widely available
today from a number of different sources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market Month-to-Date
Volume Summary (December 27, 2022), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/market_statistics/.
\12\ See e.g.,, NYSE Arca Options Proprietary Market Data Fees
Schedule, MIAX Options Exchange, Fee Schedule, Section 6 (Market
Data Fees), Nasdaq PHLX Options 7 Pricing Schedule, Section 10
(Proprietary Data Feed Fees) and Cboe Data Services, LLC Fees
Schedule.
\13\ The Exchange notes that it makes available to ``Customers''
the BBO data and last sale data that is included in the EDGX Options
Top Data Feed no earlier than the time at which the Exchange sends
that data to OPRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, the EDGX Options Top is distributed and purchased on a
voluntary basis, in that neither the Exchange nor market data
distributors are required by any rule or regulation to make this data
available. Accordingly, Distributors and Users can discontinue use at
any time and for any reason, including due to an assessment of the
reasonableness of fees charged. As described above, market participants
have a wide variety of alternative market data products from which to
choose, such as similar proprietary data products offered by other
exchanges and consolidated data. Further, the Exchange is not required
to make any proprietary data products available or to offer any
specific pricing alternatives to any customers. Moreover, all broker-
dealers involved in order routing must take consolidated data from
OPRA, and proprietary data feeds cannot be used to meet that particular
requirement. As such, all proprietary data feeds are optional.
The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities markets. Particularly, in
Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \14\ Making
similar data products available to market participants fosters
competition in the marketplace, and constrains the ability of exchanges
to charge supracompetitive fees. In the event that a market participant
views one exchange's data product as more or less attractive than the
competition they can and do switch between similar products. The
proposed fees are a result of the competitive environment, as the
Exchange seeks to adopt fees to attract purchasers of EDGX Options Top
Data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed changes to reduce the current
Professional and Non-Professional User fees are reasonable as recipient
firms will be subject to lower User fees. Additionally, the User fees
continue to be lower than User fees assessed by other exchanges for
similar data.\15\ The Exchange believes that the proposed fees are
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because they will be charged
uniformly to recipient firms and Users. The Exchange also believes
continuing to offer EDGX Options Top Data to Non-Professional Users at
a lower cost than Professional Users results in greater equity among
data recipients, as Professional Users are categorized as such based on
their employment and participation in financial markets, and thus, are
compensated to participate in the markets. Although Non-Professional
Users too can receive significant financial benefits through their
participation in the markets, the Exchange believes it is reasonable to
charge more to those Users who are more directly engaged in the
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See e.g., Nasdaq PHLX Options 7 Pricing Schedule, Section
10 (Proprietary Data Feed Fees), which provides for a fee of $40 per
month to professional users and $1.00 per month to non-professional
users of Top of PHLX Options (TOPO) Data. See also NYSE American
Options Proprietary Market Data Fees schedule, which provides for a
fee of $50 per month to professional users and $1.00 per month to
non-professional users of American Options Top Data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed change to start charging
separate User fees for EDGX Options Top is equitable and reasonable
because the Exchange has not charged for separate User Fees for both
feeds since EDGX Options Top was adopted in January 2018 and the
Exchange now wishes to have separate User fees for EDGX Options
Top.\16\ Moreover, the remaining EDGX Options data products are purely
optional. Only those Customers that deem the products
[[Page 4060]]
to be of sufficient overall value and usefulness would purchase them.
Additionally, the Exchange is not required to provide any User fee
waiver to any Distributors of EDGX Options Top. The Exchange believes
the proposed change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as it
will apply uniformly to recipient firms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82462 (January 12,
2018), 83 FR 1647 (January 8, 2018) (SR-CboeEDGX-2017-010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed Enterprise Fee for EDGX Options Top Feed is equitable
and reasonable as the proposed fee could result in a fee reduction for
recipient firms with a large number of Professional and Non-
Professional Users. If a recipient firm has a smaller number of
Professional Users of EDGX Options Top Data, then it may continue using
the per User structure and benefit from the proposed per User Fee
reductions. By reducing prices for recipient firms with a large number
of Professional and Non-Professional Users, the Exchange believes that
more firms may choose to receive and to distribute EDGX Options Top
Data, thereby expanding the distribution of this market data for the
benefit of investors.
The Exchange further believes that the proposed Enterprise Fee is
reasonable because it will simplify reporting for certain recipients
that have large numbers of Professional and Non-Professional Users.
Firms that pay the proposed Enterprise Fee will not have to report the
number of Users on a monthly basis as they currently do, but rather
will only have to count authorized users every six months, which is a
significant reduction in administrative burden. Finally, as described
above the Enterprise Fee is entirely optional. A firm that does not
have a sufficient number of subscribers to benefit from purchase of the
license need not do so.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange
operates in a highly competitive environment, and its ability to price
top-of-book data is constrained by competition among exchanges that
offer similar data products to their customers. Top-of-book data is
broadly disseminated by competing U.S. options exchanges and through
OPRA. There are therefore a number of alternative products available to
market participants and investors, including products offered by
certain competing exchanges. In this competitive environment potential
subscribers are free to choose which competing product to purchase to
satisfy their need for market information. Often, the choice comes down
to price, as market data customers look to purchase cheaper data
products, and quality, as market participants seek to purchase data
that represents significant market liquidity.
The Exchange believes that the proposed fees do not put any market
participants at a relative disadvantage compared to other market
participants. As discussed, the proposed fees would apply to all
similarly situated recipient firms of EDGX Options Top on an equal and
non-discriminatory basis. The Exchange believes the differentiated fees
for Professional and Non-Professional Users of EDGX Options Top is
appropriate given Professional Users are categorized as such based on
their employment and participation in financial markets, and thus, are
compensated to participate in the markets. Non-Professional Users too
can receive significant financial benefits through their participation
in the markets, however the Exchange believes it is reasonable to
charge more to those Users who are more directly engaged in the
markets. The Exchange therefore believes that the proposed fee neither
favors nor penalizes one or more categories of market participants in a
manner that would impose an undue burden on competition.
The Exchange believes that the proposed fees do not impose a burden
on competition or on other SROs that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In particular, market
participants are not forced to subscribe to EDGX Options Top, or any of
the Exchange's data feeds, as described above. Also as described above,
there are numerous substitute products offered by other national
securities exchanges, as well as OPRA. Because market data customers
can find suitable substitute feeds, an exchange that overprices its
market data products stands a high risk that users may substitute
another product. These competitive pressures ensure that no one
exchange's market data fees can impose an undue burden on competition,
and the Exchange's proposed fees do not do so here.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \18\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2023-001 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2023-001. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
[[Page 4061]]
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2023-001 and should
be submitted on or before February 13, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-01117 Filed 1-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P