Certain Quartz Surface Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2021, 1188-1190 [2023-00149]
Download as PDF
1188
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
each mission participant. Interpreter
and driver services can be arranged for
additional cost. Delegation members
will be able to take advantage of U.S.
Embassy rates for hotel rooms.
If an applicant is selected to
participate on a particular mission, a
payment to the Department of
Commerce in the amount of the
designated participation fee is required.
Upon notification of acceptance to
participate, those selected have 5
business days to submit payment or the
acceptance may be revoked.
Participants selected for a trade
mission will be expected to pay for the
cost of personal expenses, including,
but not limited to, international travel,
lodging, meals, transportation,
communication, and incidentals, unless
otherwise noted. Participants will,
however, be able to take advantage of
U.S. Government rates for hotel rooms.
In the event that a mission is cancelled,
no personal expenses paid in
anticipation of a mission will be
reimbursed. However, participation fees
for a cancelled mission will be
reimbursed to the extent they have not
already been expended in anticipation
of the mission.
If a visa is required to travel on a
particular mission, applying for and
obtaining such a visa will be the
responsibility of the mission
participant. Government fees and
processing expenses to obtain such a
visa are not included in the
participation fee. However, the
Department of Commerce will provide
instructions to each participant on the
procedures required to obtain business
visas.
Trade mission members participate in
trade missions and undertake missionrelated travel at their own risk. The
nature of the security situation in a
given foreign market at a given time
cannot be guaranteed. The U.S.
Government does not make any
representations or guarantees as to the
safety or security of participants. The
U.S. Department of State issues U.S.
Government international travel alerts
and warnings for U.S. citizens available
at https://travel.state.gov/content/
passports/en/alertswarnings.html. Any
question regarding insurance coverage
must be resolved by the participant and
its insurer of choice.
Timeframe for Recruitment and
Applications
Mission recruitment will be
conducted in an open and public
manner, including publication in the
Federal Register, posting on the
Department of Commerce trade mission
calendar (https://export.gov/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
trademissions) and other internet
websites, press releases to general and
trade media, direct mail, notices by
industry trade associations and other
multiplier groups, and publicity at
industry meetings, symposia,
conferences, and trade shows.
Recruitment for the mission will
conclude on January 27, 2023. The
Department of Commerce will review
applications on a rolling basis and
inform applicants of selection decisions
on a comparative basis. Applications
received after January 27, 2023, will be
considered only if space and scheduling
constraints permit.
Contacts
Larry Tabash (Recruitment Lead), Global
Team Lead, Middle East & Africa, +1
512–936–0039, Larry.Tabash@
trade.gov
Deb Carey (Project Lead), International
Trade Specialist, +1 202–830–5545,
Deborah.Carey@trade.gov
U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service—
Nairobi Team
Leone Mutoka, Commercial Assistant,
+254–20–363–6438, Leone.Mutoka@
trade.gov
Judy Magondu, Commercial Assistant,
+254 (20) 363–6400, Judy.Magondu@
trade.gov
Josh Startup, Commercial Officer, +254–
20–363–6000 ext. 6424,
Joshua.Startup@trade.gov
Feleke Assefa, Senior Commercial
Officer, +254–20–363–6000 ext. 6424,
Feleke.Assefa@trade.gov
U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service—
Dar es Salaam Team
Ken Walsh, Senior Commercial Officer,
+255–22–229–4243, Ken.walsh@
trade.gov
Athanas Lupatu, Commercial Specialist,
+255–22–229–4341,
Athanasius.lupatu@trade.gov
Gemal Brangman,
Director, ITA Events Management Task Force.
[FR Doc. 2023–00114 Filed 1–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–889]
Certain Quartz Surface Products From
India: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2019–
2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
certain quartz surface products (QSP)
from India was sold in the United States
at less than normal value during the
period of review (POR), December 13,
2019, through May 31, 2021.
DATES: Applicable January 9, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Lindgren or Charles Doss, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1671 or (202) 482–4474,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On July 8, 2022, Commerce published
the Preliminary Results for this review
in the Federal Register and invited
interested parties to comment on those
results.1 Between August 17 and 24,
2022, Commerce received case briefs on
behalf of Cambria Company LLC (the
petitioner), Antique Group,2 Arizona
Tile et al.,3 Architectural Surfaces
Group, LLC, DSG et al.,4 Federation of
Indian Quartz Surface Industry (the
Federation), GlobalFair Technologies
Pvt., and Jessie-Kan et al.5 6
Subsequently, the petitioner, Arizona
Tile et al., the Federation, and Pokarna
Engineered Stone Limited (PESL) each
submitted rebuttal briefs on August 25,
2022.7 In addition, between August 15
and 17, 2022, certain other parties filed
letters in lieu of case briefs.8
1 See Certain Quartz Surface Products from India:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–
2021, 87 FR 40786 (July 8, 2022) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
2 Antique Marbonite Private Limited, India;
Shivam Enterprises and Prism Johnson Limited
(collectively, Antique Group).
3 Arizona Tile, M S International, Inc. and PNS
Clearance LLC (collectively, Arizona Tile et al.).
4 DivyaShakti Granites Limited, DivyaShakti
Limited, Quartzkraft LLP,Marudhar Rocks
International Pvt. Ltd, International Stones India
Pvt. Ltd, Aro Granite Industries, Ltd, Paradigm
Granite Pvt., Ltd and Paradigm Stone India Pvt.
Ltd., Indian Exporters and Producers, and U.S.
Importers Cosmos Granite (West) LLC, Cosmos
Granite (South East) LLC, Cosmos Granite (South
West) LLC, Dwyer Marble & Stone, and OHM
International (collectively, DSG et al.).
5 Jessie-Kan Granite Incorporated, Hilltop Stones
Pvt. Ltd. and Colors of Rainbow; and Jessie-Kan
Granite Inc. (collectively, Jessie-Kan et al.).
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Quartz Surface
Products from India: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2021,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
7 Id.
8 Id.
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Notices
Commerce extended the deadline for
the final results on October 14, 2022, by
31 days and on November 30, 2022, by
29 days.9 The deadline for the final
results of this review is now January 4,
2023. For a complete description of the
events that occurred since the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.10
ability.13 Therefore, as in the
Preliminary Results, as AFA, we
assigned Antique Group a dumping
margin of 323.12 percent. See the Issues
and Decision Memorandum for further
discussion.14
Rates for Companies Not Selected for
Individual Examination
The statute and Commerce’s
Scope of the Order 11
regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to
The products covered by the Order
individual companies not selected for
are QSP from India. For a complete
examination when Commerce limits its
description of the scope, see the Issues
examination in an administrative review
and Decision Memorandum.
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the
Analysis of Comments Received
Act. Generally, Commerce looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
All issues raised in the case and
provides instructions for calculating the
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
all-others rate in an investigation, for
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
guidance when calculating the rate for
list of the issues that parties raised and
companies which we did not examine
to which we responded in the Issues
in an administrative review.
and Decision Memorandum is attached
When the rates for individually
at Appendix I to this notice. The Issues
examined companies are all zero, de
and Decision Memorandum is a public
minimis, or based entirely on facts
document and is on file electronically
available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
provides that Commerce may use ‘‘any
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
reasonable method’’ to establish the allCentralized Electronic Service System
others rate.
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
We calculated a zero percent dumping
registered users at https://
margin for one of the mandatory
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete respondents in this review, PESL, and
version of the Issues and Decision
we based the dumping margin on facts
Memorandum can be accessed directly
available with an adverse inference for
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
the other mandatory respondent,
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Antique Group. Upon further review,
Commerce has determined that a
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
reasonable method to establish the rate
Based on our review of the record and for the 51 non-selected companies
comments received from interested
subject to this administrative review is
parties regarding the Preliminary
by relying on the all-others rate
Results, we made certain changes to the calculated in the initial investigation of
margin calculation for PESL, as well as
this Order,15 consistent with the
the selection of the rate for non-selected guidance in section 735(c)(5)(B) of the
companies. For a discussion of these
Act.16 These 51 exporters are listed in
changes, see the Issues and Decision
Appendix II. For additional discussion,
Memorandum.12
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
Final Results of Review
We continue to find that the
application of facts available with an
Commerce determines that the
following weighted-average dumping
adverse inference (AFA), pursuant to
margins exist for the period December
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act
13, 2019, through May 31, 2021:
of 1930, as amended (the Act), is
warranted in determining Antique
13 See Preliminary Results.
Group’s dumping margin because it
14 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
failed to cooperate to the best of its
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
9 See
Memoranda, ‘‘Extension of Time Limit for
the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 2019–2021,’’ dated October
14, 2022; and ‘‘Extension of Time Limit for the
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 2019–2021,’’ dated November 30, 2022.
10 See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
11 See Certain Quartz Surface Products from India
and Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 85 FR
37422 (June 22, 2020) (Order).
12 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comments 1 and 5.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
Comment 4.
15 See Certain Quartz Surface Products from
India: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of
Critical Circumstances, 85 FR 25391, 25392 (May 1,
2020) (Final Determination); see also Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 5.
16 See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from
France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United
Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews
in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008),
and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 16.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Producer and/or exporter
Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited ..........................................
Antique Marbonite Private Limited, India/Shivam Enterprises
(Shivam)/Prism Johnson Limited (Prism Johnson) ...............
Non-Selected Companies ...........
1189
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
0.00
323.12
3.19
Assessment Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review. Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for
PESL, we calculated importer-specific
antidumping duty assessment rates by
aggregating the total amount of dumping
calculated for the examined sales of
each importer and dividing each of
these amounts by the total entered value
associated with those sales. Where
either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties. Commerce’s
‘‘automatic assessment’’ will apply to
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR produced by PESL for which it
did not know that the merchandise it
sold to an intermediary (e.g., a reseller,
trading company, or exporter) was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
Because we are applying total AFA to
Antique Group, we will instruct CBP to
apply an assessment rate to all entries
Antique Group produced and/or
exported equal to the dumping margin
indicated above in the ‘‘Final Results of
Review.’’ Further, the assessment rate
for antidumping duties for each of the
companies not selected for individual
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
1190
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Notices
examination will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
identified above in the ‘‘Final Results of
Review.’’
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash deposit rates for the companies
identified above in the ‘‘Final Results of
Review’’ section will be equal to the
company-specific weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2)
for merchandise exported by a company
not covered in this administrative
review but covered in a completed prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review or
completed prior segment of this
proceeding but the producer is, the cash
deposit rate will be the companyspecific rate established for the most
recently-completed segment of this
proceeding for the producer of the
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be 1.02
percent, the rate established in the
investigation of this proceeding.17 These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties has occurred and
the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties, and/or an increase
in the amount of antidumping duties by
the amount of the countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
17 See
Final Determination, 85 FR at 25392.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(1).
Dated: December 30, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Source of PESL’s Constructed
Value (CV) Information
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should
Accept Antique Group’s Supplemental
Questionnaire Response
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Continue to Apply AFA to Antique
Group
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should
Continue to Rely on the Petition Rate for
the AFA Rate
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should
Rely on a Different Method for Selecting
the Non-Selected Company Rate
Comment 6: Changes to Preliminary Draft
Customs Instructions
VI. Recommendation
Appendix II
List of Companies Not Selected for
Individual Examination
Alicante Surfaces Pvt., Ltd.
Antique Granito Shareholders Trust
Argil Ceramic Private Limited
ARO Granite Industries Limited
Asian Granito India Ltd
Baba Super Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
Camrola Quartz Limited
Chaitanya International Minerals LLP
Chariot International Pvt. Ltd.
Colors Of Rainbow
Creative Quartz LLP
Cuarzo
Divyashakti Granites Limited
Esprit Stones Pvt., Ltd.
Globalfair Technologies Pvt.
Glowstone Industries Private Limited
Gupta Marbles
Gyan Chand Lodha
Hi Elite Quartz LLP
Hilltop Stones Pvt., Ltd.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Inani Marbles and Industries Ltd.
International Stones India Private Limited
Jennex Granite Industries
Jessie Kan Granite Inc.
Keros Stone LLP
M.B. Granites Private Ltd.
Mahi Granites Private Limited.
Malbros Marbles & Granites Industries
Marudhar Rocks International Pvt. Ltd.
Mountmine Imp. & Exp. Pvt., Ltd.
P.M. Quartz Surfaces Pvt., Ltd.
Pacific Industries Limited
Pacific Quartz Surfaces LLP
Pangaea Stone International Private Ltd.
Paradigm Granite Pvt., Ltd.
Paradigm Stone India Private Limited
Pelican Quartz Stone
Quartzkraft LLP
Rocks Forever
Rose Marbles Ltd.
Safayar Ceramics Private Ltd.
Satya Exports
Southern Rocks and Minerals Private Limited
Stone Imp. & Exp. (India) Pvt., Ltd.
Stoneby India LLP
Sunex Stones Private Ltd.
Tab India Granites Pvt., Ltd.
Ultima International
Vishwas Ceramic
Vishwas Exp.
Yash Gems
[FR Doc. 2023–00149 Filed 1–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[RTID 0648–XC562]
Nominations for the Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries Commission
Permanent Advisory Committee
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of request for
nominations.
AGENCY:
NMFS, on behalf of the
Secretary of Commerce, is seeking
nominations for the advisory committee
established under the Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries Convention
Implementation Act. The Permanent
Advisory Committee, composed of
individuals from groups concerned with
the fisheries covered by the Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries Convention
(Convention), provides
recommendations to the U.S.
Commissioners to the Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries Commission
(Commission) regarding the
deliberations and decisions of the
Commission.
SUMMARY:
Nominations must be received
no later than February 23, 2023.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1188-1190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00149]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-889]
Certain Quartz Surface Products From India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2021
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
certain quartz surface products (QSP) from India was sold in the United
States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR),
December 13, 2019, through May 31, 2021.
DATES: Applicable January 9, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Lindgren or Charles Doss, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1671 or (202) 482-4474,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 8, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results for
this review in the Federal Register and invited interested parties to
comment on those results.\1\ Between August 17 and 24, 2022, Commerce
received case briefs on behalf of Cambria Company LLC (the petitioner),
Antique Group,\2\ Arizona Tile et al.,\3\ Architectural Surfaces Group,
LLC, DSG et al.,\4\ Federation of Indian Quartz Surface Industry (the
Federation), GlobalFair Technologies Pvt., and Jessie-Kan et
al.5 6 Subsequently, the petitioner, Arizona Tile et al.,
the Federation, and Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited (PESL) each
submitted rebuttal briefs on August 25, 2022.\7\ In addition, between
August 15 and 17, 2022, certain other parties filed letters in lieu of
case briefs.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Quartz Surface Products from India: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2021, 87
FR 40786 (July 8, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ Antique Marbonite Private Limited, India; Shivam Enterprises
and Prism Johnson Limited (collectively, Antique Group).
\3\ Arizona Tile, M S International, Inc. and PNS Clearance LLC
(collectively, Arizona Tile et al.).
\4\ DivyaShakti Granites Limited, DivyaShakti Limited,
Quartzkraft LLP,Marudhar Rocks International Pvt. Ltd, International
Stones India Pvt. Ltd, Aro Granite Industries, Ltd, Paradigm Granite
Pvt., Ltd and Paradigm Stone India Pvt. Ltd., Indian Exporters and
Producers, and U.S. Importers Cosmos Granite (West) LLC, Cosmos
Granite (South East) LLC, Cosmos Granite (South West) LLC, Dwyer
Marble & Stone, and OHM International (collectively, DSG et al.).
\5\ Jessie-Kan Granite Incorporated, Hilltop Stones Pvt. Ltd.
and Colors of Rainbow; and Jessie-Kan Granite Inc. (collectively,
Jessie-Kan et al.).
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Quartz Surface Products from
India: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2021,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
\7\ Id.
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 1189]]
Commerce extended the deadline for the final results on October 14,
2022, by 31 days and on November 30, 2022, by 29 days.\9\ The deadline
for the final results of this review is now January 4, 2023. For a
complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary
Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Memoranda, ``Extension of Time Limit for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2019-2021,''
dated October 14, 2022; and ``Extension of Time Limit for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2019-2021,''
dated November 30, 2022.
\10\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Certain Quartz Surface Products from India and Turkey:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 85 FR 37422 (June 22, 2020) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the Order are QSP from India. For a
complete description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties
raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
is attached at Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding the Preliminary Results, we made certain
changes to the margin calculation for PESL, as well as the selection of
the rate for non-selected companies. For a discussion of these changes,
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 1 and 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use of Adverse Facts Available
We continue to find that the application of facts available with an
adverse inference (AFA), pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), is warranted in determining
Antique Group's dumping margin because it failed to cooperate to the
best of its ability.\13\ Therefore, as in the Preliminary Results, as
AFA, we assigned Antique Group a dumping margin of 323.12 percent. See
the Issues and Decision Memorandum for further discussion.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Preliminary Results.
\14\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rates for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to individual companies not
selected for examination when Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act.
Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies
which we did not examine in an administrative review.
When the rates for individually examined companies are all zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of
the Act provides that Commerce may use ``any reasonable method'' to
establish the all-others rate.
We calculated a zero percent dumping margin for one of the
mandatory respondents in this review, PESL, and we based the dumping
margin on facts available with an adverse inference for the other
mandatory respondent, Antique Group. Upon further review, Commerce has
determined that a reasonable method to establish the rate for the 51
non-selected companies subject to this administrative review is by
relying on the all-others rate calculated in the initial investigation
of this Order,\15\ consistent with the guidance in section 735(c)(5)(B)
of the Act.\16\ These 51 exporters are listed in Appendix II. For
additional discussion, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Certain Quartz Surface Products from India: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 85 FR 25391, 25392 (May 1,
2020) (Final Determination); see also Issues and Decision Memorandum
at Comment 5.
\16\ See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France,
Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews in
Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period December 13, 2019, through May 31, 2021:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer and/or exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited............................ 0.00
Antique Marbonite Private Limited, India/Shivam Enterprises 323.12
(Shivam)/Prism Johnson Limited (Prism Johnson).............
Non-Selected Companies...................................... 3.19
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for PESL, we calculated importer-
specific antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total
amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer
and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value
associated with those sales. Where either the respondent's weighted-
average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19
CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or
de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce's ``automatic
assessment'' will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the
POR produced by PESL for which it did not know that the merchandise it
sold to an intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or
exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
Because we are applying total AFA to Antique Group, we will
instruct CBP to apply an assessment rate to all entries Antique Group
produced and/or exported equal to the dumping margin indicated above in
the ``Final Results of Review.'' Further, the assessment rate for
antidumping duties for each of the companies not selected for
individual
[[Page 1190]]
examination will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
identified above in the ``Final Results of Review.''
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for the companies
identified above in the ``Final Results of Review'' section will be
equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by a company not covered in this administrative
review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding;
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or completed
prior segment of this proceeding but the producer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the company-specific rate established for the most
recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to be 1.02 percent, the rate
established in the investigation of this proceeding.\17\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Final Determination, 85 FR at 25392.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties has
occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties,
and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of
the countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5)
and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Dated: December 30, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Source of PESL's Constructed Value (CV) Information
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Accept Antique Group's
Supplemental Questionnaire Response
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Apply AFA to
Antique Group
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Rely on the
Petition Rate for the AFA Rate
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Rely on a Different Method
for Selecting the Non-Selected Company Rate
Comment 6: Changes to Preliminary Draft Customs Instructions
VI. Recommendation
Appendix II
List of Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
Alicante Surfaces Pvt., Ltd.
Antique Granito Shareholders Trust
Argil Ceramic Private Limited
ARO Granite Industries Limited
Asian Granito India Ltd
Baba Super Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
Camrola Quartz Limited
Chaitanya International Minerals LLP
Chariot International Pvt. Ltd.
Colors Of Rainbow
Creative Quartz LLP
Cuarzo
Divyashakti Granites Limited
Esprit Stones Pvt., Ltd.
Globalfair Technologies Pvt.
Glowstone Industries Private Limited
Gupta Marbles
Gyan Chand Lodha
Hi Elite Quartz LLP
Hilltop Stones Pvt., Ltd.
Inani Marbles and Industries Ltd.
International Stones India Private Limited
Jennex Granite Industries
Jessie Kan Granite Inc.
Keros Stone LLP
M.B. Granites Private Ltd.
Mahi Granites Private Limited.
Malbros Marbles & Granites Industries
Marudhar Rocks International Pvt. Ltd.
Mountmine Imp. & Exp. Pvt., Ltd.
P.M. Quartz Surfaces Pvt., Ltd.
Pacific Industries Limited
Pacific Quartz Surfaces LLP
Pangaea Stone International Private Ltd.
Paradigm Granite Pvt., Ltd.
Paradigm Stone India Private Limited
Pelican Quartz Stone
Quartzkraft LLP
Rocks Forever
Rose Marbles Ltd.
Safayar Ceramics Private Ltd.
Satya Exports
Southern Rocks and Minerals Private Limited
Stone Imp. & Exp. (India) Pvt., Ltd.
Stoneby India LLP
Sunex Stones Private Ltd.
Tab India Granites Pvt., Ltd.
Ultima International
Vishwas Ceramic
Vishwas Exp.
Yash Gems
[FR Doc. 2023-00149 Filed 1-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P