Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Reduce GEMX's Options Regulatory Fee, 1308-1312 [2023-00118]
Download as PDF
1308
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Notices
securities, the issuer must affirmatively
state in the withdrawal application that
it plans to undertake a subsequent
private offering of its securities. Without
this statement, the Commission would
not be able to monitor a company’s
reliance on, and compliance with,
Securities Act Rule 155(c). We estimate
that approximately 327 issuers will file
Securities Act Rule 477 submissions
annually at an estimated one hour per
response for a total annual burden of
approximately 327 hours.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden imposed by the collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication by March 10, 2023.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Please direct your written comment to
David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o John
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: January 3, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
[Release No. 34–96598; File No. SR–GEMX–
2022–14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Reduce GEMX’s
Options Regulatory Fee
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
GEMX’s Pricing Schedule at Options 7,
Section 5 to reduce the GEMX Options
Regulatory Fee or ‘‘ORF’’.
While the changes proposed herein
are effective upon filing, the Exchange
has designated the amendments become
operative on February 1, 2023.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/gemx/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2023–00134 Filed 1–6–23; 8:45 am]
January 3, 2023.
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
22, 2022, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
1. Purpose
GEMX proposes to lower its ORF from
$0.0014 to $0.0013 per contract side on
February 1, 2023. Previously, GEMX has
filed to lower or waive its ORF in 2019,
2021 and 2022.3 After a review of its
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85140
(February 14, 2019), 84 FR 5511 (February 21, 2019)
(SR–GEMX–2019–01) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Amend the Options Regulatory Fee); 92698
(August 18, 2021), 86 FR 47355 (August 24, 2021)
(SR–GEMX–2021–08) (Notice of Filing and
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
regulatory revenues and regulatory
costs, the Exchange proposes to reduce
the ORF to ensure that revenue
collected from the ORF, in combination
with other regulatory fees and fines,
does not exceed the Exchange’s total
regulatory costs.
Volumes in the options industry went
over 900,000,000 total contracts as of
August 2022 and remained over that
threshold through November 2022.
GEMX has taken measures in prior years
to lower and waive its ORF to ensure
that revenue collected from the ORF, in
combination with other regulatory fees
and fines, does not exceed the
Exchange’s total regulatory costs.
Despite those prior measures, GEMX
will need to reduce its ORF again to
account for trading volumes in 2022. At
this time, GEMX believes that the
options volume it experienced in the
second half of 2022 is likely to persist
in 2023. The anticipated options volume
would continue to impact GEMX’s ORF
collection which, in turn, has caused
GEMX to propose reducing the ORF to
ensure that revenue collected from the
ORF, in combination with other
regulatory fees and fines, would not
exceed the Exchange’s total regulatory
costs.
Collection of ORF
GEMX will continue to assess its ORF
for each customer option transaction
that is either: (1) executed by a Member
on GEMX; or (2) cleared by an GEMX
Member at The Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) in the customer
range,4 even if the transaction was
executed by a non-Member of GEMX,
regardless of the exchange on which the
transaction occurs.5 If the OCC clearing
member is a GEMX Member, ORF is
assessed and collected on all cleared
customer contracts (after adjustment for
CMTA 6); and (2) if the OCC clearing
member is not a GEMX Member, ORF is
collected only on the cleared customer
contracts executed at GEMX, taking into
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
to Amend GEMX’s Options Regulatory Fee); and
94069 (January 26, 2022), 87 FR 5545 (February 1,
2022) (SR–GEMX–2022–03) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
To Reduce GEMX’s Options Regulatory Fee).
4 Participants must record the appropriate
account origin code on all orders at the time of
entry of the order. The Exchange represents that it
has surveillances in place to verify that members
mark orders with the correct account origin code.
5 The Exchange uses reports from OCC when
assessing and collecting the ORF.
6 CMTA or Clearing Member Trade Assignment is
a form of ‘‘give-up’’ whereby the position will be
assigned to a specific clearing firm at OCC.
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
1309
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Notices
account any CMTA instructions which
may result in collecting the ORF from a
non-Member.7
In the case where a Member both
executes a transaction and clears the
transaction, the ORF will be assessed to
and collected from that Member. In the
case where a Member executes a
transaction and a different Member
clears the transaction, the ORF will be
assessed to and collected from the
Member who clears the transaction and
not the Member who executes the
transaction. In the case where a nonMember executes a transaction at an
away market and a Member clears the
transaction, the ORF will be assessed to
and collected from the Member who
clears the transaction. In the case where
a Member executes a transaction on
GEMX and a non-Member clears the
transaction, the ORF will be assessed to
the Member that executed the
transaction on GEMX and collected
from the non-Member who cleared the
transaction. In the case where a Member
executes a transaction at an away
market and a non-Member clears the
transaction, the ORF will not be
assessed to the Member who executed
the transaction or collected from the
non-Member who cleared the
transaction because the Exchange does
not have access to the data to make
absolutely certain that ORF should
Jan2021
Feb2021
Mar2021
Apr2021
May2021
Jun2021
Jul2021
Aug2021
Sep2021
Oct2021
Nov2021
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Dec2021
Total Contracts
838,339,790
823,413,002
898,653,388
711,388,828
718,368,993
866,099,522
790,038,364
801,578,079
811,458,905
821,102,002
944,355,975
561,154,417
18:21 Jan 06, 2023
Proposal
Based on the Exchange’s most recent
review, the Exchange is proposing to
reduce the amount of ORF that will be
collected by the Exchange from $0.0014
per contract side to $0.0013 per contract
side. The Exchange issued an Options
Trader Alert on December 20, 2022
indicating the proposed rate change for
February 1, 2023.9
The proposed reduction is based on
current levels of options volume. The
below table displays monthly volume
from 2021.10
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Customer Sides Trading Days Quarter Contracts Quarter Cust Sides Quarter AOC Quarter Cust ADS
784,399,878
782,113,450
Jkt 259001
19
19
837,247,059
667,208,963
23
659,913,862
809,242,842
729,239,647
20
741,111,748
744,936,837
760,524,395
22
866,102,667
503,350,470
7 By way of example, if Broker A, a GEMX
Member, routes a customer order to CBOE and the
transaction executes on CBOE and clears in Broker
A’s OCC Clearing account, ORF will be collected by
GEMX from Broker A’s clearing account at OCC via
direct debit. While this transaction was executed on
a market other than GEMX, it was cleared by a
GEMX Member in the member’s OCC clearing
account in the customer range, therefore there is a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF
The Exchange monitors the amount of
revenue collected from the ORF to
ensure that it, in combination with other
regulatory fees and fines, does not
exceed regulatory costs. In determining
whether an expense is considered a
regulatory cost, the Exchange reviews
all costs and makes determinations if
there is a nexus between the expense
and a regulatory function. The Exchange
notes that fines collected by the
Exchange in connection with a
disciplinary matter offset ORF.
Revenue generated from ORF, when
combined with all of the Exchange’s
other regulatory fees and fines, is
designed to recover a material portion of
the regulatory costs to the Exchange of
the supervision and regulation of
member customer options business
including performing routine
surveillances, investigations,
examinations, financial monitoring, and
policy, rulemaking, interpretive, and
enforcement activities. Regulatory costs
include direct regulatory expenses and
certain indirect expenses in support of
the regulatory function. The direct
expenses include in-house and thirdparty service provider costs to support
the day-to-day regulatory work such as
surveillances, investigations and
examinations. The indirect expenses
include support from such areas as
Office of the General Counsel,
technology, and internal audit. Indirect
expenses were approximately 39% of
the total regulatory costs for 2022. Thus,
direct expenses were approximately
61% of total regulatory costs for 2022.8
The ORF is designed to recover a
material portion of the costs to the
Exchange of the supervision and
regulation of its Members, including
performing routine surveillances,
investigations, examinations, financial
monitoring, and policy, rulemaking,
interpretive, and enforcement activities.
2,560,406,180
2,403,760,387
41,973,872
39,405,908
2,295,857,343
2,136,365,667
36,442,180
33,910,566
2,403,075,348
2,215,288,232
37,548,052
34,613,879
2,326,612,394
2,129,977,532
42,302,044
38,72fi,8fi4
21
22
21
21
21
21
13
regulatory nexus between GEMX and the
transaction. If Broker A was not a GEMX Member,
then no ORF should be assessed and collected
because there is no nexus; the transaction did not
execute on GEMX nor was it cleared by a GEMX
Member.
8 The Exchange will finalize its 2023 Regulatory
Budget in the first quarter of 2023.
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
9 See
Options Trader Alert 2022–44.
OCC data from December 2021 numbers
reflect only 13 trading days as this information is
through December 17, 2021. Volume data in the
table represents numbers of contracts; each contract
has two sides.
10 The
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
EN09JA23.000
Date
apply. Further, the data does not allow
the Exchange to identify the Member
executing the trade at an away market.
1310
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Notices
The Exchange compared the options
volume in 2022 to the options volume
1an2022:
Feb2022
Marl0.22
Apr2022
May2022
Jun2022
Jul2022
Aug2022
Sep2022
Oct2022
Nov 2022.
Total Contracts customer Sides Trading.Days .QuarterConmK:ts· Quartercust Sides. Quarter ADC ·quartercustADS
891;440;49&
·802,161,195
939,163,167
77&,379;294
!ffil,243,942
801,773,016
738,813,504
908,077,814
910,263,106
905,661,870
918,505,766
797,406,0ll
20
71B, 778,70&
i9
840,433;394
702,072,317
767,283,732
709,165,236
655,311,174
813,006,778
794;395,507
798,687,922
809,588,117
23
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
BILLING CODE 8011–01–C
i,632,764)ffi0
2,347,618,114.
42,463,94!1
37,8'>4,808
2,441;:'196,252
2,178,521,285
3!1,377;359
$;137,440
2,557,154,424
.i,:262,713,459.
39,95S,;s38
35,354;898·
1,824,167,636
1,608,276,039
43.;432,Sfi3
~2,287
20
21
21
20
23
21
21
21
all of the Exchange’s other regulatory
fees and fines, would allow the
Exchange to continue covering a
material portion of its regulatory costs,
while lessening the potential for
generating excess revenue that may
otherwise occur using the rate of
$0.0014 per contract side.14
The Exchange will continue to
monitor the amount of revenue
collected from the ORF to ensure that it,
in combination with its other regulatory
fees and fines, does not exceed
regulatory costs. If the Exchange
determines regulatory revenues may
exceed or are projected to exceed
regulatory costs, the Exchange will
adjust the ORF by submitting a fee
change filing to the Commission and
notifying 15 its Members via an Options
Trader Alert.16
Comparing 2021 to 2022, the options
volumes in 2022 remained higher in a
majority of the months in 2022.12
November volume for 2022, while lower
than November volume for 2021,
remains higher than most months in
2021. With respect to customer options
volume across the industry, total
customer options contract average daily
volume, to date, in 2022 is 36,509,256
as compared to total customer options
contract average daily volume in 2021
which was 36,308,323.13
There can be no assurance that the
Exchange’s costs for 2023 will not differ
materially from these expectations and
prior practice, nor can the Exchange
predict with certainty whether options
volume will remain at the current level
going forward. The Exchange notes
however, that when combined with
regulatory fees and fines, the revenue
that may be generated utilizing an ORF
rate of $0.0014 per contract side may
result in revenue which exceeds the
Exchange’s estimated regulatory costs
for 2023 if options volumes remain the
same. The options volume for 2022
remains high when compared to 2021
volumes. GEMX lowered ORF in the
beginning of 2022 to account for the
options volume in 2021. The Exchange
therefore proposes to reduce its ORF to
$0.0013 per contract side to ensure that
revenue does not exceed the Exchange’s
estimated regulatory costs in 2023.
Particularly, the Exchange believes that
reducing the ORF when combined with
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.17 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act,18 which provides that
Exchange rules may provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
members, and other persons using its
facilities. Additionally, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) 19
requirement that the rules of an
exchange not be designed to permit
unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes the proposed
fee change is reasonable because
customer transactions will be subject to
a lower ORF fee than the rate that would
otherwise be in effect on February 1,
2023. Moreover, the proposed reduction
is necessary for the Exchange to avoid
collecting revenue, in combination with
other regulatory fees and fines, that
would be in excess of its anticipated
regulatory costs which is consistent
with the Exchange’s practices.
The Exchange designed the ORF to
generate revenues that would be less
than the amount of the Exchange’s
regulatory costs to ensure that it, in
combination with its other regulatory
fees and fines, does not exceed
regulatory costs, which is consistent
with the view of the Commission that
regulatory fees be used for regulatory
purposes and not to support the
Exchange’s business operations. As
discussed above, however, after review
of its regulatory costs and regulatory
revenues, which includes revenues from
ORF and other regulatory fees and fines,
the Exchange determined that absent a
reduction in ORF, it may collect
revenue which would exceed its
regulatory costs. Indeed, the Exchange
notes that when taking into account the
potential that recent options volume
persists, it estimates the ORF may
11 The OCC data reflects data from January
through November 2022. Volume data in the table
represents numbers of contracts; each contract has
two sides.
12 February, June, July and November 2022
volumes are lower as compared to 2021 volumes in
those same months.
13 See data from OCC at: https://www.theocc.com/
Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-andOpen-Interest/Volume-by-Account-Type.
14 The Exchange notes that its regulatory
responsibilities with respect to Member compliance
with options sales practice rules have largely been
allocated to FINRA under a 17d–2 agreement. The
ORF is not designed to cover the cost of that options
sales practice regulation.
15 The Exchange will provide Members with such
notice at least 30 calendar days prior to the effective
date of the change.
16 The Exchange notes that in connection with
this proposal, it provided the Commission
confidential details regarding the Exchange’s
projected regulatory revenue, including projected
revenue from ORF, along with a projected
regulatory expenses.
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
19 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
EN09JA23.001
Date.
in 2021. The below table displays
monthly volume for 2022 to date.11
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
generate revenues that would cover
more than the approximated Exchange’s
projected regulatory costs. As such, the
Exchange believes it’s reasonable and
appropriate to reduce the ORF amount
from $0.0014 to $0.0013 per contract
side.
The Exchange also believes the
proposed fee change is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory in that it is
charged to all Members on all their
transactions that clear in the customer
range at OCC.20 The Exchange believes
the ORF ensures fairness by assessing
higher fees to those Members that
require more Exchange regulatory
services based on the amount of
customer options business they
conduct. Regulating customer trading
activity is much more labor intensive
and requires greater expenditure of
human and technical resources than
regulating non-customer trading
activity, which tends to be more
automated and less labor-intensive. For
example, there are costs associated with
main office and branch office
examinations (e.g., staff expenses), as
well as investigations into customer
complaints and the terminations of
registered persons. As a result, the costs
associated with administering the
customer component of the Exchange’s
overall regulatory program are
materially higher than the costs
associated with administering the noncustomer component (e.g., Member
proprietary transactions) of its
regulatory program. Moreover, the
Exchange notes that it has broad
regulatory responsibilities with respect
to activities of its Members, irrespective
of where their transactions take place.
Many of the Exchange’s surveillance
programs for customer trading activity
may require the Exchange to look at
activity across all markets, such as
reviews related to position limit
violations and manipulation. Indeed,
the Exchange cannot effectively review
for such conduct without looking at and
evaluating activity regardless of where it
transpires. In addition to its own
surveillance programs, the Exchange
also works with other SROs and
exchanges on intermarket surveillance
related issues. Through its participation
in the Intermarket Surveillance Group
(‘‘ISG’’) 21 the Exchange shares
20 If the OCC clearing member is a GEMX
member, ORF is assessed and collected on all
cleared customer contracts (after adjustment for
CMTA); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is not
a GEMX member, ORF is collected only on the
cleared customer contracts executed at GEMX,
taking into account any CMTA instructions which
may result in collecting the ORF from a nonmember.
21 ISG is an industry organization formed in 1983
to coordinate intermarket surveillance among the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
information and coordinates inquiries
and investigations with other exchanges
designed to address potential
intermarket manipulation and trading
abuses. Accordingly, there is a strong
nexus between the ORF and the
Exchange’s regulatory activities with
respect to customer trading activity of
its Members.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. This
proposal does not create an unnecessary
or inappropriate intra-market burden on
competition because the ORF applies to
all customer activity, thereby raising
regulatory revenue to offset regulatory
expenses. It also supplements the
regulatory revenue derived from noncustomer activity. The Exchange notes,
however, the proposed change is not
designed to address any competitive
issues. Indeed, this proposal does not
create an unnecessary or inappropriate
inter-market burden on competition
because it is a regulatory fee that
supports regulation in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange is
obligated to ensure that the amount of
regulatory revenue collected from the
ORF, in combination with its other
regulatory fees and fines, does not
exceed regulatory costs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 22 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 23 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
SROs by cooperatively sharing regulatory
information pursuant to a written agreement
between the parties. The goal of the ISG’s
information sharing is to coordinate regulatory
efforts to address potential intermarket trading
abuses and manipulations.
22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
23 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1311
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–
GEMX–2022–14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–GEMX–2022–14. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–GEMX–2022–14, and should be
submitted on or before January 30, 2023.
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
1312
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
Dated: January 5, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
Dated: January 5, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–00277 Filed 1–5–23; 4:15 pm]
[FR Doc. 2023–00279 Filed 1–5–23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Sunshine Act Meetings
[Disaster Declaration #17749 and #17750;
California Disaster Number CA–00365]
TIME AND DATE:
2:00 p.m. on Thursday,
January 12, 2023.
Administrative Declaration of a
Disaster for the State of California
The meeting will be held via
remote means and/or at the
Commission’s headquarters, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2023–00118 Filed 1–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
2:30 p.m. on Monday,
January 9, 2023.
PLACE: The meeting will be held via
remote means and/or at the
Commission’s headquarters, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
STATUS: This meeting will be closed to
the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the closed meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
In the event that the time, date, or
location of this meeting changes, an
announcement of the change, along with
the new time, date, and/or place of the
meeting will be posted on the
Commission’s website at https://
www.sec.gov.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B)
and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3),
(a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and
(a)(10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
The subject matter of the closed
meeting will consist of the following
topics:
TIME AND DATE:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Institution and settlement of injunctive
actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative
proceedings;
Resolution of litigation claims; and
Other matters relating to examinations and
enforcement proceedings.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting agenda items that
may consist of adjudicatory,
examination, litigation, or regulatory
matters.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For further information; please contact
Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office
of the Secretary at (202) 551–5400.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.
24 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
PLACE:
This meeting will be closed to
the public.
STATUS:
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the closed meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
In the event that the time, date, or
location of this meeting changes, an
announcement of the change, along with
the new time, date, and/or place of the
meeting will be posted on the
Commission’s website at https://
www.sec.gov.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B)
and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3),
(a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and
(a)(10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
The subject matter of the closed
meeting will consist of the following
topics:
Institution and settlement of
injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings;
Resolution of litigation claims; and
Other matters relating to examinations
and enforcement proceedings.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting agenda items that
may consist of adjudicatory,
examination, litigation, or regulatory
matters.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For further information; please contact
Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office
of the Secretary at (202) 551–5400.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
This is a notice of an
Administrative declaration of a disaster
for the State of California dated 01/04/
2023.
Incident: Earthquake.
Incident Period: 12/20/2022 and
continuing.
SUMMARY:
Issued on 01/04/2023.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 03/06/2023.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 10/04/2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
Administrator’s disaster declaration,
applications for disaster loans may be
filed at the address listed above or other
locally announced locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties: Humboldt.
Contiguous Counties:
California: Del Norte, Mendocino,
Siskiyou, Trinity.
The Interest Rates are:
DATES:
Percent
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere ....................
Homeowners without Credit
Available Elsewhere ............
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere ....................
Businesses without Credit
Available Elsewhere ............
Non-Profit Organizations with
Credit Available Elsewhere
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
4.625
2.313
6.610
3.305
2.375
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1308-1312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00118]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-96598; File No. SR-GEMX-2022-14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Reduce GEMX's
Options Regulatory Fee
January 3, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 22, 2022, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend GEMX's Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 5 to reduce the GEMX Options Regulatory Fee or ``ORF''.
While the changes proposed herein are effective upon filing, the
Exchange has designated the amendments become operative on February 1,
2023.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/gemx/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
GEMX proposes to lower its ORF from $0.0014 to $0.0013 per contract
side on February 1, 2023. Previously, GEMX has filed to lower or waive
its ORF in 2019, 2021 and 2022.\3\ After a review of its regulatory
revenues and regulatory costs, the Exchange proposes to reduce the ORF
to ensure that revenue collected from the ORF, in combination with
other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total
regulatory costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85140 (February 14,
2019), 84 FR 5511 (February 21, 2019) (SR-GEMX-2019-01) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Options Regulatory Fee); 92698 (August 18, 2021), 86 FR
47355 (August 24, 2021) (SR-GEMX-2021-08) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend GEMX's
Options Regulatory Fee); and 94069 (January 26, 2022), 87 FR 5545
(February 1, 2022) (SR-GEMX-2022-03) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Reduce GEMX's Options
Regulatory Fee).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volumes in the options industry went over 900,000,000 total
contracts as of August 2022 and remained over that threshold through
November 2022. GEMX has taken measures in prior years to lower and
waive its ORF to ensure that revenue collected from the ORF, in
combination with other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the
Exchange's total regulatory costs. Despite those prior measures, GEMX
will need to reduce its ORF again to account for trading volumes in
2022. At this time, GEMX believes that the options volume it
experienced in the second half of 2022 is likely to persist in 2023.
The anticipated options volume would continue to impact GEMX's ORF
collection which, in turn, has caused GEMX to propose reducing the ORF
to ensure that revenue collected from the ORF, in combination with
other regulatory fees and fines, would not exceed the Exchange's total
regulatory costs.
Collection of ORF
GEMX will continue to assess its ORF for each customer option
transaction that is either: (1) executed by a Member on GEMX; or (2)
cleared by an GEMX Member at The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
in the customer range,\4\ even if the transaction was executed by a
non-Member of GEMX, regardless of the exchange on which the transaction
occurs.\5\ If the OCC clearing member is a GEMX Member, ORF is assessed
and collected on all cleared customer contracts (after adjustment for
CMTA \6\); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is not a GEMX Member, ORF
is collected only on the cleared customer contracts executed at GEMX,
taking into
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Participants must record the appropriate account origin code
on all orders at the time of entry of the order. The Exchange
represents that it has surveillances in place to verify that members
mark orders with the correct account origin code.
\5\ The Exchange uses reports from OCC when assessing and
collecting the ORF.
\6\ CMTA or Clearing Member Trade Assignment is a form of
``give-up'' whereby the position will be assigned to a specific
clearing firm at OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 1309]]
account any CMTA instructions which may result in collecting the ORF
from a non-Member.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ By way of example, if Broker A, a GEMX Member, routes a
customer order to CBOE and the transaction executes on CBOE and
clears in Broker A's OCC Clearing account, ORF will be collected by
GEMX from Broker A's clearing account at OCC via direct debit. While
this transaction was executed on a market other than GEMX, it was
cleared by a GEMX Member in the member's OCC clearing account in the
customer range, therefore there is a regulatory nexus between GEMX
and the transaction. If Broker A was not a GEMX Member, then no ORF
should be assessed and collected because there is no nexus; the
transaction did not execute on GEMX nor was it cleared by a GEMX
Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case where a Member both executes a transaction and clears
the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and collected from that
Member. In the case where a Member executes a transaction and a
different Member clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to
and collected from the Member who clears the transaction and not the
Member who executes the transaction. In the case where a non-Member
executes a transaction at an away market and a Member clears the
transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and collected from the Member
who clears the transaction. In the case where a Member executes a
transaction on GEMX and a non-Member clears the transaction, the ORF
will be assessed to the Member that executed the transaction on GEMX
and collected from the non-Member who cleared the transaction. In the
case where a Member executes a transaction at an away market and a non-
Member clears the transaction, the ORF will not be assessed to the
Member who executed the transaction or collected from the non-Member
who cleared the transaction because the Exchange does not have access
to the data to make absolutely certain that ORF should apply. Further,
the data does not allow the Exchange to identify the Member executing
the trade at an away market.
ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF
The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the ORF
to ensure that it, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines,
does not exceed regulatory costs. In determining whether an expense is
considered a regulatory cost, the Exchange reviews all costs and makes
determinations if there is a nexus between the expense and a regulatory
function. The Exchange notes that fines collected by the Exchange in
connection with a disciplinary matter offset ORF.
Revenue generated from ORF, when combined with all of the
Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines, is designed to recover a
material portion of the regulatory costs to the Exchange of the
supervision and regulation of member customer options business
including performing routine surveillances, investigations,
examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking,
interpretive, and enforcement activities. Regulatory costs include
direct regulatory expenses and certain indirect expenses in support of
the regulatory function. The direct expenses include in-house and
third-party service provider costs to support the day-to-day regulatory
work such as surveillances, investigations and examinations. The
indirect expenses include support from such areas as Office of the
General Counsel, technology, and internal audit. Indirect expenses were
approximately 39% of the total regulatory costs for 2022. Thus, direct
expenses were approximately 61% of total regulatory costs for 2022.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Exchange will finalize its 2023 Regulatory Budget in the
first quarter of 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to
the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of its Members,
including performing routine surveillances, investigations,
examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking,
interpretive, and enforcement activities.
Proposal
Based on the Exchange's most recent review, the Exchange is
proposing to reduce the amount of ORF that will be collected by the
Exchange from $0.0014 per contract side to $0.0013 per contract side.
The Exchange issued an Options Trader Alert on December 20, 2022
indicating the proposed rate change for February 1, 2023.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Options Trader Alert 2022-44.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed reduction is based on current levels of options
volume. The below table displays monthly volume from 2021.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The OCC data from December 2021 numbers reflect only 13
trading days as this information is through December 17, 2021.
Volume data in the table represents numbers of contracts; each
contract has two sides.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA23.000
[[Page 1310]]
The Exchange compared the options volume in 2022 to the options
volume in 2021. The below table displays monthly volume for 2022 to
date.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The OCC data reflects data from January through November
2022. Volume data in the table represents numbers of contracts; each
contract has two sides.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA23.001
BILLING CODE 8011-01-C
Comparing 2021 to 2022, the options volumes in 2022 remained higher
in a majority of the months in 2022.\12\ November volume for 2022,
while lower than November volume for 2021, remains higher than most
months in 2021. With respect to customer options volume across the
industry, total customer options contract average daily volume, to
date, in 2022 is 36,509,256 as compared to total customer options
contract average daily volume in 2021 which was 36,308,323.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ February, June, July and November 2022 volumes are lower as
compared to 2021 volumes in those same months.
\13\ See data from OCC at: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Volume-by-Account-Type.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There can be no assurance that the Exchange's costs for 2023 will
not differ materially from these expectations and prior practice, nor
can the Exchange predict with certainty whether options volume will
remain at the current level going forward. The Exchange notes however,
that when combined with regulatory fees and fines, the revenue that may
be generated utilizing an ORF rate of $0.0014 per contract side may
result in revenue which exceeds the Exchange's estimated regulatory
costs for 2023 if options volumes remain the same. The options volume
for 2022 remains high when compared to 2021 volumes. GEMX lowered ORF
in the beginning of 2022 to account for the options volume in 2021. The
Exchange therefore proposes to reduce its ORF to $0.0013 per contract
side to ensure that revenue does not exceed the Exchange's estimated
regulatory costs in 2023. Particularly, the Exchange believes that
reducing the ORF when combined with all of the Exchange's other
regulatory fees and fines, would allow the Exchange to continue
covering a material portion of its regulatory costs, while lessening
the potential for generating excess revenue that may otherwise occur
using the rate of $0.0014 per contract side.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The Exchange notes that its regulatory responsibilities
with respect to Member compliance with options sales practice rules
have largely been allocated to FINRA under a 17d-2 agreement. The
ORF is not designed to cover the cost of that options sales practice
regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue
collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. If the
Exchange determines regulatory revenues may exceed or are projected to
exceed regulatory costs, the Exchange will adjust the ORF by submitting
a fee change filing to the Commission and notifying \15\ its Members
via an Options Trader Alert.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The Exchange will provide Members with such notice at least
30 calendar days prior to the effective date of the change.
\16\ The Exchange notes that in connection with this proposal,
it provided the Commission confidential details regarding the
Exchange's projected regulatory revenue, including projected revenue
from ORF, along with a projected regulatory expenses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\17\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\18\ which provides that Exchange rules may provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its members, and other persons using its facilities.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \19\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed fee change is reasonable because
customer transactions will be subject to a lower ORF fee than the rate
that would otherwise be in effect on February 1, 2023. Moreover, the
proposed reduction is necessary for the Exchange to avoid collecting
revenue, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, that
would be in excess of its anticipated regulatory costs which is
consistent with the Exchange's practices.
The Exchange designed the ORF to generate revenues that would be
less than the amount of the Exchange's regulatory costs to ensure that
it, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not
exceed regulatory costs, which is consistent with the view of the
Commission that regulatory fees be used for regulatory purposes and not
to support the Exchange's business operations. As discussed above,
however, after review of its regulatory costs and regulatory revenues,
which includes revenues from ORF and other regulatory fees and fines,
the Exchange determined that absent a reduction in ORF, it may collect
revenue which would exceed its regulatory costs. Indeed, the Exchange
notes that when taking into account the potential that recent options
volume persists, it estimates the ORF may
[[Page 1311]]
generate revenues that would cover more than the approximated
Exchange's projected regulatory costs. As such, the Exchange believes
it's reasonable and appropriate to reduce the ORF amount from $0.0014
to $0.0013 per contract side.
The Exchange also believes the proposed fee change is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory in that it is charged to all Members on all
their transactions that clear in the customer range at OCC.\20\ The
Exchange believes the ORF ensures fairness by assessing higher fees to
those Members that require more Exchange regulatory services based on
the amount of customer options business they conduct. Regulating
customer trading activity is much more labor intensive and requires
greater expenditure of human and technical resources than regulating
non-customer trading activity, which tends to be more automated and
less labor-intensive. For example, there are costs associated with main
office and branch office examinations (e.g., staff expenses), as well
as investigations into customer complaints and the terminations of
registered persons. As a result, the costs associated with
administering the customer component of the Exchange's overall
regulatory program are materially higher than the costs associated with
administering the non-customer component (e.g., Member proprietary
transactions) of its regulatory program. Moreover, the Exchange notes
that it has broad regulatory responsibilities with respect to
activities of its Members, irrespective of where their transactions
take place. Many of the Exchange's surveillance programs for customer
trading activity may require the Exchange to look at activity across
all markets, such as reviews related to position limit violations and
manipulation. Indeed, the Exchange cannot effectively review for such
conduct without looking at and evaluating activity regardless of where
it transpires. In addition to its own surveillance programs, the
Exchange also works with other SROs and exchanges on intermarket
surveillance related issues. Through its participation in the
Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'') \21\ the Exchange shares
information and coordinates inquiries and investigations with other
exchanges designed to address potential intermarket manipulation and
trading abuses. Accordingly, there is a strong nexus between the ORF
and the Exchange's regulatory activities with respect to customer
trading activity of its Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ If the OCC clearing member is a GEMX member, ORF is
assessed and collected on all cleared customer contracts (after
adjustment for CMTA); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is not a
GEMX member, ORF is collected only on the cleared customer contracts
executed at GEMX, taking into account any CMTA instructions which
may result in collecting the ORF from a non-member.
\21\ ISG is an industry organization formed in 1983 to
coordinate intermarket surveillance among the SROs by cooperatively
sharing regulatory information pursuant to a written agreement
between the parties. The goal of the ISG's information sharing is to
coordinate regulatory efforts to address potential intermarket
trading abuses and manipulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. This proposal does not create
an unnecessary or inappropriate intra-market burden on competition
because the ORF applies to all customer activity, thereby raising
regulatory revenue to offset regulatory expenses. It also supplements
the regulatory revenue derived from non-customer activity. The Exchange
notes, however, the proposed change is not designed to address any
competitive issues. Indeed, this proposal does not create an
unnecessary or inappropriate inter-market burden on competition because
it is a regulatory fee that supports regulation in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange is obligated to ensure that the
amount of regulatory revenue collected from the ORF, in combination
with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory
costs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \22\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \23\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File No. SR-GEMX-2022-14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-GEMX-2022-14. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR-GEMX-2022-14, and should be submitted on or
before January 30, 2023.
[[Page 1312]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-00118 Filed 1-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P