Glycine From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative; 2020-2021, 78931-78933 [2022-28007]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 246 / Friday, December 23, 2022 / Notices 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of imports of steel nails from Thailand no later than 45 days after our final determination. If the ITC determines that such injury does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated, and all cash deposits posted will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed in the ‘‘Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation’’ section. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as a final reminder to the parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c). Dated: December 19, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is certain steel nails having a nominal shaft or shank length not exceeding 12 inches. Certain steel nails include, but are not limited to, nails made from round wire and nails that are cut from flat-rolled steel or long-rolled flat steel bars. Certain steel nails may be of one piece construction or constructed of two or more pieces. Examples of nails constructed of two or more pieces include, but are not limited to, anchors comprised of an anchor body made of zinc or nylon and a steel pin or a steel nail; crimp drive anchors; split-drive anchors, and strike pin anchors. Also included in the scope are anchors of one piece construction. Certain steel nails may be produced from any type of steel, and may have any type of surface finish, head type, shank, point type and shaft diameter. Finishes include, but are VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:36 Dec 22, 2022 Jkt 259001 not limited to, coating in vinyl, zinc (galvanized, including but not limited to electroplating or hot dipping one or more times), phosphate, cement, and paint. Certain steel nails may have one or more surface finishes. Head styles include, but are not limited to, flat, projection, cupped, oval, brad, headless, double, countersunk, and sinker. Shank or shaft styles include, but are not limited to, smooth, barbed, screw threaded, ring shank and fluted. Screw-threaded nails subject to this proceeding are driven using direct force and not by turning the nail using a tool that engages with the head. Point styles include, but are not limited to, diamond, needle, chisel and blunt or no point. Certain steel nails may be sold in bulk, or they may be collated in any manner using any material. Excluded from the scope are certain steel nails packaged in combination with one or more non-subject articles, if the total number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless of size, is less than 25. If packaged in combination with one or more non-subject articles, certain steel nails remain subject merchandise if the total number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless of size, is equal to or greater than 25, unless otherwise excluded based on the other exclusions below. Also excluded from the scope are certain steel nails with a nominal shaft or shank length of one inch or less that are a component of an unassembled article, where the total number of nails is sixty (60) or less, and the imported unassembled article falls into one of the following eight groupings: (1) Builders’ joinery and carpentry of wood that are classifiable as windows, French-windows and their frames; (2) builders’ joinery and carpentry of wood that are classifiable as doors and their frames and thresholds; (3) swivel seats with variable height adjustment; (4) seats that are convertible into beds (with the exception of those classifiable as garden seats or camping equipment); (5) seats of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials; (6) other seats with wooden frames (with the exception of seats of a kind used for aircraft or motor vehicles); (7) furniture (other than seats) of wood (with the exception of (i) medical, surgical, dental or veterinary furniture; and (ii) barbers’ chairs and similar chairs, having rotating as well as both reclining and elevating movements); or (8) furniture (other than seats) of materials other than wood, metal, or plastics (e.g., furniture of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials). The aforementioned imported unassembled articles are currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 4418.10, 4418.20, 9401.30, 9401.40, 9401.51, 9401.59, 9401.61, 9401.69, 9403.30, 9403.40, 9403.50, 9403.60, 9403.81 or 9403.89. Also excluded from the scope of this investigation are nails suitable for use in powder-actuated hand tools, whether or not threaded, which are currently classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.2000 and 7317.00.3000. Also excluded from the scope of this investigation are nails suitable for use in gasactuated hand tools. These nails have a case hardness greater than or equal to 50 on the PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 78931 Rockwell Hardness C scale (HRC), a carbon content greater than or equal to 0.5 percent, a round head, a secondary reduced-diameter raised head section, a centered shank, and a smooth symmetrical point. Also excluded from the scope of this investigation are corrugated nails. A corrugated nail is made up of a small strip of corrugated steel with sharp points on one side. Also excluded from the scope of this investigation are thumb tacks, which are currently classified under HTSUS subheading 7317.00.1000. Also excluded from the scope are decorative or upholstery tacks. Certain steel nails subject to this investigation are currently classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.5501, 7317.00.5502, 7317.00.5503, 7317.00.5505, 7317.00.5507, 7317.00.5508, 7317.00.5511, 7317.00.5518, 7317.00.5519, 7317.00.5520, 7317.00.5530, 7317.00.5540, 7317.00.5550, 7317.00.5560, 7317.00.5570, 7317.00.5580, 7317.00.5590, 7317.00.6530, 7317.00.6560, and 7317.00.7500. Certain steel nails subject to this investigation also may be classified under HTSUS subheadings 7318.15.5090, 7907.00.6000, 8206.00.0000, or other HTSUS subheadings. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination IV. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Come Best’s Product Characteristics Comment 2: Come Best’s Corrected Surface Finish Codes V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–28017 Filed 12–22–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–588–878] Glycine From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative; 2020–2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd. (YGK) and Nagase & Co., Ltd. (Nagase) (collectively, YGK/Nagase) made sales of glycine from Japan at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) June 1, 2020, through May 31, 2021. DATES: Applicable December 23, 2022. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM 23DEN1 78932 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 246 / Friday, December 23, 2022 / Notices TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to that importer (or customer). Where an importer (or customer)specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and the respondent has Estimated reported reliable entered values, we will weighted- apply the assessment rate to the entered average Background value of the importer’s/customer’s Producer/exporter dumping entries during the POR. On July 8, 2022, Commerce published margin Commerce intends to issue (percent) the Preliminary Results.1 A summary of appropriate assessment instructions the events that occurred since directly to CBP no earlier than 35 days Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd./ Commerce published these Preliminary Nagase & Co., Ltd 4 ................ 24.92 after the date of publication of the final Results, as well as a full discussion of results of this review in the Federal the issues raised by parties for these Register. If a timely summons is filed at Disclosure final results, may be found in the Issues the U.S. Court of International Trade, We will disclose the calculations and Decision Memorandum.2 the assessment instructions will direct performed to parties in this proceeding The Issues and Decision CBP not to liquidate relevant entries within five days after the date of the Memorandum is a public document and until the time for parties to file a request public announcement of these final is on file electronically via Enforcement for a statutory injunction has expired results of review, in accordance with 19 and Compliance’s Antidumping and (i.e., within 90 days of publication). CFR 351.224(b). Countervailing Duty Centralized Cash Deposit Requirements Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Assessment Rate ACCESS is available to registered users The following cash deposit Commerce shall determine, and at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a requirements will be effective upon Customs and Border Protection (CBP) complete version of the Issues and publication of this notice for all shall assess, antidumping duties on all Decision Memorandum can be accessed shipments of subject merchandise 5 appropriate entries. For any at https://access.trade.gov/public/ entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, individually examined respondents FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. for consumption on or after the whose weighted-average dumping publication of these final results, as margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 Scope of the Order provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: percent), we calculated importerThe merchandise covered by this (1) the cash deposit rate for respondents specific ad valorem duty assessment order is glycine. Glycine and glycine noted above will be equal to the rates based on the ratio of the total slurry are classified under Harmonized weighted-average dumping margins amount of dumping calculated for the Tariff Schedule of the United States established in the final results of this importer’s examined sales to the total (HTSUS) subheading 2922.49.43.00. administrative review; (2) for entered value of those same sales, in Sodium glycinate is classified in the merchandise exported by producers or accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). HTSUS under 2922.49.80.00. For a Upon issuance of the final results of this exporters not covered in this complete description of the scope of the administrative review, if any importeradministrative review but covered in a order, see the Issues and Decision prior segment of the proceeding, the specific assessment rates calculated in Memorandum. cash deposit rate will continue to be the the final results are above de minimis, company-specific rate published for the Commerce will issue instructions Analysis of Comments Received most recently completed segment of this directly to CBP to assess antidumping proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a All issues raised in the case and duties on appropriate entries. firm covered in this review, a prior rebuttal briefs by parties to this To determine whether the duty review, or the original investigation, but administrative review are addressed in assessment rates covering the period the producer is, the cash deposit rate the Issues and Decision Memorandum. were de minimis, in accordance with will be the rate established for the most For a list of the issues raised by parties, the requirement set forth in 19 CFR recently completed segment of this see the appendix to this notice. 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer proceeding for the producer of the (or customer)-specific ad valorem rates Changes Since the Preliminary Results subject merchandise; and (4) the cash by aggregating the amount of dumping deposit rate for all other producers or Based on our review of the record and exporters will continue to be 53.66 comments received from interested 4 Based on the record information, Commerce percent, the all-others rate established parties, we made certain changes to the preliminarily determined that Nagase and YGK are affiliated within the meaning of section 771(33)(E) in the less-than-fair-value margin calculations for YGK/Nagase.3 of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and investigation.6 These cash deposit should be treated as a single entity pursuant to 19 requirements, when imposed, shall 1 See Glycine from Japan: Preliminary Results of CFR 351.401(f). See Preliminary Results. No party remain in effect until further notice. Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2020– commented on our preliminary determination with FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Final Results of the Administrative Review We determine that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period June 1, 2020, through May 31, 2021: 2021, 87 FR 40788 (July 8, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Glycine from Japan; 2020–2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 3b and 4. respect to this issue, and we have received no new information regarding this issue. Therefore, we determine that Nagase and YGK are affiliated within the meaning of section 771(33)(E) of the Act. 5 In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:36 Dec 22, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 6 See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170 (June 21, 2019). E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM 23DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 246 / Friday, December 23, 2022 / Notices responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties did occur and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Scope Comments International Trade Administration On July 5, 2022, we issued the Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum.3 The scope case briefs were due on July 19, 2022.4 We did not receive any scope case briefs from interested parties. Therefore, Commerce has not made any changes to the scope of this investigation since the Preliminary Determination. [A–542–804] Certain Steel Nails From Sri Lanka: Final Negative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties Background We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). On August 4, 2022, Commerce published in the Federal Register its preliminary negative determination in the LTFV investigation of steel nails from Sri Lanka, in which it also postponed the final determination until December 19, 2022.1 Commerce invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Determination. For a complete description of the events that followed the Preliminary Determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Dated: December 15, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Costs of Production Comment 2: Adjustment of U.S. Indirect Selling Expense Ratio Comment 3: Adjustment of General and Administrative Expenses Comment 4: U.S. Repacking Expense V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–28007 Filed 12–22–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain steel nails (steel nails) from Sri Lanka are not being, nor are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. DATES: Applicable December 23, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison Hollander, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2805. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Administrative Protective Order VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:36 Dec 22, 2022 Jkt 259001 78933 AGENCY: 1 See Certain Steel Nails from Sri Lanka: Preliminary Negative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 87 FR 47701 (August 4, 2022) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final Negative Determination of Sales at LessThan-Fair-Value in the Investigation of Certain Steel Nails from Sri Lanka,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is steel nails from Sri Lanka. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I. Verification Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information relied upon in making its final determination in this investigation pursuant to section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Accordingly, we took additional steps in lieu of an on-site verification and requested additional documentation and information.5 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix II. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made a change to the margin calculation for Trinity Steel Private Limited since the Preliminary Determination. For a discussion of the change, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Determination Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margin exists for the POI: 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Investigations of Certain Steel Nails from India, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Turkey and Countervailing Duty Investigations of Certain Steel Nails from India, Oman, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Turkey: Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum,’’ dated July 5, 2022 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum). 4 Id at 4. 5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Questionnaire in Lieu of Verification,’’ dated October 3, 2022. E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM 23DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 246 (Friday, December 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78931-78933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-588-878]


Glycine From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative; 2020-2021

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd. (YGK) and Nagase & Co., Ltd. (Nagase) 
(collectively, YGK/Nagase) made sales of glycine from Japan at less 
than normal value during the period of review (POR) June 1, 2020, 
through May 31, 2021.

DATES: Applicable December 23, 2022.

[[Page 78932]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 8, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.\1\ A 
summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published these 
Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised 
by parties for these final results, may be found in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Glycine from Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review, 2020-2021, 87 FR 40788 (July 8, 2022) 
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Glycine from Japan; 2020-2021,'' dated concurrently with, 
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is glycine. Glycine and 
glycine slurry are classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (HTSUS) subheading 2922.49.43.00. Sodium glycinate is 
classified in the HTSUS under 2922.49.80.00. For a complete description 
of the scope of the order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. For a list of the issues raised by parties, see the 
appendix to this notice.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties, we made certain changes to the margin calculations 
for YGK/Nagase.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 3b and 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    We determine that the following estimated weighted-average dumping 
margins exist for the period June 1, 2020, through May 31, 2021:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Based on the record information, Commerce preliminarily 
determined that Nagase and YGK are affiliated within the meaning of 
section 771(33)(E) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 
should be treated as a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f). 
See Preliminary Results. No party commented on our preliminary 
determination with respect to this issue, and we have received no 
new information regarding this issue. Therefore, we determine that 
Nagase and YGK are affiliated within the meaning of section 
771(33)(E) of the Act.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Estimated
                                                               weighted-
                                                                average
                      Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd./Nagase & Co., Ltd \4\............       24.92
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after the date of the public announcement 
of these final results of review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rate

    Commerce shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\5\ For any 
individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin 
is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent), we calculated importer-
specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the 
total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to 
the total entered value of those same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final results of this 
administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates 
calculated in the final results are above de minimis, Commerce will 
issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on 
appropriate entries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate 
calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in 
Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 
(February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period 
were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem 
rates by aggregating the amount of dumping calculated for all U.S. 
sales to that importer or customer and dividing this amount by the 
total entered value of the sales to that importer (or customer). Where 
an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is greater than de 
minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we 
will apply the assessment rate to the entered value of the importer's/
customer's entries during the POR.
    Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions 
directly to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication 
of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a 
timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the 
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory 
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
publication of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of 
the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be 
equal to the weighted-average dumping margins established in the final 
results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by 
producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but 
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is 
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original 
investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate established for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the 
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to 
be 53.66 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-
fair-value investigation.\6\ These cash deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative 
Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 
29170 (June 21, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their

[[Page 78933]]

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties did occur and the subsequent assessment of 
doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: December 15, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Costs of Production
    Comment 2: Adjustment of U.S. Indirect Selling Expense Ratio
    Comment 3: Adjustment of General and Administrative Expenses
    Comment 4: U.S. Repacking Expense
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2022-28007 Filed 12-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.