Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule, 78138-78141 [2022-27648]

Download as PDF 78138 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2022 / Notices Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the IEX’s principal office and on its internet website at www.iextrading.com. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–IEX–2022–13 and should be submitted on or before January 11, 2023. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.20 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2022–27653 Filed 12–20–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–96501; File No. SR– NYSEAMER–2022–55] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 December 15, 2022. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on December 9, 2022, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE 20 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:56 Dec 20, 2022 Jkt 259001 American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) regarding the Firm Monthly Fee Cap. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective December 9, 2022.4 The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of this filing to amend the Fee Schedule to modify the Firm Monthly Fee Cap. The Exchange proposes to implement the rule change on December 9, 2022. The Exchange proposes to modify the Firm Monthly Fee Cap, which is set forth in Section I.I. of the Fee Schedule.5 Currently, a Firm’s fees associated with Manual transactions are capped at $100,000 per month per Firm. A Firm currently may also qualify for a decreased fee cap by achieving tier 4 The Exchange previously filed to amend the Fee Schedule on December 1, 2022 (SR–NYSEAMER– 2022–54) and withdrew such filing on December 9, 2022. 5 See Fee Schedule, Section I.I., Firm Monthly Fee Cap, available at: https://www.nyse.com/ publicdocs/nyse/markets/american-options/NYSE_ American_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf. PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 levels in the American Customer Engagement Program (the ‘‘ACE Program’’).6 The Exchange proposes to raise the Firm Monthly Fee Cap to $150,000 per month per Firm and to eliminate the decreased fee caps for Firms that achieve ACE Program tiers, such that all Firms would be eligible for a $150,000 monthly fee cap. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to modify Section I.I. to replace references to a $100,000 cap with references to a $150,000 cap and to delete the sentence and table describing decreased fee caps offered to Firms that qualify for ACE Program tiers.7 The Exchange does not otherwise propose any changes to the provisions of the Firm Monthly Fee Cap. The incremental service fee of $0.01 per contract for Firm Manual transactions other than QCC Transactions will continue to apply once the Firm Monthly Fee Cap has been reached, and Royalty Fees and fees or volumes associated with Strategy Executions will continue to be excluded from the calculation of fees towards the Firm Monthly Fee Cap. Firm Facilitation Manual trades will also continue to be executed at the rate of $0.00 per contract regardless of whether a Firm has reached the Firm Monthly Fee Cap. The Exchange believes that the proposed change, despite increasing the amount of the Firm Monthly Fee Cap, would continue to incentivize Firms to direct order flow to the Exchange to achieve the benefits of cap on their Manual transaction fees. The Exchange also notes that the proposed change would provide for a uniform fee cap amount that would be applicable to all Firms and sets the Firm Monthly Fee Cap at an amount similar to the firm fee cap established by another options exchange.8 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,9 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,10 in particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and 6 See id., Section I.E., American Customer Engagement (‘‘ACE’’) Program. 7 The Exchange also proposes a conforming change to footnote 4 in Section I.A. (Rates for Options transactions) of the Fee Schedule, which cross-references the Firm Monthly Fee Cap as set forth in Section I.I. The Exchange likewise proposes to modify footnote 4 to replace the reference to a $100,000 cap with a reference to a $150,000 cap. 8 See, e.g., Nasdaq PHLX LLC, Options 7 Pricing Schedule, Section 4 (providing for a ‘‘Monthly Firm Fee Cap’’ capping firm fees at $150,000). 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM 21DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2022 / Notices other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ‘‘has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.’’ 11 There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.12 Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. More specifically, in October 2022, the Exchange had less than 8% market share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity and ETF options trades.13 The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated otherwise, changes to exchange transaction fees can have a direct effect on the ability of an exchange to compete for order flow. The proposed change to the Firm Monthly Fee Cap is reasonable because the Exchange believes the fee cap would 11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7–10–04) (‘‘Reg NMS Adopting Release’’). 12 The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, available here: https:// www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-DataReports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/MonthyWeekly-Volume-Statistics. 13 Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see id., the Exchange’s market share in equity-based options was 7.68% for the month of October 2021 and 7.25% for the month of October 2022. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:56 Dec 20, 2022 Jkt 259001 continue to incentivize Firms to direct order flow to the Exchange to receive the benefits of capped fees for their Manual transactions. The Exchange also believes the proposed change is reasonable because it would provide for a fee cap amount that would be applicable to all Firms (regardless of their qualification for ACE Program tiers) and establishes a cap amount similar to that offered by another options exchange.14 To the extent that the proposed change continues to attract volume to the Exchange, this order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for order execution, which, in turn, promotes just and equitable principles of trade and removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. The Exchange notes that all market participants stand to benefit from any increase in volume, which could promote market depth, facilitate tighter spreads and enhance price discovery, particularly to the extent the proposed change encourages market participants to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue, and may lead to a corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants. Finally, to the extent the proposed change continues to attract greater volume and liquidity, the Exchange believes the proposed change would improve the Exchange’s overall competitiveness and strengthen its market quality for all market participants. In the backdrop of the competitive environment in which the Exchange operates, the proposed rule change is a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase the depth of its market and improve its market share relative to its competitors. The Exchange’s fees are constrained by intermarket competition, as market participants can choose to direct their order flow to any of the 16 options exchanges, including an exchange offering a monthly firm fee cap of a similar amount.15 The Exchange believes that proposed rule change is designed to continue to incent market participants to direct liquidity to the Exchange, and, to the extent they continue to be incentivized to aggregate their trading activity at the Exchange, that increased liquidity could promote market depth, price discovery and improvement, and enhanced order execution opportunities for all market participants. 14 See 15 See PO 00000 note 8, supra. id. Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 78139 The Proposed Rule Change Is an Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable allocation of its fees and credits. The proposed change is equitable because the modified Firm Monthly Fee Cap would apply to all Firms equally and, by eliminating the decreased caps available to Firms that achieve ACE Program tiers, would provide for the same fee cap amount for all Firms on their Manual transactions. The Exchange believes that the proposed changes are designed to continue to incent Firms to aggregate their executions at the Exchange as a primary execution venue. To the extent that the proposed change achieves its purpose in attracting more volume to the Exchange, this increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for, among other things, order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change would improve market quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby improving market-wide quality and price discovery. The Proposed Rule Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory The Exchange believes that the modification of the Firm Monthly Fee Cap is not unfairly discriminatory because the fee cap, as proposed, would be available to all similarly situated Firms, any of which could continue to be incentivized to direct order flow to the Exchange to qualify for the fee cap. Moreover, the proposed change to the Firm Monthly Fee Cap is not unfairly discriminatory because it would apply the same fee cap amount to all Firms, regardless of whether they achieve ACE Program tiers. Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change would improve market quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby improving market-wide quality and price discovery. The resulting increased volume and liquidity would provide more trading opportunities and tighter spreads to all market participants and thus would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant competitive forces, as described below in the E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM 21DEN1 78140 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2022 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Exchange’s statement regarding the burden on competition. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities for all market participants. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed change furthers the Commission’s goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, which promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.’’ 16 Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to continue to attract order flow to the Exchange, which could increase the volumes of contracts traded on the Exchange. Greater liquidity benefits all market participants on the Exchange, and the Exchange believes that the proposed modification of the Firm Monthly Fee Cap (even though it would raise the amount of the fee cap) would continue to incentivize Firms to direct order flow to the Exchange to be eligible for the benefits of capped fees on Manual transactions, thereby promoting liquidity on the Exchange to the benefit of all market participants. Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one of the 16 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange. Based on publiclyavailable information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.17 Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. More specifically, in October 2022, the Exchange had less than 8% market share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity and ETF options trades.18 The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment because it modifies the Exchange’s fees in a manner designed to continue to incent market participants to direct trading interest to the Exchange, to provide liquidity and to attract order flow. To the extent that Firms are incentivized to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue for all transactions, all of the Exchange’s market participants should benefit from the improved market quality and increased opportunities for price improvement. The Exchange also notes that the proposed change increases the Firm Monthly Fee Cap to an amount similar to the fee cap offered by another options exchange. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other exchanges. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 19 of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 20 thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 21 of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule 18 See 16 See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 11, at 37499. 17 See note 12, supra. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:56 Dec 20, 2022 Jkt 259001 note 13, supra. U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 20 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 21 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 19 15 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NYSEAMER–2022–55 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEAMER–2022–55. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEAMER–2022–55, and should be submitted on or before January 11, 2023. E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM 21DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2022 / Notices For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.22 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2022–27648 Filed 12–20–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–96514; File No. SR–NYSE– 2022–14] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 2, To Modify Certain Pricing Limitations for Securities Listed on the Exchange Pursuant to a Primary Direct Floor Listing December 15, 2022. I. Introduction On April 7, 2022, New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to modify certain pricing limitations for securities listed on the Exchange pursuant to a direct listing in which the company will sell shares itself in the opening auction on the first day of trading on the Exchange. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on April 19, 2022.3 On May 26, 2022, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,4 the Commission designated a longer period within which to either approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.5 On July 18, 2022, the Commission instituted proceedings under Section 22 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94708 (Apr. 13, 2022), 87 FR 23300 (Apr. 19, 2022). Comments received on the proposal are available on the Commission’s website at: https://www.sec.gov/ comments/sr-nyse-2022-14/srnyse202214.htm. The comments expressed by one commenter are not relevant to the proposed rule change. See Letter from Andrew Robison (Apr. 22, 2022). 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94991 (May 26, 2022), 87 FR 33518 (June 2, 2022). The Commission designated July 18, 2022, as the date by which it should approve, disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:56 Dec 20, 2022 Jkt 259001 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act 6 to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.7 On October 11, 2022, the Commission extended the time period for approving or disapproving the proposal to December 15, 2022.8 On November 8, 2022, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change, which superseded the original filing in its entirety.9 The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2, was published for comment in the Federal Register on November 15, 2022.10 The Commission is approving the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2. II. Description of the Proposal, as Modified by Amendment No. 2 Section 102.01B, Footnote (E) of the of the Listed Company Manual (the ‘‘Manual’’) provides that, in certain cases, a company that has not previously had its common equity securities registered under the Exchange Act may wish to list its common equity securities on the Exchange at the time of effectiveness of a registration statement 11 pursuant to which the company will sell shares itself in the opening auction on the first day of trading on the Exchange (a ‘‘Primary Direct Floor Listing’’).12 In the 6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95312 (July 18, 2022), 87 FR 43914 (July 22, 2022) (‘‘OIP’’). 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96023 (Oct. 11, 2022), 87 FR 62902 (Oct. 17, 2022. 9 On November 4, 2022, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. Amendment No. 1 was withdrawn on November 8, 2022. Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change revised the proposal: (i) to require the retention of an underwriter with respect to the primary sales of shares by the company and identification of the underwriter in the company’s effective registration statement; (ii) to clarify that the 20% and 80% thresholds used in determining the Primary Direct Floor Listing Auction Price Range will be calculated based on the highest price of the Issuer Price Range; (iii) to require that the Auction Price cannot be above the price that is 80% above the highest price of the Issuer Price Range; (iv) to require that if the issuer certifies to the Exchange a maximum Auction Price that is below the price that is 80% above the highest price of the Issuer Price Range, the Auction Price may not be above such price; and (v) to make other clarifying changes. 10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. (Nov. 8, 2022), 87 FR 68558 (Nov. 15, 2022) (‘‘Notice’’). 11 The reference to a registration statement refers to a registration statement effective under the Securities Act of 1933 (‘‘Securities Act’’). 12 A Primary Direct Floor Listing includes listings where either: (i) only the company itself is selling shares in the opening auction on the first day of trading; or (ii) the company is selling shares and selling shareholders may also sell shares in such opening auction. See Section 102.01B, Footnote (E) of the Manual. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90768 (Dec. 22, 2020), 85 FR 85807 (Dec. 29, 2020) (SR–NYSE–2019–67) (Order Setting Aside Action by Delegated Authority and 7 See PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 78141 Exchange’s prior approved proposal to initially allow for a Primary Direct Floor Listing, the Exchange also adopted Rule 7.31(c)(1)(D) defining an Issuer Direct Offering Order (‘‘IDO Order’’) 13 for use by a company that wishes to sell its shares through a Primary Direct Floor Listing. In addition, the Exchange modified Rule 7.35A to describe how the IDO Order would participate in a Direct Listing Auction, establish additional requirements for a Designated Market Maker (‘‘DMM’’) when conducting a Direct Listing Auction for a Primary Direct Floor Listing, and specify how the Indication Reference Price would be determined for a security to be opened in a Direct Listing.14 Currently, under Rule 7.35A(g)(2), the DMM will not conduct a Direct Listing Auction for a Primary Direct Floor Listing if (i) the Auction Price 15 would be outside of the price range specified by the company in its effective registration statement (the ‘‘Price Range Limitation’’) 16 or (ii) there Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 2, to Amend Chapter One of the Listed Company Manual to Modify the Provisions Relating to Direct Listings) (‘‘Approval Order’’). 13 See Approval Order, supra note 12, 85 FR 85813. An IDO Order is a Limit Order to sell that is to be traded only in a Direct Listing Auction. See Rule 7.31(c)(1)(D). See also Rule 7.31(a)(2) for the definition of ‘‘Limit Order,’’ Rule 7.35(a)(1) for the definition of ‘‘Auction,’’ and Rule 7.35(a)(1)(E) for the definition of ‘‘Direct Listing Auction.’’ The IDO Order has the following requirements: (i) only one IDO Order may be entered on behalf of the issuer and only by one member organization; (ii) the limit price of the IDO Order must be equal to the lowest price of the price range established by the issuer in its effective registration statement; (iii) the IDO Order must be for the quantity of shares offered by the issuer, as disclosed in the prospectus in the effective registration statement; (iv) an IDO Order may not be cancelled or modified; and (v) an IDO Order must be executed in full in the Direct Listing Auction. See Rule 7.31(c)(1)(D)(i)–(v). 14 See Approval Order, supra note 12, 85 FR 85813. See also Notice, supra note 10, 87 FR 68563. See Rule 7.35A(d)(2)(A)(v) for a description about how the ‘‘Indication Reference Price’’ is determined for a security that is a Primary Direct Floor Listing. 15 The Exchange defines Auction Price in Rule 7.35(a)(6) as the price at which an Auction is conducted. In addition, Rule 7.35A sets forth requirements relating to the determination of the Auction Price by the DMM. For purposes of the proposal, ‘‘Auction Price’’ refers to the price at which trading would commence in a security to be opened in a Direct Listing Auction for a Primary Direct Floor Listing. See Notice, supra note 10, 87 FR 68559 n.13. 16 The Exchange states that references in the proposal to the price range established by the issuer in its effective registration statement are to the price range disclosed in the prospectus in such registration statement. See Notice, supra note 10, 87 FR 68559 n.14. Currently, the Exchange defines the price range established by the issuer in its effective registration statement as the ‘‘Primary Direct Floor Listing Auction Price Range.’’ See Rule 7.31(c)(1)(D)(ii). As discussed further below, the Exchange proposes to redefine the price range established by the issuer in its effective registration E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM Continued 21DEN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78138-78141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27648]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96501; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2022-55]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify 
the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule

December 15, 2022.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that, on December 9, 2022, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II 
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE American Options Fee 
Schedule (``Fee Schedule'') regarding the Firm Monthly Fee Cap. The 
Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective December 9, 
2022.\4\ The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange previously filed to amend the Fee Schedule on 
December 1, 2022 (SR-NYSEAMER-2022-54) and withdrew such filing on 
December 9, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing to amend the Fee Schedule to modify the 
Firm Monthly Fee Cap. The Exchange proposes to implement the rule 
change on December 9, 2022.
    The Exchange proposes to modify the Firm Monthly Fee Cap, which is 
set forth in Section I.I. of the Fee Schedule.\5\ Currently, a Firm's 
fees associated with Manual transactions are capped at $100,000 per 
month per Firm. A Firm currently may also qualify for a decreased fee 
cap by achieving tier levels in the American Customer Engagement 
Program (the ``ACE Program'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Fee Schedule, Section I.I., Firm Monthly Fee Cap, 
available at: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/american-options/NYSE_American_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf.
    \6\ See id., Section I.E., American Customer Engagement 
(``ACE'') Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to raise the Firm Monthly Fee Cap to $150,000 
per month per Firm and to eliminate the decreased fee caps for Firms 
that achieve ACE Program tiers, such that all Firms would be eligible 
for a $150,000 monthly fee cap. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to 
modify Section I.I. to replace references to a $100,000 cap with 
references to a $150,000 cap and to delete the sentence and table 
describing decreased fee caps offered to Firms that qualify for ACE 
Program tiers.\7\ The Exchange does not otherwise propose any changes 
to the provisions of the Firm Monthly Fee Cap. The incremental service 
fee of $0.01 per contract for Firm Manual transactions other than QCC 
Transactions will continue to apply once the Firm Monthly Fee Cap has 
been reached, and Royalty Fees and fees or volumes associated with 
Strategy Executions will continue to be excluded from the calculation 
of fees towards the Firm Monthly Fee Cap. Firm Facilitation Manual 
trades will also continue to be executed at the rate of $0.00 per 
contract regardless of whether a Firm has reached the Firm Monthly Fee 
Cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Exchange also proposes a conforming change to footnote 4 
in Section I.A. (Rates for Options transactions) of the Fee 
Schedule, which cross-references the Firm Monthly Fee Cap as set 
forth in Section I.I. The Exchange likewise proposes to modify 
footnote 4 to replace the reference to a $100,000 cap with a 
reference to a $150,000 cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed change, despite increasing 
the amount of the Firm Monthly Fee Cap, would continue to incentivize 
Firms to direct order flow to the Exchange to achieve the benefits of 
cap on their Manual transaction fees. The Exchange also notes that the 
proposed change would provide for a uniform fee cap amount that would 
be applicable to all Firms and sets the Firm Monthly Fee Cap at an 
amount similar to the firm fee cap established by another options 
exchange.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See, e.g., Nasdaq PHLX LLC, Options 7 Pricing Schedule, 
Section 4 (providing for a ``Monthly Firm Fee Cap'' capping firm 
fees at $150,000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, 
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and

[[Page 78139]]

other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its 
facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, 
issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The 
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over 
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services 
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission 
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and 
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the 
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market 
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors 
and listed companies.'' \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS 
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for 
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding 
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market 
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options 
trades.\12\ Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power 
in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. 
More specifically, in October 2022, the Exchange had less than 8% 
market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF 
options trades.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety 
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, 
available here: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthy-Weekly-Volume-Statistics.
    \13\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of 
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see 
id., the Exchange's market share in equity-based options was 7.68% 
for the month of October 2021 and 7.25% for the month of October 
2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of 
products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces 
constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated otherwise, changes 
to exchange transaction fees can have a direct effect on the ability of 
an exchange to compete for order flow.
    The proposed change to the Firm Monthly Fee Cap is reasonable 
because the Exchange believes the fee cap would continue to incentivize 
Firms to direct order flow to the Exchange to receive the benefits of 
capped fees for their Manual transactions. The Exchange also believes 
the proposed change is reasonable because it would provide for a fee 
cap amount that would be applicable to all Firms (regardless of their 
qualification for ACE Program tiers) and establishes a cap amount 
similar to that offered by another options exchange.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See note 8, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To the extent that the proposed change continues to attract volume 
to the Exchange, this order flow would continue to make the Exchange a 
more competitive venue for order execution, which, in turn, promotes 
just and equitable principles of trade and removes impediments to and 
perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system. The Exchange notes that all market participants stand to 
benefit from any increase in volume, which could promote market depth, 
facilitate tighter spreads and enhance price discovery, particularly to 
the extent the proposed change encourages market participants to 
utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue, and may lead to a 
corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants.
    Finally, to the extent the proposed change continues to attract 
greater volume and liquidity, the Exchange believes the proposed change 
would improve the Exchange's overall competitiveness and strengthen its 
market quality for all market participants. In the backdrop of the 
competitive environment in which the Exchange operates, the proposed 
rule change is a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase the 
depth of its market and improve its market share relative to its 
competitors. The Exchange's fees are constrained by intermarket 
competition, as market participants can choose to direct their order 
flow to any of the 16 options exchanges, including an exchange offering 
a monthly firm fee cap of a similar amount.\15\ The Exchange believes 
that proposed rule change is designed to continue to incent market 
participants to direct liquidity to the Exchange, and, to the extent 
they continue to be incentivized to aggregate their trading activity at 
the Exchange, that increased liquidity could promote market depth, 
price discovery and improvement, and enhanced order execution 
opportunities for all market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposed Rule Change Is an Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable 
allocation of its fees and credits. The proposed change is equitable 
because the modified Firm Monthly Fee Cap would apply to all Firms 
equally and, by eliminating the decreased caps available to Firms that 
achieve ACE Program tiers, would provide for the same fee cap amount 
for all Firms on their Manual transactions. The Exchange believes that 
the proposed changes are designed to continue to incent Firms to 
aggregate their executions at the Exchange as a primary execution 
venue. To the extent that the proposed change achieves its purpose in 
attracting more volume to the Exchange, this increased order flow would 
continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for, among other 
things, order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed rule 
change would improve market quality for all market participants on the 
Exchange and, as a consequence, attract more order flow to the 
Exchange, thereby improving market-wide quality and price discovery.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
    The Exchange believes that the modification of the Firm Monthly Fee 
Cap is not unfairly discriminatory because the fee cap, as proposed, 
would be available to all similarly situated Firms, any of which could 
continue to be incentivized to direct order flow to the Exchange to 
qualify for the fee cap. Moreover, the proposed change to the Firm 
Monthly Fee Cap is not unfairly discriminatory because it would apply 
the same fee cap amount to all Firms, regardless of whether they 
achieve ACE Program tiers.
    Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change would improve 
market quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a 
consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby improving 
market-wide quality and price discovery. The resulting increased volume 
and liquidity would provide more trading opportunities and tighter 
spreads to all market participants and thus would promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, 
in general, protect investors and the public interest.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant 
competitive forces, as described below in the

[[Page 78140]]

Exchange's statement regarding the burden on competition.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does 
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes 
that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional 
liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price 
discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities 
for all market participants. As a result, the Exchange believes that 
the proposed change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting 
Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, which 
promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of 
orders, large and small.'' \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 11, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to 
continue to attract order flow to the Exchange, which could increase 
the volumes of contracts traded on the Exchange. Greater liquidity 
benefits all market participants on the Exchange, and the Exchange 
believes that the proposed modification of the Firm Monthly Fee Cap 
(even though it would raise the amount of the fee cap) would continue 
to incentivize Firms to direct order flow to the Exchange to be 
eligible for the benefits of capped fees on Manual transactions, 
thereby promoting liquidity on the Exchange to the benefit of all 
market participants.
    Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one 
of the 16 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a 
particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange 
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other 
exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange. Based on publicly-
available information, and excluding index-based options, no single 
exchange has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of 
multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\17\ Therefore, no 
exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of 
multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. More specifically, 
in October 2022, the Exchange had less than 8% market share of executed 
volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See note 12, supra.
    \18\ See note 13, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this 
competitive environment because it modifies the Exchange's fees in a 
manner designed to continue to incent market participants to direct 
trading interest to the Exchange, to provide liquidity and to attract 
order flow. To the extent that Firms are incentivized to utilize the 
Exchange as a primary trading venue for all transactions, all of the 
Exchange's market participants should benefit from the improved market 
quality and increased opportunities for price improvement. The Exchange 
also notes that the proposed change increases the Firm Monthly Fee Cap 
to an amount similar to the fee cap offered by another options 
exchange. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. 
In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and 
consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with 
other exchanges.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \19\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 
19b-4 \20\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other 
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \21\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2022-55 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2022-55. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2022-55, and should be 
submitted on or before January 11, 2023.


[[Page 78141]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-27648 Filed 12-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.