Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Chicago, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Article 17, Rule 5, 77657-77660 [2022-27383]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2022 / Notices
a manner that encourages market
participants to continue to provide
liquidity and to send order flow to the
Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,20 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 21 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
PEARL–2022–54 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PEARL–2022–54. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PEARL–2022–54 and
should be submitted on or before
January 9, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–27376 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–96489; File No. SR–
NYSECHX–2022–31]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Chicago, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Article 17,
Rule 5
December 13, 2022.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on December
9, 2022, the NYSE Chicago, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Chicago’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
20 15
21 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:38 Dec 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77657
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Article 17, Rule 5 to (1) change how
Qualified Contingent Trade (‘‘QCT’’)
Cross Orders are handled in the
Exchange’s Brokerplex® order
management system, and (2) make
certain non-substantive conforming
changes. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Article 17, Rule 5 (Brokerplex) in order
to (1) change how QCT Cross Orders are
handled in the Exchange’s Brokerplex®
order management system, and (2) make
certain non-substantive conforming
changes.
Background and Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange provides the
Brokerplex order management system
for use by Institutional Broker
Representatives (‘‘IBRs’’),4 to receive,
transmit and hold orders from their
customers while seeking execution
within the NYSE Chicago Marketplace 5
4 IBRs are also known as Institutional Brokers or
‘‘IBs’’. The term ‘‘Institutional Broker’’ is defined in
Article 1, Rule 1(n) to mean a member of the
Exchange who is registered as an Institutional
Broker pursuant to the provisions of Article 17 and
has satisfied all Exchange requirements to operate
as an Institutional Broker on the Exchange.
5 During the transition to Pillar, the Exchange
added the phrase ‘‘NYSE Chicago Marketplace, as
applicable’’ in Article 17, Rule 5 as an alternative
to the term ‘‘Matching System’’ then used in the
Exchange’s rules. See Securities Exchange Act
Continued
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
77658
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2022 / Notices
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
or elsewhere in the National Market
System. Brokerplex also can be used to
record trade executions and send
transaction reports to a Trade Reporting
Facility (‘‘TRF’’), as defined in FINRA
Rules 6300 et seq., as amended from
time-to-time. Brokerplex can also be
used to initiate clearing submissions to
a Qualified Clearing Agency via the
Exchange’s reporting systems.
Orders may be entered into
Brokerplex manually by an IBR or
submitted by an Exchange-approved
electronic connection. With certain
enumerated exceptions,6 Brokerplex
accepts and handles all of the order
types, conditions and instructions
accepted by the NYSE Chicago
Marketplace pursuant to Rule 7.31. In
addition to the order types accepted by
the NYSE Chicago Marketplace,
Brokerplex permits entry and processing
of certain additional order types,
conditions and instructions accepted by
other market centers. Finally,
Brokerplex accepts and processes
certain specified order types, conditions
and instructions set forth in Article 17,
Rule 5(c)(3).
As set forth in Rule 7.31(g), a QCT
Cross Order is a Cross Order that is part
of a transaction consisting of two or
more component orders that qualifies
for a Contingent Order Exemption to the
Order Protection Rule pursuant to Rule
7.37(f)(5).7 QCT Cross Orders may thus
trade through both manual and
protected quotes but may not trade
through the Exchange BBO.8
QCT Cross Orders are only available
to IBRs. While IBRs are not required to
use Brokerplex to manage their orders,
including QCT Cross Orders, Brokerplex
facilitates the execution of QCT Cross
Orders by retaining the QCT Cross
Order information submitted by the
IBRs and providing such information to
IBRs in a format that assists IBRs in
processing orders and transactions,
responding to request for information
Release No. 86709 (August 20, 2019), 84 FR 44654,
44663 (August 26, 2019) (SR–NYSECHX–2019–08)
(Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change for
Trading Rules To Support the Transition of Trading
to the Pillar Trading Platform). ‘‘Matching System’’
is defined in Article 1, Rule 1(z) as one of the
electronic or automated order routing, execution
and reporting systems provided by the Exchange.
As discussed below, the term became obsolete
following the transition to Pillar and the Exchange
now proposes to delete it from Article 17, Rule 5.
6 Brokerplex does not accept the following orders
specified in Rule 7.31: Inside Limit Orders,
Auction-Only Orders, MPL Orders, Tracking
Orders, ISOs, Primary Only Orders, Primary Until
9:45 Orders, Primary After 3:55 Orders, Directed
Orders, Pegged Orders, Non-Display Remove
Modifier, Proactive if Crossed Modifier, Self-Trade
Prevention Modifier, and Minimum Trade Size
Modifier. See Article 17, Rule 5(c)(1).
7 See Rule 7.31(g).
8 See Rule 7.37(f)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:38 Dec 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
from customers and regulatory bodies
and for other legitimate business
purposes.9
As noted, many of the order types
specified in Rule 7.31 that would be
sent directly to the matching engine
cannot be entered into Brokerplex. As a
practical matter, IBR business on the
Exchange consists of facilitating crosses,
the majority of which are QCT Cross
Orders entered into Brokerplex via an
Exchange-approved electronic
connection or manually by an IBR.
Because QCT Cross Orders are exempt
from the Order Protection Rule, QCT
Cross Orders entered into Brokerplex
can be and usually are executed at
venues away from the Exchange. The
proposed rule change would require
that QCT Cross Orders entered into
Brokerplex be initially sent to execute
on the Exchange.
Amendment of Article 17, Rule 5(e)
Article 17, Rule 5(e) sets forth the
Brokerplex order handling and
transmission requirements. Currently,
QCT Cross Orders entered into
Brokerplex electronically or manually
by an IBR can either be submitted (1) to
the Exchange’s Matching System or the
NYSE Chicago Marketplace, as
applicable, to execute and then, if they
cannot be executed in the Exchange’s
Matching System or NYSE Chicago
Marketplace, as applicable, to another
destination according to the IBR’s
instructions,10 or (2) directly to another
trading center.11
The Exchange proposes to amend
Article 17, Rule 5(e)(1) to change how
QCT Cross Orders are handled in
Brokerplex. As proposed, QCT Cross
Orders entered into Brokerplex either
electronically or manually would be
sent to the NYSE Chicago Marketplace
to execute in the first instance and then
to other trading centers if the order
cannot be executed in the NYSE
Chicago Marketplace. In other words,
IBRs would no longer have the ability to
send QCT Cross Orders entered into
Brokerplex directly to another trading
center in the first instance as provided
for in Article 17, Rule 5(e)(1)(B).12
9 See
Article 17, Rule 5(b).
Article 17, Rule 5(e)(1)(A).
11 See Article 17, Rule 5(e)(1)(B).
12 As noted, the QCT Cross Order is a type of
Cross Order that is only available to IBRs. Cross
Orders are two-sided orders with instructions to
match the identified buy-side with the identified
sell-side at a specified price known as the ‘‘cross
price.’’ The Exchange will reject a QCT Cross Order
if the cross price is not between the BBO, unless
it meets Cross with Size requirements, in which
case the cross price can be equal to the BB (BO).
See Rule 7.31(g)(2). Other equities markets do not
have a comparable QCT Cross Order type.
10 See
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All other aspects of the Brokerplex
functionality would continue to operate
as described in Article 17, Rule 5.
Non-Substantive Conforming Changes
The Exchange proposes to amend
Article 17, Rule 5 to eliminate obsolete
references to the Exchange’s Matching
System. During its transition to the
Pillar trading system, the Exchange
defined ‘‘NYSE Chicago Marketplace’’
in Rule 1.1(p) to mean the electronic
securities communications and trading
facility of the Exchange through which
orders are processed or are consolidated
for execution and/or display. The
definition was intended to replace
references to the term ‘‘Matching
System’’ following the transition to
Pillar.13 Having transitioned to Pillar,
‘‘Matching System’’ is obsolete and the
Exchange proposes to delete the phrase
‘‘Exchange’s Matching System or the’’
before ‘‘NYSE Chicago Marketplace’’ in
each place that it appears in Article 17,
Rule 5. The Exchange also proposes a
non-substantive change in Article 17,
Rule 5(e)(2) by replacing the word
‘‘Institutional Broker’’ with ‘‘IBR’’.
Implementation
The Exchange anticipates the
technology changes associated with the
proposed change to Article 17, Rule 5
relating to QCT Cross Orders to be
implemented in the first quarter of 2023.
The Exchange will announce the
implementation date of this proposal via
a Brokerplex Release Note.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with section 6(b) of the Act,14
in general, and furthers the objectives of
section 6(b)(5),15 in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change would promote just
and equitable principles of trade and
protect investors and the public interest
by requiring that QCT Cross Orders
entered into Brokerplex be sent to the
Exchange for execution in the first
instance. Currently, IBRs can send QCT
Cross Orders entered into the Exchange13 See
note 5, supra.
U.S.C. 78f(b).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
14 15
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2022 / Notices
provided Brokerplex order management
system either to the Exchange or to an
away trading center. As proposed, QCT
Cross Orders entered into Brokerplex
could only be sent to the Exchange in
the first instance for execution. If there
is no opportunity to execute on the
Exchange, such orders would then be
sent to another trading center, at the
direction of the IBR. By requiring QCT
Cross Orders entered into Brokerplex to
be sent to the Exchange first rather than
allowing IBRs to execute such QCT
Cross Orders in away venues, the
Exchange believes that the proposal
would enhance the likelihood of QCT
Cross Orders to be executed on the
Exchange, thereby enabling the
Exchange to better compete with other
trading centers for the execution of such
orders when those orders are entered
into Exchange systems.
As noted, although IBRs are not
required to use Brokerplex to manage
their orders, Brokerplex facilitates entry
and execution of QCT Cross Orders by
providing IBRs with a comprehensive
recordkeeping solution for such orders,
which contain both equities and options
legs.16 To the extent that IBRs utilize
Brokerplex in order to facilitate their
QCT Cross Order business, the
Exchange believes that such orders
should be required to be executed on
the Exchange. The current functionality
permits IBRs that utilize Brokerplex to
immediately send those orders to away
venues. The Exchange believes that if
IBRs utilize Brokerplex to facilitate QCT
Cross Orders, it would be fair and
consistent with just and equitable
principles of trade for those orders to be
executed on the Exchange. As noted
above, a number of order types
enumerated in Rule 7.31 currently
interact with the Exchange’s order book
first. Unlike those order types, which as
noted are not eligible to be entered into
Brokerplex, QCT Cross Orders entered
into Brokerplex, do not automatically
interact with the NYSE Chicago
Marketplace. QCT Cross Orders, for the
most part, are routed away for execution
because they can trade through a
protected quote. The Exchange therefore
believes that it is just and equitable to
require QCT Cross Orders entered into
Brokerplex to be treated similarly to
these other order types and sent to the
Exchange for execution in the first
instance.
In addition, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change is
consistent with section 6(b) of the Act,17
in general, and with section 6(b)(1) 18 in
Article 17, Rule 5(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
particular, in that it enables the
Exchange to be so organized as to have
the capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Exchange Act and to
comply, and to enforce compliance by
its exchange members and persons
associated with its exchange members,
with the provisions of the Exchange Act,
the rules and regulations thereunder,
and the rules of the Exchange. In
particular, the Exchange believes that
the proposed non-substantive
conforming changes to delete the words
‘‘Matching System’’ throughout Article
17, Rule 5 and replacing the word
‘‘Institutional Broker’’ with ‘‘IBR’’ in
Article 17, Rule 5(e)(2) would add
clarity, consistency and transparency to
the Exchange’s rules. The Exchange
believes that adding such clarity,
consistency and transparency would
also be consistent with the public
interest and the protection of investors
because investors will not be harmed
and in fact would benefit from increased
transparency, thereby reducing potential
confusion.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes that by requiring
QCT Cross Orders entered into
Brokerplex to be sent to the Exchange
before other trading centers, the
proposed rule change would increase
opportunities for these orders to be
executed on the Exchange, thereby
improving the Exchange’s ability to
compete with other trading centers for
the execution of QCT Cross Orders.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 19 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.20 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
16 See
17 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:38 Dec 16, 2022
19 15
20 17
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77659
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under section 19(b)(2)(B) 21 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSECHX–2022–31 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to: Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSECHX–2022–31. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
21 15
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
19DEN1
77660
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2022 / Notices
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSECHX–2022–31 and
should be submitted on or before
January 9, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–27383 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–96481; File No. SR–GEMX–
2022–12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend FINRA Fees
December 13, 2022.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
7, 2022, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
GEMX’s Pricing Schedule at Options 7,
Section 5, Legal & Regulatory, to reflect
adjustments to FINRA Registration Fees
and Fingerprinting Fees.
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:38 Dec 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
While the changes proposed herein
are effective upon filing, the Exchange
has designated the additional processing
of each initial or amended Form U4,
Form U5 or Form BD and electronic
Fingerprint Processing Fees to become
operative on January 2, 2023.
Additionally, the Exchange designates
that the FINRA Annual System
Processing Fee Assessed only during
Renewals become operative on January
2, 2024.3 The amendments to the paper
Fingerprint Fees are immediately
effective.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/gemx/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
This proposal amends Options 7,
Section 5, Legal & Regulatory, to reflect
adjustments to FINRA Registration Fees
and Fingerprinting Fees.4 The FINRA
fees are collected and retained by
FINRA via Web CRD for the registration
of employees of GEMX Members that
are not FINRA members (‘‘Non-FINRA
members’’). The Exchange is merely
listing these fees on its Pricing
Schedule. The Exchange does not
collect or retain these fees.
The Exchange proposes to amend: (1)
the $110 fee for the additional
processing of each initial or amended
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90176
(October 14, 2020), 85 FR 66592 (October 20, 2020)
(SR–FINRA–2020–032) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Adjust FINRA Fees To Provide Sustainable
Funding for FINRA’s Regulatory Mission).
4 FINRA operates Web CRD, the central licensing
and registration system for the U.S. securities
industry. FINRA uses Web CRD to maintain the
qualification, employment and disciplinary
histories of registered associated persons of brokerdealers.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Form U4, Form U5 or Form BD that
includes the initial reporting,
amendment, or certification or one or
more disclosure events or proceedings
to $155; (2) the $45 FINRA Annual
System Processing Fee Assessed only
during Renewals to $70; and (3) the $15
Second Submission (Electronic)
Fingerprint Processing Fee to $20. Each
of these fees are listed within GEMX
Options 7, Section 5. These
amendments are being made in
accordance with a FINRA rule change to
adjust to its fees.5
The Exchange also proposes to amend
the following Fingerprint Fees: (1) the
$29.50 Initial Submission (Electronic)
fee to $31.25; 6 (2) the $44.50 Initial
Submission (Paper) fee to $41.25; 7 (3)
the $29.50 Third Submission
(Electronic) fee to $31.25; 8 and (4) the
$44.50 Third Submission (Paper) fee to
$41.25.9 Specifically, today, the FBI
fingerprint charge is $11.25 10 and the
FINRA electronic Fingerprint Fee will
increase from $15 to $20 in 2023.11
While FINRA did not amend the paper
Fingerprint Fee, previously the FBI Fee
was reduced from $14.50 to $11.25.12
The paper Fingerprint Fees are not
currently reflecting the amount assessed
by FINRA. The amendment to the paper
Fingerprint Fees will conform these fees
with those of FINRA.
The FINRA Web CRD Fees are userbased and there is no distinction in the
cost incurred by FINRA if the user is a
FINRA member or a Non-FINRA
member. Accordingly, the proposed fees
mirror those currently assessed by
FINRA.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with section 6(b)
5 See note 4. FINRA noted in its rule change that
it was adjusting its fees to provide sustainable
funding for FINRA’s regulatory mission.
6 This fee includes a $20.00 FINRA fee and $11.25
FBI fee). See https://www.finra.org/registrationexams-ce/classic-crd/fingerprints/fingerprint-fees.
7 This fee includes a $30 FINRA Fee and a $11.25
FBI Fee. See https://www.finra.org/registrationexams-ce/classic-crd/fingerprints/fingerprint-fees.
8 This fee includes a $20.00 FINRA fee and $11.25
FBI fee). See https://www.finra.org/registrationexams-ce/classic-crd/fingerprints/fingerprint-fees.
9 This fee includes a $30 FINRA Fee and a $11.25
FBI Fee. See https://www.finra.org/registrationexams-ce/classic-crd/fingerprints/fingerprint-fees.
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67247
(June 25, 2012) 77 FR 38866 (June 29, 2012) (SR–
FINRA–2012–030) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Sections 4 and 6 of Schedule A to the FINRA ByLaws Regarding Fees Relating to the Central
Registration Depository) (‘‘2012 Rule Change’’)
11 See note 4.
12 See 2012 Rule Change at note 6. The FBI does
not charge its fee on a second fingerprint
transaction when it identifies the first set of
fingerprints as illegible for the same individual.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 242 (Monday, December 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77657-77660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27383]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-96489; File No. SR-NYSECHX-2022-31]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Chicago, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Article 17, Rule 5
December 13, 2022.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on December 9, 2022, the NYSE Chicago, Inc. (``NYSE Chicago'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Article 17, Rule 5 to (1) change how
Qualified Contingent Trade (``QCT'') Cross Orders are handled in the
Exchange's Brokerplex[supreg] order management system, and (2) make
certain non-substantive conforming changes. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Article 17, Rule 5 (Brokerplex) in
order to (1) change how QCT Cross Orders are handled in the Exchange's
Brokerplex[supreg] order management system, and (2) make certain non-
substantive conforming changes.
Background and Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange provides the Brokerplex order management system for
use by Institutional Broker Representatives (``IBRs''),\4\ to receive,
transmit and hold orders from their customers while seeking execution
within the NYSE Chicago Marketplace \5\
[[Page 77658]]
or elsewhere in the National Market System. Brokerplex also can be used
to record trade executions and send transaction reports to a Trade
Reporting Facility (``TRF''), as defined in FINRA Rules 6300 et seq.,
as amended from time-to-time. Brokerplex can also be used to initiate
clearing submissions to a Qualified Clearing Agency via the Exchange's
reporting systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ IBRs are also known as Institutional Brokers or ``IBs''. The
term ``Institutional Broker'' is defined in Article 1, Rule 1(n) to
mean a member of the Exchange who is registered as an Institutional
Broker pursuant to the provisions of Article 17 and has satisfied
all Exchange requirements to operate as an Institutional Broker on
the Exchange.
\5\ During the transition to Pillar, the Exchange added the
phrase ``NYSE Chicago Marketplace, as applicable'' in Article 17,
Rule 5 as an alternative to the term ``Matching System'' then used
in the Exchange's rules. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
86709 (August 20, 2019), 84 FR 44654, 44663 (August 26, 2019) (SR-
NYSECHX-2019-08) (Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change for
Trading Rules To Support the Transition of Trading to the Pillar
Trading Platform). ``Matching System'' is defined in Article 1, Rule
1(z) as one of the electronic or automated order routing, execution
and reporting systems provided by the Exchange. As discussed below,
the term became obsolete following the transition to Pillar and the
Exchange now proposes to delete it from Article 17, Rule 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orders may be entered into Brokerplex manually by an IBR or
submitted by an Exchange-approved electronic connection. With certain
enumerated exceptions,\6\ Brokerplex accepts and handles all of the
order types, conditions and instructions accepted by the NYSE Chicago
Marketplace pursuant to Rule 7.31. In addition to the order types
accepted by the NYSE Chicago Marketplace, Brokerplex permits entry and
processing of certain additional order types, conditions and
instructions accepted by other market centers. Finally, Brokerplex
accepts and processes certain specified order types, conditions and
instructions set forth in Article 17, Rule 5(c)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Brokerplex does not accept the following orders specified in
Rule 7.31: Inside Limit Orders, Auction-Only Orders, MPL Orders,
Tracking Orders, ISOs, Primary Only Orders, Primary Until 9:45
Orders, Primary After 3:55 Orders, Directed Orders, Pegged Orders,
Non-Display Remove Modifier, Proactive if Crossed Modifier, Self-
Trade Prevention Modifier, and Minimum Trade Size Modifier. See
Article 17, Rule 5(c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As set forth in Rule 7.31(g), a QCT Cross Order is a Cross Order
that is part of a transaction consisting of two or more component
orders that qualifies for a Contingent Order Exemption to the Order
Protection Rule pursuant to Rule 7.37(f)(5).\7\ QCT Cross Orders may
thus trade through both manual and protected quotes but may not trade
through the Exchange BBO.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Rule 7.31(g).
\8\ See Rule 7.37(f)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
QCT Cross Orders are only available to IBRs. While IBRs are not
required to use Brokerplex to manage their orders, including QCT Cross
Orders, Brokerplex facilitates the execution of QCT Cross Orders by
retaining the QCT Cross Order information submitted by the IBRs and
providing such information to IBRs in a format that assists IBRs in
processing orders and transactions, responding to request for
information from customers and regulatory bodies and for other
legitimate business purposes.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Article 17, Rule 5(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted, many of the order types specified in Rule 7.31 that would
be sent directly to the matching engine cannot be entered into
Brokerplex. As a practical matter, IBR business on the Exchange
consists of facilitating crosses, the majority of which are QCT Cross
Orders entered into Brokerplex via an Exchange-approved electronic
connection or manually by an IBR. Because QCT Cross Orders are exempt
from the Order Protection Rule, QCT Cross Orders entered into
Brokerplex can be and usually are executed at venues away from the
Exchange. The proposed rule change would require that QCT Cross Orders
entered into Brokerplex be initially sent to execute on the Exchange.
Amendment of Article 17, Rule 5(e)
Article 17, Rule 5(e) sets forth the Brokerplex order handling and
transmission requirements. Currently, QCT Cross Orders entered into
Brokerplex electronically or manually by an IBR can either be submitted
(1) to the Exchange's Matching System or the NYSE Chicago Marketplace,
as applicable, to execute and then, if they cannot be executed in the
Exchange's Matching System or NYSE Chicago Marketplace, as applicable,
to another destination according to the IBR's instructions,\10\ or (2)
directly to another trading center.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Article 17, Rule 5(e)(1)(A).
\11\ See Article 17, Rule 5(e)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend Article 17, Rule 5(e)(1) to change
how QCT Cross Orders are handled in Brokerplex. As proposed, QCT Cross
Orders entered into Brokerplex either electronically or manually would
be sent to the NYSE Chicago Marketplace to execute in the first
instance and then to other trading centers if the order cannot be
executed in the NYSE Chicago Marketplace. In other words, IBRs would no
longer have the ability to send QCT Cross Orders entered into
Brokerplex directly to another trading center in the first instance as
provided for in Article 17, Rule 5(e)(1)(B).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ As noted, the QCT Cross Order is a type of Cross Order that
is only available to IBRs. Cross Orders are two-sided orders with
instructions to match the identified buy-side with the identified
sell-side at a specified price known as the ``cross price.'' The
Exchange will reject a QCT Cross Order if the cross price is not
between the BBO, unless it meets Cross with Size requirements, in
which case the cross price can be equal to the BB (BO). See Rule
7.31(g)(2). Other equities markets do not have a comparable QCT
Cross Order type.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All other aspects of the Brokerplex functionality would continue to
operate as described in Article 17, Rule 5.
Non-Substantive Conforming Changes
The Exchange proposes to amend Article 17, Rule 5 to eliminate
obsolete references to the Exchange's Matching System. During its
transition to the Pillar trading system, the Exchange defined ``NYSE
Chicago Marketplace'' in Rule 1.1(p) to mean the electronic securities
communications and trading facility of the Exchange through which
orders are processed or are consolidated for execution and/or display.
The definition was intended to replace references to the term
``Matching System'' following the transition to Pillar.\13\ Having
transitioned to Pillar, ``Matching System'' is obsolete and the
Exchange proposes to delete the phrase ``Exchange's Matching System or
the'' before ``NYSE Chicago Marketplace'' in each place that it appears
in Article 17, Rule 5. The Exchange also proposes a non-substantive
change in Article 17, Rule 5(e)(2) by replacing the word
``Institutional Broker'' with ``IBR''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See note 5, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation
The Exchange anticipates the technology changes associated with the
proposed change to Article 17, Rule 5 relating to QCT Cross Orders to
be implemented in the first quarter of 2023. The Exchange will announce
the implementation date of this proposal via a Brokerplex Release Note.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) of the
Act,\14\ in general, and furthers the objectives of section
6(b)(5),\15\ in particular, because it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed change would promote just
and equitable principles of trade and protect investors and the public
interest by requiring that QCT Cross Orders entered into Brokerplex be
sent to the Exchange for execution in the first instance. Currently,
IBRs can send QCT Cross Orders entered into the Exchange-
[[Page 77659]]
provided Brokerplex order management system either to the Exchange or
to an away trading center. As proposed, QCT Cross Orders entered into
Brokerplex could only be sent to the Exchange in the first instance for
execution. If there is no opportunity to execute on the Exchange, such
orders would then be sent to another trading center, at the direction
of the IBR. By requiring QCT Cross Orders entered into Brokerplex to be
sent to the Exchange first rather than allowing IBRs to execute such
QCT Cross Orders in away venues, the Exchange believes that the
proposal would enhance the likelihood of QCT Cross Orders to be
executed on the Exchange, thereby enabling the Exchange to better
compete with other trading centers for the execution of such orders
when those orders are entered into Exchange systems.
As noted, although IBRs are not required to use Brokerplex to
manage their orders, Brokerplex facilitates entry and execution of QCT
Cross Orders by providing IBRs with a comprehensive recordkeeping
solution for such orders, which contain both equities and options
legs.\16\ To the extent that IBRs utilize Brokerplex in order to
facilitate their QCT Cross Order business, the Exchange believes that
such orders should be required to be executed on the Exchange. The
current functionality permits IBRs that utilize Brokerplex to
immediately send those orders to away venues. The Exchange believes
that if IBRs utilize Brokerplex to facilitate QCT Cross Orders, it
would be fair and consistent with just and equitable principles of
trade for those orders to be executed on the Exchange. As noted above,
a number of order types enumerated in Rule 7.31 currently interact with
the Exchange's order book first. Unlike those order types, which as
noted are not eligible to be entered into Brokerplex, QCT Cross Orders
entered into Brokerplex, do not automatically interact with the NYSE
Chicago Marketplace. QCT Cross Orders, for the most part, are routed
away for execution because they can trade through a protected quote.
The Exchange therefore believes that it is just and equitable to
require QCT Cross Orders entered into Brokerplex to be treated
similarly to these other order types and sent to the Exchange for
execution in the first instance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Article 17, Rule 5(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with section 6(b) of the Act,\17\ in general, and with
section 6(b)(1) \18\ in particular, in that it enables the Exchange to
be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Exchange Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance
by its exchange members and persons associated with its exchange
members, with the provisions of the Exchange Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange. In particular,
the Exchange believes that the proposed non-substantive conforming
changes to delete the words ``Matching System'' throughout Article 17,
Rule 5 and replacing the word ``Institutional Broker'' with ``IBR'' in
Article 17, Rule 5(e)(2) would add clarity, consistency and
transparency to the Exchange's rules. The Exchange believes that adding
such clarity, consistency and transparency would also be consistent
with the public interest and the protection of investors because
investors will not be harmed and in fact would benefit from increased
transparency, thereby reducing potential confusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that
by requiring QCT Cross Orders entered into Brokerplex to be sent to the
Exchange before other trading centers, the proposed rule change would
increase opportunities for these orders to be executed on the Exchange,
thereby improving the Exchange's ability to compete with other trading
centers for the execution of QCT Cross Orders.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \19\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\20\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
section 19(b)(2)(B) \21\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSECHX-2022-31 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSECHX-2022-31. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
[[Page 77660]]
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSECHX-2022-31 and should
be submitted on or before January 9, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-27383 Filed 12-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P