Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (Rebar) From Japan, Taiwan and Turkey; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews, 77636-77637 [2022-27374]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
77636
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2022 / Notices
reimbursable share of costs to
rehabilitate Arrowrock Dam Outlet
Gates under the O&M program.
Completed contract actions:
8. Benton ID, Yakima Project,
Washington: Replacement contract to,
among other things, withdraw Benton
ID from the Sunnyside Division Board
of Control; provide for direct payment of
Benton ID’s share of total operation,
maintenance, repair, and replacement
costs incurred by the United States in
operation of storage division; and
establish Benton ID responsibility for
operation, maintenance, repair, and
replacement for irrigation distribution
system. Contract executed on April 7,
2021.
14. Quincy-Columbia Basin ID,
Columbia Basin Project, Washington:
Long-term contract to renew master
water service contract No. 14–06–100–
9166, as supplemented, to authorize the
District to deliver project water to up to
10,000 First Phase Continuation Acres
located within the District, and to
deliver additional project water to land
irrigated under the District’s repayment
contract during the peak period of
irrigation water use annually. Contract
executed on October 7, 2021.
California-Great Basin—Interior
Region 10: Bureau of Reclamation, 2800
Cottage Way, Sacramento, California
95825–1898, telephone 916–978–5250.
New contract actions:
49. San Luis Canal Company, Central
California ID, Firebaugh Canal Water
District, Columbia Canal Company
(collectively San Joaquin River
Exchange Contractors), CVP, California:
Amend 1968 Second Amended Contract
for Exchange of Waters.
Modified contract actions:
9. Tuolumne Utilities District
(formerly Tuolumne Regional WD),
CVP, California: Long-term water
service contract for up to 6,000 acre-feet
from New Melones Reservoir, and
possibly a long-term contract for storage
of non-project water in New Melones
Reservoir.
11. San Luis WD, CVP, California:
Proposed partial assignment of 4,449
acre-feet of the District’s CVP supply to
Santa Nella County WD for M&I use.
Discontinued contract action:
4. Redwood Valley County WD,
SRPA, California: Restructuring the
repayment schedule pursuant to Public
Law 100–516.
Christopher Beardsley,
Director, Policy and Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022–27431 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:38 Dec 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–540–541 (Fifth
Review)]
Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe
From South Korea and Taiwan
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on certain
welded stainless steel pipe from South
Korea and Taiwan would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on May 2, 2022 (87 FR 25668)
and determined on August 5, 2022, that
it would conduct expedited reviews (87
FR 64112, October 21, 2022).
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these reviews on December 14, 2022.
The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 5395
(December 2022), entitled Welded
Stainless Steel Pipe from South Korea
and Taiwan: Investigation Nos. 731–
TA–540–541 (Fifth Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 14, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–27452 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–564 and 731–
TA–1338–1340 (Review)]
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (Rebar)
From Japan, Taiwan and Turkey;
Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year
Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
SUMMARY:
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the countervailing duty
order on steel concrete reinforcing bar
(rebar) from Turkey and the
antidumping duty orders on steel
concrete reinforcing bar from Japan,
Taiwan and Turkey would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
DATES: September 6, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stamen Borisson (202–205–3125), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On September 6, 2022,
the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (87
FR 33206, June 1, 2022) of the subject
five-year reviews was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
For further information concerning
the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews has been
placed in the nonpublic record, and will
be made available to persons on the
Administrative Protective Order service
list for these reviews on December 16,
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s website.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2022 / Notices
tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
2022. A public version will be issued
thereafter, pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of
the Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
§ 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules,
interested parties that are parties to the
reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the
reviews. Comments are due on or before
December 23, 2022 and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to these reviews
by December 23, 2022. However, should
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for
its completion of the final results of its
reviews, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of §§ 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s Handbook on
Filing Procedures, available on the
Commission’s website at https://
www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_
on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates
upon the Commission’s procedures with
respect to filings.
In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and
207.3 of the rules, each document filed
by a party to the reviews must be served
on all other parties to the reviews (as
identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined these reviews are
extraordinarily complicated and
therefore has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by
up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of
the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is
2 The Commission has found the response filed
on behalf of the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and
its individual members, Nucor Corporation, Gerdau
Ameristeel US Inc., Commercial Metals Company,
Byer Steel, and Steel Dynamics, Inc., domestic
producers of rebar, to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:38 Dec 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
published pursuant to § 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 13, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–27374 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy
Rules; Hearing of the Judicial
Conference
Judicial Conference of the
United States.
ACTION: Advisory Committee on
Bankruptcy Rules; Notice of
cancellation of open hearing.
AGENCY:
The following public hearing
on proposed amendments to the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been
canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing on
January 13, 2023. The announcement for
this hearing was previously published
in the Federal Register on August 5,
2022.
DATES: January 13, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H.
Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief Counsel,
Rules Committee Staff, Administrative
Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood
Marshall Federal Judiciary Building,
One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7–300,
Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202)
502–1820, RulesCommittee_Secretary@
ao.uscourts.gov.
SUMMARY:
(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073)
Dated: December 14, 2022.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2022–27434 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
77637
A hearing was held before DEA
Administrative Law Judge Paul E.
Soeffing (the ALJ) who, on April 5,
2022, issued his Recommended Rulings,
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law,
and Decision of the Administrative Law
Judge (RD).2 Having reviewed the entire
record, the Agency adopts and hereby
incorporates by reference the entirety of
the ALJ’s rulings, credibility findings,
findings of fact, conclusions of law,
sanctions analysis, and recommended
sanction in the RD and summarizes and
expands upon portions thereof herein.
I. Findings of Fact
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(f), 824(a)(4),
the Government seeks revocation of
Respondent’s DEA registration because
Respondent allegedly committed acts
rendering his continued registration
inconsistent with the public interest,
including: (1) improperly prescribing
controlled substances; (2) failing to
maintain medical records; and (3)
engaging in unlawful electronic
prescribing practices. OSC/ISO, at 1.
Respondent issued the controlled
substance prescriptions at issue in this
case to Patients W.G., P.L., T.E., D.P.,
N.R., and L.C. without maintaining any
medical records. RD, at 28.3 According
to the credible, unrebutted, expert
testimony of Dr. Gene Kennedy,
Respondent issued all of these
controlled substance prescriptions
outside the usual course of professional
practice and beneath the applicable
standard of care due to Respondent’s
lack of medical records. Id. at 28 (citing
Tr. 118–31, 344). The record showed
that Respondent could not produce any
records for these six patients. RD, at 28
(citing Tr. 249–50; 323). In addition, Dr.
Kennedy credibly testified that the
controlled substance prescriptions for
L.P. and P.B. were issued outside the
usual course of professional practice
and beneath the applicable standard of
care because Respondent’s partial
medical records did not adequately
support his prescribing. RD, at 29–31.
Finally, the record established that
Respondent permitted his wife and son
[Docket No. 21–35]
Allan Alexander Rashford, M.D.;
Decision and Order
On September 23, 2021, the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA or
Government) issued an Order to Show
Cause and Immediate Suspension of
Registration (OSC/ISO) to Allan
Alexander Rashford, M.D. (Respondent)
of Charleston, South Carolina.1 OSC/
ISO, at 1.
1 Respondent holds a DEA Certificate of
Registration no. AR1001306 at the registered
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
address of 903 Saint Andrews Blvd. Suite B,
Charleston, SC 29407–7194. OSC/ISO, at 1–2.
2 Neither party filed exceptions.
3 The parties entered into 46 stipulations, all of
which are incorporated into this Decision. RD, at 2–
10. On January 29, 2020, Respondent entered into
a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with DEA,
which remains in effect for three years, and which
prohibited Respondent from prescribing Schedule II
controlled substances, required Respondent to
maintain proper medical files on all patients to
whom Respondent issued controlled substance
prescriptions, and required Respondent to maintain
medical records in a readily retrievable manner.
The Agency agrees with the ALJ’s consideration of
the violations of the MOA in the Sanctions section.
See RD, at n.12.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 242 (Monday, December 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77636-77637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27374]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-564 and 731-TA-1338-1340 (Review)]
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (Rebar) From Japan, Taiwan and
Turkey; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of
expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to
determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on steel
concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Turkey and the antidumping duty
orders on steel concrete reinforcing bar from Japan, Taiwan and Turkey
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.
DATES: September 6, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stamen Borisson (202-205-3125), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On September 6, 2022, the Commission determined that
the domestic interested party group response to its notice of
institution (87 FR 33206, June 1, 2022) of the subject five-year
reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews.\1\
Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's website.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201),
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews has been placed in the nonpublic record,
and will be made available to persons on the Administrative Protective
Order service list for these reviews on December 16,
[[Page 77637]]
2022. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to Sec.
207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in Sec. 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are
due on or before December 23, 2022 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement
(which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to
these reviews by December 23, 2022. However, should the Department of
Commerce (``Commerce'') extend the time limit for its completion of the
final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not
contain new factual information) on Commerce's final results is three
business days after the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments
contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with
the requirements of Sec. Sec. 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission's rules. The Commission's Handbook on Filing Procedures,
available on the Commission's website at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the
Commission's procedures with respect to filings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has found the response filed on behalf of the
Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual members, Nucor
Corporation, Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc., Commercial Metals Company,
Byer Steel, and Steel Dynamics, Inc., domestic producers of rebar,
to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties
will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Sec. Sec. 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules,
each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all
other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination.--The Commission has determined these reviews are
extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise
its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant
to Sec. 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 13, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-27374 Filed 12-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P