Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule, 76530-76532 [2022-27053]
Download as PDF
76530
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2022 / Notices
In sum, if the change proposed herein
is unattractive to market participants, it
is likely that the Exchange will lose
market share as a result. Accordingly,
the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change will impair the ability
of members or competing order
execution venues to maintain their
competitive standing in the financial
markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.8
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2022–070 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2022–070. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Dec 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2022–070 and
should be submitted on or before
January 4, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–27051 Filed 12–13–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–96466; File No. SR–
CboeEDGX–2022–052]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Fee Schedule
December 8, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
1, 2022, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX Options’’)
proposes to amend its Fee Schedule.
The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule to eliminate two Market
Maker Volume Tiers, effective December
1, 2022.
The Exchange first notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. More
specifically, the Exchange is only one of
16 options venues to which market
participants may direct their order flow.
Based on publicly available information,
no single options exchange has more
than 18% of the market share and
currently the Exchange represents only
approximately 6% of the market share.3
Thus, in such a low-concentrated and
3 See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market
Monthly Volume Summary (November 30, 2022),
available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/
market_statistics/.
9 17
PO 00000
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2022 / Notices
highly competitive market, no single
options exchange, including the
Exchange, possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of option order
flow. The Exchange believes that the
ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month
demonstrates that market participants
can shift order flow or discontinue to
reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes.
Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain the Exchange’s transaction
fees, and market participants can readily
trade on competing venues if they deem
pricing levels at those other venues to
be more favorable.
The Exchange’s Fees Schedule sets
forth standard rebates and rates applied
per contract. For example, the Exchange
assesses a standard fee of $0.20 per
contract for Market Maker orders that
add liquidity in both Penny and NonPenny Securities. The Fee Codes and
Associated Fees section of the Fees
Schedule also provides for certain fee
codes associated with certain order
types and market participants that
provide for various other fees or rebates.
Additionally, the Fee Schedule offers
tiered pricing which provides
Members 4 opportunities to qualify for
higher rebates or reduced fees where
certain volume criteria and thresholds
are met. Additionally, in response to the
competitive environment, the Exchange
also offers tiered pricing, which
provides Members with opportunities to
qualify for higher rebates or reduced
fees where certain volume criteria and
thresholds are met. Tiered pricing
provides an incremental incentive for
Members to strive for higher tier levels,
which provides increasingly higher
benefits or discounts for satisfying
increasingly more stringent criteria.
For example, pursuant to Footnote 2
of the Fees Schedule, the Exchange
currently offers eight Market Maker
Volume Tiers which provide reduced
fees between $0.01 and $0.17 per
contract for qualifying Market Makers
orders that yield fee code PM or NM
where a Member meets the respective
tiers’ volume thresholds.5 In particular,
Market Maker Volume Tier 7 provides a
reduced fee of $0.04 per contract for a
Member’s qualifying orders (i.e.,
yielding fee code PM or NM) if a
Member: (1) has an ADV in Customer
orders greater than or equal to 0.70% of
average OCV; (2) has an ADV in
Customer or Market Maker orders
greater than or equal to 0.50% of
average OCV; (3) has an ADV in AIM
4 See
Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
Cboe EDGX U.S. Options Exchange Fees
Schedule, Footnote 2, Market Maker Volume Tiers.
5 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
Agency Orders greater than or equal to
0.30% of average OCV; and (4) has an
ADV in complex Customer orders
(yielding fee codes ZA, ZB, ZC, or ZD)
greater than or equal to 0.10% of
average OCV. Market Maker Volume
Tier 8 provides a reduced fee of $0.03
per contract for a Member’s qualifying
orders (i.e., yielding fee code PM or NM)
if a Member: (1) has an ADV in
Customer orders greater than or equal to
1.00% of average OCV; (2) has an ADV
in Customer or Market Maker orders
greater than or equal to 1.10% of
average OCV; (3) has an ADV in AIM
Agency Orders greater than or equal to
0.75% of average OCV; and (4) has an
ADV in complex Customer orders
(yielding fee codes ZA, ZB, ZC, or ZD)
greater than or equal to 0.20% of
average OCV. The Exchange notes that
no Member has reached either Tier 7 or
8 in several months and the Exchange
therefore proposes to eliminate these
Tiers from the Fees Schedule.6
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.7 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 8 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 9 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
6 In connection with the proposed elimination of
Tier 7, the Exchange also proposes to eliminate
references to the listed fee of ‘‘$0.04’’ for fee codes
PM and NM in the Standard Rates table as such
reduced fee will no longer be an option for MarketMaker orders that add liquidity. The Exchange
notes that it is not proposing to eliminate the
reference to ‘‘$0.03’’ notwithstanding the proposed
elimination of Tier 8 as another Market Maker
Volume Tier (i.e., Tier 5) currently also offers a
reduced fee of $0.03.
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76531
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
As described above, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient.
The Exchange believes that
eliminating Market Maker Volume Tiers
7 and 8 under Footnote 2 is reasonable
because the Exchange is not required to
maintain these tiers or provide reduced
fees. The Exchange also believes the
proposed change is reasonable because
no Members have reached these tiers in
several months. Further, Members still
have other opportunities to obtain
reduced fees, such as via Market Maker
Volume Tiers 1 through 6.10 The
Exchange believes that eliminating
Market Maker Volume Tiers 7 and 8 is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies
uniformly to all Members. The
Exchange also notes that the proposed
changes will not adversely impact any
Member’s ability to otherwise qualify
for reduced fees or enhanced rebates
offered under other tiers.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. In particular,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change does not impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Particularly,
the proposal to eliminate Market Maker
Volume Tiers 7 and 8 applies to all
Members, in that, such Tiers will not be
available for any Member. The Exchange
does not believe the proposed changes
burden competition as all Members will
continue to have an opportunity receive
enhanced rebates or reduced fees
offered under various tiers, including
Market Maker Volume Tiers 1 through
6, which tiers are generally designed to
increase the competitiveness of EDGX
and attract order flow and incentivize
participants to increase their
participation on the Exchange,
providing for additional execution
opportunities for market participants
and improved price transparency.
Greater overall order flow, trading
opportunities, and pricing transparency
benefit all market participants on the
Exchange by enhancing market quality
10 See Cboe EDGX Options Fees Schedule,
Footnote 2.
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
76532
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2022 / Notices
and continuing to encourage Members
to send orders, thereby contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced
market ecosystem.
The Exchange also believes the
proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
As previously discussed, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative
venues they may participate on and
direct their order flow, including 15
other options exchanges. Additionally,
the Exchange represents a small
percentage of the overall market. Based
on publicly available information, no
single options exchange has more than
18% of the market share. Therefore, no
exchange possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of order flow.
Indeed, participants can readily choose
to send their orders to other exchanges
if they deem fee levels at those other
venues to be more favorable. Moreover,
the Commission has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ The
fact that this market is competitive has
also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes
that competition for order flow is
‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n
the U.S. national market system, buyers
and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’. Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed
fee change imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 11 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 12 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Jkt 259001
[FR Doc. 2022–27053 Filed 12–13–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA–2022–0029]
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGX–2022–052. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
SUMMARY:
12 17
17:48 Dec 13, 2022
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeEDGX–2022–052 on the subject
line.
11 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
CboeEDGX–2022–052, and should be
submitted on or before January 4, 2023.
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Privacy Act of 1974; Matching Program
AGENCY:
Notice of a new matching
program.
ACTION:
In accordance with the
provisions of the Privacy Act, as
amended, this notice announces a new
matching program with The Department
of Veterans Affairs (VA), Veterans
Benefits Administration (VBA).
DATES: Submit comments on the
proposed matching program on or
before January 13, 2023. The matching
program will be applicable on March 6,
2023, or once a minimum of 30 days
after publication of this notice has
elapsed, whichever is later. The
matching program will be in effect for
a period of 18 months.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of three methods—internet,
fax, or mail. Do not submit the same
comments multiple times or by more
than one method. Regardless of which
13 17
Sfmt 4703
Social Security Administration
(SSA).
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
14DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76530-76532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27053]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-96466; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2022-052]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Fee Schedule
December 8, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 1, 2022, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX Options'')
proposes to amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to eliminate two
Market Maker Volume Tiers, effective December 1, 2022.
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 16 options venues to which market participants
may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available information,
no single options exchange has more than 18% of the market share and
currently the Exchange represents only approximately 6% of the market
share.\3\ Thus, in such a low-concentrated and
[[Page 76531]]
highly competitive market, no single options exchange, including the
Exchange, possesses significant pricing power in the execution of
option order flow. The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market
share among the exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market
participants can shift order flow or discontinue to reduce use of
certain categories of products, in response to fee changes.
Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the Exchange's transaction
fees, and market participants can readily trade on competing venues if
they deem pricing levels at those other venues to be more favorable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market Monthly Volume
Summary (November 30, 2022),available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/market_statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's Fees Schedule sets forth standard rebates and rates
applied per contract. For example, the Exchange assesses a standard fee
of $0.20 per contract for Market Maker orders that add liquidity in
both Penny and Non-Penny Securities. The Fee Codes and Associated Fees
section of the Fees Schedule also provides for certain fee codes
associated with certain order types and market participants that
provide for various other fees or rebates. Additionally, the Fee
Schedule offers tiered pricing which provides Members \4\ opportunities
to qualify for higher rebates or reduced fees where certain volume
criteria and thresholds are met. Additionally, in response to the
competitive environment, the Exchange also offers tiered pricing, which
provides Members with opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or
reduced fees where certain volume criteria and thresholds are met.
Tiered pricing provides an incremental incentive for Members to strive
for higher tier levels, which provides increasingly higher benefits or
discounts for satisfying increasingly more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, pursuant to Footnote 2 of the Fees Schedule, the
Exchange currently offers eight Market Maker Volume Tiers which provide
reduced fees between $0.01 and $0.17 per contract for qualifying Market
Makers orders that yield fee code PM or NM where a Member meets the
respective tiers' volume thresholds.\5\ In particular, Market Maker
Volume Tier 7 provides a reduced fee of $0.04 per contract for a
Member's qualifying orders (i.e., yielding fee code PM or NM) if a
Member: (1) has an ADV in Customer orders greater than or equal to
0.70% of average OCV; (2) has an ADV in Customer or Market Maker orders
greater than or equal to 0.50% of average OCV; (3) has an ADV in AIM
Agency Orders greater than or equal to 0.30% of average OCV; and (4)
has an ADV in complex Customer orders (yielding fee codes ZA, ZB, ZC,
or ZD) greater than or equal to 0.10% of average OCV. Market Maker
Volume Tier 8 provides a reduced fee of $0.03 per contract for a
Member's qualifying orders (i.e., yielding fee code PM or NM) if a
Member: (1) has an ADV in Customer orders greater than or equal to
1.00% of average OCV; (2) has an ADV in Customer or Market Maker orders
greater than or equal to 1.10% of average OCV; (3) has an ADV in AIM
Agency Orders greater than or equal to 0.75% of average OCV; and (4)
has an ADV in complex Customer orders (yielding fee codes ZA, ZB, ZC,
or ZD) greater than or equal to 0.20% of average OCV. The Exchange
notes that no Member has reached either Tier 7 or 8 in several months
and the Exchange therefore proposes to eliminate these Tiers from the
Fees Schedule.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Cboe EDGX U.S. Options Exchange Fees Schedule, Footnote
2, Market Maker Volume Tiers.
\6\ In connection with the proposed elimination of Tier 7, the
Exchange also proposes to eliminate references to the listed fee of
``$0.04'' for fee codes PM and NM in the Standard Rates table as
such reduced fee will no longer be an option for Market-Maker orders
that add liquidity. The Exchange notes that it is not proposing to
eliminate the reference to ``$0.03'' notwithstanding the proposed
elimination of Tier 8 as another Market Maker Volume Tier (i.e.,
Tier 5) currently also offers a reduced fee of $0.03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\7\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \8\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient.
The Exchange believes that eliminating Market Maker Volume Tiers 7
and 8 under Footnote 2 is reasonable because the Exchange is not
required to maintain these tiers or provide reduced fees. The Exchange
also believes the proposed change is reasonable because no Members have
reached these tiers in several months. Further, Members still have
other opportunities to obtain reduced fees, such as via Market Maker
Volume Tiers 1 through 6.\10\ The Exchange believes that eliminating
Market Maker Volume Tiers 7 and 8 is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies uniformly to all Members. The
Exchange also notes that the proposed changes will not adversely impact
any Member's ability to otherwise qualify for reduced fees or enhanced
rebates offered under other tiers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Cboe EDGX Options Fees Schedule, Footnote 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In particular, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change does not impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposal to
eliminate Market Maker Volume Tiers 7 and 8 applies to all Members, in
that, such Tiers will not be available for any Member. The Exchange
does not believe the proposed changes burden competition as all Members
will continue to have an opportunity receive enhanced rebates or
reduced fees offered under various tiers, including Market Maker Volume
Tiers 1 through 6, which tiers are generally designed to increase the
competitiveness of EDGX and attract order flow and incentivize
participants to increase their participation on the Exchange, providing
for additional execution opportunities for market participants and
improved price transparency. Greater overall order flow, trading
opportunities, and pricing transparency benefit all market participants
on the Exchange by enhancing market quality
[[Page 76532]]
and continuing to encourage Members to send orders, thereby
contributing towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative venues they may participate on and
direct their order flow, including 15 other options exchanges.
Additionally, the Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall
market. Based on publicly available information, no single options
exchange has more than 18% of the market share. Therefore, no exchange
possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order flow.
Indeed, participants can readily choose to send their orders to other
exchanges if they deem fee levels at those other venues to be more
favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically,
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' The fact that
this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow
is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .''. Accordingly, the Exchange
does not believe its proposed fee change imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \12\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2022-052 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2022-052. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2022-052, and
should be submitted on or before January 4, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-27053 Filed 12-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P