Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020-2021, 75589-75591 [2022-26782]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2022 / Notices
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
Respondents of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the EAR that has been or will
be exported from the United States,
including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction
whereby Respondents acquires or
attempts to acquire such ownership,
possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from Respondents of any
item subject to the EAR that has been
exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from Respondents in the
United States any item subject to the
EAR with knowledge or reason to know
that the item will be, or is intended to
be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the EAR that has
been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by Respondents
or service any item, of whatever origin,
that is owned, possessed or controlled
by Respondents if such service involves
the use of any item subject to the EAR
that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this
paragraph, servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification, or
testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the EAR, any other
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Respondents by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order.
In accordance with the provisions of
sections 766.24(e) of the EAR,
Respondents may, at any time, appeal
this Order by filing a full written
statement in support of the appeal with
the Office of the Administrative Law
Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing
Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202–4022.
In accordance with the provisions of
section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may
seek renewal of this Order by filing a
written request not later than 20 days
before the expiration date. A renewal
request may be opposed by Respondents
as provided in section 766.24(d), by
filing a written submission with the
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement, which must be
received not later than seven days
before the expiration date of the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be provided
to Respondents and shall be published
in the Federal Register.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Dec 08, 2022
Jkt 259001
This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect for 180 days.
Dated: December 5, 2022.
Kevin J. Kurland,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2022–26737 Filed 12–8–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–469–817]
Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No
Shipments; 2020–2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers or exporters subject to this
administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value during the period of review (POR),
August 1, 2020, through July 31, 2021.
We further determine that Alimentary
Group Dcoop S. Coop. And. (Dcoop) had
no shipments during the POR.
DATES: Applicable December 9, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Hansen or Claudia Cott, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–4270,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On June 8, 2022, Commerce published
the preliminary results of the 2020–2021
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on ripe olives
from Spain.1 This administrative review
covers five producers or exporters of the
subject merchandise, including the two
mandatory respondents, Agro Sevilla
Aceitunas, S. Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla),
and Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L.
(Camacho). We invited interested
parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results.2 On July 8, 2022, we received
case briefs from the domestic interested
party, Musco Family Olive Company
1 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020–
2021, 87 FR 34841 (June 8, 2022) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
2 See Preliminary Results, 87 FR at 34842.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75589
(Musco), and from the mandatory
respondents, Agro Sevilla and
Camacho.3 On July 15, 2022, Agro
Sevilla and Camacho submitted rebuttal
briefs.4 On September 12, 2022,
Commerce extended the deadline for the
final results by 60 days to December 5,
2022.5 Commerce conducted this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
Scope of the Order 6
The products covered by the Order
are ripe olives from Spain. For a full
description of the scope of the Order,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.7
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs that were submitted by
parties in this administrative review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum and are listed in the
appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed at
https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
3 See Musco’s Letters, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain;
3rd Administrative Review Musco Case Brief
Concerning Agro Sevilla,’’ dated July 8, 2022; and
‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 3rd Administrative
Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Camacho,’’
dated July 8, 2022; see also Agro Sevilla’s Letter,
‘‘Case Brief of Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop
Andalusia and its Affiliated Importer, Agro Sevilla
USA Ripe Olives From Spain (POR3: 08/01/2020–
07/31/2021),’’ dated July 8, 2022; Camacho’s Letter,
‘‘Camacho’s Letter in Lieu of Case Brief Ripe Olives
From Spain (08/01/2020–07/31/2021),’’ dated July
8, 2022.
4 See Agro Sevilla’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Agro
Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop Andalusia and its
Affiliated Importer, Agro Sevilla USA Ripe Olives
From Spain (POR3: 08/01/2020–07/31/2021),’’
dated July 15, 2022; see also Camacho’s Letter,
‘‘Camacho’s Rebuttal Brief Ripe Olives From Spain
(POR3: 08/01/2020–07/31/2021),’’ dated July 15,
2022.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020–
2021,’’ dated September 12, 2022.
6 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty
Order, 83 FR 37465 (August 1, 2018) (Order); see
also Ripe Olives from Spain: Notice of Correction
to Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 39691 (August
10, 2018) (Order).
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Ripe Olives from
Spain; 2020–2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
75590
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2022 / Notices
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We made no changes to our
calculations for the final results of
review.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We preliminary found that Dcoop had
no shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.8 No party commented
on the Preliminary Results regarding the
no-shipments decision with respect to
Dcoop. Therefore, for the final results,
we continue to find that Dcoop had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR and will issue
appropriate instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
based on the final results.
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to the
parties in a proceeding the calculations
performed in connection with final
results of review within five days after
public announcement of final results.11
However, because Commerce made no
adjustments to the margin calculation
methodology used in the Preliminary
Results, there are no calculations to
disclose for the final results of review.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce
will determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in
accordance with the final results of this
review. Because the weighted-average
Rate for Non-Examined Companies
dumping margins for Agro Sevilla and
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce Camacho are not zero or de minimis
calculated weighted-average dumping
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final
margins for the mandatory respondents, results of this review, we calculated an
Agro Sevilla and Camacho, that are not
importer-specific assessment rate based
zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the ratio of the total amount of
on the basis of facts available.9 No party dumping calculated for each importer’s
commented on the Preliminary Results
examined sales and the total entered
regarding the rates assigned to nonvalue of those same sales in accordance
examined respondents and we have
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).12 The final
made no changes to the margin
results of this administrative review
calculations for the mandatory
shall be the basis for the assessment of
respondents. Therefore, in accordance
antidumping duties on entries of
with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act,
merchandise covered by the final results
Commerce assigned to the companies
of this review and for future deposits of
not individually examined, listed in the estimated duties, where applicable.13
chart below, a margin of 2.87 percent
For entries of subject merchandise
which is the weighted-average of Agro
during the POR produced by either of
Sevilla’s and Camacho’s calculated
the individually examined respondents
for which they did not know that the
weighted-average dumping margins for
merchandise was destined for the
these final results.10
United States, we will instruct CBP to
Final Results of Review
liquidate these entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the
Commerce determines that the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
following weighted-average dumping
the transaction.14 For the companies
margins exist for the period August 1,
identified above that were not selected
2020, through July 31, 2021:
for individual examination, we will
Weighted- instruct CBP to liquidate entries at the
average
rates established after the completion of
Producer or exporter
dumping
the final results of review.
margin
Because we have determined that
(percent)
Dcoop had no shipments of subject
merchandise in this review, Commerce
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas, S. Coop.
And ..........................................
1.84 will instruct CBP to liquidate any
Angel Camacho Alimentacion,
suspended entries that entered under
S.L ...........................................
4.56 Dcoop’s case number (i.e., at Dcoop’s
Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L.U ...
Aceitunas Torrent, S.L ................
2.87
2.87
11 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
these final results, Commerce applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
13 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
14 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
12 In
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
8 See
Preliminary Results, 87 FR at 34842.
9 Id.
10 For more information regarding the calculation
of this margin, see Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives
from Spain: Calculation of the Preliminary Margin
for Respondents Not Selected for Individual
Examination,’’ dated June 3, 2022. As the weighting
factor, we relied on the publicly ranged sales data
reported in the quantity and value charts submitted
by Agro Sevilla and Camacho.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Dec 08, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cash deposit rate) at the all-others rate
(i.e., 19.98 percent).
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
Upon publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, the following cash
deposit requirements will be effective
for all shipments of ripe olives from
Spain entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) the cash
deposit rate for companies subject to
this review will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margins
established in the final results of the
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
companies not covered in this review
but covered in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published in the completed segment for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation
but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established
in the completed segment for the most
recent period for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 19.98 percent,15 the
all-others rate established in the LTFV
investigation. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties, and/or an increase
15 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 83
FR 28193 (June 18, 2018).
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2022 / Notices
in the amount of antidumping duties by
the amount of the countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing
this notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 5, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether to Reject Agro
Sevilla’s Revisions and Corrections to
Sales and Cost Data as Untimely and
Unsolicited and Apply Partial Adverse
Facts Available (AFA) to Unreported
U.S. Sales
Comment 2: Agro Sevilla’s Verification
Corrections
Comment 3: Camacho’s Adjustment to Cost
for Purchase of Certain Sales
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022–26782 Filed 12–8–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–423–812]
Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-toLength Plate From Belgium: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2020–2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that Industeel
Belgium S.A. (Industeel) made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value during the period of review (POR),
May 1, 2020, through April 30, 2021.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Dec 08, 2022
Jkt 259001
Applicable December 9, 2022.
Alex
Wood or Ann Marie Caton, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1959 and (202) 482–2607,
respectively.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 6, 2022, Commerce published
the Preliminary Results.1 On August 1,
2022, we extended the deadline for the
final results until December 2, 2022.2
On October 6, 2022, we released the
final verification report and invited
parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results.3 Also in October 2022, we
received a case brief from Nucor
Corporation (the petitioner) and a
rebuttal brief from Industeel.4 For a
description of the events that occurred
since the Preliminary Results, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.5
Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
certain carbon and alloy steel hot-rolled
or forged flat plate products not in coils,
whether or not painted, varnished, or
coated with plastics or other
nonmetallic substances from Belgium.
Products subject to the order are
currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule on the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers:
7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060,
7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045,
7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000,
7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030,
7211.14.0045, 7225.40.1110,
1 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-toLength Plate from Belgium: Preliminary Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 87 FR 34244
(June 6, 2022) (Preliminary Results).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of 2020–2021 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,’’ dated August 1, 2022.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of Industeel
Belgium S.A.,’’ dated October 4, 2022; see also
Memorandum, ‘‘Briefing Schedule for the Final
Results,’’ dated October 6, 2022.
4 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Nucor’s Case Brief,’’
dated October 13, 2022; see also Industeel’s Letter,
‘‘Industeel’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated October 24,
2022.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2020–
2021 Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel CutTo-Length Plate from Belgium,’’ dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75591
7225.40.1180, 7225.40.3005,
7225.40.3050, 7226.20.0000, and
7226.91.5000. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to this scope is dispositive.6
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs are listed in the appendix
to this notice and addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding our Preliminary
Results, we made certain changes to the
preliminary weighted-average margin
calculations for Industeel.7
Final Results of the Review
We are assigning the following
weighted-average dumping margin to
Industeel for the period May 1, 2020,
through April 30, 2021:
Producers/exporters
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Industeel Belgium S.A ................
1.14
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the
calculations performed in connection
with these final results of review to
parties in this review within five days
after public announcement of the final
results or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
6 For a full description of the scope of the order,
see Issues and Decision Memorandum.
7 See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 236 (Friday, December 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75589-75591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26782]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-469-817]
Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020-
2021
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers or exporters subject to this administrative review made sales
of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of
review (POR), August 1, 2020, through July 31, 2021. We further
determine that Alimentary Group Dcoop S. Coop. And. (Dcoop) had no
shipments during the POR.
DATES: Applicable December 9, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Claudia Cott, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3683 or (202) 482-4270,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 8, 2022, Commerce published the preliminary results of the
2020-2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on ripe
olives from Spain.\1\ This administrative review covers five producers
or exporters of the subject merchandise, including the two mandatory
respondents, Agro Sevilla Aceitunas, S. Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), and
Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L. (Camacho). We invited interested
parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.\2\ On July 8, 2022, we
received case briefs from the domestic interested party, Musco Family
Olive Company (Musco), and from the mandatory respondents, Agro Sevilla
and Camacho.\3\ On July 15, 2022, Agro Sevilla and Camacho submitted
rebuttal briefs.\4\ On September 12, 2022, Commerce extended the
deadline for the final results by 60 days to December 5, 2022.\5\
Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination
of No Shipments; 2020-2021, 87 FR 34841 (June 8, 2022) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Preliminary Results, 87 FR at 34842.
\3\ See Musco's Letters, ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 3rd
Administrative Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Agro Sevilla,''
dated July 8, 2022; and ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 3rd Administrative
Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Camacho,'' dated July 8, 2022;
see also Agro Sevilla's Letter, ``Case Brief of Agro Sevilla
Aceitunas S.Coop Andalusia and its Affiliated Importer, Agro Sevilla
USA Ripe Olives From Spain (POR3: 08/01/2020-07/31/2021),'' dated
July 8, 2022; Camacho's Letter, ``Camacho's Letter in Lieu of Case
Brief Ripe Olives From Spain (08/01/2020-07/31/2021),'' dated July
8, 2022.
\4\ See Agro Sevilla's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief of Agro Sevilla
Aceitunas S.Coop Andalusia and its Affiliated Importer, Agro Sevilla
USA Ripe Olives From Spain (POR3: 08/01/2020-07/31/2021),'' dated
July 15, 2022; see also Camacho's Letter, ``Camacho's Rebuttal Brief
Ripe Olives From Spain (POR3: 08/01/2020-07/31/2021),'' dated July
15, 2022.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Extension of
Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2020-2021,'' dated September 12, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 6
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR
37465 (August 1, 2018) (Order); see also Ripe Olives from Spain:
Notice of Correction to Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 39691 (August
10, 2018) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the Order are ripe olives from Spain. For a
full description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Ripe Olives
from Spain; 2020-2021,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted
by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were
submitted by parties in this administrative review are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum and are listed in the appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
[[Page 75590]]
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We made no changes to our calculations for the final results of
review.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We preliminary found that Dcoop had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR.\8\ No party commented on the Preliminary
Results regarding the no-shipments decision with respect to Dcoop.
Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that Dcoop had no
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR and will issue
appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
based on the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Preliminary Results, 87 FR at 34842.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Non-Examined Companies
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce calculated weighted-average
dumping margins for the mandatory respondents, Agro Sevilla and
Camacho, that are not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the
basis of facts available.\9\ No party commented on the Preliminary
Results regarding the rates assigned to non-examined respondents and we
have made no changes to the margin calculations for the mandatory
respondents. Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the
Act, Commerce assigned to the companies not individually examined,
listed in the chart below, a margin of 2.87 percent which is the
weighted-average of Agro Sevilla's and Camacho's calculated weighted-
average dumping margins for these final results.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Id.
\10\ For more information regarding the calculation of this
margin, see Memorandum, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Calculation of the
Preliminary Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual
Examination,'' dated June 3, 2022. As the weighting factor, we
relied on the publicly ranged sales data reported in the quantity
and value charts submitted by Agro Sevilla and Camacho.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period August 1, 2020, through July 31, 2021:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer or exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas, S. Coop. And........................ 1.84
Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L............................. 4.56
Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L.U............................... 2.87
Aceitunas Torrent, S.L...................................... 2.87
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to the parties in a proceeding the
calculations performed in connection with final results of review
within five days after public announcement of final results.\11\
However, because Commerce made no adjustments to the margin calculation
methodology used in the Preliminary Results, there are no calculations
to disclose for the final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. Because the weighted-average dumping
margins for Agro Sevilla and Camacho are not zero or de minimis (i.e.,
less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we
calculated an importer-specific assessment rate based on the ratio of
the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's examined
sales and the total entered value of those same sales in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\12\ The final results of this administrative
review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and
for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment
rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings:
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment
Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77
FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
\13\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by
either of the individually examined respondents for which they did not
know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate these entries at the all-others rate if there
is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the
transaction.\14\ For the companies identified above that were not
selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
entries at the rates established after the completion of the final
results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because we have determined that Dcoop had no shipments of subject
merchandise in this review, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate any
suspended entries that entered under Dcoop's case number (i.e., at
Dcoop's cash deposit rate) at the all-others rate (i.e., 19.98
percent).
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
Upon publication of this notice in the Federal Register, the
following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments
of ripe olives from Spain entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for companies subject
to this review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margins
established in the final results of the review; (2) for merchandise
exported by companies not covered in this review but covered in a prior
segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published in the completed segment for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established in the completed segment for the most recent
period for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 19.98
percent,\15\ the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Final Affirmative Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 83 FR 28193 (June 18, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an
increase
[[Page 75591]]
in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the countervailing
duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject
to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 5, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether to Reject Agro Sevilla's Revisions and
Corrections to Sales and Cost Data as Untimely and Unsolicited and
Apply Partial Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Unreported U.S. Sales
Comment 2: Agro Sevilla's Verification Corrections
Comment 3: Camacho's Adjustment to Cost for Purchase of Certain
Sales
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022-26782 Filed 12-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P