Certain Video Processing Devices and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation, 73329 [2022-25985]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1341]
Certain Video Processing Devices and
Products Containing the Same; Notice
of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
October 19, 2022, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of VideoLabs, Inc. of Palo Alto,
California. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain video processing devices and
products containing the same by reason
of the infringement of certain claims of
U.S. Patent No. 7,769,238 (‘‘the ’238
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,139,878 (‘‘the
’878 Patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
8,208,542 (‘‘the ’542 Patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute. The complainant requests that
the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the
investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Mullan, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2022).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
November 18, 2022, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claim 1
of the ’238 patent; claims 1–4 of the ’878
patent; and claims 1 and 2 of the ’542
patent and, whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘desktop computers
and laptop computers’’;
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
VideoLabs, Inc., 2303 Saint Francis
Drive, Palo Alto, California 94303
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto,
California 94304
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as
amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19,
2020), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the
date of service by the complainant of the
complaint and the notice of
investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73329
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 18, 2022.
Jessica Mullan,
Acting Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2022–25985 Filed 11–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1344]
Certain Bio-Layer Interferometers and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Institution of Investigation
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
October 25, 2022, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Sartorius Bioanalytical
Instruments, Inc. of Bohemia, New
York. A supplement to the complaint
was filed on November 14, 2022. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain bio-layer interferometers and
components thereof by reason of the
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 7,394,547 (‘‘the ’547 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 7,445,887 (‘‘the ’887
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,728,982 (‘‘the
’982 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
8,305,585 (‘‘the ’585 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute. The complainant requests that
the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 73329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25985]
[[Page 73329]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1341]
Certain Video Processing Devices and Products Containing the
Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on October 19, 2022, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of VideoLabs, Inc.
of Palo Alto, California. The complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain video processing devices and products containing the same by
reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
7,769,238 (``the '238 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,139,878 (``the '878
Patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,208,542 (``the '542 Patent''). The
complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists
as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests
that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the
investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Mullan, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-
1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2022).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on November 18, 2022, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of
claim 1 of the '238 patent; claims 1-4 of the '878 patent; and claims 1
and 2 of the '542 patent and, whether an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``desktop computers
and laptop computers'';
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
VideoLabs, Inc., 2303 Saint Francis Drive, Palo Alto, California 94303
(b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is
to be served:
HP Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as
a party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the
complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation.
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor
is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 18, 2022.
Jessica Mullan,
Acting Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2022-25985 Filed 11-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P