Study on Non-Fungible Tokens and Related Intellectual Property Law Issues, 71584-71586 [2022-25211]
Download as PDF
71584
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2022 / Notices
check the agenda on the OEAB website
to confirm the public comment period
schedule.
The OEAB expects that public
statements at its meetings will not be
repetitive of previously submitted
verbal or written statements. In general,
each individual or group making a
verbal presentation will be limited to
three minutes. The Designated Federal
Officer must receive written comments
by November 27, 2022, to provide
sufficient time for OEAB review.
Written comments received after
November 27, 2022, will be distributed
to the OEAB but may not be reviewed
prior to the meeting date. Comments
should be submitted to Designated
Federal Officer david.turner@noaa.gov.
Special Accomodations: Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to the
Designated Federal Officer by November
22, 2022.
David Holst,
Chief Financial and Administrative Officer,
Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022–25530 Filed 11–22–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–KA–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
United States Copyright Office
[Docket No.: PTO–C–2022–0035]
Study on Non-Fungible Tokens and
Related Intellectual Property Law
Issues
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Department of
Commerce; United States Copyright
Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry; notice of
public roundtables.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) and the
United States Copyright Office (USCO)
(collectively, the Offices) are conducting
a joint study regarding issues of
intellectual property (IP) law and policy
associated with non-fungible tokens
(NFTs). The Offices seek public
comments on these matters to assist in
their work on IP policy related to NFTs
and in conducting the study. In
addition, the Offices are announcing a
series of three public roundtables to
allow them to gather further input.
DATES:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Nov 22, 2022
Jkt 259001
Written comments: Public comments
must be received no later than 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time on January 9, 2023.
Public roundtables: Roundtable 1:
Patents and NFTs. Roundtable 1 will be
held on Tuesday, January 10, 2023.
Requests to participate as a panelist
must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on December 21, 2022.
Roundtable 2: Trademarks and NFTs.
Roundtable 2 will be held on Thursday,
January 12, 2023. Requests to participate
as a panelist must be received by 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time on December 21,
2022.
Roundtable 3: Copyright and NFTs.
Roundtable 3 will be held on
Wednesday, January 18, 2023. Requests
to participate as a panelist must be
received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
December 21, 2022.
ADDRESSES:
Submission of written comments: For
reasons of Government efficiency,
comments must be submitted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. To submit
comments via the portal, enter docket
number PTO–C–2022–0035 on the
homepage and click ‘‘Search.’’ The site
will provide a search results page listing
all documents associated with this
docket. Find a reference to this request
for information and click on the
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in ADOBE®
portable document format (PDF) or
MICROSOFT WORD® format. Because
comments will be made available for
public inspection, information that the
submitter does not desire to make
public, such as an address or phone
number, should not be included. Visit
the Federal eRulemaking Portal for
additional instructions on providing
comments via the portal. If electronic
submission of comments is not feasible
due to a lack of access to a computer
and/or the internet, please contact the
Offices using the contact information
below for special instructions on how to
submit comments by other means.
Submission of business confidential
information: Any submissions
containing business confidential
information must be marked
‘‘confidential treatment requested’’ and
submitted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Submitters should
provide an index listing the
document(s) or information they would
like the Offices to withhold. The index
should identify the confidential
document(s) by document number(s)
and document title(s) and should
identify the confidential information by
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
description(s) and relevant page
number(s) and/or section number(s)
within a document. Submitters should
provide a statement explaining their
grounds for requesting non-disclosure of
the information to the public as well.
The Offices also request that submitters
of business confidential information
include a non-confidential version
(either redacted or summarized) that
will be posted on www.regulations.gov
and available for public viewing. In the
event that the submitter cannot provide
a non-confidential version of their
submission, the Offices request that the
submitter post a notice in the docket
stating that they have provided the
Offices with business confidential
information. Should a submitter fail
either to docket a non-confidential
version of their submission or to post a
notice that they have provided business
confidential information, the Offices
will note the receipt of the submission
on the docket with the submitter’s
organization or name (to the degree
permitted by law) and the date of
submission.
Anonymous submissions: The Offices
will accept anonymous submissions.
Enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous.
Public roundtables: The roundtables
will be conducted virtually. Roundtable
1 (patents) and Roundtable 2
(trademarks) will be conducted using
the Webex videoconferencing platform.
Roundtable 3 (copyright) will be
conducted using the Zoom
videoconferencing platform. Requests to
participate as a panelist at one or more
of these roundtables must be submitted
via email to
NFTStudySpeakingRequests@uspto.gov
and must be received by the dates listed
above (at DATES). Requests to participate
as a panelist at a roundtable made in
any other form, including as part of
comments submitted via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, will not be
considered. If email submission of
requests to participate as a panelist is
not feasible, please contact the Offices
using the contact information below for
special instructions. The submission of
written comments in response to this
notice is not a prerequisite to
participation as a panelist in a
roundtable. Please note that the Offices
will review all requests to participate
and will endeavor to invite participants
representing diverse viewpoints on the
subject matter discussed at each
roundtable. The Offices may not be able
to accommodate all requests.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin R. Amer, Senior Level Attorney,
USPTO, kevin.amer@uspto.gov, 571–
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2022 / Notices
272–9300; Branden Ritchie, Senior
Level Attorney, USPTO,
branden.ritchie@uspto.gov, 571–272–
9300; Andrew Foglia, Senior Counsel,
USCO, afoglia@copyright.gov, 202–707–
8350; or Jene´e Iyer, Counsel, USCO,
jiyer@copyright.gov, 202–707–8350.
The
USPTO and the USCO have been
consulting with stakeholders and
working on both U.S. and international
policy relating to emerging technologies,
such as NFTs. These efforts have been
collaborative, and each office also
engages in its own activities impacting
its respective responsibilities. For
example, USPTO’s work in this area is
being done as part of the USPTO’s AI
and Emerging Technology Partnership,
see https://www.uspto.gov/initiatives/
artificial-intelligence/ai-and-emergingtechnology-partnership-engagementand-events, and as part of separate
consultations and collaborations. The
USCO continues to examine copyright
issues arising from emerging
technologies such as NFTs, softwareenabled devices, and artificial
intelligence. On June 9, 2022, Senators
Patrick Leahy and Thom Tillis sent a
letter to the USPTO and the USCO
requesting that the Offices conduct a
joint study addressing various IP law
and policy issues associated with NFTs.
The letter urged the Offices to ‘‘consult
with the private sector, drawing from
the technological, creative, and
academic sectors.’’ USPTO and USCO
responded on July 8, 2022, stating that
‘‘we will indeed conduct the study.’’
The Senators’ letter, and the agencies’
response, is at https://
www.copyright.gov/laws/hearings/
response-to-june-9-2022-letter.pdf.
In furtherance of the study and
consultations, the Offices request public
comments on the questions provided
below. Commenters need not respond to
every question and may provide
comments that are relevant to the
subject matter of this study but that are
not encompassed by the questions.
Following the close of the public
comment period, the Offices will hold a
series of three public roundtables to
allow members of the public to provide
further input.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
I. Topics for Public Comment
Note Regarding the Use of the Term
‘‘NFT’’: Merriam-Webster defines ‘‘nonfungible token’’ and ‘‘NFT’’ as ‘‘a unique
digital identifier that cannot be copied,
substituted, or subdivided, that is
recorded in a blockchain, and that is
used to certify authenticity and
ownership (as of a specific digital asset
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Nov 22, 2022
Jkt 259001
and specific rights relating to it).’’ 1 The
terms ‘‘NFT’’ and ‘‘NFTs’’ in the
questions below should be read
consistently with this general definition.
Accordingly, for purposes of the
questions below, the terms ‘‘NFT’’ and
‘‘NFTs’’ do not refer to the underlying
asset,2 but rather to the unique
identifier.
To the extent that your responses
contemplate a definition different from
the Merriam-Webster definition, please
provide your definition before
answering the questions, and explain
how it is relevant to your answers.
Questions for Public Comment: The
Offices welcome comments from
members of the public on any issues
relevant to the subject matter of this
study, and are particularly interested in
answers to the following questions. To
the extent practicable, in your written
response, please identify which
questions you are answering.
1. Please describe:
a. The current uses of NFTs in your
field or industry, including the types of
assets associated with NFTs (e.g., digital
assets, physical goods, services); and
b. Potential future applications of
NFTs in your field or industry,
including the types of assets that could
be associated with NFTs (e.g., digital
assets, physical goods, services).
2. Please describe any IP-related
challenges or opportunities associated
with NFTs or NFT markets.
3. Please describe how NFT markets
affect the production of materials
subject to IP protection.
4. Please describe whether, how, and
to what extent NFTs are used by or
could be used by IP rights holders
(including those who hold trademarks,
patents, and/or copyrights) to:
a. Document the authenticity of an
asset;
b. Document the seller’s ownership of
or authority to sell an asset;
c. Document the seller’s authority to
transfer any relevant or necessary IP
rights associated with an asset; and
d. Document any limitations related
to IP rights surrounding the sale, or the
purchaser’s use, of an asset.
5. Please describe whether, how, and
to what extent NFTs present challenges
for IP rights holders, or those who sell
assets using NFTs, with respect to the
activities described in Question 4 above.
6. Please describe whether, how, and
to what extent NFTs are used by, could
be used by, or present challenges or
1 Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). NFT. MerriamWebster.com dictionary, available at www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/NFT.
2 The Offices here use the word ‘‘asset’’ broadly
and take no position on its meaning in the context
of NFTs in other bodies of law.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71585
opportunities for IP rights holders
(including those who hold trademarks,
patents, and/or copyrights) to:
a. Obtain their IP rights;
b. Transfer or license their IP rights;
c. Exercise overall control and
management of their IP rights (e.g.,
digital rights management tools,
mechanisms to facilitate the payment of
royalties, etc.); and
d. Enforce their IP rights, including
any mechanisms that could mitigate
infringement or help ensure compliance
with contractual terms associated with
the sale of an asset.
7. Please describe how and to what
extent copyrights, trademarks, and
patents are relied on, or anticipated to
be relied on, in your field or industry to:
a. Protect assets that are associated
with NFTs;
b. Combat infringement associated
with NFT-related assets offered by third
parties; and
c. Ensure the availability of
appropriate reuse of NFT-related assets.
8. Are current IP laws adequate to
address the protection and enforcement
of IP in the context of NFTs? If not,
please explain why, including any gaps
in current IP laws, and describe any
legislation you believe should be
considered to address these issues.
9. Please describe any IP-related
impacts those in your field or industry
have experienced in connection with
actual or intended uses of NFTs. When
relevant, please describe any legal
disputes that have arisen in the
following contexts, and the outcome of
such disputes, including citations to any
relevant judicial proceedings:
a. The relationship between the
transfer of an NFT and the ownership of
IP rights in the associated asset;
b. The licensing of IP rights in the
asset associated with an NFT;
c. Infringement claims when either (i)
an NFT is associated with an asset in
which another party holds IP rights, or
(ii) IP rights in the asset associated with
an NFT are owned by the NFT creator;
d. The type and/or scope of IP
protection afforded to the NFT creator,
including when that party is not the
creator of the associated asset; and
e. The application of one or more of
the exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. 106
to transactions involving NFTs.
10. Please describe any instances you
have observed in which a party has sent
or received:
a. A notification of claimed copyright
infringement, counternotice or material
misrepresentation, pursuant to 17 U.S.C.
512, in connection with an NFT; and
b. Other IP-related legal claims
seeking the removal or reinstatement of
NFT-associated materials.
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
71586
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2022 / Notices
For each such instance, please
describe the nature and outcome of this
claim or process, including whether the
material was ultimately removed, and if
so, whether the material subsequently
reappeared. If an infringement or 17
U.S.C. 512(f) action was filed, please
provide citations to the court docket and
any relevant judicial decisions.
11. Please describe the extent to
which adjustments are being made to IP
portfolio planning and management in
light of the emergence of NFTs.
12. Please describe any experiences in
seeking IP protection for, or use of,
assets associated with NFTs in foreign
jurisdictions.
13. Please identify any additional IP
issues associated with NFTs that you
believe the Offices should consider in
conducting this study.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
II. Public Roundtables
The Offices will hold three public
roundtables focused, respectively, on
copyrights, patents, and trademarks.
The roundtables are not expected to
address broad topics in cryptocurrency
or decentralized systems generally, but
rather only IP considerations as they
relate to NFTs.
Members of the public interested in
participating as a panelist in one or
more roundtables must submit such a
request to NFTStudySpeakingRequests@
uspto.gov and provide their name,
professional affiliation, and contact
information, and designate the
roundtable(s) at which they wish to
speak. Such requests must be submitted
by the dates listed above (at DATES).
Please note that written comments
should not be submitted to this address;
any such comments will not be
considered.
The Offices will make every effort to
ensure a broad range of stakeholder
views are represented on the panels but
may not be able to accommodate every
request to participate. The Offices may
also invite participation from
individuals and entities who have not
requested to participate. The submission
of written comments in response to this
notice is not a prerequisite to
participation as a panelist in a
roundtable.
The Offices will contact individuals
selected to participate as panelists at the
roundtables for additional information
to aid in preparing for the roundtables.
A tentative agenda for each roundtable
will be posted at https://www.uspto.gov/
ip-policy/joint-study-intellectualproperty-rights-and-non-fungible-tokens
and https://copyright.gov/policy/nftstudy approximately one week before it
takes place.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Nov 22, 2022
Jkt 259001
The roundtables will be livestreamed,
and the Offices will post a link and
instructions for members of the public
to register to view them live. The
USPTO will host Roundtable 1 (patents)
and Roundtable 2 (trademarks).
Additional information regarding these
roundtables and instructions for
registering to view them will be posted
at https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/
joint-study-intellectual-property-rightsand-non-fungible-tokens. The USCO
will host Roundtable 3 (copyrights).
Additional information regarding this
roundtable and instructions for
registering to view it will be posted at
https://copyright.gov/policy/nft-study.
The roundtables will also be videorecorded and transcribed, and copies of
the recordings and transcripts will be
available on the above USPTO and
USCO websites.
Katherine K. Vidal,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
Dated: November 9, 2022.
Shira Perlmutter,
Register of Copyrights and Director, United
States Copyright Office.
[FR Doc. 2022–25211 Filed 11–22–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P; 1410–30–P
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
[Docket No. CFPB–2022–0078]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau (Bureau or CFPB) is
requesting the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB’s) approval of a new
information collection titled ‘‘Generic
Information Collection Plan for
Foundational Research about Consumer
Credit Markets and Household Financial
Decision-Making.’’
DATES: Written comments are
encouraged and must be received on or
before January 23, 2023 to be assured of
consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the title of the information
collection, OMB Control Number (see
below), and docket number (see above),
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Email: PRA_Comments@cfpb.gov.
Include Docket No. CFPB–2022–0078 in
the subject line of the email.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Comment Intake, Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau (Attention: PRA
Office), 1700 G Street NW, Washington,
DC 20552. Because paper mail in the
Washington, DC area and at the Bureau
is subject to delay, commenters are
encouraged to submit comments
electronically.
Please note that comments submitted
after the comment period will not be
accepted. In general, all comments
received will become public records,
including any personal information
provided. Sensitive personal
information, such as account numbers
or Social Security numbers, should not
be included.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Documentation prepared in support of
this information collection request is
available at www.regulations.gov.
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Anthony May,
PRA Officer, at (202) 435–7278, or
email: CFPB_PRA@cfpb.gov. If you
require this document in an alternative
electronic format, please contact CFPB_
Accessibility@cfpb.gov. Please do not
submit comments to these email boxes.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Generic
Information Collection Plan for
Foundational Research about Consumer
Credit Markets and Household Financial
Decision-Making.
OMB Control Number: 3170–00XX.
Type of Review: New collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; private sector: businesses
or other for-profits; not-for-profits
institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
48,000.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 24,000.
Abstract: Under the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act, the Bureau is tasked with
researching, analyzing, and reporting on
topics relating to the Bureau’s mission,
including developments in markets for
consumer financial products and
services, consumer awareness, and
consumer behavior. Under this generic
information collection plan, the Bureau
collects data through qualitative and
quantitative methods, including focus
groups, interviews, and controlled trials
in field and laboratory settings. The
primary purpose of research carried out
under this generic clearance is for
foundational research of an exploratory
nature. This foundational research will
be used for developmental and
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71584-71586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25211]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
United States Copyright Office
[Docket No.: PTO-C-2022-0035]
Study on Non-Fungible Tokens and Related Intellectual Property
Law Issues
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of
Commerce; United States Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry; notice of public roundtables.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the
United States Copyright Office (USCO) (collectively, the Offices) are
conducting a joint study regarding issues of intellectual property (IP)
law and policy associated with non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The Offices
seek public comments on these matters to assist in their work on IP
policy related to NFTs and in conducting the study. In addition, the
Offices are announcing a series of three public roundtables to allow
them to gather further input.
DATES:
Written comments: Public comments must be received no later than
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 9, 2023.
Public roundtables: Roundtable 1: Patents and NFTs. Roundtable 1
will be held on Tuesday, January 10, 2023. Requests to participate as a
panelist must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 21,
2022.
Roundtable 2: Trademarks and NFTs. Roundtable 2 will be held on
Thursday, January 12, 2023. Requests to participate as a panelist must
be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 21, 2022.
Roundtable 3: Copyright and NFTs. Roundtable 3 will be held on
Wednesday, January 18, 2023. Requests to participate as a panelist must
be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 21, 2022.
ADDRESSES:
Submission of written comments: For reasons of Government
efficiency, comments must be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at www.regulations.gov. To submit comments via the portal, enter
docket number PTO-C-2022-0035 on the homepage and click ``Search.'' The
site will provide a search results page listing all documents
associated with this docket. Find a reference to this request for
information and click on the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your comments. Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in ADOBE[supreg] portable document
format (PDF) or MICROSOFT WORD[supreg] format. Because comments will be
made available for public inspection, information that the submitter
does not desire to make public, such as an address or phone number,
should not be included. Visit the Federal eRulemaking Portal for
additional instructions on providing comments via the portal. If
electronic submission of comments is not feasible due to a lack of
access to a computer and/or the internet, please contact the Offices
using the contact information below for special instructions on how to
submit comments by other means.
Submission of business confidential information: Any submissions
containing business confidential information must be marked
``confidential treatment requested'' and submitted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Submitters should provide an index listing the
document(s) or information they would like the Offices to withhold. The
index should identify the confidential document(s) by document
number(s) and document title(s) and should identify the confidential
information by description(s) and relevant page number(s) and/or
section number(s) within a document. Submitters should provide a
statement explaining their grounds for requesting non-disclosure of the
information to the public as well. The Offices also request that
submitters of business confidential information include a non-
confidential version (either redacted or summarized) that will be
posted on www.regulations.gov and available for public viewing. In the
event that the submitter cannot provide a non-confidential version of
their submission, the Offices request that the submitter post a notice
in the docket stating that they have provided the Offices with business
confidential information. Should a submitter fail either to docket a
non-confidential version of their submission or to post a notice that
they have provided business confidential information, the Offices will
note the receipt of the submission on the docket with the submitter's
organization or name (to the degree permitted by law) and the date of
submission.
Anonymous submissions: The Offices will accept anonymous
submissions. Enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous.
Public roundtables: The roundtables will be conducted virtually.
Roundtable 1 (patents) and Roundtable 2 (trademarks) will be conducted
using the Webex videoconferencing platform. Roundtable 3 (copyright)
will be conducted using the Zoom videoconferencing platform. Requests
to participate as a panelist at one or more of these roundtables must
be submitted via email to [email protected] and must
be received by the dates listed above (at DATES). Requests to
participate as a panelist at a roundtable made in any other form,
including as part of comments submitted via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal, will not be considered. If email submission of requests to
participate as a panelist is not feasible, please contact the Offices
using the contact information below for special instructions. The
submission of written comments in response to this notice is not a
prerequisite to participation as a panelist in a roundtable. Please
note that the Offices will review all requests to participate and will
endeavor to invite participants representing diverse viewpoints on the
subject matter discussed at each roundtable. The Offices may not be
able to accommodate all requests.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin R. Amer, Senior Level Attorney,
USPTO, [email protected], 571-
[[Page 71585]]
272-9300; Branden Ritchie, Senior Level Attorney, USPTO,
[email protected], 571-272-9300; Andrew Foglia, Senior Counsel,
USCO, [email protected], 202-707-8350; or Jen[eacute]e Iyer,
Counsel, USCO, [email protected], 202-707-8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The USPTO and the USCO have been consulting
with stakeholders and working on both U.S. and international policy
relating to emerging technologies, such as NFTs. These efforts have
been collaborative, and each office also engages in its own activities
impacting its respective responsibilities. For example, USPTO's work in
this area is being done as part of the USPTO's AI and Emerging
Technology Partnership, see https://www.uspto.gov/initiatives/artificial-intelligence/ai-and-emerging-technology-partnership-engagement-and-events, and as part of separate consultations and
collaborations. The USCO continues to examine copyright issues arising
from emerging technologies such as NFTs, software-enabled devices, and
artificial intelligence. On June 9, 2022, Senators Patrick Leahy and
Thom Tillis sent a letter to the USPTO and the USCO requesting that the
Offices conduct a joint study addressing various IP law and policy
issues associated with NFTs. The letter urged the Offices to ``consult
with the private sector, drawing from the technological, creative, and
academic sectors.'' USPTO and USCO responded on July 8, 2022, stating
that ``we will indeed conduct the study.'' The Senators' letter, and
the agencies' response, is at https://www.copyright.gov/laws/hearings/response-to-june-9-2022-letter.pdf.
In furtherance of the study and consultations, the Offices request
public comments on the questions provided below. Commenters need not
respond to every question and may provide comments that are relevant to
the subject matter of this study but that are not encompassed by the
questions. Following the close of the public comment period, the
Offices will hold a series of three public roundtables to allow members
of the public to provide further input.
I. Topics for Public Comment
Note Regarding the Use of the Term ``NFT'': Merriam-Webster defines
``non-fungible token'' and ``NFT'' as ``a unique digital identifier
that cannot be copied, substituted, or subdivided, that is recorded in
a blockchain, and that is used to certify authenticity and ownership
(as of a specific digital asset and specific rights relating to it).''
\1\ The terms ``NFT'' and ``NFTs'' in the questions below should be
read consistently with this general definition. Accordingly, for
purposes of the questions below, the terms ``NFT'' and ``NFTs'' do not
refer to the underlying asset,\2\ but rather to the unique identifier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). NFT. Merriam-Webster.com
dictionary, available at www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/NFT.
\2\ The Offices here use the word ``asset'' broadly and take no
position on its meaning in the context of NFTs in other bodies of
law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent that your responses contemplate a definition
different from the Merriam-Webster definition, please provide your
definition before answering the questions, and explain how it is
relevant to your answers.
Questions for Public Comment: The Offices welcome comments from
members of the public on any issues relevant to the subject matter of
this study, and are particularly interested in answers to the following
questions. To the extent practicable, in your written response, please
identify which questions you are answering.
1. Please describe:
a. The current uses of NFTs in your field or industry, including
the types of assets associated with NFTs (e.g., digital assets,
physical goods, services); and
b. Potential future applications of NFTs in your field or industry,
including the types of assets that could be associated with NFTs (e.g.,
digital assets, physical goods, services).
2. Please describe any IP-related challenges or opportunities
associated with NFTs or NFT markets.
3. Please describe how NFT markets affect the production of
materials subject to IP protection.
4. Please describe whether, how, and to what extent NFTs are used
by or could be used by IP rights holders (including those who hold
trademarks, patents, and/or copyrights) to:
a. Document the authenticity of an asset;
b. Document the seller's ownership of or authority to sell an
asset;
c. Document the seller's authority to transfer any relevant or
necessary IP rights associated with an asset; and
d. Document any limitations related to IP rights surrounding the
sale, or the purchaser's use, of an asset.
5. Please describe whether, how, and to what extent NFTs present
challenges for IP rights holders, or those who sell assets using NFTs,
with respect to the activities described in Question 4 above.
6. Please describe whether, how, and to what extent NFTs are used
by, could be used by, or present challenges or opportunities for IP
rights holders (including those who hold trademarks, patents, and/or
copyrights) to:
a. Obtain their IP rights;
b. Transfer or license their IP rights;
c. Exercise overall control and management of their IP rights
(e.g., digital rights management tools, mechanisms to facilitate the
payment of royalties, etc.); and
d. Enforce their IP rights, including any mechanisms that could
mitigate infringement or help ensure compliance with contractual terms
associated with the sale of an asset.
7. Please describe how and to what extent copyrights, trademarks,
and patents are relied on, or anticipated to be relied on, in your
field or industry to:
a. Protect assets that are associated with NFTs;
b. Combat infringement associated with NFT-related assets offered
by third parties; and
c. Ensure the availability of appropriate reuse of NFT-related
assets.
8. Are current IP laws adequate to address the protection and
enforcement of IP in the context of NFTs? If not, please explain why,
including any gaps in current IP laws, and describe any legislation you
believe should be considered to address these issues.
9. Please describe any IP-related impacts those in your field or
industry have experienced in connection with actual or intended uses of
NFTs. When relevant, please describe any legal disputes that have
arisen in the following contexts, and the outcome of such disputes,
including citations to any relevant judicial proceedings:
a. The relationship between the transfer of an NFT and the
ownership of IP rights in the associated asset;
b. The licensing of IP rights in the asset associated with an NFT;
c. Infringement claims when either (i) an NFT is associated with an
asset in which another party holds IP rights, or (ii) IP rights in the
asset associated with an NFT are owned by the NFT creator;
d. The type and/or scope of IP protection afforded to the NFT
creator, including when that party is not the creator of the associated
asset; and
e. The application of one or more of the exclusive rights under 17
U.S.C. 106 to transactions involving NFTs.
10. Please describe any instances you have observed in which a
party has sent or received:
a. A notification of claimed copyright infringement, counternotice
or material misrepresentation, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 512, in connection
with an NFT; and
b. Other IP-related legal claims seeking the removal or
reinstatement of NFT-associated materials.
[[Page 71586]]
For each such instance, please describe the nature and outcome of
this claim or process, including whether the material was ultimately
removed, and if so, whether the material subsequently reappeared. If an
infringement or 17 U.S.C. 512(f) action was filed, please provide
citations to the court docket and any relevant judicial decisions.
11. Please describe the extent to which adjustments are being made
to IP portfolio planning and management in light of the emergence of
NFTs.
12. Please describe any experiences in seeking IP protection for,
or use of, assets associated with NFTs in foreign jurisdictions.
13. Please identify any additional IP issues associated with NFTs
that you believe the Offices should consider in conducting this study.
II. Public Roundtables
The Offices will hold three public roundtables focused,
respectively, on copyrights, patents, and trademarks. The roundtables
are not expected to address broad topics in cryptocurrency or
decentralized systems generally, but rather only IP considerations as
they relate to NFTs.
Members of the public interested in participating as a panelist in
one or more roundtables must submit such a request to
[email protected] and provide their name, professional
affiliation, and contact information, and designate the roundtable(s)
at which they wish to speak. Such requests must be submitted by the
dates listed above (at DATES). Please note that written comments should
not be submitted to this address; any such comments will not be
considered.
The Offices will make every effort to ensure a broad range of
stakeholder views are represented on the panels but may not be able to
accommodate every request to participate. The Offices may also invite
participation from individuals and entities who have not requested to
participate. The submission of written comments in response to this
notice is not a prerequisite to participation as a panelist in a
roundtable.
The Offices will contact individuals selected to participate as
panelists at the roundtables for additional information to aid in
preparing for the roundtables. A tentative agenda for each roundtable
will be posted at https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/joint-study-intellectual-property-rights-and-non-fungible-tokens and https://copyright.gov/policy/nft-study approximately one week before it takes
place.
The roundtables will be livestreamed, and the Offices will post a
link and instructions for members of the public to register to view
them live. The USPTO will host Roundtable 1 (patents) and Roundtable 2
(trademarks). Additional information regarding these roundtables and
instructions for registering to view them will be posted at https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/joint-study-intellectual-property-rights-and-non-fungible-tokens. The USCO will host Roundtable 3 (copyrights).
Additional information regarding this roundtable and instructions for
registering to view it will be posted at https://copyright.gov/policy/nft-study. The roundtables will also be video-recorded and transcribed,
and copies of the recordings and transcripts will be available on the
above USPTO and USCO websites.
Katherine K. Vidal,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Dated: November 9, 2022.
Shira Perlmutter,
Register of Copyrights and Director, United States Copyright Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-25211 Filed 11-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P; 1410-30-P