Study on Non-Fungible Tokens and Related Intellectual Property Law Issues, 71584-71586 [2022-25211]

Download as PDF 71584 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2022 / Notices check the agenda on the OEAB website to confirm the public comment period schedule. The OEAB expects that public statements at its meetings will not be repetitive of previously submitted verbal or written statements. In general, each individual or group making a verbal presentation will be limited to three minutes. The Designated Federal Officer must receive written comments by November 27, 2022, to provide sufficient time for OEAB review. Written comments received after November 27, 2022, will be distributed to the OEAB but may not be reviewed prior to the meeting date. Comments should be submitted to Designated Federal Officer david.turner@noaa.gov. Special Accomodations: Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to the Designated Federal Officer by November 22, 2022. David Holst, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [FR Doc. 2022–25530 Filed 11–22–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–KA–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Patent and Trademark Office LIBRARY OF CONGRESS United States Copyright Office [Docket No.: PTO–C–2022–0035] Study on Non-Fungible Tokens and Related Intellectual Property Law Issues United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce; United States Copyright Office, Library of Congress. ACTION: Notice of inquiry; notice of public roundtables. AGENCY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the United States Copyright Office (USCO) (collectively, the Offices) are conducting a joint study regarding issues of intellectual property (IP) law and policy associated with non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The Offices seek public comments on these matters to assist in their work on IP policy related to NFTs and in conducting the study. In addition, the Offices are announcing a series of three public roundtables to allow them to gather further input. DATES: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Nov 22, 2022 Jkt 259001 Written comments: Public comments must be received no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 9, 2023. Public roundtables: Roundtable 1: Patents and NFTs. Roundtable 1 will be held on Tuesday, January 10, 2023. Requests to participate as a panelist must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 21, 2022. Roundtable 2: Trademarks and NFTs. Roundtable 2 will be held on Thursday, January 12, 2023. Requests to participate as a panelist must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 21, 2022. Roundtable 3: Copyright and NFTs. Roundtable 3 will be held on Wednesday, January 18, 2023. Requests to participate as a panelist must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 21, 2022. ADDRESSES: Submission of written comments: For reasons of Government efficiency, comments must be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. To submit comments via the portal, enter docket number PTO–C–2022–0035 on the homepage and click ‘‘Search.’’ The site will provide a search results page listing all documents associated with this docket. Find a reference to this request for information and click on the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in ADOBE® portable document format (PDF) or MICROSOFT WORD® format. Because comments will be made available for public inspection, information that the submitter does not desire to make public, such as an address or phone number, should not be included. Visit the Federal eRulemaking Portal for additional instructions on providing comments via the portal. If electronic submission of comments is not feasible due to a lack of access to a computer and/or the internet, please contact the Offices using the contact information below for special instructions on how to submit comments by other means. Submission of business confidential information: Any submissions containing business confidential information must be marked ‘‘confidential treatment requested’’ and submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Submitters should provide an index listing the document(s) or information they would like the Offices to withhold. The index should identify the confidential document(s) by document number(s) and document title(s) and should identify the confidential information by PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 description(s) and relevant page number(s) and/or section number(s) within a document. Submitters should provide a statement explaining their grounds for requesting non-disclosure of the information to the public as well. The Offices also request that submitters of business confidential information include a non-confidential version (either redacted or summarized) that will be posted on www.regulations.gov and available for public viewing. In the event that the submitter cannot provide a non-confidential version of their submission, the Offices request that the submitter post a notice in the docket stating that they have provided the Offices with business confidential information. Should a submitter fail either to docket a non-confidential version of their submission or to post a notice that they have provided business confidential information, the Offices will note the receipt of the submission on the docket with the submitter’s organization or name (to the degree permitted by law) and the date of submission. Anonymous submissions: The Offices will accept anonymous submissions. Enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous. Public roundtables: The roundtables will be conducted virtually. Roundtable 1 (patents) and Roundtable 2 (trademarks) will be conducted using the Webex videoconferencing platform. Roundtable 3 (copyright) will be conducted using the Zoom videoconferencing platform. Requests to participate as a panelist at one or more of these roundtables must be submitted via email to NFTStudySpeakingRequests@uspto.gov and must be received by the dates listed above (at DATES). Requests to participate as a panelist at a roundtable made in any other form, including as part of comments submitted via the Federal eRulemaking Portal, will not be considered. If email submission of requests to participate as a panelist is not feasible, please contact the Offices using the contact information below for special instructions. The submission of written comments in response to this notice is not a prerequisite to participation as a panelist in a roundtable. Please note that the Offices will review all requests to participate and will endeavor to invite participants representing diverse viewpoints on the subject matter discussed at each roundtable. The Offices may not be able to accommodate all requests. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin R. Amer, Senior Level Attorney, USPTO, kevin.amer@uspto.gov, 571– E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2022 / Notices 272–9300; Branden Ritchie, Senior Level Attorney, USPTO, branden.ritchie@uspto.gov, 571–272– 9300; Andrew Foglia, Senior Counsel, USCO, afoglia@copyright.gov, 202–707– 8350; or Jene´e Iyer, Counsel, USCO, jiyer@copyright.gov, 202–707–8350. The USPTO and the USCO have been consulting with stakeholders and working on both U.S. and international policy relating to emerging technologies, such as NFTs. These efforts have been collaborative, and each office also engages in its own activities impacting its respective responsibilities. For example, USPTO’s work in this area is being done as part of the USPTO’s AI and Emerging Technology Partnership, see https://www.uspto.gov/initiatives/ artificial-intelligence/ai-and-emergingtechnology-partnership-engagementand-events, and as part of separate consultations and collaborations. The USCO continues to examine copyright issues arising from emerging technologies such as NFTs, softwareenabled devices, and artificial intelligence. On June 9, 2022, Senators Patrick Leahy and Thom Tillis sent a letter to the USPTO and the USCO requesting that the Offices conduct a joint study addressing various IP law and policy issues associated with NFTs. The letter urged the Offices to ‘‘consult with the private sector, drawing from the technological, creative, and academic sectors.’’ USPTO and USCO responded on July 8, 2022, stating that ‘‘we will indeed conduct the study.’’ The Senators’ letter, and the agencies’ response, is at https:// www.copyright.gov/laws/hearings/ response-to-june-9-2022-letter.pdf. In furtherance of the study and consultations, the Offices request public comments on the questions provided below. Commenters need not respond to every question and may provide comments that are relevant to the subject matter of this study but that are not encompassed by the questions. Following the close of the public comment period, the Offices will hold a series of three public roundtables to allow members of the public to provide further input. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 I. Topics for Public Comment Note Regarding the Use of the Term ‘‘NFT’’: Merriam-Webster defines ‘‘nonfungible token’’ and ‘‘NFT’’ as ‘‘a unique digital identifier that cannot be copied, substituted, or subdivided, that is recorded in a blockchain, and that is used to certify authenticity and ownership (as of a specific digital asset VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Nov 22, 2022 Jkt 259001 and specific rights relating to it).’’ 1 The terms ‘‘NFT’’ and ‘‘NFTs’’ in the questions below should be read consistently with this general definition. Accordingly, for purposes of the questions below, the terms ‘‘NFT’’ and ‘‘NFTs’’ do not refer to the underlying asset,2 but rather to the unique identifier. To the extent that your responses contemplate a definition different from the Merriam-Webster definition, please provide your definition before answering the questions, and explain how it is relevant to your answers. Questions for Public Comment: The Offices welcome comments from members of the public on any issues relevant to the subject matter of this study, and are particularly interested in answers to the following questions. To the extent practicable, in your written response, please identify which questions you are answering. 1. Please describe: a. The current uses of NFTs in your field or industry, including the types of assets associated with NFTs (e.g., digital assets, physical goods, services); and b. Potential future applications of NFTs in your field or industry, including the types of assets that could be associated with NFTs (e.g., digital assets, physical goods, services). 2. Please describe any IP-related challenges or opportunities associated with NFTs or NFT markets. 3. Please describe how NFT markets affect the production of materials subject to IP protection. 4. Please describe whether, how, and to what extent NFTs are used by or could be used by IP rights holders (including those who hold trademarks, patents, and/or copyrights) to: a. Document the authenticity of an asset; b. Document the seller’s ownership of or authority to sell an asset; c. Document the seller’s authority to transfer any relevant or necessary IP rights associated with an asset; and d. Document any limitations related to IP rights surrounding the sale, or the purchaser’s use, of an asset. 5. Please describe whether, how, and to what extent NFTs present challenges for IP rights holders, or those who sell assets using NFTs, with respect to the activities described in Question 4 above. 6. Please describe whether, how, and to what extent NFTs are used by, could be used by, or present challenges or 1 Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). NFT. MerriamWebster.com dictionary, available at www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/NFT. 2 The Offices here use the word ‘‘asset’’ broadly and take no position on its meaning in the context of NFTs in other bodies of law. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 71585 opportunities for IP rights holders (including those who hold trademarks, patents, and/or copyrights) to: a. Obtain their IP rights; b. Transfer or license their IP rights; c. Exercise overall control and management of their IP rights (e.g., digital rights management tools, mechanisms to facilitate the payment of royalties, etc.); and d. Enforce their IP rights, including any mechanisms that could mitigate infringement or help ensure compliance with contractual terms associated with the sale of an asset. 7. Please describe how and to what extent copyrights, trademarks, and patents are relied on, or anticipated to be relied on, in your field or industry to: a. Protect assets that are associated with NFTs; b. Combat infringement associated with NFT-related assets offered by third parties; and c. Ensure the availability of appropriate reuse of NFT-related assets. 8. Are current IP laws adequate to address the protection and enforcement of IP in the context of NFTs? If not, please explain why, including any gaps in current IP laws, and describe any legislation you believe should be considered to address these issues. 9. Please describe any IP-related impacts those in your field or industry have experienced in connection with actual or intended uses of NFTs. When relevant, please describe any legal disputes that have arisen in the following contexts, and the outcome of such disputes, including citations to any relevant judicial proceedings: a. The relationship between the transfer of an NFT and the ownership of IP rights in the associated asset; b. The licensing of IP rights in the asset associated with an NFT; c. Infringement claims when either (i) an NFT is associated with an asset in which another party holds IP rights, or (ii) IP rights in the asset associated with an NFT are owned by the NFT creator; d. The type and/or scope of IP protection afforded to the NFT creator, including when that party is not the creator of the associated asset; and e. The application of one or more of the exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. 106 to transactions involving NFTs. 10. Please describe any instances you have observed in which a party has sent or received: a. A notification of claimed copyright infringement, counternotice or material misrepresentation, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 512, in connection with an NFT; and b. Other IP-related legal claims seeking the removal or reinstatement of NFT-associated materials. E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1 71586 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2022 / Notices For each such instance, please describe the nature and outcome of this claim or process, including whether the material was ultimately removed, and if so, whether the material subsequently reappeared. If an infringement or 17 U.S.C. 512(f) action was filed, please provide citations to the court docket and any relevant judicial decisions. 11. Please describe the extent to which adjustments are being made to IP portfolio planning and management in light of the emergence of NFTs. 12. Please describe any experiences in seeking IP protection for, or use of, assets associated with NFTs in foreign jurisdictions. 13. Please identify any additional IP issues associated with NFTs that you believe the Offices should consider in conducting this study. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 II. Public Roundtables The Offices will hold three public roundtables focused, respectively, on copyrights, patents, and trademarks. The roundtables are not expected to address broad topics in cryptocurrency or decentralized systems generally, but rather only IP considerations as they relate to NFTs. Members of the public interested in participating as a panelist in one or more roundtables must submit such a request to NFTStudySpeakingRequests@ uspto.gov and provide their name, professional affiliation, and contact information, and designate the roundtable(s) at which they wish to speak. Such requests must be submitted by the dates listed above (at DATES). Please note that written comments should not be submitted to this address; any such comments will not be considered. The Offices will make every effort to ensure a broad range of stakeholder views are represented on the panels but may not be able to accommodate every request to participate. The Offices may also invite participation from individuals and entities who have not requested to participate. The submission of written comments in response to this notice is not a prerequisite to participation as a panelist in a roundtable. The Offices will contact individuals selected to participate as panelists at the roundtables for additional information to aid in preparing for the roundtables. A tentative agenda for each roundtable will be posted at https://www.uspto.gov/ ip-policy/joint-study-intellectualproperty-rights-and-non-fungible-tokens and https://copyright.gov/policy/nftstudy approximately one week before it takes place. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Nov 22, 2022 Jkt 259001 The roundtables will be livestreamed, and the Offices will post a link and instructions for members of the public to register to view them live. The USPTO will host Roundtable 1 (patents) and Roundtable 2 (trademarks). Additional information regarding these roundtables and instructions for registering to view them will be posted at https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/ joint-study-intellectual-property-rightsand-non-fungible-tokens. The USCO will host Roundtable 3 (copyrights). Additional information regarding this roundtable and instructions for registering to view it will be posted at https://copyright.gov/policy/nft-study. The roundtables will also be videorecorded and transcribed, and copies of the recordings and transcripts will be available on the above USPTO and USCO websites. Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Dated: November 9, 2022. Shira Perlmutter, Register of Copyrights and Director, United States Copyright Office. [FR Doc. 2022–25211 Filed 11–22–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–16–P; 1410–30–P BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION [Docket No. CFPB–2022–0078] Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. ACTION: Notice and request for comment. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Bureau or CFPB) is requesting the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB’s) approval of a new information collection titled ‘‘Generic Information Collection Plan for Foundational Research about Consumer Credit Markets and Household Financial Decision-Making.’’ DATES: Written comments are encouraged and must be received on or before January 23, 2023 to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the title of the information collection, OMB Control Number (see below), and docket number (see above), by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 • Email: PRA_Comments@cfpb.gov. Include Docket No. CFPB–2022–0078 in the subject line of the email. • Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Comment Intake, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Attention: PRA Office), 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552. Because paper mail in the Washington, DC area and at the Bureau is subject to delay, commenters are encouraged to submit comments electronically. Please note that comments submitted after the comment period will not be accepted. In general, all comments received will become public records, including any personal information provided. Sensitive personal information, such as account numbers or Social Security numbers, should not be included. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Documentation prepared in support of this information collection request is available at www.regulations.gov. Requests for additional information should be directed to Anthony May, PRA Officer, at (202) 435–7278, or email: CFPB_PRA@cfpb.gov. If you require this document in an alternative electronic format, please contact CFPB_ Accessibility@cfpb.gov. Please do not submit comments to these email boxes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title of Collection: Generic Information Collection Plan for Foundational Research about Consumer Credit Markets and Household Financial Decision-Making. OMB Control Number: 3170–00XX. Type of Review: New collection. Affected Public: Individuals or households; private sector: businesses or other for-profits; not-for-profits institutions. Estimated Number of Respondents: 48,000. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 24,000. Abstract: Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Bureau is tasked with researching, analyzing, and reporting on topics relating to the Bureau’s mission, including developments in markets for consumer financial products and services, consumer awareness, and consumer behavior. Under this generic information collection plan, the Bureau collects data through qualitative and quantitative methods, including focus groups, interviews, and controlled trials in field and laboratory settings. The primary purpose of research carried out under this generic clearance is for foundational research of an exploratory nature. This foundational research will be used for developmental and E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71584-71586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

United States Copyright Office

[Docket No.: PTO-C-2022-0035]


Study on Non-Fungible Tokens and Related Intellectual Property 
Law Issues

AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of 
Commerce; United States Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Notice of inquiry; notice of public roundtables.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the 
United States Copyright Office (USCO) (collectively, the Offices) are 
conducting a joint study regarding issues of intellectual property (IP) 
law and policy associated with non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The Offices 
seek public comments on these matters to assist in their work on IP 
policy related to NFTs and in conducting the study. In addition, the 
Offices are announcing a series of three public roundtables to allow 
them to gather further input.

DATES: 
    Written comments: Public comments must be received no later than 
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 9, 2023.
    Public roundtables: Roundtable 1: Patents and NFTs. Roundtable 1 
will be held on Tuesday, January 10, 2023. Requests to participate as a 
panelist must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 21, 
2022.
    Roundtable 2: Trademarks and NFTs. Roundtable 2 will be held on 
Thursday, January 12, 2023. Requests to participate as a panelist must 
be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 21, 2022.
    Roundtable 3: Copyright and NFTs. Roundtable 3 will be held on 
Wednesday, January 18, 2023. Requests to participate as a panelist must 
be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on December 21, 2022.

ADDRESSES: 
    Submission of written comments: For reasons of Government 
efficiency, comments must be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at www.regulations.gov. To submit comments via the portal, enter 
docket number PTO-C-2022-0035 on the homepage and click ``Search.'' The 
site will provide a search results page listing all documents 
associated with this docket. Find a reference to this request for 
information and click on the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the 
required fields, and enter or attach your comments. Attachments to 
electronic comments will be accepted in ADOBE[supreg] portable document 
format (PDF) or MICROSOFT WORD[supreg] format. Because comments will be 
made available for public inspection, information that the submitter 
does not desire to make public, such as an address or phone number, 
should not be included. Visit the Federal eRulemaking Portal for 
additional instructions on providing comments via the portal. If 
electronic submission of comments is not feasible due to a lack of 
access to a computer and/or the internet, please contact the Offices 
using the contact information below for special instructions on how to 
submit comments by other means.
    Submission of business confidential information: Any submissions 
containing business confidential information must be marked 
``confidential treatment requested'' and submitted through the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal. Submitters should provide an index listing the 
document(s) or information they would like the Offices to withhold. The 
index should identify the confidential document(s) by document 
number(s) and document title(s) and should identify the confidential 
information by description(s) and relevant page number(s) and/or 
section number(s) within a document. Submitters should provide a 
statement explaining their grounds for requesting non-disclosure of the 
information to the public as well. The Offices also request that 
submitters of business confidential information include a non-
confidential version (either redacted or summarized) that will be 
posted on www.regulations.gov and available for public viewing. In the 
event that the submitter cannot provide a non-confidential version of 
their submission, the Offices request that the submitter post a notice 
in the docket stating that they have provided the Offices with business 
confidential information. Should a submitter fail either to docket a 
non-confidential version of their submission or to post a notice that 
they have provided business confidential information, the Offices will 
note the receipt of the submission on the docket with the submitter's 
organization or name (to the degree permitted by law) and the date of 
submission.
    Anonymous submissions: The Offices will accept anonymous 
submissions. Enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain 
anonymous.
    Public roundtables: The roundtables will be conducted virtually. 
Roundtable 1 (patents) and Roundtable 2 (trademarks) will be conducted 
using the Webex videoconferencing platform. Roundtable 3 (copyright) 
will be conducted using the Zoom videoconferencing platform. Requests 
to participate as a panelist at one or more of these roundtables must 
be submitted via email to [email protected] and must 
be received by the dates listed above (at DATES). Requests to 
participate as a panelist at a roundtable made in any other form, 
including as part of comments submitted via the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal, will not be considered. If email submission of requests to 
participate as a panelist is not feasible, please contact the Offices 
using the contact information below for special instructions. The 
submission of written comments in response to this notice is not a 
prerequisite to participation as a panelist in a roundtable. Please 
note that the Offices will review all requests to participate and will 
endeavor to invite participants representing diverse viewpoints on the 
subject matter discussed at each roundtable. The Offices may not be 
able to accommodate all requests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin R. Amer, Senior Level Attorney, 
USPTO, [email protected], 571-

[[Page 71585]]

272-9300; Branden Ritchie, Senior Level Attorney, USPTO, 
[email protected], 571-272-9300; Andrew Foglia, Senior Counsel, 
USCO, [email protected], 202-707-8350; or Jen[eacute]e Iyer, 
Counsel, USCO, [email protected], 202-707-8350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The USPTO and the USCO have been consulting 
with stakeholders and working on both U.S. and international policy 
relating to emerging technologies, such as NFTs. These efforts have 
been collaborative, and each office also engages in its own activities 
impacting its respective responsibilities. For example, USPTO's work in 
this area is being done as part of the USPTO's AI and Emerging 
Technology Partnership, see https://www.uspto.gov/initiatives/artificial-intelligence/ai-and-emerging-technology-partnership-engagement-and-events, and as part of separate consultations and 
collaborations. The USCO continues to examine copyright issues arising 
from emerging technologies such as NFTs, software-enabled devices, and 
artificial intelligence. On June 9, 2022, Senators Patrick Leahy and 
Thom Tillis sent a letter to the USPTO and the USCO requesting that the 
Offices conduct a joint study addressing various IP law and policy 
issues associated with NFTs. The letter urged the Offices to ``consult 
with the private sector, drawing from the technological, creative, and 
academic sectors.'' USPTO and USCO responded on July 8, 2022, stating 
that ``we will indeed conduct the study.'' The Senators' letter, and 
the agencies' response, is at https://www.copyright.gov/laws/hearings/response-to-june-9-2022-letter.pdf.
    In furtherance of the study and consultations, the Offices request 
public comments on the questions provided below. Commenters need not 
respond to every question and may provide comments that are relevant to 
the subject matter of this study but that are not encompassed by the 
questions. Following the close of the public comment period, the 
Offices will hold a series of three public roundtables to allow members 
of the public to provide further input.

I. Topics for Public Comment

    Note Regarding the Use of the Term ``NFT'': Merriam-Webster defines 
``non-fungible token'' and ``NFT'' as ``a unique digital identifier 
that cannot be copied, substituted, or subdivided, that is recorded in 
a blockchain, and that is used to certify authenticity and ownership 
(as of a specific digital asset and specific rights relating to it).'' 
\1\ The terms ``NFT'' and ``NFTs'' in the questions below should be 
read consistently with this general definition. Accordingly, for 
purposes of the questions below, the terms ``NFT'' and ``NFTs'' do not 
refer to the underlying asset,\2\ but rather to the unique identifier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). NFT. Merriam-Webster.com 
dictionary, available at www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/NFT.
    \2\ The Offices here use the word ``asset'' broadly and take no 
position on its meaning in the context of NFTs in other bodies of 
law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To the extent that your responses contemplate a definition 
different from the Merriam-Webster definition, please provide your 
definition before answering the questions, and explain how it is 
relevant to your answers.
    Questions for Public Comment: The Offices welcome comments from 
members of the public on any issues relevant to the subject matter of 
this study, and are particularly interested in answers to the following 
questions. To the extent practicable, in your written response, please 
identify which questions you are answering.
    1. Please describe:
    a. The current uses of NFTs in your field or industry, including 
the types of assets associated with NFTs (e.g., digital assets, 
physical goods, services); and
    b. Potential future applications of NFTs in your field or industry, 
including the types of assets that could be associated with NFTs (e.g., 
digital assets, physical goods, services).
    2. Please describe any IP-related challenges or opportunities 
associated with NFTs or NFT markets.
    3. Please describe how NFT markets affect the production of 
materials subject to IP protection.
    4. Please describe whether, how, and to what extent NFTs are used 
by or could be used by IP rights holders (including those who hold 
trademarks, patents, and/or copyrights) to:
    a. Document the authenticity of an asset;
    b. Document the seller's ownership of or authority to sell an 
asset;
    c. Document the seller's authority to transfer any relevant or 
necessary IP rights associated with an asset; and
    d. Document any limitations related to IP rights surrounding the 
sale, or the purchaser's use, of an asset.
    5. Please describe whether, how, and to what extent NFTs present 
challenges for IP rights holders, or those who sell assets using NFTs, 
with respect to the activities described in Question 4 above.
    6. Please describe whether, how, and to what extent NFTs are used 
by, could be used by, or present challenges or opportunities for IP 
rights holders (including those who hold trademarks, patents, and/or 
copyrights) to:
    a. Obtain their IP rights;
    b. Transfer or license their IP rights;
    c. Exercise overall control and management of their IP rights 
(e.g., digital rights management tools, mechanisms to facilitate the 
payment of royalties, etc.); and
    d. Enforce their IP rights, including any mechanisms that could 
mitigate infringement or help ensure compliance with contractual terms 
associated with the sale of an asset.
    7. Please describe how and to what extent copyrights, trademarks, 
and patents are relied on, or anticipated to be relied on, in your 
field or industry to:
    a. Protect assets that are associated with NFTs;
    b. Combat infringement associated with NFT-related assets offered 
by third parties; and
    c. Ensure the availability of appropriate reuse of NFT-related 
assets.
    8. Are current IP laws adequate to address the protection and 
enforcement of IP in the context of NFTs? If not, please explain why, 
including any gaps in current IP laws, and describe any legislation you 
believe should be considered to address these issues.
    9. Please describe any IP-related impacts those in your field or 
industry have experienced in connection with actual or intended uses of 
NFTs. When relevant, please describe any legal disputes that have 
arisen in the following contexts, and the outcome of such disputes, 
including citations to any relevant judicial proceedings:
    a. The relationship between the transfer of an NFT and the 
ownership of IP rights in the associated asset;
    b. The licensing of IP rights in the asset associated with an NFT;
    c. Infringement claims when either (i) an NFT is associated with an 
asset in which another party holds IP rights, or (ii) IP rights in the 
asset associated with an NFT are owned by the NFT creator;
    d. The type and/or scope of IP protection afforded to the NFT 
creator, including when that party is not the creator of the associated 
asset; and
    e. The application of one or more of the exclusive rights under 17 
U.S.C. 106 to transactions involving NFTs.
    10. Please describe any instances you have observed in which a 
party has sent or received:
    a. A notification of claimed copyright infringement, counternotice 
or material misrepresentation, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 512, in connection 
with an NFT; and
    b. Other IP-related legal claims seeking the removal or 
reinstatement of NFT-associated materials.

[[Page 71586]]

    For each such instance, please describe the nature and outcome of 
this claim or process, including whether the material was ultimately 
removed, and if so, whether the material subsequently reappeared. If an 
infringement or 17 U.S.C. 512(f) action was filed, please provide 
citations to the court docket and any relevant judicial decisions.
    11. Please describe the extent to which adjustments are being made 
to IP portfolio planning and management in light of the emergence of 
NFTs.
    12. Please describe any experiences in seeking IP protection for, 
or use of, assets associated with NFTs in foreign jurisdictions.
    13. Please identify any additional IP issues associated with NFTs 
that you believe the Offices should consider in conducting this study.

II. Public Roundtables

    The Offices will hold three public roundtables focused, 
respectively, on copyrights, patents, and trademarks. The roundtables 
are not expected to address broad topics in cryptocurrency or 
decentralized systems generally, but rather only IP considerations as 
they relate to NFTs.
    Members of the public interested in participating as a panelist in 
one or more roundtables must submit such a request to 
[email protected] and provide their name, professional 
affiliation, and contact information, and designate the roundtable(s) 
at which they wish to speak. Such requests must be submitted by the 
dates listed above (at DATES). Please note that written comments should 
not be submitted to this address; any such comments will not be 
considered.
    The Offices will make every effort to ensure a broad range of 
stakeholder views are represented on the panels but may not be able to 
accommodate every request to participate. The Offices may also invite 
participation from individuals and entities who have not requested to 
participate. The submission of written comments in response to this 
notice is not a prerequisite to participation as a panelist in a 
roundtable.
    The Offices will contact individuals selected to participate as 
panelists at the roundtables for additional information to aid in 
preparing for the roundtables. A tentative agenda for each roundtable 
will be posted at https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/joint-study-intellectual-property-rights-and-non-fungible-tokens and https://copyright.gov/policy/nft-study approximately one week before it takes 
place.
    The roundtables will be livestreamed, and the Offices will post a 
link and instructions for members of the public to register to view 
them live. The USPTO will host Roundtable 1 (patents) and Roundtable 2 
(trademarks). Additional information regarding these roundtables and 
instructions for registering to view them will be posted at https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/joint-study-intellectual-property-rights-and-non-fungible-tokens. The USCO will host Roundtable 3 (copyrights). 
Additional information regarding this roundtable and instructions for 
registering to view it will be posted at https://copyright.gov/policy/nft-study. The roundtables will also be video-recorded and transcribed, 
and copies of the recordings and transcripts will be available on the 
above USPTO and USCO websites.

Katherine K. Vidal,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

    Dated: November 9, 2022.
Shira Perlmutter,
Register of Copyrights and Director, United States Copyright Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-25211 Filed 11-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P; 1410-30-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.