Certain Chocolate Milk Powder and Packaging Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Issue a General Exclusion Order; Termination of Investigation, 70864-70866 [2022-25250]
Download as PDF
70864
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2022 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
States, and United States consumers, it finds
that such articles should not be excluded
from entry.
19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar
provision applies to cease and desist
orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1)
The Commission is soliciting
submissions on public interest issues
raised by the recommended relief
should the Commission find a violation,
specifically: a general exclusion order
(‘‘GEO’’) directed to certain flocked
swabs and products containing same, or,
if no GEO is issued, a limited exclusion
order directed to certain flocked swabs
and products containing same imported,
sold for importation, and/or sold after
importation by respondents Wuxi NEST
Biotechnology Co., Ltd., NEST Scientific
Inc., and NEST Scientific USA
(collectively, ‘‘NEST’’); Jiangsu
Changfeng Medical Industry Co.;
BioTeke Corporation (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.;
Miraclean Technology Co.; and
Huachenyang (Shenzhen) Technology
Co., Ltd. and HCY USA, LLC
(collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’); and a
cease and desist order directed to the
NEST Respondents. Parties are to file
public interest submissions pursuant to
19 CFR 210.50(a)(4).
The Commission is interested in
further development of the record on
the public interest in this investigation.
Accordingly, members of the public are
invited to file submissions of no more
than five (5) pages, inclusive of
attachments, concerning the public
interest in light of the ALJ’s
Recommended Determination on
Remedy and Bonding issued in this
investigation on November 14, 2022.
Comments should address whether
issuance of the recommended remedial
orders in this investigation, should the
Commission find a violation, would
affect the public health and welfare in
the United States, competitive
conditions in the United States
economy, the production of like or
directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) explain how the articles potentially
subject to the recommended remedial
orders are used in the United States;
(ii) identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the recommended orders;
(iii) identify like or directly
competitive articles that complainant,
its licensees, or third parties make in the
United States which could replace the
subject articles if they were to be
excluded;
(iv) indicate whether complainant,
complainant’s licensees, and/or third-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:25 Nov 18, 2022
Jkt 259001
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to the recommended
orders within a commercially
reasonable time; and
(v) explain how the recommended
orders would impact consumers in the
United States.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business on
December 14, 2022.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above. The Commission’s paper
filing requirements in 19 CFR 210.4(f)
are currently waived. 85 FR 15798 (Mar.
19, 2020). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.
337–TA–1279’’) in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page. (See
Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
documents/handbook_on_filing_
procedures.pdf.). Persons with
questions regarding filing should
contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment by marking each document
with a header indicating that the
document contains confidential
information. This marking will be
deemed to satisfy the request procedure
set forth in Rules 201.6(b) and
210.5(e)(2) (19 CFR 201.6(b) &
210.5(e)(2)). Documents for which
confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. Any non-party
wishing to submit comments containing
confidential information must serve
those comments on the parties to the
investigation pursuant to the applicable
Administrative Protective Order. A
redacted non-confidential version of the
document must also be filed
simultaneously with any confidential
filing and must be served in accordance
with Commission Rule 210.4(f)(7)(ii)(A)
(19 CFR 210.4(f)(7)(ii)(A)). All
information, including confidential
business information and documents for
which confidential treatment is properly
sought, submitted to the Commission for
purposes of this investigation may be
disclosed to and used: (i) by the
Commission, its employees and Offices,
and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records
of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the
programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5
U.S.C. appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract
personnel, solely for cybersecurity
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
purposes. All contract personnel will
sign appropriate nondisclosure
agreements. All nonconfidential written
submissions will be available for public
inspection on EDIS.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and in Part 210 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 15, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–25248 Filed 11–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1232 (REMAND)]
Certain Chocolate Milk Powder and
Packaging Thereof; Notice of a
Commission Determination To Issue a
General Exclusion Order; Termination
of Investigation
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to issue a
general exclusion order (‘‘GEO’’)
prohibiting the unlicensed importation
of chocolate milk powder and packaging
thereof that infringe U.S. Trademark
Registration No. 4,206,026 (‘‘the ’026
mark’’) (collectively, the ‘‘covered
products’’). The investigation is
terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket system
(‘‘EDIS’’) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For
help accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone
(202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on December 1, 2020, based on a
complaint filed on behalf of Meenaxi
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2022 / Notices
Enterprise Inc. (‘‘Meenaxi’’) of Edison,
New Jersey. 85 FR 77237–8 (Dec. 1,
2020). The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain chocolate milk powder and
packaging thereof by reason of
infringement of the ’026 mark. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named as respondents Bharat Bazar Inc.
of Union City, California; Madras Group
Inc. d/b/a Madras Groceries of
Sunnyvale, California; Coconut Hill Inc.
d/b/a Coconut Hill of Sunnyvale,
California; Organic Food d/b/a Namaste
Plaza Indian Super Market (‘‘Organic
Food’’) of Fremont, California; India
Cash & Carry of Sunnyvale California;
New India Bazar Inc. d/b/a New India
Bazar of San Jose, California; Aapka Big
Bazar of Jersey City, New Jersey; Siya
Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a Siya Cash &
Carry of Jersey City, New Jersey; JFK
Indian Grocery LLC d/b/a D-Mart Super
Market of Jersey City, New Jersey;
Trinethra Indian Super Markets of
Newark, California; Apna Bazar Cash &
Carry Inc. d/b/a Apna Bazar Cash &
Carry of Edison, New Jersey; Subzi
Mandi Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a Subzi
Mandi Cash & Carry of Piscataway, New
Jersey; Subhlaxmi Grocers of
Piscataway, New Jersey; Patidar Cash &
Carry Inc. d/b/a Patidar Cash & Carry of
South Plainfield, New Jersey; Keemat
Grocers of Sugarland, Texas; KGF World
Food Warehouse Inc. d/b/a World Food
Mart of Houston, Texas; Telfair Spices
of Sugarland Texas; Indian Groceries
and Spices Inc. d/b/a iShopIndia.com of
Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Rani Foods LP
d/b/a Rani’s World Foods of Houston,
Texas; Tathastu Trading LLC of South
Plainfield, New Jersey; and Choice
Trading LLC of Guttenberg, New Jersey.
Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party to
the investigation.
On February 10, 2021, the former
chief administrative law judge (‘‘CALJ’’)
issued an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 6) finding all respondents in
default. Order No. 6 (Feb. 10, 2021),
unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Mar. 2,
2021).
On May 24, 2021, Meenaxi moved for
a summary determination of violation
by all of the respondents, each of whom
had previously been found in default.
On June 16, 2021, OUII responded in
support of the motion. On December 1,
2021, the former CALJ granted the
motion as an ID (Order No. 15). No
petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The ID, however, noted discrepancies
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:25 Nov 18, 2022
Jkt 259001
with respect to respondent Organic
Food, calling into question whether that
respondent was ever properly served
with the complaint and notice of
investigation and with the CALJ’s order
to show cause why the respondents
should not be found in default, Order
No. 5 (Jan. 13, 2021). See Order No. 15
at 1 n.1. The Commission determined
sua sponte to review Order No. 15, and
ordered reconsideration of Order No. 6
as to Organic Food and/or any other
respondents who may not have been
properly served with documents in the
underlying investigation. Notice at 3
(Jan 18, 2022). The Commission
remanded the investigation to an ALJ for
further proceedings. Id.
On remand, the CALJ issued Order
No. 18, granting Meenaxi’s unopposed
motion for leave to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to
(i) substitute Organic Food with
proposed respondent Organic
Ingredients Inc. d/b/a Namaste Plaza
Indian Super Market (‘‘Organic
Ingredients’’) of San Diego, California;
(ii) correct the address of respondent
New India Bazar Inc. d/b/a New India
Bazar (‘‘New India’’) of San Jose,
California; (iii) correct the address of
respondent Bharat Bazar Inc. (‘‘Bharat
Bazar’’) of Union City, California; and
(iv) supplement the complaint with
Exhibits 9–a, 9–b, and 9–c, concerning
Organic Food and/or Organic
Ingredients. Order No. 18 at 1–5 (Mar.
11, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n
Notice, 87 FR 22940 (Apr. 18, 2020).
Meenaxi demonstrated that Bharat Bazar
had been actually served with all of the
documents in the investigation (prior to
remand) despite incorrectly spelling
Bharat Bazar’s address as being on
‘‘Niled Road’’ instead of ‘‘Niles Road.’’
Order No. 18 at 4.
The CALJ conducted remand
proceedings as to Organic Ingredients
and New India, first ordering them to
respond to the amended complaint and
notice of investigation, and then
ordering them to respond to an order to
show cause why they should not be
found in default. See Order No. 19 (Mar.
11, 2022); Order No. 21 at 3 (May 3,
2022). On May 19, 2022, the CALJ
issued an ID finding Organic Ingredients
and New India in default. Order No. 23
(May 19, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n
Notice (June 14, 2022).
On June 15, 2022, Meenaxi filed a
second motion for summary
determination of violation of section
337 as to the defaulting respondents,
and requested the issuance of a GEO. On
July 6, 2022, OUII responded in support
of Meenaxi’s motion.
On August 3, 2022, the CALJ issued
a remand ID (‘‘RID’’) (Order No. 27)
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70865
granting Meenaxi’s motion. Order No.
27 (Aug. 3, 2022), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Sept. 19, 2022). The
RID adopted substantially all of the
findings of Order No. 15. The CALJ
concurrently issued a recommended
determination (‘‘RD’’) on the issues of
remedy and bonding. The RD
recommended the issuance of a GEO
and setting the bond during the period
of Presidential review in the amount of
one hundred percent (100%) of the
entered value of the covered products.
Accordingly, the Commission
requested written submissions on the
issues of remedy, the public interest,
and bonding and the RD’s
recommendation as to issuance of a
GEO and bonding. 87 FR 58130–1 (Sept.
23, 2022). On October 3 and 12, 2022,
respectively, OUII and Meenaxi
submitted briefing responsive to the
Commission’s request. No other
submissions were received.
Having reviewed the record in the
investigation, including the written
submissions from Meenaxi and OUII,
the Commission has made its
determination on the issues of remedy,
the public interest, and bonding. As all
statutory requirements of this
subsection are met here, the
Commission has determined that the
appropriate remedy is a GEO directed to
the covered products pursuant to
section 337(g)(2), 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(2).
The Commission has further determined
that the public interest factors
enumerated in Section 337(d) (19 U.S.C.
1337(d)) do not preclude issuance of the
GEO. Accordingly, the Commission has
determined to issue a GEO prohibiting
the unlicensed entry of chocolate milk
powder and components thereof that
infringe the ’026 mark.
Finally, the Commission has
determined that a bond in the amount
of one hundred percent (100%) of the
entered value of the covered products is
required during the period of
Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)).
The Commission’s order was delivered
to the President and to the United States
Trade Representative on the day of its
issuance.
The Commission voted to approve
this determination on November 15,
2022.
The authority for the Commission’s
determinations is contained in Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210.
By order of the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
70866
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2022 / Notices
Issued: November 15, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–25250 Filed 11–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1315 (Review)]
Ferrovanadium From South Korea
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on
ferrovanadium from South Korea would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on April 1, 2022 (87 FR 19129)
and determined on July 5, 2022 that it
would conduct an expedited review (87
FR 63090, October 18, 2022).
The Commission made this
determination pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determination in
this review on November 15, 2022. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 5384 (November
2022), entitled Ferrovanadium from
South Korea: Investigation No. 731–TA–
1315 (Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 15, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
countervailing duty order on finished
carbon steel flanges from India and the
antidumping duty orders on finished
carbon steel flanges from India, Italy,
and Spain would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on May 2, 2022 (87 FR 25662)
and determined on August 5, 2022 that
it would conduct expedited reviews (87
FR 63798, October 20, 2022).
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these reviews on November 15, 2022.
The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 5385
(November 2022), entitled Finished
Carbon Steel Flanges from India, Italy,
and Spain: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–
563 and 731–TA–1331–1333 (Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 15, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–25247 Filed 11–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Task Force on Research on
Violence Against American Indian and
Alaska Native Women Meeting
Office on Violence Against
Women, United States Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2022–25249 Filed 11–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
The Office on Violence
Against Women (OVW), U.S.
Department of Justice has scheduled a
meeting of the Task Force on Research
on Violence Against American Indian
and Alaska Native Women (hereinafter
‘‘the Task Force’’).
DATES: The meeting will take place on
December 13, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 5
p.m. (Eastern Standard Time).
ADDRESSES: This meeting will be
convened virtually.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit
the OVW website at https://
www.justice.gov/ovw/section-904-taskforce or contact Sherriann Moore,
Deputy Director of Tribal Affairs, Office
on Violence Against Women, United
SUMMARY:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–563 and 731–
TA–1331–1333 (Review)]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From
India, Italy, and Spain
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:25 Nov 18, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
States Department of Justice, at (202)
616–0039 or ovw.tribalaffairs@
usdoj.gov.
Notice of
this meeting is required under section
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act. Title IX of the Violence
Against Women Act of 2005 (VAWA
2005), as amended, required the
Attorney General to establish a task
force to assist the National Institute of
Justice (NIJ) in developing and
implementing a program of research on
violence against American Indian and
Alaska Native women, including
domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, stalking, sex trafficking,
and murder. The program will evaluate
the effectiveness of the federal, state,
tribal, and local response to violence
against Indian women and propose
recommendations to improve the
government response. The Attorney
General, acting through the Director of
the Office on Violence Against Women,
established the Task Force on March 31,
2008, and the charter has been renewed
every two years since then.
More information on the Task Force
may be found at https://
www.justice.gov/ovw/section-904-taskforce and about the NIJ program of
research at: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/
articles/violence-against-americanindian-and-alaska-native-womenprogram-research.
This meeting will include the
introduction of Task Force members, an
update on NIJ’s research program, and
facilitated Task Force discussion on
research findings and recommendations.
In addition, the Task Force is also
welcoming public oral comment at this
meeting and has reserved 30 minutes for
this. The meeting will take place on
December 13, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 5
p.m. Time will be reserved for public
comment from 4:15 p.m. to 4:45 p.m.
See the section below for information on
reserving time for public comment.
Access: The meeting will be available
online via a video conferencing
platform. Members of the public who
wish to participate must register in
advance of the meeting online, no later
than December 7, 2022. Details about
registration can be found on the OVW
website: https://www.justice.gov/ovw/
section-904-task-force. Should issues
arise with online or email registration,
the public should contact Sherriann C.
Moore, Deputy Director of Tribal
Affairs, Office on Violence Against
Women, at (202) 616–0039 or
ovw.tribalaffairs@usdoj.gov.
Written Comments: Interested parties
are invited to submit written comments
by December 7, 2022, to Sherriann C.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70864-70866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25250]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1232 (REMAND)]
Certain Chocolate Milk Powder and Packaging Thereof; Notice of a
Commission Determination To Issue a General Exclusion Order;
Termination of Investigation
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to issue a general exclusion order (``GEO'')
prohibiting the unlicensed importation of chocolate milk powder and
packaging thereof that infringe U.S. Trademark Registration No.
4,206,026 (``the '026 mark'') (collectively, the ``covered products'').
The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket system (``EDIS'') at
https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on December 1, 2020, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Meenaxi
[[Page 70865]]
Enterprise Inc. (``Meenaxi'') of Edison, New Jersey. 85 FR 77237-8
(Dec. 1, 2020). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,
based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain chocolate milk powder and packaging thereof by reason of
infringement of the '026 mark. The Commission's notice of investigation
named as respondents Bharat Bazar Inc. of Union City, California;
Madras Group Inc. d/b/a Madras Groceries of Sunnyvale, California;
Coconut Hill Inc. d/b/a Coconut Hill of Sunnyvale, California; Organic
Food d/b/a Namaste Plaza Indian Super Market (``Organic Food'') of
Fremont, California; India Cash & Carry of Sunnyvale California; New
India Bazar Inc. d/b/a New India Bazar of San Jose, California; Aapka
Big Bazar of Jersey City, New Jersey; Siya Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a Siya
Cash & Carry of Jersey City, New Jersey; JFK Indian Grocery LLC d/b/a
D-Mart Super Market of Jersey City, New Jersey; Trinethra Indian Super
Markets of Newark, California; Apna Bazar Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a Apna
Bazar Cash & Carry of Edison, New Jersey; Subzi Mandi Cash & Carry Inc.
d/b/a Subzi Mandi Cash & Carry of Piscataway, New Jersey; Subhlaxmi
Grocers of Piscataway, New Jersey; Patidar Cash & Carry Inc. d/b/a
Patidar Cash & Carry of South Plainfield, New Jersey; Keemat Grocers of
Sugarland, Texas; KGF World Food Warehouse Inc. d/b/a World Food Mart
of Houston, Texas; Telfair Spices of Sugarland Texas; Indian Groceries
and Spices Inc. d/b/a iShopIndia.com of Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Rani
Foods LP d/b/a Rani's World Foods of Houston, Texas; Tathastu Trading
LLC of South Plainfield, New Jersey; and Choice Trading LLC of
Guttenberg, New Jersey. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations
(``OUII'') is also a party to the investigation.
On February 10, 2021, the former chief administrative law judge
(``CALJ'') issued an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 6)
finding all respondents in default. Order No. 6 (Feb. 10, 2021),
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Mar. 2, 2021).
On May 24, 2021, Meenaxi moved for a summary determination of
violation by all of the respondents, each of whom had previously been
found in default. On June 16, 2021, OUII responded in support of the
motion. On December 1, 2021, the former CALJ granted the motion as an
ID (Order No. 15). No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The
ID, however, noted discrepancies with respect to respondent Organic
Food, calling into question whether that respondent was ever properly
served with the complaint and notice of investigation and with the
CALJ's order to show cause why the respondents should not be found in
default, Order No. 5 (Jan. 13, 2021). See Order No. 15 at 1 n.1. The
Commission determined sua sponte to review Order No. 15, and ordered
reconsideration of Order No. 6 as to Organic Food and/or any other
respondents who may not have been properly served with documents in the
underlying investigation. Notice at 3 (Jan 18, 2022). The Commission
remanded the investigation to an ALJ for further proceedings. Id.
On remand, the CALJ issued Order No. 18, granting Meenaxi's
unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of
investigation to (i) substitute Organic Food with proposed respondent
Organic Ingredients Inc. d/b/a Namaste Plaza Indian Super Market
(``Organic Ingredients'') of San Diego, California; (ii) correct the
address of respondent New India Bazar Inc. d/b/a New India Bazar (``New
India'') of San Jose, California; (iii) correct the address of
respondent Bharat Bazar Inc. (``Bharat Bazar'') of Union City,
California; and (iv) supplement the complaint with Exhibits 9-a, 9-b,
and 9-c, concerning Organic Food and/or Organic Ingredients. Order No.
18 at 1-5 (Mar. 11, 2022), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice, 87 FR 22940
(Apr. 18, 2020). Meenaxi demonstrated that Bharat Bazar had been
actually served with all of the documents in the investigation (prior
to remand) despite incorrectly spelling Bharat Bazar's address as being
on ``Niled Road'' instead of ``Niles Road.'' Order No. 18 at 4.
The CALJ conducted remand proceedings as to Organic Ingredients and
New India, first ordering them to respond to the amended complaint and
notice of investigation, and then ordering them to respond to an order
to show cause why they should not be found in default. See Order No. 19
(Mar. 11, 2022); Order No. 21 at 3 (May 3, 2022). On May 19, 2022, the
CALJ issued an ID finding Organic Ingredients and New India in default.
Order No. 23 (May 19, 2022), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (June 14,
2022).
On June 15, 2022, Meenaxi filed a second motion for summary
determination of violation of section 337 as to the defaulting
respondents, and requested the issuance of a GEO. On July 6, 2022, OUII
responded in support of Meenaxi's motion.
On August 3, 2022, the CALJ issued a remand ID (``RID'') (Order No.
27) granting Meenaxi's motion. Order No. 27 (Aug. 3, 2022), unreviewed
by Comm'n Notice (Sept. 19, 2022). The RID adopted substantially all of
the findings of Order No. 15. The CALJ concurrently issued a
recommended determination (``RD'') on the issues of remedy and bonding.
The RD recommended the issuance of a GEO and setting the bond during
the period of Presidential review in the amount of one hundred percent
(100%) of the entered value of the covered products.
Accordingly, the Commission requested written submissions on the
issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding and the RD's
recommendation as to issuance of a GEO and bonding. 87 FR 58130-1
(Sept. 23, 2022). On October 3 and 12, 2022, respectively, OUII and
Meenaxi submitted briefing responsive to the Commission's request. No
other submissions were received.
Having reviewed the record in the investigation, including the
written submissions from Meenaxi and OUII, the Commission has made its
determination on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. As all statutory requirements of this subsection are met here,
the Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is a GEO
directed to the covered products pursuant to section 337(g)(2), 19
U.S.C. 1337(g)(2). The Commission has further determined that the
public interest factors enumerated in Section 337(d) (19 U.S.C.
1337(d)) do not preclude issuance of the GEO. Accordingly, the
Commission has determined to issue a GEO prohibiting the unlicensed
entry of chocolate milk powder and components thereof that infringe the
'026 mark.
Finally, the Commission has determined that a bond in the amount of
one hundred percent (100%) of the entered value of the covered products
is required during the period of Presidential review (19 U.S.C.
1337(j)). The Commission's order was delivered to the President and to
the United States Trade Representative on the day of its issuance.
The Commission voted to approve this determination on November 15,
2022.
The authority for the Commission's determinations is contained in
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210.
By order of the Commission.
[[Page 70866]]
Issued: November 15, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-25250 Filed 11-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P