Trinity Capital Inc., 69372-69375 [2022-25224]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
69372
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2022 / Notices
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Rule 155 (17 CFR 230.155) under the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et
seq.) provides safe harbors for a
registered offering of securities from
integration in two circumstances: (1) a
registered offering that follows an
abandoned private offering; and (2) a
private offering that follows a
withdrawn registered offering. Each of
the rule’s safe harbors imposes
conditions designed to assure that there
is a clean break between the abandoned
offering and the later offering. In each
safe harbor, these conditions include
specified disclosure designed to assure
that investors understand this break as
they consider an investment decision in
the later offering. We estimate Rule 155
takes approximately 4 hours per
response to prepare and is filed by
approximately 600 respondents
annually. We estimate that 50% of the
4 hours per response (2 hours per
response) is prepared by the filer for a
total annual reporting burden of 1,200
hours (2 hours per response × 600
responses).
Written comments are invited on: (a)
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden imposed by the collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication by January 17, 2023.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Please direct your written comment to
David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o John
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: November 15, 2022.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–25226 Filed 11–17–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Nov 17, 2022
Jkt 259001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–814, OMB Control No.
3235–0764]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Extension: Rule
6c–11
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
Rule 6c–11 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’)
permits exchange-traded funds (‘‘ETFs’’)
that satisfy certain conditions to operate
without first obtaining an exemptive
order from the Commission. The rule
was designed to create a consistent,
transparent, and efficient regulatory
framework for ETFs and facilitate
greater competition and innovation
among ETFs. Rule 6c–11 requires an
ETF to disclose certain information on
its website, to maintain certain records,
and to adopt and implement written
policies and procedures governing its
constructions of baskets, as well as
written policies and procedures that set
forth detailed parameters for the
construction and acceptance of custom
baskets that are in the best interests of
the ETF and its shareholders.
We estimate that the total hour
burdens and time costs associated with
rule 6c–11, including the burden
associated with reviewing and updating
website disclosures, recordkeeping, and
reviewing and updating policies and
procedures, will result in an average
aggregate annual burden of 51,156 hours
and an average aggregate time cost of
$1,248,912.
The requirements of this collection of
information are mandatory. If
information collected pursuant to rule
6c–11 is reviewed by the Commission’s
examination staff, it will be accorded
the same level of confidentiality
accorded to other responses provided to
the Commission in the context of its
examination and oversight program.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website:
www.reginfo.gov. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice by December 19, 2022 to (i)
MBX.OMB.OIRA.SEC_desk_officer@
omb.eop.gov and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer,
Securities and Exchange Commission, c/
o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an
email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: November 14, 2022.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–25097 Filed 11–17–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
34752; 812–15251]
Trinity Capital Inc.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice of an application under section
6(c) of the Investment Company Act of
1940 (the ‘‘Act’’) for an exemption from
section 12(d)(3) of the Act.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicant
requests an order to permit a business
development company (‘‘BDC’’) to
organize, acquire, and wholly-own a
portfolio company that intends to
operate as an investment adviser
registered under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Advisers
Act’’).
APPLICANT: Trinity Capital Inc. (the
‘‘Company’’ or ‘‘Applicant’’).
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on August 5, 2021, and amended on
August 5, 2022 and on November 7,
2022.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
An order granting the requested relief
will be issued unless the Commission
orders a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by emailing the
Commission’s Secretary at SecretarysOffice@sec.gov and serving Applicant
with a copy of the request, by email.
Hearing requests should be received by
the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on
December 12, 2022 and should be
accompanied by proof of service on the
Applicant, in the form of an affidavit, or
for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the Act,
hearing requests should state the nature
of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2022 / Notices
For
Applicants’ representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to
Applicants’ second amended and
restated application, dated November 7,
2022, which may be obtained via the
Commission’s website by searching for
the file number at the top of this
document, or for an Applicant using the
Company search field, on the SEC’s
EDGAR system. The SEC’s EDGAR
system may be searched at https://
www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/
companysearch.html. You may also call
the SEC’s Public Reference Room at
(202) 551–8090.
Applicant’s Representations:
1. The Company is a Maryland
corporation that operates as an
internally managed, closed-end, nondiversified management investment
company. The Company has elected to
be regulated as a BDC under the Act.
The Company’s investment objective is
to generate current income and, to a
lesser extent, capital appreciation
through its investments. The Company
seeks to achieve its investment objective
by making investments consisting
primarily of term loans and equipment
financings and, to a lesser extent,
working capital loans, equity and
equity-related investments.
2. The Company intends to organize,
acquire, and wholly own the securities
of a portfolio company (‘‘Adviser Sub’’),
which it expects to be formed as a
limited liability company under the
laws of the State of Delaware and will
be a direct or an indirect wholly owned
portfolio company of the Company.1 As
discussed below, the Adviser Sub
intends to operate as an investment
adviser registered with the Commission
under the Advisers Act.2 The Company
expects the Adviser Sub to receive fees
in connection with its management of
one or more privately-offered pooled
investment vehicles, registered
management investment companies,
BDCs, and/or investment accounts
(collectively, ‘‘Managed Accounts’’)
similar to those received by comparable
investment advisers.
3. Those Managed Accounts that are
not registered managed investment
companies or BDCs (such Managed
Accounts, ‘‘Private Fund Managed
Accounts’’) may make equity
investments in growth stage portfolio
companies via participation rights.
Participation rights will generally be
negotiated by the Company at the time
the Company makes a debt investment
in, or enters into an equipment
financing agreement with, a growth
stage portfolio company. Managed
Accounts other than Private Fund
Managed Accounts would not
participate in such investments.
4. The Company is, and the Adviser
Sub will be, directly or indirectly
overseen by the Company’s six member
Board of Directors (the ‘‘Board’’), of
whom four are not considered
‘‘interested persons’’ of the Company
within the meaning of section 2(a)(19) of
the Act. In its capacity as the Board of
the Advisers Sub’s parent company, the
Board will indirectly oversee the
Adviser Sub.
5. The Company has elected to be
treated for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, and intends to qualify
annually, as a regulated investment
company (‘‘RIC’’) under Subchapter M
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the ‘‘Code’’). Applicant states
that as a RIC, the Company generally
will not pay corporate-level federal
income taxes on any net ordinary
income or capital gains that it
distributes to its stockholders as
dividends in accordance with the timing
requirements of the Code. To maintain
its RIC status, the Company must,
among other things, meet specified
source-of-income requirements.
Applicant states that the Company will
satisfy the source-of-income test for
purposes of qualifying as a RIC if it
derives in each taxable year at least 90%
of its gross income from dividends,
interest, payments with respect to
certain securities loans, gains from the
sale of stock or other securities or
currencies, net income from certain
‘‘qualified publicly traded partnerships’’
1 Adviser Sub will be a wholly owned portfolio
company of the Company and will also fall within
the definition of ‘‘wholly owned subsidiary’’ for
purposes of section 2(a)(43) of the Act.
2 Adviser Sub has not yet been formed, but it does
not intend to commence operations unless and until
the relief requested in the application has been
granted.
upon the desirability of a hearing on the
matter, the reason for the request, and
the issues contested. Persons who wish
to be notified of a hearing may request
notification by emailing the
Commission’s Secretary at SecretarysOffice@sec.gov.
The Commission:
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicant:
Steven L. Brown, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, Trinity Capital Inc.
atsbrown@trincapinvestment.com.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harry Eisenstein, Senior Special
Counsel, or Terri Jordan, Branch Chief,
at (202) 551–6825 (Division of
Investment Management, Chief
Counsel’s Office).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Nov 17, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69373
(as defined in the Code) or other income
derived with respect to its business of
investing in such stock, securities or
currencies (income from such sources,
‘‘Good RIC Income’’).
6. Applicant states that fee income
received in connection with the
provision of services to the Managed
Accounts generally would not constitute
Good RIC Income to the Company if it
earned such income directly. Therefore,
in order for the Company to maintain its
RIC status while receiving the income
from the provision of advisory services
to the Managed Accounts, the Company
believes that it is in the best interests of
the Company and its shareholders for
the Adviser Sub to provide advisory
services to and to receive fees from the
Managed Accounts instead of the
Company providing such services and
receiving such fees directly.
7. Under the Advisers Act, an
investment adviser is generally required
to be registered if it has $100 million or
more of regulatory assets under
management.3 An investment adviser
may also register under the Advisers Act
in compliance with rule 203A–2(c)(1) of
the Advisers Act if it expects to be
eligible to register an as adviser within
120 days of registering.
Applicant states that the Adviser Sub
will register as an investment adviser
under the Advisers Act in compliance
with rule 203A–2(c)(1) of the Advisers
Act after the relief requested in the
application is granted to the Company
because the Adviser Sub expects to have
$100 million or more of regulatory
assets under management within 120
days of such registration.
Applicable Law:
1. Section 12(d)(3) makes it unlawful
for any registered investment company,
and any company controlled by a
registered investment company, to
acquire any interest in the business of
a person who is either an investment
adviser of an investment company or an
investment adviser registered under the
Advisers Act, unless (a) such person is
a corporation all the outstanding
securities of which are owned by one or
more registered investment companies;
and (b) such person is primarily
engaged in the business of underwriting
and distributing securities issued by
other persons, selling securities issued
3 In addition, an investment adviser to an
investment company registered under the Act or to
a company that has elected to be a BDC with $25
million or more of regulatory assets under
management would also be required to register
under the Advisers Act. Applicants state that the
Adviser Sub also may act as an investment adviser
to an investment company registered under the Act
or to a company that has elected to be a BDC with
$25 million or more of regulatory assets under
management after the relief requested is granted.
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
69374
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2022 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
by other persons, selling securities to
customers, or any one or more of such
or related activities, and the gross
income of such person normally is
derived principally from such business
or related activities. Section 60 of the
Act states that section 12 shall apply to
a BDC to the same extent as if it were
a registered closed-end investment
company.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
the Commission may exempt any person
or transaction from any provision of the
Act if and to the extent that such
exemption is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act.
Applicant’s Legal Analysis
1. Applicant represents that the
Company will own 100% of the equity
interests in the Adviser Sub. However,
Applicant states that it is not expected
that the Adviser Sub would also be a
broker-dealer that is primarily engaged
in the business of underwriting and
distributing securities issued by other
persons. The ownership of the Adviser
Sub, at such point as it becomes
registered as an investment adviser,
could thus cause the Company to be in
violation of the provisions of section
12(d)(3) unless the requested Order is
issued.4 In addition, the Company
expects that after the relief requested in
the application is granted the Adviser
Sub will act as an investment adviser to
investment companies. To the extent it
does so, relief from section 12(d)(3) is
also required because the Adviser Sub
acting as an investment adviser of an
investment company would result in the
Company acquiring a security of an
investment adviser of an investment
company. Therefore, Applicant requests
the Order pursuant to section 6(c) of the
Act granting an exemption from the
provisions of section 12(d)(3) of the Act,
to the extent necessary in order to
permit the Company to organize,
acquire, and wholly own the securities
of the Adviser Sub.
2. Applicant states that section
12(d)(3) was intended to: (a) limit the
risk of a registered investment
4 Rule 12d3–1(a) and (b) under the Act each
provides limited relief from the restrictions of
section 12(d)(3) if the acquired company derives 15
percent or less of its gross revenues from securities
related activities (as defined in the rule) or the
acquiring company owns not more than five percent
of the outstanding securities of that class of the
acquired company’s equity securities. The
Company does not believe that it may rely on this
relief with respect to its investment in Adviser Sub,
since the Company expects that a significant
portion of the Adviser Sub’s gross revenues will be
derived from securities related activities and the
Company will own all of the outstanding securities
of the Adviser Sub.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Nov 17, 2022
Jkt 259001
company’s exposure to the
entrepreneurial risks, or general
liabilities, that are peculiar to securitiesrelated businesses; and (b) prevent
potential conflicts of interest and
reciprocal practices between investment
companies and securities-related
businesses. Applicant submits that the
Company’s ownership and control of
the Adviser Sub does not present the
concerns against which section 12(d)(3)
was intended to safeguard.
3. Applicant states that much of the
concern regarding entrepreneurial risks
stemmed from the fact that when
section 12(d)(3) was adopted, most
securities-related businesses were
organized as privately held general
partnerships. As a result, an investment
in such a company would expose an
investment company to the unlimited
liabilities of a general partner. Applicant
notes that today’s financial services
industry is subject to a much more
robust body of regulation, which
contributes to a more conservative risk
profile for those companies that
comprise the industry. Moreover,
Applicant states that the risks presented
by the form of organization of a
securities-related business are no longer
as germane as they were at the time of
the adoption of section 12(d)(3) because
many formerly closely-held securitiesrelated businesses have reorganized into
corporate forms that are characterized
by limited liability. Applicant asserts in
particular that the Company’s
shareholders are not exposed to the risk
of unlimited liability associated with an
interest in the Adviser Sub because they
are insulated by a layer of liability
protection between the Adviser Sub and
the Company, as the Adviser Sub is a
separate entity and is structured as a
limited liability company, not a
partnership.
4. Applicant also submits that the
Company will own 100% of the equity
interests in the Adviser Sub and, as a
result, will exercise total control over
the strategic direction of the Adviser
Sub, including the power to control the
policies that affect the Company and to
protect the Company from potential
conflicts of interest and reciprocal
practices. Moreover, as a wholly owned
portfolio company and the sole
shareholder of the Adviser Sub, the
Adviser Sub and the Company will
generally have aligned interests.
5. Applicant states that the Company
will adopt policies and procedures with
respect to the Adviser Sub designed to
ensure that the Company and the
Adviser Sub are both being operated
and managed in the best interests of the
Company’s shareholders and that the
ownership by the Company of the
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Adviser Sub is consistent with the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act.5 Applicant
states that the Company and the Adviser
Sub will adopt policies and procedures
to address potential conflicts of interest,
including but not limited to policies and
procedures that govern the allocation of
expenses, personal securities trading,
and insider trading and confidentiality
of proprietary information.
6. Applicant notes that the Company
and the Managed Accounts may invest
in the same securities or different
securities of the same issuer to the
extent consistent with applicable law,
regulatory guidance, or any exemptive
order obtained by the Company. The
Company and the Adviser Sub will
implement policies and procedures that
will govern the allocation of investment
opportunities when investment advisory
personnel of the Company and/or
Adviser Sub become aware of
investment opportunities that may be
appropriate for the Company and one or
more Managed Accounts.
7. Applicant asserts that the
acquisition by Private Fund Managed
Accounts of participation rights
negotiated by the Company would not
trigger the application of section 57(a)
because the Private Fund Managed
Accounts are ‘‘downstream’’ affiliates of
the Company and, as a result, Applicant
notes that rule 57b–1 would apply.
Applicant agrees that, to the extent the
Company’s compliance personnel
believes a conflict arises out of the
sharing of information obtained due to
ownership by the Company, on the one
hand, and a Managed Account, on the
other hand, of different instruments
issued by the same issuer, an
information wall will be put into place
limiting the flow of information
between the Company and the
applicable Managed Account (and the
Adviser Sub as its manager).
8. Applicant states that the
Company’s proposal to enter into the
advisory business through a wholly
owned and controlled portfolio
company will benefit the Company’s
shareholders by: (a) allowing them to
share in the profits from the new
advisory business; (b) allowing that
advisory business to be more marketable
than if the services were provided by
the Company itself; and (c) limiting any
potential liabilities arising from Adviser
5 Applicant represents that the Adviser Sub’s
borrowings, if any, would be used only for its own
legitimate business purposes, and would not be
used directly or indirectly by the Company for its
business purposes unrelated to the Adviser Sub,
and that the Company will adopt procedures to
ensure Board oversight of compliance with this
representation.
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2022 / Notices
Sub’s provision of advisory services. In
addition, the growth in the Company’s
advisory business through the Adviser
Sub will enable the Company to add
advisory personnel that it could not on
its own, such as additional portfolio
managers and investment analysts, who
will be available to provide advisory
services both to the Company and to the
Managed Accounts of the Adviser Sub
and further enhance the experience and
relationships of the Company’s
investment team. Without the growth of
the Company’s advisory business
through the Adviser Sub, the Company
would not have the ability to support
such additional advisory personnel.
Applicant also states that the Adviser
Sub’s organization as a wholly owned
portfolio company of the Company and
registration as an investment adviser
would permit the Adviser Sub to
operate the business of managing the
Managed Accounts as a direct or an
indirect wholly owned taxable portfolio
company of the Company, thereby
protecting the Company’s RIC status.
9. Applicant represents that the
Company’s Board, including a majority
of the disinterested directors, found that
the Company organizing, acquiring, and
wholly owning 100% of the equity
interest in the Adviser Sub subsequent
to its registration as an investment
adviser is in the best interests of the
Company and its shareholders.
Applicant agrees that the Board will
review at least annually the investment
advisory business of the Adviser Sub to
determine whether such business
should be continued and whether the
benefits derived by the Company from
the Adviser Sub’s business warrant the
continued ownership of the Adviser
Sub. Applicant states that shareholders
of the Company will be provided with
notice, in advance of, or concurrent
with, the Adviser Sub’s start of
investment advisory activities.
10. Accordingly, Applicant represents
that the requested relief is both
necessary and appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
Applicant’s Conditions:
Applicant agrees that the Order of the
Commission granting the requested
relief shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1. The determination to enter into the
advisory business through the Adviser
Sub has been made by a vote of at least
a majority of the Board who are not
‘‘interested persons’’ of the Company as
defined in section 2(a)(19).
2. The Company will wholly own and
control the Adviser Sub. The Company
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Nov 17, 2022
Jkt 259001
will not have an investment adviser
within the meaning of section 2(a)(20).
Only persons acting in their capacities
as directors, officers or employees of the
Company will provide advisory services
to the Company.
3. In each of its annual reports to
shareholders and in future registration
statements, the Company will discuss
the existence of the Adviser Sub and the
provision by the Adviser Sub of outside
advisory services as well as include an
assessment of whatever risks, if any, are
associated with the existence of the
Adviser Sub and its provision of such
services.
4. The Adviser Sub will not make any
proprietary investment that the
Company would be prohibited from
making directly under the Company’s
investment objectives, policies and
restrictions or under any applicable law.
5. In assessing compliance with the
asset coverage requirements under
section 18 of the Act, the Company will
deem the assets, liabilities, and
indebtedness of the Adviser Sub as its
own.
6. The Board will review at least
annually the investment advisory
business of the Adviser Sub to
determine whether such business
should be continued and whether the
benefits derived by the Company from
the Adviser Sub’s business warrant the
continued ownership of the Adviser Sub
and, if appropriate, approve (by a vote
of at least a majority of its directors who
are not ‘‘interested persons’’ as defined
in the Act) at least annually such
continuation. In determining whether
the investment advisory business of the
Adviser Sub should be continued and
whether the benefits derived by the
Company from the Adviser Sub’s
business warrant the continued
ownership of the Adviser Sub, the
Board will take into consideration,
among other things, the following: (a)
the compensation of the officers of the
Company and of the Adviser Sub; (b) all
investments by and investment
opportunities considered for the
Company that relate to any investments
by or investment opportunities
considered for a client of the Adviser
Sub; and (c) the allocation of expenses
associated with the provision of
advisory services between the Company
and the Adviser Sub.6
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
6 Such expenses may include: administration and
operating expenses; investment research expenses;
sales and marketing expenses; office space and
general expenses; and direct expenses, including
legal and audit fees, directors’ fees and taxes.
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69375
Dated: November 15, 2022.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–25224 Filed 11–17–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–115, OMB Control
No.3235–0132]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Extension: 7a–15 Through
7a–37
Upon Written Request Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Rules 7a–15 through 7a–37 (17 CFR
260.7a–15—260.7a–37) under the Trust
Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77aaa
et seq.) set forth the general
requirements as to form and content of
applications, statements and reports that
must be filed under the Trust Indenture
Act. The respondents are persons and
entities subject to requirements of the
Trust Indenture Act. Trust Indenture
Act Rules 7a–15 through 7a–37 are
disclosure guidelines and do not
directly result in any collection of
information. The rules are assigned only
one burden hour for administrative
convenience.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden imposed by the collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication by January 17, 2023.
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 222 (Friday, November 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69372-69375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25224]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 34752; 812-15251]
Trinity Capital Inc.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from section
12(d)(3) of the Act.
Summary of Application: Applicant requests an order to permit a
business development company (``BDC'') to organize, acquire, and
wholly-own a portfolio company that intends to operate as an investment
adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the
``Advisers Act'').
Applicant: Trinity Capital Inc. (the ``Company'' or ``Applicant'').
Filing Dates: The application was filed on August 5, 2021, and amended
on August 5, 2022 and on November 7, 2022.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by emailing the Commission's
Secretary at [email protected] and serving Applicant with a
copy of the request, by email. Hearing requests should be received by
the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on December 12, 2022 and should be
accompanied by proof of service on the Applicant, in the form of an
affidavit, or for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule
0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, any facts bearing
[[Page 69373]]
upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by emailing the Commission's Secretary
at [email protected].
Addresses: The Commission: [email protected]. Applicant:
Steven L. Brown, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Trinity Capital
Inc. [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry Eisenstein, Senior Special
Counsel, or Terri Jordan, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6825 (Division of
Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants' representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to Applicants' second amended
and restated application, dated November 7, 2022, which may be obtained
via the Commission's website by searching for the file number at the
top of this document, or for an Applicant using the Company search
field, on the SEC's EDGAR system. The SEC's EDGAR system may be
searched at https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may also call the SEC's Public Reference Room
at (202) 551-8090.
Applicant's Representations:
1. The Company is a Maryland corporation that operates as an
internally managed, closed-end, non-diversified management investment
company. The Company has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the
Act. The Company's investment objective is to generate current income
and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation through its investments.
The Company seeks to achieve its investment objective by making
investments consisting primarily of term loans and equipment financings
and, to a lesser extent, working capital loans, equity and equity-
related investments.
2. The Company intends to organize, acquire, and wholly own the
securities of a portfolio company (``Adviser Sub''), which it expects
to be formed as a limited liability company under the laws of the State
of Delaware and will be a direct or an indirect wholly owned portfolio
company of the Company.\1\ As discussed below, the Adviser Sub intends
to operate as an investment adviser registered with the Commission
under the Advisers Act.\2\ The Company expects the Adviser Sub to
receive fees in connection with its management of one or more
privately-offered pooled investment vehicles, registered management
investment companies, BDCs, and/or investment accounts (collectively,
``Managed Accounts'') similar to those received by comparable
investment advisers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Adviser Sub will be a wholly owned portfolio company of the
Company and will also fall within the definition of ``wholly owned
subsidiary'' for purposes of section 2(a)(43) of the Act.
\2\ Adviser Sub has not yet been formed, but it does not intend
to commence operations unless and until the relief requested in the
application has been granted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Those Managed Accounts that are not registered managed
investment companies or BDCs (such Managed Accounts, ``Private Fund
Managed Accounts'') may make equity investments in growth stage
portfolio companies via participation rights. Participation rights will
generally be negotiated by the Company at the time the Company makes a
debt investment in, or enters into an equipment financing agreement
with, a growth stage portfolio company. Managed Accounts other than
Private Fund Managed Accounts would not participate in such
investments.
4. The Company is, and the Adviser Sub will be, directly or
indirectly overseen by the Company's six member Board of Directors (the
``Board''), of whom four are not considered ``interested persons'' of
the Company within the meaning of section 2(a)(19) of the Act. In its
capacity as the Board of the Advisers Sub's parent company, the Board
will indirectly oversee the Adviser Sub.
5. The Company has elected to be treated for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, and intends to qualify annually, as a regulated
investment company (``RIC'') under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the ``Code''). Applicant states that as a
RIC, the Company generally will not pay corporate-level federal income
taxes on any net ordinary income or capital gains that it distributes
to its stockholders as dividends in accordance with the timing
requirements of the Code. To maintain its RIC status, the Company must,
among other things, meet specified source-of-income requirements.
Applicant states that the Company will satisfy the source-of-income
test for purposes of qualifying as a RIC if it derives in each taxable
year at least 90% of its gross income from dividends, interest,
payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale
of stock or other securities or currencies, net income from certain
``qualified publicly traded partnerships'' (as defined in the Code) or
other income derived with respect to its business of investing in such
stock, securities or currencies (income from such sources, ``Good RIC
Income'').
6. Applicant states that fee income received in connection with the
provision of services to the Managed Accounts generally would not
constitute Good RIC Income to the Company if it earned such income
directly. Therefore, in order for the Company to maintain its RIC
status while receiving the income from the provision of advisory
services to the Managed Accounts, the Company believes that it is in
the best interests of the Company and its shareholders for the Adviser
Sub to provide advisory services to and to receive fees from the
Managed Accounts instead of the Company providing such services and
receiving such fees directly.
7. Under the Advisers Act, an investment adviser is generally
required to be registered if it has $100 million or more of regulatory
assets under management.\3\ An investment adviser may also register
under the Advisers Act in compliance with rule 203A-2(c)(1) of the
Advisers Act if it expects to be eligible to register an as adviser
within 120 days of registering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In addition, an investment adviser to an investment company
registered under the Act or to a company that has elected to be a
BDC with $25 million or more of regulatory assets under management
would also be required to register under the Advisers Act.
Applicants state that the Adviser Sub also may act as an investment
adviser to an investment company registered under the Act or to a
company that has elected to be a BDC with $25 million or more of
regulatory assets under management after the relief requested is
granted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant states that the Adviser Sub will register as an
investment adviser under the Advisers Act in compliance with rule 203A-
2(c)(1) of the Advisers Act after the relief requested in the
application is granted to the Company because the Adviser Sub expects
to have $100 million or more of regulatory assets under management
within 120 days of such registration.
Applicable Law:
1. Section 12(d)(3) makes it unlawful for any registered investment
company, and any company controlled by a registered investment company,
to acquire any interest in the business of a person who is either an
investment adviser of an investment company or an investment adviser
registered under the Advisers Act, unless (a) such person is a
corporation all the outstanding securities of which are owned by one or
more registered investment companies; and (b) such person is primarily
engaged in the business of underwriting and distributing securities
issued by other persons, selling securities issued
[[Page 69374]]
by other persons, selling securities to customers, or any one or more
of such or related activities, and the gross income of such person
normally is derived principally from such business or related
activities. Section 60 of the Act states that section 12 shall apply to
a BDC to the same extent as if it were a registered closed-end
investment company.
2. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt
any person or transaction from any provision of the Act if and to the
extent that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
Applicant's Legal Analysis
1. Applicant represents that the Company will own 100% of the
equity interests in the Adviser Sub. However, Applicant states that it
is not expected that the Adviser Sub would also be a broker-dealer that
is primarily engaged in the business of underwriting and distributing
securities issued by other persons. The ownership of the Adviser Sub,
at such point as it becomes registered as an investment adviser, could
thus cause the Company to be in violation of the provisions of section
12(d)(3) unless the requested Order is issued.\4\ In addition, the
Company expects that after the relief requested in the application is
granted the Adviser Sub will act as an investment adviser to investment
companies. To the extent it does so, relief from section 12(d)(3) is
also required because the Adviser Sub acting as an investment adviser
of an investment company would result in the Company acquiring a
security of an investment adviser of an investment company. Therefore,
Applicant requests the Order pursuant to section 6(c) of the Act
granting an exemption from the provisions of section 12(d)(3) of the
Act, to the extent necessary in order to permit the Company to
organize, acquire, and wholly own the securities of the Adviser Sub.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Rule 12d3-1(a) and (b) under the Act each provides limited
relief from the restrictions of section 12(d)(3) if the acquired
company derives 15 percent or less of its gross revenues from
securities related activities (as defined in the rule) or the
acquiring company owns not more than five percent of the outstanding
securities of that class of the acquired company's equity
securities. The Company does not believe that it may rely on this
relief with respect to its investment in Adviser Sub, since the
Company expects that a significant portion of the Adviser Sub's
gross revenues will be derived from securities related activities
and the Company will own all of the outstanding securities of the
Adviser Sub.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Applicant states that section 12(d)(3) was intended to: (a)
limit the risk of a registered investment company's exposure to the
entrepreneurial risks, or general liabilities, that are peculiar to
securities-related businesses; and (b) prevent potential conflicts of
interest and reciprocal practices between investment companies and
securities-related businesses. Applicant submits that the Company's
ownership and control of the Adviser Sub does not present the concerns
against which section 12(d)(3) was intended to safeguard.
3. Applicant states that much of the concern regarding
entrepreneurial risks stemmed from the fact that when section 12(d)(3)
was adopted, most securities-related businesses were organized as
privately held general partnerships. As a result, an investment in such
a company would expose an investment company to the unlimited
liabilities of a general partner. Applicant notes that today's
financial services industry is subject to a much more robust body of
regulation, which contributes to a more conservative risk profile for
those companies that comprise the industry. Moreover, Applicant states
that the risks presented by the form of organization of a securities-
related business are no longer as germane as they were at the time of
the adoption of section 12(d)(3) because many formerly closely-held
securities-related businesses have reorganized into corporate forms
that are characterized by limited liability. Applicant asserts in
particular that the Company's shareholders are not exposed to the risk
of unlimited liability associated with an interest in the Adviser Sub
because they are insulated by a layer of liability protection between
the Adviser Sub and the Company, as the Adviser Sub is a separate
entity and is structured as a limited liability company, not a
partnership.
4. Applicant also submits that the Company will own 100% of the
equity interests in the Adviser Sub and, as a result, will exercise
total control over the strategic direction of the Adviser Sub,
including the power to control the policies that affect the Company and
to protect the Company from potential conflicts of interest and
reciprocal practices. Moreover, as a wholly owned portfolio company and
the sole shareholder of the Adviser Sub, the Adviser Sub and the
Company will generally have aligned interests.
5. Applicant states that the Company will adopt policies and
procedures with respect to the Adviser Sub designed to ensure that the
Company and the Adviser Sub are both being operated and managed in the
best interests of the Company's shareholders and that the ownership by
the Company of the Adviser Sub is consistent with the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.\5\ Applicant states
that the Company and the Adviser Sub will adopt policies and procedures
to address potential conflicts of interest, including but not limited
to policies and procedures that govern the allocation of expenses,
personal securities trading, and insider trading and confidentiality of
proprietary information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Applicant represents that the Adviser Sub's borrowings, if
any, would be used only for its own legitimate business purposes,
and would not be used directly or indirectly by the Company for its
business purposes unrelated to the Adviser Sub, and that the Company
will adopt procedures to ensure Board oversight of compliance with
this representation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Applicant notes that the Company and the Managed Accounts may
invest in the same securities or different securities of the same
issuer to the extent consistent with applicable law, regulatory
guidance, or any exemptive order obtained by the Company. The Company
and the Adviser Sub will implement policies and procedures that will
govern the allocation of investment opportunities when investment
advisory personnel of the Company and/or Adviser Sub become aware of
investment opportunities that may be appropriate for the Company and
one or more Managed Accounts.
7. Applicant asserts that the acquisition by Private Fund Managed
Accounts of participation rights negotiated by the Company would not
trigger the application of section 57(a) because the Private Fund
Managed Accounts are ``downstream'' affiliates of the Company and, as a
result, Applicant notes that rule 57b-1 would apply. Applicant agrees
that, to the extent the Company's compliance personnel believes a
conflict arises out of the sharing of information obtained due to
ownership by the Company, on the one hand, and a Managed Account, on
the other hand, of different instruments issued by the same issuer, an
information wall will be put into place limiting the flow of
information between the Company and the applicable Managed Account (and
the Adviser Sub as its manager).
8. Applicant states that the Company's proposal to enter into the
advisory business through a wholly owned and controlled portfolio
company will benefit the Company's shareholders by: (a) allowing them
to share in the profits from the new advisory business; (b) allowing
that advisory business to be more marketable than if the services were
provided by the Company itself; and (c) limiting any potential
liabilities arising from Adviser
[[Page 69375]]
Sub's provision of advisory services. In addition, the growth in the
Company's advisory business through the Adviser Sub will enable the
Company to add advisory personnel that it could not on its own, such as
additional portfolio managers and investment analysts, who will be
available to provide advisory services both to the Company and to the
Managed Accounts of the Adviser Sub and further enhance the experience
and relationships of the Company's investment team. Without the growth
of the Company's advisory business through the Adviser Sub, the Company
would not have the ability to support such additional advisory
personnel. Applicant also states that the Adviser Sub's organization as
a wholly owned portfolio company of the Company and registration as an
investment adviser would permit the Adviser Sub to operate the business
of managing the Managed Accounts as a direct or an indirect wholly
owned taxable portfolio company of the Company, thereby protecting the
Company's RIC status.
9. Applicant represents that the Company's Board, including a
majority of the disinterested directors, found that the Company
organizing, acquiring, and wholly owning 100% of the equity interest in
the Adviser Sub subsequent to its registration as an investment adviser
is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Applicant
agrees that the Board will review at least annually the investment
advisory business of the Adviser Sub to determine whether such business
should be continued and whether the benefits derived by the Company
from the Adviser Sub's business warrant the continued ownership of the
Adviser Sub. Applicant states that shareholders of the Company will be
provided with notice, in advance of, or concurrent with, the Adviser
Sub's start of investment advisory activities.
10. Accordingly, Applicant represents that the requested relief is
both necessary and appropriate in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by
the policy and provisions of the Act.
Applicant's Conditions:
Applicant agrees that the Order of the Commission granting the
requested relief shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. The determination to enter into the advisory business through
the Adviser Sub has been made by a vote of at least a majority of the
Board who are not ``interested persons'' of the Company as defined in
section 2(a)(19).
2. The Company will wholly own and control the Adviser Sub. The
Company will not have an investment adviser within the meaning of
section 2(a)(20). Only persons acting in their capacities as directors,
officers or employees of the Company will provide advisory services to
the Company.
3. In each of its annual reports to shareholders and in future
registration statements, the Company will discuss the existence of the
Adviser Sub and the provision by the Adviser Sub of outside advisory
services as well as include an assessment of whatever risks, if any,
are associated with the existence of the Adviser Sub and its provision
of such services.
4. The Adviser Sub will not make any proprietary investment that
the Company would be prohibited from making directly under the
Company's investment objectives, policies and restrictions or under any
applicable law.
5. In assessing compliance with the asset coverage requirements
under section 18 of the Act, the Company will deem the assets,
liabilities, and indebtedness of the Adviser Sub as its own.
6. The Board will review at least annually the investment advisory
business of the Adviser Sub to determine whether such business should
be continued and whether the benefits derived by the Company from the
Adviser Sub's business warrant the continued ownership of the Adviser
Sub and, if appropriate, approve (by a vote of at least a majority of
its directors who are not ``interested persons'' as defined in the Act)
at least annually such continuation. In determining whether the
investment advisory business of the Adviser Sub should be continued and
whether the benefits derived by the Company from the Adviser Sub's
business warrant the continued ownership of the Adviser Sub, the Board
will take into consideration, among other things, the following: (a)
the compensation of the officers of the Company and of the Adviser Sub;
(b) all investments by and investment opportunities considered for the
Company that relate to any investments by or investment opportunities
considered for a client of the Adviser Sub; and (c) the allocation of
expenses associated with the provision of advisory services between the
Company and the Adviser Sub.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Such expenses may include: administration and operating
expenses; investment research expenses; sales and marketing
expenses; office space and general expenses; and direct expenses,
including legal and audit fees, directors' fees and taxes.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
under delegated authority.
Dated: November 15, 2022.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-25224 Filed 11-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P