Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 17Ab2-2, 69378-69379 [2022-25102]
Download as PDF
69378
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2022 / Notices
currently offered by other equities
exchanges. The Commission believes
that waiver of the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest
because the proposal does not raise any
new or novel issues. Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not
redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2022–76 and
should be submitted on or before
December 9, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–25230 Filed 11–17–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2022–76 on the subject
line.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2022–76. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
15 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Nov 17, 2022
Jkt 259001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–617, OMB Control No.
3235–0728]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Extension: Rule
17Ab2–2
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of
extension of the previously approved
collection of information provided for in
Rule 17Ab2–2 (17 CFR 240.17Ab2–2)
under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
Exchange Act Rule 17Ab2–2
establishes procedures for the
Commission to make a determination,
either of its own initiative or upon
application by any clearing agency or
member of a clearing agency, whether a
16
PO 00000
17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
covered clearing agency is systemically
important in multiple jurisdictions and
procedures to determine, if the
Commission deems appropriate,
whether any of the activities of a
clearing agency providing central
counterparty services, in addition to
clearing agencies registered with the
Commission for the purpose of clearing
security-based swaps, have a more
complex risk profile. In addition,
Exchange Act Rule 17Ab2–2 provides a
procedure for the Commission to
determine whether to rescind any such
determinations previously made by the
Commission.
Because determinations made by the
Commission pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 17Ab2–2 may be made upon the
request of a clearing agency, respondent
clearing agencies would have the
burden of preparing such requests for
submission to the Commission.
Commission staff estimates that Rule
17Ab2–2 will impose a PRA burden on
registered clearing agencies that seek a
determination from the Commission
regarding the covered clearing agency’s
status as systemically important in
multiple jurisdictions. Commission staff
estimates that two registered clearing
agencies or their members on their
behalf will apply for a Commission
determination, or may be subject to a
Commission-initiated determination,
regarding whether a registered clearing
agency is involved in activities with a
more complex risk profile or whether a
covered clearing agency is systemically
important in multiple jurisdictions.
Commission staff estimates that each
respondent clearing agency incurs a
one-time burden of 10 hours and a onetime cost of $2,000 to draft and review
a determination request submitted to the
Commission, for a total of 20 hours and
$4,000 for all respondents. The total
annualized burden and cost for all
respondents are 6.66 hours and
$1,333.33.
Any agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a valid
OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website:
>www.reginfo.gov<. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent by
December 19, 2022 to (i)
>MBX.OMB.OIRA.SEC_desk_officer@
omb.eop.gov< and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer,
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2022 / Notices
Securities and Exchange Commission, c/
o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an
email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: November 14, 2022.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–25102 Filed 11–17–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–793, OMB Control No.
3235–0734]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Extension: Rule
22c–1
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission Office of FOIA Services
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
Rule 22c–1 (17 CFR 270.22c–1) under
the Investment Company Act of 1940
(15 U.S.C. 80a) (the ‘‘Investment
Company Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’) enables a fund
to choose to use ‘‘swing pricing’’ as a
tool to mitigate shareholder dilution.
Rule 22c–1 is intended to promote
investor protection by providing funds
with an additional tool to mitigate the
potentially dilutive effects of
shareholder purchase or redemption
activity and a set of operational
standards that allow funds to gain
comfort using swing pricing as a means
of mitigating potential dilution.
The respondents to amended rule
22c–1 are open-end management
investment companies (other than
money market funds or exchange-traded
funds) that engage in swing pricing.
Compliance with rule 22c–1(a)(3) is
mandatory for any fund that chooses to
use swing pricing to adjust its NAV in
reliance on the rule.
While we are not aware of any funds
that have engaged in swing pricing,1 we
are estimating for the purpose of this
analysis that 5 fund complexes have
funds that may adopt swing pricing
policies and procedures in the future
pursuant to the rule. We estimate that
1 No funds have engaged in swing pricing as
reported on Form N–CEN as of August 15, 2022.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Nov 17, 2022
Jkt 259001
the total burden associated with the
preparation and approval of swing
pricing policies and procedures by those
fund complexes that would use swing
pricing will be 280 hours.2 We also
estimate that it will cost a fund complex
$48,188 to document, review and
initially approve these policies and
procedures, for a total cost of $240,940.3
Rule 22c–1 requires a fund that uses
swing pricing to maintain the fund’s
swing policies and procedures that are
in effect, or at any time within the past
six years were in effect, in an easily
accessible place.4 The rule also requires
a fund to retain a written copy of the
periodic report provided to the board
prepared by the swing pricing
administrator that describes, among
other things, the swing pricing
administrator’s review of the adequacy
of the fund’s swing pricing policies and
procedures and the effectiveness of their
implementation, including the impact
on mitigating dilution and any backtesting performed.5 The retention of
these records is necessary to allow the
staff during examinations of funds to
determine whether a fund is in
compliance with its swing pricing
policies and procedures and with rule
22c–1. We estimate a time cost per fund
complex of $344.6 We estimate that the
total for recordkeeping related to swing
pricing will be 20 hours, at an aggregate
cost of $1,720, for all fund complexes
that we believe include funds that have
adopted swing pricing policies and
procedures.7
2 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: (48 + 2 + 6) hours × 5 fund complexes
= 280 hours.
3 These estimates are based on the following
calculations: 24 hours × $237 (hourly rate for a
senior accountant) = $5,688; 24 hours × $545
(blended hourly rate for assistant general counsel
($510) and chief compliance officer ($580)) =
$13,080; 2 hours (for a fund attorney’s time to
prepare materials for the board’s determinations) ×
$400 (hourly rate for a compliance attorney) = $800;
6 hours× $4,770 (hourly rate for a board of 9
directors) = $28,620; ($5,688 + $13,080 +$800 +
$28,620) = $48,188; $48,188 × 5 fund complexes =
$240,940. The hourly wages used are from SIFMA’s
Management & Professional Earnings in the
Securities Industry 2013, modified by Commission
staff to account for an 1800-hour work-year and
inflation, and multiplied by 5.35 to account for
bonuses, firm size, employee benefits, and
overhead. The staff has estimated the average cost
of board of director time as $4,770 per hour for the
board as a whole, based on information received
from funds and their counsel.
4 See rule 22c–1(a)(3)(iii).
5 See id.
6 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: 2 hours × $68 (hourly rate for a general
clerk) = $136; 2 hours × $104 (hourly rate for a
senior computer operator) = $208. $136 + $208 =
$344.
7 These estimates are based on the following
calculations: 4 hours × 5 fund complexes = 20
hours. 5 fund complexes ×$344 = $1,720.
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69379
Amortized over a three-year period,
we believe that the hour burdens and
time costs associated with rule 22c–1,
including the burden associated with
the requirements that funds adopt
policies and procedures, obtain board
approval, and periodic review of an
annual written report from the swing
pricing administrator, and retain certain
records and written reports related to
swing pricing, will result in an average
aggregate annual burden of 113.3 hours,
and average aggregate time costs of
$82,033.8 We also estimate that rule
22c–1 imposes a total external cost
burden of $2,655 for outside legal
services related to compliance with the
policies and procedures requirement.9
These estimates of average costs are
made solely for the purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate
is not derived from a comprehensive or
even a representative survey or study of
the costs of Commission rules.
This collection of information is
necessary to obtain a benefit and will
not be kept confidential. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website:
www.reginfo.gov. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice by December 19, 2022 to (i)
MBX.OMB.OIRA.SEC_desk_officer@
omb.eop.gov and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer,
Securities and Exchange Commission, c/
o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an
email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: November 14, 2022.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–25099 Filed 11–17–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
8 These estimates are based on the following
calculations: (280 hours (year 1) + (3 ×20 hours)
(years 1, 2 and 3)) ÷ 3 = 113.3 hours; ($240,940 (year
1) + (3 × $1,720) (years 1, 2 and 3)) ÷ 3 = $82,033.
9 This estimated burden is based on the estimated
wage rate of $531 per hour for outside legal services
and the following calculation: $531 × 5 fund
complexes = $2,655.
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 222 (Friday, November 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69378-69379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25102]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270-617, OMB Control No. 3235-0728]
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule
17Ab2-2
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule
17Ab2-2 (17 CFR 240.17Ab2-2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
Exchange Act Rule 17Ab2-2 establishes procedures for the Commission
to make a determination, either of its own initiative or upon
application by any clearing agency or member of a clearing agency,
whether a covered clearing agency is systemically important in multiple
jurisdictions and procedures to determine, if the Commission deems
appropriate, whether any of the activities of a clearing agency
providing central counterparty services, in addition to clearing
agencies registered with the Commission for the purpose of clearing
security-based swaps, have a more complex risk profile. In addition,
Exchange Act Rule 17Ab2-2 provides a procedure for the Commission to
determine whether to rescind any such determinations previously made by
the Commission.
Because determinations made by the Commission pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 17Ab2-2 may be made upon the request of a clearing agency,
respondent clearing agencies would have the burden of preparing such
requests for submission to the Commission.
Commission staff estimates that Rule 17Ab2-2 will impose a PRA
burden on registered clearing agencies that seek a determination from
the Commission regarding the covered clearing agency's status as
systemically important in multiple jurisdictions. Commission staff
estimates that two registered clearing agencies or their members on
their behalf will apply for a Commission determination, or may be
subject to a Commission-initiated determination, regarding whether a
registered clearing agency is involved in activities with a more
complex risk profile or whether a covered clearing agency is
systemically important in multiple jurisdictions.
Commission staff estimates that each respondent clearing agency
incurs a one-time burden of 10 hours and a one-time cost of $2,000 to
draft and review a determination request submitted to the Commission,
for a total of 20 hours and $4,000 for all respondents. The total
annualized burden and cost for all respondents are 6.66 hours and
$1,333.33.
Any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a valid OMB control number.
The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: >www.reginfo.gov<. Find this
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent by December 19, 2022 to (i)
>[email protected]< and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer,
[[Page 69379]]
Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an email to: [email protected].
Dated: November 14, 2022.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-25102 Filed 11-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P