Glycine From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 67870-67872 [2022-24604]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
67870
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 217 / Thursday, November 10, 2022 / Notices
Paper Products Marketing (USA) Inc.3
No interested parties submitted case
briefs.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this Order
includes uncoated paper in sheet form;
weighing at least 40 grams per square
meter but not more than 150 grams per
square meter; that either is a white
paper with a GE brightness level 4 of 85
or higher or is a colored paper; whether
or not surface-decorated, printed (except
as described below), embossed,
perforated, or punched; irrespective of
the smoothness of the surface; and
irrespective of dimensions (Certain
Uncoated Paper).
Certain Uncoated Paper includes (a)
uncoated free sheet paper that meets
this scope definition; (b) uncoated
ground wood paper produced from
bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical
pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope
definition; and (c) any other uncoated
paper that meets this scope definition
regardless of the type of pulp used to
produce the paper.
Specifically excluded from the scope
are (1) paper printed with final content
of printed text or graphics and (2) lined
paper products, typically school
supplies, composed of paper that
incorporates straight horizontal and/or
vertical lines that would make the paper
unsuitable for copying or printing
purposes. For purposes of this scope
definition, paper shall be considered
‘‘printed with final content’’ where at
least one side of the sheet has printed
text and/or graphics that cover at least
five percent of the surface area of the
entire sheet.
On September 1, 2017, Commerce
determined that imports of uncoated
paper with a GE brightness of 83 +/
¥1% (83 Bright paper), otherwise
meeting the description of in-scope
merchandise, constitute merchandise
‘‘altered in form or appearance in minor
respects’’ from in-scope merchandise
that are subject to this Order.5
3 See Memoranda, ‘‘Verification of Paper
Australia Pty. Ltd.’s Responses,’’ dated September
21, 2022; and ‘‘Verification of Paper Products
Marketing (USA) Inc.,’’ dated September 21, 2022.
4 One of the key measurements of any grade of
paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter
the paper the better the contrast between the paper
and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE
Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of
light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest
reflection, or what would be given to a totally black
grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade.
‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition
means a paper with a hue other than white that
reflects one of the primary colors of magenta,
yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a
combination of such primary colors.
5 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia,
Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Nov 09, 2022
Jkt 259001
Imports of the subject merchandise
are provided for under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000,
4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000,
4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000,
4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040,
4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000,
4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some
imports of subject merchandise may
also be classified under 4802.62.1000,
4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000,
4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020,
4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000,
4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000,
4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
Order is dispositive.
Merchandise Subject to the
Circumvention Inquiry
This circumvention inquiry covers
certain uncoated paper rolls that are
commonly, but not exclusively, known
as ‘‘sheeter rolls,’’ from Australia that
are further processed in the United
States into individual sheets of
uncoated paper that would otherwise be
subject to the Order (i.e., paper that
weighs at least 40 grams per square
meter but not more than 150 grams per
square meter; and that either is a white
paper with a GE brightness level of 83
+/¥1% or higher or is a colored paper
(as defined above)). The uncoated paper
rolls covered by this inquiry are able to
be converted into sheets of uncoated
paper using specialized cutting
machinery prior to printing, and are
typically, but not exclusively, between
52 and 103 inches wide and 50 inches
in diameter. The paper rolls covered by
this inquiry are classified under HTSUS
subheading 4802.55.
Therefore, these exports to the United
States of uncoated paper rolls from
Australia are not circumventing the
Order.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice will serve as the only
reminder to all parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with section
781(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(g).
Dated: November 4, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022–24605 Filed 11–9–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–883]
Glycine From India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2020–2021
Final Determination
We determine that the uncoated paper
rolls from Australia that are subject to
this inquiry are not being completed by
conversion in the United States into
sheets of uncoated paper that would
otherwise be subject to the Order.
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that
producers or exporters subject to this
administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise below normal
value during the period of review June
1, 2020, through May 31, 2021.
DATES: Applicable November 10, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Bradshaw or Yang Jin Chun, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3896 or (202) 482–5760,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and Portugal: Affirmative Final Determination of
Circumvention of the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 41610
(September 1, 2017).
6 See Preliminary Results PDM for a full
description of the methodology.
Background
On July 7, 2022, Commerce published
the Preliminary Results of the 2020–
2021 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on glycine from
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
circumvention inquiry in accordance
with section 781(a) of the Act.6 We have
continued to apply this methodology,
and incorporate by reference this
description of the methodology, for our
final determination.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 217 / Thursday, November 10, 2022 / Notices
market economy investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for
companies which were not selected for
individual examination in an
administrative review.
In this administrative review, we have
calculated a weighted-average dumping
margin for the mandatory respondent
Avid Organics Private Limited that is
not zero, de minimis, or based entirely
on facts available (i.e., 15.17 percent).
Accordingly, we have assigned this rate
to Paras Intermediates Private Limited,
the sole respondent not selected for
individual examination in this
administrative review.4
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).6
Where either a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de
minimis, or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.7 For entries of
Scope of the Order
subject merchandise during the period
The merchandise subject to the order
of review produced by any of these
is glycine. For a complete description of
companies for which it did not know its
the scope of this order, see the Issues
merchandise was destined for the
and Decision Memorandum.3
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the all-others
Analysis of Comments Received
rate if there is no rate for the
All issues raised in the case and
intermediate company(ies) involved in
rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties
the transaction.8
Final Results of Review
in this administrative review are
Commerce intends to issue
addressed in the Issues and Decision
We determine that the following
assessment instructions to CBP no
Memorandum. A list of the issues
estimated weighted-average dumping
earlier than 35 days after the date of
addressed in the Issues and Decision
margins exist for the period of review
publication of the final results of this
Memorandum is attached to this notice
June 1, 2020, through May 31, 2021.
administrative review in the Federal
as an appendix. The Issues and Decision
Register. If a timely summons is filed at
Memorandum is a public document and
Weighted- the U.S. Court of International Trade,
is on file electronically via Enforcement
average
the assessment instructions will direct
Producer/
dumping
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
exporter
CBP not to liquidate relevant entries
margin
Countervailing Duty Centralized
until the time for parties to file a request
(percent)
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
for a statutory injunction has expired
ACCESS is available to registered users
Avid Organics Private Limited ....
15.17 (i.e., within 90 days of publication). The
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a Kumar Industries/Rudraa Interfinal results of this administrative
national 5 ..................................
25.66
complete version of the Issues and
review shall be the basis for the
Paras
Intermediates
Private
LimDecision Memorandum can be accessed
ited ...........................................
15.17 assessment of antidumping duties on
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
entries of merchandise under review
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
and for future cash deposits of estimated
Disclosure
antidumping duties, where applicable.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Commerce intends to disclose its
Based on a review of the record and
Cash Deposit Requirements
calculations and analysis performed to
our analysis of the comments received
interested parties in the final results of
The following cash deposit
from interested parties regarding our
this administrative review within five
requirements will be effective upon
Preliminary Results, and for the reasons days of any public announcement or, if
publication in the Federal Register of
explained in the Issues and Decision
there is no public announcement,
the notice of these final results of
Memorandum, we made changes to the
within five days of the date of
administrative review for all shipments
surrogate constructed value profit and
publication of this notice, in accordance of glycine from India entered, or
selling expense ratio calculations for the with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
withdrawn from warehouse, for
final results of this administrative
consumption on or after the date of
Assessment Rates
review.
publication as provided by section
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit
Rate for Non-Selected Respondent
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
rate for companies subject to this review
The statute and Commerce’s
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
will be equal to the company-specific
regulations do not address the
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
weighted-average dumping margin
establishment of a rate to be applied to
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
established in the final results of the
companies not selected for examination
appropriate entries of subject
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
when Commerce limits its examination
merchandise in accordance with the
a company not covered in this review
in an administrative review pursuant to
final results of this administrative
but covered in a prior segment of the
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally,
review. For any individually examined
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
respondent whose weighted-average
continue to be the company-specific rate
the Act, which provides instructions for
dumping margin is above de minimis
published in the completed segment for
calculating the all-others rate in a
(i.e., 0.50 percent), we will calculate
the most recent period; (3) if the
importer-specific assessment rates on
exporter is not a firm covered in this
1 See Glycine from India: Preliminary Results and
the basis of the ratio of the total amount
Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty
6 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
of antidumping duties calculated for
Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 87 FR 40507
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
(July 7, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and
each importer’s examined sales and the
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
total entered value of the sales, in
2
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103
India.1 For a complete description of the
events that followed the Preliminary
Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2 Commerce conducted
this administrative review in
accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
67871
See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: Issues
and Decision Memorandum for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020–
2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
3 Id. at 2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Nov 09, 2022
Jkt 259001
4 See
Preliminary Results, 87 FR 40508.
5 We continue to treat Kumar Industries and
Rudraa International as a collapsed single entity for
the final results of this administrative review. Id.,
87 FR 40507–08, n.6.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(February 14, 2012).
7 Id., 77 FR at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2).
8 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
67872
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 217 / Thursday, November 10, 2022 / Notices
review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established in the completed segment
for the most recent period for the
producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters will continue to be 7.23
percent, the all-others rate established
in the investigation of sales at less than
fair value, adjusted for the exportsubsidy rate in the companion
countervailing duty investigation.9
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount
of antidumping duties by the amount of
the countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221.
9 See
Glycine from India and Japan: Amended
Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination
and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170, 29171
(June 21, 2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Nov 09, 2022
Jkt 259001
Dated: November 4, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse
Facts Available (AFA)
Comment 2: Selection of the AFA Rate
Comment 3: Voluntary Respondent
Request
Comment 4: Selection of Surrogate
Financial Information
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022–24604 Filed 11–9–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–301–803]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From Colombia: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2020–2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric
acid) from Colombia was sold in the
United States at prices below normal
value during the period of review (POR)
July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021.
DATES: Applicable November 10, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Lindgren, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482–1671.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 22, 2022, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results.1
Subsequently, on August 22, 2022, we
received one case brief from Archer
Daniels Midland Company, Cargill,
Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle
Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively,
the petitioners).2 No additional
1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Colombia: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 87 FR
43786 (July 22, 2022) (Preliminary Results).
2 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Petitioners’ Case Brief,’’
dated August 22, 2022.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comments were submitted. This review
covers one producer/exporter of the
subject merchandise, Sucroal S.A.
(Sucroal). Commerce conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order 3
The product covered by the Order is
citric acid from Colombia. For a
complete description of the scope, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case brief are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The issue that the
petitioners raised and to which we
responded in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached at the
appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, and for the reasons
explained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, we made one change to
the preliminary weighted-average
dumping margin calculations for
Sucroal.5
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
Commerce determines that the
following weighted-average dumping
margin exists for the period July 1, 2020,
through June 30, 2021:
Producer/exporter
Sucroal S.A ...........................
Estimated
weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
3.58
3 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Sales from
Belgium, Colombia and Thailand: Antidumping
Duty Orders, 83 FR 35214 (July 25, 2018) (Order).
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Citric Acid and Certain
Citrate Salts from Colombia: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2021,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
5 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 3.
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67870-67872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24604]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-883]
Glycine From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2020-2021
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that
producers or exporters subject to this administrative review made sales
of subject merchandise below normal value during the period of review
June 1, 2020, through May 31, 2021.
DATES: Applicable November 10, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Bradshaw or Yang Jin Chun, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3896 or (202)
482-5760, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 7, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the
2020-2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
glycine from
[[Page 67871]]
India.\1\ For a complete description of the events that followed the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Glycine from India: Preliminary Results and Rescission,
in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 87 FR
40507 (July 7, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Glycine from India: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2020-2021,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is glycine. For a complete
description of the scope of this order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by
interested parties in this administrative review are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an
appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and our analysis of the comments
received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and
for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we
made changes to the surrogate constructed value profit and selling
expense ratio calculations for the final results of this administrative
review.
Rate for Non-Selected Respondent
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for
examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative
review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce
looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not
selected for individual examination in an administrative review.
In this administrative review, we have calculated a weighted-
average dumping margin for the mandatory respondent Avid Organics
Private Limited that is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
facts available (i.e., 15.17 percent). Accordingly, we have assigned
this rate to Paras Intermediates Private Limited, the sole respondent
not selected for individual examination in this administrative
review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Results, 87 FR 40508.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following estimated weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period of review June 1, 2020, through May 31,
2021.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/ exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avid Organics Private Limited................................ 15.17
Kumar Industries/Rudraa International \5\.................... 25.66
Paras Intermediates Private Limited.......................... 15.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ We continue to treat Kumar Industries and Rudraa
International as a collapsed single entity for the final results of
this administrative review. Id., 87 FR 40507-08, n.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis
performed to interested parties in the final results of this
administrative review within five days of any public announcement or,
if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of
publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this administrative review. For any individually examined respondent
whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50
percent), we will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated
for each importer's examined sales and the total entered value of the
sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\6\ Where either a
respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or
an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.\7\ For entries of subject merchandise during the
period of review produced by any of these companies for which it did
not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there
is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the
transaction.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14,
2012).
\7\ Id., 77 FR at 8102-03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
\8\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
administrative review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). The final results of
this administrative review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise under review and for
future cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties, where applicable.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of the notice of these final
results of administrative review for all shipments of glycine from
India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act:
(1) the cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be
equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of the review; (2) for merchandise
exported by a company not covered in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published in the completed segment for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
[[Page 67872]]
review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the producer
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the completed
segment for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise;
(4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will
continue to be 7.23 percent, the all-others rate established in the
investigation of sales at less than fair value, adjusted for the
export-subsidy rate in the companion countervailing duty
investigation.\9\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR
29170, 29171 (June 21, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the
amount of the countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221.
Dated: November 4, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse Facts Available (AFA)
Comment 2: Selection of the AFA Rate
Comment 3: Voluntary Respondent Request
Comment 4: Selection of Surrogate Financial Information
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022-24604 Filed 11-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
