Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020, 66268-66269 [2022-23920]
Download as PDF
66268
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2022 / Notices
Dated: October 27, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is certain preserved
mushrooms, whether imported whole, sliced,
diced, or as stems and pieces. The preserved
mushrooms covered under this investigation
are the genus Agaricus. ‘‘Preserved
mushrooms’’ refer to mushrooms that have
been prepared or preserved by cleaning,
blanching, and sometimes slicing or cutting.
These mushrooms are then packed and heat
sterilized in containers each holding a net
drained weight of not more than 12 ounces
(340.2 grams), including but not limited to
cans or glass jars, in a suitable liquid
medium, including but not limited to water,
brine, butter, or butter sauce. Preserved
mushrooms may be imported whole, sliced,
diced, or as stems and pieces.
Excluded from the scope are ‘‘marinated,’’
‘‘acidified,’’ or ‘‘pickled’’ mushrooms, which
are prepared or preserved by means of
vinegar or acetic acid, but may contain oil or
other additives. To be prepared or preserved
by means of vinegar or acetic acid, the
merchandise must be a minimum 0.5 percent
by weight acetic acid.
The merchandise subject to this
investigation is classifiable under
subheadings 2003.10.0127, 2003.10.0131,
and 2003.10.0137 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The
subject merchandise may also be classified
under HTSUS subheadings 2003.10.0143,
2003.10.0147, and 2003.10.0153. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise under
investigation is dispositive.
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers and/or exporters of large
diameter welded pipe (welded pipe)
from the Republic of Korea (Korea)
received countervailable subsidies
during the period of review (POR),
January 1, 2020, through December 31,
2020.
DATES: Applicable November 3, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis McClure or Jonathan Schueler,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5973 or
(202) 482–9175, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
On June 3, 2022, Commerce published
the Preliminary Results of this
administrative review in the Federal
Register,1 and invited interested parties
to comment. On July 12, 2022, the
Government of Korea (GOK), Hyundai
RB Co., Ltd. (Hyundai RB), and SeAH
Steel Corporation (SeAH Steel)
submitted timely case briefs.2 On July
19, 2022, the American Line Pipe
Producers Association Trade Committee
(the Committee) submitted a timely
rebuttal brief.3 On September 20, 2022,
Commerce extended the deadline for the
final results of this review to no later
than October 28, 2022.4 Commerce held
a public hearing on September 7, 2022.5
For a complete description of the events
that followed the Preliminary Results,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.6 We conducted this
review in accordance with section 751
1 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2020, 87 FR 33715 (June 3,
2022) (Preliminary Results).
2 See GOK’s Letter, ‘‘GOK Case Brief,’’ dated July
12, 2022; see also Hyundai RB’s Letter, ‘‘Hyundai
RB Case Brief,’’ dated July 12, 2022; and SeAH’s
Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated July 12, 2022.
3 See Committee’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated
July 19, 2022.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results,’’ dated September 20, 2022.
5 See Hearing Transcript, ‘‘In the Matter of: the
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Large Diameter Welded Carbon and Alloy
Steel Line and Structural Pipe from the Republic of
Korea,’’ dated September 14, 2022.
Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed
in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Affiliation
V. Application of Facts Available and Use of
Adverse Inference
VI. Discussion of the Methodology
VII. Currency Conversion
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022–23922 Filed 11–2–22; 8:45 am]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
[C–580–898]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 02, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
Scope of the Order 7
The merchandise covered by the
Order is large diameter welded pipe. For
a complete description of the scope of
the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in interested parties’
briefs are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. A list of the
issues addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is included in
the appendix to this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the case and
rebuttal briefs and the evidence on the
record, we made no changes from the
Preliminary Results.
Companies Not Selected for Individual
Review
We made no changes to the
methodology for determining a rate for
companies not selected for individual
examination from the Preliminary
Results. For the final results of this
review, as indicated in the section
below, we have continued to determine
that only the mandatory respondent
Hyundai RB received countervailable
subsidies that are above de minimis.
Therefore, consistent with section
705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we are applying
the net subsidy rate calculated for
Hyundai RB to the non-selected
companies.
Final Results of Administrative Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5), we calculated an
individual net countervailable subsidy
rate for Hyundai RB and SeAH Steel
Corporation. Commerce determines that,
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of
Korea; 2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
7 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the
Republic of Korea: Countervailing Duty Order, 84
FR 18773 (May 2, 2019) (Order).
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
66269
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2022 / Notices
during the POR, the net countervailable
subsidy rates for the producers/
exporters under review are as follows:
Subsidy rate
(percent ad valorem)
Producer/exporter
Hyundai RB Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................
SeAH Steel Corporation 1 ........................................................................................................................................................
1.66
* 0.31
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies
Chang Won Bending Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................
Dong Yang Steel Pipe Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................................
EEW Korea Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................
HiSteel Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................................
1.66
1.66
1.66
1.66
1 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, Commerce has found the following companies to be cross-owned with SeAH Steel
Corporation: SeAH Holdings Corporation and ESAB SeAH Corporation. The subsidy rates apply to all cross-owned companies.
* De minimis.
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with the final
results of review within five days of a
public announcement or, if there is no
public announcement, within five days
of the date of publication of the notice
of final results in the Federal Register,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
However, because we have made no
changes from the Preliminary Results,
there are no calculations to disclose.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2),
Commerce will determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review, for the
above-listed companies at the applicable
ad valorem assessment rates. We intend
to issue assessment instructions to CBP
no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Instructions
In accordance with section 751(a)(1)
of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct
CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties in the
amounts shown for each of the
respective companies listed above based
on shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms subject to the Order, we
will instruct CBP to continue to collect
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 02, 2022
Jkt 259001
cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties at the most recent
company-specific rate or the all-others
rate (9.29 percent), as appropriate.8
These cash deposit requirements,
effective upon publication of these final
results, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to an administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: October 28, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Discussion of the Comments
Comment 1: Whether the Demand
Response Resources (DRR) Program Is
Countervailable
Comment 2: Whether Restriction of Special
Taxation Act (RSTA) Article 7 Is De Jure
Specific
8 See
PO 00000
Order, 84 FR 18775.
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comment 3: Whether Certain Programs Are
De Facto Specific
Comment 4: Whether the Energy Storage
Systems (ESS) Program Is Specific
Comment 5: Whether to Allocate Benefits
from the Process Quality Technology
Development Project to the POR
Comment 6: Whether the Employment
Security Improvement (ESI) Program Is
Countervailable
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022–23920 Filed 11–2–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–357–825]
White Grape Juice Concentrate From
Argentina: Preliminary Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, Postponement of Final
Determination, and Extension of
Provisional Measures
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that white grape juice
concentrate (WGJC) from Argentina is
being, or is likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(LTFV). The period of investigation
(POI) is January 1, 2021, through
December 31, 2021. Interested parties
are invited to comment on this
preliminary determination.
DATES: Applicable November 3, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Myrna Lobo or Jacob Saude, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2371 or (202) 482–0981,
respectively.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66268-66269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23920]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-580-898]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers and/or exporters of large diameter welded pipe (welded pipe)
from the Republic of Korea (Korea) received countervailable subsidies
during the period of review (POR), January 1, 2020, through December
31, 2020.
DATES: Applicable November 3, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis McClure or Jonathan Schueler,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5973
or (202) 482-9175, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 3, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this
administrative review in the Federal Register,\1\ and invited
interested parties to comment. On July 12, 2022, the Government of
Korea (GOK), Hyundai RB Co., Ltd. (Hyundai RB), and SeAH Steel
Corporation (SeAH Steel) submitted timely case briefs.\2\ On July 19,
2022, the American Line Pipe Producers Association Trade Committee (the
Committee) submitted a timely rebuttal brief.\3\ On September 20, 2022,
Commerce extended the deadline for the final results of this review to
no later than October 28, 2022.\4\ Commerce held a public hearing on
September 7, 2022.\5\ For a complete description of the events that
followed the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\6\ We conducted this review in accordance with section 751
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2020, 87 FR 33715 (June 3, 2022)
(Preliminary Results).
\2\ See GOK's Letter, ``GOK Case Brief,'' dated July 12, 2022;
see also Hyundai RB's Letter, ``Hyundai RB Case Brief,'' dated July
12, 2022; and SeAH's Letter, ``Case Brief,'' dated July 12, 2022.
\3\ See Committee's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief,'' dated July 19,
2022.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results,''
dated September 20, 2022.
\5\ See Hearing Transcript, ``In the Matter of: the
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large
Diameter Welded Carbon and Alloy Steel Line and Structural Pipe from
the Republic of Korea,'' dated September 14, 2022.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Korea; 2020,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Korea:
Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 18773 (May 2, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by the Order is large diameter welded pipe.
For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in interested parties' briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included in the appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the case and rebuttal briefs and the
evidence on the record, we made no changes from the Preliminary
Results.
Companies Not Selected for Individual Review
We made no changes to the methodology for determining a rate for
companies not selected for individual examination from the Preliminary
Results. For the final results of this review, as indicated in the
section below, we have continued to determine that only the mandatory
respondent Hyundai RB received countervailable subsidies that are above
de minimis. Therefore, consistent with section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act,
we are applying the net subsidy rate calculated for Hyundai RB to the
non-selected companies.
Final Results of Administrative Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we calculated an
individual net countervailable subsidy rate for Hyundai RB and SeAH
Steel Corporation. Commerce determines that,
[[Page 66269]]
during the POR, the net countervailable subsidy rates for the
producers/exporters under review are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Producer/exporter (percent ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyundai RB Co., Ltd............................... 1.66
SeAH Steel Corporation \1\........................ * 0.31
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chang Won Bending Co., Ltd........................ 1.66
Dong Yang Steel Pipe Co., Ltd..................... 1.66
EEW Korea Co., Ltd................................ 1.66
HiSteel Co., Ltd.................................. 1.66
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, Commerce has
found the following companies to be cross-owned with SeAH Steel
Corporation: SeAH Holdings Corporation and ESAB SeAH Corporation. The
subsidy rates apply to all cross-owned companies.
* De minimis.
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with the final results of review within five
days of a public announcement or, if there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of publication of the notice of final
results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
However, because we have made no changes from the Preliminary Results,
there are no calculations to disclose.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce will determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties
on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with
the final results of this review, for the above-listed companies at the
applicable ad valorem assessment rates. We intend to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Instructions
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends
to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing
duties in the amounts shown for each of the respective companies listed
above based on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of
the final results of this administrative review. For all non-reviewed
firms subject to the Order, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent
company-specific rate or the all-others rate (9.29 percent), as
appropriate.\8\ These cash deposit requirements, effective upon
publication of these final results, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Order, 84 FR 18775.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: October 28, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Discussion of the Comments
Comment 1: Whether the Demand Response Resources (DRR) Program
Is Countervailable
Comment 2: Whether Restriction of Special Taxation Act (RSTA)
Article 7 Is De Jure Specific
Comment 3: Whether Certain Programs Are De Facto Specific
Comment 4: Whether the Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program Is
Specific
Comment 5: Whether to Allocate Benefits from the Process Quality
Technology Development Project to the POR
Comment 6: Whether the Employment Security Improvement (ESI)
Program Is Countervailable
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022-23920 Filed 11-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P