Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 7 in Connection With a Technology Migration, 65105-65108 [2022-23354]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2022 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–96120; File No. SR–MRX–
2022–21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Options 7 in
Connection With a Technology
Migration
October 21, 2022.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
12, 2022, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
MRX’s Pricing Schedule at Options 7.3
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/mrx/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed
pricing changes on September 30, 2022 as SR–
MRX–2022–17. On October 12, 2022, the instant
filing replaced SR–MRX–2022–17.
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 26, 2022
Jkt 259001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
MRX proposes to amend its Pricing
Schedule at Options 7. Specifically,
MRX proposes to: (1) add the defined
term ‘‘Exposed Order’’ within Options
7, section 1(c); and (2) amend Options
7, section 6 to offer certain free ports in
connection with an upcoming
technology migration. Each change is
described below.
Options 7, Section 1
The Exchange proposes to define an
Exposed Order for purposes of pricing
within Options 7. The Exchange
introduced the concept of an
‘‘exposure’’ in a recent rule change
amending MRX’s routing rules.4 In that
rule change, the Exchange noted that for
purposes of MRX’s Options 5, section 4
routing rule, ‘‘exposure’’ or ‘‘exposing’’
an order means a notification sent to
Members with the price, size, and side
of interest that is available for
execution.5 The order exposure will
apply to both routed orders and nonrouted or ‘‘DNR Orders.’’ The order
exposure process permits the Exchange
to apply a Route Timer 6 prior to the
initial and subsequent routing of an
order and allows routing of the order
after exposure occurs (during open
trading) every time an order becomes
marketable against the ABBO.7
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94897
(May 12, 2022), 87 FR 30294 (May 18, 2022) (SR–
ISE–2022–11) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Routing Functionality in Connection With a
Technology Migration). MRX’s Options 5 rules are
incorporated by reference to Nasdaq ISE, LLC
Options 5 rules. This rule change was done in
connection with a technology migration. SR–ISE–
2022–11 will become operative for MRX prior to
December 23, 2022. The Exchange proposes to
announce the exact date when it will commence a
limited symbol migration in an Options Trader
Alert.
5 See MRX Options 5, section 4(a) which is
effective but not yet operative. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 94897 (May 12, 2022), 87
FR 30294 (May 18, 2022) (SR–ISE–2022–11) (Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Routing Functionality in
Connection With a Technology Migration).
6 For purposes of Options 5, section 4, a Route
Timer shall not exceed one second and shall begin
at the time orders are accepted into the System, and
the System will consider whether an order can be
routed at the conclusion of each Route Timer.
7 See MRX Options 5, section 4 which is effective
but not yet operative. See also Securities Exchange
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65105
At this time, the Exchange proposes to
amend Options 7, section 1(c) to provide, An
‘‘Exposed Order’’ is an order that is broadcast
via an order exposure alert as described
within Options 5, section 4 (Order Routing).
Unless otherwise noted in Options 7, section
3 pricing, Exposed Orders will be assessed
the applicable ‘‘Taker’’ Fee and any order or
quote that executes against an Exposed Order
during a Route Timer will be paid/assessed
the applicable ‘‘Maker’’ Rebate/Fee.
As proposed, the defined term would
apply a Taker Fee, where applicable, to
an executed Exposed Order. If an order
or quote allocates against the Exposed
Order during the Route Timer described
within Options 5, section 4, the
Exchange would pay/assess the
applicable Maker Rebate and/or Maker
Fee. The Exchange believes that its
proposal should provide increased
opportunities for participation in
executions on the Exchange, facilitating
the ability of the Exchange to bring
together participants and encourage
more robust competition for orders.
Options 7, Section 6
In connection with a technology
migration,8 Members may request new
FIX Ports,9 SQF Ports,10 SQF Purge
Act Release No. 94897 (May 12, 2022), 87 FR 30294
(May 18, 2022) (SR–ISE–2022–11) (Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Routing Functionality in
Connection With a Technology Migration).
8 MRX is migrating its technology to an enhanced
Nasdaq, Inc. functionality which results in higher
performance, scalability, and more robust
architecture. The technology migration would
commence in November 2022.
9 ‘‘Financial Information eXchange’’ or ‘‘FIX’’ is
an interface that allows Members and their
Sponsored Customers to connect, send, and receive
messages related to orders and auction orders to the
Exchange. Features include the following: (1)
execution messages; (2) order messages; (3) risk
protection triggers and cancel notifications; and (4)
post trade allocation messages. See Supplementary
Material .03(a) to Options 3, section 7.
10 ‘‘Specialized Quote Feed’’ or ‘‘SQF’’ is an
interface that allows Market Makers to connect,
send, and receive messages related to quotes,
Immediate-or-Cancel Orders, and auction responses
to the Exchange. Features include the following: (1)
options symbol directory messages (e.g., underlying
and complex instruments); (2) system event
messages (e.g., start of trading hours messages and
start of opening); (3) trading action messages (e.g.,
halts and resumes); (4) execution messages; (5)
quote messages; (6) Immediate-or-Cancel Order
messages; (7) risk protection triggers and purge
notifications; (8) opening imbalance messages; (9)
auction notifications; and (10) auction responses.
The SQF Purge Interface only receives and notifies
of purge requests from the Market Maker. Market
Makers may only enter interest into SQF in their
assigned options series. See Supplementary
Material .03(c) to Options 3, section 7.
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
65106
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2022 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Ports,11 OTTO Ports,12 CTI Ports,13 and
FIX DROP Ports,14 at no additional cost,
from November 1, 2022 through
December 30, 2022 (‘‘Transition
Period’’) which are duplicative of the
type and quantity of their legacy ports.
These second set of new ports would
allow Members time to test ports to the
new environment as well as provide
continuous connection to the
Exchange’s match engine during the
Transition Period.15 During the
Transition Period, Members will be
required to utilize their new ports on
the new MRX platform for symbols that
have migrated to the new platform,
while continuing to leverage legacy
ports for symbols that have not yet
migrated to the new platform.16 For
example, an MRX Member with 3 legacy
SQF Ports, 1 legacy SQF Purge Port, 1
legacy FIX DROP Port, 1 legacy OTTO
Port, and 1 legacy CTI Port on
November 1, 2022 could request the
equivalent quantity and type of new
ports (3 SQF Ports, 1 SQF Purge Port, 1
FIX DROP Port, 1 OTTO Port, and 1 CTI
Port) for the new MRX environment
during the Transition Period at no
11 SQF Purge is a specific port for the SQF
interface that only receives and notifies of purge
requests from the Market Maker. Dedicated SQF
Purge Ports enable Market Makers to seamlessly
manage their ability to remove their quotes in a
swift manner.
12 ‘‘Ouch to Trade Options’’ or ‘‘OTTO’’ is an
interface that allows Members and their Sponsored
Customers to connect, send, and receive messages
related to orders, auction orders, and auction
responses to the Exchange. Features include the
following: (1) options symbol directory messages
(e.g., underlying and complex instruments); (2)
system event messages (e.g., start of trading hours
messages and start of opening); (3) trading action
messages (e.g., halts and resumes); (4) execution
messages; (5) order messages; (6) risk protection
triggers and cancel notifications; (7) auction
notifications; (8) auction responses; and (9) post
trade allocation messages. See Supplementary
Material .03(b) to Options 3, section 7.
13 Clearing Trade Interface (‘‘CTI’’) is a real-time
cleared trade update message that is sent to a
Member after an execution has occurred and
contains trade details specific to that Member. The
information includes, among other things, the
following: (i) The Clearing Member Trade
Agreement (‘‘CMTA’’) or The Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) number; (ii) badge or
mnemonic; (iii) account number; (iv) information
which identifies the transaction type (e.g., auction
type) for billing purposes; and (v) market
participant capacity. See Option 3, section 23(b)(1).
14 FIX DROP is a real-time order and execution
update message that is sent to a Member after an
order been received/modified or an execution has
occurred and contains trade details specific to that
Member. The information includes, among other
things, the following: (i) executions; (ii)
cancellations; (iii) modifications to an existing
order; and (iv) busts or post-trade corrections. See
Options 3, section 23(b)(3).
15 Members would contact Market Operations to
acquire new duplicative ports.
16 Options Trader Alert #2022–34 describes the
symbol migration schedule which will begin in
November 2022.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 26, 2022
Jkt 259001
additional cost. During the Transition
Period, the MRX Member would be
assessed only for legacy ports and
would not be assessed for the new ports,
which are duplicative of the legacy
ports.
A Member may acquire additional
legacy ports during the Transition
Period and would be assessed the
charges indicated in the current Pricing
Schedule at Options 7, section 6,
respectively, for those additional legacy
ports.
The technology migration does not
require a Member to acquire any
additional legacy ports or any specific
number of new ports, rather the
technology migration requires a new
port to connect to the new MRX
environment. As is the case today, a
Member may decide the number of ports
they desire to subscribe to on the new
technology platform.17
Of note, only MRX Members may
utilize ports on MRX and only one port
is necessary to submit orders to MRX.
Similarly, a Market Maker quoting on
MRX only requires 1 SQF Port.18 A
Member may also obtain any number of
order and execution ports, such as a
SQF Purge Ports, FIX DROP Ports and
CTI Ports and any number of market
data ports.19 Members are able to elect
the quantity and type of ports they
purchase based on that Member’s
business model.20
This proposal is not intended to
impose any additional fees on any MRX
Member. Rather, this proposal is
intended to permit an MRX Member to
utilize the new environment with the
same type and quantity of legacy ports,
at no additional cost, during the
Transition Period.
MRX will sunset legacy FIX Ports,
SQF Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO
Ports, CTI Ports and FIX DROP Ports on
December 30, 2022. After December 30,
2022, each Member would only be able
to utilize the new ports for the new
environment. Starting in January 2023,
the port fees in Options 7, section 6
would apply to any substituted ports
that a Member continues to subscribe to
after the Transition Period.
17 The technology migration is 1:1 and therefore
would not require a Member to acquire an
additional quantity of new ports, nor would it
reduce the total number of ports needed to connect
to the match engine.
18 SQF Ports are utilized solely by Market Makers
who are the only Members permitted to quote on
MRX.
19 MRX does not assess fees for the market data
ports within Options 7, section 6(iii). Members may
acquire any number of market data ports at no cost.
20 For example, a Member may desire to utilize
multiple FIX or OTTO Ports for accounting
purposes, to measure performance, for regulatory
reasons or other determinations that are specific to
that Member.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with section 6(b)
of the Act,21 in general, and furthers the
objectives of sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
of the Act,22 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The proposed changes to the Pricing
Schedule are reasonable in several
respects. As a threshold matter, the
Exchange is subject to significant
competitive forces in the market for
order flow, which constrains its pricing
determinations. The fact that the market
for order flow is competitive has long
been recognized by the courts. In
NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange
Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated,
‘‘[n]o one disputes that competition for
order flow is ‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC
explained, ‘[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities,
and the broker-dealers that act as their
order-routing agents, have a wide range
of choices of where to route orders for
execution’; [and] ‘no exchange can
afford to take its market share
percentages for granted’ because ‘no
exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution
of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’ 23
The Commission and the courts have
repeatedly expressed their preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention to determine prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, while
adopting a series of steps to improve the
current market model, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues, and also recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 24
Congress directed the Commission to
‘‘rely on ‘competition, whenever
possible, in meeting its regulatory
responsibilities for overseeing the SROs
21 See
15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
23 See NetCoalition, 615 F.3d at 539 (D.C. Cir.
2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–83
(December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)).
24 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’).
22 See
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2022 / Notices
and the national market system.’ ’’ 25 As
a result, the Commission has
historically relied on competitive forces
to determine whether a fee proposal is
equitable, fair, reasonable, and not
unreasonably or unfairly discriminatory.
‘‘If competitive forces are operative, the
self-interest of the exchanges themselves
will work powerfully to constrain
unreasonable or unfair behavior.’’ 26
Accordingly, ‘‘the existence of
significant competition provides a
substantial basis for finding that the
terms of an exchange’s fee proposal are
equitable, fair, reasonable, and not
unreasonably or unfairly
discriminatory.’’ 27
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Options 7, Section 1
The Exchange’s proposal to define an
Exposed Order for purposes of pricing
within Options 7, section 1(c) is
reasonable because it will provide
Members information as to the manner
in which pricing will be applied to both
the Exposed Order as well as an order
or quote that allocates against the
Exposed Order.28 As proposed, the
applicable Taker Fee would apply to an
executed Exposed Order and the
applicable Maker Rebate and/or Maker
Fee would apply to an order or quote
that allocated against the Exposed Order
during the Route Timer. The Exchange
believes the proposed pricing should
provide increased opportunities for
participation in executions on the
Exchange, facilitating the ability of the
Exchange to bring together participants
and encourage more robust competition
for orders. Order exposure has the
potential to result in more efficient
executions for participants as responses
to exposed orders could result in faster
executions. Order exposure assures that
such exposed orders will only receive
executions at a price at least as good as
the price disseminated by the best away
market at the time the order was
received.
The Exchange’s proposal to define an
Exposed Order for purposes of pricing
within Options 7, section 1(c) is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory as the proposed pricing
for Exposed Orders would be uniformly
applied to all orders subject to the
Exchange’s Route Timer, as described in
Options 5, section 4.
25 See NetCoalition, 615 F.3d at 534–35; see also
H.R. Rep. No. 94–229 at 92 (1975) (‘‘[I]t is the intent
of the conferees that the national market system
evolve through the interplay of competitive forces
as unnecessary regulatory restrictions are
removed.’’).
26 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039
(December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74,770 (December 9,
2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21).
27 Id.
28 See Option 5, section 4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 26, 2022
Jkt 259001
Options 7, Section 6
The proposed amendments to Options
7, section 6 to permit Members to
acquire a second set of FIX Ports, SQF
Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO Ports, CTI
Ports and FIX DROP Ports, at no cost, as
part of the technology migration are
reasonable because they will permit
MRX Members to migrate to the new
platform without a pricing impact.
Specifically, the proposal is intended to
permit MRX Members to migrate their
legacy FIX Ports, SQF Ports, SQF Purge
Ports, OTTO Ports, CTI Ports and FIX
DROP Ports to new ports at no
additional cost during the Transition
Period. This proposal will allow
Members to test their ports and
maintain continuous connection to the
Exchange’s match engine during the
Transition Period.
The proposed amendments to Options
7, section 6 to permit Members to
acquire a second set of FIX Ports, SQF
Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO Ports, CTI
Ports and FIX DROP Ports, at no cost, as
part of the technology migration are
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because no Member
would have a pricing impact as a result
of this proposal, provided the Member
did not obtain additional new ports to
connect to the MRX environment
beyond the quantity and type the
Member had on November 1, 2022 or
additional legacy ports. No Member
would be assessed a fee for the new
second set of ports, provided they
acquired a new second set of ports
commiserate with the type and quantity
of ports they subscribed to as of
November 1, 2022. A Member obtaining
additional legacy ports, beyond the
current type and quantity of ports they
have as of November 1, 2022, would be
assessed the fees noted in Options 7,
section 6 as applicable. MRX will sunset
legacy FIX Ports, SQF Ports, SQF Purge
Ports, OTTO Ports, CTI Ports and FIX
DROP Ports on December 30, 2022, so
no Member would have a second type
or quantity of a particular port as of
December 30, 2022. Starting in January
2023, the port fees in Options 7, section
6 would apply to any substituted ports
that a Member continues to subscribe to
after the Transition Period.
The technology migration does not
require a Member to acquire any
additional quantity of new ports, nor
would it reduce the total number of
ports needed to connect to the match
engine. Rather the technology migration
requires a new port to replace any
legacy port provided the Member
desired to maintain the same number of
ports on the new MRX technology
platform. Of note, only MRX Members
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65107
may utilize ports on MRX and only one
port is necessary to submit orders to
MRX. Similarly, a Market Maker quoting
on MRX only requires 1 SQF Port.29 A
Member may also obtain any number of
order and execution ports, such as a
SQF Purge Ports, FIX DROP Ports and
CTI Ports and any number of market
data ports.30 Members are able to elect
the quantity and type of ports they
purchase based on that Member’s
business model.31
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange believes its proposal
remains competitive with other options
markets, and will offer market
participants with another choice of
venue to transact options. The Exchange
notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or
rebate opportunities available at other
venues to be more favorable. Because
competitors are free to modify their own
fees in response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange
believes that the degree to which fee
changes in this market may impose any
burden on competition is extremely
limited.
Intramarket Competition
Options 7, Section 1
The Exchange’s proposal to define an
Exposed Order for purposes of pricing
within Options 7, section 1(c) does not
impose an undue burden on
competition because the proposed
pricing for Exposed Orders would be
uniformly applied to all orders subject
to the Exchange’s Route Timer, as
described in Options 4, section 5.
Options 7, Section 6
The proposed amendments to Options
7, section 6 to permit Members to
acquire a second set of FIX Ports, SQF
Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO Ports, CTI
29 SQF Ports are utilized solely by Market Makers
who are the only Members permitted to quote on
MRX.
30 MRX does not assess fees for the market data
ports within Options 7, section 6(iii). Members may
acquire any number of market data ports at no cost.
31 For example, a Member may desire to utilize
multiple FIX or OTTO Ports for accounting
purposes, to measure performance, for regulatory
reasons or other determinations that are specific to
that Member.
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
65108
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2022 / Notices
Ports and FIX DROP Ports, at no cost, as
part of the technology migration do not
impose an undue burden on
competition because no Member would
have a pricing impact as a result of this
proposal, provided the Member did not
obtain additional new ports to connect
to the MRX environment beyond the
quantity and type the Member had on
November 1, 2022 or additional legacy
ports. No Member would be assessed a
fee for the new second set of ports,
provided they acquired a new second
set of ports commiserate with the type
and quantity of ports they subscribed to
as of November 1, 2022. A Member
obtaining additional legacy ports,
beyond the current type and quantity of
ports they have as of November 1, 2022,
would be assessed the fees noted in
Options 7, section 6 as applicable. MRX
will sunset legacy FIX Ports, SQF Ports,
SQF Purge Ports, OTTO Ports, CTI Ports
and FIX DROP Ports on December 30,
2022, so no Member would have a
second type or quantity of a particular
port as of December 30, 2022. Starting
in January 2023, the port fees in Options
7, section 6 would apply to any
substituted ports that a Member
continues to subscribe to after the
Transition Period.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.32 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
32 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 26, 2022
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MRX–2022–21 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MRX–2022–21. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MRX–2022–21 and should
be submitted on or before November 17,
2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.33
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–23354 Filed 10–26–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
33 17
Jkt 259001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Release No. 34–96122; File No. SR–MIAX–
2022–20]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the MIAX Fee
Schedule To Increase Certain
Connectivity Fees and Adopt a TieredPricing Structure for Additional
Limited Service MIAX Express
Interface Ports
October 21, 2022.
On May 2, 2022, Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend the Exchange’s Fee Schedule to
increase certain connectivity fees and
adopt a tiered-pricing structure for
additional limited service express
interface ports.
The proposed rule change was
immediately effective upon filing with
the Commission pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.3 The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register and, pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,4 the
Commission: (1) temporarily suspended
the proposed rule change; and (2)
instituted proceedings under section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 5 to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change.6 On October 19,
2022, the Exchange withdrew the
proposed rule change (SR–MIAX–2022–
20).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–23356 Filed 10–26–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change
may take effect upon filing with the Commission if
it is designated by the exchange as ‘‘establishing or
changing a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the
self-regulatory organization on any person, whether
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory
organization.’’ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94890
(May 11, 2022), 87 FR 29945 (May 17, 2022).
7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65105-65108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23354]
[[Page 65105]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-96120; File No. SR-MRX-2022-21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 7
in Connection With a Technology Migration
October 21, 2022.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 12, 2022, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend MRX's Pricing Schedule at Options
7.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed pricing changes on
September 30, 2022 as SR-MRX-2022-17. On October 12, 2022, the
instant filing replaced SR-MRX-2022-17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/mrx/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
MRX proposes to amend its Pricing Schedule at Options 7.
Specifically, MRX proposes to: (1) add the defined term ``Exposed
Order'' within Options 7, section 1(c); and (2) amend Options 7,
section 6 to offer certain free ports in connection with an upcoming
technology migration. Each change is described below.
Options 7, Section 1
The Exchange proposes to define an Exposed Order for purposes of
pricing within Options 7. The Exchange introduced the concept of an
``exposure'' in a recent rule change amending MRX's routing rules.\4\
In that rule change, the Exchange noted that for purposes of MRX's
Options 5, section 4 routing rule, ``exposure'' or ``exposing'' an
order means a notification sent to Members with the price, size, and
side of interest that is available for execution.\5\ The order exposure
will apply to both routed orders and non-routed or ``DNR Orders.'' The
order exposure process permits the Exchange to apply a Route Timer \6\
prior to the initial and subsequent routing of an order and allows
routing of the order after exposure occurs (during open trading) every
time an order becomes marketable against the ABBO.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94897 (May 12,
2022), 87 FR 30294 (May 18, 2022) (SR-ISE-2022-11) (Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Routing
Functionality in Connection With a Technology Migration). MRX's
Options 5 rules are incorporated by reference to Nasdaq ISE, LLC
Options 5 rules. This rule change was done in connection with a
technology migration. SR-ISE-2022-11 will become operative for MRX
prior to December 23, 2022. The Exchange proposes to announce the
exact date when it will commence a limited symbol migration in an
Options Trader Alert.
\5\ See MRX Options 5, section 4(a) which is effective but not
yet operative. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94897
(May 12, 2022), 87 FR 30294 (May 18, 2022) (SR-ISE-2022-11) (Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Routing Functionality in Connection With a Technology
Migration).
\6\ For purposes of Options 5, section 4, a Route Timer shall
not exceed one second and shall begin at the time orders are
accepted into the System, and the System will consider whether an
order can be routed at the conclusion of each Route Timer.
\7\ See MRX Options 5, section 4 which is effective but not yet
operative. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94897 (May
12, 2022), 87 FR 30294 (May 18, 2022) (SR-ISE-2022-11) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Routing Functionality in Connection With a Technology Migration).
At this time, the Exchange proposes to amend Options 7, section
1(c) to provide, An ``Exposed Order'' is an order that is broadcast
via an order exposure alert as described within Options 5, section 4
(Order Routing). Unless otherwise noted in Options 7, section 3
pricing, Exposed Orders will be assessed the applicable ``Taker''
Fee and any order or quote that executes against an Exposed Order
during a Route Timer will be paid/assessed the applicable ``Maker''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rebate/Fee.
As proposed, the defined term would apply a Taker Fee, where
applicable, to an executed Exposed Order. If an order or quote
allocates against the Exposed Order during the Route Timer described
within Options 5, section 4, the Exchange would pay/assess the
applicable Maker Rebate and/or Maker Fee. The Exchange believes that
its proposal should provide increased opportunities for participation
in executions on the Exchange, facilitating the ability of the Exchange
to bring together participants and encourage more robust competition
for orders.
Options 7, Section 6
In connection with a technology migration,\8\ Members may request
new FIX Ports,\9\ SQF Ports,\10\ SQF Purge
[[Page 65106]]
Ports,\11\ OTTO Ports,\12\ CTI Ports,\13\ and FIX DROP Ports,\14\ at no
additional cost, from November 1, 2022 through December 30, 2022
(``Transition Period'') which are duplicative of the type and quantity
of their legacy ports. These second set of new ports would allow
Members time to test ports to the new environment as well as provide
continuous connection to the Exchange's match engine during the
Transition Period.\15\ During the Transition Period, Members will be
required to utilize their new ports on the new MRX platform for symbols
that have migrated to the new platform, while continuing to leverage
legacy ports for symbols that have not yet migrated to the new
platform.\16\ For example, an MRX Member with 3 legacy SQF Ports, 1
legacy SQF Purge Port, 1 legacy FIX DROP Port, 1 legacy OTTO Port, and
1 legacy CTI Port on November 1, 2022 could request the equivalent
quantity and type of new ports (3 SQF Ports, 1 SQF Purge Port, 1 FIX
DROP Port, 1 OTTO Port, and 1 CTI Port) for the new MRX environment
during the Transition Period at no additional cost. During the
Transition Period, the MRX Member would be assessed only for legacy
ports and would not be assessed for the new ports, which are
duplicative of the legacy ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ MRX is migrating its technology to an enhanced Nasdaq, Inc.
functionality which results in higher performance, scalability, and
more robust architecture. The technology migration would commence in
November 2022.
\9\ ``Financial Information eXchange'' or ``FIX'' is an
interface that allows Members and their Sponsored Customers to
connect, send, and receive messages related to orders and auction
orders to the Exchange. Features include the following: (1)
execution messages; (2) order messages; (3) risk protection triggers
and cancel notifications; and (4) post trade allocation messages.
See Supplementary Material .03(a) to Options 3, section 7.
\10\ ``Specialized Quote Feed'' or ``SQF'' is an interface that
allows Market Makers to connect, send, and receive messages related
to quotes, Immediate-or-Cancel Orders, and auction responses to the
Exchange. Features include the following: (1) options symbol
directory messages (e.g., underlying and complex instruments); (2)
system event messages (e.g., start of trading hours messages and
start of opening); (3) trading action messages (e.g., halts and
resumes); (4) execution messages; (5) quote messages; (6) Immediate-
or-Cancel Order messages; (7) risk protection triggers and purge
notifications; (8) opening imbalance messages; (9) auction
notifications; and (10) auction responses. The SQF Purge Interface
only receives and notifies of purge requests from the Market Maker.
Market Makers may only enter interest into SQF in their assigned
options series. See Supplementary Material .03(c) to Options 3,
section 7.
\11\ SQF Purge is a specific port for the SQF interface that
only receives and notifies of purge requests from the Market Maker.
Dedicated SQF Purge Ports enable Market Makers to seamlessly manage
their ability to remove their quotes in a swift manner.
\12\ ``Ouch to Trade Options'' or ``OTTO'' is an interface that
allows Members and their Sponsored Customers to connect, send, and
receive messages related to orders, auction orders, and auction
responses to the Exchange. Features include the following: (1)
options symbol directory messages (e.g., underlying and complex
instruments); (2) system event messages (e.g., start of trading
hours messages and start of opening); (3) trading action messages
(e.g., halts and resumes); (4) execution messages; (5) order
messages; (6) risk protection triggers and cancel notifications; (7)
auction notifications; (8) auction responses; and (9) post trade
allocation messages. See Supplementary Material .03(b) to Options 3,
section 7.
\13\ Clearing Trade Interface (``CTI'') is a real-time cleared
trade update message that is sent to a Member after an execution has
occurred and contains trade details specific to that Member. The
information includes, among other things, the following: (i) The
Clearing Member Trade Agreement (``CMTA'') or The Options Clearing
Corporation (``OCC'') number; (ii) badge or mnemonic; (iii) account
number; (iv) information which identifies the transaction type
(e.g., auction type) for billing purposes; and (v) market
participant capacity. See Option 3, section 23(b)(1).
\14\ FIX DROP is a real-time order and execution update message
that is sent to a Member after an order been received/modified or an
execution has occurred and contains trade details specific to that
Member. The information includes, among other things, the following:
(i) executions; (ii) cancellations; (iii) modifications to an
existing order; and (iv) busts or post-trade corrections. See
Options 3, section 23(b)(3).
\15\ Members would contact Market Operations to acquire new
duplicative ports.
\16\ Options Trader Alert #2022-34 describes the symbol
migration schedule which will begin in November 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Member may acquire additional legacy ports during the Transition
Period and would be assessed the charges indicated in the current
Pricing Schedule at Options 7, section 6, respectively, for those
additional legacy ports.
The technology migration does not require a Member to acquire any
additional legacy ports or any specific number of new ports, rather the
technology migration requires a new port to connect to the new MRX
environment. As is the case today, a Member may decide the number of
ports they desire to subscribe to on the new technology platform.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The technology migration is 1:1 and therefore would not
require a Member to acquire an additional quantity of new ports, nor
would it reduce the total number of ports needed to connect to the
match engine.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of note, only MRX Members may utilize ports on MRX and only one
port is necessary to submit orders to MRX. Similarly, a Market Maker
quoting on MRX only requires 1 SQF Port.\18\ A Member may also obtain
any number of order and execution ports, such as a SQF Purge Ports, FIX
DROP Ports and CTI Ports and any number of market data ports.\19\
Members are able to elect the quantity and type of ports they purchase
based on that Member's business model.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ SQF Ports are utilized solely by Market Makers who are the
only Members permitted to quote on MRX.
\19\ MRX does not assess fees for the market data ports within
Options 7, section 6(iii). Members may acquire any number of market
data ports at no cost.
\20\ For example, a Member may desire to utilize multiple FIX or
OTTO Ports for accounting purposes, to measure performance, for
regulatory reasons or other determinations that are specific to that
Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposal is not intended to impose any additional fees on any
MRX Member. Rather, this proposal is intended to permit an MRX Member
to utilize the new environment with the same type and quantity of
legacy ports, at no additional cost, during the Transition Period.
MRX will sunset legacy FIX Ports, SQF Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO
Ports, CTI Ports and FIX DROP Ports on December 30, 2022. After
December 30, 2022, each Member would only be able to utilize the new
ports for the new environment. Starting in January 2023, the port fees
in Options 7, section 6 would apply to any substituted ports that a
Member continues to subscribe to after the Transition Period.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with section
6(b) of the Act,\21\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\22\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\22\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed changes to the Pricing Schedule are reasonable in
several respects. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is subject to
significant competitive forces in the market for order flow, which
constrains its pricing determinations. The fact that the market for
order flow is competitive has long been recognized by the courts. In
NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .'' \23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See NetCoalition, 615 F.3d at 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (quoting
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR
74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention to determine
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues, and also recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congress directed the Commission to ``rely on `competition,
whenever possible, in meeting its regulatory responsibilities for
overseeing the SROs
[[Page 65107]]
and the national market system.' '' \25\ As a result, the Commission
has historically relied on competitive forces to determine whether a
fee proposal is equitable, fair, reasonable, and not unreasonably or
unfairly discriminatory. ``If competitive forces are operative, the
self-interest of the exchanges themselves will work powerfully to
constrain unreasonable or unfair behavior.'' \26\ Accordingly, ``the
existence of significant competition provides a substantial basis for
finding that the terms of an exchange's fee proposal are equitable,
fair, reasonable, and not unreasonably or unfairly discriminatory.''
\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See NetCoalition, 615 F.3d at 534-35; see also H.R. Rep.
No. 94-229 at 92 (1975) (``[I]t is the intent of the conferees that
the national market system evolve through the interplay of
competitive forces as unnecessary regulatory restrictions are
removed.'').
\26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74,770 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-21).
\27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options 7, Section 1
The Exchange's proposal to define an Exposed Order for purposes of
pricing within Options 7, section 1(c) is reasonable because it will
provide Members information as to the manner in which pricing will be
applied to both the Exposed Order as well as an order or quote that
allocates against the Exposed Order.\28\ As proposed, the applicable
Taker Fee would apply to an executed Exposed Order and the applicable
Maker Rebate and/or Maker Fee would apply to an order or quote that
allocated against the Exposed Order during the Route Timer. The
Exchange believes the proposed pricing should provide increased
opportunities for participation in executions on the Exchange,
facilitating the ability of the Exchange to bring together participants
and encourage more robust competition for orders. Order exposure has
the potential to result in more efficient executions for participants
as responses to exposed orders could result in faster executions. Order
exposure assures that such exposed orders will only receive executions
at a price at least as good as the price disseminated by the best away
market at the time the order was received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Option 5, section 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to define an Exposed Order for purposes of
pricing within Options 7, section 1(c) is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory as the proposed pricing for Exposed Orders would be
uniformly applied to all orders subject to the Exchange's Route Timer,
as described in Options 5, section 4.
Options 7, Section 6
The proposed amendments to Options 7, section 6 to permit Members
to acquire a second set of FIX Ports, SQF Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO
Ports, CTI Ports and FIX DROP Ports, at no cost, as part of the
technology migration are reasonable because they will permit MRX
Members to migrate to the new platform without a pricing impact.
Specifically, the proposal is intended to permit MRX Members to migrate
their legacy FIX Ports, SQF Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO Ports, CTI
Ports and FIX DROP Ports to new ports at no additional cost during the
Transition Period. This proposal will allow Members to test their ports
and maintain continuous connection to the Exchange's match engine
during the Transition Period.
The proposed amendments to Options 7, section 6 to permit Members
to acquire a second set of FIX Ports, SQF Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO
Ports, CTI Ports and FIX DROP Ports, at no cost, as part of the
technology migration are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because no Member would have a pricing impact as a result of this
proposal, provided the Member did not obtain additional new ports to
connect to the MRX environment beyond the quantity and type the Member
had on November 1, 2022 or additional legacy ports. No Member would be
assessed a fee for the new second set of ports, provided they acquired
a new second set of ports commiserate with the type and quantity of
ports they subscribed to as of November 1, 2022. A Member obtaining
additional legacy ports, beyond the current type and quantity of ports
they have as of November 1, 2022, would be assessed the fees noted in
Options 7, section 6 as applicable. MRX will sunset legacy FIX Ports,
SQF Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO Ports, CTI Ports and FIX DROP Ports on
December 30, 2022, so no Member would have a second type or quantity of
a particular port as of December 30, 2022. Starting in January 2023,
the port fees in Options 7, section 6 would apply to any substituted
ports that a Member continues to subscribe to after the Transition
Period.
The technology migration does not require a Member to acquire any
additional quantity of new ports, nor would it reduce the total number
of ports needed to connect to the match engine. Rather the technology
migration requires a new port to replace any legacy port provided the
Member desired to maintain the same number of ports on the new MRX
technology platform. Of note, only MRX Members may utilize ports on MRX
and only one port is necessary to submit orders to MRX. Similarly, a
Market Maker quoting on MRX only requires 1 SQF Port.\29\ A Member may
also obtain any number of order and execution ports, such as a SQF
Purge Ports, FIX DROP Ports and CTI Ports and any number of market data
ports.\30\ Members are able to elect the quantity and type of ports
they purchase based on that Member's business model.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ SQF Ports are utilized solely by Market Makers who are the
only Members permitted to quote on MRX.
\30\ MRX does not assess fees for the market data ports within
Options 7, section 6(iii). Members may acquire any number of market
data ports at no cost.
\31\ For example, a Member may desire to utilize multiple FIX or
OTTO Ports for accounting purposes, to measure performance, for
regulatory reasons or other determinations that are specific to that
Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange believes its proposal remains competitive with other
options markets, and will offer market participants with another choice
of venue to transact options. The Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily
favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be
more favorable. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees
in response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
Intramarket Competition
Options 7, Section 1
The Exchange's proposal to define an Exposed Order for purposes of
pricing within Options 7, section 1(c) does not impose an undue burden
on competition because the proposed pricing for Exposed Orders would be
uniformly applied to all orders subject to the Exchange's Route Timer,
as described in Options 4, section 5.
Options 7, Section 6
The proposed amendments to Options 7, section 6 to permit Members
to acquire a second set of FIX Ports, SQF Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO
Ports, CTI
[[Page 65108]]
Ports and FIX DROP Ports, at no cost, as part of the technology
migration do not impose an undue burden on competition because no
Member would have a pricing impact as a result of this proposal,
provided the Member did not obtain additional new ports to connect to
the MRX environment beyond the quantity and type the Member had on
November 1, 2022 or additional legacy ports. No Member would be
assessed a fee for the new second set of ports, provided they acquired
a new second set of ports commiserate with the type and quantity of
ports they subscribed to as of November 1, 2022. A Member obtaining
additional legacy ports, beyond the current type and quantity of ports
they have as of November 1, 2022, would be assessed the fees noted in
Options 7, section 6 as applicable. MRX will sunset legacy FIX Ports,
SQF Ports, SQF Purge Ports, OTTO Ports, CTI Ports and FIX DROP Ports on
December 30, 2022, so no Member would have a second type or quantity of
a particular port as of December 30, 2022. Starting in January 2023,
the port fees in Options 7, section 6 would apply to any substituted
ports that a Member continues to subscribe to after the Transition
Period.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\32\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MRX-2022-21 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2022-21. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2022-21 and should be submitted on
or before November 17, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-23354 Filed 10-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P