Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for Comment; Influence of Drivers' Internal Reasoning on Speeding, 64536-64538 [2022-23086]

Download as PDF 64536 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2022 / Notices Requests To Remove the Requirement That Engines or Motors Be U.S.Manufactured Ten commenters disfavored the waiver requirement that engines or motors be produced in the United States as reported under the AALA. Many of those commenters cited supply chain difficulties and long lead times for commercial vans and minivans as a rationale for removing the country-oforigin requirement for engines and motors. One commenter stated that FTA should remove the country-of-origin requirement for motors to promote the adoption of electric vehicles. Several commenters noted that some vehicles currently used in vanpool fleets would not be eligible under this requirement, and that requiring U.S.-manufactured engines and motors would impact fleet usage. FTA’s intent in granting this waiver is to strike a balance between making vanpool-capable vehicles available to public transportation providers, and at the same time maximizing U.S. manufacturing activity in accordance with Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America’s Workers. FTA understands that requiring U.S.manufactured engines and motors will limit vehicle selection for recipients and may impact turnkey service contractors with existing fleets, compared to if FTA did not require domestic manufacturing at all. However, there are a number of van and minivan models currently available that meet FTA’s waiver requirements. The requirement that engines or motors are of U.S. origin strikes a balance between availability and supporting U.S. manufacturing, and therefore, FTA declines to revise it. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Requests To Lengthen the Waiver Period or Perform an Availability Analysis Before Allowing the Waiver To Expire Sixty-nine commenters—many of them citing COVID–19 supply chain issues and reduced dealership inventory—requested that FTA extend the waiver beyond the proposed twoyear period. Many commenters pointed out that FTA’s 2016 waiver for vans and minivans lasted for three years. Fortynine commenters requested that the proposed waiver continue indefinitely until such time as a fully Buy America compliant vehicle becomes available. FTA’s two-year waiver is timelimited, consistent with the waiver principles and criteria contained in the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Initial Implementation Guidance, M–22–11. Furthermore, FTA notes that VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:52 Oct 24, 2022 Jkt 259001 this waiver applies to contracts entered into during the two-year period, independent of the delivery date of vehicles. For these reasons, FTA declines to extend the waiver period. Objection to Proposed Waiver One commenter objected to the proposed waiver, noting that manufacturers had three years under the 2016 waiver to produce a compliant vehicle, and FTA providing another waiver would send the wrong message to industry. The commenter also stated that transit agencies do not conduct adequate market research for their procurements and overall do not do a reasonable job of buying rolling stock. By law, if FTA denies a request for a nonavailability waiver, FTA must certify a list of known manufacturers from which the required item can be obtained. 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(6). FTA is presently unable to make that certification because FTA cannot identify a Buy America compliant, unmodified, non-ADA-accessible van or minivan produced in the United States. No bidder or offeror certified compliance with Buy America requirements in response to the procurements conducted by the three waiver applicants. Additionally, FTA conducted outreach to manufacturers with the highest levels of U.S. or Canadian 1 content and U.S. final assembly, and those manufacturers expressed disinterest in participating in FTA-funded procurements due to domestic content and auditing requirements. FTA’s waiver is intended to maximize the domestic content of the vans and minivans procured with Federal assistance, consistent with U.S. Department of Transportation policy goals. FTA will rescind the two-year waiver if, during the waiver period, the FTA determines that a Buy America compliant van or minivan is available. Finding on Waiver In accordance with subsection 70916(c) of the Build America, Buy America Act (Title IX of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Pub. L. 117–58), FTA consulted with the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP), which determined that no domestic entity currently manufactures the subject vans 1 Reporting under the AALA distinguishes between the United States and Canada for the location of final assembly and the country of origin of engines and transmissions, but it does not distinguish between the United States and Canada for content levels. 49 U.S.C. 32304(b)(A); 49 CFR 583.5. PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and minivans in compliance with Buy America requirements, and that supplier scouting by MEP is not warranted. Therefore, for the reasons stated in FTA’s July 19, 2022, notice of proposed nonavailability waiver and based on comments received from the public, FTA is granting the waiver as proposed. For mass-produced, unmodified nonADA accessible vans and minivans with seating capacity for at least six adults not including the driver, in lieu of applying the Buy America standards for rolling stock, FTA will require: (1) Final assembly must be in the United States, as reported to NHTSA under the AALA; (2) The country of origin of the engine or (in the case of electric vehicles), motor must be the United States, as reported to NHTSA under the AALA; (3) The waiver is available to all FTA grant recipients; (4) The waiver expires two years from the date this notice is published in the Federal Register, or upon FTA’s publication of a Federal Register notice rescinding the waiver after determining that a fully Buy America-compliant vehicle has become available, whichever occurs first. For the duration of this partial general nonavailability waiver, FTA recipients do not need to submit individual applications for nonavailability waivers for these vehicles. Nuria I. Fernandez, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2022–23198 Filed 10–24–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–57–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA–2022–0045] Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for Comment; Influence of Drivers’ Internal Reasoning on Speeding National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice and request for comments on a proposed collection of information. AGENCY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) invites public comments about our intention to request approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a proposed collection of information. Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from the public, it SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2022 / Notices must receive approval from OMB. Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of information. This document describes a collection of information for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval on the Influence of Drivers’ Internal Reasoning on Speeding. Comments must be submitted on or before December 27, 2022. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the Docket No. NHTSA– 2022–0045 through any of the following methods: • Electronic submissions: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12– 140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 366–9322 before coming. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below. Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78) or you may visit https:// www.transportation.gov/privacy. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov or the street address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets via internet. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or access to background documents, contact Stacy Jeleniewski, Ph.D., Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NPD–310), (202) 366– 2752 (office), (202) 981–3173 (cell), Stacy.Jeleniewski@dot.gov, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES DATES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:52 Oct 24, 2022 Jkt 259001 W46–491, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB for approval, it must first publish a document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a document. Under OMB’s regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) how to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology,e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public comments on the following proposed collection of information for which the agency is seeking approval from OMB. Title: Influence of Drivers’ Internal Reasoning on Speeding. OMB Control Number: New. Form Numbers: NHTSA Form 1659. Type of Request: Approval of a New Information Collection. Type of Review Requested: Regular. Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of approval. Summary of the Collection of Information: NHTSA is seeking approval to conduct a survey of 1,500 licensed drivers in Washington State age 18 and older regarding speeding. The study will coordinate with the Washington Traffic Safety Commission and Washington Department of Licensing to survey drivers in the State who received one or more speeding convictions in the last three years and drivers not convicted of speeding in that same time-frame. Participation in the study will be voluntary. The study will use a self-administered web-based survey with a paper survey option PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 64537 available. The survey will include general and speeding-specific questions about moral reasoning (judgments about rightfulness and wrongfulness), legal reasoning (judgments about lawfulness and unlawfulness), and attitudes and perceptions of laws, enforcement, and sanctions. Past speeding behavior and intent to speed in the future will also be assessed. In conducting the proposed research, the survey will use computer-assisted web interviewing (i.e., a programmed, self-administered, web survey) to facilitate ease of use and maximize data accuracy. Although web will be the primary data collection mode, a paper questionnaire will be sent to households that do not respond to the web invitations. The proposed survey will be anonymous, and the survey will not collect any personal identifying information. This collection only requires respondents to report their answers; there are no record-keeping costs to the respondents. Individuals receiving a survey invitation will receive compensation in return for their activities. The results of this research will assist NHTSA in better understanding how to develop successful programs to improve driver safety. The technical report will be distributed to a variety of audiences interested in improving highway safety. This collection will inform the development of countermeasures, particularly in the areas of communications and outreach intended to reduce speeding. Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the Information: NHTSA was established to reduce the number of deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle crashes on the Nation’s highways. As part of this statutory mandate, NHTSA is authorized to conduct research as a foundation for the development of traffic safety programs. Title 23, United States Code, Section 403 gives the Secretary of Transportation (NHTSA by delegation) authorization to use funds appropriated to conduct research and development activities, including demonstration projects and the collection and analysis of highway and motor vehicle safety data and related information, with respect to all aspects of highway and traffic safety systems and conditions relating to vehicle, highway, driver, passenger, motorcyclist, bicyclist, and pedestrian characteristics; accident causation and investigations; and human behavioral factors and their effect on highway and traffic safety. Speeding behavior is an area for which NHTSA has developed comprehensive E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 64538 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2022 / Notices programs to meet its injury reduction goals. The major components of speeding safety programs are education, enforcement, and outreach, with legislative efforts added to the mix. Speeding continues to be a major safety problem. In 2019, speeding was a contributing factor in 26% of fatal, 12% of injury, and 9% of property-damageonly crashes. Motor vehicle crashes in 2019 where at least one driver was speeding accounted for 9,478 fatalities. That same year, 326,000 people were injured in speeding-related traffic crashes.1 To address the safety problem, NHTSA has provided State Highway Safety Offices and safety advocates with information on attitudes and behaviors of drivers who speed, including changes across time, and classified speeder types.2 3 NHTSA is continuing these efforts and attempting to assist the development of more tailored countermeasures by conducting this new study to evaluate additional psychological factors that may predict speeding behavior. In order to design countermeasures that address directly the factors that influence speeding behavior and intention to engage in this behavior, it is necessary to understand as much as licensed drivers in the State of Washington at the time the sample is drawn; (2) age 18 and older; (3) randomly selected from the total drivers in Washington State in three groups based on the number of speeding convictions on their driver record (0; 1; and 2+). Estimated Number of Respondents: Participation in this study will be voluntary. The study anticipates contacting up to 4,545 adult licensed drivers from Washington State to obtain no more than 1,500 completed surveys. Frequency of Collection: The study will be conducted one time during the three-year period for which NHTSA is requesting approval. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: NHTSA estimates the approximate time to complete the survey is 20 minutes per participant. Details of the burden hours for each wave in the survey are included in Table 1 below. When rounded up to the nearest whole hour for each data collection effort, the total estimated annual burden from the project activities for 1,500 participants is 501 hours. possible about the internal reasoning of drivers who speed. Insight into factors such as judgments about whether speeding is morally right or wrong and perceptions of the legitimacy of the speed laws, enforcement, and sanctions can help to develop tailored and effective interventions. This study will examine these factors by conducting a survey of speeders and non-speeders. NHTSA will use the findings to assist States, localities, and communities in developing and refining countermeasures that will aid in their efforts to reduce speeding behavior and speeding-related crashes and injuries. NHTSA will disseminate the information from this study in a technical report. The technical report will provide aggregate (summary) statistics and tables as well as the results of statistical analysis of the information, but it will not include any personally identifiable information (PII). The technical report will be shared with State highway offices, local governments, and those who develop traffic safety communications that aim to reduce speeding behavior and speeding-related crashes. Affected Public: Participants are eligible for the survey if they are (1) TABLE 1—ESTIMATED TOTAL BURDEN FOR SURVEY Number of contacts Wave Estimated burden per sample unit (in minutes) Participant type Frequency of burden Number of sample units Total burden hours * Wave 1 (Initial Invitation) ........ Wave 2 (Reminder Postcard #1). Wave 3 (1st Survey Mailing— NHTSA Form 1659). Wave 4 (Reminder Postcard #2). Wave 5 (2nd Survey Mailing— NHTSA Form 1659). 4,545 4,050 Recruited participant—Eligible respondent ..... Recruited participant—Eligible respondent ..... 20 20 1 1 495 297 165 99 3,753 Recruited participant—Eligible respondent ..... 20 1 376 126 3,377 Recruited participant—Eligible respondent ..... 20 1 188 63 3,189 Recruited participant—Eligible respondent ..... 20 1 144 48 Total ................................. ........................ .......................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 501 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES * Rounded up to the nearest hour. Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost: Participation in this study is voluntary, and there are no costs to respondents beyond the time spent completing the questionnaires. Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspects of this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Department’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 1 National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2021, October). Speeding: 2019 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 813 194). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2 Richard, C.M., Campbell, J.L., Lichty, M.G., Brown, J.L., Chrysler, S., Lee, J.D., Boyle, L., & Reagle, G. (2012, August). Motivations for speeding, Volume I: Summary report. (Report No. DOT HS 811 658). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Oct 24, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29A. Nanda Narayanan Srinivasan, Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development. [FR Doc. 2022–23086 Filed 10–24–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 3 Schroeder, P., Kostyniuk, L., & Mack, M. (2013, December). 2011 National Survey of Speeding Attitudes and Behaviors. (Report No. DOT HS 811 865). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64536-64538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2022-0045]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for 
Comment; Influence of Drivers' Internal Reasoning on Speeding

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments on a proposed collection of 
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) 
invites public comments about our intention to request approval from 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a proposed collection of 
information. Before a Federal agency can collect certain information 
from the public, it

[[Page 64537]]

must receive approval from OMB. Under procedures established by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal 
agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of 
information. This document describes a collection of information for 
which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval on the Influence of Drivers' 
Internal Reasoning on Speeding.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 27, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the Docket No. NHTSA-
2022-0045 through any of the following methods:
     Electronic submissions: Go to the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions 
for submitting comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management, U.S. Department 
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12-
140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except on Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help 
you, please call (202) 366-9322 before coming.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and 
docket number for this notice. Note that all comments received will be 
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any 
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading 
below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all 
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual 
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf 
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's 
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on 
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the street 
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the 
dockets via internet.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or access 
to background documents, contact Stacy Jeleniewski, Ph.D., Office of 
Behavioral Safety Research (NPD-310), (202) 366-2752 (office), (202) 
981-3173 (cell), [email protected], National Highway Traffic 
Safety Administration, W46-491, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, 
DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency submits a proposed 
collection of information to OMB for approval, it must first publish a 
document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day comment period and 
otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies 
concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has 
promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a 
document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must 
ask for public comment on the following: (a) whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) how to enhance 
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; 
and (d) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology,e.g. permitting electronic 
submission of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA 
asks for public comments on the following proposed collection of 
information for which the agency is seeking approval from OMB.
    Title: Influence of Drivers' Internal Reasoning on Speeding.
    OMB Control Number: New.
    Form Numbers: NHTSA Form 1659.
    Type of Request: Approval of a New Information Collection.
    Type of Review Requested: Regular.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of 
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information: NHTSA is seeking approval 
to conduct a survey of 1,500 licensed drivers in Washington State age 
18 and older regarding speeding. The study will coordinate with the 
Washington Traffic Safety Commission and Washington Department of 
Licensing to survey drivers in the State who received one or more 
speeding convictions in the last three years and drivers not convicted 
of speeding in that same time-frame. Participation in the study will be 
voluntary. The study will use a self-administered web-based survey with 
a paper survey option available. The survey will include general and 
speeding-specific questions about moral reasoning (judgments about 
rightfulness and wrongfulness), legal reasoning (judgments about 
lawfulness and unlawfulness), and attitudes and perceptions of laws, 
enforcement, and sanctions. Past speeding behavior and intent to speed 
in the future will also be assessed.
    In conducting the proposed research, the survey will use computer-
assisted web interviewing (i.e., a programmed, self-administered, web 
survey) to facilitate ease of use and maximize data accuracy. Although 
web will be the primary data collection mode, a paper questionnaire 
will be sent to households that do not respond to the web invitations. 
The proposed survey will be anonymous, and the survey will not collect 
any personal identifying information. This collection only requires 
respondents to report their answers; there are no record-keeping costs 
to the respondents. Individuals receiving a survey invitation will 
receive compensation in return for their activities.
    The results of this research will assist NHTSA in better 
understanding how to develop successful programs to improve driver 
safety. The technical report will be distributed to a variety of 
audiences interested in improving highway safety. This collection will 
inform the development of countermeasures, particularly in the areas of 
communications and outreach intended to reduce speeding.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the 
Information: NHTSA was established to reduce the number of deaths, 
injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle crashes on 
the Nation's highways. As part of this statutory mandate, NHTSA is 
authorized to conduct research as a foundation for the development of 
traffic safety programs. Title 23, United States Code, Section 403 
gives the Secretary of Transportation (NHTSA by delegation) 
authorization to use funds appropriated to conduct research and 
development activities, including demonstration projects and the 
collection and analysis of highway and motor vehicle safety data and 
related information, with respect to all aspects of highway and traffic 
safety systems and conditions relating to vehicle, highway, driver, 
passenger, motorcyclist, bicyclist, and pedestrian characteristics; 
accident causation and investigations; and human behavioral factors and 
their effect on highway and traffic safety. Speeding behavior is an 
area for which NHTSA has developed comprehensive

[[Page 64538]]

programs to meet its injury reduction goals. The major components of 
speeding safety programs are education, enforcement, and outreach, with 
legislative efforts added to the mix.
    Speeding continues to be a major safety problem. In 2019, speeding 
was a contributing factor in 26% of fatal, 12% of injury, and 9% of 
property-damage-only crashes. Motor vehicle crashes in 2019 where at 
least one driver was speeding accounted for 9,478 fatalities. That same 
year, 326,000 people were injured in speeding-related traffic 
crashes.\1\ To address the safety problem, NHTSA has provided State 
Highway Safety Offices and safety advocates with information on 
attitudes and behaviors of drivers who speed, including changes across 
time, and classified speeder types.2 3 NHTSA is continuing 
these efforts and attempting to assist the development of more tailored 
countermeasures by conducting this new study to evaluate additional 
psychological factors that may predict speeding behavior.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2021, 
October). Speeding: 2019 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT 
HS 813 194). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
    \2\ Richard, C.M., Campbell, J.L., Lichty, M.G., Brown, J.L., 
Chrysler, S., Lee, J.D., Boyle, L., & Reagle, G. (2012, August). 
Motivations for speeding, Volume I: Summary report. (Report No. DOT 
HS 811 658). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration.
    \3\ Schroeder, P., Kostyniuk, L., & Mack, M. (2013, December). 
2011 National Survey of Speeding Attitudes and Behaviors. (Report 
No. DOT HS 811 865). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to design countermeasures that address directly the 
factors that influence speeding behavior and intention to engage in 
this behavior, it is necessary to understand as much as possible about 
the internal reasoning of drivers who speed. Insight into factors such 
as judgments about whether speeding is morally right or wrong and 
perceptions of the legitimacy of the speed laws, enforcement, and 
sanctions can help to develop tailored and effective interventions. 
This study will examine these factors by conducting a survey of 
speeders and non-speeders. NHTSA will use the findings to assist 
States, localities, and communities in developing and refining 
countermeasures that will aid in their efforts to reduce speeding 
behavior and speeding-related crashes and injuries.
    NHTSA will disseminate the information from this study in a 
technical report. The technical report will provide aggregate (summary) 
statistics and tables as well as the results of statistical analysis of 
the information, but it will not include any personally identifiable 
information (PII). The technical report will be shared with State 
highway offices, local governments, and those who develop traffic 
safety communications that aim to reduce speeding behavior and 
speeding-related crashes.
    Affected Public: Participants are eligible for the survey if they 
are (1) licensed drivers in the State of Washington at the time the 
sample is drawn; (2) age 18 and older; (3) randomly selected from the 
total drivers in Washington State in three groups based on the number 
of speeding convictions on their driver record (0; 1; and 2+).
    Estimated Number of Respondents: Participation in this study will 
be voluntary. The study anticipates contacting up to 4,545 adult 
licensed drivers from Washington State to obtain no more than 1,500 
completed surveys.
    Frequency of Collection: The study will be conducted one time 
during the three-year period for which NHTSA is requesting approval.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: NHTSA estimates the 
approximate time to complete the survey is 20 minutes per participant. 
Details of the burden hours for each wave in the survey are included in 
Table 1 below. When rounded up to the nearest whole hour for each data 
collection effort, the total estimated annual burden from the project 
activities for 1,500 participants is 501 hours.

                                                       Table 1--Estimated Total Burden for Survey
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                             Estimated
                                               Number of                                    burden per     Frequency of      Number of     Total burden
                   Wave                        contacts           Participant type          sample unit       burden       sample units       hours *
                                                                                           (in minutes)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wave 1 (Initial Invitation)...............           4,545  Recruited participant--                   20               1             495             165
                                                             Eligible respondent.
Wave 2 (Reminder Postcard #1).............           4,050  Recruited participant--                   20               1             297              99
                                                             Eligible respondent.
Wave 3 (1st Survey Mailing--NHTSA Form               3,753  Recruited participant--                   20               1             376             126
 1659).                                                      Eligible respondent.
Wave 4 (Reminder Postcard #2).............           3,377  Recruited participant--                   20               1             188              63
                                                             Eligible respondent.
Wave 5 (2nd Survey Mailing--NHTSA Form               3,189  Recruited participant--                   20               1             144              48
 1659).                                                      Eligible respondent.
                                                                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.................................  ..............  ............................  ..............  ..............  ..............             501
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Rounded up to the nearest hour.

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost: Participation in this study is 
voluntary, and there are no costs to respondents beyond the time spent 
completing the questionnaires.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspects of 
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Department, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Department's estimate 
of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 
35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29A.

Nanda Narayanan Srinivasan,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2022-23086 Filed 10-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.