Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition, DP20-002, 62494-62496 [2022-22394]
Download as PDF
62494
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2022 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED HOUR BURDEN AND ASSOCIATED LABOR COSTS
Estimated total
annual burden
hours
Estimated total
annual labor
costs at
$50.44/hour
Event Data Recorders ..................................................
Lighting-VHAD ..............................................................
Lighting-SABs ...............................................................
Tire Selection and Rims ...............................................
Tire Pressure Monitoring ..............................................
Head Restraints ............................................................
Glazing ..........................................................................
Crash Protection ...........................................................
Seat Belt Anchors .........................................................
Child Restraints ............................................................
Child Restraint Anchorages ..........................................
Ejection Mitigation ........................................................
CNG Fuel Systems .......................................................
Truck-Camper Loading .................................................
Tire Quality ...................................................................
Utility Vehicles ..............................................................
203
383
613
0
438
876
176
2,750
438
20
876
1,205
18
35
579
18
$10,239
19,319
30,920
0
22,093
44,185
8,877
138,710
22,093
1,009
44,185
60,755
908
1,765
29,205
908
.......................................................................................
8,628
435,171
Part/section
Brief title
563 ................................................................................
571.108 .........................................................................
571.108 .........................................................................
571.110 .........................................................................
571.138 .........................................................................
571.202a .......................................................................
571.205 .........................................................................
571.208 .........................................................................
571.210 .........................................................................
571.213 .........................................................................
571.225 .........................................................................
571.226 .........................................................................
571.303 .........................................................................
575.103 .........................................................................
575.104 .........................................................................
575.105 .........................................................................
Totals .....................................................................
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED PRINTING COSTS
Brief title
563 .................................
571.108 ..........................
571.108 ..........................
571.110 ..........................
571.138 ..........................
571.202a ........................
571.205 ..........................
571.208 ..........................
571.210 ..........................
571.213 ..........................
571.225 ..........................
571.226 ..........................
571.303 ..........................
575.103 ..........................
575.104 ..........................
575.105 ..........................
Event Data Recorders .............................................................................................................................
Lighting-VHAD .........................................................................................................................................
Lighting-SABs ..........................................................................................................................................
Tire Selection and Rims ..........................................................................................................................
Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems ..........................................................................................................
Head Restraints ......................................................................................................................................
Glazing ....................................................................................................................................................
Occupant Crash Protection .....................................................................................................................
Seat Belt Assembly Anchors ..................................................................................................................
Child Restraints Systems ........................................................................................................................
Child Restraint Anchorage Systems .......................................................................................................
Ejection Mitigation ...................................................................................................................................
Fuel System Integrity of Compressed Natural Gas Vehicles .................................................................
Truck-Camper Loading ...........................................................................................................................
Uniform Tire Quality Grading Standards ................................................................................................
Vehicle Rollover ......................................................................................................................................
$30,566
38,208
244,530
0
244,530
733,590
131
3,397,680
244,530
15,730
943,800
1,833,975
36
39,657
193,205
11,293
..................................................................................................................................................................
7,971,461
Total Printing Costs
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
Estimated total
costs to
respondents
Part/section
Public Comments Invited:
You are asked to comment on any
aspects of this information collection,
including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Oct 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as
amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order
1351.29.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2022–22298 Filed 10–13–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2020–0071]
Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition,
DP20–002
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Denial of a petition for a defect
investigation.
AGENCY:
This notice sets forth the
reasons for the denial of a defect
petition, DP20–002, submitted by Mr.
V.T. Wakefield (the Petitioner) to
NHTSA (the Agency) by a letter dated
December 12, 2019. The petition
SUMMARY:
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2022 / Notices
requested that the Agency initiate a
safety defect investigation of passenger
compartment fires attributed to HVAC
blower motor connectors overheating in
Model Year (MY) 2006–2010 Pontiac
Solstice and Saturn Sky vehicles (the
‘‘subject vehicles’’). After conducting a
technical review of: (1) consumer
complaints identified by the petitioner;
(2) consumer complaint information in
NHTSA’s databases; and (3) information
provided by General Motors (GM) in
response to the Agency’s information
request regarding vehicle fires and
complaints received by GM, NHTSA’s
Office of Defect Investigations (ODI) has
concluded that the issues raised by the
petition do not warrant a defect
investigation. Accordingly, the Agency
has denied the petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Alexander Argant, Vehicle Defect
Division A, Office of Defects
Investigation, NHTSA 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: 202–366–8787. Email:
alexander.argant@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
Introduction
Interested persons may petition
NHTSA requesting that the Agency
initiate an investigation to determine
whether a motor vehicle or an item of
replacement equipment does not
comply with an applicable motor
vehicle safety standard or contains a
defect that relates to motor vehicle
safety. 49 U.S.C. 30162(a)(2); 49 CFR
552.1. Upon receipt of a properly filed
petition, the Agency conducts a
technical review of the petition,
material submitted with the petition and
any additional information. 49 U.S.C.
30162(a)(2); 49 CFR 552.6. The technical
review may consist solely of a review of
information already in the possession of
the Agency or it may include the
collection of information from the motor
vehicle manufacturer and/or other
sources. After conducting the technical
review and considering appropriate
factors, which may include, but are not
limited to, the nature of the complaint,
allocation of Agency resources, Agency
priorities, the likelihood of uncovering
sufficient evidence to establish the
existence of a defect and the likelihood
of success in any necessary enforcement
litigation, the Agency will grant or deny
the petition. See 49 U.S.C. 30162(a)(2);
49 CFR 552.8.
Background Information
In a letter dated December 12, 2019,
the petitioner, Mr. V.T. Wakefield,
requested that NHTSA initiate an
investigation into passenger
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Oct 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
compartment fires in Model Years (MY)
2006–2010 Saturn Sky and Pontiac
Solstice vehicles. The petitioner alleged
the fires were caused by the overheating
of the HVAC blower motor connector.
The petitioner further alleged that
Saturn Sky and Pontiac Solstice
vehicles experience the same electrical
problem (overheating HVAC blower
resistor) addressed by NHTSA Safety
Recall 15V–421, which involved
MY2006–2010 Hummer H3 and 2009–
2010 Hummer H3T vehicles. The
petitioner’s complaint reported that the
affected parts in the Sky and Solstice
vehicles are identical to those covered
by Recall 15V–421.
NHTSA has based its decision on a
review of the material cited by the
petitioner in his complaint and petition,
information submitted by GM in
response to the Agency’s information
request letter, and other pertinent
information in NHTSA’s databases.
Summary of the Petition
The petitioner alleges that MY2006–
2010 Saturn Sky and Pontiac Solstice
vehicles can pose a fire risk due to the
overheating of the HVAC blower motor
connectors. The petitioner cites the fact
the Sky and Solstice vehicles use the
same blower motor parts as the Hummer
H3 and H3T vehicles that were recalled
under Safety Recall 15V–421 for a
potential fire risk.
GM filed Safety Recall 15V–421 on
June 15, 2015 to remedy the connector
module that controls the blower motor
speed in the HVAC system of MY2006–
2010 Hummer H3 and 2009–2010
Hummer H3T vehicles. The module
may overheat under extended
operational periods at high and
medium-high blower speeds in those
vehicles. The recall followed eleven (11)
related fires affecting a fleet of 165,000
vehicles with five to ten years of time
in service.
Office of Defects Investigation Analysis
An analysis of General Motors (GM)
complaint data and information in
NHTSA’s databases identified thirteen
unique vehicle identification numbers
(VINs) with reported incidents that
could pertain to blower motor
overheating, smoking, or melting in the
90,938 MY2006–2010 Saturn Sky and
Pontiac Solstice vehicles produced. Two
of the thirteen cited incidents reported
smoke and thermal damage that may be
attributed to the HVAC blower motor
although neither incident was
confirmed through vehicle inspection.
One incident was with a MY2008
Saturn Sky that had substantial field
exposure including a frontal crash that
occurred one month prior to the August
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62495
2017 thermal incident. The Saturn Sky
thermal incident was reported as plastic
dripping from the dash and a fire in the
carpet. A root cause could not be
identified for this thermal event.
The other incident was with a
MY2007 Pontiac Solstice. The owner
did not inform the manufacturer nor
take their vehicle to a dealer for
evaluation after reporting an electrical
smell and observing smoke in the glove
box in December 2016. No inspection of
the vehicle was conducted.
Most of the 13 incidents reported an
overheated or discolored connector with
attendant loss of HVAC blower fan
function. GM reported 354 warranty
claims with the subject components for
the Sky and Solstice, none of which
included a report of fire and only one
report of smoke. Over a period of ten to
fourteen years in service, there are two
reports of smoke or thermal damage.
While the subject Sky and Solstice
vehicles and the recalled Hummer H3
and H3T vehicles do share common
components, the Sky and Solstice
vehicles have demonstrated very
different behavior and the HVAC system
has a lower power draw than the
recalled Hummer H3 and H3T vehicles.
The recalled H3 and H3T vehicles
generate over triple the failure rate of
the Sky and Solstice vehicles. GM
suggested in its response to the
Agency’s information request that this
difference was due to the larger interior
volume of a recalled Hummer vehicle
imposing a heavier electrical load and
duty cycle on its HVAC blower. The
duty cycle is defined as how long it
takes for the vehicle to cool down
enough before the HVAC blower motor
fan speed is lowered or turned off
completely.
Additionally, due to the size
differential between the Sky and
Solstice vehicles and the recalled
Hummer H3 and H3T vehicles, the parts
have a different power draw. The Sky
and Solstice vehicles, due to their
smaller size, draw less wattage, which
reduces the likelihood of a thermal
event. This condition in the Sky and
Solstice vehicles typically leads to an
inoperable HVAC blower motor as
opposed to a thermal event.
Despite the commonality of parts in
the Sky and Solstice vehicles with those
that were the basis of a safety recall, the
subject vehicles have not demonstrated
a safety defect trend that would likely
lead to a safety recall or merit further
investigation by the Agency. The subject
vehicles have a low rate of reported
thermal events over the ten to fourteen
years they have been in service with the
most recent occurring in 2017. The
HVAC blower motor was not confirmed
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
62496
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2022 / Notices
to be the root cause for either thermal
event cited above.
After thoroughly assessing the
material submitted by the petitioner,
information already in NHTSA’s
possession, information submitted by
GM in response to an information
request, and the potential risks to safety
implicated by the petitioner’s allegation,
NHTSA does not believe that the
petition warrants a formal investigation
at this time. Consequently, the petition
is denied. As with all potential motor
vehicle safety risks, NHTSA will
continue to review any new information
or incidents as they are submitted to the
Agency. The denial of this petition does
not foreclose the Agency from taking
further action if warranted or making a
future finding that a safety-related
defect exists based on additional
information the Agency may receive.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30162(d);
delegations of authority at CFR1.95 and
501.8.
Anne L. Collins,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2022–22394 Filed 10–13–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2022–0034]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Compliance Labeling
Warning Devices
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for public
comment on the reinstatement of a
previously approved collection of
information.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) summarized
below, regarding the reinstatement of a
previously approved collection of
information on Federal Motor vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 125, will
be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and
approval. The ICR describes the labeling
requirement for warning devices and its
expected burden. A Federal Register
Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following
information collection was published on
May 3, 2022. No comments were
received.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Oct 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
Comments must be submitted on
or before November 14, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing burden, should
be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
To find this particular information
collection, select ‘‘Currently under
Review—Open for Public Comment’’ or
use the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or access to
background documents, contact Toyoaki
Nogami, Office of Crash Avoidance
Standards, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, West Building—
4th Floor—Room W43–462, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. He can be reached at (202) 366–
1810. Please identify the relevant
collection of information by referring to
its OMB Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), a Federal
agency must receive approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) before it collects certain
information from the public and a
person is not required to respond to a
collection of information by a Federal
agency unless the collection displays a
valid OMB control number. In
compliance with these requirements,
this notice announces that the following
information collection request will be
submitted OMB.
A Federal Register notice with a 60day comment period soliciting public
comments on the following information
collection was published on May 3,
2022 (87 FR 26253).
Title: 49 CFR 571.125. Standard No.
125; Warning devices, Compliance
Labeling of Warning Devices.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0506.
Type of Request: Reinstatement of a
previously approved information.
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
Length of Approval Requested: Three
years from date of approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: The National Traffic and
Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966,
authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation (NHTSA by delegation),
at 49 U.S.C. 30111 to issue Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) that set performance standards
for motor vehicles and items of motor
vehicle equipment. 49 U.S.C. 30115
(https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/
49/30115) requires manufacturers of
motor vehicles or motor vehicle
equipment to certify that the vehicle or
equipment complies with applicable
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
motor vehicle safety standards
prescribed under this chapter. Section
30115 further specifies that certification
of equipment may be shown by a label
or tag on the equipment or on the
outside of the container in which the
equipment is delivered to certify that
items of motor vehicle equipment
subject to FMVSS comply with all
applicable standards. Further, the
Secretary (NHTSA by delegation) is
authorized, at 49 U.S.C. 30117 (https://
www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/49/
30117), to require manufacturers to
provide information to first purchasers
of motor vehicles or motor vehicle
equipment when the vehicle or
equipment is purchased, in the form of
printed matter placed in the vehicle or
attached to the vehicle or motor vehicle
equipment.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 125, ‘‘Warning
devices’’ specifies requirements for
devices, without self-containing energy
sources, that are designed to be carried
in buses and trucks with a Gross Vehicle
Weight Rating (GVWR) greater than
10,000 pounds, although they can be
carried in other vehicles. These devices
are used to warn approaching traffic of
the presence of a stopped vehicle. This
requirement does not apply to devices
designed to be permanently affixed to
the vehicle. The purpose of the standard
is to reduce deaths and injuries due to
rear end collisions between moving
traffic and disabled vehicles. To ensure
that the warning devices provide
effective warnings to approaching traffic
of the presence of a stopped vehicle, the
standard sets forth specific requirements
for the chromaticity of the reflex
reflective material and fluorescent
material affixed to both faces of the
device.
In addition to performance
requirements, the FMVSS No. 125
requires manufacturers to permanently
and legibly mark their warning devices
with (a) the manufacturer’s name, (b)
the month and year of manufacture, and
(c) the symbol DOT, or the statement
that the warning device complies with
all applicable FMVSS. Manufacturers
must also provide, with each warning
device they manufacture, instructions
printed or attached to the device in a
manner that cannot easily be removed,
for the operator to understand its
erection and placement and a
recommendation that the driver activate
the vehicle hazard warning signal lamps
before leaving the vehicle.
Since the last notice, the total burden
hours were revised from one hour to
three hours based on the number of
respondents and required reporting
tasks. The total annual cost burden was
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62494-62496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22394]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2020-0071]
Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition, DP20-002
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Denial of a petition for a defect investigation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the reasons for the denial of a defect
petition, DP20-002, submitted by Mr. V.T. Wakefield (the Petitioner) to
NHTSA (the Agency) by a letter dated December 12, 2019. The petition
[[Page 62495]]
requested that the Agency initiate a safety defect investigation of
passenger compartment fires attributed to HVAC blower motor connectors
overheating in Model Year (MY) 2006-2010 Pontiac Solstice and Saturn
Sky vehicles (the ``subject vehicles''). After conducting a technical
review of: (1) consumer complaints identified by the petitioner; (2)
consumer complaint information in NHTSA's databases; and (3)
information provided by General Motors (GM) in response to the Agency's
information request regarding vehicle fires and complaints received by
GM, NHTSA's Office of Defect Investigations (ODI) has concluded that
the issues raised by the petition do not warrant a defect
investigation. Accordingly, the Agency has denied the petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alexander Argant, Vehicle Defect
Division A, Office of Defects Investigation, NHTSA 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: 202-366-8787. Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
Interested persons may petition NHTSA requesting that the Agency
initiate an investigation to determine whether a motor vehicle or an
item of replacement equipment does not comply with an applicable motor
vehicle safety standard or contains a defect that relates to motor
vehicle safety. 49 U.S.C. 30162(a)(2); 49 CFR 552.1. Upon receipt of a
properly filed petition, the Agency conducts a technical review of the
petition, material submitted with the petition and any additional
information. 49 U.S.C. 30162(a)(2); 49 CFR 552.6. The technical review
may consist solely of a review of information already in the possession
of the Agency or it may include the collection of information from the
motor vehicle manufacturer and/or other sources. After conducting the
technical review and considering appropriate factors, which may
include, but are not limited to, the nature of the complaint,
allocation of Agency resources, Agency priorities, the likelihood of
uncovering sufficient evidence to establish the existence of a defect
and the likelihood of success in any necessary enforcement litigation,
the Agency will grant or deny the petition. See 49 U.S.C. 30162(a)(2);
49 CFR 552.8.
Background Information
In a letter dated December 12, 2019, the petitioner, Mr. V.T.
Wakefield, requested that NHTSA initiate an investigation into
passenger compartment fires in Model Years (MY) 2006-2010 Saturn Sky
and Pontiac Solstice vehicles. The petitioner alleged the fires were
caused by the overheating of the HVAC blower motor connector. The
petitioner further alleged that Saturn Sky and Pontiac Solstice
vehicles experience the same electrical problem (overheating HVAC
blower resistor) addressed by NHTSA Safety Recall 15V-421, which
involved MY2006-2010 Hummer H3 and 2009-2010 Hummer H3T vehicles. The
petitioner's complaint reported that the affected parts in the Sky and
Solstice vehicles are identical to those covered by Recall 15V-421.
NHTSA has based its decision on a review of the material cited by
the petitioner in his complaint and petition, information submitted by
GM in response to the Agency's information request letter, and other
pertinent information in NHTSA's databases.
Summary of the Petition
The petitioner alleges that MY2006-2010 Saturn Sky and Pontiac
Solstice vehicles can pose a fire risk due to the overheating of the
HVAC blower motor connectors. The petitioner cites the fact the Sky and
Solstice vehicles use the same blower motor parts as the Hummer H3 and
H3T vehicles that were recalled under Safety Recall 15V-421 for a
potential fire risk.
GM filed Safety Recall 15V-421 on June 15, 2015 to remedy the
connector module that controls the blower motor speed in the HVAC
system of MY2006-2010 Hummer H3 and 2009-2010 Hummer H3T vehicles. The
module may overheat under extended operational periods at high and
medium-high blower speeds in those vehicles. The recall followed eleven
(11) related fires affecting a fleet of 165,000 vehicles with five to
ten years of time in service.
Office of Defects Investigation Analysis
An analysis of General Motors (GM) complaint data and information
in NHTSA's databases identified thirteen unique vehicle identification
numbers (VINs) with reported incidents that could pertain to blower
motor overheating, smoking, or melting in the 90,938 MY2006-2010 Saturn
Sky and Pontiac Solstice vehicles produced. Two of the thirteen cited
incidents reported smoke and thermal damage that may be attributed to
the HVAC blower motor although neither incident was confirmed through
vehicle inspection. One incident was with a MY2008 Saturn Sky that had
substantial field exposure including a frontal crash that occurred one
month prior to the August 2017 thermal incident. The Saturn Sky thermal
incident was reported as plastic dripping from the dash and a fire in
the carpet. A root cause could not be identified for this thermal
event.
The other incident was with a MY2007 Pontiac Solstice. The owner
did not inform the manufacturer nor take their vehicle to a dealer for
evaluation after reporting an electrical smell and observing smoke in
the glove box in December 2016. No inspection of the vehicle was
conducted.
Most of the 13 incidents reported an overheated or discolored
connector with attendant loss of HVAC blower fan function. GM reported
354 warranty claims with the subject components for the Sky and
Solstice, none of which included a report of fire and only one report
of smoke. Over a period of ten to fourteen years in service, there are
two reports of smoke or thermal damage.
While the subject Sky and Solstice vehicles and the recalled Hummer
H3 and H3T vehicles do share common components, the Sky and Solstice
vehicles have demonstrated very different behavior and the HVAC system
has a lower power draw than the recalled Hummer H3 and H3T vehicles.
The recalled H3 and H3T vehicles generate over triple the failure rate
of the Sky and Solstice vehicles. GM suggested in its response to the
Agency's information request that this difference was due to the larger
interior volume of a recalled Hummer vehicle imposing a heavier
electrical load and duty cycle on its HVAC blower. The duty cycle is
defined as how long it takes for the vehicle to cool down enough before
the HVAC blower motor fan speed is lowered or turned off completely.
Additionally, due to the size differential between the Sky and
Solstice vehicles and the recalled Hummer H3 and H3T vehicles, the
parts have a different power draw. The Sky and Solstice vehicles, due
to their smaller size, draw less wattage, which reduces the likelihood
of a thermal event. This condition in the Sky and Solstice vehicles
typically leads to an inoperable HVAC blower motor as opposed to a
thermal event.
Despite the commonality of parts in the Sky and Solstice vehicles
with those that were the basis of a safety recall, the subject vehicles
have not demonstrated a safety defect trend that would likely lead to a
safety recall or merit further investigation by the Agency. The subject
vehicles have a low rate of reported thermal events over the ten to
fourteen years they have been in service with the most recent occurring
in 2017. The HVAC blower motor was not confirmed
[[Page 62496]]
to be the root cause for either thermal event cited above.
After thoroughly assessing the material submitted by the
petitioner, information already in NHTSA's possession, information
submitted by GM in response to an information request, and the
potential risks to safety implicated by the petitioner's allegation,
NHTSA does not believe that the petition warrants a formal
investigation at this time. Consequently, the petition is denied. As
with all potential motor vehicle safety risks, NHTSA will continue to
review any new information or incidents as they are submitted to the
Agency. The denial of this petition does not foreclose the Agency from
taking further action if warranted or making a future finding that a
safety-related defect exists based on additional information the Agency
may receive.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30162(d); delegations of authority at CFR1.95
and 501.8.
Anne L. Collins,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2022-22394 Filed 10-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P