Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for Comment; Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS), Non-Traffic Surveillance (NTS) and Special Studies Data Collection, 58905-58909 [2022-21037]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2022 / Notices
f. Vehicle company number and
power unit license plate State and
number;
g. Number of individuals suffering
physical injury;
h. Number of fatalities;
i. The police-reported cause of the
accident;
j. Whether the driver was cited for
violation of any traffic laws, or motor
carrier safety regulations; and
k. The total driving time and the total
on-duty time of the CMV driver at the
time of the accident.
Termination
The FMCSA does not believe the CLP
holders covered by the exemptions will
experience any deterioration of their
safety record. However, should this
occur, FMCSA will take all steps
necessary to protect the public interest,
including revocation of these
exemptions. The FMCSA will
immediately revoke these exemptions
for failure to comply with the terms and
conditions set forth above.
Robin Hutcheson,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022–20968 Filed 9–27–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. DOT–NHTSA–2922–0049]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Notice and Request for
Comment; Crash Report Sampling
System (CRSS), Non-Traffic
Surveillance (NTS) and Special Studies
Data Collection
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments on a request for extension
with modification of a currently
approved information collection.
AGENCY:
NHTSA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for an extension with
modification of a currently approved
information collection. Before a federal
agency can collect certain information
from the public, it must receive
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). Under procedures
established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB
approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Sep 27, 2022
Jkt 256001
collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatement of
previously approved collections. This
document describes collections of
information for which NHTSA intends
to seek OMB approval that collect for
NHTSA’s Crash Report Sampling
System (CRSS), Non-Traffic
Surveillance (NTS), and special studies.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted by November 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
[identified by Docket No. DOT–
NHTSA–20XX–XXXX] through one of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Go to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax:1–202–493–2251
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except on Federal holidays. To
be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 366–9322 before
coming.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
www.transportation.gov/privacy.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets
via internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or access to
background documents, contact Jonae S.
Anderson, Office of Data Acquisition
(NSA–120), Room W53–470. (202) 366–
1028, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, Please identify
the relevant collection of information by
referring to its OMB Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58905
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency
submits a proposed collection of
information to OMB for approval, it
must first publish a document in the
Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulation (at
5CFR 1320.8(d), an agency must ask for
public comment on the following: (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) how to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) how to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed
collections of information for which the
agency is seeking approval from OMB.
Title: Crash Report Sampling System
(CRSS), Non-Traffic Surveillance
System (NTS), and Special Studies.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0714.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection of
information.
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: 3 years from date of approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: NHTSA is authorized by
49 U.S.C. 30182 and 23 U.S.C. 403 to
collect data on motor vehicle traffic
crashes to aid in the identification of
issues and the development,
implementation, and evaluation of
motor vehicle and highway safety
countermeasures to reduce fatalities and
the property damage associated with
motor vehicle crashes. Using this
authority, NHTSA established the Crash
Report Sampling System (CRSS), CRSS
related Special Studies and the NonTraffic Surveillance (NTS). Through
these efforts, NHTSA collects data on
motor vehicle crashes, including crashes
involving injuries and fatalities,
property damage only crashes, as well
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
58906
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2022 / Notices
as non-traffic crashes that involve
injuries and fatalities. NHTSA uses
information from these data collections
to support NHTSA’s mission to save
lives, prevent injuries, and reduce
economic losses resulting from motor
vehicle crashes.
Since late 1970s, NHTSA’s National
Center for Statistics and Analysis
(NCSA) has utilized a multidisciplinary
approach to meet the data needs of our
end users that leverages an efficient
combination of census, sample-based,
and existing State files to provide
information on traffic crashes on a
timely basis. Beginning in 2016, the
CRSS has been used to identify highway
safety problem areas and provide
general data trends. The Non-Traffic
Surveillance System (NTS) provides
data regarding fatalities and injuries that
occur in non-traffic crashes and noncrash incidents.
CRSS obtains data from a nationally
representative probability sample
selected from police reported motor
vehicle traffic crashes. Specifically,
CRSS collects data on crashes involving
at least one motor vehicle in transport
on a trafficway that resulted in property
damage, injury or a fatality will be
included in the CRSS sample. The crash
reports sampled will be chosen from
selected areas that reflect the geography,
population, miles driven, and the
number of crashes in the United States.
No additional data beyond the selected
crash reports will be collected. Once the
crash reports are received, they will be
coded and the data will be entered into
the CRSS Records Based Information
Solution (RBIS), the repository for CRSS
cases and reporting tools.
CRSS will acquire nationally
representative information on fatalities,
injuries and property damage directly
from existing State police crash reports.
The user population includes Federal
and State agencies, automobile
manufacturers, insurance companies,
and the private sector. Annual changes
in the sample parameters are minor in
terms of operation and method of data
collection, and do not affect the
reporting burden on respondents.
The Non-Traffic Surveillance (NTS) is
a data collection effort for collecting
information about counts and details
regarding fatalities and injuries that
occur in non-traffic crashes and noncrash incidents. Non-traffic crashes are
crashes that occur off a public trafficway
(e.g., private roads, parking lots, or
driveways), and non-crash incidents are
incidents involving motor vehicles but
do not involve a crash scenario, such as
carbon monoxide poisoning and hypo/
hyperthermia. NTS non-traffic crash
data are obtained through NHTSA’s data
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Sep 27, 2022
Jkt 256001
collection efforts for the Crash Report
Sampling System (CRSS), the Crash
Investigation Sampling System (CISS),1
and the Fatality Analysis Reporting
System (FARS) 2. NTS also includes
data outside of NHTSA’s own data
collections. NTS’ non-crash injury data
is based upon emergency department
records from a special study conducted
by the Consumer Product Safety
Commission’s National Electronic Injury
Surveillance System (NEISS) All Injury
Program. NTS non-crash fatality data is
derived from death certificate
information from the Centers for Disease
Control’s National Vital Statistics
System.
For the NTS data collection this
notice only discusses for the non-traffic
crash portion that is collected using
methods for the CRSS data collection.
The non-traffic crash data that feed into
NTS from the FARS and CISS data
collection efforts are covered under
information collection clearances for
those data collection efforts. This is
done because the data is collected
differently under each of NHTSA’s three
data collection efforts. During the CRSS
and CISS sampling process, NTS
applicable crashes will be chosen from
the same sample sites. The FARS data
collection effort uncovers NTS
applicable reports received from the
State during their normal data collection
activities for FARS. Therefore, the
burden for NTS is included in each
study’s calculation. No additional data
will be collected beyond the NTS
applicable reports. Once the crash
reports are received, each case will be
coded and entered into the NTS RBIS
application. NHTSA uses NTS data to
estimate fatalities and injuries in nontraffic crashes, which are crashes which
occur off the trafficways such as
nonpublic roads, driveways, and
parking lots.
In addition to CRSS data collection,
NHTSA may require special studies to
further analyze motor vehicle crashes in
the CRSS jurisdictions. One type of
special study is the collection of data
from the non-sampled crashes from
CRSS Police Jurisdictions (PJs) by the
crash report Strata, NTS applicable, or
out of scope, to help assess the accuracy
of the PJ frame. Non-sample PJs are
defined as PJs that investigate motor
vehicle crashes within the CRSS PSU
boundaries but are not sampled through
the CRSS study.
1 NHTSA’s information collection for CISS is
covered by the ICR with OMB Control No. 2127–
0706.
2 NHTSA’s information collection for FARS is
covered by the ICR with OMB Control No. 2127–
0006.
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Another special study NHTSA may
require is the CRSS PJ frame evaluation.
The PJ frame is constantly changing:
new PJs start operating, existing PJs are
closed, multiple PJs are merged into one
PJ, or one PJ splits into multiple PJs.
The current CRSS PJ sample was
selected from the 2016 PJ frame and the
PJ weights were calculated accordingly.
If the PJ frame has changed dramatically
from the 2016 PJ frame, the CRSS PJ
weights are no longer correct and the
CRSS estimates may be biased. To
prevent this, NHTSA needs to evaluate
the current PJ frame to identify all PJs
that currently generate PCRs for the
sampled non-Electronic Data Transfer
(EDT) PSUs and collect 6 crash counts
(total crashes, fatal crashes, injury
crashes, pedestrian crashes, motorcycle
crashes, and commercial motor vehicle
crashes). The EDT is the nightly transfer
of crash data. EDT PSUs have been
collapsed into one PJ and sample crash
reports throughout the county. Thus, the
concern of completeness of the PJ frame
in EDT PSUs, isn’t an issue.
Additionally, this study is different
from the non-sample count special
study, because the six crash counts are
unrelated to CRSS or NTS applicability.
These crash counts will be used as PJ
measurement of size for PJ sample
selection or PJ weight adjustment if
needed.
NHTSA is seeking approval to modify
the existing information collection to (a)
reduce the burden hour estimates for
CRSS information collection to account
for previous inflated estimates and
current efficiencies and (b) add the nonsampled Special Study into this
package. The combined impact is an
increase of 7,000 burden hours to
NHTSA’s overall total.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information
NHTSA’s mission is to save lives,
prevent injuries, and reduce economic
losses resulting from motor vehicle
crashes. In order to accomplish this
mission, NHTSA needs high-quality
data on motor vehicle crashes. The
CRSS supports this mission by
providing the agency with vital
information about a nationally
representative sample involving motor
vehicle traffic crashes that occur on our
nation’s roadways.
CRSS data is used extensively by all
the NHTSA program and research
offices, other DOT modes, States, and
local jurisdictions. The highway
research community uses the CRSS data
for trend analysis, problem
identification, and program evaluation.
Congress uses the CRSS data for making
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2022 / Notices
decisions concerning safety programs.
The CRSS data is made publicly
available to anyone interested in
highway safety.
The NTS is a Congressionally
mandated data collection effort, which
provides counts and details regarding
injuries and fatalities that occur in nontraffic crashes and in non-crash
incidents. NTS annual data is used to
produce estimates for injuries and
fatalities in non-traffic crashes. The NTS
data is also made publicly available for
highway safety research purposes.
The special studies such as the nonsample count and PJ frame evaluation
are critical to assessing the quality of the
PJ frame of the CRSS PSUs to determine
PJ weights and measure of size for the
CRSS PJ sample selection. Without the
special studies, NHTSA may fail to
accurately assess the national crash
picture by missing pertinent crash data.
Affected Public: Various Police
Jurisdiction and State Agencies.
Local police jurisdictions (PJs) and
State agencies that collect and maintain
central databases of motor vehicle
crashes partner with NHTSA to provide
access to crash reports for the CRSS
sample sites on a routine basis. CRSS
collects data from sampled police
jurisdictions in order to collect a
nationally representative sample.
However, because CRSS only collects
information from police crash reports
for many jurisdictions, NHTSA is able
to collect the data directly from the
States. This is because States have been
moving toward more electronic and
centralized data collection systems.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
NHTSA estimates that approximately 28
States and 44 police jurisdictions will
provide crash data to support CRSS in
each of the next three years. Because the
portion of NTS data that comes from the
CRSS data collection relies on the CRSS
data collection methodologies, NHTSA
estimates that the same 72 respondents
will also provide data to NHTSA
through the CRSS data collection effort.
The estimated number of respondents
for the non-sample count special study
is approximately 136 PJs. The estimated
number of respondents for the PJ frame
evaluation is approximately 1,248 PJs.
Frequency: Varies. The frequency of
providing crash reports is established by
the local PJs and state agencies.
Typically, weekly, or bi-weekly access
to crash reports is provided.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Sep 27, 2022
Jkt 256001
Estimated Number of Responses
Annually: NHTSA estimates 677,005
crash reports, which includes both the
CRSS and NTS crashes from the sample
PJs. However, of the 677,005 crashes, it
is estimated that 3,000 of those will be
NTS applicable crashes and thus
remainder could be CRSS applicable
crashes is 674,005. Additionally, it is
estimated that the non-sample special
studies will generate 247,110 crashes
from the non-sample PJs. The number of
crashes for the PJ frame evaluation will
be estimated at the total of crash reports
generated from combining the sample
and non-sample PJs to derive the six
crash counts. Thus, the number of
generated crash reports estimated is
677,005 + 247,110 = 1,410,551 crashes.
Estimated
number of
crashes
Study
CRSS ........................................
NTS ...........................................
Non-Sample Special Study ......
PJ Frame Evaluation Special
Study .....................................
674,005
3,000
247,100
1,410,551
Grand Total .......................
1,410,551
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 42,680 Hours.
Within the 30 States or 60 CRSS
Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) there
are Police Jurisdictions (PJs), from
which a CRSS sampler must obtain
crash reports for listing, categorization,
and sampling. Currently, 50 PSUs
provide NHTSA data electronically—
through EDT, State website access, or
web service portal. For one State, the
crash reports are obtained through EDT
and manually since not all crashes are
reported through EDT. Therefore,
NHTSA counted that state more than
once due to the crash report acquisition
method. However, there is a total of 10
PSUs, or 21 local PJs, where crash
reports collection is conducted in the
field using a combination of electronic
and manual methods as dictated by the
sample PJ’s crash report collection
methods. These PJs required field
samplers which incur an increased
burden due to the labor-intensive
administrative practices and privacy
protections associated with manually
accessing the crash reports. The total
respondents doesn’t equal to 30 States
or 60 PSUs, due to the variation in
accessing crash reports throughout the
sample.
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58907
The annual burden estimate detailed
in Table 1 is produced by identifying
the crash report access method for each
PSU and PJ and assigning the
appropriate burden hours for that
method as outlined below.
• EDT Maintenance—For PSUs
providing crash report through EDT, the
burden is estimated at 5 hours annually.
This accounts for yearly updates to
programming needed to successfully
transmit data, such as updating data
structures if new data elements are
added or any changes to the state made
to their crash report and/or databases.
• State Website—User Access Only:
For PSUs providing crash reports via a
state repository/website or database, the
burden is estimated at 10 hours
annually. This represents time to
process user account requests, establish
credentials, and routine maintenance of
the State’s data repositories.
• State Website—User Access and
Additional Administrative Functions:
For PSUs providing crash reports
directly to NHTSA via web service or
where the State employees provide user
access accounts in addition to regularly
searches for crash reports, compiles the
lists of crashes to send to NHTSA
monthly, the burden is estimated at 60
hours annually. This represents
implementation, data transfer
monitoring, and communications with
NHTSA and its contractors.
• For PSUs providing crash reports to
NHTSA via manual crash report access
methods (i.e., weekly physical visits to
a PJ, copying crash reports and mailing
them, and searching for recently
completed crash reports and uploading
crash reports to secure email links), the
burden is estimated at 470 hours
annually. This represents—but is not
limited to—maintaining a law
enforcement presence while the crash
reports are being reviewed, and/or
providing resources to the CRSS
sampler in order to access the crash
reports. This is the most labor extensive
access type due to the administrative
burden and the additional processes
required to protect PII. Other local
police jurisdictions may photocopy
crash reports and FedEx to the
contractors or download electronic
crash reports to submit electronically
via secure email or thumb drive
monthly.
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
58908
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2022 / Notices
Hours per
jurisdiction
Access method
Total hours
EDT (Maintenance) ......................................................................................................................
State Website (user access only) ................................................................................................
State Website (user access and additional administrative functions) .........................................
Web Service (user access and States query and compile info) .................................................
Mixed Manual ..............................................................................................................................
5
10
60
60
470
14
11
2
1
44
70
110
120
60
20,680
Grand Total ...........................................................................................................................
........................
72
21,040
On an ad-hoc basis, NHTSA requests
a non-sample count special study to
assess the Police Jurisdiction (PJ) frame.
The non-sample count and the PJ Frame
evaluation studies are critical to
assessing the quality of the PJ frame of
the CRSS PSUs to determine PJ weights
and measure of size for the CRSS PJ
sample selection. Without the special
studies, NHTSA may fail to accurately
assess the national crash picture by
missing pertinent crash data.
Number of Respondents: 136 (NonSample Count Special Study).
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 21,307 (Non-Sample Count
Special Study).
The burden calculation for the nonsample count special study is difficult
to determine. Each burden calculation is
associated with the agreed upon crash
report access method for sample sites.
For non-sample PJs we have no
established relationship nor is it known
which type of access to crash report is
feasible. Most importantly, non-sample
count special studies are conducted on
an ad-hoc basis and not implemented
every year. Table 2 illustrates nonsample counts by access method in the
state for sample sites.
EDT has been removed from the table
because CRSS samples from the entire
county, there is no distinction between
the non-sample and sample PJs. This is
an added benefit to EDT
implementation as we get an accurate
assessment of the PSU frame by CRSS
strata. State websites with user access
have non-sample PJs however, there is
no added burden because the initial
access granted is at the state level. State
website with user access and additional
administrative functions provide
NHTSA data at the county level, which
includes both sample and non-sample
PJs, thus there is no additional burden
to the state. Webservice agreements also
provide data at the county level, thus
there is no additional burden to the
state. States noted as having manual
methods only account for the sample
PJs. Without established cooperation,
NHTSA can’t forecast individual PJs
access methods for the purposes of the
burden calculation. Thus, the maximum
burden for the non-sample count special
study’s estimated burden is 21,307 with
the possibility of reduction with
cooperative agreements finalized.
Hours per
jurisdiction
Access method
Number of
respondents—
police
jurisdiction
(PJ) or states
Total hours
State Website (user access only) ................................................................................................
State Website (user access and additional administrative functions) .........................................
Web Service (user access and States query and compile info) .................................................
Manual .........................................................................................................................................
10
60
60
470
0
0
0
136
0
0
0
* 21,307 (470
136/3)
Grand Total ...........................................................................................................................
........................
136
21,307
Number of Respondents: 1,248 (PJ
Frame Evaluation Special Study).
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 333 (PJ Frame Evaluation Special
Study).
The activities associated with PJ
frame evaluation special study include
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Number of
respondents—
police
jurisdiction
(PJ) or states
identifying the in-scope PJs and
contacting the in-scope PJs for the 6
crash counts. NHTSA estimates there
are total 40 non-EDT PSUs and about
1,248 PJs in those non-EDT PSUs.
NHTSA estimates it would about 1
minute per PJ to confirm if any changes
to the PJ since the 2016. NHTSA
anticipates approximately 15 minutes
(0.25 hours) for each PJ to prepare the
6 crash counts. NHTSA estimates the
total number of hours of response
burden is about 333 hours.
Number of
respondents
jurisdiction
(PJ)
PJ frame evaluation
Hours per jurisdiction
Manual ..........................................................................
16 Minutes ....................................................................
1,248
* 333 (16/60
1,248)
Grand Total ...........................................................
.......................................................................................
1,248
333
This hourly burden was calculated
using the Bureau of Labor Statistics’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Sep 27, 2022
Jkt 256001
mean hourly wage estimate for Court,
Municipal, and License Clerks
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total hours
(Standard Occupational Classification
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 28, 2022 / Notices
#43–4031) 3 from May 2021 of $21.57.
Therefore, NHTSA estimates the hourly
wage associated with the estimated
21,040 burden hours to be $453,832.80
(21,040 hours × $21.57 per hour). This
is a reduction of the previously reported
burden of 35,680 labor hours and
estimated costs of $705,036.80. The
efficiencies with the increased
implementation of the EDT and better
understanding of local and state crash
repositories contribute to the reduction
in burden labor hours and subsequent
costs. The Bureau of Labor Statistics
estimates that for State and local
government workers, wages represent
54.96% of total compensation.4
Therefore, the total cost of burden
associated with this collection is
estimated to be $825,751.09
($453,832.80/.5496).
The total burden hours are presented
in the table below but described for each
study.
Total
burden
hours
Study
CRSS ............................................
NTS ...............................................
Non-Sample Special Study ..........
PJ Frame Evaluation Special
Study .........................................
21,040
0
21,307
Grand Total ...........................
42,680
333
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
$0.
NHTSA estimates that there are no
costs associated with this information
collection other than labor costs
associated with burden hours. This is a
drastic decrease from the $1.7 M from
when NHTSA last sought approval for
this information collection. The
decrease in costs is a result of removing
labor costs associated with labor hours
that were included in response to
question 12, but unfortunately were
incorrect.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the
Department’s performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c)
ways for the Department to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and (d) ways
that the burden could be minimized
3 See May 2021 National Industry-Specific
Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, 43–
4031—Court, Municipal, and License Clerks,
available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/
oes434031.htm (accessed May 18, 2022).
4 See Table 1. Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation by ownership (Dec. 2021), available
at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t01.htm
(accessed May 18, 2022).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Sep 27, 2022
Jkt 256001
58909
without reducing the quality of the
collected information. The agency will
summarize and/or include your
comments in the request for OMB’s
clearance of this information collection.
You are asked to comment on any
aspects of this information collection,
including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Department’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed information collection; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as
amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order
1351.29A.
Electronic Availability
The Specially Designated Nationals
and Blocked Persons List and additional
information concerning OFAC sanctions
programs are available on OFAC’s
website (www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Chou Lin Chen,
Associate Administrator, National Center for
Statistics and Analysis.
BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
[FR Doc. 2022–21037 Filed 9–27–22; 8:45 am]
Notice of OFAC Action
On September 15, 2022, OFAC
updated the Specially Designated
Nationals and Blocked Persons List
entry for the following vessel, in which
a blocked person has an interest and
continues to be blocked pursuant to the
prohibitions in Executive Order 13726.
Vessel
1. BONU 5 Malta flag; Vessel
Registration Identification 15411 (Malta)
(vessel) [LIBYA3] (Linked To: ANDREA
MARTINA LIMITED).
Dated: September 15, 2022.
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control,
U.S. Department of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2022–20348 Filed 9–27–22; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names
AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets
of one or more persons that have been
Control, Treasury.
placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated
ACTION: Notice.
Nationals and Blocked Persons List
(SDN List) based on OFAC’s
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the
determination that one or more
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing an update applicable legal criteria were satisfied.
All property and interests in property
to the identifying information of one
subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these
vessel currently included on the
persons are blocked, and U.S. persons
Specially Designated Nationals and
are generally prohibited from engaging
Blocked Persons List. The vessel
in transactions with them. Additionally,
remains the blocked property of a
OFAC is publishing updates to the
person who has an interest under the
identifying information of one person
relevant sanctions authority listed
currently included on the SDN List.
below.
OFAC is further publishing the name of
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
one person that has been removed from
section for applicable date(s).
the SDN List.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 202– section for effective date(s).
622–2490; Associate Director for Global FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420; Assistant OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.:
Director for Sanctions Compliance &
202–622–2490; Associate Director for
Evaluation, tel.: 202–622–2490;
Global Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420;
Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.:
Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.:
202–622–2480; or Assistant Director for 202–622–2480; Assistant Director for
Regulatory Affairs, tel. 202–622–4855.
Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202–622–4855;
or the Assistant Director for Sanctions
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58905-58909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21037]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. DOT-NHTSA-2922-0049]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for
Comment; Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS), Non-Traffic Surveillance
(NTS) and Special Studies Data Collection
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments on a request for extension with
modification of a currently approved information collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA invites public comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for an extension with
modification of a currently approved information collection. Before a
federal agency can collect certain information from the public, it must
receive approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Under
procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before
seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on
proposed collections of information, including extensions and
reinstatement of previously approved collections. This document
describes collections of information for which NHTSA intends to seek
OMB approval that collect for NHTSA's Crash Report Sampling System
(CRSS), Non-Traffic Surveillance (NTS), and special studies.
DATES: Written comments should be submitted by November 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by Docket No. DOT-NHTSA-
20XX-XXXX] through one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Go to the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
Fax:1-202-493-2251
Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except on Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there
to help you, please call (202) 366-9322 before coming.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets via internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or access
to background documents, contact Jonae S. Anderson, Office of Data
Acquisition (NSA-120), Room W53-470. (202) 366-1028, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, Please identify the relevant
collection of information by referring to its OMB Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies
concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5CFR 1320.8(d), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) how to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed collections of information for which
the agency is seeking approval from OMB.
Title: Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS), Non-Traffic
Surveillance System (NTS), and Special Studies.
OMB Control Number: 2127-0714.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection of
information.
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information: NHTSA is authorized by 49
U.S.C. 30182 and 23 U.S.C. 403 to collect data on motor vehicle traffic
crashes to aid in the identification of issues and the development,
implementation, and evaluation of motor vehicle and highway safety
countermeasures to reduce fatalities and the property damage associated
with motor vehicle crashes. Using this authority, NHTSA established the
Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS), CRSS related Special Studies and
the Non-Traffic Surveillance (NTS). Through these efforts, NHTSA
collects data on motor vehicle crashes, including crashes involving
injuries and fatalities, property damage only crashes, as well
[[Page 58906]]
as non-traffic crashes that involve injuries and fatalities. NHTSA uses
information from these data collections to support NHTSA's mission to
save lives, prevent injuries, and reduce economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes.
Since late 1970s, NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and
Analysis (NCSA) has utilized a multidisciplinary approach to meet the
data needs of our end users that leverages an efficient combination of
census, sample-based, and existing State files to provide information
on traffic crashes on a timely basis. Beginning in 2016, the CRSS has
been used to identify highway safety problem areas and provide general
data trends. The Non-Traffic Surveillance System (NTS) provides data
regarding fatalities and injuries that occur in non-traffic crashes and
non-crash incidents.
CRSS obtains data from a nationally representative probability
sample selected from police reported motor vehicle traffic crashes.
Specifically, CRSS collects data on crashes involving at least one
motor vehicle in transport on a trafficway that resulted in property
damage, injury or a fatality will be included in the CRSS sample. The
crash reports sampled will be chosen from selected areas that reflect
the geography, population, miles driven, and the number of crashes in
the United States. No additional data beyond the selected crash reports
will be collected. Once the crash reports are received, they will be
coded and the data will be entered into the CRSS Records Based
Information Solution (RBIS), the repository for CRSS cases and
reporting tools.
CRSS will acquire nationally representative information on
fatalities, injuries and property damage directly from existing State
police crash reports. The user population includes Federal and State
agencies, automobile manufacturers, insurance companies, and the
private sector. Annual changes in the sample parameters are minor in
terms of operation and method of data collection, and do not affect the
reporting burden on respondents.
The Non-Traffic Surveillance (NTS) is a data collection effort for
collecting information about counts and details regarding fatalities
and injuries that occur in non-traffic crashes and non-crash incidents.
Non-traffic crashes are crashes that occur off a public trafficway
(e.g., private roads, parking lots, or driveways), and non-crash
incidents are incidents involving motor vehicles but do not involve a
crash scenario, such as carbon monoxide poisoning and hypo/
hyperthermia. NTS non-traffic crash data are obtained through NHTSA's
data collection efforts for the Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS),
the Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS),\1\ and the Fatality
Analysis Reporting System (FARS) \2\. NTS also includes data outside of
NHTSA's own data collections. NTS' non-crash injury data is based upon
emergency department records from a special study conducted by the
Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury
Surveillance System (NEISS) All Injury Program. NTS non-crash fatality
data is derived from death certificate information from the Centers for
Disease Control's National Vital Statistics System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ NHTSA's information collection for CISS is covered by the
ICR with OMB Control No. 2127-0706.
\2\ NHTSA's information collection for FARS is covered by the
ICR with OMB Control No. 2127-0006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the NTS data collection this notice only discusses for the non-
traffic crash portion that is collected using methods for the CRSS data
collection. The non-traffic crash data that feed into NTS from the FARS
and CISS data collection efforts are covered under information
collection clearances for those data collection efforts. This is done
because the data is collected differently under each of NHTSA's three
data collection efforts. During the CRSS and CISS sampling process, NTS
applicable crashes will be chosen from the same sample sites. The FARS
data collection effort uncovers NTS applicable reports received from
the State during their normal data collection activities for FARS.
Therefore, the burden for NTS is included in each study's calculation.
No additional data will be collected beyond the NTS applicable reports.
Once the crash reports are received, each case will be coded and
entered into the NTS RBIS application. NHTSA uses NTS data to estimate
fatalities and injuries in non-traffic crashes, which are crashes which
occur off the trafficways such as nonpublic roads, driveways, and
parking lots.
In addition to CRSS data collection, NHTSA may require special
studies to further analyze motor vehicle crashes in the CRSS
jurisdictions. One type of special study is the collection of data from
the non-sampled crashes from CRSS Police Jurisdictions (PJs) by the
crash report Strata, NTS applicable, or out of scope, to help assess
the accuracy of the PJ frame. Non-sample PJs are defined as PJs that
investigate motor vehicle crashes within the CRSS PSU boundaries but
are not sampled through the CRSS study.
Another special study NHTSA may require is the CRSS PJ frame
evaluation. The PJ frame is constantly changing: new PJs start
operating, existing PJs are closed, multiple PJs are merged into one
PJ, or one PJ splits into multiple PJs. The current CRSS PJ sample was
selected from the 2016 PJ frame and the PJ weights were calculated
accordingly. If the PJ frame has changed dramatically from the 2016 PJ
frame, the CRSS PJ weights are no longer correct and the CRSS estimates
may be biased. To prevent this, NHTSA needs to evaluate the current PJ
frame to identify all PJs that currently generate PCRs for the sampled
non-Electronic Data Transfer (EDT) PSUs and collect 6 crash counts
(total crashes, fatal crashes, injury crashes, pedestrian crashes,
motorcycle crashes, and commercial motor vehicle crashes). The EDT is
the nightly transfer of crash data. EDT PSUs have been collapsed into
one PJ and sample crash reports throughout the county. Thus, the
concern of completeness of the PJ frame in EDT PSUs, isn't an issue.
Additionally, this study is different from the non-sample count special
study, because the six crash counts are unrelated to CRSS or NTS
applicability. These crash counts will be used as PJ measurement of
size for PJ sample selection or PJ weight adjustment if needed.
NHTSA is seeking approval to modify the existing information
collection to (a) reduce the burden hour estimates for CRSS information
collection to account for previous inflated estimates and current
efficiencies and (b) add the non-sampled Special Study into this
package. The combined impact is an increase of 7,000 burden hours to
NHTSA's overall total.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information
NHTSA's mission is to save lives, prevent injuries, and reduce
economic losses resulting from motor vehicle crashes. In order to
accomplish this mission, NHTSA needs high-quality data on motor vehicle
crashes. The CRSS supports this mission by providing the agency with
vital information about a nationally representative sample involving
motor vehicle traffic crashes that occur on our nation's roadways.
CRSS data is used extensively by all the NHTSA program and research
offices, other DOT modes, States, and local jurisdictions. The highway
research community uses the CRSS data for trend analysis, problem
identification, and program evaluation. Congress uses the CRSS data for
making
[[Page 58907]]
decisions concerning safety programs. The CRSS data is made publicly
available to anyone interested in highway safety.
The NTS is a Congressionally mandated data collection effort, which
provides counts and details regarding injuries and fatalities that
occur in non-traffic crashes and in non-crash incidents. NTS annual
data is used to produce estimates for injuries and fatalities in non-
traffic crashes. The NTS data is also made publicly available for
highway safety research purposes.
The special studies such as the non-sample count and PJ frame
evaluation are critical to assessing the quality of the PJ frame of the
CRSS PSUs to determine PJ weights and measure of size for the CRSS PJ
sample selection. Without the special studies, NHTSA may fail to
accurately assess the national crash picture by missing pertinent crash
data.
Affected Public: Various Police Jurisdiction and State Agencies.
Local police jurisdictions (PJs) and State agencies that collect
and maintain central databases of motor vehicle crashes partner with
NHTSA to provide access to crash reports for the CRSS sample sites on a
routine basis. CRSS collects data from sampled police jurisdictions in
order to collect a nationally representative sample. However, because
CRSS only collects information from police crash reports for many
jurisdictions, NHTSA is able to collect the data directly from the
States. This is because States have been moving toward more electronic
and centralized data collection systems.
Estimated Number of Respondents: NHTSA estimates that approximately
28 States and 44 police jurisdictions will provide crash data to
support CRSS in each of the next three years. Because the portion of
NTS data that comes from the CRSS data collection relies on the CRSS
data collection methodologies, NHTSA estimates that the same 72
respondents will also provide data to NHTSA through the CRSS data
collection effort. The estimated number of respondents for the non-
sample count special study is approximately 136 PJs. The estimated
number of respondents for the PJ frame evaluation is approximately
1,248 PJs.
Frequency: Varies. The frequency of providing crash reports is
established by the local PJs and state agencies. Typically, weekly, or
bi-weekly access to crash reports is provided.
Estimated Number of Responses Annually: NHTSA estimates 677,005
crash reports, which includes both the CRSS and NTS crashes from the
sample PJs. However, of the 677,005 crashes, it is estimated that 3,000
of those will be NTS applicable crashes and thus remainder could be
CRSS applicable crashes is 674,005. Additionally, it is estimated that
the non-sample special studies will generate 247,110 crashes from the
non-sample PJs. The number of crashes for the PJ frame evaluation will
be estimated at the total of crash reports generated from combining the
sample and non-sample PJs to derive the six crash counts. Thus, the
number of generated crash reports estimated is 677,005 + 247,110 =
1,410,551 crashes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Study number of
crashes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRSS....................................................... 674,005
NTS........................................................ 3,000
Non-Sample Special Study................................... 247,100
PJ Frame Evaluation Special Study.......................... 1,410,551
------------
Grand Total............................................ 1,410,551
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 42,680 Hours.
Within the 30 States or 60 CRSS Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) there
are Police Jurisdictions (PJs), from which a CRSS sampler must obtain
crash reports for listing, categorization, and sampling. Currently, 50
PSUs provide NHTSA data electronically--through EDT, State website
access, or web service portal. For one State, the crash reports are
obtained through EDT and manually since not all crashes are reported
through EDT. Therefore, NHTSA counted that state more than once due to
the crash report acquisition method. However, there is a total of 10
PSUs, or 21 local PJs, where crash reports collection is conducted in
the field using a combination of electronic and manual methods as
dictated by the sample PJ's crash report collection methods. These PJs
required field samplers which incur an increased burden due to the
labor-intensive administrative practices and privacy protections
associated with manually accessing the crash reports. The total
respondents doesn't equal to 30 States or 60 PSUs, due to the variation
in accessing crash reports throughout the sample.
The annual burden estimate detailed in Table 1 is produced by
identifying the crash report access method for each PSU and PJ and
assigning the appropriate burden hours for that method as outlined
below.
EDT Maintenance--For PSUs providing crash report through
EDT, the burden is estimated at 5 hours annually. This accounts for
yearly updates to programming needed to successfully transmit data,
such as updating data structures if new data elements are added or any
changes to the state made to their crash report and/or databases.
State Website--User Access Only: For PSUs providing crash
reports via a state repository/website or database, the burden is
estimated at 10 hours annually. This represents time to process user
account requests, establish credentials, and routine maintenance of the
State's data repositories.
State Website--User Access and Additional Administrative
Functions: For PSUs providing crash reports directly to NHTSA via web
service or where the State employees provide user access accounts in
addition to regularly searches for crash reports, compiles the lists of
crashes to send to NHTSA monthly, the burden is estimated at 60 hours
annually. This represents implementation, data transfer monitoring, and
communications with NHTSA and its contractors.
For PSUs providing crash reports to NHTSA via manual crash
report access methods (i.e., weekly physical visits to a PJ, copying
crash reports and mailing them, and searching for recently completed
crash reports and uploading crash reports to secure email links), the
burden is estimated at 470 hours annually. This represents--but is not
limited to--maintaining a law enforcement presence while the crash
reports are being reviewed, and/or providing resources to the CRSS
sampler in order to access the crash reports. This is the most labor
extensive access type due to the administrative burden and the
additional processes required to protect PII. Other local police
jurisdictions may photocopy crash reports and FedEx to the contractors
or download electronic crash reports to submit electronically via
secure email or thumb drive monthly.
[[Page 58908]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Hours per respondents--police
Access method jurisdiction jurisdiction (PJ) Total hours
or states
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDT (Maintenance).......................................... 5 14 70
State Website (user access only)........................... 10 11 110
State Website (user access and additional administrative 60 2 120
functions)................................................
Web Service (user access and States query and compile info) 60 1 60
Mixed Manual............................................... 470 44 20,680
----------------------------------------------------
Grand Total............................................ .............. 72 21,040
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On an ad-hoc basis, NHTSA requests a non-sample count special study
to assess the Police Jurisdiction (PJ) frame. The non-sample count and
the PJ Frame evaluation studies are critical to assessing the quality
of the PJ frame of the CRSS PSUs to determine PJ weights and measure of
size for the CRSS PJ sample selection. Without the special studies,
NHTSA may fail to accurately assess the national crash picture by
missing pertinent crash data.
Number of Respondents: 136 (Non-Sample Count Special Study).
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 21,307 (Non-Sample Count
Special Study).
The burden calculation for the non-sample count special study is
difficult to determine. Each burden calculation is associated with the
agreed upon crash report access method for sample sites. For non-sample
PJs we have no established relationship nor is it known which type of
access to crash report is feasible. Most importantly, non-sample count
special studies are conducted on an ad-hoc basis and not implemented
every year. Table 2 illustrates non-sample counts by access method in
the state for sample sites.
EDT has been removed from the table because CRSS samples from the
entire county, there is no distinction between the non-sample and
sample PJs. This is an added benefit to EDT implementation as we get an
accurate assessment of the PSU frame by CRSS strata. State websites
with user access have non-sample PJs however, there is no added burden
because the initial access granted is at the state level. State website
with user access and additional administrative functions provide NHTSA
data at the county level, which includes both sample and non-sample
PJs, thus there is no additional burden to the state. Webservice
agreements also provide data at the county level, thus there is no
additional burden to the state. States noted as having manual methods
only account for the sample PJs. Without established cooperation, NHTSA
can't forecast individual PJs access methods for the purposes of the
burden calculation. Thus, the maximum burden for the non-sample count
special study's estimated burden is 21,307 with the possibility of
reduction with cooperative agreements finalized.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Hours per respondents--police
Access method jurisdiction jurisdiction (PJ) Total hours
or states
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Website (user access only)........................... 10 0 0
State Website (user access and additional administrative 60 0 0
functions)................................................
Web Service (user access and States query and compile info) 60 0 0
Manual..................................................... 470 136 * 21,307 (470
136/3)
----------------------------------------------------
Grand Total............................................ .............. 136 21,307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Respondents: 1,248 (PJ Frame Evaluation Special Study).
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 333 (PJ Frame Evaluation
Special Study).
The activities associated with PJ frame evaluation special study
include identifying the in-scope PJs and contacting the in-scope PJs
for the 6 crash counts. NHTSA estimates there are total 40 non-EDT PSUs
and about 1,248 PJs in those non-EDT PSUs. NHTSA estimates it would
about 1 minute per PJ to confirm if any changes to the PJ since the
2016. NHTSA anticipates approximately 15 minutes (0.25 hours) for each
PJ to prepare the 6 crash counts. NHTSA estimates the total number of
hours of response burden is about 333 hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
respondents
PJ frame evaluation Hours per jurisdiction jurisdiction Total hours
(PJ)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manual........................................ 16 Minutes...................... 1,248 * 333 (16/60
1,248)
-------------------------------
Grand Total............................... ................................ 1,248 333
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This hourly burden was calculated using the Bureau of Labor
Statistics' mean hourly wage estimate for Court, Municipal, and License
Clerks (Standard Occupational Classification
[[Page 58909]]
#43-4031) \3\ from May 2021 of $21.57. Therefore, NHTSA estimates the
hourly wage associated with the estimated 21,040 burden hours to be
$453,832.80 (21,040 hours x $21.57 per hour). This is a reduction of
the previously reported burden of 35,680 labor hours and estimated
costs of $705,036.80. The efficiencies with the increased
implementation of the EDT and better understanding of local and state
crash repositories contribute to the reduction in burden labor hours
and subsequent costs. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that for
State and local government workers, wages represent 54.96% of total
compensation.\4\ Therefore, the total cost of burden associated with
this collection is estimated to be $825,751.09 ($453,832.80/.5496).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See May 2021 National Industry-Specific Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates, 43-4031--Court, Municipal, and
License Clerks, available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes434031.htm (accessed May 18, 2022).
\4\ See Table 1. Employer Costs for Employee Compensation by
ownership (Dec. 2021), available at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t01.htm (accessed May 18, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The total burden hours are presented in the table below but
described for each study.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Study burden
hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRSS......................................................... 21,040
NTS.......................................................... 0
Non-Sample Special Study..................................... 21,307
PJ Frame Evaluation Special Study............................ 333
----------
Grand Total.............................................. 42,680
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost: $0.
NHTSA estimates that there are no costs associated with this
information collection other than labor costs associated with burden
hours. This is a drastic decrease from the $1.7 M from when NHTSA last
sought approval for this information collection. The decrease in costs
is a result of removing labor costs associated with labor hours that
were included in response to question 12, but unfortunately were
incorrect.
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the Department's
performance; (b) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for the
Department to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized
without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency
will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's
clearance of this information collection. You are asked to comment on
any aspects of this information collection, including (a) whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Department's estimate of the burden of the proposed information
collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29A.
Chou Lin Chen,
Associate Administrator, National Center for Statistics and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2022-21037 Filed 9-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P