Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Price List, 57541-57544 [2022-20267]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 20, 2022 / Notices
limited. In this regard, even the largest
U.S. equities exchange by volume only
has 17–18% market share, which in
most markets could hardly be
categorized as having enough market
power to burden competition.
Accordingly, the Exchange does not
believe that the proposed change will
impair the ability of members,
participants, or competing order
execution venues to maintain their
competitive standing in the financial
markets.
The proposed changes to clarify that
the Exchange does not charge a Disaster
Recovery Port Fee for ports listed in
Options 7, Section 6C(iii) and to clarify
that NTF ports are provided at no cost
are designed to expressly state existing
practices without changing their
operation and, therefore, the Exchange
believes that the proposed changes will
not impose a burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 10 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 11 thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
GEMX–2022–08 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
[Release No. 34–95773; File No. SR–NYSE–
2022–41]
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–GEMX–2022–08. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–GEMX–2022–08 and
should be submitted on or before
October 11, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–20275 Filed 9–19–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Price List
September 14, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on August
31, 2022, New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Price List to increase the NYSE Crossing
Session II monthly per member
organization fee cap. The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee changes
effective September 1, 2022. The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
10 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Sep 19, 2022
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
12 17
Jkt 256001
57541
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
57542
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 20, 2022 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Price List to increase the NYSE Crossing
Session II (‘‘CS II’’) monthly per member
organization fee cap.
The Exchange proposes to implement
the fee changes effective September 1,
2022.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Competitive Environment
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. Specifically, in Regulation
NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues
and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ‘‘has
been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 4
As the Commission itself has
recognized, the market for trading
services in NMS stocks has become
‘‘more fragmented and competitive.’’ 5
Indeed, equity trading is currently
dispersed across 16 exchanges,6 31
alternative trading systems,7 and
numerous broker-dealer internalizers
and wholesalers. Based on publiclyavailable information, no single
exchange has more than 20% of the
market.8 Therefore, no exchange
possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of equity order flow. More
specifically, the Exchange’s share of
executed volume of equity trades in
Tapes A, B and C securities is less than
12%.9
The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(S7–10–04) (Final Rule) (‘‘Regulation NMS’’).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808,
84FR 5202, 5253 (February 20, 2019) (File No. S7–
05–18) (Transaction Fee Pilot for NMS Stocks Final
Rule) (‘‘Transaction Fee Pilot’’).
6 See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, available at https://
markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/. See
generally https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/
divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
7 See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at
https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/
AtsIssueData. A list of alternative trading systems
registered with the Commission is available at
https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
8 See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, available at https://
markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
9 See id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Sep 19, 2022
Jkt 256001
exchanges from month to month
demonstrates that market participants
can move order flow, or discontinue or
reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes.
With respect to non-marketable order
flow that would provide displayed
liquidity on an Exchange, member
organizations can choose from any one
of the 16 currently operating registered
exchanges to route such order flow.
Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain exchange transaction fees that
relate to orders that would provide
liquidity on an exchange.
To respond to this competitive
environment, the Exchange has
established incentives for its member
organizations to utilize the Exchange’s
after-hours crossing session.10 The
proposed fee change is designed to
revise the incentives for CS II in order
to facilitate after-hours trading following
the decommissioning of the Exchange’s
affiliates’ after-hours facility, as
described below.
Proposed Rule Change
Currently, the Exchange charges a fee
of $0.0004 per share (both sides) for
executions in CS II.11 Fees for
executions in CS II are capped at
$200,000 per month per member
organization.
The Exchange proposes to increase
the monthly cap per member
organization to $300,000. The $0.0004
per share fee for executions in CS II
would remain unchanged and would be
subject to the proposed $300,000 per
month per member organization cap.
The Exchange proposed increasing
the cap to reflect the decommissioning
of the off-hours facility offered by the
Exchange’s affiliate NYSE American
LLC (‘‘NYSE American’’), effective
September 1, 2022.12 The Exchange
recently filed to adopt a new Rule 7.39
governing its off-hours trading facility
based on NYSE American Rule 7.39E
that would permit Exchange member
organizations to enter aggregate-price
coupled orders for securities, including
UTP securities, listed and traded on
NYSE.13 With the decommissioning of
10 CS II runs on the Exchange from 4 p.m. to 6:30
p.m. eastern time and handles member organization
crosses of baskets of securities of aggregate-priced
buy and sell orders. See NYSE Rule 7.39.
11 See note 10, supra.
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95499
(August 12, 2022), 87 FR 50894 (August 18, 2022)
(SR–NYSEAMER–2022–35) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
to Delete Current Rule 7.39E).
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95498
(August 12, 2022), 87 FR 50906 (August 18, 2022)
(SR–NYSE–2022–37) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
to Adopt a New Rule 7.39 and Delete Current Rules
900–907).
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the NYSE American facility, the
Exchange anticipates that the NYSE
American ETP Holders that utilize the
NYSE American off-hours facility, all of
whom are also NYSE member
organizations, would be in a position to
transition to CS II. The NYSE American
off-hours facility was subject to a
$100,000 cap per month, equivalent to
the proposed increase. No member
organization qualifies for the Exchange’s
current fee cap. The Exchange further
notes that it does not know how much
order flow member organizations choose
to route to off-exchange venues in the
after-hours market.14
The proposed changes are not
otherwise intended to address other
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of
any significant problems that market
participants would have in complying
with the proposed changes.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,15 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,16 in particular,
because it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members,
issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Proposed Change Is Reasonable
As discussed above, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market.
The Commission has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets. In
Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues and, also, recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 17
While Regulation NMS has enhanced
competition, it has also fostered a
‘‘fragmented’’ market structure where
trading in a single stock can occur
across multiple trading centers. When
multiple trading centers compete for
order flow in the same stock, the
14 The Exchange also proposes the nonsubstantive correction of inserting a missing
parenthesis following ‘‘member organization.’’
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) & (5).
17 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37495, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(S7–10–04) (Final Rule) (‘‘Regulation NMS’’).
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 20, 2022 / Notices
Commission has recognized that ‘‘such
competition can lead to the
fragmentation of order flow in that
stock.’’ 18
The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month
demonstrates that market participants
can move order flow, or discontinue or
reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes,
including with respect to after-hours
crossing sessions. Accordingly,
competitive forces constrain exchange
transaction fees that relate to after-hours
crossing orders. Stated otherwise,
changes to exchange transaction fees
can have a direct effect on the ability of
an exchange to compete for order flow.
Given this competitive environment,
the proposal represents a reasonable
attempt to maintain a cap for member
organizations that are particularly active
during CS II in view of the
decommissioning of the after-hours
session on the Exchange’s affiliate NYSE
American. The Exchange anticipates
that member organization volume that
would have participated on NYSE
American’s after-hours session could
migrate to CS II, and the proposal
represents a reasonable attempt to
encompass an increase in volume by
particularly active member
organizations. As noted above, the fee
subject to the cap would remain
unchanged. The Exchange notes that the
last time this cap was changed was
2015.19
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Proposal Is an Equitable Allocation
of Fees
The Exchange believes the proposal
equitably allocates its fees among its
market participants. The Exchange is
not proposing to adjust the fee for
executions in CS II, which will remain
at the current level for all market
participants. Rather, by capping
executions for all member organizations
in CS II at an adjusted level that reflects
the decommissioning of the NYSE
American after-hours session and the
anticipated migration of volume from
NYSE American to the NYSE, the
proposal would encourage member
organizations to send additional orders
to the Exchange’s after-hours trading
session. The Exchange notes that the
proposed cap of $300,000 reflects the
18 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75793
(August 32, 2015), 80 FR 53600 (September 04,
2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–37) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
to Amend its Price List to Raise the NYSE Crossing
Session II Fee Cap).
19 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358,
75 FR 3594, 3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7–
02–10) (Concept Release on Equity Market
Structure).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Sep 19, 2022
Jkt 256001
combination of the current NYSE cap of
$200,000 and the current NYSE
American cap of $100,000. As noted, the
same member organizations that
participate in CS II participated in the
NYSE American after-hours session, and
the Exchange anticipates that these
member organizations will send
additional volume to CS II, which can
accept aggregate-price coupled orders
for securities, including UTP securities,
listed and traded on NYSE, following
the decommissioning of the NYSE
American after-hours facility.20 As
proposed, all similarly situated member
organizations will be subject to the same
fee structure to participate in CS II and
access to the Exchange’s market will
continue to be offered on fair and nondiscriminatory terms.
The Proposal Is Not Unfairly
Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is not unfairly discriminatory.
In the prevailing competitive
environment, member organizations are
free to disfavor the Exchange’s pricing if
they believe that alternatives offer them
better value.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed increase in the monthly fee
cap for CS II transactions is not unfairly
discriminatory because the proposal
would be provided on an equal basis to
all member organizations that choose to
utilize the after-hours facility, who
would all be eligible for the proposed
cap on an equal basis. The proposal
neither targets nor will it have a
disparate impact on any particular
category of market participant. The
proposal does not permit unfair
discrimination because the higher cap
would be applied to all similarly
situated member organizations, who
would all be eligible for the same cap on
an equal basis. Accordingly, no member
organization already operating on the
Exchange would be disadvantaged by
this allocation of fees. Further, as noted,
the Exchange believes the proposal
would provide an incentive for member
organizations to send additional orders
to CS II following the decommissioning
of the NYSE American after-hours
facility, which would benefit member
organizations that would only need to
send after-hours orders to a single
facility for all tapes.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the
Exchange’s statement regarding the
burden on competition.
For the foregoing reasons, the
Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,21 the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would not impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as
discussed above, the increase in the fee
cap for member organizations that are
particularly active in CS II would not
burden competition because it would
apply to all member organizations on
equal, fair and non-discriminatory
terms. In addition, as noted, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
changes would encourage the
submission of additional liquidity to the
Exchange’s after-hours facility following
the decommissioning of NYSE
American’s after-hours facility. The
Exchange anticipates that member
organizations will send additional
volume to CS II, which can accept
aggregate-price coupled orders for
securities, including UTP securities,
listed and traded on NYSE. As a result,
the Exchange believes that the proposed
change furthers the Commission’s goal
in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
integrated competition among orders,
which promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing
of individual stocks for all types of
orders, large and small.’’ 22
Intramarket Competition. The
proposed change is designed to attract
additional order flow to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change would continue to
incentivize market participants to direct
after-hours order flow to the Exchange.
Greater two-sided liquidity in the afterhours trading session benefits all market
participants. The current credit and the
proposed cap would continue to be
available to all similarly-situated market
participants, and, as such, the proposed
change would not impose a disparate
burden on competition among market
participants on the Exchange. As noted,
the proposal would apply to all
similarly situated member organizations
on the same and equal terms, who
would benefit from the change on the
same basis. Accordingly, the proposed
change would not impose a disparate
burden on competition among market
participants on the Exchange.
Intermarket Competition. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily choose to send
21 15
20 See
PO 00000
Rule 7.39.
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
NMS, 70 FR at 37498–99.
22 Regulation
Sfmt 4703
57543
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
57544
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 20, 2022 / Notices
their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels
at those other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees and rebates to remain competitive
with other exchanges and with offexchange venues. Because competitors
are free to modify their own fees and
credits in response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange
does not believe its proposed fee change
can impose any burden on intermarket
competition.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change could promote
competition between the Exchange and
other execution venues, including those
that currently offer after-hours trading
sessions and comparable transaction
pricing, by encouraging additional
orders to be sent to the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 23 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 24
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 25 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2022–41 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2022–41. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2022–41, and should be submitted on or
before October 11, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.26
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–20267 Filed 9–19–22; 8:45 am]
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
25 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
24 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Sep 19, 2022
26 17
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
[Release No. 34–95775; File No. SR–
PEARL–2022–35]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX
PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the MIAX
PEARL Options Fee Schedule To
Remove Certain Credits
September 14, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 1, 2022, MIAX PEARL, LLC
(‘‘MIAX Pearl’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX Pearl Options Fee
Schedule (the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to
remove two monthly credits associated
with Trading Permit 3 and nontransaction fees.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings/pearl at MIAX Pearl’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The term ‘‘Trading Permit’’ means a permit
issued by the Exchange that confers the ability to
transact on the Exchange. See Exchange Rule 100.
2 17
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
23 15
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57541-57544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-20267]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-95773; File No. SR-NYSE-2022-41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Price List
September 14, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on August 31, 2022, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to increase the NYSE
Crossing Session II monthly per member organization fee cap. The
Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes effective September 1,
2022. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website
at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
[[Page 57542]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to increase the NYSE
Crossing Session II (``CS II'') monthly per member organization fee
cap.
The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes effective
September 1, 2022.
Competitive Environment
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining
prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation
of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting
market competition in its broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (Final Rule)
(``Regulation NMS'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the Commission itself has recognized, the market for trading
services in NMS stocks has become ``more fragmented and competitive.''
\5\ Indeed, equity trading is currently dispersed across 16
exchanges,\6\ 31 alternative trading systems,\7\ and numerous broker-
dealer internalizers and wholesalers. Based on publicly-available
information, no single exchange has more than 20% of the market.\8\
Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the
execution of equity order flow. More specifically, the Exchange's share
of executed volume of equity trades in Tapes A, B and C securities is
less than 12%.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 84FR 5202,
5253 (February 20, 2019) (File No. S7-05-18) (Transaction Fee Pilot
for NMS Stocks Final Rule) (``Transaction Fee Pilot'').
\6\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/. See generally https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
\7\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of
alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
\8\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary,
available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
\9\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can
move order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes. With respect to non-marketable
order flow that would provide displayed liquidity on an Exchange,
member organizations can choose from any one of the 16 currently
operating registered exchanges to route such order flow. Accordingly,
competitive forces constrain exchange transaction fees that relate to
orders that would provide liquidity on an exchange.
To respond to this competitive environment, the Exchange has
established incentives for its member organizations to utilize the
Exchange's after-hours crossing session.\10\ The proposed fee change is
designed to revise the incentives for CS II in order to facilitate
after-hours trading following the decommissioning of the Exchange's
affiliates' after-hours facility, as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ CS II runs on the Exchange from 4 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. eastern
time and handles member organization crosses of baskets of
securities of aggregate-priced buy and sell orders. See NYSE Rule
7.39.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Change
Currently, the Exchange charges a fee of $0.0004 per share (both
sides) for executions in CS II.\11\ Fees for executions in CS II are
capped at $200,000 per month per member organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See note 10, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to increase the monthly cap per member
organization to $300,000. The $0.0004 per share fee for executions in
CS II would remain unchanged and would be subject to the proposed
$300,000 per month per member organization cap.
The Exchange proposed increasing the cap to reflect the
decommissioning of the off-hours facility offered by the Exchange's
affiliate NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American''), effective September 1,
2022.\12\ The Exchange recently filed to adopt a new Rule 7.39
governing its off-hours trading facility based on NYSE American Rule
7.39E that would permit Exchange member organizations to enter
aggregate-price coupled orders for securities, including UTP
securities, listed and traded on NYSE.\13\ With the decommissioning of
the NYSE American facility, the Exchange anticipates that the NYSE
American ETP Holders that utilize the NYSE American off-hours facility,
all of whom are also NYSE member organizations, would be in a position
to transition to CS II. The NYSE American off-hours facility was
subject to a $100,000 cap per month, equivalent to the proposed
increase. No member organization qualifies for the Exchange's current
fee cap. The Exchange further notes that it does not know how much
order flow member organizations choose to route to off-exchange venues
in the after-hours market.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95499 (August 12,
2022), 87 FR 50894 (August 18, 2022) (SR-NYSEAMER-2022-35) (Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to
Delete Current Rule 7.39E).
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95498 (August 12,
2022), 87 FR 50906 (August 18, 2022) (SR-NYSE-2022-37) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Adopt
a New Rule 7.39 and Delete Current Rules 900-907).
\14\ The Exchange also proposes the non-substantive correction
of inserting a missing parenthesis following ``member
organization.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed changes are not otherwise intended to address other
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any significant problems that
market participants would have in complying with the proposed changes.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\15\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\16\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) & (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Change Is Reasonable
As discussed above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS,
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \17\ While Regulation
NMS has enhanced competition, it has also fostered a ``fragmented''
market structure where trading in a single stock can occur across
multiple trading centers. When multiple trading centers compete for
order flow in the same stock, the
[[Page 57543]]
Commission has recognized that ``such competition can lead to the
fragmentation of order flow in that stock.'' \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37495, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (Final Rule)
(``Regulation NMS'').
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75793 (August 32,
2015), 80 FR 53600 (September 04, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-37) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend
its Price List to Raise the NYSE Crossing Session II Fee Cap).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can
move order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes, including with respect to after-
hours crossing sessions. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain
exchange transaction fees that relate to after-hours crossing orders.
Stated otherwise, changes to exchange transaction fees can have a
direct effect on the ability of an exchange to compete for order flow.
Given this competitive environment, the proposal represents a
reasonable attempt to maintain a cap for member organizations that are
particularly active during CS II in view of the decommissioning of the
after-hours session on the Exchange's affiliate NYSE American. The
Exchange anticipates that member organization volume that would have
participated on NYSE American's after-hours session could migrate to CS
II, and the proposal represents a reasonable attempt to encompass an
increase in volume by particularly active member organizations. As
noted above, the fee subject to the cap would remain unchanged. The
Exchange notes that the last time this cap was changed was 2015.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358, 75 FR 3594,
3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7-02-10) (Concept Release on
Equity Market Structure).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposal Is an Equitable Allocation of Fees
The Exchange believes the proposal equitably allocates its fees
among its market participants. The Exchange is not proposing to adjust
the fee for executions in CS II, which will remain at the current level
for all market participants. Rather, by capping executions for all
member organizations in CS II at an adjusted level that reflects the
decommissioning of the NYSE American after-hours session and the
anticipated migration of volume from NYSE American to the NYSE, the
proposal would encourage member organizations to send additional orders
to the Exchange's after-hours trading session. The Exchange notes that
the proposed cap of $300,000 reflects the combination of the current
NYSE cap of $200,000 and the current NYSE American cap of $100,000. As
noted, the same member organizations that participate in CS II
participated in the NYSE American after-hours session, and the Exchange
anticipates that these member organizations will send additional volume
to CS II, which can accept aggregate-price coupled orders for
securities, including UTP securities, listed and traded on NYSE,
following the decommissioning of the NYSE American after-hours
facility.\20\ As proposed, all similarly situated member organizations
will be subject to the same fee structure to participate in CS II and
access to the Exchange's market will continue to be offered on fair and
non-discriminatory terms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Rule 7.39.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposal Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory. In the prevailing competitive environment, member
organizations are free to disfavor the Exchange's pricing if they
believe that alternatives offer them better value.
The Exchange believes that the proposed increase in the monthly fee
cap for CS II transactions is not unfairly discriminatory because the
proposal would be provided on an equal basis to all member
organizations that choose to utilize the after-hours facility, who
would all be eligible for the proposed cap on an equal basis. The
proposal neither targets nor will it have a disparate impact on any
particular category of market participant. The proposal does not permit
unfair discrimination because the higher cap would be applied to all
similarly situated member organizations, who would all be eligible for
the same cap on an equal basis. Accordingly, no member organization
already operating on the Exchange would be disadvantaged by this
allocation of fees. Further, as noted, the Exchange believes the
proposal would provide an incentive for member organizations to send
additional orders to CS II following the decommissioning of the NYSE
American after-hours facility, which would benefit member organizations
that would only need to send after-hours orders to a single facility
for all tapes.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\21\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the increase in the
fee cap for member organizations that are particularly active in CS II
would not burden competition because it would apply to all member
organizations on equal, fair and non-discriminatory terms. In addition,
as noted, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes would
encourage the submission of additional liquidity to the Exchange's
after-hours facility following the decommissioning of NYSE American's
after-hours facility. The Exchange anticipates that member
organizations will send additional volume to CS II, which can accept
aggregate-price coupled orders for securities, including UTP
securities, listed and traded on NYSE. As a result, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change furthers the Commission's goal in
adopting Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among
orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual stocks
for all types of orders, large and small.'' \22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\22\ Regulation NMS, 70 FR at 37498-99.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to attract
additional order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the
proposed change would continue to incentivize market participants to
direct after-hours order flow to the Exchange. Greater two-sided
liquidity in the after-hours trading session benefits all market
participants. The current credit and the proposed cap would continue to
be available to all similarly-situated market participants, and, as
such, the proposed change would not impose a disparate burden on
competition among market participants on the Exchange. As noted, the
proposal would apply to all similarly situated member organizations on
the same and equal terms, who would benefit from the change on the same
basis. Accordingly, the proposed change would not impose a disparate
burden on competition among market participants on the Exchange.
Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily choose to
send
[[Page 57544]]
their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues if they deem fee
levels at those other venues to be more favorable. In such an
environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees and rebates
to remain competitive with other exchanges and with off-exchange
venues. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees and
credits in response, and because market participants may readily adjust
their order routing practices, the Exchange does not believe its
proposed fee change can impose any burden on intermarket competition.
The Exchange believes that the proposed change could promote
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues, including
those that currently offer after-hours trading sessions and comparable
transaction pricing, by encouraging additional orders to be sent to the
Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \23\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \24\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\24\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \25\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2022-41 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2022-41. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2022-41, and should be submitted on
or before October 11, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-20267 Filed 9-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P