Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2020-2021, 55993-55995 [2022-19768]

Download as PDF 55993 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2022 / Notices TABLE 1—ANNUAL ACS AND PRCS RESPONDENT AND BURDEN HOUR ESTIMATES Estimated minutes per respondent by data collection activity Annual estimated burden hours Data collection operation Forms or instrument used in data collection I. ACS Household Questionnaire, Online Survey, Telephone, and Personal Visit. II. ACS GQ Facility Questionnaire CAPI— Telephone and Personal Visit. III. ACS GQ CAPI Personal Interview or Telephone, and Paper Self-response. IV. ACS Household Reinterview—CATI/CAPI V. ACS GQ-level Reinterview—CATI/CAPI .... ACS–1, ACS 1(SP), ACS–1PR, ACS– 1PR(SP), Online Survey, Telephone, CAPI. CAPI GQFQ ................................................... 3,576,000 40 2,384,000 20,100 15 5,025 CAPI, ACS–1(GQ), ACS–1(GQ)(PR) ............ 170,900 25 71,208 ACS HU–RI .................................................... ACS GQ–RI .................................................... 22,875 1,422 10 10 3,813 237 Totals ....................................................... ......................................................................... 3,791,297 N/A 2,464,283 Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0. (This is not the cost of respondents’ time, but the indirect costs respondents may incur for such things as purchases of specialized software or hardware needed to report, or expenditures for accounting or records maintenance services required specifically by the collection.) Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. 141 and 193. jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES Annual estimated number of respondents cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Sheleen Dumas, Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Commerce Department. [FR Doc. 2022–19705 Filed 9–12–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board IV. Request for Comments [S–161–2022] We are soliciting public comments to permit the Department/Bureau to: (a) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is necessary for the proper functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the time and cost burden for this proposed collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. We will include, or summarize, each comment in our request to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we Foreign-Trade Zone 98—Birmingham, Alabama; Application for Subzone BLG Logistics of Alabama LLC, Northport, Alabama VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 12, 2022 Jkt 256001 An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by the City of Birmingham, grantee of FTZ 98, requesting subzone status for the facility of BLG Logistics of Alabama LLC, located in Northport, Alabama. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a– 81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on September 07, 2022. The proposed subzone (15.5 acres) is located at 6801 Fifth Street, Northport, Alabama. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time. The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 98. In accordance with the FTZ Board’s regulations, Christopher Kemp of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 October 24, 2022. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to November 7, 2022. A copy of the application will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Online FTZ Information Section’’ section of the FTZ Board’s website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ ftz. For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at Christopher.Kemp@trade.gov. Dated: September 7, 2022. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2022–19702 Filed 9–12–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2020–2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that large power transformers from the Republic of Korea were not sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), August 1, 2020, through July 31, 2021. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable September 13, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1 55994 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2022 / Notices Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce published the antidumping duty order on large power transformers on August 31, 2012.1 Commerce provided an opportunity to request an administrative review on August 2, 2021.2 Between August 17 and 31, 2021, we received requests to conduct an administrative review from Hyosung,3 Hyundai,4 ABB Inc. and SPX Transformer Solutions Inc (the petitioners),5 and Iljin Electric Co., Ltd.6 Commerce initiated this review on October 7, 2021.7 We selected one mandatory respondent in this review, Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation (Hyosung). For a more detailed description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.8 On January 18, 2022, the petitioners requested the Commerce conduct onsite (or other) verifications of Hyosung. As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to verify the information relied upon in determining the final results of review. Scope of the Order jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES The scope of this Order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers having a top power handling capacity 1 See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012) (Order). 2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 86 FR 41436 (August 2, 2021). 3 See Hyosung’s Letter, ‘‘Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Hyosung’s Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated August 17, 2021. 4 See Hyundai’s Letter, ‘‘Large Power Transformers from South Korea: Administrative Review Request,’’ dated August 17, 2021. 5 See the petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Large Power Transformers from Republic of Korea—Petitioners’ Request for 2020/2021 Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2021. On January 20, 2022, counsel for the petitioners filed an amended entry of appearance, stating that ABB Enterprise Software Inc. changed its name to Hitachi Energy USA, Inc. On February 11, 2022, counsel for the petitioners filed an amended entry of appearance, stating that SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. changed its name to Prolec-GE Waukesha, Inc. 6 See Iljin Electric Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Antidumping Order on Large Power Transformers from Korea—Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2021. 7 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 55811 (October 7, 2021). 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2020–2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 12, 2022 Jkt 256001 greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the Order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the Order is dispositive.9 2.38 percent from Hyosung to the nonselected companies. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as the appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation ................................... Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd .......................... Iljin Electric Co., Ltd ................... ILJIN ........................................... LSIS Co., Ltd.10 .......................... Rate for Non-Selected Respondents The statute and Commerce’s regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.’’ Hyosung is the only mandatory respondent. Accordingly, we have applied a rate of 9 The full text of the scope of the Order is contained in Preliminary Decision Memorandum. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2020, through July 31, 2021, the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist: Producer/exporter Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 Disclosure and Public Comment We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this administrative review within five days after public announcement of the preliminary results, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs according to the timeline Commerce establishes after the issuance of the final verification report. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than seven days after the date for filing case briefs.11 Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.12 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this administrative review are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.13 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a 10 Commerce determined that LS Electric Co., Ltd. is the successor-in-interest to LSIS Co., Ltd. See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Final Successor-in-Interest Determination; 2018–2019, 86 FR 30915 (June 10, 2021). 11 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020) (‘‘To provide adequate time for release of case briefs via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date for all rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs are filed (while these modifications remain in effect).’’) 12 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 13 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2022 / Notices hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) the party’s name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time and date to be determined. An electronically filed hearing request must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.14 Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If the weightedaverage dumping margin for Hyosung is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).15 We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). If Hyosung’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, or if an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.16 In accordance with Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice,17 for 14 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). 16 Id., 77 FR at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 17 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES 15 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 12, 2022 Jkt 256001 entries of subject merchandise during the review period produced by each respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate of 22.00 percent established in the investigation.18 For the companies which were not selected for individual review (i.e., Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd., Iljin Electric Co., Ltd., ILJIN, and LSIS Co., Ltd.), we will assign an assessment rate based on the cash deposit rate calculated for the company selected for mandatory review (i.e., Hyosung).19 The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.20 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). The final results of this administrative review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise under review and for future cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties, where applicable. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for Hyosung and other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently 18 See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 77 FR 40857 (July 11, 2012). 19 See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act; see also Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Section VII, ‘‘Rate for Non-Selected Companies. 20 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 55995 completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, the rate established in the investigation of this proceeding.21 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: August 31, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of the Methodology VI. Rate for Non-Selected Companies VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–19768 Filed 9–12–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 21 See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55993-55995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-867]


Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2020-2021

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds 
that large power transformers from the Republic of Korea were not sold 
in the United States at less than normal value during the period of 
review (POR), August 1, 2020, through July 31, 2021. Interested parties 
are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable September 13, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401

[[Page 55994]]

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Commerce published the antidumping duty order on large power 
transformers on August 31, 2012.\1\ Commerce provided an opportunity to 
request an administrative review on August 2, 2021.\2\ Between August 
17 and 31, 2021, we received requests to conduct an administrative 
review from Hyosung,\3\ Hyundai,\4\ ABB Inc. and SPX Transformer 
Solutions Inc (the petitioners),\5\ and Iljin Electric Co., Ltd.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012) (Order).
    \2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative 
Review, 86 FR 41436 (August 2, 2021).
    \3\ See Hyosung's Letter, ``Large Power Transformers from the 
Republic of Korea: Hyosung's Request for Administrative Review,'' 
dated August 17, 2021.
    \4\ See Hyundai's Letter, ``Large Power Transformers from South 
Korea: Administrative Review Request,'' dated August 17, 2021.
    \5\ See the petitioners' Letter, ``Large Power Transformers from 
Republic of Korea--Petitioners' Request for 2020/2021 Administrative 
Review,'' dated August 31, 2021. On January 20, 2022, counsel for 
the petitioners filed an amended entry of appearance, stating that 
ABB Enterprise Software Inc. changed its name to Hitachi Energy USA, 
Inc. On February 11, 2022, counsel for the petitioners filed an 
amended entry of appearance, stating that SPX Transformer Solutions, 
Inc. changed its name to Prolec-GE Waukesha, Inc.
    \6\ See Iljin Electric Co., Ltd.'s Letter, ``Antidumping Order 
on Large Power Transformers from Korea--Request for Administrative 
Review,'' dated August 31, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce initiated this review on October 7, 2021.\7\ We selected 
one mandatory respondent in this review, Hyosung Heavy Industries 
Corporation (Hyosung). For a more detailed description of the events 
that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 55811 (October 7, 2021).
    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Power 
Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2020-2021,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 18, 2022, the petitioners requested the Commerce conduct 
on-site (or other) verifications of Hyosung. As provided in section 
782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to verify the information relied 
upon in determining the final results of review.

Scope of the Order

    The scope of this Order covers large liquid dielectric power 
transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal 
to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or 
unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the 
Order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 
8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience 
and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of 
the Order is dispositive.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The full text of the scope of the Order is contained in 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full 
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as the appendix to this 
notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is 
made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Rate for Non-Selected Respondents

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for 
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an 
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. 
Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market 
economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for 
companies which were not selected for individual examination in an 
administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-
others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of 
the estimated weighted average dumping margins established for 
exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero 
or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the 
basis of facts available{time} .'' Hyosung is the only mandatory 
respondent. Accordingly, we have applied a rate of 2.38 percent from 
Hyosung to the non-selected companies.

Preliminary Results of Review

    We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2020, 
through July 31, 2021, the following weighted-average dumping margins 
exist:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation........................        2.38
Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd..................        2.38
Iljin Electric Co., Ltd.....................................        2.38
ILJIN.......................................................        2.38
LSIS Co., Ltd.\10\..........................................        2.38
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
administrative review within five days after public announcement of the 
preliminary results, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Commerce determined that LS Electric Co., Ltd. is the 
successor-in-interest to LSIS Co., Ltd. See Large Power Transformers 
from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and 
Final Successor-in-Interest Determination; 2018-2019, 86 FR 30915 
(June 10, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit 
case briefs according to the timeline Commerce establishes after the 
issuance of the final verification report. Rebuttal briefs, limited to 
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than seven 
days after the date for filing case briefs.\11\ Note that Commerce has 
temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents 
containing business proprietary information, until further notice.\12\ 
Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 
administrative review are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) 
a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) 
a table of authorities.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule Modifying 
AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 
(March 26, 2020) (``To provide adequate time for release of case 
briefs via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date for all 
rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs are filed (while 
these modifications remain in effect).'')
    \12\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements 
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 
10, 2020).
    \13\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a

[[Page 55995]]

hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. Requests 
should contain: (1) the party's name, address and telephone number; (2) 
the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the 
respective case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce 
intends to hold the hearing at a time and date to be determined. An 
electronically filed hearing request must be received successfully in 
its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 
p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative 
review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in 
any written briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of 
publication of this notice, unless extended, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuing the final results, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries. If the weighted-average dumping margin for 
Hyosung is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the 
final results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific 
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of 
dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales and the total 
entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1).\15\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-
specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review 
is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). If Hyosung's weighted-average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, or 
if an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce 
will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 
2012).
    \16\ Id., 77 FR at 8102-03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' 
practice,\17\ for entries of subject merchandise during the review 
period produced by each respondent for which it did not know its 
merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate of 22.00 percent 
established in the investigation.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
    \18\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: 
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 77 FR 40857 
(July 11, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies which were not selected for individual review 
(i.e., Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd., Iljin Electric Co., 
Ltd., ILJIN, and LSIS Co., Ltd.), we will assign an assessment rate 
based on the cash deposit rate calculated for the company selected for 
mandatory review (i.e., Hyosung).\19\ The final results of this review 
shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries 
of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for 
future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act; see also Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum at Section VII, ``Rate for Non-Selected 
Companies.
    \20\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication). The final results of this administrative 
review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on 
entries of merchandise under review and for future cash deposits of 
estimated antidumping duties, where applicable.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for Hyosung and 
other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-average 
dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative 
review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not 
listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a 
firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation 
but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the 
producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 
22.00 percent, the rate established in the investigation of this 
proceeding.\21\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    Commerce is issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), and 
19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: August 31, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Rate for Non-Selected Companies
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2022-19768 Filed 9-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P