Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule, 56103-56107 [2022-19683]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2022 / Notices jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES securities exchange.40 In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,41 which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and that the rules of a national securities exchange are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. As described above, the DMM is responsible for determining the Auction Price for the Closing Auctions in its assigned securities, and if there is an Imbalance of any size, the DMM must select an Auction Price that is able to satisfy all better-priced orders on the Side of the Imbalance. The Exchange proposes to add that the Closing Auction Price determined by the DMM must also be at a price that is at or between the last-published Imbalance Reference Price and the last-published Continuous Book Clearing Price. The Exchange has included statistics in its proposal showing that the proposed Closing Auction Price parameters are, for the vast majority of Closing Auctions, consistent with how the Closing Auction Price has been determined under the current rules.42 The Exchange has also included statistics in its proposal showing that, as to more recent Closing Auction data, auctions executing within the proposed range resulted in more representative prices for market participants.43 The Exchange also proposes that DMM Orders would not participate in the Closing Auction or factor into the calculation of the Continuous Book Clearing Price and that, after the end of Core Trading Hours, a DMM would be able to enter DMM Auction Liquidity only in order to supply liquidity as needed to meet the DMM’s obligation to facilitate the Closing Auction in a fair and orderly manner within the proposed pricing parameters. 40 In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 41 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 42 See Section II supra. 43 The Exchange also included statistics in its proposal showing that during the last quarter of 2021 and year to date, 95.0% of Closing Auctions occurred within the proposed pricing parameters, and that these numbers did not materially change for volatile trading days. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 12, 2022 Jkt 256001 The Commission finds that the proposed pricing parameters for determining the Closing Auction Price, as well as the proposed limitation on the entry of DMM interest (specifically, DMM Auction Liquidity) after the close of regular trading, are reasonably designed to (1) limit the price range within which a DMM can facilitate the Closing Auction in its assigned securities to a price range that reflects the natural forces of supply and demand for a security in the Closing Auction; and (2) enhance transparency and certainty for market participants with respect to the Closing Auction. The proposed price parameters and limitation on DMM Auction Liquidity are therefore reasonably designed to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. Moreover, by providing that DMM Orders will neither participate in the Closing Auction nor figure into the calculation of the Continuous Book Clearing Price— one of the proposed pricing parameters for the Closing Auction—the Exchange’s proposal would limit the extent to which a DMM could influence the price parameters for the Closing Auction Price, which is reasonably designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices. The Commission further finds that the other conforming and non-substantive changes proposed by the Exchange are consistent with the substantive changes discussed above and do not raise any regulatory issues. IV. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,44 that the proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2022– 32) be, and it hereby is, approved. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.45 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2022–19682 Filed 9–12–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–95694; File No. SR– NYSEAMER–2022–39] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule September 7, 2022. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on August 31, 2022, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) regarding credits for certain Qualified Contingent Cross (‘‘QCC’’) transactions and to make an administrative change. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective September 1, 2022. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. 1 15 44 Id. 45 17 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 2 15 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Frm 00116 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 56103 E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1 56104 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2022 / Notices A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of this filing to amend the Fee Schedule to (1) modify Floor Broker credits for QCC transactions,4 and (2) make an administrative change to the table setting forth fees for Premium Products to reflect a ticker symbol change. The Exchange proposes to implement the rule change on September 1, 2022. Floor Broker QCC Credits The Exchange proposes to modify the credits available to Floor Brokers on QCC orders. Currently, Floor Brokers earn a credit for executed QCC orders of ($0.07) per contract for the first 300,000 contracts or ($0.10) per contract in excess of 300,000.5 The Exchange currently limits the maximum Floor Broker credit to $525,000 per month per Floor Broker firm.6 QCC executions in which a Customer or Professional Customer, or both, is on both sides of the QCC trade are not eligible for the Floor Broker credit, and the Floor Broker credit is paid only on volume within the applicable tier and is not retroactive to the first contract traded.7 The Exchange now proposes to increase the amount of the credits available to Floor Brokers for executed QCC orders. Specifically, the Exchange proposes that Floor Brokers may earn a credit of ($0.08) per contract for the first 300,000 contracts and a credit of ($0.11) per contract on all contracts above 300,000 in a month. Although the Exchange cannot predict with certainty whether the proposed change would encourage Floor Brokers to increase their QCC volume, the proposed change is intended to continue to incent additional QCC executions by Floor Brokers by increasing the credits available on such orders, and all Floor Brokers are eligible to qualify for the proposed credits. jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES Ticker Symbol Change The Exchange proposes to make an administrative change to Section III.D. 4 A QCC is comprised of an originating order to buy or sell at least 1,000 contracts, or 10,000 minioptions contracts, that is identified as being part of a qualified contingent trade (as such term is defined in Commentary .01 to Rule 900.3NY), coupled with a contra side order or orders totaling an equal number of contracts. See Rule 900.3NY(y). 5 See Fee Schedule, Section I.F., QCC Fees & Credits, available here, https://www.nyse.com/ publicdocs/nyse/markets/american-options/NYSE_ American_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf. See id., Section I.F., Footnote 1. 6 See id., Section I.F. Footnote 1. 7 See id. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 12, 2022 Jkt 256001 of the Fee Schedule to reflect a ticker symbol change. Section III.D., NYSE American Options Market Maker Monthly Premium Product Fee, sets forth the monthly fee assessed to NYSE American Options Market Makers that transact in certain Premium Products set forth in a table (the ‘‘Premium Products Table’’) in this section of the Fee Schedule. One such product, Meta Platforms, Inc., changed its trading symbol from FB to META effective June 9, 2022. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to update the Premium Products Table to replace ‘‘FB’’ with ‘‘META.’’ The Exchange believes this proposed change would improve the clarity and accuracy of the Fee Schedule by ensuring that the Premium Products Table reflects the current ticker symbol for all Premium Products. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,8 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,9 in particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Proposed Rule Change is Reasonable The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ‘‘has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.’’ 10 There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.11 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). 10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7–10–04) (‘‘Reg NMS Adopting Release’’). 11 The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, available here: https:// 9 15 PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. More specifically, in July 2022, the Exchange had less than 8% market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.12 The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated otherwise, changes to exchange transaction fees can have a direct effect on the ability of an exchange to compete for order flow. To respond to this competitive marketplace, the Exchange has established incentives to assist Floor Brokers in attracting more business to the Exchange—including credits on QCC transactions—as such participants serve an important function in facilitating the execution of orders on the Exchange (including via open outcry), thereby promoting price discovery on the public markets. The Exchange believes that the proposed modification of the credits offered to Floor Brokers on QCC transactions is reasonable because it is designed to continue to incent Floor Brokers to increase the number of QCC transactions sent to the Exchange. To the extent that the proposed change attracts more volume to the Exchange, this increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for order execution, which, in turn, promotes just and equitable principles of trade and removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. The Exchange notes that all market participants stand to benefit from any increase in volume by Floor Brokers, which could promote market depth, facilitate tighter spreads and enhance price discovery to the extent the proposed change encourages Floor Brokers to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue, and may lead to a corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants. In www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-DataReports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/MonthlyWeekly-Volume-Statistics. 12 Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see id., the Exchange’s market share in equity-based options was 7.53% for the month of July 2021 and 7.26% for the month of July 2022. E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2022 / Notices addition, any increased liquidity on the Exchange would result in enhanced market quality for all participants. Finally, to the extent the proposed change continues to attract greater volume and liquidity, the Exchange believes the proposed change would improve the Exchange’s overall competitiveness and strengthen its market quality for all market participants. In the backdrop of the competitive environment in which the Exchange operates, the proposed rule change is a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase the depth of its market and improve its market share relative to its competitors. The Exchange’s fees are constrained by intermarket competition, as Floor Brokers may direct their order flow to any of the 16 options exchanges, including those offering rebates on QCC orders.13 Thus, Floor Brokers have a choice of where they direct their order flow, including their QCC transactions. The proposed rule change is designed to continue to incent Floor Brokers to direct liquidity to the Exchange and, in particular, QCC orders, thereby promoting market depth, price discovery and improvement, and enhanced order execution opportunities for market participants, particularly to the extent Floor Brokers are incentivized to aggregate their trading activity at the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposed administrative change with respect to the Premium Products Table is reasonable because it would update the table to reflect the current ticker symbols for all Premium Products, thereby ensuring that the Fee Schedule clearly and accurately sets forth the products subject to the fees in Section III.D. jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES The Proposed Rule Change Is an Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable allocation of its fees and credits. The proposed modification of QCC credits is based on the amount and type of business transacted on the Exchange, and Floor Brokers can attempt to trade QCC orders to earn the increased credits or not. In addition, the proposed credits are 13 See, e.g., EDGX Options Exchange Fee Schedule, QCC Initiator/Solicitation Rebate Tiers (applying ($0.22) per contract rebate up to 999,999 contracts for QCC transactions with non-customers on both sides); BOX Options Fee Schedule at Section IV.D.1. (QCC Rebate) (providing for ($0.22) per contract rebate up to 1,499,999 contracts for QCC transactions when both parties are a brokerdealer or market maker); Nasdaq ISE, Options 7, Section 6.A. (QCC and Solicitation Rebate) (offering rebates on QCC transactions of up to ($0.11) on 1,000,000 or more contract sides in a month). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 12, 2022 Jkt 256001 available to all Floor Brokers equally. The Exchange also believes that the proposed credits are an equitable allocation of fees and credits because they would encourage and support Floor Brokers’ role in facilitating the execution of orders on the Exchange, and to the extent the proposed credits incent Floor Brokers to direct increased liquidity to the Exchange, all market participants would benefit from enhanced opportunities for price improvement and order execution. Moreover, the proposed credits are designed to incent Floor Brokers to encourage OTP Holders to aggregate their executions—particularly QCC transactions—at the Exchange as a primary execution venue. To the extent that the proposed changes attract more QCC volume to the Exchange, this increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for, among other things, order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change would improve market quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby improving market-wide quality and price discovery. The Exchange also believes that the proposed change relating to the Premium Products Table is equitable because it would ensure that the table accurately reflects the ticker symbol for all Premium Products, to the benefit of all OTP Holders. The Proposed Rule Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory The Exchange believes it is not unfairly discriminatory to modify the credits offered to Floor Brokers on QCC orders because the proposed credits would be available to all similarlysituated Floor Brokers on an equal and non-discriminatory basis. The proposed credits are also not unfairly discriminatory to non-Floor Brokers because Floor Brokers serve an important function in facilitating the execution of orders on the Exchange (including via open outcry), which the Exchange wishes to encourage and support to promote price improvement opportunities for all market participants. The proposal is based on the amount and type of business transacted on the Exchange, and Floor Brokers are not obligated to execute QCC orders. Rather, the proposal is designed to encourage Floor Brokers to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue for all transactions (if they have not done so previously) and increase QCC volume sent to the Exchange. To the extent that PO 00000 Frm 00118 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 56105 the proposed change attracts more QCC orders to the Exchange, this increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change would improve market quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby improving market-wide quality and price discovery. The resulting increased volume and liquidity would provide more trading opportunities and tighter spreads to all market participants and thus would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange also believes that the proposed change to modify the Premium Products Table is not unfairly discriminatory because it is designed to update the table to include the current ticker symbol for all Premium Products, to the benefit of all OTP Holders. Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange’s statement regarding the burden on competition. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities for all market participants. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed change furthers the Commission’s goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, which promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.’’ 14 Intramarket Competition. The proposed increased credits are designed to attract additional order flow to the Exchange (particularly in Floor Brokers’ QCC transactions), which could increase the volumes of contracts traded on the Exchange. Greater liquidity benefits all 14 See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 10, at 37499. E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES 56106 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2022 / Notices market participants on the Exchange, and increased QCC transactions would increase opportunities for execution of other trading interest. The proposed credits would be available to all similarly-situated Floor Brokers that execute QCC trades, and to the extent that there is an additional competitive burden on non-Floor Brokers, the Exchange believes that any such burden would be appropriate because Floor Brokers serve an important function in facilitating the execution of orders (including via open outcry) and price discovery for all market participants. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change relating to the Premium Products Table would impose any burden on intramarket competition, as it is merely intended to improve the clarity of the Fee Schedule by ensuring that the table reflects all Premium Products’ current ticker symbols. Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one of the 16 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange. Based on publiclyavailable information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.15 Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. More specifically, in July 2022, the Exchange had less than 8% market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.16 The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment because it modifies the Exchange’s fees in a manner designed to incent Floor Brokers to direct trading interest (particularly QCC transactions) to the Exchange, to provide liquidity and to attract order flow. To the extent that Floor Brokers are incentivized to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue for all transactions, all of the Exchange’s market participants should benefit from the improved market quality and increased opportunities for price improvement. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment. The Exchange further believes that the proposed change could promote competition between the Exchange and other execution venues, including those that currently offer rebates on QCC transactions, by encouraging additional orders (and, in particular, QCC orders) to be sent to the Exchange for execution.17 The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change to update the Premium Products Table would impact intermarket competition because the proposed modification of the table is intended only to ensure that it reflects the accurate ticker symbol for all Premium Products, thereby improving the clarity and accuracy of the Fee Schedule, reducing burdens on the marketplace, and facilitating investor protection. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 18 of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 19 thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 20 of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. 17 See note 13, supra. U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 19 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 20 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 18 15 15 See 16 See note 11, supra. note 12, supra. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 12, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NYSEAMER–2022–39 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEAMER–2022–39. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEAMER–2022–39, and should be submitted on or before October 4, 2022. E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2022 / Notices For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.21 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2022–19683 Filed 9–12–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–95697; File No. SR– NYSECHX–2022–20] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Chicago, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Transfer the Services and Fees Related to Colocation September 7, 2022. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that on August 24, 2022, NYSE Chicago, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Chicago’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to (1) transfer the services and fees related to colocation from its Fee Schedule to the schedule of Wireless Connectivity Fees and Charges, and (2) change the name of the schedule of Wireless Connectivity Fees and Charges to the ‘‘Connectivity Fee Schedule.’’ The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text 21 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 12, 2022 Jkt 256001 of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to (1) transfer the services and fees related to colocation from the Fee Schedule to the schedule of Wireless Connectivity Fees and Charges (‘‘Connectivity Fee Schedule’’), and (2) change the name of the schedule of Wireless Connectivity Fees and Charges to the ‘‘Connectivity Fee Schedule.’’ There would be no changes to the existing colocation services and fees as a result of these administrative changes. Background The colocation services and related fees offered by the Exchange are currently listed in the Exchange’s Fee Schedule. Each of the Exchange’s Affiliate SROs 4 similarly includes the colocation services and related fees in its own separate price list or fee schedule.5 The colocation portions of each of these price lists and fee schedules are substantively identical. In December 2020, the Exchange and the Affiliate SROs created the Connectivity Fee Schedule to list their wireless connectivity services and related fees. Instead of including the wireless connectivity services and related fees in the seven price lists and fee schedules of the Exchange and the Affiliate SROs, the Connectivity Fee Schedule contains the wireless 4 The ‘‘Affiliate SROs’’ are the Exchange’s affiliates New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., and NYSE National, Inc. 5 See ‘‘Co-Location Fees’’ in ‘‘New York Stock Exchange Price List 2022’’ at https:// www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/ NYSE_Price_List.pdf; ‘‘NYSE American Equities Price List’’ at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/ nyse/markets/nyse-american/NYSE_America_ Equities_Price_List.pdf; ‘‘NYSE American Options Fee Schedule’’ at https://www.nyse.com/ publicdocs/nyse/markets/american-options/NYSE_ American_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf; ‘‘NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges’’ at https:// www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse-arca/ NYSE_Arca_Marketplace_Fees.pdf; ‘‘NYSE Arca Options Fees and Charges’’ at https:// www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/arcaoptions/NYSE_Arca_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf; ‘‘Fee Schedule of NYSE Chicago, Inc.’’ at https:// www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/NYSE_Chicago_ Fee_Schedule.pdf; and ‘‘NYSE National, Inc. Schedule of Fees and Rebates’’ at https:// www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/regulation/nyse/ NYSE_National_Schedule_of_Fees.pdf. PO 00000 Frm 00120 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 56107 connectivity services and charges for the Exchange and the Affiliate SROs in one single fee schedule. In an administrative change, the Exchange now proposes to remove its colocation services and related fees from its Fee Schedule and to move them into the Connectivity Fee Schedule, so that services and fees related to connectivity within, into and from the Mahwah Data Center would appear in the same Connectivity Fee Schedule. Each of the Affiliate SROs is contemporaneously making a similar filing.6 To reflect the fact that the schedule would include services and fees for connectivity with the Mahwah Data Center that are not wireless, the Exchange also proposes to change its name to the ‘‘Connectivity Fee Schedule.’’ Proposed Amendments to the Fee Schedule As shown in the attached Exhibit 5A [sic], the Exchange proposes to delete the entirety of the text in the Exchange’s Fee Schedule under the heading ‘‘CoLocation Fees.’’ Proposed Amendments to the Connectivity Fee Schedule As shown in the attached Exhibit 5B [sic], the Exchange proposes to amend the title to the ‘‘Connectivity Fee Schedule.’’ The Exchange proposes to insert the entirety of the text currently located in the Exchange’s Fee Schedule under the heading ‘‘Co-Location Fees’’ into the Connectivity Fee Schedule under the heading ‘‘A. Colocation Fees.’’ No changes would be made to any of this text, except for the following clarifying and non-substantive changes: 1. The subheading ‘‘Definitions’’ would be amended to ‘‘Colocation Definitions.’’ 2. The subheading ‘‘General Notes’’ would be amended to ‘‘Colocation Notes’’ and current General Note 1 would be deleted, as it would no longer be necessary since it would be duplicative of the existing General Note in the Connectivity Fee Schedule. The remainder of the current General Notes 2–8 would be renumbered as Colocation Notes 1–7 and the cross references in current General Note 8 would be updated accordingly. 3. In a conforming change, in the table of services and fees, the note to the Partial Cabinet Solution bundles would be amended to change the cross 6 Each of the Affiliate SROs has submitted substantially similar rule changes to move their colocation price lists to the Connectivity Fee Schedule. See SR–NYSE–2022–40, SR– NYSEAMER–2022–37, SR–NYSEARCA–2022–56, and SR–NYSENAT–2022–16. E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56103-56107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-95694; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2022-39]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify 
the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule

September 7, 2022.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that, on August 31, 2022, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE American Options Fee 
Schedule (``Fee Schedule'') regarding credits for certain Qualified 
Contingent Cross (``QCC'') transactions and to make an administrative 
change. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective 
September 1, 2022. The proposed rule change is available on the 
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

[[Page 56104]]

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing to amend the Fee Schedule to (1) modify 
Floor Broker credits for QCC transactions,\4\ and (2) make an 
administrative change to the table setting forth fees for Premium 
Products to reflect a ticker symbol change. The Exchange proposes to 
implement the rule change on September 1, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ A QCC is comprised of an originating order to buy or sell at 
least 1,000 contracts, or 10,000 mini-options contracts, that is 
identified as being part of a qualified contingent trade (as such 
term is defined in Commentary .01 to Rule 900.3NY), coupled with a 
contra side order or orders totaling an equal number of contracts. 
See Rule 900.3NY(y).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Floor Broker QCC Credits
    The Exchange proposes to modify the credits available to Floor 
Brokers on QCC orders. Currently, Floor Brokers earn a credit for 
executed QCC orders of ($0.07) per contract for the first 300,000 
contracts or ($0.10) per contract in excess of 300,000.\5\ The Exchange 
currently limits the maximum Floor Broker credit to $525,000 per month 
per Floor Broker firm.\6\ QCC executions in which a Customer or 
Professional Customer, or both, is on both sides of the QCC trade are 
not eligible for the Floor Broker credit, and the Floor Broker credit 
is paid only on volume within the applicable tier and is not 
retroactive to the first contract traded.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Fee Schedule, Section I.F., QCC Fees & Credits, 
available here, https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/american-options/NYSE_American_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf. See id., 
Section I.F., Footnote 1.
    \6\ See id., Section I.F. Footnote 1.
    \7\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to increase the amount of the credits 
available to Floor Brokers for executed QCC orders. Specifically, the 
Exchange proposes that Floor Brokers may earn a credit of ($0.08) per 
contract for the first 300,000 contracts and a credit of ($0.11) per 
contract on all contracts above 300,000 in a month.
    Although the Exchange cannot predict with certainty whether the 
proposed change would encourage Floor Brokers to increase their QCC 
volume, the proposed change is intended to continue to incent 
additional QCC executions by Floor Brokers by increasing the credits 
available on such orders, and all Floor Brokers are eligible to qualify 
for the proposed credits.
Ticker Symbol Change
    The Exchange proposes to make an administrative change to Section 
III.D. of the Fee Schedule to reflect a ticker symbol change. Section 
III.D., NYSE American Options Market Maker Monthly Premium Product Fee, 
sets forth the monthly fee assessed to NYSE American Options Market 
Makers that transact in certain Premium Products set forth in a table 
(the ``Premium Products Table'') in this section of the Fee Schedule. 
One such product, Meta Platforms, Inc., changed its trading symbol from 
FB to META effective June 9, 2022. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes 
to update the Premium Products Table to replace ``FB'' with ``META.'' 
The Exchange believes this proposed change would improve the clarity 
and accuracy of the Fee Schedule by ensuring that the Premium Products 
Table reflects the current ticker symbol for all Premium Products.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\9\ in particular, 
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons 
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between 
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposed Rule Change is Reasonable
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The 
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over 
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services 
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission 
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and 
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the 
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market 
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors 
and listed companies.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS 
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for 
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding 
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market 
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options 
trades.\11\ Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power 
in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. 
More specifically, in July 2022, the Exchange had less than 8% market 
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options 
trades.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety 
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, 
available here: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics.
    \12\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of 
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see 
id., the Exchange's market share in equity-based options was 7.53% 
for the month of July 2021 and 7.26% for the month of July 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of 
products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces 
constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated otherwise, changes 
to exchange transaction fees can have a direct effect on the ability of 
an exchange to compete for order flow.
    To respond to this competitive marketplace, the Exchange has 
established incentives to assist Floor Brokers in attracting more 
business to the Exchange--including credits on QCC transactions--as 
such participants serve an important function in facilitating the 
execution of orders on the Exchange (including via open outcry), 
thereby promoting price discovery on the public markets.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed modification of the credits 
offered to Floor Brokers on QCC transactions is reasonable because it 
is designed to continue to incent Floor Brokers to increase the number 
of QCC transactions sent to the Exchange. To the extent that the 
proposed change attracts more volume to the Exchange, this increased 
order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue 
for order execution, which, in turn, promotes just and equitable 
principles of trade and removes impediments to and perfects the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. The 
Exchange notes that all market participants stand to benefit from any 
increase in volume by Floor Brokers, which could promote market depth, 
facilitate tighter spreads and enhance price discovery to the extent 
the proposed change encourages Floor Brokers to utilize the Exchange as 
a primary trading venue, and may lead to a corresponding increase in 
order flow from other market participants. In

[[Page 56105]]

addition, any increased liquidity on the Exchange would result in 
enhanced market quality for all participants.
    Finally, to the extent the proposed change continues to attract 
greater volume and liquidity, the Exchange believes the proposed change 
would improve the Exchange's overall competitiveness and strengthen its 
market quality for all market participants. In the backdrop of the 
competitive environment in which the Exchange operates, the proposed 
rule change is a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase the 
depth of its market and improve its market share relative to its 
competitors. The Exchange's fees are constrained by intermarket 
competition, as Floor Brokers may direct their order flow to any of the 
16 options exchanges, including those offering rebates on QCC 
orders.\13\ Thus, Floor Brokers have a choice of where they direct 
their order flow, including their QCC transactions. The proposed rule 
change is designed to continue to incent Floor Brokers to direct 
liquidity to the Exchange and, in particular, QCC orders, thereby 
promoting market depth, price discovery and improvement, and enhanced 
order execution opportunities for market participants, particularly to 
the extent Floor Brokers are incentivized to aggregate their trading 
activity at the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See, e.g., EDGX Options Exchange Fee Schedule, QCC 
Initiator/Solicitation Rebate Tiers (applying ($0.22) per contract 
rebate up to 999,999 contracts for QCC transactions with non-
customers on both sides); BOX Options Fee Schedule at Section 
IV.D.1. (QCC Rebate) (providing for ($0.22) per contract rebate up 
to 1,499,999 contracts for QCC transactions when both parties are a 
broker-dealer or market maker); Nasdaq ISE, Options 7, Section 6.A. 
(QCC and Solicitation Rebate) (offering rebates on QCC transactions 
of up to ($0.11) on 1,000,000 or more contract sides in a month).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed administrative change with 
respect to the Premium Products Table is reasonable because it would 
update the table to reflect the current ticker symbols for all Premium 
Products, thereby ensuring that the Fee Schedule clearly and accurately 
sets forth the products subject to the fees in Section III.D.
The Proposed Rule Change Is an Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable 
allocation of its fees and credits. The proposed modification of QCC 
credits is based on the amount and type of business transacted on the 
Exchange, and Floor Brokers can attempt to trade QCC orders to earn the 
increased credits or not. In addition, the proposed credits are 
available to all Floor Brokers equally. The Exchange also believes that 
the proposed credits are an equitable allocation of fees and credits 
because they would encourage and support Floor Brokers' role in 
facilitating the execution of orders on the Exchange, and to the extent 
the proposed credits incent Floor Brokers to direct increased liquidity 
to the Exchange, all market participants would benefit from enhanced 
opportunities for price improvement and order execution.
    Moreover, the proposed credits are designed to incent Floor Brokers 
to encourage OTP Holders to aggregate their executions--particularly 
QCC transactions--at the Exchange as a primary execution venue. To the 
extent that the proposed changes attract more QCC volume to the 
Exchange, this increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange 
a more competitive venue for, among other things, order execution. 
Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change would improve 
market quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a 
consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby improving 
market-wide quality and price discovery.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed change relating to the 
Premium Products Table is equitable because it would ensure that the 
table accurately reflects the ticker symbol for all Premium Products, 
to the benefit of all OTP Holders.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
    The Exchange believes it is not unfairly discriminatory to modify 
the credits offered to Floor Brokers on QCC orders because the proposed 
credits would be available to all similarly-situated Floor Brokers on 
an equal and non-discriminatory basis. The proposed credits are also 
not unfairly discriminatory to non-Floor Brokers because Floor Brokers 
serve an important function in facilitating the execution of orders on 
the Exchange (including via open outcry), which the Exchange wishes to 
encourage and support to promote price improvement opportunities for 
all market participants.
    The proposal is based on the amount and type of business transacted 
on the Exchange, and Floor Brokers are not obligated to execute QCC 
orders. Rather, the proposal is designed to encourage Floor Brokers to 
utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue for all transactions 
(if they have not done so previously) and increase QCC volume sent to 
the Exchange. To the extent that the proposed change attracts more QCC 
orders to the Exchange, this increased order flow would continue to 
make the Exchange a more competitive venue for order execution. Thus, 
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change would improve market 
quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a 
consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby improving 
market-wide quality and price discovery. The resulting increased volume 
and liquidity would provide more trading opportunities and tighter 
spreads to all market participants and thus would promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, 
in general, protect investors and the public interest.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed change to modify the 
Premium Products Table is not unfairly discriminatory because it is 
designed to update the table to include the current ticker symbol for 
all Premium Products, to the benefit of all OTP Holders.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant 
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement 
regarding the burden on competition.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does 
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes 
that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional 
liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price 
discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities 
for all market participants. As a result, the Exchange believes that 
the proposed change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting 
Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, which 
promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of 
orders, large and small.'' \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 10, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intramarket Competition. The proposed increased credits are 
designed to attract additional order flow to the Exchange (particularly 
in Floor Brokers' QCC transactions), which could increase the volumes 
of contracts traded on the Exchange. Greater liquidity benefits all

[[Page 56106]]

market participants on the Exchange, and increased QCC transactions 
would increase opportunities for execution of other trading interest. 
The proposed credits would be available to all similarly-situated Floor 
Brokers that execute QCC trades, and to the extent that there is an 
additional competitive burden on non-Floor Brokers, the Exchange 
believes that any such burden would be appropriate because Floor 
Brokers serve an important function in facilitating the execution of 
orders (including via open outcry) and price discovery for all market 
participants.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change relating to 
the Premium Products Table would impose any burden on intramarket 
competition, as it is merely intended to improve the clarity of the Fee 
Schedule by ensuring that the table reflects all Premium Products' 
current ticker symbols.
    Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one 
of the 16 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a 
particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange 
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other 
exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange. Based on publicly-
available information, and excluding index-based options, no single 
exchange has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of 
multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\15\ Therefore, no 
exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of 
multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. More specifically, 
in July 2022, the Exchange had less than 8% market share of executed 
volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See note 11, supra.
    \16\ See note 12, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this 
competitive environment because it modifies the Exchange's fees in a 
manner designed to incent Floor Brokers to direct trading interest 
(particularly QCC transactions) to the Exchange, to provide liquidity 
and to attract order flow. To the extent that Floor Brokers are 
incentivized to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue for all 
transactions, all of the Exchange's market participants should benefit 
from the improved market quality and increased opportunities for price 
improvement.
    The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market 
in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In 
such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider 
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other 
exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that 
the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment. The 
Exchange further believes that the proposed change could promote 
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues, including 
those that currently offer rebates on QCC transactions, by encouraging 
additional orders (and, in particular, QCC orders) to be sent to the 
Exchange for execution.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See note 13, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change to update 
the Premium Products Table would impact intermarket competition because 
the proposed modification of the table is intended only to ensure that 
it reflects the accurate ticker symbol for all Premium Products, 
thereby improving the clarity and accuracy of the Fee Schedule, 
reducing burdens on the marketplace, and facilitating investor 
protection.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \18\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 
19b-4 \19\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other 
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \20\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2022-39 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2022-39. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2022-39, and should be 
submitted on or before October 4, 2022.


[[Page 56107]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-19683 Filed 9-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.