Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 54959-54961 [2022-19341]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2022 / Notices
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of our analysis of
the issues raised by the parties in any
written briefs, no later than 120 days
after the date of publication of these
preliminary results.
within 90 days of publication). The final
results of this administrative review
shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise under review and for
future cash deposits of estimated
antidumping duties, where applicable.
Assessment Rates
Cash Deposit Requirements
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Upon issuance of the final results,
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. If the weightedaverage dumping margin for a
mandatory respondent is not zero or de
minimis in the final results of this
review, we will calculate an importerspecific assessment rate on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for each importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of such
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).18 If the weighted-average
dumping margin is zero or de minimis
in the final results of review, or if an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis, Commerce will instruct
CBP to liquidate appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.19
For entries of subject merchandise
during the period of review produced by
the respondents for which they did not
know its merchandise was destined for
the United States, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate unreviewed entries
pursuant to the reseller policy, i.e., the
assessment rate for such entries will be
the all-others rate established in the
investigation if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.20
For the companies which were not
selected for individual examination, we
intend to assign an assessment rate
based on the methodology described in
the ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined
Companies’’ section.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
18 See
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103
(February 14, 2012).
19 Id., 77 FR at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2).
20 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Sep 07, 2022
Jkt 256001
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of
the final results of this administrative
review for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash deposit rate for companies subject
to this review will be equal to the
company-specific weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2)
for merchandise exported by a company
not covered in this review but covered
in a prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published in the
completed segment for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or the less-than-fair-value investigation,
but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established
in the most recently completed segment
of the proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 8.91 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.21 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results of review
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
21 See
PO 00000
Order, 82 FR at 40138.
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54959
Dated: August 31, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Recommendation
Appendix II
List of Companies Not Selected for
Individual Examination
1. Adinath International
2. Allena Group
3. Alloyed Steel
4. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd.
5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited
6. C. D. Industries
7. Cetus Engineering Private Limited
8. CHW Forge
9. CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd.
10. Citizen Metal Depot
11. Corum Flange
12. DN Forge Industries
13. Echjay Forgings Limited
14. Falcon Valves and Flanges Private
Limited
15. Heubach International
16. Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd.
17. Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd.
18. Kinnari Steel Corporation
19. Mascot Metal Manufacturers
20. M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd.
21. Munish Forge Private Limited
22. OM Exports
23. Punjab Steel Works
24. Raaj Sagar Steels
25. Ravi Ratan Metal Industries
26. R. D. Forge
27. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd.
28. Rollwell Forge Engineering Components
and Flanges
29. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd.
30. SHM (ShinHeung Machinery)
31. Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes
32. Sizer India
33. Steel Shape India
34. Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd.
35. Tirupati Forge Pvt. Ltd.
36. Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited
[FR Doc. 2022–19367 Filed 9–7–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–827]
Certain Cased Pencils From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2020–2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
54960
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2022 / Notices
The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) has completed
its administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
cased pencils (cased pencils) from the
People’s Republic of China (China) for
the period of review (POR) December 1,
2020, through November 30, 2021. We
continue to find that the single entity
Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd./
Shandong Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd.
(Wah Yuen) had no shipments of cased
pencils during the POR. We also
continue to find that Tianjin Tonghe
Stationery Co., Ltd. (Tianjin Tonghe)
and Ningbo Homey Union Co., Ltd.
(Ningbo Homey) are not eligible for a
separate rate and should be treated as
part of the China-wide entity.
DATES: Applicable September 8, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sergio Balbontin, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–6478.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On July 19, 2022, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results in the
Federal Register.1 We invited interested
parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results; however, no interested parties
submitted comments. Accordingly, we
made no changes to the Preliminary
Results.
Scope of the Order 2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The merchandise covered by the
Order is certain cased pencils of any
shape or dimension (except as described
below) which are writing and/or
drawing instruments that feature cores
of graphite or other materials, encased
in wood and/or man-made materials,
whether or not decorated and whether
or not tipped (e.g., with erasers, etc.) in
any fashion, and either sharpened or
unsharpened. The pencils subject to the
Order are currently classifiable under
subheading 9609.10.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Specifically
excluded from the scope of the Order
are mechanical pencils, cosmetic
1 See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020–
2021, 87 FR 42998 (July 19, 2022).
2 See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s
Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping
Duty Order, 82 FR 41608 (September 1, 2017); and
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased Pencils
from the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 66909
(December 28, 1994) (collectively, Order).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Sep 07, 2022
Jkt 256001
pencils, pens, non-cased crayons (wax),
pastels, charcoals, chalks, and pencils
produced under U.S. patent number
6,217,242, from paper infused with
scents by the means covered in the
above-referenced patent, thereby having
odors distinct from those that may
emanate from pencils lacking the scent
infusion. Also excluded from the scope
of the Order are pencils with all of the
following physical characteristics: (1)
length: 13.5 or more inches; (2) sheath
diameter: not less than one-and-one
quarter inches at any point (before
sharpening); and (3) core length: not
more than 15 percent of the length of
the pencil.
In addition, pencils with all of the
following physical characteristics are
excluded from the scope of the Order:
novelty jumbo pencils that are octagonal
in shape, approximately ten inches long,
one inch in diameter before sharpening,
and three-and-one eighth inches in
circumference, composed of turned
wood encasing one-and-one half inches
of sharpened lead on one end and a
rubber eraser on the other end.
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise covered by the scope of the
Order is dispositive.
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
determined that Wah Yuen 3 had no
shipments of cased pencils during the
POR, based on our analysis of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
entry documentation and Wah Yuen’s
questionnaire responses. We received
no comments on our preliminary
finding. As there is no information on
the record that calls into question the
finding in the Preliminary Results, we
continue to find in the final results of
this review that Wah Yuen had no
3 In a prior administrative review, Commerce
determined that Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd. and
Shandong Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd. are
affiliated pursuant to section 771(33) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and should be
treated as a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR
351.401(f). See Certain Cased Pencils from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2014–
2015, 81 FR 37573 (June 10, 2016), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
at 9–10, unchanged in Certain Cased Pencils from
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2014–
2015, 81 FR 74764 (October 27, 2016); see also
Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of
China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 92784
(December 20, 2016) (Amended New Shipper
Review). We received no comments regarding our
treatment of these companies as a single entity and
therefore continue to collapse them for the final
results of this administrative review.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.
China-Wide Entity
With the exception of Wah Yuen, we
find all other companies for which a
review was requested to be part of the
China-wide entity, because they did not
file no-shipment statements, separate
rate applications, or separate rate
certifications. Accordingly, Tianjin
Tonghe and Ningbo Homey are part of
the China-wide entity. Because no party
requested a review of the China-wide
entity, and Commerce no longer
considers the China-wide entity as an
exporter conditionally subject to
administrative reviews, we did not
conduct a review of the China-wide
entity.4 Accordingly, the rate previously
established for the China-wide entity is
114.90 percent and is not subject to
change as a result of this review.5
Assessment Rates
Commerce will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries in accordance with
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1). Because we
determined that Tianjin Tonghe and
Ningbo Homey are not eligible for a
separate rate and are part of the Chinawide entity, we intend to instruct CBP
to apply an ad valorem assessment rate
of 114.90 percent (i.e., the China-wide
entity rate) to all entries of subject
merchandise during the POR that were
exported by these companies. In
addition, as Commerce continues to find
that Wah Yuen did not have any
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR, we will instruct CBP to
assess any suspended entries of subject
merchandise associated with Wah Yuen
at the China-wide rate.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of these final results of
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
5 See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 80 FR
26897 (May 11, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2022 / Notices
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
Wah Yuen’s cash deposit rate will
continue to be its existing exporterproducer specific rate, 30.55 percent; 6
(2) for previously investigated or
reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese
exporters for which a review was not
requested and that received a separate
rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate published for the most
recently-completed period; (3) for all
Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate for the
China-wide entity; and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the Chinese
exporter that supplied that non-Chinese
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
6 See
Amended New Shipper Review.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Sep 07, 2022
Jkt 256001
regulations and terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h) and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 26, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022–19341 Filed 9–7–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–017]
Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light
Truck Tires From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review and Rescission of Review, in
Part; 2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that countervailable
subsidies are being provided to
producers/exporters of certain passenger
vehicle and light truck tires (passenger
tires) from the People’s Republic of
China (China) during the period of
review (POR), January 1, 2020, through
December 31, 2020. In addition, we are
rescinding the review with respect to 12
companies. Interested parties are invited
to comment on these preliminary
results.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable September 8, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Czajkowski or Richard Roberts,
AD/CVD Operations, Office I,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1395 or
(202) 482–2631, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 6, 2020, Commerce
published the notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
passenger tires from China.1 On March
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR
55811 (October 7, 2021) (Initiation Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54961
30, 2022, Commerce exercised its
discretion to extend the preliminary
results of this administrative review by
120 days, until August 31, 2022.2
For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as the
appendix to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Scope of the Order 4
The products covered by the Order
are certain passenger vehicle and light
truck tires from China. For a complete
description of the scope of the Order,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Rescission of Administrative Review, in
Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the parties that requested a
review withdraw the request within 90
days of the date of publication of the
notice of initiation. Commerce received
timely-filed withdrawal requests with
respect to the following nine companies:
(1) Sailun Group Co., Ltd., formerly
known as Sailun Jinyu Group Co., Ltd.;
(2) Sailun Group (HongKong) Co.,
Limited., formerly known as Sailun
Jinyu Group (Hong Kong) Co., Limited;
(3) Sailun Tire Americas Inc., formerly
known as SJI North America Inc; 5 (4)
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and
Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of
China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2020,’’ dated March 30, 2022.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the 2020 Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review of Certain Passenger
Vehicles and Light Truck Tires from the People’s
Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
4 See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck
Tires from the People’s Republic of China:
Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty
Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; and
Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 80
FR 47902 (August 10, 2015) (Order).
5 See Sailum’s Letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty Order
on Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
Continued
08SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54959-54961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19341]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-827]
Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
[[Page 54960]]
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cased
pencils (cased pencils) from the People's Republic of China (China) for
the period of review (POR) December 1, 2020, through November 30, 2021.
We continue to find that the single entity Wah Yuen Stationery Co.
Ltd./Shandong Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd. (Wah Yuen) had no shipments
of cased pencils during the POR. We also continue to find that Tianjin
Tonghe Stationery Co., Ltd. (Tianjin Tonghe) and Ningbo Homey Union
Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Homey) are not eligible for a separate rate and
should be treated as part of the China-wide entity.
DATES: Applicable September 8, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sergio Balbontin, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6478.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 19, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results in the
Federal Register.1 We invited interested parties to comment
on the Preliminary Results; however, no interested parties submitted
comments. Accordingly, we made no changes to the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020-2021, 87 FR
42998 (July 19, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of
China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 41608
(September 1, 2017); and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased
Pencils from the People's Republic of China, 59 FR 66909 (December
28, 1994) (collectively, Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by the Order is certain cased pencils of
any shape or dimension (except as described below) which are writing
and/or drawing instruments that feature cores of graphite or other
materials, encased in wood and/or man-made materials, whether or not
decorated and whether or not tipped (e.g., with erasers, etc.) in any
fashion, and either sharpened or unsharpened. The pencils subject to
the Order are currently classifiable under subheading 9609.10.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Specifically
excluded from the scope of the Order are mechanical pencils, cosmetic
pencils, pens, non-cased crayons (wax), pastels, charcoals, chalks, and
pencils produced under U.S. patent number 6,217,242, from paper infused
with scents by the means covered in the above-referenced patent,
thereby having odors distinct from those that may emanate from pencils
lacking the scent infusion. Also excluded from the scope of the Order
are pencils with all of the following physical characteristics: (1)
length: 13.5 or more inches; (2) sheath diameter: not less than one-
and-one quarter inches at any point (before sharpening); and (3) core
length: not more than 15 percent of the length of the pencil.
In addition, pencils with all of the following physical
characteristics are excluded from the scope of the Order: novelty jumbo
pencils that are octagonal in shape, approximately ten inches long, one
inch in diameter before sharpening, and three-and-one eighth inches in
circumference, composed of turned wood encasing one-and-one half inches
of sharpened lead on one end and a rubber eraser on the other end.
Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise covered by
the scope of the Order is dispositive.
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that Wah Yuen \3\
had no shipments of cased pencils during the POR, based on our analysis
of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry documentation and Wah
Yuen's questionnaire responses. We received no comments on our
preliminary finding. As there is no information on the record that
calls into question the finding in the Preliminary Results, we continue
to find in the final results of this review that Wah Yuen had no
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In a prior administrative review, Commerce determined that
Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd. and Shandong Wah Yuen Stationery Co.
Ltd. are affiliated pursuant to section 771(33) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and should be treated as a single entity
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f). See Certain Cased Pencils from the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 37573 (June 10, 2016), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 9-10, unchanged in
Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR
74764 (October 27, 2016); see also Certain Cased Pencils from the
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 92784 (December 20, 2016)
(Amended New Shipper Review). We received no comments regarding our
treatment of these companies as a single entity and therefore
continue to collapse them for the final results of this
administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
China-Wide Entity
With the exception of Wah Yuen, we find all other companies for
which a review was requested to be part of the China-wide entity,
because they did not file no-shipment statements, separate rate
applications, or separate rate certifications. Accordingly, Tianjin
Tonghe and Ningbo Homey are part of the China-wide entity. Because no
party requested a review of the China-wide entity, and Commerce no
longer considers the China-wide entity as an exporter conditionally
subject to administrative reviews, we did not conduct a review of the
China-wide entity.\4\ Accordingly, the rate previously established for
the China-wide entity is 114.90 percent and is not subject to change as
a result of this review.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
\5\ See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2012-2013, 80 FR 26897 (May 11, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Because we determined that Tianjin
Tonghe and Ningbo Homey are not eligible for a separate rate and are
part of the China-wide entity, we intend to instruct CBP to apply an ad
valorem assessment rate of 114.90 percent (i.e., the China-wide entity
rate) to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR that were
exported by these companies. In addition, as Commerce continues to find
that Wah Yuen did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during
the POR, we will instruct CBP to assess any suspended entries of
subject merchandise associated with Wah Yuen at the China-wide rate.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of these final results of
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
[[Page 54961]]
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results
of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act: (1) Wah Yuen's cash deposit rate will continue to be its
existing exporter-producer specific rate, 30.55 percent; \6\ (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters
for which a review was not requested and that received a separate rate
in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate published for the
most recently-completed period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of
subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-
wide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied
that non-Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Amended New Shipper Review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 26, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-19341 Filed 9-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P