Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 54959-54961 [2022-19341]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2022 / Notices Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in any written briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results. within 90 days of publication). The final results of this administrative review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise under review and for future cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties, where applicable. Assessment Rates Cash Deposit Requirements khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If the weightedaverage dumping margin for a mandatory respondent is not zero or de minimis in the final results of this review, we will calculate an importerspecific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).18 If the weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, or if an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.19 For entries of subject merchandise during the period of review produced by the respondents for which they did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries pursuant to the reseller policy, i.e., the assessment rate for such entries will be the all-others rate established in the investigation if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.20 For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, we intend to assign an assessment rate based on the methodology described in the ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined Companies’’ section. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 18 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). 19 Id., 77 FR at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 20 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Sep 07, 2022 Jkt 256001 The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication in the Federal Register of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by a company not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published in the completed segment for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the most recently completed segment of the proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 8.91 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.21 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 21 See PO 00000 Order, 82 FR at 40138. Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54959 Dated: August 31, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies V. Discussion of the Methodology VI. Recommendation Appendix II List of Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 1. Adinath International 2. Allena Group 3. Alloyed Steel 4. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd. 5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited 6. C. D. Industries 7. Cetus Engineering Private Limited 8. CHW Forge 9. CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd. 10. Citizen Metal Depot 11. Corum Flange 12. DN Forge Industries 13. Echjay Forgings Limited 14. Falcon Valves and Flanges Private Limited 15. Heubach International 16. Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd. 17. Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd. 18. Kinnari Steel Corporation 19. Mascot Metal Manufacturers 20. M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd. 21. Munish Forge Private Limited 22. OM Exports 23. Punjab Steel Works 24. Raaj Sagar Steels 25. Ravi Ratan Metal Industries 26. R. D. Forge 27. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd. 28. Rollwell Forge Engineering Components and Flanges 29. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd. 30. SHM (ShinHeung Machinery) 31. Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes 32. Sizer India 33. Steel Shape India 34. Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd. 35. Tirupati Forge Pvt. Ltd. 36. Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited [FR Doc. 2022–19367 Filed 9–7–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–827] Certain Cased Pencils From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1 54960 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2022 / Notices The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cased pencils (cased pencils) from the People’s Republic of China (China) for the period of review (POR) December 1, 2020, through November 30, 2021. We continue to find that the single entity Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd./ Shandong Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd. (Wah Yuen) had no shipments of cased pencils during the POR. We also continue to find that Tianjin Tonghe Stationery Co., Ltd. (Tianjin Tonghe) and Ningbo Homey Union Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Homey) are not eligible for a separate rate and should be treated as part of the China-wide entity. DATES: Applicable September 8, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sergio Balbontin, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6478. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background On July 19, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results in the Federal Register.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results; however, no interested parties submitted comments. Accordingly, we made no changes to the Preliminary Results. Scope of the Order 2 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES The merchandise covered by the Order is certain cased pencils of any shape or dimension (except as described below) which are writing and/or drawing instruments that feature cores of graphite or other materials, encased in wood and/or man-made materials, whether or not decorated and whether or not tipped (e.g., with erasers, etc.) in any fashion, and either sharpened or unsharpened. The pencils subject to the Order are currently classifiable under subheading 9609.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Specifically excluded from the scope of the Order are mechanical pencils, cosmetic 1 See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020– 2021, 87 FR 42998 (July 19, 2022). 2 See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 41608 (September 1, 2017); and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 66909 (December 28, 1994) (collectively, Order). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Sep 07, 2022 Jkt 256001 pencils, pens, non-cased crayons (wax), pastels, charcoals, chalks, and pencils produced under U.S. patent number 6,217,242, from paper infused with scents by the means covered in the above-referenced patent, thereby having odors distinct from those that may emanate from pencils lacking the scent infusion. Also excluded from the scope of the Order are pencils with all of the following physical characteristics: (1) length: 13.5 or more inches; (2) sheath diameter: not less than one-and-one quarter inches at any point (before sharpening); and (3) core length: not more than 15 percent of the length of the pencil. In addition, pencils with all of the following physical characteristics are excluded from the scope of the Order: novelty jumbo pencils that are octagonal in shape, approximately ten inches long, one inch in diameter before sharpening, and three-and-one eighth inches in circumference, composed of turned wood encasing one-and-one half inches of sharpened lead on one end and a rubber eraser on the other end. Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise covered by the scope of the Order is dispositive. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that Wah Yuen 3 had no shipments of cased pencils during the POR, based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry documentation and Wah Yuen’s questionnaire responses. We received no comments on our preliminary finding. As there is no information on the record that calls into question the finding in the Preliminary Results, we continue to find in the final results of this review that Wah Yuen had no 3 In a prior administrative review, Commerce determined that Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd. and Shandong Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd. are affiliated pursuant to section 771(33) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and should be treated as a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f). See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2014– 2015, 81 FR 37573 (June 10, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 9–10, unchanged in Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2014– 2015, 81 FR 74764 (October 27, 2016); see also Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 92784 (December 20, 2016) (Amended New Shipper Review). We received no comments regarding our treatment of these companies as a single entity and therefore continue to collapse them for the final results of this administrative review. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. China-Wide Entity With the exception of Wah Yuen, we find all other companies for which a review was requested to be part of the China-wide entity, because they did not file no-shipment statements, separate rate applications, or separate rate certifications. Accordingly, Tianjin Tonghe and Ningbo Homey are part of the China-wide entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity, and Commerce no longer considers the China-wide entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews, we did not conduct a review of the China-wide entity.4 Accordingly, the rate previously established for the China-wide entity is 114.90 percent and is not subject to change as a result of this review.5 Assessment Rates Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Because we determined that Tianjin Tonghe and Ningbo Homey are not eligible for a separate rate and are part of the Chinawide entity, we intend to instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 114.90 percent (i.e., the China-wide entity rate) to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR that were exported by these companies. In addition, as Commerce continues to find that Wah Yuen did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, we will instruct CBP to assess any suspended entries of subject merchandise associated with Wah Yuen at the China-wide rate. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of these final results of review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). 4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 5 See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 80 FR 26897 (May 11, 2015). E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2022 / Notices Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) Wah Yuen’s cash deposit rate will continue to be its existing exporterproducer specific rate, 30.55 percent; 6 (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters for which a review was not requested and that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate published for the most recently-completed period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-wide entity; and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 6 See Amended New Shipper Review. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Sep 07, 2022 Jkt 256001 regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: August 26, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2022–19341 Filed 9–7–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–017] Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers/exporters of certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires (passenger tires) from the People’s Republic of China (China) during the period of review (POR), January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. In addition, we are rescinding the review with respect to 12 companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. AGENCY: DATES: Applicable September 8, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Czajkowski or Richard Roberts, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1395 or (202) 482–2631, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 6, 2020, Commerce published the notice of initiation of an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on passenger tires from China.1 On March 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 55811 (October 7, 2021) (Initiation Notice). PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54961 30, 2022, Commerce exercised its discretion to extend the preliminary results of this administrative review by 120 days, until August 31, 2022.2 For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as the appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Scope of the Order 4 The products covered by the Order are certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the parties that requested a review withdraw the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation. Commerce received timely-filed withdrawal requests with respect to the following nine companies: (1) Sailun Group Co., Ltd., formerly known as Sailun Jinyu Group Co., Ltd.; (2) Sailun Group (HongKong) Co., Limited., formerly known as Sailun Jinyu Group (Hong Kong) Co., Limited; (3) Sailun Tire Americas Inc., formerly known as SJI North America Inc; 5 (4) 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020,’’ dated March 30, 2022. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2020 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Certain Passenger Vehicles and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 4 See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; and Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 47902 (August 10, 2015) (Order). 5 See Sailum’s Letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty Order on Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM Continued 08SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54959-54961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-827]


Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


[[Page 54960]]


SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cased 
pencils (cased pencils) from the People's Republic of China (China) for 
the period of review (POR) December 1, 2020, through November 30, 2021. 
We continue to find that the single entity Wah Yuen Stationery Co. 
Ltd./Shandong Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd. (Wah Yuen) had no shipments 
of cased pencils during the POR. We also continue to find that Tianjin 
Tonghe Stationery Co., Ltd. (Tianjin Tonghe) and Ningbo Homey Union 
Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Homey) are not eligible for a separate rate and 
should be treated as part of the China-wide entity.

DATES: Applicable September 8, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sergio Balbontin, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6478.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 19, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results in the 
Federal Register.1 We invited interested parties to comment 
on the Preliminary Results; however, no interested parties submitted 
comments. Accordingly, we made no changes to the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 
and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020-2021, 87 FR 
42998 (July 19, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order 2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of 
China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 41608 
(September 1, 2017); and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased 
Pencils from the People's Republic of China, 59 FR 66909 (December 
28, 1994) (collectively, Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise covered by the Order is certain cased pencils of 
any shape or dimension (except as described below) which are writing 
and/or drawing instruments that feature cores of graphite or other 
materials, encased in wood and/or man-made materials, whether or not 
decorated and whether or not tipped (e.g., with erasers, etc.) in any 
fashion, and either sharpened or unsharpened. The pencils subject to 
the Order are currently classifiable under subheading 9609.10.00 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Specifically 
excluded from the scope of the Order are mechanical pencils, cosmetic 
pencils, pens, non-cased crayons (wax), pastels, charcoals, chalks, and 
pencils produced under U.S. patent number 6,217,242, from paper infused 
with scents by the means covered in the above-referenced patent, 
thereby having odors distinct from those that may emanate from pencils 
lacking the scent infusion. Also excluded from the scope of the Order 
are pencils with all of the following physical characteristics: (1) 
length: 13.5 or more inches; (2) sheath diameter: not less than one-
and-one quarter inches at any point (before sharpening); and (3) core 
length: not more than 15 percent of the length of the pencil.
    In addition, pencils with all of the following physical 
characteristics are excluded from the scope of the Order: novelty jumbo 
pencils that are octagonal in shape, approximately ten inches long, one 
inch in diameter before sharpening, and three-and-one eighth inches in 
circumference, composed of turned wood encasing one-and-one half inches 
of sharpened lead on one end and a rubber eraser on the other end.
    Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise covered by 
the scope of the Order is dispositive.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that Wah Yuen \3\ 
had no shipments of cased pencils during the POR, based on our analysis 
of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry documentation and Wah 
Yuen's questionnaire responses. We received no comments on our 
preliminary finding. As there is no information on the record that 
calls into question the finding in the Preliminary Results, we continue 
to find in the final results of this review that Wah Yuen had no 
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In a prior administrative review, Commerce determined that 
Wah Yuen Stationery Co. Ltd. and Shandong Wah Yuen Stationery Co. 
Ltd. are affiliated pursuant to section 771(33) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act), and should be treated as a single entity 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f). See Certain Cased Pencils from the 
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
New Shipper Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 37573 (June 10, 2016), and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 9-10, unchanged in 
Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 
74764 (October 27, 2016); see also Certain Cased Pencils from the 
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty New Shipper Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 92784 (December 20, 2016) 
(Amended New Shipper Review). We received no comments regarding our 
treatment of these companies as a single entity and therefore 
continue to collapse them for the final results of this 
administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Entity

    With the exception of Wah Yuen, we find all other companies for 
which a review was requested to be part of the China-wide entity, 
because they did not file no-shipment statements, separate rate 
applications, or separate rate certifications. Accordingly, Tianjin 
Tonghe and Ningbo Homey are part of the China-wide entity. Because no 
party requested a review of the China-wide entity, and Commerce no 
longer considers the China-wide entity as an exporter conditionally 
subject to administrative reviews, we did not conduct a review of the 
China-wide entity.\4\ Accordingly, the rate previously established for 
the China-wide entity is 114.90 percent and is not subject to change as 
a result of this review.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
    \5\ See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2012-2013, 80 FR 26897 (May 11, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties 
on all appropriate entries in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of 
the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Because we determined that Tianjin 
Tonghe and Ningbo Homey are not eligible for a separate rate and are 
part of the China-wide entity, we intend to instruct CBP to apply an ad 
valorem assessment rate of 114.90 percent (i.e., the China-wide entity 
rate) to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR that were 
exported by these companies. In addition, as Commerce continues to find 
that Wah Yuen did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during 
the POR, we will instruct CBP to assess any suspended entries of 
subject merchandise associated with Wah Yuen at the China-wide rate.
    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of these final results of 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

[[Page 54961]]

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results 
of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of 
the Act: (1) Wah Yuen's cash deposit rate will continue to be its 
existing exporter-producer specific rate, 30.55 percent; \6\ (2) for 
previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters 
for which a review was not requested and that received a separate rate 
in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate published for the 
most recently-completed period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 
subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-
wide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject 
merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied 
that non-Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, 
shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Amended New Shipper Review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double 
antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: August 26, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-19341 Filed 9-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.