Ripe Olives From Spain: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020, 54460-54462 [2022-19198]

Download as PDF 54460 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 6, 2022 / Notices argument; and (3) a table of authorities. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.17 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published in accordance with section 781(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(i). U.S. International Trade Commission Notification DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Scope of the Order International Trade Administration Consistent with section 781(e) of the Act, Commerce has notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of this preliminary determination to include the merchandise subject to these circumvention inquiries within the Orders. Pursuant to section 781(e) of the Act, the ITC may request consultations concerning Commerce’s proposed inclusion of the inquiry merchandise. If, after consultations, the ITC believes that a significant injury issue is presented by the proposed inclusion, it will have 60 days from the date of notification by Commerce to provide written advice. [C–469–818] The products covered by the Order are ripe olives from Spain. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES Final Determinations According to section 781(f) of the Act, Commerce shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make its anti-circumvention determination within 300 days from the date of the initiation of the inquiry.18 Due to the complicated nature of these anti-circumvention inquiries, we are hereby extending the deadline for the final determinations of these anticircumvention inquiries by 73 days. Therefore, Commerce intends to issue the final determinations of these anticircumvention inquiries to December 2, 2022. 17 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 18 See also 19 CFR 351.225(f)(iii)(5) (explaining that Commerce will issue a final anticircumvention ruling ‘‘normally within 300 days from the date of the initiation of the . . . inquiry’’). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:04 Sep 02, 2022 Jkt 256001 Dated: August 26, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. Merchandise Subject to the Circumvention Inquiries V. Statutory and Regulatory Framework VI. Use of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences VII. Circumvention Determinations VIII. Country-Wide Determination IX. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–19124 Filed 9–2–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Ripe Olives From Spain: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers/exporters of ripe olives from Spain during the period of review, January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable September 6, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg or Theodore Pearson, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1785 or (202) 482–2631, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On August 1, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register the countervailing duty (CVD) order on ripe olives from Spain.1 On October 7, 2021, 1 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 37469 (August 1, 2018) (Order). PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Commerce published the notice of initiation of an administrative review of the Order.2 On March 29, 2022, Commerce extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this review by 120 days until August 31, 2022.3 For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4 A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as the appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Methodology Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, Commerce preliminarily determines that there is a subsidy (i.e., a financial contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific).6 For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, including our reliance, in part, on facts otherwise available pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 55811 (October 7, 2021). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020,’’ dated March 29, 2022. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2020 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Ripe Olives from Spain,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 5 Id. 6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM 06SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 6, 2022 / Notices Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review Producer/exporter jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES There are three companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents or found to be cross-owned with a mandatory respondent. For these companies, because the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents, Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla) and Angel Camacho Alimentacio´n, S.L. (Camacho), were above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we are applying to the non-selected companies the weighted average of the net subsidy rates calculated for Agro Sevilla and Camacho, which we calculated using the publicly-ranged sales data submitted by Agro Sevilla and Camacho.7 This methodology to establish the all-others subsidy rate is consistent with our practice and section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act which governs the calculation of the all-others rate in an investigation. For further information on the calculation of the non-selected respondent rate, see the section in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum entitled ‘‘Non-Selected Company Rate.’’ Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) 54461 section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Assessment Rates Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies 9 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L 6.68 determined subsidy rates in the Alimentary Group Dcoop S. amounts shown above for the producer/ Coop. And ......................... 6.68 Aceitunas Torrent, S.L .......... 6.68 exporters shown above. Upon completion of the administrative review, consistent with section 751(a)(1) Verification of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Commerce shall determine, and CBP Act, Commerce intends to verify the shall assess, CVDs on all appropriate information relied upon in its final entries covered by this review. We results of review. intend to issue assessment instructions Disclosure and Public Comment to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of We will disclose to parties in this this review in the Federal Register. If a review the calculations performed for timely summons is filed at the U.S. these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this Court of International Trade, the notice.10 A timeline for the submission assessment instructions will direct CBP of case and rebuttal briefs and written not to liquidate relevant entries until the comments will be provided to interested time for parties to file a request for a parties at a later date.11 Pursuant to 19 statutory injunction has expired (i.e., CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties within 90 days of publication). who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs Cash Deposit Requirements in this review are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of In accordance with section the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce also Preliminary Results of Review argument; and (3) a table of authorities. intends upon publication of the final All briefs must be filed electronically We preliminarily find the following using ACCESS. Note that Commerce has results, to instruct CBP to collect cash net countervailable subsidy rates exist deposits of estimated CVDs in the temporarily modified certain of its for the period January 1, 2020, through amounts calculated in the final results requirements for serving documents December 31, 2020: of this review for the respective containing business proprietary companies listed above with regard to information, until further notice.12 Subsidy rate shipments of subject merchandise Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), Producer/exporter (percent ad valorem) interested parties who wish to request a entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, hearing must submit a written request to for consumption on or after the date of Agro Sevilla Aceitunas the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement publication of the final results of this S.Coop. And ...................... 8.32 and Compliance, filed electronically via review. If the rate calculated in the final Angel Camacho ACCESS by 5 p.m. eastern time within results is zero or de minimis, no cash Alimentacio´n, S.L. and its 8 deposit will be required on shipments of cross-owned affiliates ..... 4.58 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain the the subject merchandise entered or party’s name, address, and telephone withdrawn from warehouse, for 7 With two respondents under examination, number, the number of participants, consumption on or after the date of Commerce normally calculates (A) a weightedwhether any participant is a foreign publication of the final results of this average of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for national, and a list of the issues to be review. the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of discussed. Oral presentations at the the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will hearing will be limited to issues raised examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average continue to collect cash deposits of of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the in the briefs. If a request for a hearing examined respondents using each company’s estimated CVDs at the all-others rate or is made, parties will be notified of the publicly-ranged U.S. sale values for the the most recent company-specific rate date and time for the hearing to be merchandise under consideration. Commerce then applicable to the company, as determined. compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate appropriate. These cash deposit closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all Unless extended, we intend to issue other producers and exporters. See, e.g., Ripe Olives the final results of this administrative requirements, when imposed, shall from Spain: Final Results of Countervailing Duty review, which will include the results of remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Review; 2019, 48 FR 13970 (March our analysis of the issues raised in the 11, 2022). Notification to Interested Parties 8 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision case briefs, no later than 120 days of Memorandum, Commerce found the following publication of these preliminary results These preliminary results and notice companies to be cross-owned with Angel Camacho in the Federal Register, pursuant to are issued and published in accordance ´ Alimentacion, S.L.: Grupo Angel Camacho, S.L., Cuarterola S.L., and Cucanoche S.L. 9 This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:04 Sep 02, 2022 Jkt 256001 10 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 11 See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d). 12 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 with sections 751(a) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM 06SEN1 54462 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 6, 2022 / Notices Dated: August 30, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Non-Selected Company Rate V. Subsidies Valuation Information VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available VII. Analysis of Programs VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–19198 Filed 9–2–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–074] Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet), from the People’s Republic of China (China) during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. DATES: Applicable September 6, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Natasia Harrison or Harrison Tanchuck, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1240 or (202) 482–7421, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: Background Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review in the Federal Register on March 4, 2022, and we invited comments from interested parties.1 On April 8, 2022, we received timely case briefs from the following interested parties: Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu 1 See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020, 87 FR 12429 (March 4, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:04 Sep 02, 2022 Jkt 256001 Alcha) and its affiliated trading company Alcha International Holdings Limited (Alcha International); 2 Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd. (Yinbang Clad); 3 and the domestic industry.4 Jiangsu Alcha and Alcha International, jointly, and the domestic industry submitted timely filed rebuttal briefs on April 22, 2022.5 On June 24, 2022, Commerce extended the deadline for issuing these final results to 180 days after the publication date of the Preliminary Results, until August 31, 2022.6 2 See Jiangsu Alcha and Alcha International’s Letter, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Case Brief,’’ dated April 8, 2022. The ‘‘Alcha Group’’ companies include Jiangsu Alcha, Alcha International and Jiangsu Alcha’s cross-owned affiliates Baotou Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd. (Baotou Alcha) and Jiangsu Alcha New Energy Materials Co., Ltd. (Alcha Materials). Jiangsu Alcha reported that, in 2018, Jiangsu Alcha changed its name from ‘‘Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd.’’ to ‘‘Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Group Co., Ltd.’’ See Alcha Group’s Letter, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Alcha Group’s Initial Questionnaire Response,’’ dated July 8, 2021, at 4. See also Alcha Group’s Letter, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Alcha Group’s Sixth Supplemental Questionnaire Response,’’ dated March 23, 2022 (Alcha Group 6SQR), at 1–4. After the Preliminary Results, the Alcha Group explained the spelling inconsistencies in Jiangsu Alcha and Baotou Alcha’s company names throughout the record. For example, the narrative portions of Alcha Group responses and corresponding English translations of Chinese-language exhibits referred to Jiangsu Alcha as ‘‘Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd.’’ and ‘‘Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Group Co., Ltd.’’ interchangeably. These responses also referred to Baotou Alcha as ‘‘Baotou Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd.’’ and ‘‘Baotou Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd.’’ interchangeably. According to Alcha Group 6SQR, the official English company names are Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Group Co., Ltd., Alcha International Holdings Limited, Baotou Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Alcha New Energy Materials Co., Ltd. 3 See Yinbang Clad’s Letter, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Yinbang’s Case Brief,’’ dated April 8, 2022. 4 See Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Domestic Industry’s Case Brief,’’ dated April 8, 2022. The domestic industry includes the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group and its individual members (collectively, the domestic industry). The individual members of the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group are: Arconic Corporation; Commonwealth Rolled Products, Inc.; Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC; Jupiter Aluminum Corporation; JW Aluminum Company; and Novelis Corporation. 5 See Jiangsu Alcha and Alcha International’s Letter, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated April 22, 2022; see also the Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Domestic Industry’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated April 22, 2022. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020,’’ dated June 24, 2022. PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Scope of the Order The product covered by the Order is aluminum sheet from China. A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.7 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in interested parties’ briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum accompanying this notice. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is provided in Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on comments in case and rebuttal briefs and record evidence, Commerce made certain changes with respect to the methodology used in the Preliminary Results to calculate Alcha Group’s program rate for the Government Provision of Primary Aluminum for Less than Adequate Remuneration program. We made no changes for Yinbang Clad. These changes are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each subsidy program found to be countervailable, Commerce finds that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that confers benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.8 For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, including our reliance, in part on adverse facts available (AFA) pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China; 2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 8 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM 06SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54460-54462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-469-818]


Ripe Olives From Spain: Preliminary Results of Countervailing 
Duty Administrative Review; 2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to 
producers/exporters of ripe olives from Spain during the period of 
review, January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Interested parties 
are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable September 6, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg or Theodore Pearson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1785 or (202) 
482-2631, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On August 1, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register the 
countervailing duty (CVD) order on ripe olives from Spain.\1\ On 
October 7, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of an 
administrative review of the Order.\2\ On March 29, 2022, Commerce 
extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this review by 120 
days until August 31, 2022.\3\ For a complete description of the events 
that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.\4\ A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is included as the appendix to this notice. The 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Amended Final Affirmative 
Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 83 
FR 37469 (August 1, 2018) (Order).
    \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 55811 (October 7, 2021).
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Extension of 
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2020,'' dated March 29, 2022.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results of the 2020 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of 
Ripe Olives from Spain,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby 
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the Order are ripe olives from Spain. For a 
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance 
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act). For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, 
Commerce preliminarily determines that there is a subsidy (i.e., a 
financial contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit 
to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific).\6\ For a full 
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, including 
our reliance, in part, on facts otherwise available pursuant to section 
776(a) of the Act, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 54461]]

Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review

    There are three companies for which a review was requested and not 
rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents or 
found to be cross-owned with a mandatory respondent. For these 
companies, because the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents, 
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla) and Angel Camacho 
Alimentaci[oacute]n, S.L. (Camacho), were above de minimis and not 
based entirely on facts available, we are applying to the non-selected 
companies the weighted average of the net subsidy rates calculated for 
Agro Sevilla and Camacho, which we calculated using the publicly-ranged 
sales data submitted by Agro Sevilla and Camacho.\7\ This methodology 
to establish the all-others subsidy rate is consistent with our 
practice and section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act which governs the 
calculation of the all-others rate in an investigation. For further 
information on the calculation of the non-selected respondent rate, see 
the section in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum entitled ``Non-
Selected Company Rate.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally 
calculates (A) a weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates 
calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the 
estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined respondents; and 
(C) a weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for 
the examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. 
sale values for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then 
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as 
the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. 
See, e.g., Ripe Olives from Spain: Final Results of Countervailing 
Duty Administrative Review; 2019, 48 FR 13970 (March 11, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    We preliminarily find the following net countervailable subsidy 
rates exist for the period January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 
Commerce found the following companies to be cross-owned with Angel 
Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n, S.L.: Grupo Angel Camacho, S.L., 
Cuarterola S.L., and Cucanoche S.L.
    \9\ This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that 
were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, 
de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 
705(c)(5)(A) of the Act.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Subsidy rate
                    Producer/exporter                       (percent ad
                                                             valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.Coop. And......................            8.32
Angel Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n, S.L. and its cross-              4.58
 owned affiliates \8\...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies \9\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aceitunas Guadalquivir, S.L.............................            6.68
Alimentary Group Dcoop S. Coop. And.....................            6.68
Aceitunas Torrent, S.L..................................            6.68
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to 
verify the information relied upon in its final results of review.

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We will disclose to parties in this review the calculations 
performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice.\10\ A timeline for the submission of case 
and rebuttal briefs and written comments will be provided to interested 
parties at a later date.\11\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 
review are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of 
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of 
authorities. All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. Note 
that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for 
serving documents containing business proprietary information, until 
further notice.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d).
    \12\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements 
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 
10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS by 5 p.m. eastern time within 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice. Requests should contain the party's name, 
address, and telephone number, the number of participants, whether any 
participant is a foreign national, and a list of the issues to be 
discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to issues 
raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will 
be notified of the date and time for the hearing to be determined.
    Unless extended, we intend to issue the final results of this 
administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis 
of the issues raised in the case briefs, no later than 120 days of 
publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, 
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).

Assessment Rates

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily 
determined subsidy rates in the amounts shown above for the producer/
exporters shown above. Upon completion of the administrative review, 
consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), 
Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, CVDs on all appropriate 
entries covered by this review. We intend to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of 
publication of the final results of this review in the Federal 
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to 
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request 
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce also 
intends upon publication of the final results, to instruct CBP to 
collect cash deposits of estimated CVDs in the amounts calculated in 
the final results of this review for the respective companies listed 
above with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of 
publication of the final results of this review. If the rate calculated 
in the final results is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be 
required on shipments of the subject merchandise entered or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of 
the final results of this review.
    For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue to collect cash 
deposits of estimated CVDs at the all-others rate or the most recent 
company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These 
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.

Notification to Interested Parties

    These preliminary results and notice are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(a) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(4).


[[Page 54462]]


    Dated: August 30, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Non-Selected Company Rate
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2022-19198 Filed 9-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.