Certain Solar Power Optimizers, Inverters, and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation, 54262-54263 [2022-18971]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
54262
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Notices
The Commission received no postRecommended Determination
submissions on the public interest.
On May 13, 2022, NOCO filed a
petition with respect to the ’024 patent,
seeking review of certain of the Final
ID’s findings on the technical prong of
the domestic industry requirement and
infringement and seeking contingent
review of certain of the Final ID’s
findings on invalidity. That same day,
Boltpower filed a petition seeking
review of certain of the ALJ’s and ID’s
findings on claim construction and
infringement with respect to the ’024
patent. Also on May 13, 2022, the Carku
and Winplus respondents filed a joint
contingent petition with respect to the
’024 patent, seeking review of the Final
ID on numerous issues related to
infringement, invalidity, the technical
prong of the domestic industry
requirement, and the economic prong of
the domestic industry requirement. No
petitions were filed concerning the
Final ID’s findings with respect to the
asserted trademarks. On May 23, 2022,
the parties and OUII filed responses to
each other’s petitions.
On June 30, 2022, the Commission
determined not to review the Final ID’s
findings of a violation of section 337
with respect to the ’656 mark and the
’749 mark by defaulting respondent
Zhejiang Quingyou and with respect to
the ’749 mark by defaulting respondent
Mediatek. The Commission presumes
that the allegations in the second
amended complaint against Zhejiang
Quingyou and Mediatek are true with
respect to the ’656 and ’749 marks based
on those respondents’ defaults. 19
U.S.C. 1337(g)(1). The Commission also
determined to review in part the Final
ID’s finding of no violation of section
337 with respect to the ’024 patent and,
on review, to affirm the Final ID’s
finding of no violation due to NOCO’s
failure to satisfy the technical prong of
the domestic industry requirement. The
Commission determined to take no
position on the remainder of Final ID’s
findings under review. Beloit Corp. v.
Valmet Oy, 742 F.2d 1421, 1423 (Fed.
Cir. 1984). The Commission’s notice
requested that the parties, interested
government agencies, and the public
provide written submissions on remedy,
bonding, and the public interest with
respect to defaulting respondents
Zhejiang Quingyou and Mediatek.
Having examined the parties’
submissions concerning remedy, the
public interest, and bonding, the
Commission has determined, pursuant
to subsection 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C.
1337(g)(1)), that the appropriate form of
relief in this investigation is a limited
exclusion order (‘‘LEO’’) with respect to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
Zhejiang Quingyou prohibiting the
importation of certain portable battery
jump starters and components thereof
that infringe the ’656 or ’749 marks and
with respect to Mediatek prohibiting the
importation of certain portable battery
jump starters and components thereof
that infringe the ’749 mark. Although
NOCO requested the Commission to
issue cease and desist orders (‘‘CDOs’’)
directed to these defaulting
respondents, the Commission has
determined not to issue CDOs because
of the lack of evidence or allegations
that Zhejiang Quingyou or Mediatek
maintain commercially significant
inventory and/or engage in significant
commercial operations the United
States. The Commission has further
determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in subsection
337(g)(1) do not preclude the issuance
of the limited exclusion order.
Commissioner Schmidtlein and
Commissioner Karpel agree that
subsection 337(g)(1) is the appropriate
authority for issuance of relief in this
case, but they disagree with the
determination not to issue the CDOs
requested by NOCO. Specifically,
Commissioners Schmidtlein and Karpel
support issuance of both the requested
LEO and the requested CDOs against
defaulting respondents Zhejiang
Quingyou and Mediatek because the
criteria for issuance of such relief under
subsection 337(g)(1)(A)–(E) are met as to
these respondents. (19 U.S.C.
1337(g)(1)(A)–(E); see Order No. 23 at 2
(July 13, 2021); Notice of a Commission
Determination Not to Review an Initial
Determination Finding Ten
Respondents in Default (July 30, 2021)).
Here, in addition to an exclusion order,
NOCO has requested CDOs as to these
two defaulting respondents both in its
post-hearing briefing before the ALJ and
in its remedy submission before the
Commission. Given that subsections
337(g)(1)(A)–(E) are satisfied, in
Commissioner Schmidtlein’s and
Commissioner Karpel’s view, the statute
directs the Commission to issue the
requested CDOs, subject to
consideration of the public interest.
Commissioners Schmidtlein and Karpel
further find that the public interest
factors enumerated in subsection
337(g)(1) do not preclude the issuance
of the CDOs directed to defaulting
respondents Zhejiang Quingyou and
Mediatek. Accordingly, Commissioners
Schmidtlein and Karpel support
issuance of the CDOs, in addition to the
issuance of the LEO discussed above,
under subsection 337(g)(1).
Finally, the Commission has
determined that the bond for
importation during the period of
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Presidential review shall be in the
amount of one hundred percent (100%)
of the entered value of such articles.
The Commission’s notice and order
were delivered to the President and to
the United States Trade Representative
on the day of their issuance. The
Commission has also notified the
Secretary of the Treasury and Customs
and Border Protection of the order. The
investigation is hereby terminated.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 29, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–18998 Filed 9–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1327]
Certain Solar Power Optimizers,
Inverters, and Components Thereof;
Notice of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on July
28, 2022, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of
Ampt, LLC of Fort Collins, Colorado.
The complaint was supplemented by
letters on August 4, 11, and 15, 2022.
The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain solar power
optimizers, inverters, and components
thereof by reason of the infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
9,673,630 (‘‘the ’630 patent’’) and U.S.
Patent 11,289,917 (‘‘the ’917 patent’’).
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists and/
or is in the process of being established
as required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Notices
The complaint (and
supplements to the complaint), except
for any confidential information
contained therein, may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Mullan, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2021). Scope
of Investigation: Having considered the
complaint, the U.S. International Trade
Commission, on August 29, 2022,
ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
3–5, 7–10, and 17 of the ’630 patent and
one or more of claims 1–3, 9, 10, and 12
of the ’917 patent, whether an industry
in the United States exists and/or is in
the process of being established as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘power optimizers for
solar power systems that contain DC–DC
converters, and inverters for solar power
systems’’;
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
54263
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
(a) The complainant is:
Ampt, LLC, 4850 Innovation Drive, Fort
Collins, CO 80525
[Investigation No. 731–TA–718 (Fifth
Review)]
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on glycine from
China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.2
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., 700
Tasman Drive, Milpitas, CA 95035
SolarEdge Technologies, Ltd., 1 HaMada
Street, Postal Code 4673335, Herzliya,
Israel
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as
amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19,
2020), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the
date of service by the complainant of the
complaint and the notice of
investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 29, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–18971 Filed 9–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Glycine From China
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on January 3, 2022 (87 FR 112)
and determined on April 8, 2022 that it
would conduct an expedited review (87
FR 44422, July 26, 2022).
The Commission made this
determination pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determination in
this review on August 30, 2022. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 5347 (August
2022), entitled Glycine from China:
Investigation No. 731–TA–718 (Fifth
Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 30, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–19088 Filed 9–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1105 (Second
Review)]
Lemon Juice From Argentina
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that termination of the
suspended investigation on lemon juice
from Argentina would be likely to lead
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioner Amy A. Karpel not participating.
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54262-54263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18971]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1327]
Certain Solar Power Optimizers, Inverters, and Components
Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on July 28, 2022, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Ampt, LLC of Fort
Collins, Colorado. The complaint was supplemented by letters on August
4, 11, and 15, 2022. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain solar power optimizers, inverters, and
components thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of
U.S. Patent No. 9,673,630 (``the '630 patent'') and U.S. Patent
11,289,917 (``the '917 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists and/or is in the process of being
established as required by the applicable Federal Statute.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
[[Page 54263]]
ADDRESSES: The complaint (and supplements to the complaint), except for
any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For
help accessing EDIS, please email [email protected]. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also
be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Mullan, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-
1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2021). Scope of Investigation:
Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade
Commission, on August 29, 2022, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1, 3-5, 7-10, and 17 of the '630 patent and one or more of
claims 1-3, 9, 10, and 12 of the '917 patent, whether an industry in
the United States exists and/or is in the process of being established
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``power optimizers for
solar power systems that contain DC-DC converters, and inverters for
solar power systems'';
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Ampt, LLC, 4850 Innovation Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., 700 Tasman Drive, Milpitas, CA 95035
SolarEdge Technologies, Ltd., 1 HaMada Street, Postal Code 4673335,
Herzliya, Israel
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as
a party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the
complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation.
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor
is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 29, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-18971 Filed 9-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P