Notice of Debt Cancellation Legal Memorandum, 52943-52945 [2022-18731]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
information collection requirements and
minimize the public’s reporting burden.
It also helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
ICR that is described below. The
Department is especially interested in
public comments addressing the
following issues: (1) is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public record.
Title of Collection: Health Education
Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program Regs.
OMB Control Number: 1845–0125.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals and Households; State,
Local, and Tribal Governments.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 129,945.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 24,120.
Abstract: This is a request for an
extension of OMB approval of
information collection requirements
associated with the Health Education
Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program
regulations for reporting, recordkeeping
and notifications, currently approved
under OMB No. 1845–0125. There has
been no change to the regulatory
language. The previous filing totals were
incorrectly summed and the correct
totals are presented here.
Dated: August 24, 2022.
Kun Mullan,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2022–18591 Filed 8–29–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice Inviting Publishers To Submit
Tests for a Determination of Suitability
for Use in the National Reporting
System for Adult Education
Office of Career, Technical, and
Adult Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Secretary of Education
invites publishers to submit tests for
review and approval for use in the
National Reporting System for Adult
Education (NRS) and announces the
date by which publishers must submit
these tests. This notice relates to the
approved information collection under
OMB control number 1830–0567.
DATES: Deadline for transmittal of
applications: October 1, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your application by
email to NRS@air.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
LeMaster, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 11152, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–7240.
Telephone: (202) 245–6218. Email:
John.LeMaster@ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability and wish to
access telecommunications relay
services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department’s regulations for Measuring
Educational Gain in the National
Reporting System for Adult Education,
34 CFR part 462 (NRS regulations),
include the procedures for determining
the suitability of tests for use in the
NRS.
There is a review process that will
begin on October 1, 2022. Only tests
submitted by the due date will be
reviewed in that review cycle. If a
publisher submits a test after October 1,
2022, the test will not be reviewed until
the review cycle that begins on October
1, 2023.
Criteria the Secretary Uses: In order
for the Secretary to consider a test
suitable for use in the NRS, the test
must meet the criteria and requirements
established in 34 CFR 462.13.
Submission Requirements:
(a) In preparing your application, you
must comply with the requirements in
34 CFR 462.11.
(b) In accordance with 34 CFR 462.10,
the deadline for transmittal of
applications in this fiscal year is
October 1, 2022.
(c) You must retain a copy of your
sent email message and the email
attachments as proof that you submitted
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52943
your application by 11:59 p.m. local
time on October 1, 2022.
(d) We do not consider applications
submitted after the application deadline
date to be timely for the October 1,
2022, review cycle. If an application is
submitted after the October 1, 2022,
deadline date, the application will be
considered timely for the October 1,
2023, deadline date.
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document and an application
package in an accessible format. The
Department will provide the requestor
with an accessible format that may
include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file,
braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3292.
Amy Loyd,
Assistant Secretary for Career, Technical, and
Adult Education.
[FR Doc. 2022–18624 Filed 8–29–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Debt Cancellation Legal
Memorandum
Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department publishes
this memorandum on the Secretary’s
legal authority to cancel student debt on
a categorical basis.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Siegel, U.S. Department of
Education, Office of the General
Counsel, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
52944
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices
room 6E–105, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 987–1508. Email:
brian.siegel@ed.gov.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability and wish to
access telecommunications relay
services, please dial 7–1–1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department publishes this
memorandum on the Secretary’s legal
authority to cancel student debt on a
categorical basis. The debt relief
memorandum is in Appendix A of this
notice.
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed above
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document in an
accessible format. The Department will
provide the requestor with an accessible
format that may include Rich Text
Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a
thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc, or
other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Miguel A. Cardona,
Secretary of Education.
Appendix A—Debt Cancellation Legal
Memorandum
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
TO: Miguel A. Cardona Secretary of
Education
FROM: Lisa Brown General Counsel
DATE: August 23, 2022
SUBJECT: The Secretary’s Legal Authority for
Debt Cancellation
Introduction
For the past year and a half, the Office of
General Counsel (‘‘OGC’’), in consultation
with our colleagues at the Department of
Justice Office of Legal Counsel, has
conducted a review of the Secretary’s legal
authority to cancel student debt on a
categorical basis. This review has included
assessing the analysis outlined in a publicly
disseminated January 2021 memorandum
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
signed by a former Principal Deputy General
Counsel. As detailed below, we have
determined that the Higher Education Relief
Opportunities for Students (‘‘HEROES’’) Act
of 2003 grants the Secretary authority that
could be used to effectuate a program of
targeted loan cancellation directed at
addressing the financial harms of the
COVID–19 pandemic. We have thus
determined that the January 2021
memorandum was substantively incorrect in
its conclusions.
Given the significant public interest in this
issue, and the potential for public confusion
caused by the public availability of the
January 2021 memorandum, I recommend
making this memorandum publicly available
and publishing it in the Federal Register, so
as to provide the general public with notice
of the Department’s interpretation of the
HEROES Act, consistent with statutory
requirements. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a).1
I. The Secretary’s HEROES Act Authority
The HEROES Act, first enacted in the wake
of the September 11 attacks, provides the
Secretary broad authority to grant relief from
student loan requirements during specific
periods (a war, other military operation, or
national emergency, such as the present
COVID–19 pandemic) and for specific
purposes (including to address the financial
harms of such a war, other military
operation, or emergency). The Secretary of
Education has used this authority, under
both this and every prior administration
since the Act’s passage, to provide relief to
borrowers in connection with a war, other
military operation, or national emergency,
including the ongoing moratorium on student
loan payments and interest.2
Specifically, the HEROES Act authorizes
the Secretary to ‘‘waive or modify any
statutory or regulatory provision applicable
to the student financial assistance programs’’
if the Secretary ‘‘deems’’ such waivers or
modifications ‘‘necessary to ensure’’ at least
one of several enumerated purposes,
including that borrowers are ‘‘not placed in
1 The Office of Legal Counsel has made its own
analysis of the Secretary’s authority, which will be
published in tandem with this memorandum’s
recommended publication.
2 See Federal Student Aid Programs (Student
Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins
Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan
Program, and Federal-Work Study Programs), 85 FR
79,856, 79,856 (Dec. 11, 2020) (‘‘Secretary [DeVos]
is issuing these waivers and modifications under
the authority of the HEROES Act[.]’’); Federal
Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance General
Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal
Family Education Loan Program, and the Federal
Direct Loan Program), 77 FR 59,311, 59,312 (Sept.
27, 2012) (‘‘In accordance with the HEROES Act,
. . . Secretary [Duncan] is providing the waivers
and modifications of statutory and regulatory
provisions applicable to the student financial
assistance programs[.]’’); Federal Student Aid
Programs (Student Assistance General Provisions,
Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Direct Loan
Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program
and the Federal Pell Grant Program), 68 FR 69,312,
69,312 (Dec. 12, 2003) (‘‘Secretary [Paige] is issuing
these waivers and modifications under the
authority of section 2(a) of the Higher Education
Relief Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act of
2003[.]’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a worse position financially’’ because of a
national emergency. 20 U.S.C. 1098bb(a)(1),
(2)(A).
Several provisions of the HEROES Act
indicate that Congress intended the Act to
confer broad authority under the
circumstances, and for the purposes,
specified by the Act. First, the Act grants
authority ‘‘[n]otwithstanding any other
provision of law, unless enacted with
specific reference to this section.’’ Id.
§ 1098bb(a)(1). Second, the Act authorizes
the Secretary to waive or modify ‘‘any’’
statutory or regulatory provision applicable
to the student financial assistance programs.
Id. § 1098bb(a)(1), (a)(2). Third, the Act
expressly authorizes the Secretary to issue
such waivers and modifications as he ‘‘deems
necessary in connection with a war or other
military operation or national emergency.’’
Id. § 1098bb(a)(1). The Supreme Court has
recognized that, in empowering a federal
official to act as that official ‘‘deems
necessary’’ in circumstances specified by a
statute, Congress has granted the official
broad discretion to take such action.3 This
authority is not, however, boundless: it is
limited, inter alia, to periods of a war, other
military operation, or national emergency (id.
§ 1098bb(a)(1)), to certain categories of
eligible individuals or institutions (id.
§ 1098ee(2)), and to a defined set of purposes
(id. § 1098bb(a)(2)(A)–(E)).
In present circumstances, this authority
could be used to effectuate a program of
categorical debt cancellation directed at
addressing the financial harms caused by the
COVID–19 pandemic. The Secretary could
waive or modify statutory and regulatory
provisions to effectuate a certain amount of
cancellation for borrowers who have been
financially harmed because of the COVID–19
pandemic. The Secretary’s determinations
regarding the amount of relief, and the
categories of borrowers for whom relief is
necessary, should be informed by evidence
regarding the financial harms that borrowers
have experienced, or will likely experience,
because of the COVID–19 pandemic. But the
Secretary’s authority can be exercised
categorically to address the situation at hand;
it does not need to be exercised ‘‘on a caseby-case basis.’’ Id. § 1098bb(b)(3). That is, he
is not required to determine or show that any
individual borrower is entitled to a specific
amount of relief, and he instead may provide
relief on a categorical basis as necessary to
address the financial harms of the pandemic.
II. The January 2021 Memorandum
On January 7, 2021, Secretary DeVos
resigned from her position as Secretary of
Education, effective January 8, 2021. On
January 13, a news outlet published a
memorandum signed January 12 by the thenPrincipal Deputy General Counsel, addressed
to ‘‘Betsy DeVos[,] Secretary of Education.’’ 4
3 Webster v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592, 600 (1988) (statute
authorizing action when an agency head ‘‘shall
deem such [action] necessary or advisable’’ ‘‘fairly
exudes deference’’ to agency head and ‘‘strongly
suggests that its implementation was ‘committed to
agency discretion by law’ ’’ (second emphasis
added) (some quotation marks omitted)).
4 Michael Stratford, Trump Administration Tries
to Hamstring Biden on Student Loan Forgiveness,
Politico (Jan. 13, 2021).
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Two substantively identical versions of that
memorandum were posted to the website of
the Office of Postsecondary Education, dated
January 12 and January 18 (collectively, the
‘‘January 2021 memorandum’’). Having
reviewed the memorandum in consultation
with the Office of Legal Counsel, we have
determined that although it accurately
describes the core features of the HEROES
Act, its ultimate conclusions are unsupported
and incorrect.5 As such, it should be
rescinded.
As an initial matter, the bulk of the January
2021 memorandum’s discussion of HEROES
Act authority describes and quotes the key
provisions of the HEROES Act. The
memorandum explains that the HEROES Act
provides the Secretary ‘‘authority to provide
specified [6] waivers or modifications to Title
IV federal financial student aid program
statutory and regulatory requirements
because of the declared National
Emergency,’’ identifies that declared
emergency as the COVID–19 national
emergency declared on March 18, 2020, and
characterizes this authority as ‘‘narrowly
cabined’’ to achieving five enumerated
purposes, including ‘‘ensur[ing] that . . .
recipients of student financial assistance
under title IV of the Act who are affected
individuals are not placed in a worse
position financially in relation to that
financial assistance because of their status as
affected individuals.’’ Jan. 2021 Mem. at 5–
6.
The memorandum goes on to read in
purported limitations on the scope of relief
that may be afforded that are contrary to the
clear text of the Act. The memorandum
5 In addition to determining that the conclusions
contained in the January 2021 memorandum were
substantively incorrect, we have determined that
the memorandum was issued in contravention of
then-effective Department processes for issuing
significant guidance. An Interim Final Rule issued
by the Department on October 5, 2020, pursuant to
Executive Order 13,891, established additional
procedures for the issuance of guidance documents.
See Rulemaking and Guidance Procedures, 85 FR
62,597 (Oct. 5, 2020); see also Exec. Order No.
13,891, 84 FR 55,235 (Oct. 9, 2019). That rule
established new requirements for the issuance of
guidance and ‘‘significant guidance,’’ defining the
latter term to include guidance documents that
‘‘[r]aise novel, legal, or policy issues arising out of
legal mandates [or] the President’s priorities.’’ 85
FR at 62,608. The public dissemination of the
January 2021 memorandum violated a number of
provisions of this rule, including that guidance
must be ‘‘accessible through the Department’s
guidance portal,’’ and that, barring compelling
cause, all significant guidance may be published
only after a 30-day public comment period and
review by the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 12,866 of September 30,
1993. Id. That rule was rescinded in September
2021, 86 FR 53,863 (Sept. 29, 2021), but it was in
effect at the time of the January 2021
memorandum’s publication. Thus, OGC has
determined that the January 2021 memorandum
was not properly promulgated.
6 We read the term ‘‘specified’’ as acknowledging
statutory limits on HEROES Act authority,
including the enumerated purposes of 20 U.S.C.
1098bb(b)(1), and not as suggesting any atextual
limitations on the Act’s clear grant of authority to
waive or modify ‘‘any’’ statutory or regulatory
provision applicable to student aid programs,
provided other HEROES Act requirements are met.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
advances three primary arguments in support
of a conclusion that ‘‘Congress never
intended the HEROES Act as authority for
mass cancellation, compromise, discharge, or
forgiveness of student loan principal
balances, and/or to materially modify
repayment amounts or terms.’’ Jan. 2021
Mem. at 6.
First, the memorandum recites certain
statutory limits on the Secretary’s authority,
including the HEROES Act’s statutory
definition of individuals eligible for relief, 20
U.S.C. 1098ee(2), and the enumerated
purposes for which waivers or modifications
may be issued, id. § 1098bb(a)(2).
The memorandum is correct that such
statutory provisions exist but provides no
support for the suggestion that these
provisions impose limitations beyond their
clear terms. See Jan. 2021 Mem. at 6.
Second, the memorandum points to the
HEROES Act’s references to avoiding
‘‘defaults’’ and a ‘‘cross-cite’’ to a separate
provision of the Higher Education Act
relating to the ‘‘return’’ of student loan funds,
concluding that these provisions ‘‘provide a
strong textual basis for concluding Congress
intended loans to be repaid.’’ Id. But these
provisions—which identify as allowable
purposes issuing waivers or modifications to
avoid defaults and granting relief from
certain requirements that borrowers return
certain payments—in no way impose a
requirement that any exercise of HEROES Act
authority must ensure that every borrower is
left with a remaining balance on their loan.
The reference to ‘‘defaults’’ authorizes the
Secretary to ‘‘avoid’’ defaults; it does not
require that he preserve their possibility. And
the Higher Education Act provisions
regarding the ‘‘return’’ of overpayments relate
only to specific processes and calculations
under which students are required to return
grant and loan assistance if they withdraw
from their school, see 20 U.S.C. 1091b; there
is no conceivable reading of this provision
that reflects a congressional intent that all
borrowers, including those not covered by
the section 1091b overpayment provisions,
are required to repay their loans in full.
Third, the memorandum concludes that
the authority to ‘‘waive or modify any
statutory or regulatory provision’’ is limited
to the definition of ‘‘modify’’ that was
adopted for an unrelated telecommunications
statute, and ‘‘does not authorize major
changes.’’ Jan. 2021 Mem. at 6. The
memorandum draws its definition of modify
from MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am.
Telephone & Telegraph Co., 512 U.S. 218,
225 (1994). In that case, the statutory
provisions under review applied no clear
limiting principle to a grant of modification
authority to the FCC; the statute allowed
modifications ‘‘in [the FCC’s] discretion and
for good cause shown.’’ Id. at 224 (quoting 47
U.S.C. 203 (1988 ed. and Supp. IV)). Here,
the HEROES Act itself clearly speaks to the
scope of modification authority: the Secretary
may make those modifications as may be
‘‘necessary to ensure’’ specific enumerated
purposes. 20 U.S.C. 1098bb. The Secretary
may not make modifications going beyond
that limit, but nor is he restricted to a degree
of modifications that would fall short of
‘‘ensur[ing]’’ the enumerated purposes are
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52945
achieved. Moreover, the HEROES Act
broadly authorizes the Secretary to act as he
‘‘deems necessary’’ to ‘‘waive or modify’’ any
statutory or regulatory provision applicable
to the student aid program. The January 2021
memorandum’s interpretation of ‘‘modify’’
would read the Act to authorize the Secretary
to waive entirely or to make non-major
changes in the relevant statutory or
regulatory provisions, but not authorize the
Secretary to do anything in between. That
interpretation is illogical, and nothing in the
HEROES Act’s broad grant of authority
supports such a reading.
We have discussed these and other aspects
of the January 2021 memorandum with the
Office of Legal Counsel, and we further find
persuasive the discussion of the January 2021
memorandum offered in the Office of Legal
Counsel’s memorandum, which will be
published in tandem with this
memorandum’s recommended publication.
Conclusion
For the reasons detailed above, I
recommend that you (1) determine that the
January 2021 memorandum is formally
rescinded as substantively incorrect and (2)
authorize publication in the Federal Register
and public posting of this memorandum as
the Department’s interpretation of the
HEROES Act.
[FR Doc. 2022–18731 Filed 8–29–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Agency Information
Collection
Bonneville Power
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Submission for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) review;
comment request.
AGENCY:
The Department of Energy
(DOE), Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA), invites public
comment on a collection of information
that BPA is developing for submission
to OMB pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
collection, Contractor Safety, will be
used to manage portions of the Safety
program that are related to contractors.
These collection instruments allow for
compliance with Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA)
requirements.
DATES: Comments regarding this
proposed information collection must
be received on or before October 31,
2022. If you anticipate any difficulty in
submitting comments within that
period, contact the person listed in the
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section as soon as possible.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52943-52945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18731]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Debt Cancellation Legal Memorandum
AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department publishes this memorandum on the Secretary's
legal authority to cancel student debt on a categorical basis.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Siegel, U.S. Department of
Education, Office of the General Counsel, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
[[Page 52944]]
room 6E-105, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 987-1508. Email:
[email protected].
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department publishes this memorandum on
the Secretary's legal authority to cancel student debt on a categorical
basis. The debt relief memorandum is in Appendix A of this notice.
Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed
above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format. The
Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive,
an MP3 file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other
accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Miguel A. Cardona,
Secretary of Education.
Appendix A--Debt Cancellation Legal Memorandum
TO: Miguel A. Cardona Secretary of Education
FROM: Lisa Brown General Counsel
DATE: August 23, 2022
SUBJECT: The Secretary's Legal Authority for Debt Cancellation
Introduction
For the past year and a half, the Office of General Counsel
(``OGC''), in consultation with our colleagues at the Department of
Justice Office of Legal Counsel, has conducted a review of the
Secretary's legal authority to cancel student debt on a categorical
basis. This review has included assessing the analysis outlined in a
publicly disseminated January 2021 memorandum signed by a former
Principal Deputy General Counsel. As detailed below, we have
determined that the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for
Students (``HEROES'') Act of 2003 grants the Secretary authority
that could be used to effectuate a program of targeted loan
cancellation directed at addressing the financial harms of the
COVID-19 pandemic. We have thus determined that the January 2021
memorandum was substantively incorrect in its conclusions.
Given the significant public interest in this issue, and the
potential for public confusion caused by the public availability of
the January 2021 memorandum, I recommend making this memorandum
publicly available and publishing it in the Federal Register, so as
to provide the general public with notice of the Department's
interpretation of the HEROES Act, consistent with statutory
requirements. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Office of Legal Counsel has made its own analysis of the
Secretary's authority, which will be published in tandem with this
memorandum's recommended publication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. The Secretary's HEROES Act Authority
The HEROES Act, first enacted in the wake of the September 11
attacks, provides the Secretary broad authority to grant relief from
student loan requirements during specific periods (a war, other
military operation, or national emergency, such as the present
COVID-19 pandemic) and for specific purposes (including to address
the financial harms of such a war, other military operation, or
emergency). The Secretary of Education has used this authority,
under both this and every prior administration since the Act's
passage, to provide relief to borrowers in connection with a war,
other military operation, or national emergency, including the
ongoing moratorium on student loan payments and interest.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Federal Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance General
Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program, and Federal-Work Study Programs), 85 FR 79,856,
79,856 (Dec. 11, 2020) (``Secretary [DeVos] is issuing these waivers
and modifications under the authority of the HEROES Act[.]'');
Federal Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance General Provisions,
Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program,
and the Federal Direct Loan Program), 77 FR 59,311, 59,312 (Sept.
27, 2012) (``In accordance with the HEROES Act, . . . Secretary
[Duncan] is providing the waivers and modifications of statutory and
regulatory provisions applicable to the student financial assistance
programs[.]''); Federal Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance
General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Direct
Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program and the Federal
Pell Grant Program), 68 FR 69,312, 69,312 (Dec. 12, 2003)
(``Secretary [Paige] is issuing these waivers and modifications
under the authority of section 2(a) of the Higher Education Relief
Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act of 2003[.]'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the HEROES Act authorizes the Secretary to ``waive
or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the
student financial assistance programs'' if the Secretary ``deems''
such waivers or modifications ``necessary to ensure'' at least one
of several enumerated purposes, including that borrowers are ``not
placed in a worse position financially'' because of a national
emergency. 20 U.S.C. 1098bb(a)(1), (2)(A).
Several provisions of the HEROES Act indicate that Congress
intended the Act to confer broad authority under the circumstances,
and for the purposes, specified by the Act. First, the Act grants
authority ``[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, unless
enacted with specific reference to this section.'' Id. Sec.
1098bb(a)(1). Second, the Act authorizes the Secretary to waive or
modify ``any'' statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the
student financial assistance programs. Id. Sec. 1098bb(a)(1),
(a)(2). Third, the Act expressly authorizes the Secretary to issue
such waivers and modifications as he ``deems necessary in connection
with a war or other military operation or national emergency.'' Id.
Sec. 1098bb(a)(1). The Supreme Court has recognized that, in
empowering a federal official to act as that official ``deems
necessary'' in circumstances specified by a statute, Congress has
granted the official broad discretion to take such action.\3\ This
authority is not, however, boundless: it is limited, inter alia, to
periods of a war, other military operation, or national emergency
(id. Sec. 1098bb(a)(1)), to certain categories of eligible
individuals or institutions (id. Sec. 1098ee(2)), and to a defined
set of purposes (id. Sec. 1098bb(a)(2)(A)-(E)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Webster v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592, 600 (1988) (statute
authorizing action when an agency head ``shall deem such [action]
necessary or advisable'' ``fairly exudes deference'' to agency head
and ``strongly suggests that its implementation was `committed to
agency discretion by law' '' (second emphasis added) (some quotation
marks omitted)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In present circumstances, this authority could be used to
effectuate a program of categorical debt cancellation directed at
addressing the financial harms caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The
Secretary could waive or modify statutory and regulatory provisions
to effectuate a certain amount of cancellation for borrowers who
have been financially harmed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The
Secretary's determinations regarding the amount of relief, and the
categories of borrowers for whom relief is necessary, should be
informed by evidence regarding the financial harms that borrowers
have experienced, or will likely experience, because of the COVID-19
pandemic. But the Secretary's authority can be exercised
categorically to address the situation at hand; it does not need to
be exercised ``on a case-by-case basis.'' Id. Sec. 1098bb(b)(3).
That is, he is not required to determine or show that any individual
borrower is entitled to a specific amount of relief, and he instead
may provide relief on a categorical basis as necessary to address
the financial harms of the pandemic.
II. The January 2021 Memorandum
On January 7, 2021, Secretary DeVos resigned from her position
as Secretary of Education, effective January 8, 2021. On January 13,
a news outlet published a memorandum signed January 12 by the then-
Principal Deputy General Counsel, addressed to ``Betsy DeVos[,]
Secretary of Education.'' \4\
[[Page 52945]]
Two substantively identical versions of that memorandum were posted
to the website of the Office of Postsecondary Education, dated
January 12 and January 18 (collectively, the ``January 2021
memorandum''). Having reviewed the memorandum in consultation with
the Office of Legal Counsel, we have determined that although it
accurately describes the core features of the HEROES Act, its
ultimate conclusions are unsupported and incorrect.\5\ As such, it
should be rescinded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Michael Stratford, Trump Administration Tries to Hamstring
Biden on Student Loan Forgiveness, Politico (Jan. 13, 2021).
\5\ In addition to determining that the conclusions contained in
the January 2021 memorandum were substantively incorrect, we have
determined that the memorandum was issued in contravention of then-
effective Department processes for issuing significant guidance. An
Interim Final Rule issued by the Department on October 5, 2020,
pursuant to Executive Order 13,891, established additional
procedures for the issuance of guidance documents. See Rulemaking
and Guidance Procedures, 85 FR 62,597 (Oct. 5, 2020); see also Exec.
Order No. 13,891, 84 FR 55,235 (Oct. 9, 2019). That rule established
new requirements for the issuance of guidance and ``significant
guidance,'' defining the latter term to include guidance documents
that ``[r]aise novel, legal, or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates [or] the President's priorities.'' 85 FR at 62,608. The
public dissemination of the January 2021 memorandum violated a
number of provisions of this rule, including that guidance must be
``accessible through the Department's guidance portal,'' and that,
barring compelling cause, all significant guidance may be published
only after a 30-day public comment period and review by the Office
of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12,866 of September
30, 1993. Id. That rule was rescinded in September 2021, 86 FR
53,863 (Sept. 29, 2021), but it was in effect at the time of the
January 2021 memorandum's publication. Thus, OGC has determined that
the January 2021 memorandum was not properly promulgated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As an initial matter, the bulk of the January 2021 memorandum's
discussion of HEROES Act authority describes and quotes the key
provisions of the HEROES Act. The memorandum explains that the
HEROES Act provides the Secretary ``authority to provide specified
[\6\] waivers or modifications to Title IV federal financial student
aid program statutory and regulatory requirements because of the
declared National Emergency,'' identifies that declared emergency as
the COVID-19 national emergency declared on March 18, 2020, and
characterizes this authority as ``narrowly cabined'' to achieving
five enumerated purposes, including ``ensur[ing] that . . .
recipients of student financial assistance under title IV of the Act
who are affected individuals are not placed in a worse position
financially in relation to that financial assistance because of
their status as affected individuals.'' Jan. 2021 Mem. at 5-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ We read the term ``specified'' as acknowledging statutory
limits on HEROES Act authority, including the enumerated purposes of
20 U.S.C. 1098bb(b)(1), and not as suggesting any atextual
limitations on the Act's clear grant of authority to waive or modify
``any'' statutory or regulatory provision applicable to student aid
programs, provided other HEROES Act requirements are met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The memorandum goes on to read in purported limitations on the
scope of relief that may be afforded that are contrary to the clear
text of the Act. The memorandum advances three primary arguments in
support of a conclusion that ``Congress never intended the HEROES
Act as authority for mass cancellation, compromise, discharge, or
forgiveness of student loan principal balances, and/or to materially
modify repayment amounts or terms.'' Jan. 2021 Mem. at 6.
First, the memorandum recites certain statutory limits on the
Secretary's authority, including the HEROES Act's statutory
definition of individuals eligible for relief, 20 U.S.C. 1098ee(2),
and the enumerated purposes for which waivers or modifications may
be issued, id. Sec. 1098bb(a)(2).
The memorandum is correct that such statutory provisions exist
but provides no support for the suggestion that these provisions
impose limitations beyond their clear terms. See Jan. 2021 Mem. at
6.
Second, the memorandum points to the HEROES Act's references to
avoiding ``defaults'' and a ``cross-cite'' to a separate provision
of the Higher Education Act relating to the ``return'' of student
loan funds, concluding that these provisions ``provide a strong
textual basis for concluding Congress intended loans to be repaid.''
Id. But these provisions--which identify as allowable purposes
issuing waivers or modifications to avoid defaults and granting
relief from certain requirements that borrowers return certain
payments--in no way impose a requirement that any exercise of HEROES
Act authority must ensure that every borrower is left with a
remaining balance on their loan. The reference to ``defaults''
authorizes the Secretary to ``avoid'' defaults; it does not require
that he preserve their possibility. And the Higher Education Act
provisions regarding the ``return'' of overpayments relate only to
specific processes and calculations under which students are
required to return grant and loan assistance if they withdraw from
their school, see 20 U.S.C. 1091b; there is no conceivable reading
of this provision that reflects a congressional intent that all
borrowers, including those not covered by the section 1091b
overpayment provisions, are required to repay their loans in full.
Third, the memorandum concludes that the authority to ``waive or
modify any statutory or regulatory provision'' is limited to the
definition of ``modify'' that was adopted for an unrelated
telecommunications statute, and ``does not authorize major
changes.'' Jan. 2021 Mem. at 6. The memorandum draws its definition
of modify from MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Telephone & Telegraph
Co., 512 U.S. 218, 225 (1994). In that case, the statutory
provisions under review applied no clear limiting principle to a
grant of modification authority to the FCC; the statute allowed
modifications ``in [the FCC's] discretion and for good cause
shown.'' Id. at 224 (quoting 47 U.S.C. 203 (1988 ed. and Supp. IV)).
Here, the HEROES Act itself clearly speaks to the scope of
modification authority: the Secretary may make those modifications
as may be ``necessary to ensure'' specific enumerated purposes. 20
U.S.C. 1098bb. The Secretary may not make modifications going beyond
that limit, but nor is he restricted to a degree of modifications
that would fall short of ``ensur[ing]'' the enumerated purposes are
achieved. Moreover, the HEROES Act broadly authorizes the Secretary
to act as he ``deems necessary'' to ``waive or modify'' any
statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student aid
program. The January 2021 memorandum's interpretation of ``modify''
would read the Act to authorize the Secretary to waive entirely or
to make non-major changes in the relevant statutory or regulatory
provisions, but not authorize the Secretary to do anything in
between. That interpretation is illogical, and nothing in the HEROES
Act's broad grant of authority supports such a reading.
We have discussed these and other aspects of the January 2021
memorandum with the Office of Legal Counsel, and we further find
persuasive the discussion of the January 2021 memorandum offered in
the Office of Legal Counsel's memorandum, which will be published in
tandem with this memorandum's recommended publication.
Conclusion
For the reasons detailed above, I recommend that you (1)
determine that the January 2021 memorandum is formally rescinded as
substantively incorrect and (2) authorize publication in the Federal
Register and public posting of this memorandum as the Department's
interpretation of the HEROES Act.
[FR Doc. 2022-18731 Filed 8-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P