Notice of Debt Cancellation Legal Memorandum, 52943-52945 [2022-18731]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. It also helps the public understand the Department’s information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format. ED is soliciting comments on the proposed ICR that is described below. The Department is especially interested in public comments addressing the following issues: (1) is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public record. Title of Collection: Health Education Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program Regs. OMB Control Number: 1845–0125. Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved collection. Respondents/Affected Public: Individuals and Households; State, Local, and Tribal Governments. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 129,945. Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 24,120. Abstract: This is a request for an extension of OMB approval of information collection requirements associated with the Health Education Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program regulations for reporting, recordkeeping and notifications, currently approved under OMB No. 1845–0125. There has been no change to the regulatory language. The previous filing totals were incorrectly summed and the correct totals are presented here. Dated: August 24, 2022. Kun Mullan, PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and Clearance Governance and Strategy Division, Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. [FR Doc. 2022–18591 Filed 8–29–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Aug 29, 2022 Jkt 256001 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Notice Inviting Publishers To Submit Tests for a Determination of Suitability for Use in the National Reporting System for Adult Education Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Secretary of Education invites publishers to submit tests for review and approval for use in the National Reporting System for Adult Education (NRS) and announces the date by which publishers must submit these tests. This notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control number 1830–0567. DATES: Deadline for transmittal of applications: October 1, 2022. ADDRESSES: Submit your application by email to NRS@air.org. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John LeMaster, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 11152, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–7240. Telephone: (202) 245–6218. Email: John.LeMaster@ed.gov. If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7–1–1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department’s regulations for Measuring Educational Gain in the National Reporting System for Adult Education, 34 CFR part 462 (NRS regulations), include the procedures for determining the suitability of tests for use in the NRS. There is a review process that will begin on October 1, 2022. Only tests submitted by the due date will be reviewed in that review cycle. If a publisher submits a test after October 1, 2022, the test will not be reviewed until the review cycle that begins on October 1, 2023. Criteria the Secretary Uses: In order for the Secretary to consider a test suitable for use in the NRS, the test must meet the criteria and requirements established in 34 CFR 462.13. Submission Requirements: (a) In preparing your application, you must comply with the requirements in 34 CFR 462.11. (b) In accordance with 34 CFR 462.10, the deadline for transmittal of applications in this fiscal year is October 1, 2022. (c) You must retain a copy of your sent email message and the email attachments as proof that you submitted SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52943 your application by 11:59 p.m. local time on October 1, 2022. (d) We do not consider applications submitted after the application deadline date to be timely for the October 1, 2022, review cycle. If an application is submitted after the October 1, 2022, deadline date, the application will be considered timely for the October 1, 2023, deadline date. Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and an application package in an accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc or other accessible format. Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3292. Amy Loyd, Assistant Secretary for Career, Technical, and Adult Education. [FR Doc. 2022–18624 Filed 8–29–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Notice of Debt Cancellation Legal Memorandum Office of the General Counsel, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department publishes this memorandum on the Secretary’s legal authority to cancel student debt on a categorical basis. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Siegel, U.S. Department of Education, Office of the General Counsel, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 52944 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices room 6E–105, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 987–1508. Email: brian.siegel@ed.gov. If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7–1–1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department publishes this memorandum on the Secretary’s legal authority to cancel student debt on a categorical basis. The debt relief memorandum is in Appendix A of this notice. Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format. Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. Miguel A. Cardona, Secretary of Education. Appendix A—Debt Cancellation Legal Memorandum khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES TO: Miguel A. Cardona Secretary of Education FROM: Lisa Brown General Counsel DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: The Secretary’s Legal Authority for Debt Cancellation Introduction For the past year and a half, the Office of General Counsel (‘‘OGC’’), in consultation with our colleagues at the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, has conducted a review of the Secretary’s legal authority to cancel student debt on a categorical basis. This review has included assessing the analysis outlined in a publicly disseminated January 2021 memorandum VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Aug 29, 2022 Jkt 256001 signed by a former Principal Deputy General Counsel. As detailed below, we have determined that the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students (‘‘HEROES’’) Act of 2003 grants the Secretary authority that could be used to effectuate a program of targeted loan cancellation directed at addressing the financial harms of the COVID–19 pandemic. We have thus determined that the January 2021 memorandum was substantively incorrect in its conclusions. Given the significant public interest in this issue, and the potential for public confusion caused by the public availability of the January 2021 memorandum, I recommend making this memorandum publicly available and publishing it in the Federal Register, so as to provide the general public with notice of the Department’s interpretation of the HEROES Act, consistent with statutory requirements. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a).1 I. The Secretary’s HEROES Act Authority The HEROES Act, first enacted in the wake of the September 11 attacks, provides the Secretary broad authority to grant relief from student loan requirements during specific periods (a war, other military operation, or national emergency, such as the present COVID–19 pandemic) and for specific purposes (including to address the financial harms of such a war, other military operation, or emergency). The Secretary of Education has used this authority, under both this and every prior administration since the Act’s passage, to provide relief to borrowers in connection with a war, other military operation, or national emergency, including the ongoing moratorium on student loan payments and interest.2 Specifically, the HEROES Act authorizes the Secretary to ‘‘waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student financial assistance programs’’ if the Secretary ‘‘deems’’ such waivers or modifications ‘‘necessary to ensure’’ at least one of several enumerated purposes, including that borrowers are ‘‘not placed in 1 The Office of Legal Counsel has made its own analysis of the Secretary’s authority, which will be published in tandem with this memorandum’s recommended publication. 2 See Federal Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, and Federal-Work Study Programs), 85 FR 79,856, 79,856 (Dec. 11, 2020) (‘‘Secretary [DeVos] is issuing these waivers and modifications under the authority of the HEROES Act[.]’’); Federal Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, and the Federal Direct Loan Program), 77 FR 59,311, 59,312 (Sept. 27, 2012) (‘‘In accordance with the HEROES Act, . . . Secretary [Duncan] is providing the waivers and modifications of statutory and regulatory provisions applicable to the student financial assistance programs[.]’’); Federal Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Direct Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program and the Federal Pell Grant Program), 68 FR 69,312, 69,312 (Dec. 12, 2003) (‘‘Secretary [Paige] is issuing these waivers and modifications under the authority of section 2(a) of the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act of 2003[.]’’). PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 a worse position financially’’ because of a national emergency. 20 U.S.C. 1098bb(a)(1), (2)(A). Several provisions of the HEROES Act indicate that Congress intended the Act to confer broad authority under the circumstances, and for the purposes, specified by the Act. First, the Act grants authority ‘‘[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, unless enacted with specific reference to this section.’’ Id. § 1098bb(a)(1). Second, the Act authorizes the Secretary to waive or modify ‘‘any’’ statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student financial assistance programs. Id. § 1098bb(a)(1), (a)(2). Third, the Act expressly authorizes the Secretary to issue such waivers and modifications as he ‘‘deems necessary in connection with a war or other military operation or national emergency.’’ Id. § 1098bb(a)(1). The Supreme Court has recognized that, in empowering a federal official to act as that official ‘‘deems necessary’’ in circumstances specified by a statute, Congress has granted the official broad discretion to take such action.3 This authority is not, however, boundless: it is limited, inter alia, to periods of a war, other military operation, or national emergency (id. § 1098bb(a)(1)), to certain categories of eligible individuals or institutions (id. § 1098ee(2)), and to a defined set of purposes (id. § 1098bb(a)(2)(A)–(E)). In present circumstances, this authority could be used to effectuate a program of categorical debt cancellation directed at addressing the financial harms caused by the COVID–19 pandemic. The Secretary could waive or modify statutory and regulatory provisions to effectuate a certain amount of cancellation for borrowers who have been financially harmed because of the COVID–19 pandemic. The Secretary’s determinations regarding the amount of relief, and the categories of borrowers for whom relief is necessary, should be informed by evidence regarding the financial harms that borrowers have experienced, or will likely experience, because of the COVID–19 pandemic. But the Secretary’s authority can be exercised categorically to address the situation at hand; it does not need to be exercised ‘‘on a caseby-case basis.’’ Id. § 1098bb(b)(3). That is, he is not required to determine or show that any individual borrower is entitled to a specific amount of relief, and he instead may provide relief on a categorical basis as necessary to address the financial harms of the pandemic. II. The January 2021 Memorandum On January 7, 2021, Secretary DeVos resigned from her position as Secretary of Education, effective January 8, 2021. On January 13, a news outlet published a memorandum signed January 12 by the thenPrincipal Deputy General Counsel, addressed to ‘‘Betsy DeVos[,] Secretary of Education.’’ 4 3 Webster v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592, 600 (1988) (statute authorizing action when an agency head ‘‘shall deem such [action] necessary or advisable’’ ‘‘fairly exudes deference’’ to agency head and ‘‘strongly suggests that its implementation was ‘committed to agency discretion by law’ ’’ (second emphasis added) (some quotation marks omitted)). 4 Michael Stratford, Trump Administration Tries to Hamstring Biden on Student Loan Forgiveness, Politico (Jan. 13, 2021). E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Two substantively identical versions of that memorandum were posted to the website of the Office of Postsecondary Education, dated January 12 and January 18 (collectively, the ‘‘January 2021 memorandum’’). Having reviewed the memorandum in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel, we have determined that although it accurately describes the core features of the HEROES Act, its ultimate conclusions are unsupported and incorrect.5 As such, it should be rescinded. As an initial matter, the bulk of the January 2021 memorandum’s discussion of HEROES Act authority describes and quotes the key provisions of the HEROES Act. The memorandum explains that the HEROES Act provides the Secretary ‘‘authority to provide specified [6] waivers or modifications to Title IV federal financial student aid program statutory and regulatory requirements because of the declared National Emergency,’’ identifies that declared emergency as the COVID–19 national emergency declared on March 18, 2020, and characterizes this authority as ‘‘narrowly cabined’’ to achieving five enumerated purposes, including ‘‘ensur[ing] that . . . recipients of student financial assistance under title IV of the Act who are affected individuals are not placed in a worse position financially in relation to that financial assistance because of their status as affected individuals.’’ Jan. 2021 Mem. at 5– 6. The memorandum goes on to read in purported limitations on the scope of relief that may be afforded that are contrary to the clear text of the Act. The memorandum 5 In addition to determining that the conclusions contained in the January 2021 memorandum were substantively incorrect, we have determined that the memorandum was issued in contravention of then-effective Department processes for issuing significant guidance. An Interim Final Rule issued by the Department on October 5, 2020, pursuant to Executive Order 13,891, established additional procedures for the issuance of guidance documents. See Rulemaking and Guidance Procedures, 85 FR 62,597 (Oct. 5, 2020); see also Exec. Order No. 13,891, 84 FR 55,235 (Oct. 9, 2019). That rule established new requirements for the issuance of guidance and ‘‘significant guidance,’’ defining the latter term to include guidance documents that ‘‘[r]aise novel, legal, or policy issues arising out of legal mandates [or] the President’s priorities.’’ 85 FR at 62,608. The public dissemination of the January 2021 memorandum violated a number of provisions of this rule, including that guidance must be ‘‘accessible through the Department’s guidance portal,’’ and that, barring compelling cause, all significant guidance may be published only after a 30-day public comment period and review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12,866 of September 30, 1993. Id. That rule was rescinded in September 2021, 86 FR 53,863 (Sept. 29, 2021), but it was in effect at the time of the January 2021 memorandum’s publication. Thus, OGC has determined that the January 2021 memorandum was not properly promulgated. 6 We read the term ‘‘specified’’ as acknowledging statutory limits on HEROES Act authority, including the enumerated purposes of 20 U.S.C. 1098bb(b)(1), and not as suggesting any atextual limitations on the Act’s clear grant of authority to waive or modify ‘‘any’’ statutory or regulatory provision applicable to student aid programs, provided other HEROES Act requirements are met. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Aug 29, 2022 Jkt 256001 advances three primary arguments in support of a conclusion that ‘‘Congress never intended the HEROES Act as authority for mass cancellation, compromise, discharge, or forgiveness of student loan principal balances, and/or to materially modify repayment amounts or terms.’’ Jan. 2021 Mem. at 6. First, the memorandum recites certain statutory limits on the Secretary’s authority, including the HEROES Act’s statutory definition of individuals eligible for relief, 20 U.S.C. 1098ee(2), and the enumerated purposes for which waivers or modifications may be issued, id. § 1098bb(a)(2). The memorandum is correct that such statutory provisions exist but provides no support for the suggestion that these provisions impose limitations beyond their clear terms. See Jan. 2021 Mem. at 6. Second, the memorandum points to the HEROES Act’s references to avoiding ‘‘defaults’’ and a ‘‘cross-cite’’ to a separate provision of the Higher Education Act relating to the ‘‘return’’ of student loan funds, concluding that these provisions ‘‘provide a strong textual basis for concluding Congress intended loans to be repaid.’’ Id. But these provisions—which identify as allowable purposes issuing waivers or modifications to avoid defaults and granting relief from certain requirements that borrowers return certain payments—in no way impose a requirement that any exercise of HEROES Act authority must ensure that every borrower is left with a remaining balance on their loan. The reference to ‘‘defaults’’ authorizes the Secretary to ‘‘avoid’’ defaults; it does not require that he preserve their possibility. And the Higher Education Act provisions regarding the ‘‘return’’ of overpayments relate only to specific processes and calculations under which students are required to return grant and loan assistance if they withdraw from their school, see 20 U.S.C. 1091b; there is no conceivable reading of this provision that reflects a congressional intent that all borrowers, including those not covered by the section 1091b overpayment provisions, are required to repay their loans in full. Third, the memorandum concludes that the authority to ‘‘waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision’’ is limited to the definition of ‘‘modify’’ that was adopted for an unrelated telecommunications statute, and ‘‘does not authorize major changes.’’ Jan. 2021 Mem. at 6. The memorandum draws its definition of modify from MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Telephone & Telegraph Co., 512 U.S. 218, 225 (1994). In that case, the statutory provisions under review applied no clear limiting principle to a grant of modification authority to the FCC; the statute allowed modifications ‘‘in [the FCC’s] discretion and for good cause shown.’’ Id. at 224 (quoting 47 U.S.C. 203 (1988 ed. and Supp. IV)). Here, the HEROES Act itself clearly speaks to the scope of modification authority: the Secretary may make those modifications as may be ‘‘necessary to ensure’’ specific enumerated purposes. 20 U.S.C. 1098bb. The Secretary may not make modifications going beyond that limit, but nor is he restricted to a degree of modifications that would fall short of ‘‘ensur[ing]’’ the enumerated purposes are PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52945 achieved. Moreover, the HEROES Act broadly authorizes the Secretary to act as he ‘‘deems necessary’’ to ‘‘waive or modify’’ any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student aid program. The January 2021 memorandum’s interpretation of ‘‘modify’’ would read the Act to authorize the Secretary to waive entirely or to make non-major changes in the relevant statutory or regulatory provisions, but not authorize the Secretary to do anything in between. That interpretation is illogical, and nothing in the HEROES Act’s broad grant of authority supports such a reading. We have discussed these and other aspects of the January 2021 memorandum with the Office of Legal Counsel, and we further find persuasive the discussion of the January 2021 memorandum offered in the Office of Legal Counsel’s memorandum, which will be published in tandem with this memorandum’s recommended publication. Conclusion For the reasons detailed above, I recommend that you (1) determine that the January 2021 memorandum is formally rescinded as substantively incorrect and (2) authorize publication in the Federal Register and public posting of this memorandum as the Department’s interpretation of the HEROES Act. [FR Doc. 2022–18731 Filed 8–29–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Proposed Agency Information Collection Bonneville Power Administration, Department of Energy. ACTION: Submission for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review; comment request. AGENCY: The Department of Energy (DOE), Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), invites public comment on a collection of information that BPA is developing for submission to OMB pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed collection, Contractor Safety, will be used to manage portions of the Safety program that are related to contractors. These collection instruments allow for compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. DATES: Comments regarding this proposed information collection must be received on or before October 31, 2022. If you anticipate any difficulty in submitting comments within that period, contact the person listed in the SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section as soon as possible. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52943-52945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Notice of Debt Cancellation Legal Memorandum

AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Education.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department publishes this memorandum on the Secretary's 
legal authority to cancel student debt on a categorical basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Siegel, U.S. Department of 
Education, Office of the General Counsel, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,

[[Page 52944]]

room 6E-105, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 987-1508. Email: 
[email protected].
    If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and 
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department publishes this memorandum on 
the Secretary's legal authority to cancel student debt on a categorical 
basis. The debt relief memorandum is in Appendix A of this notice.
    Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed 
above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with 
disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format. The 
Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that 
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, 
an MP3 file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other 
accessible format.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this 
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published 
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

Miguel A. Cardona,
Secretary of Education.

Appendix A--Debt Cancellation Legal Memorandum

TO: Miguel A. Cardona Secretary of Education
FROM: Lisa Brown General Counsel
DATE: August 23, 2022
SUBJECT: The Secretary's Legal Authority for Debt Cancellation

Introduction

    For the past year and a half, the Office of General Counsel 
(``OGC''), in consultation with our colleagues at the Department of 
Justice Office of Legal Counsel, has conducted a review of the 
Secretary's legal authority to cancel student debt on a categorical 
basis. This review has included assessing the analysis outlined in a 
publicly disseminated January 2021 memorandum signed by a former 
Principal Deputy General Counsel. As detailed below, we have 
determined that the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for 
Students (``HEROES'') Act of 2003 grants the Secretary authority 
that could be used to effectuate a program of targeted loan 
cancellation directed at addressing the financial harms of the 
COVID-19 pandemic. We have thus determined that the January 2021 
memorandum was substantively incorrect in its conclusions.
    Given the significant public interest in this issue, and the 
potential for public confusion caused by the public availability of 
the January 2021 memorandum, I recommend making this memorandum 
publicly available and publishing it in the Federal Register, so as 
to provide the general public with notice of the Department's 
interpretation of the HEROES Act, consistent with statutory 
requirements. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Office of Legal Counsel has made its own analysis of the 
Secretary's authority, which will be published in tandem with this 
memorandum's recommended publication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. The Secretary's HEROES Act Authority

    The HEROES Act, first enacted in the wake of the September 11 
attacks, provides the Secretary broad authority to grant relief from 
student loan requirements during specific periods (a war, other 
military operation, or national emergency, such as the present 
COVID-19 pandemic) and for specific purposes (including to address 
the financial harms of such a war, other military operation, or 
emergency). The Secretary of Education has used this authority, 
under both this and every prior administration since the Act's 
passage, to provide relief to borrowers in connection with a war, 
other military operation, or national emergency, including the 
ongoing moratorium on student loan payments and interest.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Federal Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance General 
Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal 
Direct Loan Program, and Federal-Work Study Programs), 85 FR 79,856, 
79,856 (Dec. 11, 2020) (``Secretary [DeVos] is issuing these waivers 
and modifications under the authority of the HEROES Act[.]''); 
Federal Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance General Provisions, 
Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, 
and the Federal Direct Loan Program), 77 FR 59,311, 59,312 (Sept. 
27, 2012) (``In accordance with the HEROES Act, . . . Secretary 
[Duncan] is providing the waivers and modifications of statutory and 
regulatory provisions applicable to the student financial assistance 
programs[.]''); Federal Student Aid Programs (Student Assistance 
General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Direct 
Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program and the Federal 
Pell Grant Program), 68 FR 69,312, 69,312 (Dec. 12, 2003) 
(``Secretary [Paige] is issuing these waivers and modifications 
under the authority of section 2(a) of the Higher Education Relief 
Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act of 2003[.]'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the HEROES Act authorizes the Secretary to ``waive 
or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the 
student financial assistance programs'' if the Secretary ``deems'' 
such waivers or modifications ``necessary to ensure'' at least one 
of several enumerated purposes, including that borrowers are ``not 
placed in a worse position financially'' because of a national 
emergency. 20 U.S.C. 1098bb(a)(1), (2)(A).
    Several provisions of the HEROES Act indicate that Congress 
intended the Act to confer broad authority under the circumstances, 
and for the purposes, specified by the Act. First, the Act grants 
authority ``[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, unless 
enacted with specific reference to this section.'' Id. Sec.  
1098bb(a)(1). Second, the Act authorizes the Secretary to waive or 
modify ``any'' statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the 
student financial assistance programs. Id. Sec.  1098bb(a)(1), 
(a)(2). Third, the Act expressly authorizes the Secretary to issue 
such waivers and modifications as he ``deems necessary in connection 
with a war or other military operation or national emergency.'' Id. 
Sec.  1098bb(a)(1). The Supreme Court has recognized that, in 
empowering a federal official to act as that official ``deems 
necessary'' in circumstances specified by a statute, Congress has 
granted the official broad discretion to take such action.\3\ This 
authority is not, however, boundless: it is limited, inter alia, to 
periods of a war, other military operation, or national emergency 
(id. Sec.  1098bb(a)(1)), to certain categories of eligible 
individuals or institutions (id. Sec.  1098ee(2)), and to a defined 
set of purposes (id. Sec.  1098bb(a)(2)(A)-(E)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Webster v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592, 600 (1988) (statute 
authorizing action when an agency head ``shall deem such [action] 
necessary or advisable'' ``fairly exudes deference'' to agency head 
and ``strongly suggests that its implementation was `committed to 
agency discretion by law' '' (second emphasis added) (some quotation 
marks omitted)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In present circumstances, this authority could be used to 
effectuate a program of categorical debt cancellation directed at 
addressing the financial harms caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The 
Secretary could waive or modify statutory and regulatory provisions 
to effectuate a certain amount of cancellation for borrowers who 
have been financially harmed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The 
Secretary's determinations regarding the amount of relief, and the 
categories of borrowers for whom relief is necessary, should be 
informed by evidence regarding the financial harms that borrowers 
have experienced, or will likely experience, because of the COVID-19 
pandemic. But the Secretary's authority can be exercised 
categorically to address the situation at hand; it does not need to 
be exercised ``on a case-by-case basis.'' Id. Sec.  1098bb(b)(3). 
That is, he is not required to determine or show that any individual 
borrower is entitled to a specific amount of relief, and he instead 
may provide relief on a categorical basis as necessary to address 
the financial harms of the pandemic.

II. The January 2021 Memorandum

    On January 7, 2021, Secretary DeVos resigned from her position 
as Secretary of Education, effective January 8, 2021. On January 13, 
a news outlet published a memorandum signed January 12 by the then-
Principal Deputy General Counsel, addressed to ``Betsy DeVos[,] 
Secretary of Education.'' \4\

[[Page 52945]]

Two substantively identical versions of that memorandum were posted 
to the website of the Office of Postsecondary Education, dated 
January 12 and January 18 (collectively, the ``January 2021 
memorandum''). Having reviewed the memorandum in consultation with 
the Office of Legal Counsel, we have determined that although it 
accurately describes the core features of the HEROES Act, its 
ultimate conclusions are unsupported and incorrect.\5\ As such, it 
should be rescinded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Michael Stratford, Trump Administration Tries to Hamstring 
Biden on Student Loan Forgiveness, Politico (Jan. 13, 2021).
    \5\ In addition to determining that the conclusions contained in 
the January 2021 memorandum were substantively incorrect, we have 
determined that the memorandum was issued in contravention of then-
effective Department processes for issuing significant guidance. An 
Interim Final Rule issued by the Department on October 5, 2020, 
pursuant to Executive Order 13,891, established additional 
procedures for the issuance of guidance documents. See Rulemaking 
and Guidance Procedures, 85 FR 62,597 (Oct. 5, 2020); see also Exec. 
Order No. 13,891, 84 FR 55,235 (Oct. 9, 2019). That rule established 
new requirements for the issuance of guidance and ``significant 
guidance,'' defining the latter term to include guidance documents 
that ``[r]aise novel, legal, or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates [or] the President's priorities.'' 85 FR at 62,608. The 
public dissemination of the January 2021 memorandum violated a 
number of provisions of this rule, including that guidance must be 
``accessible through the Department's guidance portal,'' and that, 
barring compelling cause, all significant guidance may be published 
only after a 30-day public comment period and review by the Office 
of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12,866 of September 
30, 1993. Id. That rule was rescinded in September 2021, 86 FR 
53,863 (Sept. 29, 2021), but it was in effect at the time of the 
January 2021 memorandum's publication. Thus, OGC has determined that 
the January 2021 memorandum was not properly promulgated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As an initial matter, the bulk of the January 2021 memorandum's 
discussion of HEROES Act authority describes and quotes the key 
provisions of the HEROES Act. The memorandum explains that the 
HEROES Act provides the Secretary ``authority to provide specified 
[\6\] waivers or modifications to Title IV federal financial student 
aid program statutory and regulatory requirements because of the 
declared National Emergency,'' identifies that declared emergency as 
the COVID-19 national emergency declared on March 18, 2020, and 
characterizes this authority as ``narrowly cabined'' to achieving 
five enumerated purposes, including ``ensur[ing] that . . . 
recipients of student financial assistance under title IV of the Act 
who are affected individuals are not placed in a worse position 
financially in relation to that financial assistance because of 
their status as affected individuals.'' Jan. 2021 Mem. at 5-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ We read the term ``specified'' as acknowledging statutory 
limits on HEROES Act authority, including the enumerated purposes of 
20 U.S.C. 1098bb(b)(1), and not as suggesting any atextual 
limitations on the Act's clear grant of authority to waive or modify 
``any'' statutory or regulatory provision applicable to student aid 
programs, provided other HEROES Act requirements are met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The memorandum goes on to read in purported limitations on the 
scope of relief that may be afforded that are contrary to the clear 
text of the Act. The memorandum advances three primary arguments in 
support of a conclusion that ``Congress never intended the HEROES 
Act as authority for mass cancellation, compromise, discharge, or 
forgiveness of student loan principal balances, and/or to materially 
modify repayment amounts or terms.'' Jan. 2021 Mem. at 6.
    First, the memorandum recites certain statutory limits on the 
Secretary's authority, including the HEROES Act's statutory 
definition of individuals eligible for relief, 20 U.S.C. 1098ee(2), 
and the enumerated purposes for which waivers or modifications may 
be issued, id. Sec.  1098bb(a)(2).
    The memorandum is correct that such statutory provisions exist 
but provides no support for the suggestion that these provisions 
impose limitations beyond their clear terms. See Jan. 2021 Mem. at 
6.
    Second, the memorandum points to the HEROES Act's references to 
avoiding ``defaults'' and a ``cross-cite'' to a separate provision 
of the Higher Education Act relating to the ``return'' of student 
loan funds, concluding that these provisions ``provide a strong 
textual basis for concluding Congress intended loans to be repaid.'' 
Id. But these provisions--which identify as allowable purposes 
issuing waivers or modifications to avoid defaults and granting 
relief from certain requirements that borrowers return certain 
payments--in no way impose a requirement that any exercise of HEROES 
Act authority must ensure that every borrower is left with a 
remaining balance on their loan. The reference to ``defaults'' 
authorizes the Secretary to ``avoid'' defaults; it does not require 
that he preserve their possibility. And the Higher Education Act 
provisions regarding the ``return'' of overpayments relate only to 
specific processes and calculations under which students are 
required to return grant and loan assistance if they withdraw from 
their school, see 20 U.S.C. 1091b; there is no conceivable reading 
of this provision that reflects a congressional intent that all 
borrowers, including those not covered by the section 1091b 
overpayment provisions, are required to repay their loans in full.
    Third, the memorandum concludes that the authority to ``waive or 
modify any statutory or regulatory provision'' is limited to the 
definition of ``modify'' that was adopted for an unrelated 
telecommunications statute, and ``does not authorize major 
changes.'' Jan. 2021 Mem. at 6. The memorandum draws its definition 
of modify from MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Telephone & Telegraph 
Co., 512 U.S. 218, 225 (1994). In that case, the statutory 
provisions under review applied no clear limiting principle to a 
grant of modification authority to the FCC; the statute allowed 
modifications ``in [the FCC's] discretion and for good cause 
shown.'' Id. at 224 (quoting 47 U.S.C. 203 (1988 ed. and Supp. IV)). 
Here, the HEROES Act itself clearly speaks to the scope of 
modification authority: the Secretary may make those modifications 
as may be ``necessary to ensure'' specific enumerated purposes. 20 
U.S.C. 1098bb. The Secretary may not make modifications going beyond 
that limit, but nor is he restricted to a degree of modifications 
that would fall short of ``ensur[ing]'' the enumerated purposes are 
achieved. Moreover, the HEROES Act broadly authorizes the Secretary 
to act as he ``deems necessary'' to ``waive or modify'' any 
statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student aid 
program. The January 2021 memorandum's interpretation of ``modify'' 
would read the Act to authorize the Secretary to waive entirely or 
to make non-major changes in the relevant statutory or regulatory 
provisions, but not authorize the Secretary to do anything in 
between. That interpretation is illogical, and nothing in the HEROES 
Act's broad grant of authority supports such a reading.
    We have discussed these and other aspects of the January 2021 
memorandum with the Office of Legal Counsel, and we further find 
persuasive the discussion of the January 2021 memorandum offered in 
the Office of Legal Counsel's memorandum, which will be published in 
tandem with this memorandum's recommended publication.

Conclusion

    For the reasons detailed above, I recommend that you (1) 
determine that the January 2021 memorandum is formally rescinded as 
substantively incorrect and (2) authorize publication in the Federal 
Register and public posting of this memorandum as the Department's 
interpretation of the HEROES Act.

[FR Doc. 2022-18731 Filed 8-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.