Petition for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standards, 53016-53020 [2022-18618]
Download as PDF
53016
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices
measure of protection afforded the
miners under the mandatory standard.
Song-ae Aromie Noe,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances.
I. Background
[FR Doc. 2022–18610 Filed 8–29–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petition for Modification of Application
of Existing Mandatory Safety
Standards
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice is a summary of
a petition for modification submitted to
the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) by the party
listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petition
must be received by MSHA’s Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances
on or before September 29, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Docket No. MSHA–2022–
0039 by any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
for MSHA–2022–0039.
2. Fax: 202–693–9441.
3. Email: petitioncomments@dol.gov.
4. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia 22202–5452.
Attention: S. Aromie Noe, Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and
Variances. Persons delivering
documents are required to check in at
the receptionist’s desk in Suite 4E401.
Individuals may inspect copies of the
petition and comments during normal
business hours at the address listed
above. Before visiting MSHA in person,
call 202–693–9455 to make an
appointment, in keeping with the
Department of Labor’s COVID–19
policy. Special health precautions may
be required.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: S.
Aromie Noe, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202–693–
9440 (voice), Petitionsformodification@
dol.gov (email), or 202–693–9441 (fax).
[These are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 and title 30 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
44 govern the application, processing,
and disposition of petitions for
modification.
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
other mine if the Secretary of Labor
determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving
the result of such standard exists which
will at all times guarantee no less than
the same measure of protection afforded
the miners of such mine by such
standard; or
2. The application of such standard to
such mine will result in a diminution of
safety to the miners in such mine.
In addition, sections 44.10 and 44.11
of 30 CFR establish the requirements for
filing petitions for modification.
II. Petition for Modification
Docket Number: M–2022–013–C.
Petitioner: Harrison County Coal
Resources, Inc., 464 North Portal Road,
Wallace, West Virginia 26448.
Mine: Harrison County Mine, MSHA
ID No. 46–01318, located in Harrison
County, West Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1700,
Oil and gas wells.
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of 30 CFR
75.1700 to permit mining within a 300
feet barrier of slant directionally drilled
(SDD) wells and through coalbed
methane (CBM) gas wells.
The petitioner states that:
(a) The proposed alternative method
has been successfully used to prepare
CBM wells for safe intersection by using
one or more of the following methods:
cement plug, polymer gel, bentonite gel,
active pressure management and water
infusion, and remedial work.
(b) The proposed alternative method
will prevent the CBM well methane
from entering the underground mine.
(c) An existing Petition for
Modification (Docket No. M–2016–019–
C granted on June 30, 2017) allows the
plugging methods outlined in the
proposed alternative method to be used
at the Harrison County Mine for vertical
oil and gas wells.
The petitioner proposes the following
alternative method:
(a) District Manager approval
required:
(1) A minimum working barrier of 300
feet in diameter shall be maintained
around all SDD wells until approval to
proceed with mining has been obtained
from the District Manager. This barrier
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
extends around all vertical and
horizontal branches drilled in the coal
seam. This barrier also extends around
all vertical and horizontal branches
within overlying coal seams subject to
caving or subsidence from the coal seam
being mined when methane leakage
through the subsidence zone is possible.
(2) The District Manager may choose
to approve each well or a group of wells
as applicable to the conditions. To
prepare the SDD wells for intersection,
the District Manager may require a
certified review by a professional
engineer to assess the applicability of
the proposed system(s) to the minespecific conditions.
(b) Mandatory computations and
administrative procedures prior to
plugging or replugging SDD wells after
District Manager approval has been
obtained:
(1) Probable Error of Location—
Directional drilling systems rely on
sophisticated angular measurement
systems and computer models to
calculate the estimated location of the
well bore. This estimated hole location
is subject to cumulative measurement
errors so that the distance between
actual and estimated location of the well
bore increases with the depth of the
hole. Modern directional drilling
systems are typically accurate within
one or two degrees depending on the
specific equipment and techniques.
(i) The Probable Error of Location
(EErr) is defined by a cone described by
the average accuracy of angular
measurement (aa) around the length of
the hole (LLHH), calculated by the
following equation: EErr = LLHH × sin
aa. For example, mining projected to
intersect a well at a point 4,000 feet
from the collar, measured along the well
path, would consider a probable error
radius of 69.8 feet about the projected
point of intersection. EErr = 4,000 ×
sin(1°) = 69.8.
(ii) In addition to the Probable Error
of Location, the true point of
intersection may be affected by
underground survey errors, surface
survey errors, and survey errors.
(2) Minimum Working Barrier Around
Well—The minimum working barrier
around any CBM well or branches of a
CBM well in the coal seam is 50 feet
greater than the calculated Probable
Error of Location.
(i) For example, mining projected to
intersect a well at a point 4,000 feet
from the collar, measured along the well
path, would consider a probable error
radius of 69.8 feet about the projected
point of intersection. Therefore, the
minimum working barrier around this
point of the well bore is 120 feet. The
additional 50 feet is a reasonable
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices
separation between the probable
location of the well and mining
operations.
(ii) When mining is within the
minimum working barrier distance from
a CBM well or branch, the operator must
comply with the provisions of the
Proposed Decision and Order.
(iii) The District Manager may require
a greater minimum working barrier
around CBM wells where geologic
conditions, historical location errors, or
other factors warrant a greater barrier.
(3) Ventilation Plan Requirements—
The Ventilation Plan shall identify SDD
CBM wells within the active mining
area and any projected mining area as
specified in 30 CFR 75.372(b)(14) and,
where intersection is projected, note the
well casing type, diameter, and
preparation method for the defined
working barrier. If the well has not been
prepared for intersection, the techniques
which the operator plans to implement
shall also be included. Actions
necessary to implement such
techniques, as well as required
operational precautions for mining
within the minimum working barrier
shall also be included. Further
operational precautions to be taken
when mining within the minimum
working barrier may be required by the
District Manager.
(4) Ventilation Map—The ventilation
map specified in 30 CFR 75.372 shall
contain the following information:
(i) The surface location of all CBM
wells in the active mining area and any
projected mining area as specified in 30
CFR 75.372(b)(14);
(ii) Identifying information of CBM
wells (American Petroleum Institute or
equivalent);
(iii) The coal seam intersection of all
CBM wells;
(iv) The horizontal extents in the coal
seam of all CBM wells and branches;
(v) If intersected, the date of mine
intersection and the location of such
intersection relative to the expected
point.
(c) Mandatory procedures for plugging
or replugging SDD wells:
(1) The operator shall include in the
mine ventilation plan one or more of the
following methods specified in sections
(c)(3) through (c)(7) to prepare SDD
wells for safe intersection.
(2) The methods approved in the
ventilation plan must be completed on
each SDD well before mining
encroaches on the minimum working
barrier around the well or branch of the
well in the coal seam being mined. If
methane leakage through subsidence
cracks is a problem when retreat
mining, the minimum working barrier
must be maintained around wells and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
branches in overlying coal seams or the
wells and branches must be prepared for
safe intersection as specified in the
mine ventilation plan.
(3) Cement Plug—Cement may be
used to fill the entire SDD hole system.
(i) Squeeze cementing techniques are
necessary for SDD plugging due to the
lack of tubing in the hole. Cement
should fill void spaces and eliminate
methane leakage along the hole. Once
the cement has cured, the SDD system
may be intersected multiple times
without further hole preparation.
(ii) Gas cutting occurs if the
placement pressure of the cement is less
than the methane pressure in the coal
seam. Under these conditions, gas will
bubble out of the coal seam and into the
unset cement creating a pressurized
void or a series of interconnected
pressurized voids. Water cutting occurs
when formation water and standing
water in the hole invades or displaces
the unset cement. Standing water must
be bailed out of the hole or driven into
the formation with compressed gas to
minimize water cutting. The cement
pressure must be maintained higher
than the formation pressure until the
cement sets to minimize both gas and
water cutting. The cementing program
in the ventilation plan must address
both gas and water cutting.
(iii) Due to the large volume to be
cemented and potential problems with
cement setting prior to filling the entire
SDD system, adequately sized pumping
units with back-up capacity must be
used. Various additives such as
retarders, lightweight extenders,
viscosity modifiers, thixotropic
modifiers, and fly ash may be used in
the cement mix. The volume of cement
pumped should exceed the estimated
hole volume to ensure the complete
filling of all voids.
(iv) The complete cementing program,
including hole dewatering, cement,
additives, pressures, pumping times and
equipment must be specified in the
ventilation plan. The safety data sheets
(SDSs) for all cements, additives, and
components and details regarding
personal protective equipment and
techniques to protect workers from the
potentially harmful effects of the cement
and cement components shall be
included in the ventilation plan.
(v) Records of cement mixes, cement
quantities, pump pressures, and flow
rates and times should be retained for
each hole plugged. SDD holes may be
plugged with cement years in advance
of mining. The District Manager shall
require suitable documentation of the
cement plugging to approve mining
within the minimum working barrier
around CBM wells.
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53017
(4) Polymer Gel—Polymer gels start
out as low viscosity, water-based
mixtures of organic polymers that are
crosslinked using time-delayed
activators to form a water-insoluble,
high-viscosity gel after being pumped
into the SDD system.
(i) Although polymer gel systems
never solidify, the activated gel should
develop sufficient strength to resist gas
flow. A gel that is suitable for treating
SDD wells for mine intersection will
reliably fill the SDD system and prevent
gas-filled voids. Any gel chemistry used
for plugging SDD wells should be
resistant to bacterial and chemical
degradation and remain stable for the
duration of mining through a SDD
system.
(ii) Water may dilute the gel mixture
to the point where it will not set to the
required strength. Thus, water in the
holes must be removed before injecting
the gel mixture. Water removal can be
accomplished by conventional bailing
and then injecting compressed gas to
squeeze the water that accumulates in
low spots back into the formation. Gas
pressurization should be continued
until the hole is dry.
(iii) Dissolved salts in the formation
waters may interfere with the crosslinking reactions. Any proposed gel
mixtures must be tested with actual
formation waters.
(iv) Equipment to mix and pump gels
should have adequate capacity to fill the
hole before the gel sets. Back-up units
should be available while pumping.
(v) The volume of gel pumped should
exceed the estimated hole volume to
ensure the complete filling of all voids
and allow for gel to infiltrate the joints
in the coal seam surrounding the hole.
Gel injection and setting pressures
should be specified in the ventilation
plan.
(vi) To reduce the potential for an
inundation of gel, the final level of gel
should be close to the level of the coal
seam and the remainder of the hole
should remain open to the atmosphere
until mining in the vicinity of the SDD
system is completed. Packers may be
used to isolate portions of the SDD
system.
(vii) The complete polymer gel
program, including the advance testing
of the gel with formation water,
dewatering systems, gel specifications,
gel quantities, gel placement, pressures,
and pumping equipment must be
specified in the ventilation plan. The
SDSs for all gel components and details
regarding personal protective equipment
and techniques to protect workers from
the potentially harmful effects of the gel
and gel components shall be included in
the ventilation plan. A record of the
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
53018
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices
calculated hole volume, gel quantities,
gel formulation, pump pressures, and
flow rates and times should be retained
for each hole that is treated with gel.
Other gel chemistries other than organic
polymers may be included in the
ventilation plan with appropriate
methods, parameters, and safety
precautions.
(5) Bentonite Gel—High-pressure
injection of bentonite gel into the SDD
system will infiltrate the cleat and butt
joints of the coal seam near the well
bore and effectively seal these conduits
against the flow of methane.
(i) Bentonite gel is a thixotropic fluid
that sets when it stops moving.
Bentonite gel has a significantly lower
setting viscosity than polymer gel.
While the polymer gel fills and seals the
borehole, the lower strength bentonite
gel must penetrate the fractures and
jointing in the coal seam to be effective
in reducing formation permeability
around the hole. The use of bentonite
gel is restricted to depleted CBM
applications with low abandonment
pressures and limited recharge
potential. In general, these applications
will be in mature CBM fields with long
production histories.
(ii) A slug of water should be injected
prior to the bentonite gel to minimize
moisture-loss bridging near the well
bore. The volume of gel pumped should
exceed the estimated hole volume to
ensure that the gel infiltrates the joints
in the coal seam for several feet
surrounding the hole. Due to the large
gel volume and potential problems with
premature thixotropic setting,
adequately sized pumping units with
back-up capacity are required.
(iii) Additives to the gel may be
required to modify viscosity, reduce
filtrates, reduce surface tension, and
promote sealing of the cracks and joints
around the hole. To reduce the potential
for an inundation of bentonite gel, the
final level of gel should be
approximately the elevation of the coal
seam and the remainder of the hole
should remain open to the atmosphere
until mining in the vicinity of the SDD
system is completed. If a water column
is used to pressurize the gel, it must be
bailed down to the coal seam elevation
prior to intersection.
(iv) The complete bentonite gel
program, including formation
infiltration and permeability reduction
data, hole pretreatment, gel
specifications, additives, gel quantities,
flow rates, injection pressures, and
infiltration times, must be specified in
the ventilation plan. The ventilation
plan should list the equipment used to
prepare and pump the gel. The SDSs for
all gel components and details regarding
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
personal protective equipment and
techniques to protect workers from the
potentially harmful effects of the gel and
additives shall be included in the
ventilation plan. A record of hole
preparation, gel quantities, gel
formulation, pump pressures, and flow
rates and times should be retained for
each hole that is treated with bentonite
gel.
(6) Active Pressure Management and
Water Infusion—Reducing the pressure
in the hole to less than atmospheric
pressure by operating a vacuum blower
connected to the wellhead may facilitate
safe intersection of the hole by a coal
mine. The negative pressure in the hole
will limit the quantity of methane
released into the higher pressure mine
atmosphere. If the mine intersection is
near the end of a horizontal branch of
the SDD system, air will flow from the
mine into the upstream side of the hole
and be exhausted through the blower on
the surface. On the downstream side of
the intersection, if the open hole length
is short, the methane emitted from this
side of the hole may be diluted to safe
levels with ventilation air. Conversely,
safely intersecting this system near the
bottom of the vertical hole may not be
possible because the methane emissions
from the multiple downstream branches
may be too great to dilute with
ventilation air. The methane emission
rate is directly proportional to the
length of the open hole.
(i) Successful application of vacuum
systems may be limited by caving of the
hole or water collected in dips in the
SDD system. Another important factor
in the success of vacuum systems is the
methane liberation rate of the coal
formation around the well; older, more
depleted wells that have lower methane
emission rates are more amenable to this
technique. The remaining methane
content and the formation permeability
shall be addressed in the ventilation
plan.
(ii) Packers may be used to reduce
methane inflow into the coal mine after
intersection. All packers on the
downstream side of the hole must be
equipped with a center pipe so that the
inby methane pressure may be
measured or so that water may be
injected. Subsequent intersections shall
not take place if pressure in a packersealed hole is excessive.
(iii) Alternatively, methane produced
by the downstream hole may be piped
to an in-mine degas system to safely
transport the methane out of the mine
or may be piped to the return air course
for dilution. In-mine methane piping
shall be protected as stipulated in
‘‘Piping Methane in Underground Coal
Mines,’’ MSHA IR1094 (1978). Protected
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
methane diffusion zones may be
established in return air courses if
needed.
(iv) Detailed sketches and safety
precautions for methane collection,
piping, and diffusion systems must be
included in the ventilation plan per 30
CFR75.371(ee).
(v) Water infusion prior to
intersecting the well will temporarily
limit methane flow. Water infusion may
also help control coal dust levels during
mining. High water infusion pressures
may be obtained prior to the initial
intersection by the hydraulic head
resulting from the hole depth or by
pumping. Water infusion pressures for
subsequent intersections are limited by
leakage around in-mine packers and
limitations of the mine water
distribution system. If water is infused
prior to the initial intersection, the
water level in the hole must be lowered
to the coal seam elevation before the
intersection.
(vi) The ventilation plan should
include/address the following:
(A) The complete pressure
management strategy including negative
pressure application, wellhead
equipment, use of packers, in-mine
piping, methane dilution, and water
infusion.
(B) Procedures for controlling
methane in the downstream hole.
(C) Remaining methane content and
formation permeability.
(D) Potential for the coal seam to cave
into the well.
(E) Dewatering methods.
(F) Record of the negative pressures
applied to the system, methane
liberation, use of packers, any water
infusion pressures, and application time
should be retained for each intersection.
(7) Remedial work—If problems are
encountered in preparing the holes for
safe intersection, remedial measures
must be taken to protect the miners. For
example, if only one-half of the
calculated hole volume of cement could
be placed into a SDD well due to hole
blockage, holes should be drilled near
each branch that will be intersected and
squeeze cemented using pressures
sufficient to fracture into the potentially
empty SDD holes. The District Manager
approval of the ventilation plan for
remedial +work shall be obtained on a
case-by-case basis.
(d) Mandatory procedures after
District Manager approval to mine
within the minimum working barrier
around the well or branch of the well:
(1) The operator, the District Manager,
the miners’ representative, or the State
may request a conference prior to any
intersection or after any intersection to
discuss issues or concerns. Upon receipt
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices
of any such request, the District
Manager shall schedule a conference.
The party requesting the conference
shall notify all other parties listed above
within a reasonable time prior to the
conference to provide opportunity for
participation.
(2) The operator must notify the
District Manager, the State, and the
miners’ representative at least 48 hours
prior to the intended intersection of any
CBM well.
(3) The initial intersection of a well or
branch of a well typically has a higher
risk than subsequent intersections and
indicates if the well preparation is
sufficient to prevent the inundation of
methane. For the initial intersection of
a well or branch, the following
procedures are mandatory:
(i) Entries that will intersect either
vertical segments or branches of a well
shall be noted with a readily visible
marking that notes the distance to the
well. Such marking shall be located in
the last open crosscut when mining is
within 100 feet of the well.
(ii) When a segment of a well will be
intersected by a longwall, drivage sights
shall be installed on 10 feet centers
starting 50 feet in advance of the
anticipated intersection. Drivage sights
shall be installed in the headgate entry
of the longwall and note the shield
number at which the anticipated
intersection is expected to occur or
begin in the case of a horizontal branch.
(iii) The operator shall ensure that
fire-fighting equipment, including fire
extinguishers, rock dust, and sufficient
fire hose to reach the working face area
of the mine-through (when either the
conventional or the continuous mining
method is used), is available and
operable during all well mine-throughs.
The fire hose shall be located in the last
open crosscut of the entry or room. The
operator shall maintain the water line to
the belt conveyor tailpiece along with a
sufficient amount of fire hose to reach
the farthest point of penetration on the
section. When the longwall mining
method is used, a hose to the longwall
water supply is sufficient. All fire hoses
shall be connected and ready for use,
but do not have to be charged with
water, during the cut-through.
(iv) The operator shall ensure that
sufficient supplies of roof support and
ventilation materials are available at the
working section. In addition, emergency
plugs, packers, and setting tools to seal
both sides of the well or branch shall be
available in the immediate area of the
cut-through.
(v) When mining advances within the
minimum working barrier distance from
the well or branch of the well, the
operator shall service all equipment and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
check for permissibility at least once
daily. Daily permissibility examinations
must continue until the well or branch
is intersected or until mining exits the
minimum working barrier around the
well or branch.
(vi) When mining advances within the
minimum working barrier distance from
the well or branch of the well, the
operator shall calibrate the methane
monitor(s) on the longwall, continuous
mining machine, or cutting machine
and loading machine at least once daily.
Daily methane monitor calibration must
continue until the well or branch is
intersected or until mining exits the
minimum working barrier around the
well or branch.
(vii) When mining is in progress, the
operator shall perform tests for methane
with a handheld methane detector at
least every 10 minutes from when the
mining with the continuous mining
machine or longwall face is within the
minimum working barrier around the
well or branch. During the cutting
process, no individual shall be allowed
on the return side until the minethrough has been completed and the
area has been examined and declared
safe. The shearer must be idle when any
miners are inby the tail drum.
(viii) When using continuous or
conventional mining methods, the
working place shall be free from
accumulations of coal dust and coal
spillages, and rock dust shall be placed
on the roof, rib, and floor within 20 feet
of the face when mining through the
well or branch. On longwall sections,
rock dust shall be applied on the roof,
rib, and floor up to both the headgate
and tailgate pillared area.
(ix) Immediately after the well or
branch is intersected, the operator shall
de-energize all equipment, and the
certified person shall thoroughly
examine and determine the working
place safe before mining is resumed.
(x) After a well or branch has been
intersected and the working place
determined safe, mining shall continue
in by the well at a sufficient distance to
permit adequate ventilation around the
area of the well or branch.
(xi) No open flame shall be permitted
in the area until adequate ventilation
has been established around the well
bore or branch. Any casing, tubing, or
stuck tools will be removed using the
methods approved in the ventilation
plan.
(xii) No person except those directly
engaged in the operation shall be
permitted in the working place of the
mine-through operation during active
mining.
(xiii) The operator shall warn all
personnel directly engaged in the
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53019
operation of the planned intersection of
the well or branch prior to going
underground if the intersection is to
occur during their shift.
(xiv) The mine-through operation
shall be under the direct supervision of
a certified person. Instructions
concerning the mine-through operation
shall be issued only by the certified
person in charge.
(xv) All miners shall be in known
locations and stay in communication
with the responsible person, in
accordance with the site-specific
approved Emergency Response Plan,
when active mining occurs within the
minimum working barrier of the well or
branch.
(xvi) The responsible person required
under 30 CFR 75.1501 is responsible for
well intersection emergencies. The well
intersection procedures must be
reviewed by the responsible person
prior to any planned intersection.
(xvii) A copy of the Decision and
Order shall be maintained at the mine
and be available to the miners.
(xviii) The provisions of the Decision
and Order do not impair the authority
of representatives of MSHA to interrupt
or halt the mine through operation and
to issue a withdrawal order when they
deem it necessary for the safety of the
miners. MSHA may order an
interruption or cessation of the minethrough operation and/or a withdrawal
of personnel by issuing either an oral or
a written order to a representative of the
operator, which shall include the basis
for the order. Operations in the affected
area of the mine may not resume until
a representative of MSHA permits
resumption of mine-through operations.
The operator and miners shall comply
with verbal or written MSHA orders
immediately. All oral orders shall be
committed to writing within a
reasonable time as conditions permit.
(xix) For subsequent intersections of
branches of a well, appropriate
procedures to protect the miners shall
be specified in the ventilation plan.
(e) Mandatory procedures after SDD
intersections:
(1) All intersections with SDD wells
and branches that are in intake air
courses shall be examined as part of the
pre-shift examinations required under
30 CFR 75.360.
(2) All other intersections with SDD
wells and branches shall be examined as
part of the weekly examinations
required under 30 CFR 75.364.
(f) Other requirements:
(1) A minimum working barrier of 300
feet in diameter shall be maintained
around all SDD wells until the operator
submits proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR part 48 training plan
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
53020
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2022 / Notices
to the District Manager. These proposed
revisions shall include initial and
refresher training regarding compliance
with the terms and conditions stated in
the Decision and Order. The operator
shall provide all miners involved in the
mine-through of a well or branch with
training regarding the requirements of
the Decision and Order prior to mining
within the minimum working barrier of
the next well or branch intended to be
mined through.
(2) A minimum working barrier of 300
feet in diameter shall be maintained
around all SDD wells until the operator
has submitted proposed revisions for its
approved mine emergency evacuation
and firefighting program of instruction
required by 30 CFR 75.1502. The
operator shall revise the program to
include the hazards and evacuation
procedures to be used for well
intersections. All underground miners
shall be trained in this revised program
according to the revised mine
emergency evacuation and firefighting
program of instruction prior to mining
within the minimum working barrier.
The petitioner asserts that the
alternative method proposed will at all
times guarantee no less than the same
measure of protection afforded the
miners under the mandatory standard.
Song-ae Aromie Noe,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2022–18618 Filed 8–29–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2013–0020]
Process Safety Management (PSM);
Stakeholder Meeting
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice of stakeholder meeting.
AGENCY:
OSHA invites interested
parties to participate in an informal
stakeholder meeting concerning the
rulemaking project for OSHA’s Process
Safety Management (PSM) standard, at
which OSHA will provide a brief
overview of its work on the PSM
rulemaking project to date.
Additionally, OSHA invites participants
to provide public comments related to
potential changes to the standard that
OSHA is considering.
DATES: The stakeholder meeting will be
held from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, on
Wednesday, September 28, 2022.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
Registration to participate in or observe
the stakeholder meeting will be open
until all spots are full. Written
comments must be submitted by
October 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Registration: The
stakeholder meeting will be held
virtually on WebEx. If you wish to
attend the meeting or provide public
comment, please register online as soon
as possible at https://www.osha.gov/
process-safety-management/
background/2022stakeholdermtg. If you
are interested in providing public
comments at the meeting, you must
indicate that while registering. In order
to accommodate many speakers, public
commenters will be allowed
approximately three minutes to speak.
Although OSHA welcomes all
comments and seeks to accommodate as
many speakers as possible, it may not be
possible to accommodate all stakeholder
requests to speak at the meeting.
Stakeholders who register to speak in
advance of the meeting will receive
confirmation and a schedule of speakers
via email prior to the event. Those who
cannot attend the meeting and those
who are unable or choose not to make
verbal comments during the meeting are
invited to submit their comments in
writing (see instructions in Section III
below).
Press inquiries: Mr. Frank Meilinger,
Director, OSHA Office of
Communications, Room N–3647, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210;
telephone: (202) 693–1999; email:
meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
General and technical information:
Ms. Lisa Long, Director, Office of
Engineering Safety, OSHA Directorate of
Standards and Guidance, Room N–3621,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693–2222,
email: long.lisa@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
OSHA published the PSM standard,
29 CFR 1910.119,1 in 1992 in response
to several catastrophic chemical-release
incidents that occurred worldwide. The
PSM standard requires employers to
implement safety programs that
identify, evaluate, and control highly
hazardous chemicals. Unlike some of
OSHA’s standards, which prescribe
precisely what employers must do to
comply, the PSM standard is
‘‘performance-based,’’ and outlines 14
1 Section 1910.119 is made applicable to
construction work through 29 CFR 1926.64.
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
management system elements for
controlling highly hazardous chemicals.
Under the standard, employers have the
flexibility to tailor their PSM programs
to the unique conditions at their
facilities. For more information on the
PSM standard, please visit https://
osha.gov/process-safety-management/
background.
Since its publication in 1992, the PSM
standard has not been updated. The
2013 ammonium nitrate explosion at a
fertilizer storage facility in West, Texas
renewed interest in PSM. In response to
this incident, on August 1, 2013,
Executive Order (E.O.) 13650, Improving
Chemical Facility Safety and Security,
was signed. The E.O. directed OSHA
and several other federal agencies to,
among other things, modernize policies,
regulations, and standards to enhance
safety and security in chemical facilities
by completing certain tasks, including:
coordinating with stakeholders to
develop a plan for implementing
improvements to chemical risk
managements practices, developing
proposals to improve the safe and
secure storage handling and sale of
ammonium nitrate, and reviewing the
PSM and Risk Management Plan (RMP)
rules to determine if their covered
hazardous chemical lists should be
expanded. For more specifics on the
Executive Order and OSHA’s
collaboration with other government
agencies and stakeholders, please visit
https://www.osha.gov/chemicalexecutive-order.
Additionally, the E.O. directed that
within 90 days, OSHA should publish a
Request for Information (RFI) to identify
issues related to modernization of its
PSM standard and related standards
necessary to meet the goal of preventing
major chemical accidents. OSHA
published the RFI in December 2013,
and subsequently initiated and
completed a Small Business Advocacy
Review Panel (SBAR) in June 2016.
Following the SBAR panel, PSM was
moved to the Long-Term Actions list on
the Unified Agenda. OSHA has
continued to work on the PSM standard
rulemaking and PSM was placed back
on the Unified Agenda in the spring of
2021. OSHA is holding this stakeholder
meeting to reengage stakeholders and
solicit comments on the modernization
topics mentioned in the RFI and SBAR
panel report, as well as any additional
PSM-related issues stakeholders would
like to raise. The list of modernization
topics is listed below in Section II.
The Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has a separate, pending proposal
addressing RMP requirements. In the
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,
Congress required OSHA to adopt the
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53016-53020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18618]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petition for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standards
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is a summary of a petition for modification
submitted to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) by the
party listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petition must be received by MSHA's Office
of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before September 29,
2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Docket No. MSHA-2022-
0039 by any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments for MSHA-2022-0039.
2. Fax: 202-693-9441.
3. Email: [email protected].
4. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401,
Arlington, Virginia 22202-5452.
Attention: S. Aromie Noe, Director, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances. Persons delivering documents are required
to check in at the receptionist's desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may
inspect copies of the petition and comments during normal business
hours at the address listed above. Before visiting MSHA in person, call
202-693-9455 to make an appointment, in keeping with the Department of
Labor's COVID-19 policy. Special health precautions may be required.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: S. Aromie Noe, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9440 (voice),
[email protected] (email), or 202-693-9441 (fax). [These
are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977 and title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) part 44 govern the application, processing, and disposition of
petitions for modification.
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard
to a coal or other mine if the Secretary of Labor determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard
exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or
2. The application of such standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in such mine.
In addition, sections 44.10 and 44.11 of 30 CFR establish the
requirements for filing petitions for modification.
II. Petition for Modification
Docket Number: M-2022-013-C.
Petitioner: Harrison County Coal Resources, Inc., 464 North Portal
Road, Wallace, West Virginia 26448.
Mine: Harrison County Mine, MSHA ID No. 46-01318, located in
Harrison County, West Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1700, Oil and gas wells.
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of 30
CFR 75.1700 to permit mining within a 300 feet barrier of slant
directionally drilled (SDD) wells and through coalbed methane (CBM) gas
wells.
The petitioner states that:
(a) The proposed alternative method has been successfully used to
prepare CBM wells for safe intersection by using one or more of the
following methods: cement plug, polymer gel, bentonite gel, active
pressure management and water infusion, and remedial work.
(b) The proposed alternative method will prevent the CBM well
methane from entering the underground mine.
(c) An existing Petition for Modification (Docket No. M-2016-019-C
granted on June 30, 2017) allows the plugging methods outlined in the
proposed alternative method to be used at the Harrison County Mine for
vertical oil and gas wells.
The petitioner proposes the following alternative method:
(a) District Manager approval required:
(1) A minimum working barrier of 300 feet in diameter shall be
maintained around all SDD wells until approval to proceed with mining
has been obtained from the District Manager. This barrier extends
around all vertical and horizontal branches drilled in the coal seam.
This barrier also extends around all vertical and horizontal branches
within overlying coal seams subject to caving or subsidence from the
coal seam being mined when methane leakage through the subsidence zone
is possible.
(2) The District Manager may choose to approve each well or a group
of wells as applicable to the conditions. To prepare the SDD wells for
intersection, the District Manager may require a certified review by a
professional engineer to assess the applicability of the proposed
system(s) to the mine-specific conditions.
(b) Mandatory computations and administrative procedures prior to
plugging or replugging SDD wells after District Manager approval has
been obtained:
(1) Probable Error of Location--Directional drilling systems rely
on sophisticated angular measurement systems and computer models to
calculate the estimated location of the well bore. This estimated hole
location is subject to cumulative measurement errors so that the
distance between actual and estimated location of the well bore
increases with the depth of the hole. Modern directional drilling
systems are typically accurate within one or two degrees depending on
the specific equipment and techniques.
(i) The Probable Error of Location (EE[rho][rho]) is defined by a
cone described by the average accuracy of angular measurement
([alpha][alpha]) around the length of the hole (LLHH), calculated by
the following equation: EE[rho][rho] = LLHH x sin [alpha][alpha]. For
example, mining projected to intersect a well at a point 4,000 feet
from the collar, measured along the well path, would consider a
probable error radius of 69.8 feet about the projected point of
intersection. EE[rho][rho] = 4,000 x sin(1[deg]) = 69.8.
(ii) In addition to the Probable Error of Location, the true point
of intersection may be affected by underground survey errors, surface
survey errors, and survey errors.
(2) Minimum Working Barrier Around Well--The minimum working
barrier around any CBM well or branches of a CBM well in the coal seam
is 50 feet greater than the calculated Probable Error of Location.
(i) For example, mining projected to intersect a well at a point
4,000 feet from the collar, measured along the well path, would
consider a probable error radius of 69.8 feet about the projected point
of intersection. Therefore, the minimum working barrier around this
point of the well bore is 120 feet. The additional 50 feet is a
reasonable
[[Page 53017]]
separation between the probable location of the well and mining
operations.
(ii) When mining is within the minimum working barrier distance
from a CBM well or branch, the operator must comply with the provisions
of the Proposed Decision and Order.
(iii) The District Manager may require a greater minimum working
barrier around CBM wells where geologic conditions, historical location
errors, or other factors warrant a greater barrier.
(3) Ventilation Plan Requirements--The Ventilation Plan shall
identify SDD CBM wells within the active mining area and any projected
mining area as specified in 30 CFR 75.372(b)(14) and, where
intersection is projected, note the well casing type, diameter, and
preparation method for the defined working barrier. If the well has not
been prepared for intersection, the techniques which the operator plans
to implement shall also be included. Actions necessary to implement
such techniques, as well as required operational precautions for mining
within the minimum working barrier shall also be included. Further
operational precautions to be taken when mining within the minimum
working barrier may be required by the District Manager.
(4) Ventilation Map--The ventilation map specified in 30 CFR 75.372
shall contain the following information:
(i) The surface location of all CBM wells in the active mining area
and any projected mining area as specified in 30 CFR 75.372(b)(14);
(ii) Identifying information of CBM wells (American Petroleum
Institute or equivalent);
(iii) The coal seam intersection of all CBM wells;
(iv) The horizontal extents in the coal seam of all CBM wells and
branches;
(v) If intersected, the date of mine intersection and the location
of such intersection relative to the expected point.
(c) Mandatory procedures for plugging or replugging SDD wells:
(1) The operator shall include in the mine ventilation plan one or
more of the following methods specified in sections (c)(3) through
(c)(7) to prepare SDD wells for safe intersection.
(2) The methods approved in the ventilation plan must be completed
on each SDD well before mining encroaches on the minimum working
barrier around the well or branch of the well in the coal seam being
mined. If methane leakage through subsidence cracks is a problem when
retreat mining, the minimum working barrier must be maintained around
wells and branches in overlying coal seams or the wells and branches
must be prepared for safe intersection as specified in the mine
ventilation plan.
(3) Cement Plug--Cement may be used to fill the entire SDD hole
system.
(i) Squeeze cementing techniques are necessary for SDD plugging due
to the lack of tubing in the hole. Cement should fill void spaces and
eliminate methane leakage along the hole. Once the cement has cured,
the SDD system may be intersected multiple times without further hole
preparation.
(ii) Gas cutting occurs if the placement pressure of the cement is
less than the methane pressure in the coal seam. Under these
conditions, gas will bubble out of the coal seam and into the unset
cement creating a pressurized void or a series of interconnected
pressurized voids. Water cutting occurs when formation water and
standing water in the hole invades or displaces the unset cement.
Standing water must be bailed out of the hole or driven into the
formation with compressed gas to minimize water cutting. The cement
pressure must be maintained higher than the formation pressure until
the cement sets to minimize both gas and water cutting. The cementing
program in the ventilation plan must address both gas and water
cutting.
(iii) Due to the large volume to be cemented and potential problems
with cement setting prior to filling the entire SDD system, adequately
sized pumping units with back-up capacity must be used. Various
additives such as retarders, lightweight extenders, viscosity
modifiers, thixotropic modifiers, and fly ash may be used in the cement
mix. The volume of cement pumped should exceed the estimated hole
volume to ensure the complete filling of all voids.
(iv) The complete cementing program, including hole dewatering,
cement, additives, pressures, pumping times and equipment must be
specified in the ventilation plan. The safety data sheets (SDSs) for
all cements, additives, and components and details regarding personal
protective equipment and techniques to protect workers from the
potentially harmful effects of the cement and cement components shall
be included in the ventilation plan.
(v) Records of cement mixes, cement quantities, pump pressures, and
flow rates and times should be retained for each hole plugged. SDD
holes may be plugged with cement years in advance of mining. The
District Manager shall require suitable documentation of the cement
plugging to approve mining within the minimum working barrier around
CBM wells.
(4) Polymer Gel--Polymer gels start out as low viscosity, water-
based mixtures of organic polymers that are crosslinked using time-
delayed activators to form a water-insoluble, high-viscosity gel after
being pumped into the SDD system.
(i) Although polymer gel systems never solidify, the activated gel
should develop sufficient strength to resist gas flow. A gel that is
suitable for treating SDD wells for mine intersection will reliably
fill the SDD system and prevent gas-filled voids. Any gel chemistry
used for plugging SDD wells should be resistant to bacterial and
chemical degradation and remain stable for the duration of mining
through a SDD system.
(ii) Water may dilute the gel mixture to the point where it will
not set to the required strength. Thus, water in the holes must be
removed before injecting the gel mixture. Water removal can be
accomplished by conventional bailing and then injecting compressed gas
to squeeze the water that accumulates in low spots back into the
formation. Gas pressurization should be continued until the hole is
dry.
(iii) Dissolved salts in the formation waters may interfere with
the cross-linking reactions. Any proposed gel mixtures must be tested
with actual formation waters.
(iv) Equipment to mix and pump gels should have adequate capacity
to fill the hole before the gel sets. Back-up units should be available
while pumping.
(v) The volume of gel pumped should exceed the estimated hole
volume to ensure the complete filling of all voids and allow for gel to
infiltrate the joints in the coal seam surrounding the hole. Gel
injection and setting pressures should be specified in the ventilation
plan.
(vi) To reduce the potential for an inundation of gel, the final
level of gel should be close to the level of the coal seam and the
remainder of the hole should remain open to the atmosphere until mining
in the vicinity of the SDD system is completed. Packers may be used to
isolate portions of the SDD system.
(vii) The complete polymer gel program, including the advance
testing of the gel with formation water, dewatering systems, gel
specifications, gel quantities, gel placement, pressures, and pumping
equipment must be specified in the ventilation plan. The SDSs for all
gel components and details regarding personal protective equipment and
techniques to protect workers from the potentially harmful effects of
the gel and gel components shall be included in the ventilation plan. A
record of the
[[Page 53018]]
calculated hole volume, gel quantities, gel formulation, pump
pressures, and flow rates and times should be retained for each hole
that is treated with gel. Other gel chemistries other than organic
polymers may be included in the ventilation plan with appropriate
methods, parameters, and safety precautions.
(5) Bentonite Gel--High-pressure injection of bentonite gel into
the SDD system will infiltrate the cleat and butt joints of the coal
seam near the well bore and effectively seal these conduits against the
flow of methane.
(i) Bentonite gel is a thixotropic fluid that sets when it stops
moving. Bentonite gel has a significantly lower setting viscosity than
polymer gel. While the polymer gel fills and seals the borehole, the
lower strength bentonite gel must penetrate the fractures and jointing
in the coal seam to be effective in reducing formation permeability
around the hole. The use of bentonite gel is restricted to depleted CBM
applications with low abandonment pressures and limited recharge
potential. In general, these applications will be in mature CBM fields
with long production histories.
(ii) A slug of water should be injected prior to the bentonite gel
to minimize moisture-loss bridging near the well bore. The volume of
gel pumped should exceed the estimated hole volume to ensure that the
gel infiltrates the joints in the coal seam for several feet
surrounding the hole. Due to the large gel volume and potential
problems with premature thixotropic setting, adequately sized pumping
units with back-up capacity are required.
(iii) Additives to the gel may be required to modify viscosity,
reduce filtrates, reduce surface tension, and promote sealing of the
cracks and joints around the hole. To reduce the potential for an
inundation of bentonite gel, the final level of gel should be
approximately the elevation of the coal seam and the remainder of the
hole should remain open to the atmosphere until mining in the vicinity
of the SDD system is completed. If a water column is used to pressurize
the gel, it must be bailed down to the coal seam elevation prior to
intersection.
(iv) The complete bentonite gel program, including formation
infiltration and permeability reduction data, hole pretreatment, gel
specifications, additives, gel quantities, flow rates, injection
pressures, and infiltration times, must be specified in the ventilation
plan. The ventilation plan should list the equipment used to prepare
and pump the gel. The SDSs for all gel components and details regarding
personal protective equipment and techniques to protect workers from
the potentially harmful effects of the gel and additives shall be
included in the ventilation plan. A record of hole preparation, gel
quantities, gel formulation, pump pressures, and flow rates and times
should be retained for each hole that is treated with bentonite gel.
(6) Active Pressure Management and Water Infusion--Reducing the
pressure in the hole to less than atmospheric pressure by operating a
vacuum blower connected to the wellhead may facilitate safe
intersection of the hole by a coal mine. The negative pressure in the
hole will limit the quantity of methane released into the higher
pressure mine atmosphere. If the mine intersection is near the end of a
horizontal branch of the SDD system, air will flow from the mine into
the upstream side of the hole and be exhausted through the blower on
the surface. On the downstream side of the intersection, if the open
hole length is short, the methane emitted from this side of the hole
may be diluted to safe levels with ventilation air. Conversely, safely
intersecting this system near the bottom of the vertical hole may not
be possible because the methane emissions from the multiple downstream
branches may be too great to dilute with ventilation air. The methane
emission rate is directly proportional to the length of the open hole.
(i) Successful application of vacuum systems may be limited by
caving of the hole or water collected in dips in the SDD system.
Another important factor in the success of vacuum systems is the
methane liberation rate of the coal formation around the well; older,
more depleted wells that have lower methane emission rates are more
amenable to this technique. The remaining methane content and the
formation permeability shall be addressed in the ventilation plan.
(ii) Packers may be used to reduce methane inflow into the coal
mine after intersection. All packers on the downstream side of the hole
must be equipped with a center pipe so that the inby methane pressure
may be measured or so that water may be injected. Subsequent
intersections shall not take place if pressure in a packer-sealed hole
is excessive.
(iii) Alternatively, methane produced by the downstream hole may be
piped to an in-mine degas system to safely transport the methane out of
the mine or may be piped to the return air course for dilution. In-mine
methane piping shall be protected as stipulated in ``Piping Methane in
Underground Coal Mines,'' MSHA IR1094 (1978). Protected methane
diffusion zones may be established in return air courses if needed.
(iv) Detailed sketches and safety precautions for methane
collection, piping, and diffusion systems must be included in the
ventilation plan per 30 CFR75.371(ee).
(v) Water infusion prior to intersecting the well will temporarily
limit methane flow. Water infusion may also help control coal dust
levels during mining. High water infusion pressures may be obtained
prior to the initial intersection by the hydraulic head resulting from
the hole depth or by pumping. Water infusion pressures for subsequent
intersections are limited by leakage around in-mine packers and
limitations of the mine water distribution system. If water is infused
prior to the initial intersection, the water level in the hole must be
lowered to the coal seam elevation before the intersection.
(vi) The ventilation plan should include/address the following:
(A) The complete pressure management strategy including negative
pressure application, wellhead equipment, use of packers, in-mine
piping, methane dilution, and water infusion.
(B) Procedures for controlling methane in the downstream hole.
(C) Remaining methane content and formation permeability.
(D) Potential for the coal seam to cave into the well.
(E) Dewatering methods.
(F) Record of the negative pressures applied to the system, methane
liberation, use of packers, any water infusion pressures, and
application time should be retained for each intersection.
(7) Remedial work--If problems are encountered in preparing the
holes for safe intersection, remedial measures must be taken to protect
the miners. For example, if only one-half of the calculated hole volume
of cement could be placed into a SDD well due to hole blockage, holes
should be drilled near each branch that will be intersected and squeeze
cemented using pressures sufficient to fracture into the potentially
empty SDD holes. The District Manager approval of the ventilation plan
for remedial +work shall be obtained on a case-by-case basis.
(d) Mandatory procedures after District Manager approval to mine
within the minimum working barrier around the well or branch of the
well:
(1) The operator, the District Manager, the miners' representative,
or the State may request a conference prior to any intersection or
after any intersection to discuss issues or concerns. Upon receipt
[[Page 53019]]
of any such request, the District Manager shall schedule a conference.
The party requesting the conference shall notify all other parties
listed above within a reasonable time prior to the conference to
provide opportunity for participation.
(2) The operator must notify the District Manager, the State, and
the miners' representative at least 48 hours prior to the intended
intersection of any CBM well.
(3) The initial intersection of a well or branch of a well
typically has a higher risk than subsequent intersections and indicates
if the well preparation is sufficient to prevent the inundation of
methane. For the initial intersection of a well or branch, the
following procedures are mandatory:
(i) Entries that will intersect either vertical segments or
branches of a well shall be noted with a readily visible marking that
notes the distance to the well. Such marking shall be located in the
last open crosscut when mining is within 100 feet of the well.
(ii) When a segment of a well will be intersected by a longwall,
drivage sights shall be installed on 10 feet centers starting 50 feet
in advance of the anticipated intersection. Drivage sights shall be
installed in the headgate entry of the longwall and note the shield
number at which the anticipated intersection is expected to occur or
begin in the case of a horizontal branch.
(iii) The operator shall ensure that fire-fighting equipment,
including fire extinguishers, rock dust, and sufficient fire hose to
reach the working face area of the mine-through (when either the
conventional or the continuous mining method is used), is available and
operable during all well mine-throughs. The fire hose shall be located
in the last open crosscut of the entry or room. The operator shall
maintain the water line to the belt conveyor tailpiece along with a
sufficient amount of fire hose to reach the farthest point of
penetration on the section. When the longwall mining method is used, a
hose to the longwall water supply is sufficient. All fire hoses shall
be connected and ready for use, but do not have to be charged with
water, during the cut-through.
(iv) The operator shall ensure that sufficient supplies of roof
support and ventilation materials are available at the working section.
In addition, emergency plugs, packers, and setting tools to seal both
sides of the well or branch shall be available in the immediate area of
the cut-through.
(v) When mining advances within the minimum working barrier
distance from the well or branch of the well, the operator shall
service all equipment and check for permissibility at least once daily.
Daily permissibility examinations must continue until the well or
branch is intersected or until mining exits the minimum working barrier
around the well or branch.
(vi) When mining advances within the minimum working barrier
distance from the well or branch of the well, the operator shall
calibrate the methane monitor(s) on the longwall, continuous mining
machine, or cutting machine and loading machine at least once daily.
Daily methane monitor calibration must continue until the well or
branch is intersected or until mining exits the minimum working barrier
around the well or branch.
(vii) When mining is in progress, the operator shall perform tests
for methane with a handheld methane detector at least every 10 minutes
from when the mining with the continuous mining machine or longwall
face is within the minimum working barrier around the well or branch.
During the cutting process, no individual shall be allowed on the
return side until the mine-through has been completed and the area has
been examined and declared safe. The shearer must be idle when any
miners are inby the tail drum.
(viii) When using continuous or conventional mining methods, the
working place shall be free from accumulations of coal dust and coal
spillages, and rock dust shall be placed on the roof, rib, and floor
within 20 feet of the face when mining through the well or branch. On
longwall sections, rock dust shall be applied on the roof, rib, and
floor up to both the headgate and tailgate pillared area.
(ix) Immediately after the well or branch is intersected, the
operator shall de-energize all equipment, and the certified person
shall thoroughly examine and determine the working place safe before
mining is resumed.
(x) After a well or branch has been intersected and the working
place determined safe, mining shall continue in by the well at a
sufficient distance to permit adequate ventilation around the area of
the well or branch.
(xi) No open flame shall be permitted in the area until adequate
ventilation has been established around the well bore or branch. Any
casing, tubing, or stuck tools will be removed using the methods
approved in the ventilation plan.
(xii) No person except those directly engaged in the operation
shall be permitted in the working place of the mine-through operation
during active mining.
(xiii) The operator shall warn all personnel directly engaged in
the operation of the planned intersection of the well or branch prior
to going underground if the intersection is to occur during their
shift.
(xiv) The mine-through operation shall be under the direct
supervision of a certified person. Instructions concerning the mine-
through operation shall be issued only by the certified person in
charge.
(xv) All miners shall be in known locations and stay in
communication with the responsible person, in accordance with the site-
specific approved Emergency Response Plan, when active mining occurs
within the minimum working barrier of the well or branch.
(xvi) The responsible person required under 30 CFR 75.1501 is
responsible for well intersection emergencies. The well intersection
procedures must be reviewed by the responsible person prior to any
planned intersection.
(xvii) A copy of the Decision and Order shall be maintained at the
mine and be available to the miners.
(xviii) The provisions of the Decision and Order do not impair the
authority of representatives of MSHA to interrupt or halt the mine
through operation and to issue a withdrawal order when they deem it
necessary for the safety of the miners. MSHA may order an interruption
or cessation of the mine-through operation and/or a withdrawal of
personnel by issuing either an oral or a written order to a
representative of the operator, which shall include the basis for the
order. Operations in the affected area of the mine may not resume until
a representative of MSHA permits resumption of mine-through operations.
The operator and miners shall comply with verbal or written MSHA orders
immediately. All oral orders shall be committed to writing within a
reasonable time as conditions permit.
(xix) For subsequent intersections of branches of a well,
appropriate procedures to protect the miners shall be specified in the
ventilation plan.
(e) Mandatory procedures after SDD intersections:
(1) All intersections with SDD wells and branches that are in
intake air courses shall be examined as part of the pre-shift
examinations required under 30 CFR 75.360.
(2) All other intersections with SDD wells and branches shall be
examined as part of the weekly examinations required under 30 CFR
75.364.
(f) Other requirements:
(1) A minimum working barrier of 300 feet in diameter shall be
maintained around all SDD wells until the operator submits proposed
revisions for its approved 30 CFR part 48 training plan
[[Page 53020]]
to the District Manager. These proposed revisions shall include initial
and refresher training regarding compliance with the terms and
conditions stated in the Decision and Order. The operator shall provide
all miners involved in the mine-through of a well or branch with
training regarding the requirements of the Decision and Order prior to
mining within the minimum working barrier of the next well or branch
intended to be mined through.
(2) A minimum working barrier of 300 feet in diameter shall be
maintained around all SDD wells until the operator has submitted
proposed revisions for its approved mine emergency evacuation and
firefighting program of instruction required by 30 CFR 75.1502. The
operator shall revise the program to include the hazards and evacuation
procedures to be used for well intersections. All underground miners
shall be trained in this revised program according to the revised mine
emergency evacuation and firefighting program of instruction prior to
mining within the minimum working barrier.
The petitioner asserts that the alternative method proposed will at
all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection
afforded the miners under the mandatory standard.
Song-ae Aromie Noe,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2022-18618 Filed 8-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520-43-P