Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 6.64P-O, 51181-51184 [2022-17830]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 160 / Friday, August 19, 2022 / Notices
interested in responses to the following
questions:
1. Background information: Please
describe the role that you/your
organization has in meteorological
services. If relevant, please describe
how you/your organization engages
with underserved communities.
2. Engagement with the Federal
Government: Has your organization
successfully collaborated with the U.S.
Federal Government on meteorological
services in the past? If successful, please
describe what you think contributed to
this success (e.g., the partners involved,
the partners’ roles, the scope/time
period of the collaboration). If relevant,
please describe any metrics used to
evaluate the success of this engagement.
If engagement and collaboration did not
work, why not? (e.g., legal, regulatory,
or policy requirements; differences in
work culture; lack of expertise; or any
other hurdles that limited or otherwise
prevented effective collaboration with
Federal meteorological services.)
3. Facilitation by the Federal
Government: Besides ICAMS, are you
aware of other existing Federal
coordination bodies that can strengthen
or facilitate collaboration and/or address
barriers and gaps in the advancement of
meteorological services?
4. Prioritizing Existing Activities: Are
there any specific meteorological
services that you think are currently
only partially met by the Federal
Government? Are there any that are
currently completely unmet? How
would you/your organization benefit
from the prioritization of these services
or the activities that advance them?
5. Future Opportunities for the
Federal Government: What future
services and activities do you think the
Federal Government should prioritize
(please provide what you see as the top
three opportunities for the Federal
Government) over the next 10 years?
What goals would this prioritization
help you achieve? Of the opportunities
you presented, please identify if any of
them can be addressed in the next 2–3
years under existing programs, or if they
are longer-term initiatives and
strategies. And if relevant, please
classify these opportunities into any of
the following broad categories:
observational systems; cyber, facilities,
and infrastructure; research and
innovation; and other cross-cutting
issues. Please indicate whether there are
U.S. Federal agencies/organizations that
should be specifically included in those
opportunities.
6. International Activities: How do
U.S. capabilities in meteorological
services compare to services provided
by other countries? Are there
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
meteorological services that other
governments provide that the Federal
Government should also provide? Are
there international partners that the
United States should be working with
that the Federal Government is not
working with currently?
7. Additional Comments: Please
provide any other input that you believe
is pertinent to this RFI, within the page
limit.
Dated: August 16, 2022.
Stacy Murphy,
Operations Manager.
[FR Doc. 2022–17894 Filed 8–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3270–F2–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–95501; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2022–52]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Rule 6.64P–O
August 15, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on August
9, 2022, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6.64P–O (Auction Process). The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
51181
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify
Rule 6.64P–O (Auction Process)
regarding the handling of certain Market
Maker quotations and order instructions
related thereto as set forth below.
Overview
On July 11, 2022, the Exchange began
migrating symbols from its existing
trading platform to the Pillar trading
platform,4 As of July 28, 2022, all
symbols have been migrated to the Pillar
platform.5 Since migrating to Pillar, the
Exchange has encountered unexpected
processing of certain Market Maker
quotations and related (subsequent)
‘‘order instructions’’ to update such
quotations during the abbreviated time
period of the Auction Processing Period
and transition to continuous trading
(i.e., generally measured in fractions of
a second) when the Exchange conducts
its opening (or reopening) Auction and
transitions a series from pre-open state
to continuous trading.6 The Exchange
believes that, as a result of this
unexpected processing during this very
brief period, Market Makers may be
unable to determine their potential
exposure (and thus be at risk for
unexpected executions). To prevent this
risk to Market Makers, the Exchange
updated the treatment of this quoting
interest during these discrete periods,
which was announced by a Trader
Update (the ‘‘Trader Update’’).7
4 The Exchange announced the July 11th launch
date, as well as the schedule for symbol migration
in five tranches, via Trader Update, available here:
https://www.nyse.com/trader-update/
history#110000436694.
5 The Exchange announced the migration of the
fifth and final tranche of symbols to the Pillar
trading platform, via Trader Update, available here:
https://www.nyse.com/trader-update/
history#110000440092.
6 Because the opening and reopening process is
identical, the Exchange will refer to both processes,
collectively, as the ‘‘opening.’’
7 The Exchange announced via Trader Update
that, effective July 29, 2022, ‘‘[d]uring Auction
Processing Period or during the transition to
continuous trading, any new quotes will be rejected
and, if the Exchange receives order instructions for
an existing quote, the Exchange will cancel any
same-side quotes sent from the same order/quote
Continued
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
51182
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 160 / Friday, August 19, 2022 / Notices
The Exchange proposes to modify
Rule 6.64P–O to codify the updated
treatment of this quoting interest (as
announced in the Trader Update) to
ensure efficient and consistent handling
of Market Maker quotations (and related
order instructions).8 The Exchange
believes the proposed rule change
would provide more certainty as to the
handling of certain quoting interest
during the brief Auction Processing
Period and transition to continuous
trading.
Current Rule
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Rule 6.64P–O (the ‘‘Rule’’) covers the
entire Auction Process for opening
option series, which Process begins
when the Exchange receives an Auction
Trigger for a series and ends when the
Auction is conducted.9 The Auction
Processing Period is the time during
which the Auction is being processed
and concludes when the Exchange
transitions to continuous trading.10
Paragraphs (e) and (f) to the Rule
describe how the Exchange handles
interest during this brief period (as
described below), which is typically
measured in fractions of a second.
Rule 6.64P–O(e) describes the
Exchange’s handling of interest that
arrives during the Auction Processing
Period, i.e., new quote and order
messages, as well as ‘‘order
instructions,’’ such as requests to
cancel, cancel/replace, or otherwise
modify, an existing order or quote. By
Rule, the Exchange will accept new
order and quote messages during the
Auction Processing Period, but such
messages will not be processed until
after this Period.11 In addition, an order
instruction that arrives during the
Auction Processing Period will not be
processed until after this Period if the
order instruction relates to an order or
quote that was received before the
Auction Processing Period; further, any
subsequent order instructions relating to
entry port of that Market Maker,’’ available here:
https://www.nyse.com/trader-update/
history#110000441036. The aforementioned change
was made in the interest of maintaining a fair and
orderly market consistent with Rule 6.64P–O(d)(5).
See id.
8 For the avoidance of doubt, this proposal does
not modify the Exchange’s handling or processing
of orders (or order instructions related thereto)
pursuant to Rule 6.64P–O.
9 See Rule 6.64P–O(a)(5). An Auction Trigger
refers to information disseminated by the Primary
Market in the underlying security that triggers the
Auction Process for a series to begin. See also Rule
6.64P–O(a)(7).
10 See Rule 6.64P–O(a)(6). See also Rule 6.64P–
O(a)(12) (A) and (B), respectively (defining pre-open
state, including that for a Core Open Auction and
a Trading Halt Auction, the pre-open state ends
when the Auction Processing Period begins).
11 See Rule 6.64P–O(e).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
such order will be rejected.12 As noted
above, the Auction Processing Period
concludes when the Auction is
conducted and the Exchange transitions
to continuous trading.
Under the current Rule 6.64P–O(f),
regarding the transition to continuous
trading, the Exchange processes order
instructions related to each order and
quote, in time sequence (per paragraphs
(f)(3)(A) or (B) of this Rule), if such
order instruction relates to an order or
quote that was received before the
Auction Processing Period; or relates to
a series that has already transitioned to
continuous trading and the order
instruction arrives during either the
transition to continuous trading or the
Auction Processing Period (per
paragraph (e)(1)).13 And, any
subsequent order instructions relating to
such order or quote is rejected.14
Finally, Rule 6.64P–O(f)(2)(B) provides
that an order instruction that arrives
during the transition to continuous
trading will be processed on arrival if it
relates to an order or quote that was
entered during either the Auction
Processing Period or the transition to
continuous trading and such order or
quote has not yet transitioned to
continuous trading.15
Proposed Rule Change
As noted above, since the migration to
Pillar, the Exchange has encountered
unexpected processing of certain Market
Maker quotations and related
(subsequent) ‘‘order instructions’’ to
update such quotations during the
Auction Processing Period and as the
Exchange transitions to continuous
trading. To address this issue, the
Exchange proposes to modify its
handling of such quoting interest during
these discrete time periods as set forth
in paragraphs (e) (Order Processing
during an Auction Processing Period)
and (f) (Transition to Continuous
Trading) of Rule 6.64P–O.
First, the Exchange proposes to revise
Rule 6.64P–O(e) to specify that
‘‘[d]uring the Auction Processing
Period, the Exchange will reject new
quotes and, if the Exchange receives
order instructions for existing quotes,
the Exchange will cancel any same-side
quotes sent from the same order/quote
entry port of that Market Maker.’’ 16 The
12 See Rule 6.64P–O(e)(1). Rule 6.64P–O(e)(2),
which is not being modified by this rule change,
provides that ‘‘[a]n order instruction that arrives
during the Auction Processing Period will be
processed on arrival if it relates to an order that was
received during the Auction Processing Period.’’
13 See Rule 6.64P–O(f)(2)(A).
14 See Rule 6.64P–O(f)(2)(A).
15 See Rule 6.64P–O(f)(2)(B).
16 See proposed Rule 6.64P–O(e).
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange believes that this proposed
change in the treatment of this interest
would allow for more deterministic
handling of order instructions for
quotes. In addition, by cancelling any
same-side quotes of that Market Maker,
the Exchange would eliminate
potentially unexpected exposure (or
executions) for that Market Maker.
Next, the Exchange proposes to
reorganize the text of Rule 6.64P–O(e) to
make clear that ‘‘[d]uring the Auction
Processing Period, new orders will be
accepted but will not be processed until
after the Auction Processing Period and
order instructions for existing orders
will be processed as follows:’’ 17
Consistent with the foregoing, the
Exchange proposes to modify Rule
6.64P–O(e)(1) to remove reference to
quotes (as this handling is covered in
proposed paragraph (e) to the Rule), and
to clarify the rule text (consistent with
current functionality) that subsequent
order instructions related to an existing
order would be rejected ‘‘when a prior
order instruction is pending.’’ 18
Further, and consistent with the
foregoing, the Exchange proposes to
modify Rule 6.64P–O(f)(2) to specify
that during the transition to continuous
trading, ‘‘the Exchange will reject new
quotes and, if the Exchange receives
order instructions for existing quotes,
the Exchange will cancel any same-side
quotes sent from the same order/quote
entry port of that Market Maker.’’ 19 As
noted above, the Exchange believes that
this proposed treatment would allow for
more deterministic handling of order
instructions for quotes. Further, by
cancelling any same-side quotes of that
Market Maker, the Exchange would
eliminate potentially unexpected
exposure (or executions) for that Market
Maker.
In addition, proposed Rule 6.64P–
O(f)(2)(A) and (B) would remove
reference to quotes (as this handling is
covered in proposed paragraph (f)(2) of
the Rule), and proposed Rule 6.64P–
O(f)(2)(A) would clarify the rule text
(consistent with current functionality)
that subsequent order instructions
related to an existing order would be
rejected ‘‘when a prior order instruction
is pending.’’ 20 The Exchange also
proposes to remove as superfluous the
unnecessary reference in paragraph
(f)(2)(A) of the Rule to ‘‘under paragraph
17 See proposed Rule 6.64P–O(e). The Exchange
notes that the textual change proposed is
substantively identical to the first sentence to Rule
6.64P–O(e), except that the proposed sentence
omits reference to quotes and clarifies that the order
instructions relate to ‘‘existing orders.’’ See id.
18 See proposed Rule 6.64P–O(e)(1).
19 See proposed Rule 6.64P–O(f)(2).
20 See proposed Rule 6.64P–O(f)(2)(A) and (B).
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 160 / Friday, August 19, 2022 / Notices
(e)(1),’’which immediately follows ‘‘the
Auction Processing Period.’’ 21 Finally,
in paragraph (f)(3)(C) of the Rule, which
specifies the treatment of quotes that
were received during the Auction
Processing Period, the Exchange
proposes to remove such references to
quotes as unnecessary to conform with
the foregoing proposed changes (i.e.,
which state that any such quotes would
be rejected).22 The Exchange believes
these proposed non-substantive changes
would add clarity, transparency and
internal consistency to Exchange rules.
Makers, which would remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
Finally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed clarifying changes,
including non-substantive conforming
changes, would promote transparency
and internal consistency within
Exchange rules making them easier to
comprehend and navigate.26
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),23 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),24 in
particular, because it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
Overall, the Exchange believes the
proposed change would promote a fair
and orderly market because it would
address, in a timely manner, the
unexpected issue regarding the
processing of certain Market Maker
quotations and (subsequent) order
instructions to update such quotations,
which issue came to light as the
Exchange began migrating symbols to
Pillar for options trading.25 The
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change would promote just and
equitable principles of trade because the
proposal would provide Market Makers
greater determinism and certainty about
how quotes (and order instructions
related thereto) are handled during the
abbreviated period that the Exchange
conducts the opening Auction and
transitions to continuous trading.
Further, the proposed rule change
would allow for the efficient and
consistent handling of such quotes and
would reduce the potential unexpected
exposure (or executions) for Market
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
21 See Rule 6.64P–O(f)(2)(B). The Exchange does
not believe the extraneous reference paragraph
(e)(1) of the Rule adds substance to this provision
and is therefore distracting and potentially
confusing to market participants.
22 See proposed Rule 6.64P–O(f)(3)(C). See also
proposed Rule 6.64P–O(e).
23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
24 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
25 See supra note 7, Trader Update.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed change is not designed to be
competitive but is instead designed to
address an unexpected issue regarding
the processing of Market Maker
quotations (and subsequent order
instructions related thereto) that arose
in connection with the Exchange’s
migration to its Pillar trading platform.
The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change would impose any
burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the Act because the
proposed change would apply equally
to all similarly-situated Market Makers.
Rather, the Exchange believes that by
adding certainty to a Market Maker’s
exposure for quoting interest received
during the Auction Processing Period
and transition to continuous trading, the
proposed change may incent Market
Makers to more readily participate in
the opening process, which may in turn
improve liquidity and price discovery to
the benefit of all market participants.
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change would impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because it is designed to efficiently
handle certain Market Maker quotations
and certain order instructions related
thereto and to promote the opening (or
reopening) of option series on the
Exchange in a fair and orderly manner.
Additionally, the clarifying changes,
including non-substantive conforming
changes proposed by the Exchange
provide additional clarity and detail in
the Exchange’s rules and are not
changes made for any competitive
purpose.
26 See,
PO 00000
e.g., supra notes 17, 18, 20–23.
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51183
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 27 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.28 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 29 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),30 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing. The proposed
rule change would address an
unexpected issue regarding the
processing of certain Market Maker
quotations and subsequent order
instructions to update such quotations,
which issue the Exchange states came to
light as the Exchange began migrating
symbols to Pillar for options trading.
The Exchange represents that
implementing the proposed rule change
without delay would address that
unexpected issue by aligning the
Exchange’s rule with the technology
change deployed as of July 29, 2022
regarding how new quote messages and
order instructions related to such
quotations would be processed once the
Auction Processing Period for an option
series commences. Moreover, the
Exchange represents that implementing
this change without delay would allow
the Rule to reflect the more
deterministic handling and processing
27 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
29 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
30 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
28 17
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
51184
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 160 / Friday, August 19, 2022 / Notices
of quotes (and subsequent instructions
related thereto), which would, in turn,
eliminate potentially unexpected
exposure (or executions) for Market
Makers. For these reasons, and based on
the representations of the Exchange, the
Commission believes that waiver of the
30-day operative delay for this proposal
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.
Accordingly, the Commission hereby
waives the 30-day operative delay and
designates the proposal operative upon
filing.31
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 32 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2022–52 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to: Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2022–52. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
31 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule change’s impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
32 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Aug 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2022–52 and
should be submitted on or before
September 9, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division
of Trading and Markets, pursuant to
delegated authority.33
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–17830 Filed 8–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
Administrator’s EIDL declaration,
applications for economic injury
disaster loans may be filed at the
address listed above or other locally
announced locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties: Miami-Dade.
Contiguous Counties:
Florida: Broward, Collier, Monroe.
The Interest Rates are:
Percent
Businesses and Small Agricultural
Cooperatives without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..................
Non-Profit Organizations without
Credit Available Elsewhere .......
2.935
1.875
The number assigned to this disaster
for economic injury is 175710.
The State which received an EIDL
Declaration #17571 is Florida.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022–17829 Filed 8–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026–09–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #17571; FLORIDA
Disaster Number FL–00175 Declaration of
Economic Injury]
Administrative Declaration of an
Economic Injury Disaster for the State
of Florida
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
33 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Public Notice: 11825]
Notice of Determinations; Culturally
Significant Object Being Imported for
Storage and Exhibition—
Determinations: ‘‘Ancestor (Uli) Figure’’
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: I hereby
determine that a certain object being
imported from abroad pursuant to an
agreement with its foreign owner or
custodian for temporary storage and
exhibition or display in the Oceania
Gallery of The Metropolitan Museum of
Art, New York, New York, and at
possible additional exhibitions or
venues yet to be determined, is of
cultural significance, and, further, that
its temporary storage and exhibition or
display within the United States as
aforementioned is in the national
interest. I have ordered that Public
Notice of these determinations be
published in the Federal Register.
SUMMARY:
This is a notice of an
Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL)
declaration for the State of Florida dated
08/15/2022.
Incident: Tropicana Flea Market Fire.
Incident Period: 07/07/2022.
DATES: Issued on 08/15/2022.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 05/15/2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 160 (Friday, August 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51181-51184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17830]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-95501; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2022-52]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule
6.64P-O
August 15, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on August 9, 2022, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.64P-O (Auction Process). The
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 6.64P-O (Auction Process)
regarding the handling of certain Market Maker quotations and order
instructions related thereto as set forth below.
Overview
On July 11, 2022, the Exchange began migrating symbols from its
existing trading platform to the Pillar trading platform,\4\ As of July
28, 2022, all symbols have been migrated to the Pillar platform.\5\
Since migrating to Pillar, the Exchange has encountered unexpected
processing of certain Market Maker quotations and related (subsequent)
``order instructions'' to update such quotations during the abbreviated
time period of the Auction Processing Period and transition to
continuous trading (i.e., generally measured in fractions of a second)
when the Exchange conducts its opening (or reopening) Auction and
transitions a series from pre-open state to continuous trading.\6\ The
Exchange believes that, as a result of this unexpected processing
during this very brief period, Market Makers may be unable to determine
their potential exposure (and thus be at risk for unexpected
executions). To prevent this risk to Market Makers, the Exchange
updated the treatment of this quoting interest during these discrete
periods, which was announced by a Trader Update (the ``Trader
Update'').\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange announced the July 11th launch date, as well as
the schedule for symbol migration in five tranches, via Trader
Update, available here: https://www.nyse.com/trader-update/history#110000436694.
\5\ The Exchange announced the migration of the fifth and final
tranche of symbols to the Pillar trading platform, via Trader
Update, available here: https://www.nyse.com/trader-update/history#110000440092.
\6\ Because the opening and reopening process is identical, the
Exchange will refer to both processes, collectively, as the
``opening.''
\7\ The Exchange announced via Trader Update that, effective
July 29, 2022, ``[d]uring Auction Processing Period or during the
transition to continuous trading, any new quotes will be rejected
and, if the Exchange receives order instructions for an existing
quote, the Exchange will cancel any same-side quotes sent from the
same order/quote entry port of that Market Maker,'' available here:
https://www.nyse.com/trader-update/history#110000441036. The
aforementioned change was made in the interest of maintaining a fair
and orderly market consistent with Rule 6.64P-O(d)(5). See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 51182]]
The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 6.64P-O to codify the updated
treatment of this quoting interest (as announced in the Trader Update)
to ensure efficient and consistent handling of Market Maker quotations
(and related order instructions).\8\ The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change would provide more certainty as to the handling of certain
quoting interest during the brief Auction Processing Period and
transition to continuous trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For the avoidance of doubt, this proposal does not modify
the Exchange's handling or processing of orders (or order
instructions related thereto) pursuant to Rule 6.64P-O.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Rule
Rule 6.64P-O (the ``Rule'') covers the entire Auction Process for
opening option series, which Process begins when the Exchange receives
an Auction Trigger for a series and ends when the Auction is
conducted.\9\ The Auction Processing Period is the time during which
the Auction is being processed and concludes when the Exchange
transitions to continuous trading.\10\ Paragraphs (e) and (f) to the
Rule describe how the Exchange handles interest during this brief
period (as described below), which is typically measured in fractions
of a second.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Rule 6.64P-O(a)(5). An Auction Trigger refers to
information disseminated by the Primary Market in the underlying
security that triggers the Auction Process for a series to begin.
See also Rule 6.64P-O(a)(7).
\10\ See Rule 6.64P-O(a)(6). See also Rule 6.64P-O(a)(12) (A)
and (B), respectively (defining pre-open state, including that for a
Core Open Auction and a Trading Halt Auction, the pre-open state
ends when the Auction Processing Period begins).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 6.64P-O(e) describes the Exchange's handling of interest that
arrives during the Auction Processing Period, i.e., new quote and order
messages, as well as ``order instructions,'' such as requests to
cancel, cancel/replace, or otherwise modify, an existing order or
quote. By Rule, the Exchange will accept new order and quote messages
during the Auction Processing Period, but such messages will not be
processed until after this Period.\11\ In addition, an order
instruction that arrives during the Auction Processing Period will not
be processed until after this Period if the order instruction relates
to an order or quote that was received before the Auction Processing
Period; further, any subsequent order instructions relating to such
order will be rejected.\12\ As noted above, the Auction Processing
Period concludes when the Auction is conducted and the Exchange
transitions to continuous trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Rule 6.64P-O(e).
\12\ See Rule 6.64P-O(e)(1). Rule 6.64P-O(e)(2), which is not
being modified by this rule change, provides that ``[a]n order
instruction that arrives during the Auction Processing Period will
be processed on arrival if it relates to an order that was received
during the Auction Processing Period.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the current Rule 6.64P-O(f), regarding the transition to
continuous trading, the Exchange processes order instructions related
to each order and quote, in time sequence (per paragraphs (f)(3)(A) or
(B) of this Rule), if such order instruction relates to an order or
quote that was received before the Auction Processing Period; or
relates to a series that has already transitioned to continuous trading
and the order instruction arrives during either the transition to
continuous trading or the Auction Processing Period (per paragraph
(e)(1)).\13\ And, any subsequent order instructions relating to such
order or quote is rejected.\14\ Finally, Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2)(B) provides
that an order instruction that arrives during the transition to
continuous trading will be processed on arrival if it relates to an
order or quote that was entered during either the Auction Processing
Period or the transition to continuous trading and such order or quote
has not yet transitioned to continuous trading.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2)(A).
\14\ See Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2)(A).
\15\ See Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Change
As noted above, since the migration to Pillar, the Exchange has
encountered unexpected processing of certain Market Maker quotations
and related (subsequent) ``order instructions'' to update such
quotations during the Auction Processing Period and as the Exchange
transitions to continuous trading. To address this issue, the Exchange
proposes to modify its handling of such quoting interest during these
discrete time periods as set forth in paragraphs (e) (Order Processing
during an Auction Processing Period) and (f) (Transition to Continuous
Trading) of Rule 6.64P-O.
First, the Exchange proposes to revise Rule 6.64P-O(e) to specify
that ``[d]uring the Auction Processing Period, the Exchange will reject
new quotes and, if the Exchange receives order instructions for
existing quotes, the Exchange will cancel any same-side quotes sent
from the same order/quote entry port of that Market Maker.'' \16\ The
Exchange believes that this proposed change in the treatment of this
interest would allow for more deterministic handling of order
instructions for quotes. In addition, by cancelling any same-side
quotes of that Market Maker, the Exchange would eliminate potentially
unexpected exposure (or executions) for that Market Maker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See proposed Rule 6.64P-O(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next, the Exchange proposes to reorganize the text of Rule 6.64P-
O(e) to make clear that ``[d]uring the Auction Processing Period, new
orders will be accepted but will not be processed until after the
Auction Processing Period and order instructions for existing orders
will be processed as follows:'' \17\ Consistent with the foregoing, the
Exchange proposes to modify Rule 6.64P-O(e)(1) to remove reference to
quotes (as this handling is covered in proposed paragraph (e) to the
Rule), and to clarify the rule text (consistent with current
functionality) that subsequent order instructions related to an
existing order would be rejected ``when a prior order instruction is
pending.'' \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See proposed Rule 6.64P-O(e). The Exchange notes that the
textual change proposed is substantively identical to the first
sentence to Rule 6.64P-O(e), except that the proposed sentence omits
reference to quotes and clarifies that the order instructions relate
to ``existing orders.'' See id.
\18\ See proposed Rule 6.64P-O(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, and consistent with the foregoing, the Exchange proposes
to modify Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2) to specify that during the transition to
continuous trading, ``the Exchange will reject new quotes and, if the
Exchange receives order instructions for existing quotes, the Exchange
will cancel any same-side quotes sent from the same order/quote entry
port of that Market Maker.'' \19\ As noted above, the Exchange believes
that this proposed treatment would allow for more deterministic
handling of order instructions for quotes. Further, by cancelling any
same-side quotes of that Market Maker, the Exchange would eliminate
potentially unexpected exposure (or executions) for that Market Maker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See proposed Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, proposed Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2)(A) and (B) would remove
reference to quotes (as this handling is covered in proposed paragraph
(f)(2) of the Rule), and proposed Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2)(A) would clarify
the rule text (consistent with current functionality) that subsequent
order instructions related to an existing order would be rejected
``when a prior order instruction is pending.'' \20\ The Exchange also
proposes to remove as superfluous the unnecessary reference in
paragraph (f)(2)(A) of the Rule to ``under paragraph
[[Page 51183]]
(e)(1),''which immediately follows ``the Auction Processing Period.''
\21\ Finally, in paragraph (f)(3)(C) of the Rule, which specifies the
treatment of quotes that were received during the Auction Processing
Period, the Exchange proposes to remove such references to quotes as
unnecessary to conform with the foregoing proposed changes (i.e., which
state that any such quotes would be rejected).\22\ The Exchange
believes these proposed non-substantive changes would add clarity,
transparency and internal consistency to Exchange rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See proposed Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2)(A) and (B).
\21\ See Rule 6.64P-O(f)(2)(B). The Exchange does not believe
the extraneous reference paragraph (e)(1) of the Rule adds substance
to this provision and is therefore distracting and potentially
confusing to market participants.
\22\ See proposed Rule 6.64P-O(f)(3)(C). See also proposed Rule
6.64P-O(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\23\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\24\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall, the Exchange believes the proposed change would promote a
fair and orderly market because it would address, in a timely manner,
the unexpected issue regarding the processing of certain Market Maker
quotations and (subsequent) order instructions to update such
quotations, which issue came to light as the Exchange began migrating
symbols to Pillar for options trading.\25\ The Exchange believes the
proposed rule change would promote just and equitable principles of
trade because the proposal would provide Market Makers greater
determinism and certainty about how quotes (and order instructions
related thereto) are handled during the abbreviated period that the
Exchange conducts the opening Auction and transitions to continuous
trading. Further, the proposed rule change would allow for the
efficient and consistent handling of such quotes and would reduce the
potential unexpected exposure (or executions) for Market Makers, which
would remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and
open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See supra note 7, Trader Update.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed clarifying
changes, including non-substantive conforming changes, would promote
transparency and internal consistency within Exchange rules making them
easier to comprehend and navigate.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See, e.g., supra notes 17, 18, 20-23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not
designed to be competitive but is instead designed to address an
unexpected issue regarding the processing of Market Maker quotations
(and subsequent order instructions related thereto) that arose in
connection with the Exchange's migration to its Pillar trading
platform. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change
would impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the Act because the proposed
change would apply equally to all similarly-situated Market Makers.
Rather, the Exchange believes that by adding certainty to a Market
Maker's exposure for quoting interest received during the Auction
Processing Period and transition to continuous trading, the proposed
change may incent Market Makers to more readily participate in the
opening process, which may in turn improve liquidity and price
discovery to the benefit of all market participants.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because it is
designed to efficiently handle certain Market Maker quotations and
certain order instructions related thereto and to promote the opening
(or reopening) of option series on the Exchange in a fair and orderly
manner.
Additionally, the clarifying changes, including non-substantive
conforming changes proposed by the Exchange provide additional clarity
and detail in the Exchange's rules and are not changes made for any
competitive purpose.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \27\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\28\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\28\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \29\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\30\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The proposed rule change
would address an unexpected issue regarding the processing of certain
Market Maker quotations and subsequent order instructions to update
such quotations, which issue the Exchange states came to light as the
Exchange began migrating symbols to Pillar for options trading. The
Exchange represents that implementing the proposed rule change without
delay would address that unexpected issue by aligning the Exchange's
rule with the technology change deployed as of July 29, 2022 regarding
how new quote messages and order instructions related to such
quotations would be processed once the Auction Processing Period for an
option series commences. Moreover, the Exchange represents that
implementing this change without delay would allow the Rule to reflect
the more deterministic handling and processing
[[Page 51184]]
of quotes (and subsequent instructions related thereto), which would,
in turn, eliminate potentially unexpected exposure (or executions) for
Market Makers. For these reasons, and based on the representations of
the Exchange, the Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day
operative delay for this proposal is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission hereby
waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposal operative
upon filing.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\30\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\31\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule change's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \32\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2022-52 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2022-52. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2022-52 and should be submitted
on or before September 9, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17830 Filed 8-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P