Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 7, Section 4, 50652-50654 [2022-17669]
Download as PDF
50652
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2022 / Notices
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2022–35. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2022–35 and should
be submitted on or before September 7,
2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.43
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–17663 Filed 8–16–22; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
JSPEARS on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Options 7,
Section 4
August 11, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Aug 16, 2022
Jkt 256001
The Exchange proposes to amend
Phlx’s Pricing Schedule at Options 7,
Section 4, ‘‘Multiply Listed Options
Fees (Includes options overlying
equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes which
are Multiply Listed) (Excludes SPY and
broad-based index options symbols
listed within Options 7, Section 5.A).’’
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/phlx/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–95479; File No. SR–Phlx–
2022–33]
1 15
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
43 17
notice is hereby given that on August 1,
2022, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
Phlx proposes to amend its Pricing
Schedule at Options 7, Section 4,
‘‘Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes
options overlying equities, ETFs, ETNs
and indexes which are Multiply Listed)
(Excludes SPY and broad-based index
options symbols listed within Options
7, Section 5.A).’’ Specifically, Phlx
proposes to remove the maximum
Qualified Contingent Cross (‘‘QCC’’)
rebate that will be paid by the Exchange
in a given month. The Exchange
believes that removing this rebate will
permit Phlx to compete more effectively
with other options exchange for QCC
Orders by incentivizing market
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
participants to transact a greater amount
of QCC Orders on Phlx in order to
receive a QCC Rebate.3
Today, the Exchange assesses a $.20
per contract QCC Transaction Fee for a
Lead Market Maker,4 Market Maker,5
Firm 6 and Broker-Dealer.7 Customers 8
and Professionals 9 are not assessed a
QCC Transaction Fee. QCC Transaction
Fees apply to electronic QCC Orders 10
and Floor QCC Orders.11 Rebates are
paid on all qualifying executed
electronic QCC Orders and Floor QCC
Orders based on the following six tier
rebate schedule:12
3 Phlx will monitor the impact of this proposal on
QCC Order volumes, and may in the future impose
a maximum on the amount of QCC Rebate it would
pay to members and member organizations that
execute qualifying QCC Orders.
4 The term ‘‘Lead Market Maker’’ applies to
transactions for the account of a Lead Market Maker
(as defined in Options 2, Section 12(a)). A Lead
Market Maker is an Exchange member who is
registered as an options Lead Market Maker
pursuant to Options 2, Section 12(a). An options
Lead Market Maker includes a Remote Lead Market
Maker which is defined as an options Lead Market
Maker in one or more classes that does not have a
physical presence on an Exchange floor and is
approved by the Exchange pursuant to Options 2,
Section 11. See Options 7, Section 1(c). The term
‘‘Floor Lead Market Maker’’ is a member who is
registered as an options Lead Market Maker
pursuant to Options 2, Section 12(a) and has a
physical presence on the Exchange’s trading floor.
See Options 8, Section 2(a)(3).
5 The term ‘‘Market Maker’’ is defined in Options
1, Section 1(b)(28) as a member of the Exchange
who is registered as an options Market Maker
pursuant to Options 2, Section 12(a). A Market
Maker includes SQTs and RSQTs as well as Floor
Market Makers. See Options 7, Section 1(c). The
term ‘‘Floor Market Maker’’ is a Market Maker who
is neither an SQT or an RSQT. A Floor Market
Maker may provide a quote in open outcry. See
Options 8, Section 2(a)(4).
6 The term ‘‘Firm’’ applies to any transaction that
is identified by a member or member organization
for clearing in the Firm range at The Options
Clearing Corporation. See Options 7, Section 1(c).
7 The term ‘‘Broker-Dealer’’ applies to any
transaction which is not subject to any of the other
transaction fees applicable within a particular
category. See Options 7, Section 1(c).
8 The term ‘‘Customer’’ applies to any transaction
that is identified by a member or member
organization for clearing in the Customer range at
The Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) which
is not for the account of a broker or dealer or for
the account of a ‘‘Professional’’ (as that term is
defined in Options 1, Section 1(b)(45)). See Options
7, Section 1(c).
9 The term ‘‘Professional’’ applies to transactions
for the accounts of Professionals, as defined in
Options 1, Section 1(b)(45) means any person or
entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities,
and (ii) places more than 390 orders in listed
options per day on average during a calendar month
for its own beneficial account(s). See Options 7,
Section 1(c).
10 Electronic QCC Orders are described in
Options 3, Section 12.
11 Floor QCC Orders are described in Options 8,
Section 30(e).
12 Volume resulting from all executed electronic
QCC Orders and Floor QCC Orders, including
Customer-to-Customer, Customer-to-Professional,
and Professional-to-Professional transactions and
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2022 / Notices
Tier
Tier
Tier
Tier
Tier
Tier
Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
........................................
0 to 99,999 contracts in a month ..................................................................................................
100,000 to 299,999 contracts in a month .....................................................................................
300,000 to 499,999 contracts in a month .....................................................................................
500,000 to 699,999 contracts in a month .....................................................................................
700,000 to 999,999 contracts in a month .....................................................................................
Over 1,000,000 contracts in a month ...........................................................................................
JSPEARS on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,13 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
of the Act,14 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Commission and the courts have
repeatedly expressed their preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, while
adopting a series of steps to improve the
current market model, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues and, also, recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 15
Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities
and Exchange Commission 16
(‘‘NetCoalition’’) the D.C. Circuit upheld
the Commission’s use of a market-based
approach in evaluating the fairness of
market data fees against a challenge
claiming that Congress mandated a costbased approach.17 As the court
emphasized, the Commission ‘‘intended
in Regulation NMS that ‘market forces,
rather than regulatory requirements’
play a role in determining the market
data . . . to be made available to
investors and at what cost.’’ 18
Further, ‘‘[n]o one disputes that
competition for order flow is ‘fierce.’
. . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n the U.S.
national market system, buyers and
sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . . ’’ 19 Although the court
and the SEC were discussing the cash
equities markets, the Exchange believes
that these views apply with equal force
to the options markets.
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to remove the limit on the
amount of QCC Rebate that will be paid
in a given month because it would allow
members and member organizations to
be paid QCC Rebates, for all qualifying
executed QCC Orders, without
limitation. Further, removing the limit
on the amount of QCC Rebate that
would be paid in a given month will
permit Phlx to compete more effectively
with other options exchange for QCC
Orders by incentivizing market
participants to transact a greater amount
of QCC Orders on Phlx in order to
receive a QCC Rebate.
The Exchange believes that it is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to remove the limit on
the amount of QCC Rebate that will be
paid in a given month because all
qualifying market participants are
excluding dividend, merger, short stock interest or
reversal or conversion strategy executions, is
aggregated in determining the applicable volume
tier.
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
15 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’).
16 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir.
2010).
17 See NetCoalition, at 534–535.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Aug 16, 2022
Rebate per
contract
Threshold
The Exchange does not pay a QCC
Rebate where the transaction is either:
(i) Customer-to-Customer; (ii) Customerto-Professional; (iii) Professional-toProfessional; or (iv) a dividend, merger,
short stock interest or reversal or
conversion strategy execution (as
defined in Options 7, Section 4). The
Exchange will continue to pay rebates
on QCC Orders as described above.
Today, the maximum QCC Rebate to
be paid in a given month may not
exceed $750,000. The Exchange
proposes to remove the limit on the
amount of QCC Rebate that will be paid
in a given month. With this proposal,
members and member organizations
will be paid QCC Rebates for all
qualifying executed QCC Orders
without limitation.
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50653
$0.00
0.05
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.11
eligible to transact QCC Orders, either
electronically or on the Trading Floor,
and would, therefore, be eligible to
receive QCC Rebates for all qualifying
executed QCC Orders, without
limitation.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
Inter-Market Competition
The proposal does not impose an
undue burden on inter-market
competition. The Exchange believes its
proposal remains competitive with
other options markets and will offer
market participants with another choice
of where to transact options. The
Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges. Because competitors are free
to modify their own fees in response,
and because market participants may
readily adjust their order routing
practices, the Exchange believes that the
degree to which fee changes in this
market may impose any burden on
competition is extremely limited.
Intra-Market Competition
The proposed amendments do not
impose an undue burden on intramarket competition. The Exchange
believes that removing the limit on the
amount of QCC Rebate that will be paid
in a given month does not impose an
undue burden on competition because
all qualifying market participants are
eligible to transact QCC Orders, either
18 Id.
at 537.
at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR
74770, 74782–83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–
NYSEArca–2006–21)).
19 Id.
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
50654
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2022 / Notices
electronically or on the Trading Floor,
and would, therefore, be eligible to
receive QCC Rebates for all qualifying
executed QCC Orders, without
limitation.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.20
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
JSPEARS on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2022–33 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2022–33. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2022–33 and should
be submitted on or before September 7,
2022.
Pacific Life Fund Advisors LLC
(‘‘PLFA’’ or the ‘‘Adviser’’).
The application was filed
on June 27, 2022.
FILING DATES:
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
An order granting the requested relief
will be issued unless the Commission
orders a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing on any application by
emailing the SEC’s Secretary at
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving
the relevant applicant with a copy of the
request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant applicant below,
or personally or by mail, if a physical
address is listed for the relevant
applicant below.
Hearing requests should be received
by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on
September 7, 2022, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on
applicants, in the form of an affidavit or,
for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the Act,
hearing requests should state the nature
of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing
upon the desirability of a hearing on the
matter, the reason for the request, and
the issues contested. Persons who wish
to be notified of a hearing may request
notification by emailing the
Commission’s Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–17669 Filed 8–16–22; 8:45 am]
ADDRESSES:
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
The Commission:
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicants:
Audrey L. Cheng, Esq., Audrey.Cheng@
PacificLife.com and Anthony Zacharski,
Esq., Anthony.Zacharski@Dechert.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[Investment Company Act Release No.
34671; 812–15360]
Pacific Funds Series Trust, et al.
Terri Jordan, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–
6825 (Division of Investment
Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).
For
Applicants’ representations, legal
analysis, and condition, please refer to
Applicants’ application, dated June 27,
2022, which may be obtained via the
Commission’s website by searching for
the file number at the top of this
document, or for an Applicant using the
Company name search field, on the
SEC’s EDGAR system. The SEC’s
EDGAR system may be searched at, at
https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/
legacy/companysearch.html. You may
also call the SEC’s Public Reference
Room at (202) 551–8090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
August 11, 2022.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice of an application under
Section 6(c) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’) for an exemption
from Section 15(c) of the Act.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: The requested
exemption would permit a Trust’s board
of trustees (the ‘‘Board’’) to approve new
sub-advisory agreements and material
amendments to existing sub-advisory
agreements without complying with the
in-person meeting requirement of
Section 15(c) of the Act.
APPLICANT: Pacific Funds Series Trust
and Pacific Select Fund (each a ‘‘Trust’’
and collectively the ‘‘Trusts’’), and
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–17658 Filed 8–16–22; 8:45 am]
20 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Aug 16, 2022
21 17
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50652-50654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-17669]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-95479; File No. SR-Phlx-2022-33]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 7,
Section 4
August 11, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 1, 2022, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 4, ``Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes options
overlying equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed)
(Excludes SPY and broad-based index options symbols listed within
Options 7, Section 5.A).''
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Phlx proposes to amend its Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section
4, ``Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes options overlying equities,
ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed) (Excludes SPY and
broad-based index options symbols listed within Options 7, Section
5.A).'' Specifically, Phlx proposes to remove the maximum Qualified
Contingent Cross (``QCC'') rebate that will be paid by the Exchange in
a given month. The Exchange believes that removing this rebate will
permit Phlx to compete more effectively with other options exchange for
QCC Orders by incentivizing market participants to transact a greater
amount of QCC Orders on Phlx in order to receive a QCC Rebate.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Phlx will monitor the impact of this proposal on QCC Order
volumes, and may in the future impose a maximum on the amount of QCC
Rebate it would pay to members and member organizations that execute
qualifying QCC Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, the Exchange assesses a $.20 per contract QCC Transaction
Fee for a Lead Market Maker,\4\ Market Maker,\5\ Firm \6\ and Broker-
Dealer.\7\ Customers \8\ and Professionals \9\ are not assessed a QCC
Transaction Fee. QCC Transaction Fees apply to electronic QCC Orders
\10\ and Floor QCC Orders.\11\ Rebates are paid on all qualifying
executed electronic QCC Orders and Floor QCC Orders based on the
following six tier rebate schedule:\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The term ``Lead Market Maker'' applies to transactions for
the account of a Lead Market Maker (as defined in Options 2, Section
12(a)). A Lead Market Maker is an Exchange member who is registered
as an options Lead Market Maker pursuant to Options 2, Section
12(a). An options Lead Market Maker includes a Remote Lead Market
Maker which is defined as an options Lead Market Maker in one or
more classes that does not have a physical presence on an Exchange
floor and is approved by the Exchange pursuant to Options 2, Section
11. See Options 7, Section 1(c). The term ``Floor Lead Market
Maker'' is a member who is registered as an options Lead Market
Maker pursuant to Options 2, Section 12(a) and has a physical
presence on the Exchange's trading floor. See Options 8, Section
2(a)(3).
\5\ The term ``Market Maker'' is defined in Options 1, Section
1(b)(28) as a member of the Exchange who is registered as an options
Market Maker pursuant to Options 2, Section 12(a). A Market Maker
includes SQTs and RSQTs as well as Floor Market Makers. See Options
7, Section 1(c). The term ``Floor Market Maker'' is a Market Maker
who is neither an SQT or an RSQT. A Floor Market Maker may provide a
quote in open outcry. See Options 8, Section 2(a)(4).
\6\ The term ``Firm'' applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member organization for clearing in the
Firm range at The Options Clearing Corporation. See Options 7,
Section 1(c).
\7\ The term ``Broker-Dealer'' applies to any transaction which
is not subject to any of the other transaction fees applicable
within a particular category. See Options 7, Section 1(c).
\8\ The term ``Customer'' applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member organization for clearing in the
Customer range at The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') which
is not for the account of a broker or dealer or for the account of a
``Professional'' (as that term is defined in Options 1, Section
1(b)(45)). See Options 7, Section 1(c).
\9\ The term ``Professional'' applies to transactions for the
accounts of Professionals, as defined in Options 1, Section 1(b)(45)
means any person or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in
securities, and (ii) places more than 390 orders in listed options
per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s). See Options 7, Section 1(c).
\10\ Electronic QCC Orders are described in Options 3, Section
12.
\11\ Floor QCC Orders are described in Options 8, Section 30(e).
\12\ Volume resulting from all executed electronic QCC Orders
and Floor QCC Orders, including Customer-to-Customer, Customer-to-
Professional, and Professional-to-Professional transactions and
excluding dividend, merger, short stock interest or reversal or
conversion strategy executions, is aggregated in determining the
applicable volume tier.
[[Page 50653]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rebate per
Tier Threshold contract
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1............................ 0 to 99,999 $0.00
contracts in a
month.
Tier 2............................ 100,000 to 299,999 0.05
contracts in a
month.
Tier 3............................ 300,000 to 499,999 0.07
contracts in a
month.
Tier 4............................ 500,000 to 699,999 0.08
contracts in a
month.
Tier 5............................ 700,000 to 999,999 0.09
contracts in a
month.
Tier 6............................ Over 1,000,000 0.11
contracts in a
month.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not pay a QCC Rebate where the transaction is
either: (i) Customer-to-Customer; (ii) Customer-to-Professional; (iii)
Professional-to-Professional; or (iv) a dividend, merger, short stock
interest or reversal or conversion strategy execution (as defined in
Options 7, Section 4). The Exchange will continue to pay rebates on QCC
Orders as described above.
Today, the maximum QCC Rebate to be paid in a given month may not
exceed $750,000. The Exchange proposes to remove the limit on the
amount of QCC Rebate that will be paid in a given month. With this
proposal, members and member organizations will be paid QCC Rebates for
all qualifying executed QCC Orders without limitation.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\13\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005),
70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission
\16\ (``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of
a market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees
against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based
approach.\17\ As the court emphasized, the Commission ``intended in
Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory
requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be
made available to investors and at what cost.'' \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
\17\ See NetCoalition, at 534-535.
\18\ Id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . . '' \19\ Although the court and
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to remove the limit on
the amount of QCC Rebate that will be paid in a given month because it
would allow members and member organizations to be paid QCC Rebates,
for all qualifying executed QCC Orders, without limitation. Further,
removing the limit on the amount of QCC Rebate that would be paid in a
given month will permit Phlx to compete more effectively with other
options exchange for QCC Orders by incentivizing market participants to
transact a greater amount of QCC Orders on Phlx in order to receive a
QCC Rebate.
The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to remove the limit on the amount of QCC Rebate that
will be paid in a given month because all qualifying market
participants are eligible to transact QCC Orders, either electronically
or on the Trading Floor, and would, therefore, be eligible to receive
QCC Rebates for all qualifying executed QCC Orders, without limitation.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Inter-Market Competition
The proposal does not impose an undue burden on inter-market
competition. The Exchange believes its proposal remains competitive
with other options markets and will offer market participants with
another choice of where to transact options. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
Intra-Market Competition
The proposed amendments do not impose an undue burden on intra-
market competition. The Exchange believes that removing the limit on
the amount of QCC Rebate that will be paid in a given month does not
impose an undue burden on competition because all qualifying market
participants are eligible to transact QCC Orders, either
[[Page 50654]]
electronically or on the Trading Floor, and would, therefore, be
eligible to receive QCC Rebates for all qualifying executed QCC Orders,
without limitation.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2022-33 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2022-33. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2022-33 and should be submitted on
or before September 7, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-17669 Filed 8-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P