Certain Video Processing Devices and Products Containing the Same; Institution of Investigation, 48198-48199 [2022-16957]

Download as PDF 48198 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Notices 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on corrosionresistant steel products from China, India, Italy, and South Korea and the antidumping duty orders on corrosionresistant steel products from China, India, Italy, South Korea, and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on June 1, 2021 (86 FR 29283) and determined on September 7, 2021 that it would conduct full reviews (86 FR 69069, December 6, 2021). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on December 13, 2021 (86 FR 70859). The Commission conducted its hearing on May 19, 2022. All persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on August 3, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5337 (August 2022), entitled Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from China, India, Italy, South Korea, and Taiwan: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–534–537 and 731–TA–1274–1278 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: August 3, 2022. Katherine Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–16971 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–1323] khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Certain Video Processing Devices and Products Containing the Same; Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 1, 2022, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:34 Aug 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 VideoLabs, Inc. of Palo Alto, California. A supplement to the complaint was filed on July 21, 2022. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain video processing devices and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,769,238 (‘‘the ’238 Patent’’), U.S. Patent No. 8,139,878 (‘‘the ’878 Patent’’), U.S. Patent No. 8,208,542 (‘‘the ’542 Patent’’), and U.S. Patent No. 7,372,452 (‘‘the ’452 Patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists, or is in the process of being established, as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2021). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on August 2, 2022, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claim 1 of the ’238 patent; claims 1–4 of the ’878 patent; claims 1 and 2 of the ’542 patent; and claims 1–6 and 12–18 of the ’452 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists or in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘servers, desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, smartphones, and displays’’; (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: VideoLabs, Inc., 2303 Saint Francis Drive, Palo Alto, California 94303 (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Acer Inc. 8F, 88, Sec. 1, Xintai 5th Road, Xizhi, New Taipei City 221, F5 10516815, Taiwan Acer America Corporation, 1730 N. 1st Street, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95112 ASUSTeK Computer Inc., No. 15, LiTe Road, Beitou District, Taipai 112, F5, Taiwan ASUS Computer International, 48720 Kato Road, Fremont, CA 94538 Lenovo Group Limited, Lincoln House, 23rd Fl., Taikoo Place, 979 King’s Road, Quarry Bay, K3 0852, Hong Kong S.A.R. of China Lenovo (United States) Inc., 8001 Development Drive, Morrisville, NC 27560 Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., No. 69, Lide Street, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800, Chicago, IL 60654 MSI Computer Corp., 901 Canada Court, City of Industry, CA 91748 (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM 08AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / Notices accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 3, 2022. Katherine Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–16957 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act and The Federal Debt Collection and Procedures Act On July 28, 2022, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Thunder Diesel & Performance Co., et al., Civil Action No. 3:22–cv– 03042. The United States filed this lawsuit under the Clean Air Act. The United States’ complaint names Thunder Diesel & Performance Co., Red Deer Exhaust, Inc. (d/b/a Flo∼Pro), and Schumacher Estates LTD as defendants. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties for violations of the regulations that govern the manufacture and sale of aftermarket automobile parts that bypass or defeat emission controls on diesel trucks, which were manufactured and sold by Flo∼Pro to VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:34 Aug 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 retailers and sold by Thunder Diesel in Mountain Home, Arkansas to consumers. The complaint also seeks recovery of fraudulent financial transfers made by Thunder Diesel to Schumacher Estates LTD. The consent decree requires the defendants to perform injunctive relief and pay a $1.6 million civil penalty. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States v. Thunder Diesel & Performance Co., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–12234. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments: Send them to: By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@ usdoj.gov. Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. By mail ......... During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https:// www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ— ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $13.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Patricia McKenna, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 2022–16880 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION [NARA–22–0016; NARA–2022–060] Records Schedules; Availability and Request for Comments National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed records schedules; request for comments. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48199 The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) publishes notice of certain Federal agency requests for records disposition authority (records schedules). We publish notice in the Federal Register and on regulations.gov for records schedules in which agencies propose to dispose of records they no longer need to conduct agency business. We invite public comments on such records schedules. DATES: We must receive responses on the schedules listed in this notice by September 20, 2022. ADDRESSES: To view a records schedule in this notice, or submit a comment on one, use the following address: https:// www.regulations.gov/docket/NARA-220016/document. This is a direct link to the schedules posted in the docket for this notice on regulations.gov. You may submit comments by the following method: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. On the website, enter either of the numbers cited at the top of this notice into the search field. This will bring you to the docket for this notice, in which we have posted the records schedules open for comment. Each schedule has a ‘comment’ button so you can comment on that specific schedule. For more information on regulations.gov and on submitting comments, see their FAQs at https://www.regulations.gov/faq. If you are unable to comment via regulations.gov, you may email us at request.schedule@nara.gov for instructions on submitting your comment. You must cite the control number of the schedule you wish to comment on. You can find the control number for each schedule in parentheses at the end of each schedule’s entry in the list at the end of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Germino, Regulatory and External Policy Program Manager, by email at regulation_comments@nara.gov or by phone at 301–837–3758. For information about records schedules, contact Records Management Operations by email at request.schedule@nara.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Public Comment Procedures We are publishing notice of records schedules in which agencies propose to dispose of records they no longer need to conduct agency business. We invite public comments on these records schedules, as required by 44 U.S.C. 3303a(a), and list the schedules at the end of this notice by agency and E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM 08AUN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 151 (Monday, August 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48198-48199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-1323]


Certain Video Processing Devices and Products Containing the 
Same; Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on July 1, 2022, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of VideoLabs, Inc. of 
Palo Alto, California. A supplement to the complaint was filed on July 
21, 2022. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 
337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain video processing devices and products containing the same by 
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,769,238 
(``the '238 Patent''), U.S. Patent No. 8,139,878 (``the '878 Patent''), 
U.S. Patent No. 8,208,542 (``the '542 Patent''), and U.S. Patent No. 
7,372,452 (``the '452 Patent''). The complaint further alleges that an 
industry in the United States exists, or is in the process of being 
established, as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The 
complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation 
and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease 
and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-2560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of 
this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2021).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on August 2, 2022, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain products 
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claim 1 of the '238 patent; claims 1-4 of the '878 patent; claims 1 and 
2 of the '542 patent; and claims 1-6 and 12-18 of the '452 patent, and 
whether an industry in the United States exists or in the process of 
being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``servers, desktop 
computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, smartphones, and 
displays'';
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is:

    VideoLabs, Inc., 2303 Saint Francis Drive, Palo Alto, California 
94303

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

    Acer Inc. 8F, 88, Sec. 1, Xintai 5th Road, Xizhi, New Taipei City 
221, F5 10516815, Taiwan
    Acer America Corporation, 1730 N. 1st Street, Suite 400, San Jose, 
CA 95112
    ASUSTeK Computer Inc., No. 15, Li-Te Road, Beitou District, Taipai 
112, F5, Taiwan
    ASUS Computer International, 48720 Kato Road, Fremont, CA 94538
    Lenovo Group Limited, Lincoln House, 23rd Fl., Taikoo Place, 979 
King's Road, Quarry Bay, K3 0852, Hong Kong S.A.R. of China
    Lenovo (United States) Inc., 8001 Development Drive, Morrisville, 
NC 27560
    Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., No. 69, Lide Street, Zhonghe 
District, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan
    Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800, 
Chicago, IL 60654
    MSI Computer Corp., 901 Canada Court, City of Industry, CA 91748

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in

[[Page 48199]]

accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 
210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses 
will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days 
after the date of service by the complainant of the complaint and the 
notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to 
the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted 
unless good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 3, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-16957 Filed 8-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.