Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 47968-47970 [2022-16827]

Download as PDF 47968 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.17 Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this notice.18 Requests should contain the party’s name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing at a time and location to be determined.19 Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their case briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: July 29, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Preliminary Determination of No Temporary Rule. 19 CFR 351.310(c). 19 See 19 CFR 351.310. 18 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 International Trade Administration 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an administrative review of the Order, covering eight companies.2 On June 27, 2022, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce extended the due date for the preliminary results to July 29, 2022.3 For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4 [A–533–824] Scope of the Order Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2021 The merchandise subject to the Order is PET film. The PET film subject to the Order is currently classifiable under subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS number is provided for convenience and for customs purposes, the written product description, remains dispositive. For a full description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5 [FR Doc. 2022–16821 Filed 8–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from India. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. This review covers two producers and exporters of PET film from India, Jindal Poly Films (Jindal) and SRF Limited (SRF). We preliminarily determine that neither company made sales of subject merchandise below normal value (NV) during the POR. We are also rescinding the review with respect to six companies because all requests for review for these companies have been withdrawn. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable August 5, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith and Jacob Saude, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255 and (202) 482–0981, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background Appendix 17 See Shipments V. Rate for Respondent Not Selected for Individual Examination VI. Discussion of the Methodology VII. Currency Conversion VIII. Recommendation On July 1, 2002, Commerce published the antidumping duty order on PET film from India.1 On September 7, 2021, based on timely requests for a review, in accordance with 19 CFR 1 See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 44175 (July 1, 2002) (Order). PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Partial Rescission of Administrative Review Commerce initiated a review of eight companies in this proceeding. We are rescinding this administrative review with respect to six of these companies: (1) Ester Industries Ltd.; (2) Garware Polyester Ltd.; (3) MTZ Polyesters Ltd.; (4) Polyplex Corporation; (5) Uflex Ltd.; and (6) Vacmet India, pursuant to 19 CFR351.213(d)(1), because all review requests for these companies were timely withdrawn.6 Accordingly, the companies that remain subject to the instant review are Jindal and SRF.7 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 50034 (September 7, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet, and strip from India: Second Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (2020– 2021),’’ dated June 27, 2022. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India; 2020–2021’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 5 Id. 6 Id. at ‘‘Partial Rescission of Administrative Review.’’ 7 In the Initiation Notice, we initiated a review with respect to SRF Ltd., which is also known as SRF Limited of India and SRF Limited. See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 2020 86 FR 41949 (August 4, 2021), at footnote 7, unchanged in Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 2020 87 FR 5461 (February 1, 2022). E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act. Export price has been calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV has been calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an Appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https:// access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Company Not Selected for Individual Review The Act and Commerce’s regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.’’ However, where the dumping margins for individually examined respondents are all zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that Commerce may use ‘‘any reasonable method to establish the estimated all-others rate for exporters and producers not individually investigated, including averaging the estimated weighted average dumping margins determined for the exporters and producers individually investigated.’’ VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 In this review, we have preliminarily calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for SRF, the sole mandatory respondent, that is zero. Accordingly, Commerce preliminarily has assigned to Jindal, the company not individually examined, a margin of 0.00 percent. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of this review, Commerce preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins for the period July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021: Exporter/producer Jindal Poly Films Ltd .................. SRF Limited 8 .............................. Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 0.00 0.00 Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to disclose its calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results to interested parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than seven days after the date for filing case briefs.9 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.10 Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.11 Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS and must be served on interested parties.12 Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.13 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An 8 As noted above, SRF Limited is also known as SRF Limited of India and SRF Ltd. 9 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule). 10 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 11 Id. 12 See 19 CFR 351.303. 13 See Temporary Rule. PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 47969 electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a SRF’s weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for its importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of such sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either the SRF’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an importerspecific rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by SRF for which SRF did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such unreviewed entries pursuant to the reseller policy, i.e., the assessment rate for such entries will be equal to the all-others rate established at the less-than-fair value investigation (i.e., 5.71 percent ad valorem),14 if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. 14 See Order, 67 at 44176 (showing the dumping margin computed for ‘‘all others’’ as 24.14 percent); and Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 34899, 34901 (Final Determination) (showing an adjustment of 18.43 percent for export subsidies found in the companion CVD investigation). The cash deposit rate for all other exporters is the net of these figures (i.e., 5.71 percent). E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 47970 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices For Jindal, which was not selected for individual examination, we intend to assign an assessment rate based on the methodology described in the ‘‘Rates for Non-Examined Companies’’ section. For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).15 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of PET film from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for the companies under review will be the rate established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently-completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair value investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters is 5.71 percent.16 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. 15 The companies for which this review is rescinded are: (1) Ester Industries Ltd.; (2) Garware Polyester Ltd.; (3) MTZ Polyesters Ltd.; (4) Polyplex Corporation; Uflex Ltd.; and (6) Vacmet India. 16 See Order, 67 FR at 44176; and Final Determination, 67 FR at 34901. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Dated: July 29, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review IV. Company Not Selected for Individual Examination V. Scope of the Order VI. Comparisons to Normal Value VII. Date of Sale VIII. Export Price IX. Normal Value X. Currency Conversion XI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–16827 Filed 8–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–985] Xanthan Gum From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020–2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that the exporters subject to this antidumping duty (AD) administrative review did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value, and that one company AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (Shanghai Smart Chemicals Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Smart)) had no shipments of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. In addition, we are rescinding this review with respect to CP Kelco (Shandong) Biological Company Limited (CP Kelco Shandong). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable August 5, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Anadio, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3166. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 1, 2021, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the AD order on xanthan gum from the People’s Republic of China (China).1 Commerce published the Initiation Notice of this administrative review on September 7, 2020.2 For details regarding the events that occurred subsequent to the initiation of the review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3 The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in the appendix to this notice. On March 3, 2022, Commerce extended the deadline for these preliminary results to July 29, 2022.4 1 See Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 43143 (July 19, 2013) (Order); and Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 86 FR 35065 (July 1, 2021). 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 50034 (September 7, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Eighth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of the 2020–2021 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 150 (Friday, August 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47968-47970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-824]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: 
Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2020-2021

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene 
terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from India. The period 
of review (POR) is July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. This review 
covers two producers and exporters of PET film from India, Jindal Poly 
Films (Jindal) and SRF Limited (SRF). We preliminarily determine that 
neither company made sales of subject merchandise below normal value 
(NV) during the POR. We are also rescinding the review with respect to 
six companies because all requests for review for these companies have 
been withdrawn. Interested parties are invited to comment on these 
preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable August 5, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith and Jacob Saude, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5255 
and (202) 482-0981, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 1, 2002, Commerce published the antidumping duty order on 
PET film from India.\1\ On September 7, 2021, based on timely requests 
for a review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce 
initiated an administrative review of the Order, covering eight 
companies.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 
44175 (July 1, 2002) (Order).
    \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 50034 (September 7, 2021) (Initiation 
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 27, 2022, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), 
Commerce extended the due date for the preliminary results to July 29, 
2022.\3\ For a complete description of the events that followed the 
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, 
sheet, and strip from India: Second Extension of Deadline for 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (2020-
2021),'' dated June 27, 2022.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
India; 2020-2021'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 
this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the Order is PET film. The PET film 
subject to the Order is currently classifiable under subheading 
3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS number is provided for convenience and for 
customs purposes, the written product description, remains dispositive. 
For a full description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

    Commerce initiated a review of eight companies in this proceeding. 
We are rescinding this administrative review with respect to six of 
these companies: (1) Ester Industries Ltd.; (2) Garware Polyester Ltd.; 
(3) MTZ Polyesters Ltd.; (4) Polyplex Corporation; (5) Uflex Ltd.; and 
(6) Vacmet India, pursuant to 19 CFR351.213(d)(1), because all review 
requests for these companies were timely withdrawn.\6\ Accordingly, the 
companies that remain subject to the instant review are Jindal and 
SRF.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id. at ``Partial Rescission of Administrative Review.''
    \7\ In the Initiation Notice, we initiated a review with respect 
to SRF Ltd., which is also known as SRF Limited of India and SRF 
Limited. See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 
and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2019-2020 86 FR 41949 (August 4, 2021), at footnote 7, unchanged in 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020 87 FR 
5461 (February 1, 2022).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 47969]]

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Act. Export price has been calculated in accordance with 
section 772 of the Act. NV has been calculated in accordance with 
section 773 of the Act.
    For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics 
included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an 
Appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the 
internet at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Company Not Selected for Individual Review

    The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment 
of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual 
examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative 
review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce 
looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for 
calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for 
guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not 
selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under 
section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an 
amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average 
dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually 
investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins 
determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .'' However, 
where the dumping margins for individually examined respondents are all 
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that Commerce may use ``any reasonable 
method to establish the estimated all-others rate for exporters and 
producers not individually investigated, including averaging the 
estimated weighted average dumping margins determined for the exporters 
and producers individually investigated.''
    In this review, we have preliminarily calculated a weighted-average 
dumping margin for SRF, the sole mandatory respondent, that is zero. 
Accordingly, Commerce preliminarily has assigned to Jindal, the company 
not individually examined, a margin of 0.00 percent.

Preliminary Results of Review

    As a result of this review, Commerce preliminarily determines that 
the following weighted-average dumping margins for the period July 1, 
2020, through June 30, 2021:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Exporter/producer                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jindal Poly Films Ltd.......................................        0.00
SRF Limited \8\.............................................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As noted above, SRF Limited is also known as SRF Limited of 
India and SRF Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to disclose its calculations performed in 
connection with these preliminary results to interested parties within 
five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties 
may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 
in the case briefs, may be filed not later than seven days after the 
date for filing case briefs.\9\ Parties who submit case briefs or 
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each 
argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\10\ Executive summaries 
should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.\11\ Case 
and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS and must be served on 
interested parties.\12\ Note that Commerce has temporarily modified 
certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business 
proprietary information, until further notice.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/
CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective 
Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule).
    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
    \11\ Id.
    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
    \13\ See Temporary Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Acting Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully 
in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of 
this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, 
and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of 
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to 
those raised in the respective case briefs.
    Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative 
review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in 
any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of 
publication of this notice, unless extended, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall 
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a SRF's weighted-
average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 
percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate 
importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates on the basis of the ratio 
of the total amount of dumping calculated for its importer's examined 
sales and the total entered value of such sales, in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either the SRF's weighted-average dumping 
margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), 
or an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct 
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping 
duties.
    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by SRF 
for which SRF did not know its merchandise was destined for the United 
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such unreviewed entries 
pursuant to the reseller policy, i.e., the assessment rate for such 
entries will be equal to the all-others rate established at the less-
than-fair value investigation (i.e., 5.71 percent ad valorem),\14\ if 
there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the 
transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Order, 67 at 44176 (showing the dumping margin computed 
for ``all others'' as 24.14 percent); and Notice of Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Polyethylene 
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 34899, 34901 
(Final Determination) (showing an adjustment of 18.43 percent for 
export subsidies found in the companion CVD investigation). The cash 
deposit rate for all other exporters is the net of these figures 
(i.e., 5.71 percent).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 47970]]

    For Jindal, which was not selected for individual examination, we 
intend to assign an assessment rate based on the methodology described 
in the ``Rates for Non-Examined Companies'' section. For the companies 
for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be 
assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping 
duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for 
consumption, during the period July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The companies for which this review is rescinded are: (1) 
Ester Industries Ltd.; (2) Garware Polyester Ltd.; (3) MTZ 
Polyesters Ltd.; (4) Polyplex Corporation; Uflex Ltd.; and (6) 
Vacmet India.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 35 days 
after the date of publication of the final results of this 
administrative review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is 
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment 
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until 
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has 
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of PET film from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for the companies 
under review will be the rate established in the final results of this 
review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will 
be required); (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not 
listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently-completed segment of this 
proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is 
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-
fair value investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate 
will be the rate established for the most recently-completed segment of 
this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other producers or exporters is 5.71 percent.\16\ 
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Order, 67 FR at 44176; and Final Determination, 67 FR 
at 34901.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).

    Dated: July 29, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
IV. Company Not Selected for Individual Examination
V. Scope of the Order
VI. Comparisons to Normal Value
VII. Date of Sale
VIII. Export Price
IX. Normal Value
X. Currency Conversion
XI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2022-16827 Filed 8-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.