Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2020, 47973-47975 [2022-16825]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, any suspended entries of subject merchandise that entered under that exporter’s CBP case number during the POR will be liquidated at the dumping margin assigned to the Chinawide entity. In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of ADs on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated ADs, where applicable. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of xanthan gum from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the notice of the final results of this administrative review in the Federal Register, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for companies granted a separate rate in the final results of this review, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review for the company (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed China and non-China exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all China exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-wide entity, which is 154.07 percent; and (4) for all non-China exporters of subject merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to China exporter(s) that supplied that non-China exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/ or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 47973 result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double ADs. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5973 or (202) 482–6261, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4). Background On July 21 and 29 and August 2, 2021, we received requests for multiple administrative reviews.1 On September 7, 2021, Commerce published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on CORE from Korea.2 On September 28, 2021, Commerce selected KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (KG Dongbu Steel)/Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. (collectively, KG Dongbu) and Hyundai Steel Company as mandatory respondents in this administrative review.3 On March 10, 2022, Commerce extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this review.4 For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5 A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included at the Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed Dated: July 29, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Sections in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Review IV. Scope of the Order V. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review VI. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments VII. Selection of Respondents VIII. Single Entity Treatment IX. Discussion of Methodology X. Currency Conversion XI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–16819 Filed 8–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–580–879] Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Additionally, Commerce is rescinding the review with respect to 31 companies. DATES: Applicable August 5, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis McClure or Zachariah Hall, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1 See Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Steel Dynamics Inc., Nucor Corporation, and United States Steel Corporation’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated August 2, 2021; see also KG Dongbu Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 29, 2021; Hyundai Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 20, 2021; SeAH Coated Metal’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated August 2, 2021; and POSCO’s and POSCO C&C’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 20, 2021. 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 50034 (September 7, 2021); see also Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy Republic of Korea and the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016) (Order). 3 On March 27, 2020, KG Dongbu Steel’s shareholders changed its name from Dongbu Steel to KG Dongbu Steel. See Dongbu’s Letter, ‘‘Affiliated Companies Response,’’ dated October 28, 2021. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for the Preliminary Results of the 2020 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated March 10, 2022. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 47974 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx/. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is certain corrosion-resistant steel products. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rescission of Administrative Review, In Part On February 11, 2022, Commerce notified interested parties that we intended to rescind this administrative review with respect to the 31 companies listed in Appendix III, because there are no reviewable suspended entries for these companies based on the POR entry data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).6 No parties commented on the notification of intent to rescind the review, in part. Therefore, we determine that there were no entries of subject merchandise, during the POR, by these companies based on the CBP data. As a result of our finding, we are rescinding this review, in part, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) with respect to the 31 companies listed in Appendix III to this notice. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution from an authority that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.7 For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review The statute and Commerce’s regulations do not directly address the CVD rates to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination where Commerce limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. However, Commerce normally determines the rates for non-selected companies in reviews in a manner that is consistent with section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In Part,’’ dated February 11, 2022. 7 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 investigation. Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act provides that ‘‘the individual countervailable subsidy rates determined under subparagraph (A) shall be used to determine the all-others rate under section 705(c)(5) {of the Act}.’’ Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that for companies not investigated, in general, we will determine an all-others rate by weightaveraging the countervailable subsidy rates established for each of the companies individually investigated, excluding zero and de minimis rates or any rates based solely on the facts available. We preliminarily determine that KG Dongbu is the only mandatory respondent that received countervailable subsidies that are above de minimis. Therefore, we preliminarily determine to apply the net subsidy rate calculated for KG Dongbu to the nonselected companies. For a list of the six companies for which a review was requested but are not being rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents or found to be cross-owned with a mandatory respondent, see Appendix II to this notice. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the net countervailable subsidy rates to be: Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Producer/exporter KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. and its Cross-Owned Affiliate, Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd 8 ................... Hyundai Steel Company, and its Cross-Owned Affiliate, Hyundai Green Power ................................... Non-Selected Companies Under Review 9 ................................................ 9.51 * 0.27 9.51 * (de minimis). Assessment Rate Verification As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to verify the information relied upon for its final results. Disclosure and Public Comment We intend to disclose to interested parties the calculations performed for these preliminary results within five 8 Note to importers: in the previous administrative review, Commerce found that KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. is the successor-in-interest to Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. See Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019, 87 FR 2759, 2760 (January 19, 2022). The name Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. should no longer be used on entry documentation. 9 See Appendix II. PO 00000 Frm 00018 days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). A timeline for the submission of case and rebuttal briefs and written comments will be provided to interested parties at a later date.10 Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.11 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this review are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain the party’s name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Unless the deadline is extended, we intend to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of the issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily assigned subsidy rates in the amounts shown above for the producer/exporters shown above. Upon completion of the administrative review, consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For the companies for which this review is rescinded, we will instruct CBP to assess CVDs on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit 10 See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d). Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 11 See E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2022 / Notices of estimated CVDs required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP for these companies no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. For the companies remaining in the review, we will instruct CBP to assess CVDs on all appropriate entries at the subsidy rates calculated in the final results of this review. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends, upon publication of the final results, to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown for each of the respective companies listed above on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits at the most recent company-specific or all others rate applicable to the company. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Interested Parties These preliminary results are issued and published pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: July 29, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Review IV. Scope of the Order V. Diversification of Korea’s Economy VI. Subsidies Valuation Information VII. Analysis of Programs VIII. Recommendation 17:20 Aug 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 List of Non-Selected Companies 1. POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd. 2. POSCO 3. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4. SeAH Coated Metal 5. SeAH Steel Corporation 6. SY Co., Ltd. Appendix III List of Rescinded Companies 1. Ajin H & S Co., Ltd. 2. AJU Steel Co. Ltd. 3. B&N International 4. CDS Global Logistics 5. Daewon SD Co., Ltd. 6. Dong A Hwa Sung Co., Ltd. 7. Dongkuk International, Inc. 8. Jawon Korea Co., Ltd. 9. Kima Steel Corporation 10. Korea Clad Tech. Co., Ltd. 11. Pantos Logistics Co., Ltd. 12. PL Special Steel Co., Ltd. 13. POSCO Daewoo Corp. 14. Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. 15. Samsung C&T Corporation 16. Sanglim Steel Co., Ltd. 17. Seajin St. Industry, Ltd. 18. Segye Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. 19. Sejung Shipping Co., Ltd. 20. Seun Steel Co., Ltd. 21. Shengzhou Hanshine Import and Export Trade 22. Soon Hong Trading Co., Ltd. 23. SSangyong Manufacturing 24. Sung A Steel Co., Ltd. 25. SW Co., Ltd. 26. Syon 27. TCC Steel. Co., Ltd. 28. Young Steel Co. 29. Young Steel Korea Co., Ltd. 30. Young Sun Steel Co. 31. Yuchang Air Con Co., Ltd. [FR Doc. 2022–16825 Filed 8–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–489–829] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020– 2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that producers or exporters of steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey) subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. AGENCY: Appendix I VerDate Sep<11>2014 Appendix II PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 47975 Additionally, we preliminarily find that one company made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable August 5, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Copyak or Jose Rivera, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3642 or (202) 482–0842, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 14, 2017, Commerce published the antidumping duty order on rebar from Turkey.1 On August 31, 2021, based on timely requests for a review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an administrative review of the Order, covering six companies.2 On September 29, 2021, Commerce selected Colakoglu 3 and Kaptan 4 as the mandatory respondents for this review.5 On March 15, 2021, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination for the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 32532 (July 14, 2017), as amended by Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Amended Final Determination in the LessThan-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination, 87 FR 934 (January 22, 2022) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 50034 (August 31, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 3 Colakoglu is comprised of the collapsed entity Colakoglu Metalurji A.S. (Colakoglu Metal) and Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S. (COTAS). See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 86 FR 43181 (August 6, 2021) (Rebar from Turkey 2019– 2020 Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM), at 6–9, unchanged in Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 87 FR 7118 (February 8, 2022) (Rebar from Turkey 2019– 2020 Final Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM), at 5. 4 Kaptan is comprised of the collapsed entity Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi Ve Ticaret A.S. (Kaptan Demir) and Kaptan Metal Dis Ticaret Ve Nakliyat A.S. (Kaptan Metal). See Rebar from Turkey 2019–2020 Preliminary Results PDM at 6– 9, unchanged in Rebar from Turkey 2019–2020 Final Results IDM at 5. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection Memorandum for Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey; 2020– 2021,’’ dated September 29, 2021. E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 150 (Friday, August 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47973-47975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-580-879]


Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of 
Korea: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing 
Duty Administrative Review, 2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to 
producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products 
(CORE) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) 
is January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Additionally, Commerce 
is rescinding the review with respect to 31 companies.

DATES: Applicable August 5, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis McClure or Zachariah Hall, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5973 or (202) 
482-6261, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 21 and 29 and August 2, 2021, we received requests for 
multiple administrative reviews.\1\ On September 7, 2021, Commerce 
published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the 
countervailing duty (CVD) order on CORE from Korea.\2\ On September 28, 
2021, Commerce selected KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (KG Dongbu Steel)/
Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. (collectively, KG Dongbu) and Hyundai 
Steel Company as mandatory respondents in this administrative 
review.\3\ On March 10, 2022, Commerce extended the deadline for the 
preliminary results of this review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Steel Dynamics Inc., Nucor 
Corporation, and United States Steel Corporation's Letter, ``Request 
for Administrative Review,'' dated August 2, 2021; see also KG 
Dongbu Steel's Letter, ``Request for Administrative Review,'' dated 
July 29, 2021; Hyundai Steel's Letter, ``Request for Administrative 
Review,'' dated July 20, 2021; SeAH Coated Metal's Letter, ``Request 
for Administrative Review,'' dated August 2, 2021; and POSCO's and 
POSCO C&C's Letter, ``Request for Administrative Review,'' dated 
July 20, 2021.
    \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 50034 (September 7, 2021); see also 
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy 
Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China: Countervailing 
Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016) (Order).
    \3\ On March 27, 2020, KG Dongbu Steel's shareholders changed 
its name from Dongbu Steel to KG Dongbu Steel. See Dongbu's Letter, 
``Affiliated Companies Response,'' dated October 28, 2021.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for the Preliminary 
Results of the 2020 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' 
dated March 10, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that followed the 
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\5\ 
A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 
included at the Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed

[[Page 47974]]

directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2020: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 
Products from the Republic of Korea,'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the Order is certain corrosion-resistant 
steel products. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, 
see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Rescission of Administrative Review, In Part

    On February 11, 2022, Commerce notified interested parties that we 
intended to rescind this administrative review with respect to the 31 
companies listed in Appendix III, because there are no reviewable 
suspended entries for these companies based on the POR entry data from 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).\6\ No parties commented on 
the notification of intent to rescind the review, in part. Therefore, 
we determine that there were no entries of subject merchandise, during 
the POR, by these companies based on the CBP data. As a result of our 
finding, we are rescinding this review, in part, pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(3) with respect to the 31 companies listed in Appendix III 
to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In 
Part,'' dated February 11, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each 
of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily 
determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution from 
an authority that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that 
the subsidy is specific.\7\ For a full description of the methodology 
underlying our conclusions, see the accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not directly address the 
CVD rates to be applied to companies not selected for individual 
examination where Commerce limited its examination in an administrative 
review pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. However, Commerce 
normally determines the rates for non-selected companies in reviews in 
a manner that is consistent with section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which 
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an 
investigation. Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act provides that ``the 
individual countervailable subsidy rates determined under subparagraph 
(A) shall be used to determine the all-others rate under section 
705(c)(5) {of the Act{time} .'' Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act states 
that for companies not investigated, in general, we will determine an 
all-others rate by weight-averaging the countervailable subsidy rates 
established for each of the companies individually investigated, 
excluding zero and de minimis rates or any rates based solely on the 
facts available.
    We preliminarily determine that KG Dongbu is the only mandatory 
respondent that received countervailable subsidies that are above de 
minimis. Therefore, we preliminarily determine to apply the net subsidy 
rate calculated for KG Dongbu to the non-selected companies. For a list 
of the six companies for which a review was requested but are not being 
rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents or 
found to be cross-owned with a mandatory respondent, see Appendix II to 
this notice.

Preliminary Results of Review

    As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the net 
countervailable subsidy rates to be:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Subsidy
                                                                 rate
                     Producer/exporter                         (percent
                                                             ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. and its Cross-Owned Affiliate,            9.51
 Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd \8\.........................
Hyundai Steel Company, and its Cross-Owned Affiliate,             * 0.27
 Hyundai Green Power.......................................
Non-Selected Companies Under Review \9\....................         9.51
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* (de minimis).

Verification
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Note to importers: in the previous administrative review, 
Commerce found that KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. is the successor-in-
interest to Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant 
Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results and Partial 
Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019, 87 FR 
2759, 2760 (January 19, 2022). The name Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. 
should no longer be used on entry documentation.
    \9\ See Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to 
verify the information relied upon for its final results.

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose to interested parties the calculations 
performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). A 
timeline for the submission of case and rebuttal briefs and written 
comments will be provided to interested parties at a later date.\10\ 
Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements 
for serving documents containing business proprietary information, 
until further notice.\11\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), 
parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this review are 
encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; 
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d).
    \11\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements 
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 
10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal 
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain 
the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of 
participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list 
of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, 
Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time and date to be 
determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and 
location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
    Unless the deadline is extended, we intend to issue the final 
results of this administrative review, which will include the results 
of our analysis of the issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 
days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal 
Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.213(h).

Assessment Rate

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily 
assigned subsidy rates in the amounts shown above for the producer/
exporters shown above. Upon completion of the administrative review, 
consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), 
Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, countervailing duties 
on all appropriate entries covered by this review.
    For the companies for which this review is rescinded, we will 
instruct CBP to assess CVDs on all appropriate entries at a rate equal 
to the cash deposit

[[Page 47975]]

of estimated CVDs required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 
warehouse, for consumption, during the period January 1, 2020, through 
December 31, 2020, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). We 
intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP for these companies no 
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of this notice in 
the Federal Register.
    For the companies remaining in the review, we will instruct CBP to 
assess CVDs on all appropriate entries at the subsidy rates calculated 
in the final results of this review. We intend to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of 
publication of the final results of this review in the Federal 
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to 
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request 
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends, 
upon publication of the final results, to instruct CBP to collect cash 
deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown for 
each of the respective companies listed above on shipments of subject 
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after the date of publication of the final results of this 
administrative review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP 
to continue to collect cash deposits at the most recent company-
specific or all others rate applicable to the company. These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.

Notification to Interested Parties

    These preliminary results are issued and published pursuant to 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: July 29, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Review
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Diversification of Korea's Economy
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Recommendation

Appendix II

List of Non-Selected Companies

1. POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd.
2. POSCO
3. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
4. SeAH Coated Metal
5. SeAH Steel Corporation
6. SY Co., Ltd.

Appendix III

List of Rescinded Companies

1. Ajin H & S Co., Ltd.
2. AJU Steel Co. Ltd.
3. B&N International
4. CDS Global Logistics
5. Daewon SD Co., Ltd.
6. Dong A Hwa Sung Co., Ltd.
7. Dongkuk International, Inc.
8. Jawon Korea Co., Ltd.
9. Kima Steel Corporation
10. Korea Clad Tech. Co., Ltd.
11. Pantos Logistics Co., Ltd.
12. PL Special Steel Co., Ltd.
13. POSCO Daewoo Corp.
14. Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd.
15. Samsung C&T Corporation
16. Sanglim Steel Co., Ltd.
17. Seajin St. Industry, Ltd.
18. Segye Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
19. Sejung Shipping Co., Ltd.
20. Seun Steel Co., Ltd.
21. Shengzhou Hanshine Import and Export Trade
22. Soon Hong Trading Co., Ltd.
23. SSangyong Manufacturing
24. Sung A Steel Co., Ltd.
25. SW Co., Ltd.
26. Syon
27. TCC Steel. Co., Ltd.
28. Young Steel Co.
29. Young Steel Korea Co., Ltd.
30. Young Sun Steel Co.
31. Yuchang Air Con Co., Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2022-16825 Filed 8-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.