Certain Digital Video-Capable Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation, 18039-18040 [2022-06528]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Notices
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of response.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Abstract: This authority and
responsibility are among those
delegated to BSEE. The regulations at 30
CFR 250, subpart F, Oil and Gas WellWorkover Operations are the subject of
this collection. This request also covers
any related Notices to Lessees and
Operators (NTLs) that BSEE issues to
clarify, supplement, or provide
additional guidance on some aspects of
our regulations. BSEE uses the
information collected (see A.12 for the
actual information collected by BSEE) to
analyze and evaluate planned wellworkover operations to ensure that these
operations result in personnel safety
and protection of the environment.
BSEE will use this evaluation in making
decisions to approve, disapprove, or to
require modification to the proposed
well-workover operations. Specifically,
BSEE uses the information collected to:
• Review log entries of crew meetings
to verify that safety procedures have
been properly reviewed.
• review well-workover procedures
relating to hydrogen sulfide (H2S) to
ensure the safety of the crew in the
event of encountering H2S.
• review well-workover diagrams and
procedures to ensure the safety of wellworkover operations.
• verify that the crown block safety
device is operating and can be expected
to function and avoid accidents.
• verify that the BOPE is in
compliance with the latest WCR and
API Standard 53.
• assure that the well-workover
operations are conducted on well casing
that is structurally competent.
Title of Collection: 30 CFR 250,
Subpart F, Oil and Gas Well-Workover
Operations.
OMB Control Number: 1014–0001.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Mar 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
Respondents/Affected Public:
Potential respondents include Federal
OCS oil, gas, and sulfur lessees and/or
operators and holders of pipeline rightsof-way.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: Currently there are
approximately 60 Oil and Gas Drilling
and Production Operators in the OCS.
Not all the potential respondents will
submit information in any given year,
and some may submit multiple times.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 1,933.
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: Varies from 1 hours to 6.5
hours, depending on activity.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 5,284.
Respondent’s Obligation: Responses
are mandatory or are to retain/maintain
benefits.
Frequency of Collection: Submissions
are generally on occasion.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: We have identified no
non-hour cost burdens associated with
this collection of information.
An agency may not conduct, or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Kirk Malstrom,
Chief, Regulations and Standards Branch.
[FR Doc. 2022–06539 Filed 3–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1224]
Certain Digital Video-Capable Devices
and Components Thereof; Notice of a
Commission Determination Finding No
Violation of Section 337; Termination
of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has
determined to affirm in part, on
modified grounds, reverse in part, and
take no position in part on a final initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
finding no violation of section 337. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda P. Fisherow, Esq., Office of the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18039
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2737. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted the present
investigation on October 22, 2020, based
on a complaint and supplement thereto
filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V. of
Eindhoven, Netherlands and Philips
North America LLC of Cambridge,
Massachusetts (collectively, ‘‘Philips’’).
85 FR 67373–74 (Oct. 22, 2020). The
complaint, as supplemented, alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, based upon the importation, sale
for importation, and sale in the United
States after importation of certain digital
video-capable devices and components
thereof by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
9,436,809 (‘‘the ’809 patent’’); 9,590,977
(‘‘the ’977 patent’’); 10,091,186 (‘‘the
’186 patent’’); and 10,298,564 (‘‘the ’564
patent’’). Id. at 67373. The complaint
further alleged that an industry in the
United States exists or is in the process
of being established, as required by
section 337. Id. The notice of
investigation named the following
respondents: Dell Technologies Inc. of
Round Rock, Texas and Dell Inc. of
Round Rock, Texas (together ‘‘Dell’’);
Hisense Co. Ltd. of Qingdao, China,
Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd. of
Qingdao, China, Hisense Electronics
Manufacturing Company of America
Corporation of Suwanee, Georgia,
Hisense USA Corporation of Suwanee,
Georgia, Hisense Import & Export Co.
Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense
International Co., Ltd. of Qingdao,
China, Hisense International (HK) Co.,
Ltd. of Sheung Wan, Hong Kong (SAR),
and Hisense International (Hong Kong)
America Investment Co., Ltd. of Sheung
Wan, Hong Kong (SAR) (together,
‘‘Hisense’’); HP, Inc. of Palo Alto,
California (‘‘HP’’); Lenovo Group Ltd. of
Quarry Bay, Hong Kong (SAR) and
Lenovo (United States), Inc. of
Morrisville, North Carolina (together,
‘‘Lenovo’’); LG Electronics, Inc. of
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
18040
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Notices
Seoul, Republic of Korea and LG
Electronics USA, Inc. of Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey (together ‘‘LG’’); TCL
Industries Holdings Co., Ltd., of
Guangdong, China, TCL Electronics
Holdings Ltd. of Hong Kong Science
Park, Hong Kong (SAR), TCL King
Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd.
of Huizhou, China, TTE Technology,
Inc. of Corona, California, TCL Moka
International Ltd. of Sha Tin, Hong
Kong, TCL Moka Manufacturing S.A. de
C.V. of Tijuana, Mexico, TCL Smart
Device (Vietnam) Company Ltd. of Binh
Duong, Vietnam (together ‘‘TCL’’);
MediaTek Inc. of Hsinchu, Taiwan and
MediaTek USA Inc. of San Jose,
California (together ‘‘MediaTek’’);
Realtek Semiconductor Corp. of
Hsinchu, Taiwan (‘‘Realtek’’); and Intel
Corporation of Santa Clara, California
(‘‘Intel’’). Id. at 67374. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is
participating in the investigation. Id.
During the course of the investigation,
Philips moved to terminate the
investigation as to various claims,
patents, and respondents, including LG
and MediaTek. See Order No. 19,
unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Apr. 15,
2021), Order No. 21, unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (May 12, 2021), Order
No. 26, unreviewed by Comm’n Notice
(Jun 21, 2021), Order 32, unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (July 26, 2021), Order
No. 40, unreviewed by Comm’n Notice
(Aug. 2, 2021), and Order No. 46,
unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Aug. 10,
2021). The Respondents remaining in
the investigation are Dell, Hisense, HP,
Lenovo, TCL, Realtek, and Intel
(together, ‘‘the Respondents’’). The
remaining asserted patent claims are:
claims 1, 9, 11, 12, and 14 of the ’186
patent; and claims 1, 18, 19, 21, and 25
of the ’564 patent.
On October 21, 2021, the ALJ issued
the subject ID. On November 2, 2021,
Philips and OUII each filed petitions for
review. Also, on November 2, 2021,
Respondents Intel, HP, Dell, and Lenovo
filed a contingent petition for review,
and Respondents HP, Realtek, Dell,
Lenovo, Hisense, and TCL filed a
separate contingent petition for review.
On November 10, 2021, Philips, OUII,
and the Respondents each filed replies.
On December 20, 2021, the
Commission determined to review the
ID in part. Specifically, the Commission
determined to review the ID’s findings
on claim construction, infringement,
validity, and domestic industry for both
of the ’186 and ’564 patents. Comm’n
Notice of Review (Dec. 20, 2021). The
Commission asked for briefing on
certain issues under review and on
remedy, bonding, and the public
interest. The parties filed their initial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Mar 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
responses on January 7, 2022 and their
replies on January 14, 2022.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the ID, the
petitions for review, responses, and
other submissions from the parties and
the public, the Commission has
determined that no violation of section
337 has occurred. Specifically, the
Commission finds that the asserted
claims of the ’186 and ’564 patents are
not infringed and the domestic industry
products do not practice the claims of
the ’186 and ’564 patents. The
Commission also takes no position on
various issues, as set forth in the
accompanying Opinion, including on
the economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement, anticipation,
obviousness, and whether the written
description requirement is met for the
claim terms ‘‘predetermined time’’ and
‘‘certificate.’’ The Commission’s
determinations are explained more fully
in the accompanying Opinion. All
findings in the ID under review that are
consistent with the Commission’s
determinations as set forth in the
accompanying Opinion are affirmed.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on March 23,
2022.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 23, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–06528 Filed 3–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140–0052]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection of
eComments Requested; ATF’s Office
of Strategic Management
Environmental Assessment Outreach
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
(ATF), Department of Justice (DOJ) will
submit the following information
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional 30
days until April 28, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and, if so, how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension, with change, of a currently
approved collection.
(2) The Title of the Form/Collection:
ATF’s Office of Strategic Management
Environmental Assessment Outreach.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Form number: None.
Component: Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S.
Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: Business or other for-profit.
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18039-18040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06528]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1224]
Certain Digital Video-Capable Devices and Components Thereof;
Notice of a Commission Determination Finding No Violation of Section
337; Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission (``Commission'') has determined to affirm in part, on
modified grounds, reverse in part, and take no position in part on a
final initial determination (``ID'') of the presiding administrative
law judge (``ALJ'') finding no violation of section 337. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda P. Fisherow, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the present
investigation on October 22, 2020, based on a complaint and supplement
thereto filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V. of Eindhoven, Netherlands and
Philips North America LLC of Cambridge, Massachusetts (collectively,
``Philips''). 85 FR 67373-74 (Oct. 22, 2020). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation, sale for
importation, and sale in the United States after importation of certain
digital video-capable devices and components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,436,809 (``the
'809 patent''); 9,590,977 (``the '977 patent''); 10,091,186 (``the '186
patent''); and 10,298,564 (``the '564 patent''). Id. at 67373. The
complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists
or is in the process of being established, as required by section 337.
Id. The notice of investigation named the following respondents: Dell
Technologies Inc. of Round Rock, Texas and Dell Inc. of Round Rock,
Texas (together ``Dell''); Hisense Co. Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense
Visual Technology Co., Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense Electronics
Manufacturing Company of America Corporation of Suwanee, Georgia,
Hisense USA Corporation of Suwanee, Georgia, Hisense Import & Export
Co. Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense International Co., Ltd. of Qingdao,
China, Hisense International (HK) Co., Ltd. of Sheung Wan, Hong Kong
(SAR), and Hisense International (Hong Kong) America Investment Co.,
Ltd. of Sheung Wan, Hong Kong (SAR) (together, ``Hisense''); HP, Inc.
of Palo Alto, California (``HP''); Lenovo Group Ltd. of Quarry Bay,
Hong Kong (SAR) and Lenovo (United States), Inc. of Morrisville, North
Carolina (together, ``Lenovo''); LG Electronics, Inc. of
[[Page 18040]]
Seoul, Republic of Korea and LG Electronics USA, Inc. of Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey (together ``LG''); TCL Industries Holdings Co.,
Ltd., of Guangdong, China, TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. of Hong Kong
Science Park, Hong Kong (SAR), TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou)
Co. Ltd. of Huizhou, China, TTE Technology, Inc. of Corona, California,
TCL Moka International Ltd. of Sha Tin, Hong Kong, TCL Moka
Manufacturing S.A. de C.V. of Tijuana, Mexico, TCL Smart Device
(Vietnam) Company Ltd. of Binh Duong, Vietnam (together ``TCL'');
MediaTek Inc. of Hsinchu, Taiwan and MediaTek USA Inc. of San Jose,
California (together ``MediaTek''); Realtek Semiconductor Corp. of
Hsinchu, Taiwan (``Realtek''); and Intel Corporation of Santa Clara,
California (``Intel''). Id. at 67374. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (``OUII'') is participating in the investigation. Id.
During the course of the investigation, Philips moved to terminate
the investigation as to various claims, patents, and respondents,
including LG and MediaTek. See Order No. 19, unreviewed by Comm'n
Notice (Apr. 15, 2021), Order No. 21, unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (May
12, 2021), Order No. 26, unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Jun 21, 2021),
Order 32, unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (July 26, 2021), Order No. 40,
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Aug. 2, 2021), and Order No. 46,
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Aug. 10, 2021). The Respondents remaining
in the investigation are Dell, Hisense, HP, Lenovo, TCL, Realtek, and
Intel (together, ``the Respondents''). The remaining asserted patent
claims are: claims 1, 9, 11, 12, and 14 of the '186 patent; and claims
1, 18, 19, 21, and 25 of the '564 patent.
On October 21, 2021, the ALJ issued the subject ID. On November 2,
2021, Philips and OUII each filed petitions for review. Also, on
November 2, 2021, Respondents Intel, HP, Dell, and Lenovo filed a
contingent petition for review, and Respondents HP, Realtek, Dell,
Lenovo, Hisense, and TCL filed a separate contingent petition for
review. On November 10, 2021, Philips, OUII, and the Respondents each
filed replies.
On December 20, 2021, the Commission determined to review the ID in
part. Specifically, the Commission determined to review the ID's
findings on claim construction, infringement, validity, and domestic
industry for both of the '186 and '564 patents. Comm'n Notice of Review
(Dec. 20, 2021). The Commission asked for briefing on certain issues
under review and on remedy, bonding, and the public interest. The
parties filed their initial responses on January 7, 2022 and their
replies on January 14, 2022.
Having examined the record of this investigation, including the ID,
the petitions for review, responses, and other submissions from the
parties and the public, the Commission has determined that no violation
of section 337 has occurred. Specifically, the Commission finds that
the asserted claims of the '186 and '564 patents are not infringed and
the domestic industry products do not practice the claims of the '186
and '564 patents. The Commission also takes no position on various
issues, as set forth in the accompanying Opinion, including on the
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement, anticipation,
obviousness, and whether the written description requirement is met for
the claim terms ``predetermined time'' and ``certificate.'' The
Commission's determinations are explained more fully in the
accompanying Opinion. All findings in the ID under review that are
consistent with the Commission's determinations as set forth in the
accompanying Opinion are affirmed.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on March 23,
2022.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 23, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-06528 Filed 3-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
