Certain Digital Video-Capable Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation, 18039-18040 [2022-06528]

Download as PDF lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Notices collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of response. Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Abstract: This authority and responsibility are among those delegated to BSEE. The regulations at 30 CFR 250, subpart F, Oil and Gas WellWorkover Operations are the subject of this collection. This request also covers any related Notices to Lessees and Operators (NTLs) that BSEE issues to clarify, supplement, or provide additional guidance on some aspects of our regulations. BSEE uses the information collected (see A.12 for the actual information collected by BSEE) to analyze and evaluate planned wellworkover operations to ensure that these operations result in personnel safety and protection of the environment. BSEE will use this evaluation in making decisions to approve, disapprove, or to require modification to the proposed well-workover operations. Specifically, BSEE uses the information collected to: • Review log entries of crew meetings to verify that safety procedures have been properly reviewed. • review well-workover procedures relating to hydrogen sulfide (H2S) to ensure the safety of the crew in the event of encountering H2S. • review well-workover diagrams and procedures to ensure the safety of wellworkover operations. • verify that the crown block safety device is operating and can be expected to function and avoid accidents. • verify that the BOPE is in compliance with the latest WCR and API Standard 53. • assure that the well-workover operations are conducted on well casing that is structurally competent. Title of Collection: 30 CFR 250, Subpart F, Oil and Gas Well-Workover Operations. OMB Control Number: 1014–0001. Form Number: None. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Mar 28, 2022 Jkt 256001 Respondents/Affected Public: Potential respondents include Federal OCS oil, gas, and sulfur lessees and/or operators and holders of pipeline rightsof-way. Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: Currently there are approximately 60 Oil and Gas Drilling and Production Operators in the OCS. Not all the potential respondents will submit information in any given year, and some may submit multiple times. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 1,933. Estimated Completion Time per Response: Varies from 1 hours to 6.5 hours, depending on activity. Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 5,284. Respondent’s Obligation: Responses are mandatory or are to retain/maintain benefits. Frequency of Collection: Submissions are generally on occasion. Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: We have identified no non-hour cost burdens associated with this collection of information. An agency may not conduct, or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Kirk Malstrom, Chief, Regulations and Standards Branch. [FR Doc. 2022–06539 Filed 3–28–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1224] Certain Digital Video-Capable Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has determined to affirm in part, on modified grounds, reverse in part, and take no position in part on a final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) finding no violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda P. Fisherow, Esq., Office of the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 18039 General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the present investigation on October 22, 2020, based on a complaint and supplement thereto filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V. of Eindhoven, Netherlands and Philips North America LLC of Cambridge, Massachusetts (collectively, ‘‘Philips’’). 85 FR 67373–74 (Oct. 22, 2020). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation, sale for importation, and sale in the United States after importation of certain digital video-capable devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,436,809 (‘‘the ’809 patent’’); 9,590,977 (‘‘the ’977 patent’’); 10,091,186 (‘‘the ’186 patent’’); and 10,298,564 (‘‘the ’564 patent’’). Id. at 67373. The complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established, as required by section 337. Id. The notice of investigation named the following respondents: Dell Technologies Inc. of Round Rock, Texas and Dell Inc. of Round Rock, Texas (together ‘‘Dell’’); Hisense Co. Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense Visual Technology Co., Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Corporation of Suwanee, Georgia, Hisense USA Corporation of Suwanee, Georgia, Hisense Import & Export Co. Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense International Co., Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense International (HK) Co., Ltd. of Sheung Wan, Hong Kong (SAR), and Hisense International (Hong Kong) America Investment Co., Ltd. of Sheung Wan, Hong Kong (SAR) (together, ‘‘Hisense’’); HP, Inc. of Palo Alto, California (‘‘HP’’); Lenovo Group Ltd. of Quarry Bay, Hong Kong (SAR) and Lenovo (United States), Inc. of Morrisville, North Carolina (together, ‘‘Lenovo’’); LG Electronics, Inc. of E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 18040 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Notices Seoul, Republic of Korea and LG Electronics USA, Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (together ‘‘LG’’); TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd., of Guangdong, China, TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. of Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong (SAR), TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd. of Huizhou, China, TTE Technology, Inc. of Corona, California, TCL Moka International Ltd. of Sha Tin, Hong Kong, TCL Moka Manufacturing S.A. de C.V. of Tijuana, Mexico, TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Company Ltd. of Binh Duong, Vietnam (together ‘‘TCL’’); MediaTek Inc. of Hsinchu, Taiwan and MediaTek USA Inc. of San Jose, California (together ‘‘MediaTek’’); Realtek Semiconductor Corp. of Hsinchu, Taiwan (‘‘Realtek’’); and Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, California (‘‘Intel’’). Id. at 67374. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is participating in the investigation. Id. During the course of the investigation, Philips moved to terminate the investigation as to various claims, patents, and respondents, including LG and MediaTek. See Order No. 19, unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Apr. 15, 2021), Order No. 21, unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 12, 2021), Order No. 26, unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Jun 21, 2021), Order 32, unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (July 26, 2021), Order No. 40, unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Aug. 2, 2021), and Order No. 46, unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Aug. 10, 2021). The Respondents remaining in the investigation are Dell, Hisense, HP, Lenovo, TCL, Realtek, and Intel (together, ‘‘the Respondents’’). The remaining asserted patent claims are: claims 1, 9, 11, 12, and 14 of the ’186 patent; and claims 1, 18, 19, 21, and 25 of the ’564 patent. On October 21, 2021, the ALJ issued the subject ID. On November 2, 2021, Philips and OUII each filed petitions for review. Also, on November 2, 2021, Respondents Intel, HP, Dell, and Lenovo filed a contingent petition for review, and Respondents HP, Realtek, Dell, Lenovo, Hisense, and TCL filed a separate contingent petition for review. On November 10, 2021, Philips, OUII, and the Respondents each filed replies. On December 20, 2021, the Commission determined to review the ID in part. Specifically, the Commission determined to review the ID’s findings on claim construction, infringement, validity, and domestic industry for both of the ’186 and ’564 patents. Comm’n Notice of Review (Dec. 20, 2021). The Commission asked for briefing on certain issues under review and on remedy, bonding, and the public interest. The parties filed their initial VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Mar 28, 2022 Jkt 256001 responses on January 7, 2022 and their replies on January 14, 2022. Having examined the record of this investigation, including the ID, the petitions for review, responses, and other submissions from the parties and the public, the Commission has determined that no violation of section 337 has occurred. Specifically, the Commission finds that the asserted claims of the ’186 and ’564 patents are not infringed and the domestic industry products do not practice the claims of the ’186 and ’564 patents. The Commission also takes no position on various issues, as set forth in the accompanying Opinion, including on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement, anticipation, obviousness, and whether the written description requirement is met for the claim terms ‘‘predetermined time’’ and ‘‘certificate.’’ The Commission’s determinations are explained more fully in the accompanying Opinion. All findings in the ID under review that are consistent with the Commission’s determinations as set forth in the accompanying Opinion are affirmed. The Commission vote for this determination took place on March 23, 2022. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 23, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–06528 Filed 3–28–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives [OMB Number 1140–0052] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection of eComments Requested; ATF’s Office of Strategic Management Environmental Assessment Outreach Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice. ACTION: 30-Day notice. AGENCY: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), Department of Justice (DOJ) will submit the following information SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for an additional 30 days until April 28, 2022. ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and, if so, how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Extension, with change, of a currently approved collection. (2) The Title of the Form/Collection: ATF’s Office of Strategic Management Environmental Assessment Outreach. (3) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: Form number: None. Component: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Business or other for-profit. E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18039-18040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06528]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1224]


Certain Digital Video-Capable Devices and Components Thereof; 
Notice of a Commission Determination Finding No Violation of Section 
337; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission (``Commission'') has determined to affirm in part, on 
modified grounds, reverse in part, and take no position in part on a 
final initial determination (``ID'') of the presiding administrative 
law judge (``ALJ'') finding no violation of section 337. The 
investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda P. Fisherow, Esq., Office of 
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the present 
investigation on October 22, 2020, based on a complaint and supplement 
thereto filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V. of Eindhoven, Netherlands and 
Philips North America LLC of Cambridge, Massachusetts (collectively, 
``Philips''). 85 FR 67373-74 (Oct. 22, 2020). The complaint, as 
supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation, sale for 
importation, and sale in the United States after importation of certain 
digital video-capable devices and components thereof by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,436,809 (``the 
'809 patent''); 9,590,977 (``the '977 patent''); 10,091,186 (``the '186 
patent''); and 10,298,564 (``the '564 patent''). Id. at 67373. The 
complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists 
or is in the process of being established, as required by section 337. 
Id. The notice of investigation named the following respondents: Dell 
Technologies Inc. of Round Rock, Texas and Dell Inc. of Round Rock, 
Texas (together ``Dell''); Hisense Co. Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense 
Visual Technology Co., Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense Electronics 
Manufacturing Company of America Corporation of Suwanee, Georgia, 
Hisense USA Corporation of Suwanee, Georgia, Hisense Import & Export 
Co. Ltd. of Qingdao, China, Hisense International Co., Ltd. of Qingdao, 
China, Hisense International (HK) Co., Ltd. of Sheung Wan, Hong Kong 
(SAR), and Hisense International (Hong Kong) America Investment Co., 
Ltd. of Sheung Wan, Hong Kong (SAR) (together, ``Hisense''); HP, Inc. 
of Palo Alto, California (``HP''); Lenovo Group Ltd. of Quarry Bay, 
Hong Kong (SAR) and Lenovo (United States), Inc. of Morrisville, North 
Carolina (together, ``Lenovo''); LG Electronics, Inc. of

[[Page 18040]]

Seoul, Republic of Korea and LG Electronics USA, Inc. of Englewood 
Cliffs, New Jersey (together ``LG''); TCL Industries Holdings Co., 
Ltd., of Guangdong, China, TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. of Hong Kong 
Science Park, Hong Kong (SAR), TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) 
Co. Ltd. of Huizhou, China, TTE Technology, Inc. of Corona, California, 
TCL Moka International Ltd. of Sha Tin, Hong Kong, TCL Moka 
Manufacturing S.A. de C.V. of Tijuana, Mexico, TCL Smart Device 
(Vietnam) Company Ltd. of Binh Duong, Vietnam (together ``TCL''); 
MediaTek Inc. of Hsinchu, Taiwan and MediaTek USA Inc. of San Jose, 
California (together ``MediaTek''); Realtek Semiconductor Corp. of 
Hsinchu, Taiwan (``Realtek''); and Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, 
California (``Intel''). Id. at 67374. The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations (``OUII'') is participating in the investigation. Id.
    During the course of the investigation, Philips moved to terminate 
the investigation as to various claims, patents, and respondents, 
including LG and MediaTek. See Order No. 19, unreviewed by Comm'n 
Notice (Apr. 15, 2021), Order No. 21, unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (May 
12, 2021), Order No. 26, unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Jun 21, 2021), 
Order 32, unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (July 26, 2021), Order No. 40, 
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Aug. 2, 2021), and Order No. 46, 
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Aug. 10, 2021). The Respondents remaining 
in the investigation are Dell, Hisense, HP, Lenovo, TCL, Realtek, and 
Intel (together, ``the Respondents''). The remaining asserted patent 
claims are: claims 1, 9, 11, 12, and 14 of the '186 patent; and claims 
1, 18, 19, 21, and 25 of the '564 patent.
    On October 21, 2021, the ALJ issued the subject ID. On November 2, 
2021, Philips and OUII each filed petitions for review. Also, on 
November 2, 2021, Respondents Intel, HP, Dell, and Lenovo filed a 
contingent petition for review, and Respondents HP, Realtek, Dell, 
Lenovo, Hisense, and TCL filed a separate contingent petition for 
review. On November 10, 2021, Philips, OUII, and the Respondents each 
filed replies.
    On December 20, 2021, the Commission determined to review the ID in 
part. Specifically, the Commission determined to review the ID's 
findings on claim construction, infringement, validity, and domestic 
industry for both of the '186 and '564 patents. Comm'n Notice of Review 
(Dec. 20, 2021). The Commission asked for briefing on certain issues 
under review and on remedy, bonding, and the public interest. The 
parties filed their initial responses on January 7, 2022 and their 
replies on January 14, 2022.
    Having examined the record of this investigation, including the ID, 
the petitions for review, responses, and other submissions from the 
parties and the public, the Commission has determined that no violation 
of section 337 has occurred. Specifically, the Commission finds that 
the asserted claims of the '186 and '564 patents are not infringed and 
the domestic industry products do not practice the claims of the '186 
and '564 patents. The Commission also takes no position on various 
issues, as set forth in the accompanying Opinion, including on the 
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement, anticipation, 
obviousness, and whether the written description requirement is met for 
the claim terms ``predetermined time'' and ``certificate.'' The 
Commission's determinations are explained more fully in the 
accompanying Opinion. All findings in the ID under review that are 
consistent with the Commission's determinations as set forth in the 
accompanying Opinion are affirmed.
    The Commission vote for this determination took place on March 23, 
2022.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 23, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-06528 Filed 3-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P