Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2019-2020, 17989-17991 [2022-06520]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Notices rotating auger and is the intake point for the snow. Importation of the subassembly whether or not accompanied by, or attached to, additional components including, but not limited to, handle(s), impeller(s), chute(s), track tread(s), or wheel(s) constitutes an unfinished snow thrower for purposes of this investigation. The inclusion in a third country of any components other than the snow thrower sub-assembly does not remove the snow thrower from the scope. A snow thrower is within the scope of this investigation regardless of the origin of its engine. Specifically excluded is merchandise covered by the scope of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain vertical shaft engines between 225cc and 999cc, and parts thereof from the People’s Republic of China. See Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof, from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 12623 (March 4, 2021) and Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order and Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 86 FR 12619 (March 4, 2021). Also specifically excluded is merchandise covered by the scope of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain vertical shaft engines between 99cc and Up to 225cc, and parts thereof from the People’s Republic of China. See Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 99cc and Up to 225cc, and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 023675 (May 4, 2021). The snow throwers subject to this investigation are typically entered under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 8430.20.0060. Certain parts of snow throwers subject to this investigation may also enter under HTSUS 8431.49.9095. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only, and the written description of the merchandise under investigation is dispositive. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Investigation IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences V. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Accept Zhejiang Zhouli’s Response Comment 2: Export Buyer’s Credit Program Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Continue To Apply Adverse Facts Available to the Provision of Electricity for Less Than Adequate Remuneration Comment 4: Countervailability of Other Subsidies Comment 5: Currency Undervaluation Comment 6: Nanjing Chervon Industry Co., Ltd.’s Request VI. Recommendation VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Mar 28, 2022 Jkt 256001 17989 Appendix: AFA Rate Calculation Scope of the Order [FR Doc. 2022–06558 Filed 3–28–22; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE The products covered by this order are certain lined paper products from India. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. International Trade Administration Final Determination of No Shipments [A–533–843] In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found that Goldenpalm had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Following the publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding Goldenpalm, nor has any party submitted record evidence which would call our preliminary determination of no shipments into question. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that Goldenpalm had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with Commerce’s practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Goldenpalm, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.4 BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet), a producer/ exporter subject to this administrative review, made sales of certain lined paper products from India at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2019, through August 31, 2020. In addition, Commerce determines that Goldenpalm Manufacturers PVT Limited (Goldenpalm) had no shipments during the POR. DATES: Applicable March 29, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7851. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On October 1, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.1 On January 26, 2022, Commerce extended these final results by an additional 60 days.2 The current deadline for these final results is March 30, 2022. Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 1 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part; and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 86 FR 54426 (October 1, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Final Results,’’ dated January 26, 2022. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Lined Paper PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Application of Adverse Facts Available For these final results, we continue to find that Magic International Pvt. Ltd. and Marisa International withheld information requested by Commerce, failed to provide the requested information in a timely manner, and significantly impeded the proceeding, warranting a determination on the basis of the facts available under section 776(a) of the Act. Therefore, we continue to find that Magic International Pvt. Ltd. and Marisa International have not acted to the best of their abilities and the application of adverse facts available, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, is warranted. Rates for Non-Selected Companies For the rate for non-selected respondents in an administrative review, generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation. Under section Products from India; 2019–2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 4 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1 17990 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the weighted-average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.’’ In this segment of the proceeding, we calculated a margin for Navneet, the sole mandatory respondent, that was not zero, de minimis, or based on facts available. Accordingly, Commerce is assigning Navneet’s rate to companies not selected for individual examination, which are listed below. Exporter/producer SGM Paper Products ............................ Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 20.22 Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after publication of these final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Analysis of Comments Received Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all All issues raised in the case and appropriate entries of subject rebuttal briefs are addressed in the merchandise in accordance with the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A final results of this review. Pursuant to list of the issues that parties raised and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for Navneet, we to which we responded in the Issues calculated importer-specific ad valorem and Decision Memorandum is attached assessment rates based on the ratio of to this notice as an Appendix. The the total amount of dumping calculated Issues and Decision Memorandum is a for the examined sales to the total public document and is on file entered value of the sales. Where either electronically via Enforcement and the respondent’s weighted-average Compliance’s Antidumping and dumping margin is zero or de minimis, Countervailing Duty Centralized within the meaning of 19 CFR Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed entries without regard to antidumping duties. directly at https://access.trade.gov/ For the companies which were not public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. selected for individual review, we will Changes Since the Preliminary Results assign an assessment rate based on the weighted-average dumping margin Based on a review of the record and calculated for Navneet. The final results comments received from interested of this review shall be the basis for the parties, we made changes to the margin assessment of antidumping duties on analysis in the Preliminary Results entries of merchandise covered by the regarding Navneet’s U.S. date of sale final results of this review and for future variable, product form variable, and deposits of estimated duties, where level of trade variable in the margin applicable.6 program.5 For Goldenpalm, which we Final Results of the Review determined had no shipments during the POR, we will instruct CBP to As a result of this review, Commerce determines that the following weighted- liquidate any suspended entries associated with Goldenpalm pursuant to average dumping margins exist for the the reseller policy.7 period September 1, 2019, through Commerce intends to issue August 31, 2020: assessment instructions to CBP no Weightedearlier than 35 days after the date of average publication of the final results of this Exporter/producer dumping margin review in the Federal Register. If a (percent) timely summons is filed at the U.S. Navneet Education Ltd .......................... 20.22 Court of International Trade, the Magic International Pvt. Ltd .................. 215.93 assessment instructions will direct CBP Marisa International ............................... 215.93 not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a Companies Not Selected for Individual Review Lodha Offset Limited ............................. Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd ................... 5 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 3, 4 and 5. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Mar 28, 2022 Jkt 256001 20.22 20.22 6 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 7 For PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of certain lined paper products from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the most recently established rate for the manufacturer or exporter in a completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the most recently established rate for the manufacturer of the merchandise in a completed segment of the proceeding; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV investigation.8 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of 8 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People’s Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006). E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2022 / Notices their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: March 21, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Revise Programming Code Regarding Costs of Products Sold Only in Third Countries Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Allocate Certain Navneet Trust Expenses to Navneet Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Product Form Variable in the Home Market Program Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Level of Trade for U.S. Sales in the Margin Program Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Revise the U.S. Sale Date in the Margin Program V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–06520 Filed 3–28–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Generic Clearance for Usability Data Collections The Department of Commerce will submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, on or after the date of publication VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Mar 28, 2022 Jkt 256001 of this notice. We invite the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on December 7, 2021, during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Commerce. Title: NIST Generic Clearance for Usability Data Collections. OMB Control Number 0693–0043. Form Number(s): None. Type of Request: Regular submission, extension of a current information collection. Number of Respondents: 150,000. Average Hours per Response: Varied, dependent upon the data collection method used. The possible response time to complete a questionnaire may be 15 minutes or 2 hours to participate in an empirical study. Burden Hours: 100,000. Needs and Uses: NIST will conduct information collections to evaluate the usability and utility of NIST research for measurement and standardization work. These data collections efforts may include, but may not be limited to electronic methodologies, empirical studies, video and audio collections, interview, and questionnaires. Affected Public: Individual or households; State, Local or Tribal Government; Federal Government. Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. This information collection request may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view the Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice on the following website www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function and entering either the title of the collection or the OMB Control Number 0693–0043. Sheleen Dumas, Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Commerce Department. [FR Doc. 2022–06590 Filed 3–28–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–13–P PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17991 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XB914] Endangered and Threatened Species; Initiation of 5-Year Review for the North Pacific Right Whale (Eubalaena japonica) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of initiation of 5-year review; request for information. AGENCY: NMFS announces its intent to conduct a 5-year review of the endangered North Pacific right whale (Eubalaena japonica). NMFS is required by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to conduct 5-year reviews to ensure that listing classifications of species are accurate. The 5-year review must be based on the best scientific and commercial data available at the time of the review. We request submission of any such information on the North Pacific right whale, particularly information on its status, threats, and recovery that has become available since the previous 5-year review was issued in December 2017. DATES: To allow us adequate time to conduct this review, we must receive your information no later than May 31, 2022. However, we will continue to accept new information about any listed species at any time. ADDRESSES: Submit your information, identified by docket number NOAA– NMFS–2022–0038, by either of the following methods: • Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter the above docket number for this notice. Then, click on the Search icon. On the resulting web page, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. • Mail: Submit written information to Jon Kurland, Assistant Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: Records Office. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668. Instructions: NMFS may not consider comments or other information if sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the comment period ends. All comments and information received are a part of the public record and NMFS will post the comments for public viewing on www.regulations.gov SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17989-17991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-843]


Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No 
Shipments; 2019-2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Navneet 
Education Ltd. (Navneet), a producer/exporter subject to this 
administrative review, made sales of certain lined paper products from 
India at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) 
September 1, 2019, through August 31, 2020. In addition, Commerce 
determines that Goldenpalm Manufacturers PVT Limited (Goldenpalm) had 
no shipments during the POR.

DATES: Applicable March 29, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7851.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 1, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
this administrative review.\1\ On January 26, 2022, Commerce extended 
these final results by an additional 60 days.\2\ The current deadline 
for these final results is March 30, 2022. Commerce conducted this 
administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a complete description of 
the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Rescission of 
Administrative Review, in Part; and Preliminary Determination of No 
Shipments; 2019-2020, 86 FR 54426 (October 1, 2021) (Preliminary 
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results,'' 
dated January 26, 2022.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India; 2019-2020,'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order are certain lined paper products 
from India. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found that Goldenpalm 
had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Following the 
publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from 
interested parties regarding Goldenpalm, nor has any party submitted 
record evidence which would call our preliminary determination of no 
shipments into question. Therefore, for the final results, we continue 
to find that Goldenpalm had no shipments of subject merchandise during 
the POR. Accordingly, consistent with Commerce's practice, we intend to 
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any 
existing entries of merchandise produced by Goldenpalm, but exported by 
other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, 
or at the all-others rate.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the 
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application of Adverse Facts Available

    For these final results, we continue to find that Magic 
International Pvt. Ltd. and Marisa International withheld information 
requested by Commerce, failed to provide the requested information in a 
timely manner, and significantly impeded the proceeding, warranting a 
determination on the basis of the facts available under section 776(a) 
of the Act. Therefore, we continue to find that Magic International 
Pvt. Ltd. and Marisa International have not acted to the best of their 
abilities and the application of adverse facts available, pursuant to 
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, is warranted.

Rates for Non-Selected Companies

    For the rate for non-selected respondents in an administrative 
review, generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a 
market economy investigation. Under section

[[Page 17990]]

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an amount 
equal to the weighted-average of the estimated weighted-average dumping 
margins established for exporters and producers individually 
investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins 
determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .'' In this 
segment of the proceeding, we calculated a margin for Navneet, the sole 
mandatory respondent, that was not zero, de minimis, or based on facts 
available. Accordingly, Commerce is assigning Navneet's rate to 
companies not selected for individual examination, which are listed 
below.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties 
raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties, we made changes to the margin analysis in the 
Preliminary Results regarding Navneet's U.S. date of sale variable, 
product form variable, and level of trade variable in the margin 
program.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 3, 4 and 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, Commerce determines that the following 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period September 1, 
2019, through August 31, 2020:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Exporter/producer                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Navneet Education Ltd.......................................       20.22
Magic International Pvt. Ltd................................      215.93
Marisa International........................................      215.93
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Companies Not Selected for Individual Review
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lodha Offset Limited........................................       20.22
Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd.................................       20.22
SGM Paper Products..........................................       20.22
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after publication of these final results in 
the Federal Register, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in 
accordance with the final results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), for Navneet, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem 
assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the 
sales. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is 
zero or de minimis, within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 
importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
    For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we 
will assign an assessment rate based on the weighted-average dumping 
margin calculated for Navneet. The final results of this review shall 
be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of 
merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future 
deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For Goldenpalm, which we determined had no shipments during the 
POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended entries associated 
with Goldenpalm pursuant to the reseller policy.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of certain lined paper products from India entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, as provided for by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the 
companies listed above will be the rate established in the final 
results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by 
manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a 
prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to 
be the most recently established rate for the manufacturer or exporter 
in a completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 
firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-
value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 
will be the most recently established rate for the manufacturer of the 
merchandise in a completed segment of the proceeding; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 
3.91 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV 
investigation.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's 
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of 
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing 
duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Commerce's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of

[[Page 17991]]

their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary 
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written 
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion 
to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply 
with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: March 21, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Analysis of Comments
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Revise Programming Code 
Regarding Costs of Products Sold Only in Third Countries
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Allocate Certain Navneet 
Trust Expenses to Navneet
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Product Form 
Variable in the Home Market Program
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Level of Trade for 
U.S. Sales in the Margin Program
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Revise the U.S. Sale Date in 
the Margin Program
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2022-06520 Filed 3-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P