Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation, 16764-16765 [2022-06208]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
16764
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2022 / Notices
Basin States (Arizona, California, and
Nevada), local and tribal entities, water
districts, and individuals that use
Colorado River water.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 84.
Annual .................................
Annual .................................
Monthly ................................
Annual .................................
LC–72A ..............................
LC–72B ..............................
Custom Forms ....................
Custom Forms ....................
8
12
37
27
10
10
12
25
1
1
12
1
8
12
444
27
1
2
89
11
Total .............................
.............................................
84
........................
........................
491
103
[FR Doc. 2022–06250 Filed 3–23–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1243]
Certain Active Matrix OLED Display
Devices and Components Thereof;
Notice of Commission Decision Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation in Its
Entirety Based on Settlement;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 32) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
terminating the investigation in its
entirety based on settlement. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Houda Morad, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–4716. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
SUMMARY:
17:39 Mar 23, 2022
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
On
February 2, 2021, the Commission
instituted this investigation under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section
337’’), based on a complaint filed by
Solas OLED Ltd. of Dublin, Ireland
(‘‘Solas’’ or ‘‘Complainant’’). See 86 FR
7878–79 (Feb. 2, 2021). The complaint,
as amended and supplemented, alleges
a violation of section 337 based upon
the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain active matrix
OLED display devices and components
thereof by reason of infringement of
claims 13–17 of U.S. Patent No.
7,573,068 (‘‘the ’068 patent’’) and claims
2–40 of U.S. Patent No. 7,868,880 (‘‘the
’880 patent’’). See id. The notice of
investigation names the following
respondents: BOE Technology Group
Co., Ltd. and Beijing BOE Display
Technology Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China,
and BOE Technology America, Inc. of
Santa Clara, California (collectively
‘‘BOE’’); and Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd. of Suwon-si, South Korea; Samsung
Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield
Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Display
Co., Ltd. of Yongin-si, South Korea
(collectively ‘‘Samsung’’). See id. The
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Minutes/
response
Total
responses/
year
Form No.
Jacklynn L. Gould,
Regional Director, Interior Region 8: Lower
Colorado Basin, Bureau of Reclamation.
Number of
respondents
Number
responses/
respondent
Frequency of data collection
(monthly/annual)
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Frequency of Collection: Monthly,
annually, or otherwise as stipulated by
the water user’s Colorado River water
delivery contract with the Secretary of
the Interior.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: None.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 491.
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: See table.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 103 hours.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total
hours/year
Office of Unfair Import Investigations
(‘‘OUII’’) is also a party to the
investigation. See id.
On October 28, 2021, the Commission
partially terminated the investigation as
to the BOE respondents. See Order No.
23 (Oct. 4, 2021), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Oct. 28, 2021).
On October 29, 2021, the Commission
terminated the investigation as to claims
14–16 of the ’068 patent and claims 12,
13, 15–19, 22–24, 34, 35, and 38–40 of
the ’880 patent based on the withdrawal
of the allegations in the complaint as to
those claims. See Order No. 24 (Oct. 5,
2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice
(Oct. 29, 2021).
On December 14, 2021, the
Commission terminated the
investigation as to claims 3–5, 7–9, 11,
20, 21, 25–29, 31–33, 36, and 37 of the
’880 patent based on the withdrawal of
the allegations in the complaint as to
those claims. See Order No. 28 (Nov. 16,
2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice
(Dec. 14, 2021).
On March 1, 2022, Complainant and
the remaining respondents, Samsung,
filed a joint motion to terminate the
investigation in its entirety based on
settlement. On March 3, 2022, OUII
filed a response in support of the joint
motion.
On March 4, 2022, the ALJ issued the
subject ID (Order No. 32) granting the
joint motion. The ID finds that ‘‘[t]he
pending motion for termination
complies with the Commission Rules.’’
See ID at 2. Specifically, the motion
includes confidential and public copies
of the settlement agreement (‘‘the
Agreement’’) in accordance with
Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1), 19 CFR
210.21(b)(1). See id. In addition, as
noted in the ID, the motion states that
‘‘[o]ther than the Agreement, there are
no other agreements, written or oral,
express or implied, between Solas and
Samsung concerning the subject matter
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2022 / Notices
of this Investigation.’’ See id. at 3.
Furthermore, in accordance with
Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2), 19 CFR
210.50(b)(2), the ID finds ‘‘no evidence
indicating that terminating this
investigation based on the Agreement
would be contrary to the public
interest.’’ See id.
No petition for review of the subject
ID was filed. The Commission has
determined not to review the subject ID.
The investigation is terminated.
The Commission’s vote for this
determination took place on March 18,
2022.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 18, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–06208 Filed 3–23–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1286]
Certain Oil-Vaping Cartridges,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing the Same; Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting in Part
Complainant’s Motion To Amend the
Complaint and Notice of Investigation
and To Terminate the Investigation
With Respect to a Respondent
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 20) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’),
granting in part complainant’s motion to
amend the complaint and notice of
investigation and to terminate the
investigation as to respondent BBTank
USA, LLC (‘‘BBTank’’) based upon
withdrawal of allegations in the
complaint.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Mar 23, 2022
Jkt 256001
205–2392. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on November 10, 2021, based on a
complaint filed on behalf of Shenzhen
Smoore Technology Limited (‘‘Smoore’’)
of China. 86 FR 62567–69 (Nov. 10,
2021). The complaint, as supplemented,
alleged violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain oil-vaping
cartridges, components thereof, and
products containing the same by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 10,357,623; 10,791,763;
10,791,762; and U.S. Registered
Trademark No. 5,633,060. Id. at 62567–
68. The complaint further alleged that a
domestic industry exists. Id. at 62568.
The Commission’s notice of
investigation named numerous
respondents including BBTank of
Lambertville, Michigan; BoldCarts.com
of Tempe, Arizona; Bold Crafts, Inc. of
Irvine, California; Green Tank
Technologies Corp. of Canada; Blinc
Group Holdings, LLC of New York, New
York; and BulkCarts.com of Canton,
Michigan. Id. at 62568. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is
also named as a party in this
investigation. Id.
On February 1, 2022, Smoore filed a
motion for leave to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation
pursuant to Commission Rule
210.14(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.14(b)(1).
Specifically, Smoore’s motion requests
to: (1) Change the corporate entity name
of Respondents BoldCarts.com and Bold
Crafts, Inc., to Bold Crafts, LLC d/b/a
Bold Carts and BoldCarts.com; (2)
change the corporate entity name of
Respondent Green Tank Technologies
Corp. to Greentank Technologies Corp.;
(3) change the corporate entity name of
Blinc Group Holdings, LLC, to The
Blinc Group Inc.; (4) change the
corporate entity name of Respondent
BulkCarts.com to Zachary R. Esquivel d/
b/a ZRE Enterprises Inc. and
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16765
ceramiccellcartridges.com; (5) substitute
Respondent BBTank with proposed
respondents DES Products Ltd. d/b/a
O2VAPE and TCM Enterprises, LLC d/
b/a O2VAPE; (6) terminate the
investigation as to Respondent BBTank
based on withdrawal of allegations in
the complaint; (7) delete paragraph 148
of the complaint alleging trademark
infringement by Respondent BBTank;
(8) name additional proposed
respondent AEG Holdings (HK) Ltd. n/
k/a AVD Holdings Ltd.; and (9) replace
Exhibit 36 to the complaint. See Order
No. 20 at 1–2 (Feb. 23, 2022). OUII,
BBTank, and proposed respondents DES
Products Ltd. and TCM Enterprises,
LLC, filed responses to Smoore’s
motion. Id. at 2.
On February 23, 2022, the ALJ issued
the subject ID granting in part the
motion. Id. at 11. The ID granted
Smoore leave to amend the complaint
and notice of investigation to: (1)
Change the names of Respondents
BoldCarts.com and Bold Crafts, Inc., to
Bold Crafts, LLC d/b/a Bold Carts and
BoldCarts.com; (2) change the name of
Respondent Green Tank Technologies
Corp. to Greentank Technologies Corp.;
(3) change the name of Blinc Group
Holdings, LLC, to The Blinc Group Inc.;
and (4) replace Exhibit 36 to the
complaint. Id. at 3–4, 10. The ID also
found that Smoore’s request to
terminate BBTank from the
investigation complies with
Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1), 19 CFR
210.21(a)(1), and that no extraordinary
circumstances warrant denying the
request. Id. at 9–10. No petitions for
review were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID. The complaint
and notice of investigation are amended
as indicated above, and Respondent
BBTank is hereby terminated from the
investigation.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on March 18,
2022.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part
210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 18, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022–06207 Filed 3–23–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16764-16765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06208]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1243]
Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components
Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial
Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on
Settlement; Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 32) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') terminating the investigation in its entirety based on
settlement. The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4716. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 2, 2021, the Commission
instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), based on a
complaint filed by Solas OLED Ltd. of Dublin, Ireland (``Solas'' or
``Complainant''). See 86 FR 7878-79 (Feb. 2, 2021). The complaint, as
amended and supplemented, alleges a violation of section 337 based upon
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and
the sale within the United States after importation of certain active
matrix OLED display devices and components thereof by reason of
infringement of claims 13-17 of U.S. Patent No. 7,573,068 (``the '068
patent'') and claims 2-40 of U.S. Patent No. 7,868,880 (``the '880
patent''). See id. The notice of investigation names the following
respondents: BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Beijing BOE Display
Technology Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China, and BOE Technology America,
Inc. of Santa Clara, California (collectively ``BOE''); and Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon-si, South Korea; Samsung Electronics
America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Display Co.,
Ltd. of Yongin-si, South Korea (collectively ``Samsung''). See id. The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') is also a party to
the investigation. See id.
On October 28, 2021, the Commission partially terminated the
investigation as to the BOE respondents. See Order No. 23 (Oct. 4,
2021), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 28, 2021).
On October 29, 2021, the Commission terminated the investigation as
to claims 14-16 of the '068 patent and claims 12, 13, 15-19, 22-24, 34,
35, and 38-40 of the '880 patent based on the withdrawal of the
allegations in the complaint as to those claims. See Order No. 24 (Oct.
5, 2021), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 29, 2021).
On December 14, 2021, the Commission terminated the investigation
as to claims 3-5, 7-9, 11, 20, 21, 25-29, 31-33, 36, and 37 of the '880
patent based on the withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint as
to those claims. See Order No. 28 (Nov. 16, 2021), unreviewed by Comm'n
Notice (Dec. 14, 2021).
On March 1, 2022, Complainant and the remaining respondents,
Samsung, filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation in its
entirety based on settlement. On March 3, 2022, OUII filed a response
in support of the joint motion.
On March 4, 2022, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 32)
granting the joint motion. The ID finds that ``[t]he pending motion for
termination complies with the Commission Rules.'' See ID at 2.
Specifically, the motion includes confidential and public copies of the
settlement agreement (``the Agreement'') in accordance with Commission
Rule 210.21(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.21(b)(1). See id. In addition, as noted
in the ID, the motion states that ``[o]ther than the Agreement, there
are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between
Solas and Samsung concerning the subject matter
[[Page 16765]]
of this Investigation.'' See id. at 3. Furthermore, in accordance with
Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(2), the ID finds ``no
evidence indicating that terminating this investigation based on the
Agreement would be contrary to the public interest.'' See id.
No petition for review of the subject ID was filed. The Commission
has determined not to review the subject ID. The investigation is
terminated.
The Commission's vote for this determination took place on March
18, 2022.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 18, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-06208 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
