Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation, 16764-16765 [2022-06208]

Download as PDF 16764 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2022 / Notices Basin States (Arizona, California, and Nevada), local and tribal entities, water districts, and individuals that use Colorado River water. Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 84. Annual ................................. Annual ................................. Monthly ................................ Annual ................................. LC–72A .............................. LC–72B .............................. Custom Forms .................... Custom Forms .................... 8 12 37 27 10 10 12 25 1 1 12 1 8 12 444 27 1 2 89 11 Total ............................. ............................................. 84 ........................ ........................ 491 103 [FR Doc. 2022–06250 Filed 3–23–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4332–90–P [Investigation No. 337–TA–1243] Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 32) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the investigation in its entirety based on settlement. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–4716. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the SUMMARY: 17:39 Mar 23, 2022 Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. On February 2, 2021, the Commission instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on a complaint filed by Solas OLED Ltd. of Dublin, Ireland (‘‘Solas’’ or ‘‘Complainant’’). See 86 FR 7878–79 (Feb. 2, 2021). The complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleges a violation of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain active matrix OLED display devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of claims 13–17 of U.S. Patent No. 7,573,068 (‘‘the ’068 patent’’) and claims 2–40 of U.S. Patent No. 7,868,880 (‘‘the ’880 patent’’). See id. The notice of investigation names the following respondents: BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Beijing BOE Display Technology Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China, and BOE Technology America, Inc. of Santa Clara, California (collectively ‘‘BOE’’); and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon-si, South Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Display Co., Ltd. of Yongin-si, South Korea (collectively ‘‘Samsung’’). See id. The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION VerDate Sep<11>2014 Minutes/ response Total responses/ year Form No. Jacklynn L. Gould, Regional Director, Interior Region 8: Lower Colorado Basin, Bureau of Reclamation. Number of respondents Number responses/ respondent Frequency of data collection (monthly/annual) An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Frequency of Collection: Monthly, annually, or otherwise as stipulated by the water user’s Colorado River water delivery contract with the Secretary of the Interior. Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: None. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 491. Estimated Completion Time per Response: See table. Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 103 hours. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit. Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Total hours/year Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party to the investigation. See id. On October 28, 2021, the Commission partially terminated the investigation as to the BOE respondents. See Order No. 23 (Oct. 4, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Oct. 28, 2021). On October 29, 2021, the Commission terminated the investigation as to claims 14–16 of the ’068 patent and claims 12, 13, 15–19, 22–24, 34, 35, and 38–40 of the ’880 patent based on the withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint as to those claims. See Order No. 24 (Oct. 5, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Oct. 29, 2021). On December 14, 2021, the Commission terminated the investigation as to claims 3–5, 7–9, 11, 20, 21, 25–29, 31–33, 36, and 37 of the ’880 patent based on the withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint as to those claims. See Order No. 28 (Nov. 16, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Dec. 14, 2021). On March 1, 2022, Complainant and the remaining respondents, Samsung, filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on settlement. On March 3, 2022, OUII filed a response in support of the joint motion. On March 4, 2022, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 32) granting the joint motion. The ID finds that ‘‘[t]he pending motion for termination complies with the Commission Rules.’’ See ID at 2. Specifically, the motion includes confidential and public copies of the settlement agreement (‘‘the Agreement’’) in accordance with Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.21(b)(1). See id. In addition, as noted in the ID, the motion states that ‘‘[o]ther than the Agreement, there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between Solas and Samsung concerning the subject matter E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2022 / Notices of this Investigation.’’ See id. at 3. Furthermore, in accordance with Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(2), the ID finds ‘‘no evidence indicating that terminating this investigation based on the Agreement would be contrary to the public interest.’’ See id. No petition for review of the subject ID was filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The investigation is terminated. The Commission’s vote for this determination took place on March 18, 2022. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 18, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–06208 Filed 3–23–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1286] Certain Oil-Vaping Cartridges, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting in Part Complainant’s Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation and To Terminate the Investigation With Respect to a Respondent U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 20) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’), granting in part complainant’s motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation and to terminate the investigation as to respondent BBTank USA, LLC (‘‘BBTank’’) based upon withdrawal of allegations in the complaint. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Mar 23, 2022 Jkt 256001 205–2392. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on November 10, 2021, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Shenzhen Smoore Technology Limited (‘‘Smoore’’) of China. 86 FR 62567–69 (Nov. 10, 2021). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain oil-vaping cartridges, components thereof, and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,357,623; 10,791,763; 10,791,762; and U.S. Registered Trademark No. 5,633,060. Id. at 62567– 68. The complaint further alleged that a domestic industry exists. Id. at 62568. The Commission’s notice of investigation named numerous respondents including BBTank of Lambertville, Michigan; BoldCarts.com of Tempe, Arizona; Bold Crafts, Inc. of Irvine, California; Green Tank Technologies Corp. of Canada; Blinc Group Holdings, LLC of New York, New York; and BulkCarts.com of Canton, Michigan. Id. at 62568. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also named as a party in this investigation. Id. On February 1, 2022, Smoore filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.14(b)(1). Specifically, Smoore’s motion requests to: (1) Change the corporate entity name of Respondents BoldCarts.com and Bold Crafts, Inc., to Bold Crafts, LLC d/b/a Bold Carts and BoldCarts.com; (2) change the corporate entity name of Respondent Green Tank Technologies Corp. to Greentank Technologies Corp.; (3) change the corporate entity name of Blinc Group Holdings, LLC, to The Blinc Group Inc.; (4) change the corporate entity name of Respondent BulkCarts.com to Zachary R. Esquivel d/ b/a ZRE Enterprises Inc. and PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16765 ceramiccellcartridges.com; (5) substitute Respondent BBTank with proposed respondents DES Products Ltd. d/b/a O2VAPE and TCM Enterprises, LLC d/ b/a O2VAPE; (6) terminate the investigation as to Respondent BBTank based on withdrawal of allegations in the complaint; (7) delete paragraph 148 of the complaint alleging trademark infringement by Respondent BBTank; (8) name additional proposed respondent AEG Holdings (HK) Ltd. n/ k/a AVD Holdings Ltd.; and (9) replace Exhibit 36 to the complaint. See Order No. 20 at 1–2 (Feb. 23, 2022). OUII, BBTank, and proposed respondents DES Products Ltd. and TCM Enterprises, LLC, filed responses to Smoore’s motion. Id. at 2. On February 23, 2022, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting in part the motion. Id. at 11. The ID granted Smoore leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to: (1) Change the names of Respondents BoldCarts.com and Bold Crafts, Inc., to Bold Crafts, LLC d/b/a Bold Carts and BoldCarts.com; (2) change the name of Respondent Green Tank Technologies Corp. to Greentank Technologies Corp.; (3) change the name of Blinc Group Holdings, LLC, to The Blinc Group Inc.; and (4) replace Exhibit 36 to the complaint. Id. at 3–4, 10. The ID also found that Smoore’s request to terminate BBTank from the investigation complies with Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1), 19 CFR 210.21(a)(1), and that no extraordinary circumstances warrant denying the request. Id. at 9–10. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The complaint and notice of investigation are amended as indicated above, and Respondent BBTank is hereby terminated from the investigation. The Commission vote for this determination took place on March 18, 2022. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 210. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 18, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–06207 Filed 3–23–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16764-16765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06208]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1243]


Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components 
Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on 
Settlement; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 32) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') terminating the investigation in its entirety based on 
settlement. The investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4716. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 2, 2021, the Commission 
instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), based on a 
complaint filed by Solas OLED Ltd. of Dublin, Ireland (``Solas'' or 
``Complainant''). See 86 FR 7878-79 (Feb. 2, 2021). The complaint, as 
amended and supplemented, alleges a violation of section 337 based upon 
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and 
the sale within the United States after importation of certain active 
matrix OLED display devices and components thereof by reason of 
infringement of claims 13-17 of U.S. Patent No. 7,573,068 (``the '068 
patent'') and claims 2-40 of U.S. Patent No. 7,868,880 (``the '880 
patent''). See id. The notice of investigation names the following 
respondents: BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Beijing BOE Display 
Technology Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China, and BOE Technology America, 
Inc. of Santa Clara, California (collectively ``BOE''); and Samsung 
Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon-si, South Korea; Samsung Electronics 
America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Display Co., 
Ltd. of Yongin-si, South Korea (collectively ``Samsung''). See id. The 
Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') is also a party to 
the investigation. See id.
    On October 28, 2021, the Commission partially terminated the 
investigation as to the BOE respondents. See Order No. 23 (Oct. 4, 
2021), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 28, 2021).
    On October 29, 2021, the Commission terminated the investigation as 
to claims 14-16 of the '068 patent and claims 12, 13, 15-19, 22-24, 34, 
35, and 38-40 of the '880 patent based on the withdrawal of the 
allegations in the complaint as to those claims. See Order No. 24 (Oct. 
5, 2021), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 29, 2021).
    On December 14, 2021, the Commission terminated the investigation 
as to claims 3-5, 7-9, 11, 20, 21, 25-29, 31-33, 36, and 37 of the '880 
patent based on the withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint as 
to those claims. See Order No. 28 (Nov. 16, 2021), unreviewed by Comm'n 
Notice (Dec. 14, 2021).
    On March 1, 2022, Complainant and the remaining respondents, 
Samsung, filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation in its 
entirety based on settlement. On March 3, 2022, OUII filed a response 
in support of the joint motion.
    On March 4, 2022, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 32) 
granting the joint motion. The ID finds that ``[t]he pending motion for 
termination complies with the Commission Rules.'' See ID at 2. 
Specifically, the motion includes confidential and public copies of the 
settlement agreement (``the Agreement'') in accordance with Commission 
Rule 210.21(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.21(b)(1). See id. In addition, as noted 
in the ID, the motion states that ``[o]ther than the Agreement, there 
are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between 
Solas and Samsung concerning the subject matter

[[Page 16765]]

of this Investigation.'' See id. at 3. Furthermore, in accordance with 
Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(2), the ID finds ``no 
evidence indicating that terminating this investigation based on the 
Agreement would be contrary to the public interest.'' See id.
    No petition for review of the subject ID was filed. The Commission 
has determined not to review the subject ID. The investigation is 
terminated.
    The Commission's vote for this determination took place on March 
18, 2022.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 18, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-06208 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P