Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Harmonize Various Processes Under Options 3, Section 20 Across the Affiliated Nasdaq Options Exchanges, 16539-16542 [2022-06100]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices
annual burden associated with Rule
15c3–4 for the 16 respondents (nine
OTC derivatives dealers, six ANC firms,
and five SBSDs) will be approximately
6,533 hours per year.
The records required to be made
pursuant to the Rule and the results of
the periodic reviews conducted under
paragraph (d) of Rule 15c3–4 must be
preserved under Rule 17a–4 of the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.17a–4) for a
period of not less than three years, the
first two years in an easily accessible
place. The Commission will not
generally publish or make available to
any person notices or reports received
pursuant to the Rule. The statutory basis
for the Commission’s refusal to disclose
such information to the public is the
exemption contained in section (b)(4) of
the Freedom of Information Act (5
U.S.C. 552), which essentially provides
that the requirement of public
dissemination does not apply to
commercial or financial information
which is privileged or confidential.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website:
www.reginfo.gov. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an
email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: March 18, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
20:07 Mar 22, 2022
[Release No. 34–94457; File No. SR–NYSE–
2021–44]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change
To Amend Rules 7.31, 7.35, 7.35B,
7.35C, 98, and 104 Relating to the
Closing Auction
March 17, 2022.
On September 3, 2021, New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend Rules 7.31 (Orders and
Modifiers), 7.35 (General), 7.35B (DMMFacilitated Closing Auctions), 7.35C
(Exchange-Facilitated Auctions), 98
(Operation of a DMM Unit), and 104
(Dealings and Responsibilities of
DMMs) relating to the Closing Auction.
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on September 22, 2021.3 On
November 1, 2021, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the Commission
extended the time period within which
to approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change to December 21,
2021.5 The Commission has received
two comment letters on the proposal.6
On December 17, 2021, the Commission
instituted proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 7 to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change.8
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 9 provides
that, after initiating proceedings, the
Commission shall issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change not later than 180 days after
1 15
[FR Doc. 2022–06151 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Jkt 256001
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93037
(Sept. 16, 2021), 86 FR 52719 (Sept. 22, 2021) (SR–
NYSE–2021–44) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93488
(Nov. 1, 2021), 86 FR 61352 (Nov. 5, 2021).
6 See Anonymous Letter (Sept. 27, 2021); Letter
to J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary,
Commission, from Richard Grant, General Counsel,
GTS Securities, LLC (Mar. 16, 2022).
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93809
(Dec. 17, 2021), 86 FR 73060 (Dec. 23, 2021).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16539
the date of publication of notice of filing
of the proposed rule change. The
Commission may, however, extend the
period for issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change
by not more than 60 days if the
Commission determines that a longer
period is appropriate and publishes the
reasons for such determination. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
September 22, 2021.10 The 180th day
after publication of the proposed rule
change is March 21, 2022.
The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change.
The Commission is extending the time
period for approving or disapproving
the proposed rule change for an
additional 60 days.
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,11 designates May 20, 2022, as the
date by which the Commission shall
either approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change (File Number SR–
NYSE–2021–44).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–06105 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–94445; File No. SR–ISE–
2022–08]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Harmonize Various
Processes Under Options 3, Section 20
Across the Affiliated Nasdaq Options
Exchanges
March 17, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 8,
2022, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
10 See
Notice, supra note 3.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
11 15
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
16540
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes Exhibit I
Caption—Harmonize various processes
under Options 3, Section 20 across the
affiliated Nasdaq options exchanges.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/ise/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to harmonize
its existing processes with those of its
affiliate Nasdaq Phlx LLC (‘‘Phlx’’)
concerning the review of decisions on
appeal under Options 3, Section 20. The
Exchange also proposes a number of
non-substantive changes. Each change is
discussed in detail below.
Appeal
Today, Options 3, Section 20(k)
governs the appeal process for
determinations by Exchange staff made
under this Rule, including obvious error
determinations. Specifically, if a
Member affected by a determination
under this Rule so requests within the
permitted time period, an Exchange
Review Council panel will review
decisions made by the Official under
Options 3, Section 20, including
whether an obvious error occurred and
whether the correct determination was
made. A request for review on appeal
must be made in writing via email or
other electronic means specified from
time to time by the Exchange in an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Mar 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
Options Trader Alert distributed to
Members within thirty (30) minutes
after the party making the appeal is
given notification of the initial
determination being appealed. The
Exchange Review Council panel shall
review the facts and render a decision
as soon as practicable, but generally on
the same trading day as the execution(s)
under review. On requests for appeal
received after 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time, a
decision will be rendered as soon as
practicable, but in no case later than the
trading day following the date of the
execution under review. Furthermore, if
the Exchange Review Council panel
votes to uphold the decision made
under this Rule, the Exchange will
assess a fee (‘‘Appeal Fee’’) of $5,000
against the Member(s) who initiated the
request for appeal.
The Exchange proposes generally to
maintain its current appeal process with
certain adjustments to harmonize its
process with that of its affiliate, Phlx.
First, while Phlx similarly requires the
parties to submit a request for review
within thirty (30) minutes of being
notified of the determination being
appealed, Phlx also provides parties
with additional time to submit their
request if the notification occurs later in
the trading day. In particular, if the
notification is made after 3:30 p.m.
Eastern Time, either party has until 9:30
a.m. Eastern Time on the next trading
day to submit a request for review.3
Similar to Phlx, the Exchange believes
that this flexibility will be helpful for
Members in submitting their appeal
requests in a timely manner,
particularly where notification of the
Official’s decision was received later in
the trading day, and therefore proposes
to adopt this provision in Options 3,
Section 20(k)(2).
Second, the Exchange proposes to
amend its provisions for when the
Exchange Review Council panel must
render a decision on requests for appeal
by harmonizing to Phlx’s process.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes in
Options 3, Section 20(k)(2) that the
Exchange Review Council panel shall
review the facts and render a decision
on the day of the transaction, or the next
trade day in the case where a request is
properly made after 3:30 p.m. on the
day of the transaction or where the
request is properly made the next trade
day.4 The proposed language modifies
the current process by extending the
current cutoff time from 3:00 to 3:30
p.m. Eastern Time for the Exchange
Review Council panel to render a
See Phlx Options 3, Section 20(l).
See Phlx Options 3, Section 20(l) for analogous
language.
3
4
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
decision on the next trading day, and by
accommodating situations where parties
properly bring an appeal request on the
next trading day.
Third, the Exchange proposes to
decrease the Appeal Fee from $5,000 to
$500 to align to Phlx’s Appeal Fee.5
Non-Substantive Changes
In Options 3, Section 20(b)(1), the
Exchange proposes a non-substantive,
clarifying change to replace the
reference to ‘‘opening rotation’’ to
‘‘Opening Process,’’ and specify that the
Opening Process is defined in Options
3, Section 8. The Exchange also
proposes non-substantive changes to
replace references to ‘‘Market Control’’
with ‘‘Official’’ 6 throughout Options 3,
Section 20. At the time of adoption, the
term Market Control referred to
designated personnel in the Exchange’s
market control center that were
responsible for administering the
provisions of the Rule.7 The Exchange
has since updated the terminology for
such personnel as Officials,8 and
therefore proposes to update the old
references accordingly.9 The Exchange
notes that its affiliated options
exchanges similarly reference Officials
as the persons responsible for
administering their obvious error
rules.10
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,11 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,12
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest and
because it is not designed to permit
5 See Phlx Options 3, Section 20(l). The Nasdaq
Options Market (‘‘NOM’’) and BX Options (‘‘BX’’)
also have identical $500 Appeal Fees. See NOM and
BX Options 3, Section 20(k)(4).
6 For purposes of Options 3, Section 20, an
Official is an Officer of the Exchange or such other
employee designee of the Exchange that is trained
in the application of this Rule. See Options 3,
Section 20(a)(3).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44376
(June 1, 2001), 66 FR 30772 (June 7, 2001) (SR–ISE–
00–19).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74896
(May 7, 2015), 80 FR 27373 (May 13, 2015) (SR–
ISE–2015–18).
9 In particular, the Exchange proposes to update
the following subparagraphs in Options 3, Section
20: (c)(2), (d)(2), (g), (h), (i), (l)(1)(A), (l)(1)(B),
(l)(1)(C), and (l)(2)(A). The Exchange also proposes
to update Supplementary Material .03 to Options 3,
Section 20.
10 See BX, NOM, and Phlx Options 3, Section 20.
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices
unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange further believes that its
proposal to amend the current appeal
process to harmonize with Phlx’s appeal
process is consistent with the Act
because it will continue to afford
Members with due process in
connection with decisions made by
Officials under Options 3, Section 20
that the Member may feel warrants
review. As discussed above, the
proposal would allow either party until
9:30 a.m. the next trading to submit a
request for review if notification is made
after 3:30 p.m., which the Exchange
believes will be helpful for Members in
submitting their appeal requests in a
timely manner. Furthermore, the
proposal provides the Exchange Review
Council panel additional time and
flexibility to render decisions on
requests for appeal in cases where a
request is properly made after 3:30 p.m.
on the day of the transaction or where
the request is properly made the next
trade day, and is designed to reduce
administrative burden on the Exchange.
As it relates to the Appeal Fee, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
reduction of the fee from $5,000 to $500
is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it aligns to the
Appeal Fee assessed by its affiliates 13
and by other options exchanges,14 and
will be applied uniformly to all
Members.
Ultimately, the proposed changes to
the appeal process are intended to align
certain time frames and the Appeal Fee
with those of its affiliates in order to
provide more consistent rules and
procedures across the affiliated options
exchanges owned by Nasdaq, Inc.
Consistent rules and procedures, in
turn, would simplify and streamline the
regulatory requirements and increase
the understanding of the Exchange’s
operations for Members of the Exchange
that are also members on the Exchange’s
affiliated options exchanges. Greater
harmonization across the affiliated
options exchanges will result in greater
uniformity, rules that are easier to
follow and understand, and more
efficient regulatory compliance, thereby
contributing to the protection of
investors and the public interest. As
such, the proposed rule change would
foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities and would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
See supra note 5.
See, e.g., Cboe BZX Exchange Rule 20.6(l)(5)
and MIAX Options Exchange Rule 521(l)(2).
13
14
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Mar 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
Lastly, the Exchange believes that the
proposed non-substantive changes to
replace all instances of Market Control
with Official, and to replace opening
rotation with Opening Process, will add
clarity, transparency, and consistency to
the Exchange’s rules. The Exchange
believes that market participants would
benefit from the increased clarity,
thereby reducing potential confusion,
and ensuring that market participants
and investors can more easily navigate
and understand the Exchange’s rules.
For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposal is consistent
with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The changes
are designed to provide greater
harmonization among similar rules and
processes across the Exchange’s
affiliated options exchanges, resulting in
more efficient regulatory compliance for
common members.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 15 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.16
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
15
16
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16541
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ISE–2022–08 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2022–08. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer
to File Number SR–ISE–2022–08 and
should be submitted on or before April
13, 2022.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
16542
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–06100 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 11688]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
ACTION:
Notice of a modified system of
records.
The information in this
system of records, Risk Analysis and
Management Records, supports the
vetting of directors, officers, or other
employees of organizations who apply
for Department of State contracts,
grants, cooperative agreements, or other
funding; and individuals who may
benefit from such funding. The
information collected from these
organizations and individuals is
specifically used to conduct screening
to ensure that Department funds are not
used to provide support to entities or
individuals deemed to be a risk to U.S.
national security interests.
DATES: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552a(e)(4) and (11), this system of
records notice is effective upon
publication, with the exception of the
routine uses (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) that
are subject to a 30-day period during
which interested persons may submit
comments to the Department. Please
submit any comments by April 22, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Questions can be submitted
by mail, email, or by calling Eric F.
Stein, the Senior Agency Official for
Privacy on (202) 485–2051. If mail,
please write to: U.S Department of State;
Office of Global Information Systems,
A/GIS; Room 1417, 2201 C St. NW,
Washington, DC 20520. If email, please
address the email to the Senior Agency
Official for Privacy, Eric F. Stein, at
Privacy@state.gov. Please write ‘‘Risk
Analysis and Management Records,
State–78’’ on the envelope or the subject
line of your email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
F. Stein, Senior Agency Official for
Privacy; U.S. Department of State; Office
of Global Information Services, A/GIS;
Room 1417, 2201 C St. NW,
Washington, DC 20520 or by calling on
(202) 485–2051.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
17
17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Mar 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
This
notice is being modified to reflect new
OMB guidance, changes to the
categories of records and security
classification. The modified system of
records notice includes substantive
revisions and additions to the following
sections: Dates, Security Classification,
System Location, Categories of
Individuals Covered by the System,
Categories of Records in the System,
Routine Uses of Records, Retention and
Disposal of Records, and Exemptions
Promulgated. In addition, the
Department is taking this opportunity to
make minor administrative updates to
the following sections: Addresses, For
Further Information Contact, and
History.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
Risk Analysis and Management
Records, State–78.
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
directors, program managers, chief of
party for the program and other
individuals employed by the
organization. The Privacy Act defines an
individual at 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(2) as a
United States citizen or lawful
permanent resident.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Information in this system includes:
Name, aliases, date and place of birth,
gender (as shown in a governmentissued foreign or U.S. photo ID),
citizenship(s), government-issued
identification information (including
but not limited to Social Security
number if U.S. citizen or Legal
Permanent Resident, passport number,
or any other numbers originated by a
government that specifically identifies
an individual), mailing address,
telephone numbers, email, social media
information, current employer
organizational and project title.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Unclassified.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S):
Information is collected from the
record subjects themselves and also
from public sources, agencies
conducting national security screening,
law enforcement and intelligence
agency records, and other government
databases.
Director, Office of Risk Analysis and
Management (RAM) 2201 C St. NW,
Washington, DC 20520, RAM@state.gov.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Office of Risk Analysis and
Management (RAM), Department of
State, Washington, DC, 2201 C St. NW,
Washington, DC 20520.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
18 U.S.C. 2339A, 2339B, 2339C; 22
U.S.C. 2151 et seq.; E.O. 13224, 13099
and 12947; and Homeland Security
Presidential Directive–6.
PURPOSE(S) OF THE SYSTEM:
The information in the system
supports the vetting of directors,
officers, or other employees of
organizations who apply for Department
of State contracts, grants, cooperative
agreements, or other funding; and
individuals who may benefit from such
funding. The information collected from
these organizations and individuals is
specifically used to conduct screening
to ensure that Department funds are not
used to provide support to entities or
individuals deemed to be a risk to U.S.
national security interests.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
The system covers key personnel of
organizations that have applied for
contracts, grants, cooperative
agreements, or other funding from the
Department of State; and individuals
who may benefit from such funding.
These individuals may include but are
not limited to principal officers or
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Risk Analysis and Management
Records may be disclosed:
(a.) To appropriate agencies, entities,
and persons when (1) the Department of
State suspects or has confirmed that
there has been a breach of the system of
records; (2) the Department of State has
determined that as a result of the
suspected or confirmed breach there is
a risk of harm to individuals, the
Department of State (including its
information systems, programs, and
operations), the Federal Government, or
national security; and (3) the disclosure
made to such agencies, entities, and
persons is reasonably necessary to assist
in connection with the Department of
State efforts to respond to the suspected
or confirmed breach or to prevent,
minimize, or remedy such harm.
(b.) To another Federal agency or
Federal entity, when the Department of
State determines that information from
this system of records is reasonably
necessary to assist the recipient agency
or entity in (1) responding to a
suspected or confirmed breach or (2)
preventing, minimizing, or remedying
the risk of harm to individuals, the
recipient agency or entity (including its
information systems, programs, and
operations), the Federal Government, or
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16539-16542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06100]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-94445; File No. SR-ISE-2022-08]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Harmonize
Various Processes Under Options 3, Section 20 Across the Affiliated
Nasdaq Options Exchanges
March 17, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 8, 2022, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and
[[Page 16540]]
III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes Exhibit I Caption--Harmonize various
processes under Options 3, Section 20 across the affiliated Nasdaq
options exchanges.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/ise/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to harmonize its existing processes with
those of its affiliate Nasdaq Phlx LLC (``Phlx'') concerning the review
of decisions on appeal under Options 3, Section 20. The Exchange also
proposes a number of non-substantive changes. Each change is discussed
in detail below.
Appeal
Today, Options 3, Section 20(k) governs the appeal process for
determinations by Exchange staff made under this Rule, including
obvious error determinations. Specifically, if a Member affected by a
determination under this Rule so requests within the permitted time
period, an Exchange Review Council panel will review decisions made by
the Official under Options 3, Section 20, including whether an obvious
error occurred and whether the correct determination was made. A
request for review on appeal must be made in writing via email or other
electronic means specified from time to time by the Exchange in an
Options Trader Alert distributed to Members within thirty (30) minutes
after the party making the appeal is given notification of the initial
determination being appealed. The Exchange Review Council panel shall
review the facts and render a decision as soon as practicable, but
generally on the same trading day as the execution(s) under review. On
requests for appeal received after 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time, a decision
will be rendered as soon as practicable, but in no case later than the
trading day following the date of the execution under review.
Furthermore, if the Exchange Review Council panel votes to uphold the
decision made under this Rule, the Exchange will assess a fee (``Appeal
Fee'') of $5,000 against the Member(s) who initiated the request for
appeal.
The Exchange proposes generally to maintain its current appeal
process with certain adjustments to harmonize its process with that of
its affiliate, Phlx. First, while Phlx similarly requires the parties
to submit a request for review within thirty (30) minutes of being
notified of the determination being appealed, Phlx also provides
parties with additional time to submit their request if the
notification occurs later in the trading day. In particular, if the
notification is made after 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time, either party has
until 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time on the next trading day to submit a
request for review.\3\ Similar to Phlx, the Exchange believes that this
flexibility will be helpful for Members in submitting their appeal
requests in a timely manner, particularly where notification of the
Official's decision was received later in the trading day, and
therefore proposes to adopt this provision in Options 3, Section
20(k)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Phlx Options 3, Section 20(l).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the Exchange proposes to amend its provisions for when the
Exchange Review Council panel must render a decision on requests for
appeal by harmonizing to Phlx's process. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes in Options 3, Section 20(k)(2) that the Exchange Review
Council panel shall review the facts and render a decision on the day
of the transaction, or the next trade day in the case where a request
is properly made after 3:30 p.m. on the day of the transaction or where
the request is properly made the next trade day.\4\ The proposed
language modifies the current process by extending the current cutoff
time from 3:00 to 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time for the Exchange Review
Council panel to render a decision on the next trading day, and by
accommodating situations where parties properly bring an appeal request
on the next trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Phlx Options 3, Section 20(l) for analogous language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, the Exchange proposes to decrease the Appeal Fee from $5,000
to $500 to align to Phlx's Appeal Fee.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Phlx Options 3, Section 20(l). The Nasdaq Options Market
(``NOM'') and BX Options (``BX'') also have identical $500 Appeal
Fees. See NOM and BX Options 3, Section 20(k)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Substantive Changes
In Options 3, Section 20(b)(1), the Exchange proposes a non-
substantive, clarifying change to replace the reference to ``opening
rotation'' to ``Opening Process,'' and specify that the Opening Process
is defined in Options 3, Section 8. The Exchange also proposes non-
substantive changes to replace references to ``Market Control'' with
``Official'' \6\ throughout Options 3, Section 20. At the time of
adoption, the term Market Control referred to designated personnel in
the Exchange's market control center that were responsible for
administering the provisions of the Rule.\7\ The Exchange has since
updated the terminology for such personnel as Officials,\8\ and
therefore proposes to update the old references accordingly.\9\ The
Exchange notes that its affiliated options exchanges similarly
reference Officials as the persons responsible for administering their
obvious error rules.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For purposes of Options 3, Section 20, an Official is an
Officer of the Exchange or such other employee designee of the
Exchange that is trained in the application of this Rule. See
Options 3, Section 20(a)(3).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44376 (June 1,
2001), 66 FR 30772 (June 7, 2001) (SR-ISE-00-19).
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74896 (May 7, 2015),
80 FR 27373 (May 13, 2015) (SR-ISE-2015-18).
\9\ In particular, the Exchange proposes to update the following
subparagraphs in Options 3, Section 20: (c)(2), (d)(2), (g), (h),
(i), (l)(1)(A), (l)(1)(B), (l)(1)(C), and (l)(2)(A). The Exchange
also proposes to update Supplementary Material .03 to Options 3,
Section 20.
\10\ See BX, NOM, and Phlx Options 3, Section 20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\11\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest and because it is not designed to permit
[[Page 16541]]
unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further believes that its proposal to amend the
current appeal process to harmonize with Phlx's appeal process is
consistent with the Act because it will continue to afford Members with
due process in connection with decisions made by Officials under
Options 3, Section 20 that the Member may feel warrants review. As
discussed above, the proposal would allow either party until 9:30 a.m.
the next trading to submit a request for review if notification is made
after 3:30 p.m., which the Exchange believes will be helpful for
Members in submitting their appeal requests in a timely manner.
Furthermore, the proposal provides the Exchange Review Council panel
additional time and flexibility to render decisions on requests for
appeal in cases where a request is properly made after 3:30 p.m. on the
day of the transaction or where the request is properly made the next
trade day, and is designed to reduce administrative burden on the
Exchange. As it relates to the Appeal Fee, the Exchange believes that
the proposed reduction of the fee from $5,000 to $500 is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it aligns to the
Appeal Fee assessed by its affiliates \13\ and by other options
exchanges,\14\ and will be applied uniformly to all Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See supra note 5.
\14\ See, e.g., Cboe BZX Exchange Rule 20.6(l)(5) and MIAX
Options Exchange Rule 521(l)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultimately, the proposed changes to the appeal process are intended
to align certain time frames and the Appeal Fee with those of its
affiliates in order to provide more consistent rules and procedures
across the affiliated options exchanges owned by Nasdaq, Inc.
Consistent rules and procedures, in turn, would simplify and streamline
the regulatory requirements and increase the understanding of the
Exchange's operations for Members of the Exchange that are also members
on the Exchange's affiliated options exchanges. Greater harmonization
across the affiliated options exchanges will result in greater
uniformity, rules that are easier to follow and understand, and more
efficient regulatory compliance, thereby contributing to the protection
of investors and the public interest. As such, the proposed rule change
would foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities and would remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system.
Lastly, the Exchange believes that the proposed non-substantive
changes to replace all instances of Market Control with Official, and
to replace opening rotation with Opening Process, will add clarity,
transparency, and consistency to the Exchange's rules. The Exchange
believes that market participants would benefit from the increased
clarity, thereby reducing potential confusion, and ensuring that market
participants and investors can more easily navigate and understand the
Exchange's rules.
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The changes are designed to
provide greater harmonization among similar rules and processes across
the Exchange's affiliated options exchanges, resulting in more
efficient regulatory compliance for common members.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \15\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2022-08 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2022-08. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions.
You should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2022-08
and should be submitted on or before April 13, 2022.
[[Page 16542]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06100 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P