Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Open Outcry Options Transaction Charges, 16529-16533 [2022-06094]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices
would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system.
For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposal is consistent
with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. As it relates
to the proposed changes to the appeal
process under Options 3, Section 20(k),
the changes are designed to provide
greater harmonization among similar
rules and processes across the
Exchange’s affiliated options exchanges,
resulting in more efficient regulatory
compliance for common members. For
these reasons, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change reflects
this competitive environment and does
not impose any undue burden on
intermarket competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 7 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.8
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
7
8
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Mar 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
16529
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
For the Commission, by the Division
of Trading and Markets, pursuant to
delegated authority.9
IV. Solicitation of Comments
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[FR Doc. 2022–06101 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
[Release No. 34–94453; File No. SR–Phlx–
2022–10]
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BX–2022–004 on the subject line.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Open Outcry
Options Transaction Charges
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2022–004. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer
to File Number SR–BX–2022–004 and
should be submitted on or before April
13, 2022.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
March 17, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 10,
2022, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Phlx’s Pricing Schedule at Options 7,
Section 4, ‘‘Multiply Listed Options
Fees (Includes options overlying
equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes which
are Multiply Listed) (Excludes SPY).’’
The Exchange originally filed the
proposed pricing changes on March 1,
2022 (SR–PHLX–2022–09). On March
10, 2022, the Exchange withdrew that
filing and submitted this filing.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/phlx/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
9
1
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
16530
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
1. Purpose
Phlx proposes to amend its Pricing
Schedule within Options 7, Section 4,
‘‘Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes
options overlying equities, ETFs, ETNs
and indexes which are Multiply Listed)
(Excludes SPY).’’ Specifically, Phlx
proposes to increase the Lead Market
Maker 3 and Market Maker 4 Floor 5
Options Transaction Charges 6 in
multiply-listed Penny and non-Penny
3 The term ‘‘Floor Lead Market Maker’’ is a
member who is registered as an options Lead
Market Maker pursuant to Options 2, Section 12(a)
and has a physical presence on the Exchange’s
Trading Floor. See Phlx’s Pricing Schedule at
Options 7, Section 1(c).
4 The term ‘‘Floor Market Maker’’ is a Market
Maker who is neither an SQT or an RSQT. A Floor
Market Maker may provide a quote in open outcry.
See Phlx’s Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section
1(c).
The term ‘‘Streaming Quote Trader’’ or ‘‘SQT’’ is
defined in Options 1, Section 1(b)(54) as a Market
Maker who has received permission from the
Exchange to generate and submit option quotations
electronically in options to which such SQT is
assigned. See Phlx’s Pricing Schedule at Options 7,
Section 1(c). The term ‘‘Remote Streaming Quote
Trader’’ or ‘‘RSQT’’ is defined in Options 1, Section
1(b)(49) as a Market Maker that is a member
affiliated with an RSQTO with no physical trading
floor presence who has received permission from
the Exchange to generate and submit option
quotations electronically in options to which such
RSQT has been assigned. A Remote Streaming
Quote Trader Organization or ‘‘RSQTO,’’ which
may also be referred to as a Remote Market Making
Organization (‘‘RMO’’), is a member organization in
good standing that satisfies the RSQTO readiness
requirements in Options 2, Section 1(a). See Phlx’s
Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
5 The term ‘‘floor transaction’’ is a transaction
that is effected in open outcry on the Exchange’s
Trading Floor. See Phlx’s Pricing Schedule at
Options 7, Section 1(c).
6 Floor transaction fees apply to any ‘‘as of’’ or
‘‘reversal’’ adjustments for manually processed
trades originally submitted electronically or
through FBMS. See Phlx’s Pricing Schedule at
Options 7, Section 4, footnote 8.
The Floor Based Management System or ‘‘FBMS’’
is an order management system and the gateway for
the electronic execution of equity, equity index and
U.S. dollar-settled foreign currency option orders
represented by Floor Brokers on the Exchange’s
Options Floor. Floor Brokers contemporaneously
upon receipt of an order and prior to the
representation of such an order in the trading
crowd, record all options orders represented by
such Floor Broker to FBMS, which creates an
electronic audit trail. The execution of orders to
Phlx’s electronic trading system also occurs via
FBMS. The FBMS application is available on handheld tablets and stationary desktops.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Mar 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
Symbols and pay a Floor Broker 7 a
rebate when these parties are contra
each other in certain open outcry
transactions.
Today, the Exchange assesses Options
Transaction Charges in Multiply Listed
options, including options overlying
equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes and
excluding options in SPY.8 The
Exchange currently assesses the
following Floor Options Transaction
Charges in multiply-listed Penny and
non-Penny Symbols: $0.05 per contract
for a Professional,9 $0.35 per contract
for a Lead Market Maker and Market
Maker, and $0.25 per contract for a
Broker-Dealer 10 and Firm.11
Customers 12 are not assessed an
Options Transaction Charge in multiplylisted Penny or non-Penny Symbols.
The Exchange proposes to increase
the Floor Lead Market Maker and Floor
Market Maker Options Transaction
Charges in Penny and non-Penny
Symbols from $0.35 to $0.50 per
contract and pay a Floor Broker 13 a new
$0.15 per contract rebate when a Floor
Broker executes an order contra a Floor
7 The term ‘‘Floor Broker’’ means an individual
who is registered with the Exchange for the
purpose, while on the Options Floor, of accepting
and handling options orders. See Phlx’s Pricing
Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
8 Transactions in SPY originating on the
Exchange floor will be subject to the Multiply
Listed Options Fees (see Multiply Listed Options
Fees in Options 7, Section 4). However, if one side
of the transaction originates on the Exchange floor
and any other side of the trade was the result of an
electronically submitted order or a quote, then these
fees will apply to the transactions which originated
on the Exchange floor and contracts that are
executed electronically on all sides of the
transaction. The one side of the transaction which
originates on the Exchange floor will count toward
the volume which qualifies a participant for the
Simple Order Rebate for Adding Liquidity for Lead
Market Makers and Market Makers in SPY. See
Options 7, Section 3, Part C.
9 The term ‘‘Professional’’ applies to transactions
for the accounts of Professionals, as defined in
Options 1, Section 1(b)(45) means any person or
entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities,
and (ii) places more than 390 orders in listed
options per day on average during a calendar month
for its own beneficial account(s). See Phlx’s Pricing
Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
10 The term ‘‘Broker-Dealer’’ applies to any
transaction which is not subject to any of the other
transaction fees applicable within a particular
category. See Phlx’s Pricing Schedule at Options 7,
Section 1(c).
11 The term ‘‘Firm’’ applies to any transaction
that is identified by a member or member
organization for clearing in the Firm range at The
Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’). See Phlx’s
Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
12 The term ‘‘Customer’’ applies to any
transaction that is identified by a member or
member organization for clearing in the Customer
range at OCC which is not for the account of a
broker or dealer or for the account of a
‘‘Professional’’ (as that term is defined in Options
1, Section 1(b)(45)). See Phlx’s Pricing Schedule at
Options 7, Section 1(c).
13 Today, Floor Brokers are not assessed any
Options Transaction Charges.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Lead Marker Maker or Floor Market
Maker in open outcry in multiply-listed
Penny or non-Penny Symbols. The
aforementioned pricing will not apply
to singly listed options,14 index
options,15 FLEX Options,16 strategy
transactions,17 and Floor Qualified
Contingent Cross Orders.18
The Exchange believes that assessing
a Floor Lead Market Maker and a Floor
Market Maker an increased fee of $0.15
per contract (increase from $0.35 to
$0.50 per contract) and paying a Floor
Broker a rebate of $0.15 per contract
will incentivize Floor Brokers to attract
a greater number of orders to Phlx’s
Trading Floor and allow Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
to interact with those orders.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,19 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
of the Act,20 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Commission and the courts have
repeatedly expressed their preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, while
adopting a series of steps to improve the
current market model, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues and, also, recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 21
14 Singly Listed Options are subject to pricing
within Options 7, Section 5C.
15 Index Options are subject to pricing within
Options 7, Section 5A, and B. Today, Options
Transaction Charges in non-Penny Options exclude
NDX, NDXP and XND.
16 FLEX Options are subject to pricing within
Options 7, Section 6B.
17 Strategy transactions include dividend, merger,
short stock interest, reversal and conversion, jelly
roll and box spread strategies as described within
Options 7, Section 4.
18 Floor Qualified Contingent Cross (‘‘QCC’’)
Orders, as described within Options 8, Section
30(e), are subject to pricing noted within Options
7, Section 4. Floor QCC Orders do not qualify as
floor transactions as they are not executed in open
outcry.
19 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
20 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
21 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’).
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities
and Exchange Commission 22
(‘‘NetCoalition’’) the D.C. Circuit upheld
the Commission’s use of a market-based
approach in evaluating the fairness of
market data fees against a challenge
claiming that Congress mandated a costbased approach.23 As the court
emphasized, the Commission ‘‘intended
in Regulation NMS that ‘market forces,
rather than regulatory requirements’
play a role in determining the market
data . . . to be made available to
investors and at what cost.’’ 24
Further, ‘‘[n]o one disputes that
competition for order flow is ‘fierce.’
. . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n the U.S.
national market system, buyers and
sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’ 25 Although the court and
the SEC were discussing the cash
equities markets, the Exchange believes
that these views apply with equal force
to the options markets.
The Exchange’s proposal to increase
the Floor Lead Market Maker and the
Floor Market Maker Options
Transaction Charges in multiply-listed
Penny and non-Penny Symbols from
$0.35 to $0.50 per contract and pay a
Floor Broker a new $0.15 per contract
rebate when a Floor Broker executes an
order contra a Floor Lead Marker Maker
or a Floor Market Maker in open outcry
in multiply-listed Penny or non-Penny
Symbols is reasonable. The Exchange
desires to offer a $0.15 per contract
rebate to the executing Floor Broker to
attract additional order flow to the Phlx
Trading Floor. A similar flat rebate is
offered to Floor Brokers on BOX
Exchange LLC (‘‘BOX’’).26 The proposed
22 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir.
2010).
23 See NetCoalition, at 534–535.
24 Id. at 537.
25 Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR
74770, 74782–83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–
NYSEArca-2006–21)).
26 Today, BOX pays Floor Brokers a $0.075 per
contract rebate for all Broker Dealer and Market
Maker QOO Orders presented on the Trading Floor
and a $0.05 per contract rebate for all Professional
Customer QOO Orders presented on the Trading
Floor. Unlike BOX who pays a $0.05 per contract
rebate for both sides of the QOO Order, the
Exchange would pay a Floor Broker a rebate of
$0.15 per contract for orders in open outcry contra
Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
in multiply-listed Penny and non-Penny Symbols.
See BOX’s Fee Schedule at Section III. BOX’s rebate
does not apply to Public Customer executions,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Mar 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
rebate would be directed to the Floor
Broker and not to the Floor Lead Market
Maker or the Floor Market Maker who
is assessed an Options Transaction
Charge. In other words, the rebate is
paid to the Floor Broker who executed
the order in open outcry contra the
Floor Lead Market Maker or the Floor
Market Maker. The rebate would be paid
from revenues obtained by assessing
Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor
Market Makers the proposed $0.50 per
contract Options Transaction Charge
instead of the current $0.35 per contract
Options Transaction Charge.27 The
Exchange believes it is reasonable to
only apply the rebate to Floor Brokers
and not to Floor Lead Market Makers
and Floor Market Makers. Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
only represent their own interest on the
Trading Floor and therefore do not need
a similar incentive. Unlike Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers, Floor Brokers act as agents in
representing orders on the Exchange’s
Trading Floor. Participants who desire
to have an order executed on Phlx’s
Trading Floor would provide that order
to a Floor Broker to be represented on
the Trading Floor. Floor Lead Market
Makers and Floor Market Makers may
interact with orders represented by the
Floor Broker in open outcry on the
Trading Floor. Finally, Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
may choose to conduct their business on
a Trading Floor or in an electronic
market, unlike Floor Brokers, who have
a business model that is naturally tied
to the physical trading space. While this
proposal increases the Floor Options
Transaction Charges for Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
in open outcry in multiply-listed Penny
or non-Penny Symbols when a Floor
Broker executes an order contra a Floor
Lead Market Maker or a Floor Market
Maker, the Exchange believes that the
ability to attract a greater amount of
order flow on the Exchange’s Trading
Floor will allow Floor Lead Market
Makers and Floor Market Makers to
participate in a greater number of open
outcry transactions.
Today, market participants may send
order flow to the Trading Floor by either
investing in technology, systems and
personnel to participate on the Trading
Floor, or utilizing the services of a Floor
Broker. Offering the proposed rebate to
executions subject to the Strategy QOO Order Fee
Cap, or Broker Dealer executions where the Broker
Dealer is facilitating a Public Customer. See BOX’s
Fee Schedule at Section II.
27 BOX assesses its Market Makers a manual
transaction fee of $0.35 per contract in Penny and
Non-Penny Interval Classes. See BOX’s Fee
Schedule at Section II.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16531
Floor Brokers will allow Floor Brokers
to price their services at a level that
would enable them to attract additional
order flow to the Exchange. To the
extent Floor Brokers are able to attract
additional orders; they will gain
important information that would allow
them to solicit future orders for
participation in other trades. This will
in turn, benefit other Exchange
participants through additional liquidity
on the Trading Floor with which they
may interact. Finally, the Exchange
believes that the rebate will promote
competition by allowing Floor Brokers
to competitively price their services and
for the Exchange to remain competitive
with other exchanges.
The Exchange’s proposal to increase
the Floor Lead Market Maker and the
Floor Market Maker Options
Transaction Charges in multiply-listed
Penny and non-Penny Symbols from
$0.35 to $0.50 per contract and pay a
Floor Broker a new $0.15 per contract
rebate when a Floor Broker executes an
order contra a Floor Lead Marker Maker
or a Floor Market Maker in open outcry
in multiply-listed Penny or non-Penny
Symbols is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory. The Exchange believes
it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to only apply the rebate
to Floor Brokers and not to Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers. Floor Lead Market Makers and
Floor Market Makers only represent
their own interest on the Trading Floor
and therefore do not need a similar
incentive. Unlike Floor Lead Market
Makers and Floor Market Makers, Floor
Brokers act as agents in representing
orders on the Exchange’s Trading Floor.
They serve a valuable function in open
outcry in allowing market participants
to have their orders represented in this
venue without the need to be a member
of the Exchange.28 Further, Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
benefit from having access to interact
with orders that are made available in
open outcry on the Trading Floor. Floor
Lead Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers may choose to conduct their
business on a Trading Floor or in an
electronic market, unlike Floor Brokers,
who have a business model that is
naturally tied to the physical trading
space. The Exchange believes that it is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to assess Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
a higher Options Transaction Charge
because they have the benefit of trading
28 Participants who desire to have an order
executed on Phlx’s Trading Floor would provide
that order to a Floor Broker to be represented on
the Trading Floor.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
16532
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices
on the Trading Floor or in an electronic
venue if they so choose. The proposed
$0.50 Options Transaction Charge for
Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor
Market Makers and the $0.15 per
contract rebate for Floor Brokers will be
uniformly assessed and paid,
respectively, to all Floor Lead Market
Makers, Floor Market Makers, and Floor
Brokers participating in open outcry
trades in multiply-listed Penny and
non-Penny symbols.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to not pay a rebate when an
order is executed electronically or for
orders that are singly listed options,
index options, FLEX Options, strategy
transactions, and Floor QCC Orders is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory as pricing for these types
of transactions are specified separately
from Floor Options Transaction Charges
within Options 7, Section 4 of the
Pricing Schedule.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
Inter-Market Competition
The proposal does not impose an
undue burden on inter-market
competition. The Exchange believes its
proposal remains competitive with
other options markets and will offer
market participants with another choice
of where to transact options. The
Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges that have been exempted
from compliance with the statutory
standards applicable to exchanges.
Because competitors are free to modify
their own fees in response, and because
market participants may readily adjust
their order routing practices, the
Exchange believes that the degree to
which fee changes in this market may
impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
Moreover, the proposal is designed to
encourage Floor Brokers to attract a
greater amount of order flow to Phlx’s
Trading Floor. To the extent that the
proposed change attracts additional
order flow to Phlx’s Trading Floor, this
increased order flow would continue to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Mar 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
make the Exchange a more competitive
venue for order execution.
Intra-Market Competition
The proposed amendments do not
impose an undue burden on intramarket competition.
The Exchange’s proposal to increase
the Floor Lead Market Maker and the
Floor Market Maker Options
Transaction Charges in multiply-listed
Penny and non-Penny Symbols from
$0.35 to $0.50 per contract and pay a
Floor Broker a new $0.15 per contract
rebate when a Floor Broker executes an
order contra a Floor Lead Marker Maker
or a Floor Market Maker in open outcry
in multiply-listed Penny or non-Penny
Symbols does not impose an undue
burden on competition. Only applying a
rebate to Floor Brokers and not to Floor
Lead Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers does not impose an undue
burden on competition because Floor
Lead Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers only represent their own interest
on the Trading Floor and therefore do
not need a similar incentive. Unlike
Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor
Market Makers, Floor Brokers act as
agents in representing orders on the
Exchange’s Trading Floor. They serve a
valuable function in open outcry in
allowing market participants to have
their orders represented in this venue
without the need to be a member of the
Exchange. Further, Floor Lead Market
Makers and Floor Market Makers benefit
from having access to interact with
orders that are made available in open
outcry on the Trading Floor. Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
may choose to conduct their business on
the Trading Floor or in an electronic
market, unlike Floor Brokers, who have
a business model that is naturally tied
to the physical trading space. The
Exchange believes that assessing Floor
Lead Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers a higher Options Transaction
Charge does not impose an undue
burden on competition because they
have the benefit of trading on a Trading
Floor or in an electronic venue if they
so choose. The proposed $0.50 Options
Transaction Charge for Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
and the $0.15 per contract rebate for
Floor Brokers will be uniformly
assessed and paid, respectively, to all
Floor Lead Market Makers, Floor Market
Makers, and Floor Brokers participating
in open outcry trades in multiply-listed
Penny and non-Penny symbols.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to not pay a rebate when an
order is executed electronically or for
orders that are singly listed options,
index options, FLEX Options, strategy
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
transactions, and Floor QCC Orders
does not impose an undue burden on
competition as pricing for these types of
transactions are specified separately
from Floor Options Transaction Charges
within Options 7, Section 4 of the
Pricing Schedule.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.29
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2022–10 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2022–10. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
29
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2022–10 and should
be submitted on or before April 13,
2022.
For the Commission, by the Division
of Trading and Markets, pursuant to
delegated authority.30
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2022–06094 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–94443; File No. SR–MRX–
2022–03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Harmonize Various
Processes Under Options 3, Section 20
Across the Affiliated Nasdaq Options
Exchanges
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
March 17, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 8,
2022, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
30
1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Mar 22, 2022
Jkt 256001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to harmonize
various processes under Options 3,
Section 20 across the affiliated Nasdaq
options exchanges.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/mrx/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to harmonize
its existing processes with those of its
affiliate Nasdaq Phlx LLC (‘‘Phlx’’)
concerning the review of decisions on
appeal under Options 3, Section 20. The
Exchange also proposes a number of
non-substantive changes. Each change is
discussed in detail below.
Appeal
Today, Options 3, Section 20(k)
governs the appeal process for
determinations by Exchange staff made
under this Rule, including obvious error
determinations. Specifically, if a
Member affected by a determination
under this Rule so requests within the
permitted time period, an Exchange
Review Council panel will review
decisions made by the Official under
Options 3, Section 20, including
whether an obvious error occurred and
whether the correct determination was
made. A request for review on appeal
must be made in writing via email or
other electronic means specified from
time to time by the Exchange in an
Options Trader Alert distributed to
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16533
Members within thirty (30) minutes
after the party making the appeal is
given notification of the initial
determination being appealed. The
Exchange Review Council panel shall
review the facts and render a decision
as soon as practicable, but generally on
the same trading day as the execution(s)
under review. On requests for appeal
received after 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time, a
decision will be rendered as soon as
practicable, but in no case later than the
trading day following the date of the
execution under review. Furthermore, if
the Exchange Review Council panel
votes to uphold the decision made
under this Rule, the Exchange will
assess a fee (‘‘Appeal Fee’’) of $5,000
against the Member(s) who initiated the
request for appeal.
The Exchange proposes generally to
maintain its current appeal process with
certain adjustments to harmonize its
process with that of its affiliate, Phlx.
First, while Phlx similarly requires the
parties to submit a request for review
within thirty (30) minutes of being
notified of the determination being
appealed, Phlx also provides parties
with additional time to submit their
request if the notification occurs later in
the trading day. In particular, if the
notification is made after 3:30 p.m.
Eastern Time, either party has until 9:30
a.m. Eastern Time on the next trading
day to submit a request for review.3
Similar to Phlx, the Exchange believes
that this flexibility will be helpful for
Members in submitting their appeal
requests in a timely manner,
particularly where notification of the
Official’s decision was received later in
the trading day, and therefore proposes
to adopt this provision in Options 3,
Section 20(k)(2).
Second, the Exchange proposes to
amend its provisions for when the
Exchange Review Council panel must
render a decision on requests for appeal
by harmonizing to Phlx’s process.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes in
Options 3, Section 20(k)(2) that the
Exchange Review Council panel shall
review the facts and render a decision
on the day of the transaction, or the next
trade day in the case where a request is
properly made after 3:30 p.m. on the
day of the transaction or where the
request is properly made the next trade
day.4 The proposed language modifies
the current process by extending the
current cutoff time from 3:00 to 3:30
p.m. Eastern Time for the Exchange
Review Council panel to render a
decision on the next trading day, and by
See Phlx Options 3, Section 20(l).
See Phlx Options 3, Section 20(l) for analogous
language.
3
4
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16529-16533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06094]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-94453; File No. SR-Phlx-2022-10]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Open
Outcry Options Transaction Charges
March 17, 2022.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 10, 2022, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 4, ``Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes options
overlying equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed)
(Excludes SPY).''
The Exchange originally filed the proposed pricing changes on March
1, 2022 (SR-PHLX-2022-09). On March 10, 2022, the Exchange withdrew
that filing and submitted this filing.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed
[[Page 16530]]
any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Phlx proposes to amend its Pricing Schedule within Options 7,
Section 4, ``Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes options overlying
equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed) (Excludes
SPY).'' Specifically, Phlx proposes to increase the Lead Market Maker
\3\ and Market Maker \4\ Floor \5\ Options Transaction Charges \6\ in
multiply-listed Penny and non-Penny Symbols and pay a Floor Broker \7\
a rebate when these parties are contra each other in certain open
outcry transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The term ``Floor Lead Market Maker'' is a member who is
registered as an options Lead Market Maker pursuant to Options 2,
Section 12(a) and has a physical presence on the Exchange's Trading
Floor. See Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
\4\ The term ``Floor Market Maker'' is a Market Maker who is
neither an SQT or an RSQT. A Floor Market Maker may provide a quote
in open outcry. See Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section
1(c).
The term ``Streaming Quote Trader'' or ``SQT'' is defined in
Options 1, Section 1(b)(54) as a Market Maker who has received
permission from the Exchange to generate and submit option
quotations electronically in options to which such SQT is assigned.
See Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c). The term
``Remote Streaming Quote Trader'' or ``RSQT'' is defined in Options
1, Section 1(b)(49) as a Market Maker that is a member affiliated
with an RSQTO with no physical trading floor presence who has
received permission from the Exchange to generate and submit option
quotations electronically in options to which such RSQT has been
assigned. A Remote Streaming Quote Trader Organization or ``RSQTO,''
which may also be referred to as a Remote Market Making Organization
(``RMO''), is a member organization in good standing that satisfies
the RSQTO readiness requirements in Options 2, Section 1(a). See
Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
\5\ The term ``floor transaction'' is a transaction that is
effected in open outcry on the Exchange's Trading Floor. See Phlx's
Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
\6\ Floor transaction fees apply to any ``as of'' or
``reversal'' adjustments for manually processed trades originally
submitted electronically or through FBMS. See Phlx's Pricing
Schedule at Options 7, Section 4, footnote 8.
The Floor Based Management System or ``FBMS'' is an order
management system and the gateway for the electronic execution of
equity, equity index and U.S. dollar-settled foreign currency option
orders represented by Floor Brokers on the Exchange's Options Floor.
Floor Brokers contemporaneously upon receipt of an order and prior
to the representation of such an order in the trading crowd, record
all options orders represented by such Floor Broker to FBMS, which
creates an electronic audit trail. The execution of orders to Phlx's
electronic trading system also occurs via FBMS. The FBMS application
is available on hand-held tablets and stationary desktops.
\7\ The term ``Floor Broker'' means an individual who is
registered with the Exchange for the purpose, while on the Options
Floor, of accepting and handling options orders. See Phlx's Pricing
Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, the Exchange assesses Options Transaction Charges in
Multiply Listed options, including options overlying equities, ETFs,
ETNs and indexes and excluding options in SPY.\8\ The Exchange
currently assesses the following Floor Options Transaction Charges in
multiply-listed Penny and non-Penny Symbols: $0.05 per contract for a
Professional,\9\ $0.35 per contract for a Lead Market Maker and Market
Maker, and $0.25 per contract for a Broker-Dealer \10\ and Firm.\11\
Customers \12\ are not assessed an Options Transaction Charge in
multiply-listed Penny or non-Penny Symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Transactions in SPY originating on the Exchange floor will
be subject to the Multiply Listed Options Fees (see Multiply Listed
Options Fees in Options 7, Section 4). However, if one side of the
transaction originates on the Exchange floor and any other side of
the trade was the result of an electronically submitted order or a
quote, then these fees will apply to the transactions which
originated on the Exchange floor and contracts that are executed
electronically on all sides of the transaction. The one side of the
transaction which originates on the Exchange floor will count toward
the volume which qualifies a participant for the Simple Order Rebate
for Adding Liquidity for Lead Market Makers and Market Makers in
SPY. See Options 7, Section 3, Part C.
\9\ The term ``Professional'' applies to transactions for the
accounts of Professionals, as defined in Options 1, Section 1(b)(45)
means any person or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in
securities, and (ii) places more than 390 orders in listed options
per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s). See Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
\10\ The term ``Broker-Dealer'' applies to any transaction which
is not subject to any of the other transaction fees applicable
within a particular category. See Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 1(c).
\11\ The term ``Firm'' applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member organization for clearing in the
Firm range at The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC''). See Phlx's
Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 1(c).
\12\ The term ``Customer'' applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member organization for clearing in the
Customer range at OCC which is not for the account of a broker or
dealer or for the account of a ``Professional'' (as that term is
defined in Options 1, Section 1(b)(45)). See Phlx's Pricing Schedule
at Options 7, Section 1(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to increase the Floor Lead Market Maker and
Floor Market Maker Options Transaction Charges in Penny and non-Penny
Symbols from $0.35 to $0.50 per contract and pay a Floor Broker \13\ a
new $0.15 per contract rebate when a Floor Broker executes an order
contra a Floor Lead Marker Maker or Floor Market Maker in open outcry
in multiply-listed Penny or non-Penny Symbols. The aforementioned
pricing will not apply to singly listed options,\14\ index options,\15\
FLEX Options,\16\ strategy transactions,\17\ and Floor Qualified
Contingent Cross Orders.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Today, Floor Brokers are not assessed any Options
Transaction Charges.
\14\ Singly Listed Options are subject to pricing within Options
7, Section 5C.
\15\ Index Options are subject to pricing within Options 7,
Section 5A, and B. Today, Options Transaction Charges in non-Penny
Options exclude NDX, NDXP and XND.
\16\ FLEX Options are subject to pricing within Options 7,
Section 6B.
\17\ Strategy transactions include dividend, merger, short stock
interest, reversal and conversion, jelly roll and box spread
strategies as described within Options 7, Section 4.
\18\ Floor Qualified Contingent Cross (``QCC'') Orders, as
described within Options 8, Section 30(e), are subject to pricing
noted within Options 7, Section 4. Floor QCC Orders do not qualify
as floor transactions as they are not executed in open outcry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that assessing a Floor Lead Market Maker and
a Floor Market Maker an increased fee of $0.15 per contract (increase
from $0.35 to $0.50 per contract) and paying a Floor Broker a rebate of
$0.15 per contract will incentivize Floor Brokers to attract a greater
number of orders to Phlx's Trading Floor and allow Floor Lead Market
Makers and Floor Market Makers to interact with those orders.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\19\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\20\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005),
70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 16531]]
Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission
\22\ (``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of
a market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees
against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based
approach.\23\ As the court emphasized, the Commission ``intended in
Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory
requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be
made available to investors and at what cost.'' \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
\23\ See NetCoalition, at 534-535.
\24\ Id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .'' \25\ Although the court and
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to increase the Floor Lead Market Maker and
the Floor Market Maker Options Transaction Charges in multiply-listed
Penny and non-Penny Symbols from $0.35 to $0.50 per contract and pay a
Floor Broker a new $0.15 per contract rebate when a Floor Broker
executes an order contra a Floor Lead Marker Maker or a Floor Market
Maker in open outcry in multiply-listed Penny or non-Penny Symbols is
reasonable. The Exchange desires to offer a $0.15 per contract rebate
to the executing Floor Broker to attract additional order flow to the
Phlx Trading Floor. A similar flat rebate is offered to Floor Brokers
on BOX Exchange LLC (``BOX'').\26\ The proposed rebate would be
directed to the Floor Broker and not to the Floor Lead Market Maker or
the Floor Market Maker who is assessed an Options Transaction Charge.
In other words, the rebate is paid to the Floor Broker who executed the
order in open outcry contra the Floor Lead Market Maker or the Floor
Market Maker. The rebate would be paid from revenues obtained by
assessing Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers the proposed
$0.50 per contract Options Transaction Charge instead of the current
$0.35 per contract Options Transaction Charge.\27\ The Exchange
believes it is reasonable to only apply the rebate to Floor Brokers and
not to Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers. Floor Lead
Market Makers and Floor Market Makers only represent their own interest
on the Trading Floor and therefore do not need a similar incentive.
Unlike Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers, Floor Brokers
act as agents in representing orders on the Exchange's Trading Floor.
Participants who desire to have an order executed on Phlx's Trading
Floor would provide that order to a Floor Broker to be represented on
the Trading Floor. Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers may
interact with orders represented by the Floor Broker in open outcry on
the Trading Floor. Finally, Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers may choose to conduct their business on a Trading Floor or in an
electronic market, unlike Floor Brokers, who have a business model that
is naturally tied to the physical trading space. While this proposal
increases the Floor Options Transaction Charges for Floor Lead Market
Makers and Floor Market Makers in open outcry in multiply-listed Penny
or non-Penny Symbols when a Floor Broker executes an order contra a
Floor Lead Market Maker or a Floor Market Maker, the Exchange believes
that the ability to attract a greater amount of order flow on the
Exchange's Trading Floor will allow Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor
Market Makers to participate in a greater number of open outcry
transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Today, BOX pays Floor Brokers a $0.075 per contract rebate
for all Broker Dealer and Market Maker QOO Orders presented on the
Trading Floor and a $0.05 per contract rebate for all Professional
Customer QOO Orders presented on the Trading Floor. Unlike BOX who
pays a $0.05 per contract rebate for both sides of the QOO Order,
the Exchange would pay a Floor Broker a rebate of $0.15 per contract
for orders in open outcry contra Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor
Market Makers in multiply-listed Penny and non-Penny Symbols. See
BOX's Fee Schedule at Section III. BOX's rebate does not apply to
Public Customer executions, executions subject to the Strategy QOO
Order Fee Cap, or Broker Dealer executions where the Broker Dealer
is facilitating a Public Customer. See BOX's Fee Schedule at Section
II.
\27\ BOX assesses its Market Makers a manual transaction fee of
$0.35 per contract in Penny and Non-Penny Interval Classes. See
BOX's Fee Schedule at Section II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, market participants may send order flow to the Trading Floor
by either investing in technology, systems and personnel to participate
on the Trading Floor, or utilizing the services of a Floor Broker.
Offering the proposed rebate to Floor Brokers will allow Floor Brokers
to price their services at a level that would enable them to attract
additional order flow to the Exchange. To the extent Floor Brokers are
able to attract additional orders; they will gain important information
that would allow them to solicit future orders for participation in
other trades. This will in turn, benefit other Exchange participants
through additional liquidity on the Trading Floor with which they may
interact. Finally, the Exchange believes that the rebate will promote
competition by allowing Floor Brokers to competitively price their
services and for the Exchange to remain competitive with other
exchanges.
The Exchange's proposal to increase the Floor Lead Market Maker and
the Floor Market Maker Options Transaction Charges in multiply-listed
Penny and non-Penny Symbols from $0.35 to $0.50 per contract and pay a
Floor Broker a new $0.15 per contract rebate when a Floor Broker
executes an order contra a Floor Lead Marker Maker or a Floor Market
Maker in open outcry in multiply-listed Penny or non-Penny Symbols is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. The Exchange believes it is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to only apply the rebate to
Floor Brokers and not to Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers. Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers only represent
their own interest on the Trading Floor and therefore do not need a
similar incentive. Unlike Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers, Floor Brokers act as agents in representing orders on the
Exchange's Trading Floor. They serve a valuable function in open outcry
in allowing market participants to have their orders represented in
this venue without the need to be a member of the Exchange.\28\
Further, Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers benefit from
having access to interact with orders that are made available in open
outcry on the Trading Floor. Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers may choose to conduct their business on a Trading Floor or in an
electronic market, unlike Floor Brokers, who have a business model that
is naturally tied to the physical trading space. The Exchange believes
that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to assess Floor
Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers a higher Options Transaction
Charge because they have the benefit of trading
[[Page 16532]]
on the Trading Floor or in an electronic venue if they so choose. The
proposed $0.50 Options Transaction Charge for Floor Lead Market Makers
and Floor Market Makers and the $0.15 per contract rebate for Floor
Brokers will be uniformly assessed and paid, respectively, to all Floor
Lead Market Makers, Floor Market Makers, and Floor Brokers
participating in open outcry trades in multiply-listed Penny and non-
Penny symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ Participants who desire to have an order executed on Phlx's
Trading Floor would provide that order to a Floor Broker to be
represented on the Trading Floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal to not pay a rebate when an
order is executed electronically or for orders that are singly listed
options, index options, FLEX Options, strategy transactions, and Floor
QCC Orders is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as
pricing for these types of transactions are specified separately from
Floor Options Transaction Charges within Options 7, Section 4 of the
Pricing Schedule.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Inter-Market Competition
The proposal does not impose an undue burden on inter-market
competition. The Exchange believes its proposal remains competitive
with other options markets and will offer market participants with
another choice of where to transact options. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges that have been exempted from compliance with the statutory
standards applicable to exchanges. Because competitors are free to
modify their own fees in response, and because market participants may
readily adjust their order routing practices, the Exchange believes
that the degree to which fee changes in this market may impose any
burden on competition is extremely limited.
Moreover, the proposal is designed to encourage Floor Brokers to
attract a greater amount of order flow to Phlx's Trading Floor. To the
extent that the proposed change attracts additional order flow to
Phlx's Trading Floor, this increased order flow would continue to make
the Exchange a more competitive venue for order execution.
Intra-Market Competition
The proposed amendments do not impose an undue burden on intra-
market competition.
The Exchange's proposal to increase the Floor Lead Market Maker and
the Floor Market Maker Options Transaction Charges in multiply-listed
Penny and non-Penny Symbols from $0.35 to $0.50 per contract and pay a
Floor Broker a new $0.15 per contract rebate when a Floor Broker
executes an order contra a Floor Lead Marker Maker or a Floor Market
Maker in open outcry in multiply-listed Penny or non-Penny Symbols does
not impose an undue burden on competition. Only applying a rebate to
Floor Brokers and not to Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market
Makers does not impose an undue burden on competition because Floor
Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers only represent their own
interest on the Trading Floor and therefore do not need a similar
incentive. Unlike Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers,
Floor Brokers act as agents in representing orders on the Exchange's
Trading Floor. They serve a valuable function in open outcry in
allowing market participants to have their orders represented in this
venue without the need to be a member of the Exchange. Further, Floor
Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers benefit from having access
to interact with orders that are made available in open outcry on the
Trading Floor. Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers may
choose to conduct their business on the Trading Floor or in an
electronic market, unlike Floor Brokers, who have a business model that
is naturally tied to the physical trading space. The Exchange believes
that assessing Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers a
higher Options Transaction Charge does not impose an undue burden on
competition because they have the benefit of trading on a Trading Floor
or in an electronic venue if they so choose. The proposed $0.50 Options
Transaction Charge for Floor Lead Market Makers and Floor Market Makers
and the $0.15 per contract rebate for Floor Brokers will be uniformly
assessed and paid, respectively, to all Floor Lead Market Makers, Floor
Market Makers, and Floor Brokers participating in open outcry trades in
multiply-listed Penny and non-Penny symbols.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to not pay a rebate when an
order is executed electronically or for orders that are singly listed
options, index options, FLEX Options, strategy transactions, and Floor
QCC Orders does not impose an undue burden on competition as pricing
for these types of transactions are specified separately from Floor
Options Transaction Charges within Options 7, Section 4 of the Pricing
Schedule.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2022-10 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2022-10. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the
[[Page 16533]]
submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with
respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission,
and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2022-10 and should be submitted on
or before April 13, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06094 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P