Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 26th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 16455-16457 [2022-06076]

Download as PDF jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices standards under an existing organic equivalency or recognition agreement. Certified organic soybean meal subject to this investigation has a protein content of 34 percent or higher. Organic soybean meal that is otherwise subject to this investigation is included when incorporated in admixtures, including but not limited to prepared animal feeds. Only the organic soybean meal component of such admixture is covered by the scope of this investigation. The products covered by this investigation are currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 1208.10.0010 and 2304.00.0000. Certified organic soybean meal may also enter under HTSUS 2309.90.1005, 2309.90.1015, 2309.90.1020, 2309.90.1030, 2309.90.1032, 2309.90.1035, 2309.90.1045, 2309.90.1050, and 2308.00.9890. The HTSUS subheadings and specifications are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope is dispositive. the Merchandise Export Incentive Scheme (MEIS) Program Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Countervail the Pre-Shipment and PostShipment Export Financing Program Comment 10: Whether Commerce Assigned the AFA Rate Twice for the SGMP Exemption from Electricity Duty and Cess on Electricity Supplied to a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Unit Program Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Countervail the Advance Authorization Program (AAP) and the Duty Drawback (DDB) Program Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to the Non-Cooperative Mandatory Respondents that Withdrew from Participation in the Investigation Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to the Government of India (GOI) Comment 14: Whether Commerce Correctly Initiated the Transportation and Marketing Assistance (TMA) for Special Agriculture Products VIII. Recommendation Appendix II [FR Doc. 2022–06155 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] List of Topics Discussed in the Decision Memorandum: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Investigation IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences: Non-Cooperative and Non-Responsive Companies V. Subsidies Valuation VI. Analysis of Programs VII. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether Bergwerff Failed to Identify an Affiliated Supplier Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Bergwerff for Failing to Report Use of an Export Promotion Scheme Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Countervail the Duty Drawback Benefits Received by Bergwerff for Organic Soybeans Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Have Selected Additional Respondents for Individual Examination in this Investigation Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total AFA to Shanti Overseas (India) Ltd. Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Recalculate the Benefits Received Under the Duty-Free Importation of Capital Goods and Raw Materials, Components, Consumables, Intermediates, Spare Parts and Packing Material, and Exemption from Central Sales Tax (CST) on Purchases of Capital Goods and Raw Materials, Components, Consumables, Intermediates, Spare Parts, and Packing Material Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Countervail the Exemption from Payment of Central Sales Tax (CST) on Purchases of Capital Goods and Raw Materials, Components, Consumables, Intermediates, Spare Parts and Packing Materials Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Recalculate the Benefits Received Under BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:07 Mar 22, 2022 Jkt 256001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration U.S. Section Membership Opportunities for the United StatesIndia CEO Forum International Trade Administration (ITA), Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce, ITA, is amending the Notice published at 87 FR 9318 (February 18, 2022), regarding the dates for submission of applications for appointment, or reappointment, to the U.S. Section of the U.S.-India CEO Forum. ITA will accept applications on a rolling basis for membership on the U.S. Section of the Forum for terms that will begin upon appointment and will expire on December 31, 2024. Immediate consideration will now be given to applications received by April 6, 2022. ITA will accept nominations under this notice on an on-going basis during the charter term to fill vacancies as they arise. ADDRESSES: For inquiries and an application, please contact Noor Sclafani, International Trade Specialist, Office of South Asia, U.S. Department of Commerce, by email at noor.sclafani@ trade.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Noor Sclafani, International Trade Specialist, Office of South Asia, U.S. Department of Commerce, telephone: (202) 823–1840. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16455 Please refer to Notice published at 87 FR 9318 (February 18, 2022). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: March 18, 2022. Jed Diemond, Deputy Director, Office of South Asia. [FR Doc. 2022–06164 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–HE–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–831] Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 26th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of China (China) for the period of review (POR) November 1, 2019, through October 31, 2020. We determine that mandatory respondent, Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Shunchang) failed to establish its eligibility for a separate rate and, therefore, is part of the China-wide entity. We are rescinding the review with respect to Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. (Harmoni). DATES: Applicable March 23, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacob Saude, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0981. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On November 30, 2021, Commerce published the preliminary results of the twenty-sixth administrative review of fresh garlic from China.1 No interested party submitted comments concerning the Preliminary Results or requested that a hearing be held. Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 1 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 26th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 2020, 86 FR 67911 (November 30, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM 23MRN1 16456 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices The current deadline for the final results is March 30, 2022. jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 Scope of the Order The products subject to the order are all grades of garlic, whole or separated into constituent cloves, whether or not peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, provisionally preserved, or packed in water or other neutral substance, but not prepared or preserved by the addition of other ingredients or heat processing. The differences between grades are based on color, size, sheathing, and level of decay. The scope of the order does not include the following: (a) Garlic that has been mechanically harvested and that is primarily, but not exclusively, destined for non-fresh use; or (b) garlic that has been specially prepared and cultivated prior to planting and then harvested and otherwise prepared for use as seed. The subject merchandise is used principally as a food product and for seasoning. The subject garlic is currently classifiable under subheadings: 0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0005, 0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0015, 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, and 2005.99.9700, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. In order to be excluded from the order, garlic entered under the HTSUS subheadings listed above that is: (1) Mechanically harvested and primarily, but not exclusively, destined for nonfresh use; or (2) specially prepared and cultivated prior to planting and then harvested and otherwise prepared for use as seed must be accompanied by declarations to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to that effect. Final Partial Rescission of Administrative Review In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that the review request from Roots Farm for Harmoni was invalid ab initio, and it preliminarily rescinded the administrative review with respect to Harmoni. Because Commerce did not receive any comments on its preliminary finding, Commerce continues to find that the review request from Roots Farm was invalid ab initio, and Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to Harmoni. China-Wide Entity Commerce’s policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:07 Mar 22, 2022 Jkt 256001 entity applies to this administrative review.2 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity in this review, and Commerce did not selfinitiate a review, the entity is not under review and the entity’s rate (i.e., $4.71/ kg) is not subject to change. Aside from the companies for which the review has been or is being rescinded, Commerce considers all other companies for which a review was requested, and which did not preliminarily qualify for a separate rate, to be part of the China-wide entity. Final Results of Administrative Review Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping margin exists for the administrative review covering the period November 1, 2019, through October 31, 2020: Weightedaverage margin (dollars per kilogram) Exporter China-Wide Entity 3 ..................... 4.71 Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Commerce intends to direct CBP to assess rates based on the per-unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on each entry of the subject merchandise during the POR. Commerce also intends to issue assessment instructions no earlier than 35 days after the publication date of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 2 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 3 The companies that are part of the China-wide entity in this review are Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd. and Jining Shunchang Food Co., Ltd. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice in the Federal Register, as provided by sections 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) For the companies identified in the chart above, the cash deposit rate will be the Chinawide rate; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed above that have received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the China-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars per kilogram; and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notifications Regarding Administrative Protection Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance with sections E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM 23MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2022 / Notices 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: March 14, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2022–06076 Filed 3–22–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–791–806] Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From South Africa: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on stainless steel plate in coils (SSPC) from South Africa would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Applicable March 23, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 On May 11, 1999, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of the CVD order on SSPC from South Africa.1 On December 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the fourth sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On December 15, 2021, Commerce received notices of intent to participate from ATI Flat Rolled Products Holdings, LLC (ATI) and Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC (Outokumpu) (collectively, the domestic interested parties) within the deadline 1 See Notice of Amended Final Determinations: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium and South Africa; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium, Italy and South Africa, 64 FR 25288 (May 11, 1999) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 68220 (December 1, 2021). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:07 Mar 22, 2022 Jkt 256001 specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status within the meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(v) as domestic producers of SSPC in the United States. On January 3, 2022, Commerce received an adequate substantive response from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from either the Government of South Africa or a respondent interested party to this proceeding. On January 20, 2022, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.5 As a result, Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the Order is certain stainless steel plate in coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, with or without other elements. The subject plate products are flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in width and 4.75 mm or more in thickness, in coils, and annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise descaled. The subject plate may also be further processed (e.g., cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that it maintains the specified dimensions of plate following such processing. Excluded from the scope of the Order are the following: (1) Plate not in coils, (2) plate that is not annealed or otherwise heat treated and pickled or otherwise descaled, (3) sheet and strip, and (4) flat bars. The merchandise subject to the Order is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheadings: 3 See ATI’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South Africa—Domestic Interested Party’s Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated December 15, 2021; see also Outokumpu’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South Africa—Outokumpu’s Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated December 15, 2021. 4 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘FiveYear (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South Africa—Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated January 3, 2022. 5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated On December 1, 2021,’’ dated January 20, 2022. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16457 7219.11.00.30, 7219.11.00.60, 7219.12.00.06, 7219.12.00.21, 7219.12.00.26, 7219.12.00.51, 7219.12.00.56, 7219.12.00.66, 7219.12.00.71, 7219.12.00.81, 7219.31.00.10, 7219.90.00.10, 7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25, 7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80, 7220.11.00.00, 7220.20.10.10, 7220.20.10.15, 7220.20.10.60, 7220.20.10.80, 7220.20.60.05, 7220.20.60.10, 7220.20.60.15, 7220.20.60.60, 7220.20.60.80, 7220.90.00.10, 7220.90.00.15, 7220.90.00.60, and 7220.90.00.80. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the Order is dispositive.6 Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization in the event of revocation of the Order and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked, is provided in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), which is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following net countervailable subsidy rates: 6 For a complete discussion of the scope, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Fourth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South Africa,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM 23MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16455-16457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-831]


Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Final Results 
and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 26th Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2019-2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 
from the People's Republic of China (China) for the period of review 
(POR) November 1, 2019, through October 31, 2020. We determine that 
mandatory respondent, Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd. 
(Shunchang) failed to establish its eligibility for a separate rate 
and, therefore, is part of the China-wide entity. We are rescinding the 
review with respect to Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. (Harmoni).

DATES: Applicable March 23, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacob Saude, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0981.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 30, 2021, Commerce published the preliminary results of 
the twenty-sixth administrative review of fresh garlic from China.\1\ 
No interested party submitted comments concerning the Preliminary 
Results or requested that a hearing be held. Commerce conducted this 
administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (the Act).

[[Page 16456]]

The current deadline for the final results is March 30, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, 
In Part, of the 26th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-
2020, 86 FR 67911 (November 30, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products subject to the order are all grades of garlic, whole 
or separated into constituent cloves, whether or not peeled, fresh, 
chilled, frozen, provisionally preserved, or packed in water or other 
neutral substance, but not prepared or preserved by the addition of 
other ingredients or heat processing. The differences between grades 
are based on color, size, sheathing, and level of decay. The scope of 
the order does not include the following: (a) Garlic that has been 
mechanically harvested and that is primarily, but not exclusively, 
destined for non-fresh use; or (b) garlic that has been specially 
prepared and cultivated prior to planting and then harvested and 
otherwise prepared for use as seed. The subject merchandise is used 
principally as a food product and for seasoning. The subject garlic is 
currently classifiable under subheadings: 0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0005, 
0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0015, 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 
0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, 
and 2005.99.9700, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS).
    Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive. In order to be excluded from the order, garlic entered 
under the HTSUS subheadings listed above that is: (1) Mechanically 
harvested and primarily, but not exclusively, destined for nonfresh 
use; or (2) specially prepared and cultivated prior to planting and 
then harvested and otherwise prepared for use as seed must be 
accompanied by declarations to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
to that effect.

Final Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

    In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that the review 
request from Roots Farm for Harmoni was invalid ab initio, and it 
preliminarily rescinded the administrative review with respect to 
Harmoni. Because Commerce did not receive any comments on its 
preliminary finding, Commerce continues to find that the review request 
from Roots Farm was invalid ab initio, and Commerce is rescinding this 
review with respect to Harmoni.

China-Wide Entity

    Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide 
entity applies to this administrative review.\2\ Under this policy, the 
China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically 
requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because 
no party requested a review of the China-wide entity in this review, 
and Commerce did not self-initiate a review, the entity is not under 
review and the entity's rate (i.e., $4.71/kg) is not subject to change. 
Aside from the companies for which the review has been or is being 
rescinded, Commerce considers all other companies for which a review 
was requested, and which did not preliminarily qualify for a separate 
rate, to be part of the China-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Administrative Review

    Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping 
margin exists for the administrative review covering the period 
November 1, 2019, through October 31, 2020:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                                                                margin
                          Exporter                             (dollars
                                                                  per
                                                               kilogram)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
China-Wide Entity \3\.......................................        4.71
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The companies that are part of the China-wide entity in this 
review are Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd. and Jining 
Shunchang Food Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the 
final results of this review. Commerce intends to direct CBP to assess 
rates based on the per-unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on each entry 
of the subject merchandise during the POR. Commerce also intends to 
issue assessment instructions no earlier than 35 days after the 
publication date of the final results of this review in the Federal 
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to 
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request 
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the 
subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice in the 
Federal Register, as provided by sections 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) For 
the companies identified in the chart above, the cash deposit rate will 
be the China-wide rate; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed 
Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed above that have received a 
separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit 
rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the 
most recent period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the China-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. 
dollars per kilogram; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to Chinese exporter that supplied that 
non-Chinese exporter. These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notifications Regarding Administrative Protection Order

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO 
materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance 
with sections

[[Page 16457]]

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: March 14, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-06076 Filed 3-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.